5. What is Emerging Europe?
•
Nine countries - stretching from Slovenia to Romania,
from Poland to Croatia
•
All EU regulated, part of the EU’s Single Market
•
110 million consumers
•
A combined GDP of over £ 1 trillion
•
Potential to double exports by 2020
•
Lower risk profile than other distant emerging markets
•
Easy and low cost access – just 2-3 hours from the UK
•
Proven market for UK businesses
5
6. Sustainable Medium-term Growth...
...on a par with other emerging economies
Average Annual GDP Growth Forecast (%)
2010-20
2030-40
CEE Average
4.7
4.2
3.8
Dev. World
1.8
1.8
1.9
Asia
5.8
5.1
4.7
Latin America
6
2020-30
4.9
4.5
4.1
Source: HSBC The World in 2050
9. New Build –7 countries, over £66 bn
• Poland: 2 x new 3GW (each) power plants in 2024 &
2030 (£1 bn AUKV)
• Bulgaria: New Westinghouse AP1000 reactor at
Kozloduy NPP – early 2020s (£800m)
• Czech Republic: New reactor at Temelin NPP in
2024 (£500m)
• Romania: 2 x CANDU 6 reactors at Cernavodă in
2022 (£400m)
9
9
10. Life Extension in 4 countries, over £2.1 bn
• Bulgaria: 20 year life extension, 2 VVER units, from 2014, £40m AUKV
• Romania: Replacing fuel channels in CANDU reactors, Cernavoda,£120m
AUKV from 2018
• Slovenia: Life extension of Westinghouse PWR operating life in Krško,
£15m AUKV
10
10
11. Decommissioning & Waste Management
£3.5 bn across 5 markets
•Bulgaria: On-going decommissioning (4 units) and waste programme with
UK firm (Nuvia Ltd) co-managing, £40m AUKV
•Romania: New waste repository project, starting 2015, £40m AUKV
•Slovakia: Ongoing tendering for decommissioning 2 units, £100m AUKV
11
11
12. UK Nuclear supply chain….
It’s not just about world-class Civil Engineering....
12
15. Czech Republic: Bretislav Nitka
• New Build (£17 bn AUKV)
• 2 companies (Westinghouse AP1000 and Rosatom VVER)
under evaluation
• The winner should be announced in Q1 2015
15
16. Romania: Daniella Lulache
• Building of 2 CANDU 6 reactors at Cernavoda
• Legal and consulting services - construction of 3 rd & 4th
reactors, Cernavoda
• LIL waste repository
16
17. Poland: Marzena Piszczek
• 2 x new 3 GW nuclear power plants in 2024 and 2030 (cca.
£12 bln total cost)
• Owner’s Engineer tender (3 UK companies involved) – winner
to be announced in Q1 2014
• Integrated Reactor tender to be issued in Q4 2014
17
18. Slovakia: Peter Liska
• New NPP - Jaslovské Bohunice
• Decommissioning the two units of V1 - Jaslovské Bohunice
NPP
• V1’s two reactors to be decommissioned in 2025
18
19. Bulgaria: Sashka Evtimova
• 20 year life extension - Kozloduy Unit 5 & 6
• New Build - AP1000 reactor at Kozloduy
• Decommissioning - VVER reactors at Kozloduy site
19
20. Hungary: Csilla Toth
• 2 new VVER nuclear power plants (Paks NNP)
• Ongoing project for 20 year life extension of 4 existing
blocks (VVER-440)
• Final disposal facility for low- and intermediate-level wastes
20
21. Slovenia: Ales Bursic
• Considering building 2nd nuclear reactor at Krško (~1.2 GW)
• Extension of operating life of Krško
• Decommissioning & Waste Management opportunities
.
21
22. Croatia: Zeljko Tomsic
• Hrvatska Elektroprivreda - co-owner of 696 MWe NPP Krško
in Slovenia
• Croatia has not yet reached the decision on the construction
of NNB
• Preliminary activities – not carried out yet
22
29. 1.1 Business Overview
A large clean energy corporation
Established in September 1994, originally named China Guangdong Nuclear
Power Holding Corporation and in April 2013 renamed China General Nuclear
Power Corporation
CGN is currently the world’s largest developer and constructor of NPPs:
CGN is operating 56% of China’s nuclear operating capacity totaling
8.33GW
CGN is building 16 reactors, totaling 18.8GW and a share of 55% of
China’s Nuclear Program
CGN’s renewable power capacity to date:
Wind: 4.7GW
Hydro: 4.0GW
Solar: 600MW
30. 1.2 History
GNPS
Construction with loans, repayment by
electricity sales, operation through joint venture
LNPS Phase II, Hongyanhe NPP Phase I, Ningde NPP Phase I,
Yangjiang NPP, Fangchenggang NPP Phase I, CPR1000
Taishan NPP Phase I (with EPR)
Fangchenggang NPP Phase II
Developing renewable energies
First large
commercial nuclear
power station in
mainland China
Initial period
1979-1994
Development period
1995-2004
LNPS Phase I
Self-reliant development
Realizing “self-reliance”
capabilities
Fast growing period
2005-2011
Post-Fukushima
period
2012 —
Developing proprietary G3
technology — HL1000-1
31. 1.3 Organization
CGN has 34 main subsidiaries and affiliates
China General Nuclear Power
Group
China General Nuclear Power
Corporation
Nuclear Power
Nuclear
Fuel
Non-nuclear
Clean Energy
Financial
&Comprehensive
Services
2 business
units
5 branch
companies
7 business
dept.
10 functional
dept.
Guangdong Nuclear Power Investment Co., Ltd.
Guangdong Nuclear Power Joint Venture Co., Ltd.
Ling’ao Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
Lingdong Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
Yangjiang Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
Liaoning Hongyanhe Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
Fujian Ningde Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
Taishan Nuclear Power Joint Venture Co., Ltd.
Guangxi Fangchenggang Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
Xianning Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
Lufeng Nuclear Power Co., Ltd
Hubei Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
Anhui Wuhu Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
Lingwan Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
Shaoguan Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
Xishui Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
China General Nuclear Power Operations Co., Ltd.
Daya Bay Nuclear Power Operations and Management
Co., Ltd.
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd.
China Nuclear Power Design Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen)
China Nuclear Power Technology Research Institute Co.,
Ltd.
China Techenergy Co., Ltd.
Suzhou Nuclear Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.
Guangdong Daya Bay Nuclear Environmental Protection
Co., Ltd.
CGN Nuclear Fuel Co., Ltd.
CGN Energy Service Co., Ltd.
Meiya Power Co., Ltd.
CGN Solar Energy Development Co., Ltd.
CGN Wind Energy Limited
CGN Energy Development Co., Ltd.
CGN (Beijing) Application Technology Co.,
Ltd.
Guangdong Daya Bay Nuclear Power Service
(Group) Co., Ltd.
CGN Industrial Investment Fund Management
Co., Ltd.
CGN Finance Co., Ltd.
32. 1.4 Strategies
Strategic position
Corporate mission
World’s leading clean
energy supplier and
service provider
Develop clean energy
to benefit the society
A
B
CGN
Corporate vision
world’s first-class
clean energy group
C
D
Next development
Better performance in nuclear power
industry
More efforts in renewable energies
Domestic development + overseas
expansion
Self-reliant growth + cooperation
By 2020, CGN’s total installed capacity will be over 90GW, with annual on-grid
electricity up to 420 billion kWh.
