SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 22
1 
Tyler Michael Howard 
March 20, 2013 
HIST 475 
Dr. Hoefferle 
Communism in the Charlotte Metro Area 
The issue of Communism has always been one of great debate. Many considered 
Communism to be a threat to American capitalism while others seen Communism as a savior for 
equality and blue collared workers. This research project looks at the history of the North 
Carolina Communist Party in the Charlotte Metro area. According to secondary sources wrote on 
the history of the American Communist Party (Draper, Klehr, Taylor) The American Communist 
Party was one of the most radical organizations of its time and North Carolina was a leader for 
Communism spreading into the Southern United States. Looking at Communist supported 
newspapers (Southern Worker, Workers Age, Daily Worker, and The Militant) as well as local 
Anti-Communist views (The Charlotte Observer) show there was a prevalent Communist 
influence in Charlotte. Charlotte was a hotbed of Communist activity for a brief period in the 
1930’s into the early 1940’s, but it quickly declined because of anticommunist pressure and 
internal disagreements. 
Communism has been entrenched in the United States for almost a century. According to 
Theodore Draper, a historian and author breaks down the early workings of American 
Communism in the book The Roots of American Communism. The American Communist Party 
got its start in the early 1920s from the October Revolution that occurred in Russia in 1917.1 The 
1 Theodore Draper, The Roots of American Communism. (New York, 1957) pgs. 135-138
2 
American Communist Party originated in New York, but during the late 1920s and early 1930s, 
it began to move into the Southern half of the United States.2 Draper focuses on the American 
Communist Party’s relationship to the Soviet Union. The Comintern held documents, letters, 
and other sources of information tying CPSU and CPUSA together which were held in Russia 
for storage. Draper goes into great detail over the propaganda that the American Communist 
Party distributed to the public. The Daily Worker was the primary source of media to the public 
for party information. The newspaper, based in New York publicized information about the 
American Communist Party on a national level. The Daily Worker also reached out on a 
regional level to Northern as well as Southern States, including Charlotte and Monroe, North 
Carolina. Draper goes into detail about the secrecy of the CPUSA as well as integration of races 
in the South.3 Integrating the white working class with African American sharecroppers was a 
key for the American Communist Party to achieve full effectiveness in the South. This North 
Carolina was selected as one of the prominent southern states for Communism. North Carolina 
was the capital of the American textile industry with the Piedmont area as its core.4 Charlotte 
was not only the biggest metropolitan city in the state and was located in the center of the state 
making it easily accessible through travel. Draper does well in examining the Communist Party 
on a national level and explains the relationship of the American Communist Party with the 
Soviet Union from a top down approach. Draper’s book does little to revel about the Communist 
Party within Charlotte, North Carolina. 
Harvey Klehr professor of history at Emory University takes a look at what the purpose 
was of the American Communist Party and the struggles they went through in establishing 
operations on American soil during the 1940s and 1950s. Klehr explains the objectives of the 
2 Theodore Draper, The Roots of American Communism. (New York, 1957) pgs. 153-174 
3 Theodore Draper, The Roots of American Communism. (New York, 1957) pgs. 207-213 
4 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009)
3 
CPUSA and what they aimed to accomplish on a local, regional, and national scale. In his 
research Klehr sheds light onto the mysterious workings of American Communism and 
underground labor organizing. The American Communist Party is forced to go underground due 
to investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and to the ongoing effects of the 
Cold War.5 Support for the party all but disappeared with the coming of the Cold War and a 
spike in American Patriotism. Communism was seen as sleeping with the enemy by many 
Americans because of the ongoing Cold War conflict. Klehr focuses on documents shared 
between the CPUSA and CPSU from the newly opened Comintern in Moscow.6 These 
documents show that the Soviet Union guided the American Communist Party in much of their 
decision making. While Klehr details Communist underground activity throughout the United 
States, Klehr does not focus regionally on North Carolina or go into detail on Communism in 
Charlotte. 
William Foster was the National Chairman of the American Communist Party following 
WWII in 1946.7 He was tried for trying to overthrow the United States Government because of 
his association with the American Communist Party from 1922 to 1923. He is portrayed in the 
trial by the prosecution as a radical training the working class of America to hate their 
employers. Foster is seen as planning a Red Revolution similar to that of Vladimir Lenin in the 
October Revolution in Russia. What this trial shows is a consensus of how the American 
Communist Party is viewed; a radical leftist group seeking a violent overthrow of the American 
Government. Capitalism versus Communism was on the main stage. Foster can be seen as the 
last figurehead for the American Communist Party. He attempted to fully integrate the South. 
William Z. Foster was loved and hated by many of his comrades. Junius Scales, who was a 
5 Harvey Klehr, The Secret World of American Communism. (New York, 1995) pgs. 195-198 
6 Harvey Klehr, The Secret World of American Communism. (New York, 1995) pgs 207-212 
7 Minor, Robert. "The Trial of William Z. Foster." The Liberator, sec. v.6 no.4, April 1923.
4 
prominent North Carolina Communist Party member quotes Foster in an interview saying “he 
was twice as dangerous as the textbook Communist.”8 The trial was very similar to the trial of 
Junius Scales in Charlotte in the fact that the verdict was overwhelmingly against the 
Communists. This shows a connection between national views and Charlotte views of Anti- 
Communism. 