33. 1.5 Nuclear Power Plants Details
NPP
Reactor Type
Units
Capacity
Total Capacity (MWe)
(MWe)
LNPS Phase I
M310
2 x 990
LNPS Phase II
CPR1000
Hongyanhe NPP Phase I
CPR1000/CPR1000+
1 x 1119
CPR1000/CPR1000+
1 x 1089
CPR1000/CPR1000+
3 x 1119
Ningde NPP Phase I
CPR1000/CPR1000+
3 x 1089
Yangjiang NPP
CPR1000/CPR1000+
Taishan NPP Phase I
EPR
2 x 1750
Fangchenggang NPP Phase I
Under Construction
2 x 984
Hongyanhe NPP Phase I
Development
M310
Ningde NPP Phase I
In service
GNPS
CPR1000/CPR1000+
2 x 1080
Lufeng NPP Phase I
AP1000
2 x 1250
Fangchenggang NPP Phase II
ACC1000
ACPR1000
8
16
4
2 x 1087
4 x 1086
2 x 1086
2 x 1150
8330
18800
4800
By 2015, CGN will have 22 operating nuclear reactors with installed capacity of 25 GW
35. 2.1 NPP Construction Capabilities
More than 5,000 experienced engineers, with activities covering siting,
feasibility studies, consultation, design, engineering, procurement, construction,
startup & commissioning and etc.
Project management
Engineering
Customized services
as a project general
contractor
Equipment
procurement
staff in each field
Construction
management
Note : E (engineering)
P (equipment procurement)
C (construction)
S (startup & commissioning)
Startup
37. 2.1 NPP Construction Capabilities
Business Distribution in the World
With representative offices set up in a number of countries, a preliminary internal organization and operation
mode for international projects have come into being; with assessment made on target market, regional
organizations for market exploration have taken shape.
With the French subsidiary company as a platform, CGN is building a large platform to expand its business in
Europe in the fields of nuclear power, wind power and solar energy etc.
With WECAN as a media, a preliminary platform has been formed for cooperation with overseas peers in
international businesses.
38. 2.1 NPP Construction Capabilities
Engineering & Design
Has formed a complete and effective nuclear power design and research
system;
The ability for self-design and in-service modification of CPR1000 unit;
Independently developed generation III technology ACPR1000;
Working on ACPR1000+ and ACC1000 technology.
39. 2.1 NPP Construction Capabilities
Equipment Procurement & Supply
Capable of procurement for several
domestic and foreign NPP at the same
time;
Has formed an appropriate supply
system;
A team of professionals experienced in
engineering practice;
An equipment supervision organization
system has taken shape;
40. 2.1 NPP Construction Capabilities
Construction Management
strong ability in construction organization and resources control
A standardized project implementation system and a resources guarantee
system;
Mastered key NPP construction technologies for EM2 installation, automatic
welding of main pipelines, DCS installation, half-speed turbine generator
installation, self-compacting concrete, etc.
41. 2.1 NPP Construction Capabilities
Startup & Commissioning
A professional team suitable for
“multi-project and multitechnology” commissioning
activities;
Capability for independently
contracting commissioning;
A sound management system
and technical system;
42. 2.1 NPP Construction Capabilities
Project Management
Established a complete and internationally-consistent project management
system;
A specialized team with rich experiences in engineering management;
Formed mature “Matrix-style & Project-style” management & operation
system.
43. 2.2 NPP Construction Achievements
Units in operation
GNPS
LNPS Phase I
LNPS Phase II
2 Units(M310)
2 Units(M310)
2 Units(CPR1000)
Hongyanhe
NPP Phase I
Unit 1
(CPR1000+)
Ningde NPP
Phase I Unit 1
(CPR1000+)
44. 2.2 NPP Construction Achievements
Units under construction
Hongyanhe 3 Units
(CPR1000/CPR1000+)
Fangchenggang
2 Units
(CPR1000/CPR
1000+)
Ningde 3 Units
(CPR1000/CPR1000+)
Taishan NPP
2 units (EPR)
Yangjiang 6 units
(CPR1000/CPR1000+/
ACPR1000)
45. .
2.2 NPP Construction Achievements
Achievement of Ling’Ao Phase II
Unit 1 and Unit 2 were put into commercial
operation in September 2010 and August 2011
respectively.
As China’s supporting project for self-reliance,
LNPS II applies CPR1000 technology with
independent brand, whose site selection, design,
procurement, construction, equipment installation,
commissioning and as-built handover were all
undertaken by CNPEC.
Several major technical improvements were
adopted, such as digital I&C technology, advanced
core fuel management, half-speed turbine
generator, passive hydrogen recombiner, etc.
Its comprehensive technical, safety and economic
indicator have reached advanced level among the
same type of NPPs internationally.
46. 2.2 NPP Construction Achievements
Achievement of Hongyanhe NPP Phase I unit 1
Unit 1 was put into commercial operation on June 6,2013, adopting CPR1000
technology;
CGN contracted the whole project and took charge of the project’s
construction, design, equipment procurement etc.
96 improved technologies were applied, including 18-month refueling interval.
47. 2.2 NPP Construction Achievements
Achievement of Ningde NPP Phase I unit 1
Unit 1 was put into commercial operation on April 15, 2013, as the first
unit of CGN to come into operation outside Guangdong province.
Created many firsts in China, such as first 18-month refueling, first
localized full-scope simulator and first automatic welding of main pipe,
etc;
Providing precious experiences for the subsequent unit construction.
48. 2.3 Taishan NPP (based on EPR technology)
Taishan Nuclear Power Joint Venture, which is jointly owned by CGNPC, YUDEAN
and EDF, is mainly in charge of the financing, construction, operation and
management of Taishan Nuclear Power Plant Phase I and is liable for the final
nuclear safety of the project.
YUDEAN
CGNPC
TNPJVC
EDF
49. 2.3 Taishan NPP (overall progress)
Engineering and Procurement
The overall and the primary design are finished. The detailed design and
commissioning documentation are underway
Main equipment manufacturing is to be finished
Auxiliary equipment and bulk material supply are at their peak
Construction and installation
Most of Unit 1 Civil Work is finished
Main equipment installation finished
Unit 2 Civil Work is at its peak with part of installation started
Commissioning and Hand-over
Nuclear circuit clearing under way for unit 1
Target: Initial fuel loading: End of 2014
50. 2.4 Operation Capabilities
Experience
sharing among
international
peers
Safe reactor
technology
Effective
emergency
response
Reliable
equipments
CGN
staff
Nuclear
safety
culture
Safety
supervision
Highly-qualified
staffs
Safety
management
Nuclear safety is of prime importance to CGN
51. 2.4 Operation Capabilities
Unified management principles, standards, requirements and methods
An integrated operation platform for regional operation, outage contracting,
spare parts supply, technical support etc.
Shortest outage duration: 18.38 days for yearly refueling outage, and 56 days
for 10 yearly outage
Capacity factor: average capacity factor of the six units at GNPS, LNPS
Phase I and Phase II was 89.64% in 2012
Unit 1 of GNPS continues safe operation days (without reactor scram)
exceeded 4040 days
53. 2.4 Operation Capabilities
Operational Performance-Rad-waste Control
Since its operations, the gaseous and liquid rad-waste of GNPS and LNPS Phase I has
been far below national limits and the generation of solid rad-waste below design criteria.
In 2012, the average unit gaseous and liquid rad-wastes of GNPS and LNPS Phase I,II
took up only 0.074% and 0.023% of the annual national limits respectively, and the solid
rad-wastes took up 9.85% of the design value.
G
aseous
Sol i d
Li qui d
500.00
750.00
600.00
300.00
450.00
200.00
300.00
100.00
150.00
0.00
year
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
0.00
Sol i d(m )
³
400.00
1994
G
aseous(TBq)、Li qui d(G
Bq)
900.00
55. 3.1 Overview
Starting from full dependence on technology introduction, to self-reliance on
technology and manufacturing, China nuclear power equipment manufacturing
went through a hard but effective innovative path.
Daya Bay NPP:
Equipment localization
rate was only 1%
Initial stage( 1980s)
•Joint R&D;
•Cultivating
capabilities;
•Preliminarily capable
for manufacturing a full
set of NI main
equipment.
Development Stage
•Promote selfreliance of nuclear
power equipment;
•Close cooperation
among government,
users,
manufacturers, and
research institutions
Post-Fukushima stage
56. 3.1 Overview
Three Manufacturing
Bases
• Dongfang Electric
Corporation Limited;
• Shanghai Electric Group
Co.,Ltd.
• Harbin Power Plant
Equipment Corporation
Large Forged Pieces and
RPV Manufacturing
Groups
• China First Heavy Industries;
• China National Erzhong
Group;
• Shanghai Heavy Machinery
Co.,Ltd
Auxiliary Equipment
Manufacturing
Factories
• Nuclear level
pumps/valves/cable;
• Reactor Internals;
• Control rod driving
mechanism;
• Main pipelines,
• Polar crane.
China Nuclear Power Equipment Industry
57. 3.2 NI/CI Equipment Technology & Supply
Dongfang Electric Corporation Limited
Keeping a leading position in
nuclear power equipment
manufacturing field;
The only manufacturer for both
NI main equipment and CI
turbine generators covering
AP1000, EPR and advanced
generation II technology.
58. 3.2 NI/CI Equipment Technology & Supply
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.
Has the strongest domestic nuclear power equipment manufacturing and
supply capability;
Supplying NI main equipment for all China nuclear power projects under
construction;
Production capacity: 4-6 ones (sets) per year for NI main equipment ; and
8-10 ones (sets) per for reactor internals and CRDM.
Owning the largest and the most complete NI main equipment
manufacturing base with the most concentrated business.
59. 3.2 NI/CI Equipment Technology&Supply
Harbin Power Plant Equipment Corporation.
The only domestic manufacturer supplying 4 CI
and main pump motors for AP1000 projects,
Zhejiang Sanmen and Shangdong Haiyang
NPP;
Starts early in generation III technology with an
obvious advantage;
Production capacity: 2 sets NI main equipment
and 4 CI equipment per year;
60. 3.3 R&D and Manufacturing of Large Forged Pieces
China First Heavy Industries
The first enterprise to develop and produce nuclear power equipment in
China.
Item
RPV forged piece (full set)
Applied NPP
Hongyanhe NPP unit 1
SG Tubesheet and forged piece
(full set)
Hongyan NPP unit 2
Yangjiang NPP unit 2
Pressurizer
---
Main pipelines
--
Production Capability
Be capable of supplying
equipment for System80+, PWR,
high temperature gas cooled
reactor, generation IV fast reactor,
etc.
61. 3.3 R&D and Manufacturing of Large Forged Pieces
China National Erzhong Group
The first enterprise to research and develop AP1000 main pipelines forged
pieces successfully in the world
Item
SG tubesheet
SG forged piece ( full
set medium
High and )
voltage cylinder forged
piece
Turbine Rotator Forged
piece
RPV forged piece
Main pump casing
Main pipelines forged
piece
Pressurizer forged
piece
Applied NPP
Hongyanhe NPP unit 2
Yangjiang NPP unit 2
Ling’Ao Phase II unit 1
Ningde NPP unit 3
-----
64. CNNC: The Main Force of Nuclear Power
Development in China
Jan. 27th , 2014
Civil Nuclear Power Showcase, London
China National Nuclear Corporation
66. CNNC Profile
A State-owned Large Entity for Nuclear Industry
Founded in 1955
100,000 employees
110 subsidiaries
(R &D institutes,
plants…)
Headquarters office building
68. CNNC Profile
A Complete Nuclear Power
Industrial Chain
Site Selection
and Evaluation
Decommissioning
Engineering
and Design
Operation and
Maintenance
Nuclear Fuel
Supply
Equipment
Manufacture
Construct
ion
Start-up and
Commissioning
70. CNNC Profile
CNNC 30 years experience in nuclear power
1980s
1990s
Self-reliance design of
the first NPP(300MWe)
Self-reliance design
of CP600(650MWe)
Introduction NPP from
France (900MWe)
Construction of NPP
(1000MWe)
2000s
Self-reliance design
of
CP1000(1200MWe)
ACP1000 Self-reliance
Program Supporting Project
71. CNNC Profile
In Operation: 9 units, 6496MWe
Qinshan Phase I
Qinshan Phase II
1x320 MWe PWR
4x650 MWe PWR
73. Nuclear Power
Under Construction: 5 projects with 12units
Fuqing 4x1080MWe PWR
Sanmen 2x1250MWe PWR
Fangjiashan 2x1080MWe PWR
Changjiang 2x650MWe PWR
Tianwan 2x1126MWe PWR
74. Nuclear Power
R&D, Engineering Design, Construction, Operation and
Management of Nuclear Power Plants of 100MWe,
300MWe, 600MWe and 1000MWe.
CP300
CP600
CP1000
ACP100
ACP600
Indigenous PWR NPP Series
ACP1000
75. Nuclear Power
Main Index
No.
Item
Unit
CP300
CP600
CP1000
1
Nominal Electric Power
MWe
325
650
1100
2
Design Life
Year
40
40
60
3
Refueling Cycle
Month
12
12
18
4
Plant Availability
%
≥ 82
≥ 82
≥90
5
Core Damage
Frequency
1/reactor·year
≤10-5
≤10-5
≤10-5
6
Large Release
Frequency
1/reactor·year
≤10-6
≤10-6
≤10-6
76. Nuclear Power
No.
Item
Unit
1
Nominal Electric
Power
2
Main Index
ACP100
ACP600
ACP1000
MWe
120
650
1200
Design Life
Year
60
60
60
3
Refueling Cycle
Month
18
18
18
4
Plant Availability
%
≥95
≥ 90
≥ 90
5
Core Damage
Frequency
1/reactor·year
≤10-6
≤10-6
≤10-6
6
Large Release
Frequency
1/reactor·year
≤10-7
≤10-7
≤10-7
77. Nuclear Power
CP300: Qinshan-I ; Chashma Units1,2Pakistan
CP600: Qinshan-II Units1,2,3,4; Changjiang Units1,2
ACP1000: Fuqing Units 5,6, to be constructed at the end of 2014
(Most likely ACC1000, a further development of ACP1000)
CP300
CP600
ACP1000
78. ACP1000
Single-unit Layout of ACP1000
Meet the requirements of Generation-III Nuclear
Power Plant Design
Adopt Active & Passive Design
Feedback of Fukushima Nuclear AccidentEnhancement in Design of ACP1000
79. ACP1000
ACP1000 Advantages
SAFETY:
Active & Passive Safety Designs
Integrated Severe Accident Prevention & Mitigation Measures
Enhanced Protection against External Hazards
Improved Emergency Response Measures
Proven Design and Equipment Technology
RELIABILITY
:
Based on Mature Technology and 30 years of
Engineering Experience
NSSS Proved by Long-term Operation
Proven Manufacture and Construction Technology
81. Nuclear Power Supply Chain
Manufacture of Nuclear Power Equipment
Reactor Press.