Alex Bittleman was a leading American Communist Party member acting under William 
Foster. In his pamphlet The Party and the People’s Front, Bittelman outlines what he believes 
will help build the Party into an effective leader for the working class. In the pamphlet, 
Bittelman not only looks at Capitalism as an enemy, but more specifically the Republican Party. 
Democrats have begun to take a more progressive approach with the response to WWII. 
Browder and Bittelman share similar views on the direction of the party. Both believe in a level 
of cooperation with the government in regards to the Fascists and war; however, the principles of 
the party remained potent.9 Bittelman acted under the Foster administration but sought to abide 
by Browder’s ideologies. Foster and Browder had different paths for American Communism. 
This shows the beginnings of party divisions. Bittelman talks of party movement and mass 
growth in conjunction with the spread of Communism by way of propaganda and cooperation 
with other Progressive parties.10 
In regards to North Carolina, Communists followed the approach laid out by Bittleman. 
Communists aligned themselves with American Federation of Labor (A.F.L), Congress of 
Industrial Workers (C.I.O), and National Textile Workers Union (N.T.W.U) to gain progressive 
support and appeal to the factory workers concentrated in the state. Meetings with these 
8 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, 
May 2, 1987:1-7 
9 Bittleman, Alex, The Party and the Peoples Front, (1937) 
10 Bittleman, Alex, The Party and the Peoples Front, (1937)
5 
organizations occurred in Charlotte with the NTWU having headquarters based out of Charlotte. 
The divisions in party direction became apparent with the close of WWII. 
John Gates was a renowned American Communist Journalist and former editor of The 
Daily Worker. In his pamphlet titled On Guard Against Browderism Titoism Trotskyism, Gates 
talks about the influence of former American Communist Party chairmen Earl Browder had went 
against the good of the party and became tied to American imperialism. “Browderism” had 
begun to affect other Communist Party members throughout the states including in Charlotte 
according to Gates. Browder had begun to try and separate the CPUSA away from the Soviet 
Union. Browder had labeled Stalin a danger to Communism and the goals of a Communist 
social world. Gates stated that Browder goes as far as blaming the Korean conflict and Chinese 
aggression on Stalin and the Soviet influence. 11 Gates sites that Browder had gone against all 
that Communism stands for and had attempted to lead the party into a merger with the 
imperialistic capitalist powers. In the pamphlet, Gates goes on to say that Browder has 
undermined his fellow comrades in acting as a “stool-pigeon”12 for the capitalists on Wall Street 
in trials such as Frederick vs. Field. There is talk of the faction between Earl Browder and his 
eventual successor William Z. Foster. Browder proclaimed that Foster was allegedly put into 
power as National Party Chairman by European Communist leaders. Gates stated that it was in 
the full interest of the American Communist Party and its members. A key issue that is brought 
up once again is the issue of “The Negro Question”13. This issue is of upmost importance to 
Charlotte because it raises questions of success of the CPUSA in North Carolina and the 
Southern United States. Gates says Browder avoids the issue of integration within the Party. 
Gates goes on to describe how Browder believes that African Americans have “integrated into 
11 Gates, John. On Guard against Browderism Titoism Trotskyism. (1951) 
12 Gates, John. On Guard against Browderism Titoism Trotskyism. (1951) pg.7 
13 Gates, John. On Guard against Browderism Titoism Trotskyism. (1951) pg. 8
6 
American life and have been freed of feudal survival.”14 Gates points toward the American 
South and cites segregation, lower wages, and uneven land distribution as a counter to Browder’s 
views. Seeing from the letters to the editor in The Southern Worker, this conclusion by Gates 
can be seen as fact. The pamphlet backs up the argument that the divisions amongst the 
members of the CPUSA led to its eventual demise. The Party members were divided on the 
issues of integration and relation to the Soviet Union. Gates cites that there is disloyalty amongst 
the comrades without naming names other than Earl Browder. This pamphlet describes the 
issues that occurred in Charlotte during the late 1940s and into the 1950s. Scales makes note of 
several of these issues in his interview with Kortstad. The question of integrating is one that 
burdened the Communists in Charlotte. The recruitment of African Americans was seen to be 
necessary for the growth of the party; however, their role in the party was one of question. 
Other historians have written histories of the American Communist Party in specific 
southern states. For example, Robin Kelley, a historian at UCLA focuses on Communism in the 
state of Alabama. Kelley’s book Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists During the Great 
Depression takes a look at Communism within the state of Alabama. Alabama for much of the 
20th century was a center of racial segregation, but the Communists were able to use segregation 
as a tool to recruit many African Americans into the party.15 There was also a large immigrant 
population within the state because of the need of sharecroppers for farming. The reason that the 
Communists in Alabama were able to succeed was because of their ability to take action and 
protest. Communists were able to unite their goals with many of the poor whites as well as 
oppressed blacks and form strong coalitions to take on capitalist oppression as well the issue of 
14 Gates, John. On Guard against Browderism Titoism Trotskyism. (1951) pgs. 14-15 
15 Kelley, Robin D. G. Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists During the Great Depression. University of North 
Carolina Press, 1990.