Turbine
Vessel(RPV)
Capability of supplying of full scope of nuclear power equipment
88. R&D Facilities
Strong R&D Capabilities
25 Research Institutes:
China Institute of Atomic Energy
(CIAE)
Nuclear Power Institute of China
(NPIC)
China Institute for Radiation Protection
(CIRP)
Research Institute of Nuclear Power Operation
(RINPO)
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co.
(CNPE)
Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology
(BRIUG)
……
89. R&D Facilities
Leading of technology:
18 Academicians
29 senior advisors for central
government
110 Ph. D supervisors
33,000 scientific & technical
professionals
Academicians from CNNC
90. R&D Facilities
A Platform with Advanced Scientific Research Capabilities
Miniature Neutron Source Reactor
(27~30KW, 1x1012 n/cm2·sec)
High Flux Engineering Test Reactor
(125MW, 6.2×1014n/cm2·sec )
97. Suggested Cooperation Area
Nuclear Power
Investment
R&D, Engineering Design
GDA, SLC process
Supply chain, Construction, Commissioning, Operating support
Life extension, Decommissioning
Rad-waste Treatment
HLW disposal
Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Conversion, Enrichment
Fuel fabrication and supply
Reprocessing technology and practice.
Local Community Development
103. POWER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
109
National Power Development Plan for the period 2011 – 2020, with vision to
2030 (PDP7)
Growth of power demand: 12 ÷ 15%/
year
UNCLASSIFIED
104. TENTATIVE PLANNING SITES FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF NPPS
110
The tentative planning sites for construction
of nuclear power plants was approved by
the Prime Minister, including 07 candidate
sites, each site is potential
to construct
from 4-6 units.
The tentative capacity for each plant:
Plant
Capacity (MW)
Ninh Thuan 1 phase 1, unit 1+2
1000 × 2
Ninh Thuan 2 phase 1, unit 1+2
1000 × 2
Ninh Thuan 1 phase 2, unit 3+4
1000 × 2
Ninh Thuan 2 phase 2, unit 3+4
1000 × 2
5 tentative sites (4 ÷ 6 units for
each)
1000 or 1300 ÷
1500 (after 2025)
UNCLASSIFIED
105. DEVELOPMENT POLICY
Investment policy
•
•
First four units of Ninh Thuan are assigned to Electricity of Vietnam as Project Owner.
The next units will be considered to assign to other State Owned Corporations or Joint Ventures.
Technology policy
•
Selection of modern, safety and proven technology as well as possibility of technology transfer
Localization policy
Fuel policy: up to 2030, the fuel is imported
Radioactive waste management:
•
Low radioactive waste and spent fuel are storage at NPP, Conducting sitting for long-term low and
medium radioactive waste disposal.
Intensive international cooperation in investment and technology transfer.
UNCLASSIFIED
109. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY
FRAMEWORK (1)
115
Atomic Energy
Atomic Energy
Regulation & Guidance on implementing some Articles of
Regulation & Guidance on implementing some Articles of
the Law;
the Law;
Detailed Regulation & Guidance on Implementing Some
Detailed Regulation & Guidance on Implementing Some
Articles of the Law relating to NPP
Articles of the Law relating to NPP
Developing Orientation; Regulation on nuclear control; Training &
Developing Orientation; Regulation on nuclear control; Training &
Development of HR; Environmental Monitoring & Radioactive
Development of HR; Environmental Monitoring & Radioactive
Warning; Storage, Disposal Sites of Radioactive Waste;
Warning; Storage, Disposal Sites of Radioactive Waste;
Measures to Guaranty Safety & Security; Capability Building for
Measures to Guaranty Safety & Security; Capability Building for
R&D & Technical support; etc.
R&D & Technical support; etc.
Radiation activities, Regulation on Radiation safety, Inspection,
Radiation activities, Regulation on Radiation safety, Inspection,
Control of Nuclear Materials, Nuclear safety for Sites of NPP,
Control of Nuclear Materials, Nuclear safety for Sites of NPP,
Forms of Investment monitoring & Evaluation Reports, etc.
Forms of Investment monitoring & Evaluation Reports, etc.
Thousands of codes & standards equivalent to IEC, ISO,
Thousands of codes & standards equivalent to IEC, ISO,
CODEX, etc.
CODEX, etc.
UNCLASSIFIED
110. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY
FRAMEWORK (2)
International legal instruments governing nuclear activities in
force.
Need to enact a comprehensive nuclear law.
Need to develop and promulgate other legislation affected by
nuclear power programme
Adaptation of the vendors’ regulatory system is required great
time and effort
UNCLASSIFIED
111. HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
Personnel for R&D, safety and security in atomic energy field.
Personnel working in regulatory bodies to implement regulations,
codes and standards for plant licensing, site approval, operator
licensing, radiation protection, safeguards, waste management,
decommissioning, etc.
Expertise working in educational institutions.
Personnel for nuclear power plant management of construction
phase and operation phase.
Business and technical expertise for procurement and management
Expertise to conduct training programs for O&M
UNCLASSIFIED
112. STAFFING SCHEDULE FOR NPP PROJECT
118
NPB
Pre-Operation under NPB
Operator Organization under EVN
1200
1000
Milestone 3
Milestone 2
Milestone 1
800
<---Phase 1-->
600
<------------- Phase 2------------>
Bid Preparations
400
n
s
p
f
o
r
e
b
m
u
N
200
<------------- Phase 3 ------------>
Design, Construct, Comm'n
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Year
UNCLASSIFIED
11
12
13
14
15
16
113. STAFFING SCHEDULE FOR NPP PROJECT
119
COD
-5
COD
-3
(EPC)
COD
-2
Participate in the installation
and commissioning activities
COD
Establishment of the
operational takeover
procedure
OJT
Establishment of
training center
Operator training
O&M staff training
Radiation staff training
Others
UNCLASSIFIED
COD + 2
Takeover of the
operation
114. HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT POLICY
120
Long-term education and training:
• Local education & training (assigned universities & training centers, training programs of
MoET and MoIT );
• Dispatching personnel abroad for Ph.D, Master/Engineer (Russia, Japan, Sweden, Czech
Republic, France, Korea, etc.)
Short-term training:
• Dispatching personnel abroad for short training courses.
• Workshops, conferences and training courses with the assistance of IAEA
Vietnam needs a strong support from nuclear developed countries in developing
human resources related to project management, nuclear safety and security,
waste management, fuel management, etc. via workshops, conferences and
long-term training programs to meet the human resource demand timely.
UNCLASSIFIED
118. STATE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (1)
124
National Appraisal Committee:
Verify of FS and report the verification result to the P.M
The Committee could employ local or foreign consultants to assist the Committee in verifying or reviewing the FS report.
UNCLASSIFIED
119. STATE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (1)
125
National Atomic Energy Council :
To be an adviser to the Prime Minister on orientation, strategy and application of atomic energy
development.
Co-ordinate the operation of Ministries, ministerial organizations, etc.
Cooperation with international organizations, experienced countries in nuclear field
National Nuclear Safety Council:
To be an adviser to the Prime Minister on the policy and nuclear safety measures in using
atomic energy, in the operation of NPP and emergency response.
Review the reports on the verification results of trial operation and SAR of NPP, etc.
Taking investigation, discussion and holding the consultation with Vietnamese and foreign
experts and specialists in issues related to nuclear field.
UNCLASSIFIED
120. STATE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (2)
126
Verify
SAR
Verify
EIA
report
Authorities in charge of verifying SAR (Vietnam Agency for Radiation and Nuclear Safety VARANS) and EIA (Agency for Environmental Impact Assessment and Appraisal – EIA) could
employ or invite Vietnamese or foreign organizations which have the capability for verifying the
reports partly or wholly.
UNCLASSIFIED
121. TWO FIRST NPP PLANT PROJECTS (1)
EVN is assigned to be the owner of the six component projects under
the Ninh Thuan nuclear power project:
1. Ninh Thuan 11 nuclear power plant project (2000MW)
1. Ninh Thuan nuclear power plant project (2000MW)
2. Ninh Thuan 22 nuclear power plant project (2000MW)
2. Ninh Thuan nuclear power plant project (2000MW)
3. Project on infrastructure for construction of nuclear power plants in Ninh
3. Project on infrastructure for construction of nuclear power plants in Ninh
Thuan province (infrastructure project)
Thuan province (infrastructure project)
4. Project on operation management zone, expert zone, headquarters of Ninh
4. Project on operation management zone, expert zone, headquarters of Ninh
Thuan nuclear power project management board (EVNNPB)
Thuan nuclear power project management board (EVNNPB)
5. Project on Public Relation Center for nuclear power
5. Project on Public Relation Center for nuclear power
6. Project on human resource training for nuclear power plants in Ninh Thuan
6. Project on human resource training for nuclear power plants in Ninh Thuan
province
province
UNCLASSIFIED
122. TWO FIRST NPP PLANT PROJECTS (2)
128
Ninh Thuan 1:
- FS & SAD development consultant: consortium E4 Group, JSC KIEP and LLC EPT, Russia.
- Owner’s Consultant: being selected.
- The consultant on developing technical design: Russian Consultants.
The final report of FS and SAD have been submitted.
Ninh Thuan 2:
- FS & SAD development consultant: JAPC, Japan.
- Owner’s Consultant: has been selected.
-The consultant on developing technical design: not yet selected.
The final report of FS and SAD have been submitted.
Other component projects : local consultants
UNCLASSIFIED
124. SUMMARY
130
As a new emerging country in nuclear field, Vietnam has faced many difficulties and challenges
with regard to the nuclear infrastructure
For the up-coming steps of the construction of the two first NPPs, Vietnam calls upon the support
from rich experienced countries and organizations in nuclear field to:
Develop regulatory and legislative documents.
Verify the reports on Safety Assessment and Environmental Impact Assessment.
Develop Human resources
UNCLASSIFIED
128. GE Hitachi and
Advanced Nuclear
Reactor Design
David Powell
Vice President Europe region
Nuclear Power Plant Sales
UKTI Conference
London
27-29th January 2014
Copyright 2010 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy - All rights reserved
134
130. The GE Hitachi Nuclear Alliance has been
bringing innovation to the market for 50 years
Wilmington, NC
USA
Tokyo, Japan
• Nuclear Power Plants,
ABWR, ESBWR, and PRISM
• Nuclear Services
• Advanced Programs …
Recycling, Isotopes
Wilmington, NC
USA
• Uranium
Enrichment
… Third
Generation
Technology
Wilmington, NC
Peterborough, ON
Canada
Yokosuka, Japan
• Nuclear Fuel Fabrication
….BWR and CANDU
• CANDU Services
• Fuel Engineering and
Support Services
Copyright 2010 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International - All rights reserved
131. Two strong global parent companies
GE in Europe
• Operating here for over 100 years
• 90,000+ employees
• Annual revenues of €22.5B in 2011
(~20% of GE’s global revenue)
Gene ral Ele c tric
• Operating in >100 countries
• 125+ year legacy
• >300,000 employees worldwide
• 2011 global revenue €110B
Hitac hi
• 100+ year history
• >360,000 employees worldwide
• 2011 global revenue ~ €94 B
Hitac hi in Europe
• Operating here since 1982
• ~10,000 consolidated employees
• Annual revenues of ~€7.4B (~8% of
Hitachi’s global revenue)
C ombine d
•ove r 225 c ompany ye ars of his tory
•More than 660,000 e mploye e s globally and 100,000 in Europe
•Ove r €200B in re ve nue globally and ~ €30B in Europe
Copyright 2012 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy - All rights reserved
137
132. A 50+ year history of success
Dodewaard - Netherlands
Dresden 1 – USA
KRB - Germany
Santa María de Garoña - Spain
Tsuruga 1 - Japan
Chinshan 1&2- Taiwan
KKM - Switzerland
Vallecitos – USA
Cofrentes - Spain
Garigliano - Italy
Laguna Verde - Mexico
Copyright 2011 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International reserved reserved
Copyright 2011 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy - All rights - All rights
Tarapur 1&2 – India
138
134. GE Hitachi’s new reactor portfolio
ABWR
ESBWR
Operational Gen III
Evolutionary Gen III+
Revolutionary technology
technology
technology
with a rich, 40-year heritage
•Lowest core damage frequency
of any Gen III reactor
•Extensive operational
experience
•Licensed in multiple countries
PRISM
•Lowest core damage frequency
of any Gen III or III+ reactor
•Passive cooling for >7 days
•Passive air-cooling with no operator or
mechanical actions needed
•The answer to the used fuel dilemma can reduce nuclear waste to ~300-year
without AC power or operator
radiotoxicity while providing new
action
electricity generation
Lowest projected operations,
•Copyright 2011 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC
All rights reserved
135. The future of our industry
Safety
Innovation
Predictability
Copyright 2011 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy - All rights reserved
Simplicity
141
136. PRA of Core Damage Frequency
Simplicity leading to Safety
PWR
tion
omplica
C
BWR Simp
lification
U.S. PWRs
2 E-5 (avg.)
U.S. BWRs
8 E-6 (avg.)
Generation
II
APR1400
2 E-6
APWR
1.2 E-6
EPR
2.8 E-7
AP1000
2.4 E-7
ABWR
1.6 E-7
III+
Generation III
ESBWR
1.7 E-8
III+
References: Plant licensing DCDs and publically available information
Note: PRA of CDF is represented in at-power internal events (per
year)
Note: NSSS diagrams are for visualization purposes only
Copyright 2011 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved
137. Predictability
1st Kind-of-a
Generation III plant
built in less than 40
months construction
schedule:
Efficient, repeatable model:
38M
39.5M
43.5M
44.5M
41M
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa 6/7 ABWRs
Copyright 2011 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy - All rights reserved
139. ABWR modularization – proven project execution
Roof Truss Steels
Upper Drywell Module
MSIV/CV
RWCU Reheat Exchanger
Condensate Demineralizer
RCCV Top Slab
Condensate Demin. Piping
RCCV liner
T-G Pedestal Piping Unit
Upper Condenser
Central Mat
Base Mat
HCU Room
RPV Pedestal
Offgas Equipment
Copyright 2012 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy - All rights reserved
Lower Condenser Block
145
140. RCCV Upper Drywell Module (Mar. 2009)
2006/11
Construction
Start
▽
2007/09 2008/02
First
Mat
Concrete Completion
▽
▽
2009/07
RPV
On
▽
Fuel
Loading
▽
△RCCV Upper Drywell Module Installation
Shimane-3
Construction
Heaviest module in Reactor Building
Weight: 610 MT: Size:L 87 ft (26m)X W 77 ft (23m) X H 30 ft (9 m)
Copyright 2011 Hitachi GE Nuclear Energy - All rights reserved
142. Global new build moving forward
Lithuania
Finland
United Sweden
Kingdom
USA
Turkey
Russia
China
Japan
Taiwan
Poland
Mexico
Chile
Argentina
Vietnam
Romania
India
Brazil
South Africa
UAE Banglades
h
Saudi Arabia
Thailand
Malaysia
Substantial global interest in new build
Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, LLC - All Rights Reserved
148
143. Recent experience and project status
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa 6/7
ABWR
In Operation
Under Construction
4 Units
4 Units
Ohma ABWR
Under Construction
COD 1996/1997
Shika-2 ABWR
Shimane-3 ABWR
Japan
COD 2006
Hamaoka-5 ABWR
Kaminoseki-1
Under Construction
Lungmen-1/2 ABWR
COD 2005
Continuously building for
58 years
Under Construction
Pre-op testing
Copyright 2012 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy - All rights reserved
149
144. Lungmen ABWR construction update
Overview
TPC Project Timeline
Total Project progress
Construction by TPC
93.7%
97.2%
Unit 1
Pre-Op Test Program
Complete Safety Tests
Fuel Load Unit 1
Commercial Operation
83%
Jun ‘14
Oct ‘14
Oct ‘15
Unit 2
Fuel Load Unit 2
Commercial Operation
Dec ‘16
Dec ‘17
Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, LLC - All Rights Reserved
150
145. Horizon ABWRs in UK moving forward
Horizon Nuclear Power, Ltd.
100% owned by Hitachi, Ltd. (Nov. 2012)
• New Wylfa site
− Location: Anglesey, Wales
− Adjacent to site w/2 Magnox reactors
− Two to three planned units
• Oldbury site
− Location: South Gloucestershine
− Adjacent to site w/2 Magnox reactors
− Two to three planned units
• Generic Design Assessment process started in April 2013 – moved to Step
2 in January 2014.
• GE Hitachi supporting Hitachi GE’s Front-End Engineering and Design.
• ABWR Justification submitted to DECC.
Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, LLC - All Rights Reserved
151
146. New build in the U.S.
“Betting on just one fuel to power our
energy isn’t smart”
– Nick Akins, President, American Electric Power
“… going all in on gas defies everything we
know and preach about diversification and
prudent risk management.” – Tom Farrell, CEO
Dominion
• New build
− Vogtle & V.C. Summer
− North Anna
− Fermi
• Expansion slowed due to economic
conditions, gas prices
Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, LLC - All Rights Reserved
152
147. North Anna 3 GE Hitachi ESBWR
• Dominion selected ESBWR for North Anna 3
Technology attributes … SBO coping
Design Certification status
Competitive offering
• Project Development Agreement
Site-specific ESBWR design & COLA
licensing support
Cost & schedule control incentives
Financial risk allocation process
Negotiated EPC contract (unsigned)
• Fault-based, joint & several consortium
GEH – consortium leader … NI design &
equipment
Fluor – site leader … TI/BOP design & all
construction
• Leveraging ABWR experience … GEH Lungmen
& HGNE Japan
Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC
All rights reserved
North Anna 3* indicative
timeline
•4/2013 – PDA signed
•12/2013 - Dominion to amend COLA
•12/2015 - COL expected & EPC signed
•2017 – Full Notice to Proceed, subject
to receipt of all necessary regulatory
approvals
•2019 – First concrete
•2024 – COD
* Dominion has not yet committed to building NA3, but
expects to make a decision once the COL is received.
148. Disposition of the UK’s Pu requires
innovation
• UK has 112 tons of plutonium (and growing)
… result of used nuclear fuel reprocessing.
• UK Government prefers to re-use plutonium
and is evaluating options.
• PRISM provides an economic and flexible
solution … meets security, non-proliferation
requirements at a lower cost.
Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, LLC - All Rights Reserved
154
149. PRISM declared “credible re-use
option”
• On 20th January 2014, the Nuclear
Decommissioning Authority announced
that PRISM is a “credible option” for
managing the UK’s plutonium stockpile
following 2 year review process.
• Number of benefits of PRISM noted
including “simplified fuel manufacturing
process and reactor construction, and
the ability to utilise the full inventory of
plutonium which should consequently
reduce the overall costs”.
• Further work to be undertaken on
technical and commercial aspects.
www.gehitachiprism.com
Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, LLC - All Rights Reserved
155
150. Closing the fuel cycle – PRISM
• Sustainable new build requires solving the
used fuel dilemma
− PRISM enables used fuel recycling
• Advanced Recycling combines two facilities in
one integrated solution - PRISM with nuclear
fuel recycling centre.
• Designed to reduce used nuclear fuel to ~300year radiotoxicity1 while generating electricity.
• Lower CDF than any reactor on the market.
• Environmentally responsible
To reach the same
radiotoxicity as natural uranium
1
Advanced Recycling
Center designed to reduce
nuclear waste radiotoxicity from
300,000 years to 300 years1
Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, LLC - All Rights Reserved
151. Opportunities for new build supply
Nuclear
•Reactor
Pressure Vessel
•Reactor
Internals
Mechanical
•Steam Turbine
•Condenser
•Heat
Exchangers
•Pumps
•Valves
Electrical
•Generator
•Transformers
•Switchgear
•Cabinets
Equip.
Modules
•Nuclear
nuclear
& non-
Construction
•Concrete
•Rebar
•Buildings
•Doors &
Windows
•Piping
•Fencing
•Sand & Gravel
Chemical
•Radiactive
Waste
•Nitrogen & CO2
Storage
Misc.
•Fire
Protection
Systems
•HVAC Systems
•Cranes & Hoists
•Elevators
•Inspection Svcs
Everything from pressure
vessels to concrete
Copyright 2011 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, LLC - All rights reserved
152. Conclusions
Copyright 2011 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC
Copyright 2011 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC
All rights reserved
All rights reserved
158
153. Leading nuclear innovation for
60 years and beyond …
Vallecitos - 1957
Dresden-1
BWR/1
Oyster
Creek BWR/2
Humboldt Bay
natural circulation
Cofrentes
BWR/6
KK6/KK7
ABWR
Copyright 2013 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy- all rights reserved
North Anna3 ESBWR
PRISM
159
154. …. And Opportunities World wide
• Three generations of GE Hitachi advanced technology
currently being implemented globally.
• Proven advanced technology based on safety,
simplicity and predictability.
• Opportunities for supply chain partners.
ABWR
ESBWR
PRISM
Copyright 2011 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC
All rights reserved
155. Thank you
Copyright 2011 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC
Copyright 2011 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC
All rights reserved
All rights reserved
161
As I said, EE ahead of UKTI curve.
Traditionally at this point, you would see a country-by-country breakdown. Instead we've selected what we believe to be the highlights, considering both likelihood of project happening and likelihood of uk firms winning contracts. Value vs timetable. Opportunity to discuss in more detail at EE dinner tomorrow night.
Total is full estimated value.
UK accessible value is harder to evaluate but we think:
With new build, question is how sure we are it will happen?
Answers available from panel!
Engineers; planning & design; legal; training; finance; regulatory expertise; environmental audits etc.
Engineers; planning & design; legal; training; finance; regulatory expertise; environmental audits etc.
£17 bn in Opportunities for UK Businesses
New Build: Tender to expand the Temelin Nuclear Power Plant announced by CEZ. 3 bidders submitted bids, currently 2 (Westinghouse and Rosatom) are being evaluated. The winner should be announced in 1st Q 2015. This project represents significant opportunities for the UK companies to be part of the supply chain.
New Build: Romania wants to increase its civil nuclear capacity by building 2 more CANDU 6 reactors (1,400 MW in total). Funding still poses a problem; however the Chinese government has signed an agreement with the Romanian one on providing financing. Tenders for consultancy contracts will be issued soon. Life Extension: Replace fuel channels of the reactor for another 25 years of operation. Various projects: Pre-feasibility study for entire project implementation; Design, technical assistance, project analyses, supervision of works, contractual and financial models; Site organisation, including building materials and related technology upgrade; Setting up the radwaste repository. Decomissioning&Waste Management: The Nuclear Agency and Radioactive Waste (ANDR) is responsible for disposal of radioactive waste (RW) and spent nuclear fuel (SNF). A new repository is to be build for the radwaste generated from LPE of Unit 1 and for other various radwaste.Financial&Legal Services: Legal and consulting services for the construction of the third and fourth reactors at the nuclear power plant in Cernavoda. Training Services: Alfred Demonstrator is an European R&D project under the Sustainable Nuclear Energy Technology Platform (SNETP) part of the HORISON 2020 plan conducted by the European Union, involving about 16 European nuclear laboratories (one of them is the Nuclear Research Institute – NRI from Romania) and design-engineering companies. Project Coordinator is Ansaldo Nucleare.
In January 2009, Poland announced plans of building two 3GW (each) nuclear plants. Nuclear is projected to account for around 17% of Poland’s future energy mix. Both government and opposition support the nuclear programme. This is the first attempt at NBN since an abandoned attempt in the 1980s.
Owner’s Engineer Tender - value c. £250mln
Current players in the mix are:
Belgian Tractebel Engineering (consortium lead) and UK’s URS Corp./URS Polska (formerly known as URS ScottWilson)
UK’s Mott MacDonald (consortium lead)
UK’s AMEC (consortium lead)
US Exelon Corp. (consortium lead)
Integrated Reactor Tender – value c. £7-11bln
Integrated reactor tender to be announced (most probably) in Q4/2014 and scheduled to be awarded by end of 2016, consist of:
Technology provider & (partner for co-financing the project)
Engineering, Procurement and Construction services
Owner & Manager support services
Delivery of fuel supply (Polish minerals company KGHM is involved)
Local energy experts assume that Areva/EdF and GE Hitachi have the strongest position. Why, because, we do not expect Poland to repeat the ‘British’, ‘Czech’ or ‘Hungarian’ scenarios where Russian Rosatom supports the countries’ nuclear projects. The US Westinghouse Nuclear and Korean Kepco are also known to be potential players. In conversation, Vice President PISZCZEK confirmed that Kepco’s governmental financing for the project made them a highly attractive partner.
Opportunities for UK businesses - Medium Term: 18 months - 5 years
Supply Chain
Tier 2 & 3 Supply chain: opportunities resulting from award of integrated tender in 2016.
Long Term: 5 years +
Second Plant
Beginning of process to build 2nd 3GW Plant to go into operation by 2030. This will likely be delivered by the winner of the first plants’ integrated reactor.
Long Term: 10 years +
Decommissioning & Waste Management
Slovakia
New Build: Construction of Mochovce 3 and 4 began in 1985, but halted in 1992 due to shortfall of finances. In 2006, Italian ENEL S.p.A. privatised 66% of SE a.s., and in November 2008 the construction resumed. Decomissioning&Waste Management: The state-owned company JAVYS is in charge of decommissioning the two units of V1 Jaslovské Bohunice NPP. Total costs of the V1 shutdown were calculated at EUR 1.1 billion. The V1’s two reactors should be definitively decommissioned in 2025.
EUR 9,000 M Opportunities for UK Businesses
New Build: Rosatom had an intergovernmental 'agreement' with BG Govt to build 2 x VVER 1000 (AES'92) reactors at Belene. Project was cancelled in 2012. Current Govt talk about restarting project. Life Extension: 20 year life extension on Russian VVER 1000 reactors. Project funded by Kozloduy NPP out of own funds. Reactors licence expires in 2017 & 2019 - so work needs to begin ASAP. Works Plan submitted to Nuclear Regulator in Dec 2013. Decommissioning Waste Management: Decommissioning four VVER reactors at Kozloduy site. Funding from EU via EBRD to support decommissiong work. Construction and management of low to intermediate waste disposal facility near Kozloduy site.
2 new PWR nuclear power blocks (1,200 MW each) at the Paks nuclear power plant as a priority project, the new blocks could be ready to go online in 10-15 years. Rosatom will build the new blocks and provide 30-year euro loan for the construction. 40% of the work is to go to Hungarian suppliers and further subcontracting opportunities will be subject to public procurement.
Life Extension: Ongoing project for 20 year life extension of 4 existing blocks (VVER-440 design), works in Unit 1 has already been started. Capacity after power upgrading: 4x500 MW. Following the lifetime extension, the units are expected to operate until 2032 to 2037. Decomissioning&Waste Management: Final disposal facility for low- and intermediate-level wastes (L/ILW), and extension of the existing Interim Spent Fuel Storage (ISFS) and the selection of a site for the long-lived high level waste (HLW) repository and related design, research and development tasks. Financial & Legal Services: Consultation service: financing the new build project in Paks.
New Build: Slovenia has good experience with nuclear energy and is seriously considering building 2nd Nuclear Reactor at Krško with 1000-1200 MW power. Financial plan is not yet in place. The Slovenian Govt is looking closely at HPC State Aid case. Life Extension: To extend operating life of Krsko (Westinghouse PWR). A number of criteria have to be met (period safety review every 10 years, programmes to ensure comprehensive control over active and passive components, technology upgrade etc.). Decomissioning&Waste Management: Slovenia's nuclear programme is the smallest in the world, cooperation with Croatia as the co-owner of the PP is logical. Consensus will need to be reached soon. Geological research and safety analysis is in progress.
The Republic of Croatia has previous nuclear experience and belongs to a group of countries that use nuclear power for energy purposes.
Prevlaka NPP actually was a part of bilateral agreement from 1970 about joint construction of two NPPs – one in Slovenia, and another one in Croatia. Although Slovenian NPP Krško was succesfully commissioned, project of the first NPP in Croatia was terminated due to Chernobyl accident at the stage when the bidding process was almost completed.
Anyway, Positive influence of NPP Krško construction and operation is, to some extent still present in the Croatian industry through periodical participation in outages and other plant’s activities.
Owner……………………..GEN Energija- 50% and HEP -50%
Operator ………………… Nuklearna elektrarna Krško
NSSS supplier…………...Westinghouse
Reactor type…………….PWR
Construction permit……1975
Commercial operation…1983
Operating license……….40 years
Number of employees….~600
Gross plant output………. 727 MW
字行距
加上总公司
右边摆正
右边摆正
右边摆正
右边摆正
右边摆正
右边摆正
右边摆正
右边摆正
右边摆正
右边摆正
右边摆正
右边摆正
右边摆正
按邮件修改
按邮件修改
按邮件修改
按邮件修改
按邮件修改
按邮件修改
按邮件修改
按邮件修改
按邮件修改
按邮件修改
(1) PWR complexity has gone up, while BWR complexity has gone down and (2) BWRs have always been safest in their class.
Here is a chart showing the Probabilistic Risk Assessment of the expected frequency of core damage of various reactor designs, starting with the current Generation II designs: The current U.S. PWR’s fleet average CDF is calculated to be 2x10-5. The U.S. BWR fleet’s average calculated CDF is significantly lower, at 8x10-6. Current generation III designs, with the exception of the EPR and ABWR, also fall into the same order of magnitude of Generation II BWRs – 10-6. ABWR is the safest Generation III design, having a core damage frequency of 2x10-7. EPR follows ABWR in terms of safety, based on the industry’s accepted standard measure of reactor design safety – core damage frequency. Generation III+ reactors implement full passive safety. ESBWR raises the bar of nuclear plant safety with an estimated core damage frequency of 2x10-8 – a full order of magnitude lower than the AP-1000 and EPR. ESBWR estimated core damage frequency is a full three orders of magnitude lower than the current U.S. PWR fleet.
The diagrams of reactor designs, with the BWRs in blue and the PWRs in red, show how BWRs have grown in simplicity of design, while PWRs have actually grown in complexity. Simplification leads to easier operation, less challenging construction, less radiation dose to workers, and greater safety.
BWR reactor design has evolved and grown in simplicity through each design by reducing the smaller external pumps and recirculation loops, until the ABWR actually eliminated the recirculation loops by using integrally forged 10 Reactor Internal Pumps directly in the bottom of the vessel – thereby eliminating the external piping and valves. This significantly reduced complexity, and a major source of personnel dose to the workers. Taking this simplicity a step further, the ESBWR utilizes full natural circulation in driving flow through the reactor core, so there are no internal or external pumps.
Some might tell you that the being the first of a kind means the project will be late.
We don’t accept that premise. In fact, we have built many units that were first of a kinds, that were not late. At TEPCO, the first….next slide
We have developed an efficient, repeatable execution model to construct nuclear power plants on-schedule and on-budget with the upmost safety. Detailed engineering before on-site work, modularization, and open-top & parallel construction are the three pillars of our execution strategy. Application of these technology tools and techniques has resulted in real and substantial improvements in the construction of nuclear power plants.
Detailed engineering before on-site work has drastically improved site work efficiency … avoiding the design changes and expensive and time-consuming site rework that has been a common contributor to construction delays and budget overages.
Modularization techniques have been optimize to reduce on-site work, resulting in higher quality components, safer work environments, and cost savings from the reduction of on-site work and efficiency of factory production.
Open-top & parallel construction was developed in Japan, and is the key to leveling work on-site … it critical to maintaining efficient use of the on-site manpower and preventing and minimizing schedule delays.
CUW: reactor water Clean-Up system
CD: Condensate Demineralizer
OG: Off Gas
This shows installation work of RCCV upper drywell module which is the heaviest one installed in Reactor Building. It weighs 610MT.
ABWR to go into operation was Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Unit 6, in 1996. With 14 years of operation, it was a first of a kind Generation III reactor.
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa #6 was completed in 39 months from first structural concrete to fuel loading
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa #7: 39 months
Both of these plants survived a beyond-design basis earthquake several years ago, and are back up and operating today.
Hamaoka #5 was completed in 43 months and was a first of a kind 60Hz ABWR. These 4 ABWRs were built on-time and on-schedule. These are the only Generation III or III+ reactors to be operated, generating a ‘fleet’ of operating data and a now impressive installed base, starting in 1996.
Shika #2 was completed in 44 months and was the first built with advanced construction and modularization techniques.
Shimane #3, with commercial operation to occur in 2011, has seen no schedule delays at all, scheduled for first structural concrete to fuel loading to be completed in 42 months.
Ohma is being constructed and will be the first ABWR to go online with a full MOX core.
Finally, Lungmen 1, scheduled to being operating in 2011 followed by Unit 2, is the first ABWR, and the first Generation III or III+ nuclear plant, to be constructed to U.S. codes and standards.
The ABWR is certified in three countries (U.S., Japan, and Taiwan), and the ESBWR is on its way to be certified in the US.
Safer than any reactor on the market
Passive air-cooling – no operator or mechanical actions needed
Loss of coolant accidents not possible due to pool-type design
Based on USG’s proven EBR-II design
Operated safely for 30 years
Can being the process of licensing and building TODAY
Capability to safely disposition plutonium – offers numerous advantages to MOX reprocessing:
safer, quicker, and produces NEW electricity
Currently under consideration by UK’s Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA)
Backup:
PRISM without recycling does not eliminate plutonium/waste – it makes it safer and more proliferation resistant (higher radiotoxicity, high volume/mass (hard to steal, easy to secure) )
Used nuclear fuel recycling comparison:
MOX reprocessing vs. PRISM full recycling:
MOX fuel requires 10,000 years of safe storage; PRISM- Advanced Recycling Center waste only requires 300 years of safe storage
MOX separates out pure plutonium during the reprocessing; PRISM/ARC does not
PRISM generates new electricity, MOX supports existing nuclear capacity
We believe ABWR and ESBWR present the two best options for new Swiss nuclear plants. ABWR and ESBWR are the safest plant designs (#1, and #2) in the world based on the industry standard for plant safety – core damage frequency based on probabilistic risk assessment of the plant design.
ABWR:
The only advanced Gen III technology in operation today
Licensed in 3 countries
4 ABWRs in operation today
4 ABWRs under construction Best in class CDF
ESBWR:
Generation III+ design further leverages ABWR innovations
Natural circulation principles
Passive safety design
Completing NRC certification – to be completed by Sept. 2011
Strong global interest
Industry best CDF
GE Hitachi has been innovating for nearly 60 years … we’re looking forward to building 21st century reactor technologies that will power the world for another 60 years with ESBWR and PRISM.
1957 - Vallecitos was the first BWR and the first privately financed nuclear plant in the world
1960 - Dresden was the first privately financed nuclear plant in the world; the first commercial BWR
1969 - Oyster Creek BWR/2 was the 1st large-scale nuclear plant in the United States
1969 – Humboldt Bay was a 65 megawatt natural circulation boiling water reactor with Atomic Energy Commission License #7. Provides a basis for ESBWR design, startup and operation.
1996 – Kashiwazaki-Kariwa 6&7 were the first ABWRs
Looking forward to the first ESBWR at North Anna 3 in Virginia and the first PRISM reactor possibly in the UK.