7 
race.16 The party was able to establish relationships with many left-wing radical liberals as well 
as the younger population of Alabama.17 Being able to unite under one common goal was rare 
for the CPUSA; especially being able to align liberal, whites, and blacks all together. This could 
be considered to be one of the shining moments of the American Communist Party’s success in 
the Deep South. Communists in Charlotte used many of the same tactics that were employed to 
recruiting African Americans into the party. While Charlotte was not as racially segregated as 
Alabama, Charlotte did face many of the same obstacles and stiff opposition from Anti- 
Communists.18 
In the essay Mobilizing the Reserve Army: The Communist Party and the Unemployed in 
Atlanta, 1929–1934, historian James Lorence goes into detail about the Communist Party in 
Atlanta during the Great Depression and through the 1940s. Lorence emphasizes integrating 
blacks and whites together. The focus of the Communist Party was the tenants and shantytowns 
of Atlanta being able to unite a force of impoverished blacks together with poor whites working 
in the factories.19 The CPUSA believed that if they were able to integrate the two together, then 
they would have enough power to take over in the city. The Communists were unable to attain 
these goals because of the inability to fight through the issue of segregation with many of the 
white factory workers as well as other pressing issues occurring in different areas of the United 
States. The issue of white chauvinism was apparent in Atlanta with fear of white workers being 
replaced by blacks for cheaper wages. 
16 Kelley, Robin D. G. Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists During the Great Depression. University of North 
Carolina Press, 1990. 
17 Kelley, Robin D. G. Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists During the Great Depression. University of North 
Carolina Press, 1990. 
18 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) 
19 James J. Lorence, Radicalism in the South Since Reconstruction: Mobilizing the Reserve Army: Communist Party 
and the Unemployed in Atlanta, 1929.” (New York, 2006)pgs 50-51
8 
The cities of Charlotte and Atlanta were two major foundations from incorporating the 
Communist Party into the South. Both cities were major industrial hubs for factory workers and 
textile production. Communists in North Carolina worked in conjunction with Atlanta regarding 
recruiting, unemployment, and the trial of Angelo Herndon.20 Prominent NCCP members such as 
Paul Crouch were involved in working on the Angel Herndon trial. Fighting for the freedom and 
equality of workers was what the Communist sought to achieve in the Angel Herndon trial and to 
show that Herndon was falsely convicted by the capitalist system. Charlotte experienced the 
same obstacles that Atlanta did with stiff Anti-Communist opposition and the issue of 
segregation. 
Gregory Taylor, a professor of history at Chowan University focuses on the regional 
North Carolina Communist Party in his book The History of the North Carolina Communist 
Party.21 Taylor goes into great detail of how the North Carolina Communist Party (NCCP) 
operated. His book specifically looks at the reasons why the American Communist Party wanted 
to establish itself in the state of North Carolina. Gregory includes the Loray Mill Strike, the 
Kissing Case, as well as other cases dealing with labor strikes.22 Taylor explains how the process 
that the North Carolina Communist Party tried to unite both the white and black working class 
behind labor unions and were quite successful in Charlotte and Winston Salem, North Carolina.23 
Both cities laid the fundamental foundation for spreading Communism into the Southern United 
States. 
20 James J. Lorence, Radicalism in the South Since Reconstruction: Mobilizing the Reserve Army: Communist Party 
and the Unemployed in Atlanta, 1929.” (New York, 2006) 
21 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) 
22 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) 
pgs. 66-69 
23 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) 
pgs. 49-52
9 
Taylor goes into great detail about the NCCP’s inability to attract the workers of North 
Carolina. The NCCP reached out to workers who were underpaid and overworked by their 
superiors. Charlotte was home to many court cases involving Communist Party members. This 
gave notoriety to the region. Court cases in the Charlotte area show that the Communist defense 
teams were more concerned with spreading the ideology of the party than defending accused 
members.24 Taylor argues that the issue of religion was one of the major drawbacks for the 
NCCP as well as the CPUSA as a whole. Many Communists claimed to be atheist and this did25 
not go over well with much of the population of the South, who were predominantly Southern 
Baptist. Charlotte was and still is a deeply Christian conservative city. The NCCP, like the 
CPUSA, also had contact with the Soviet Union. North Carolina Communists modeled 
themselves after the CPSU; but also wanted some form of individuality. For example, the NCCP 
protested lynching and Jim Crow Laws, and demanded equal representation for whites, blacks, 
and other minorities such as women.26 Taylor’s book shows the impact of Communism not only 
within North Carolina, but also major metropolitan cities within the state. While Taylor does 
mention Charlotte as a base for activity by the NCCP, he does not devote great detail into the 
city of Charlotte, but rather the NCCP and its effects on the state of North Carolina as a whole. 
Newspapers and pamphlets were primary sources of Communist Party information. The 
Southern Worker is a newspaper that was published by the CPUSA for the Southeastern United 
States published from 1930 up into 1938. The Southern Worker can be seen by many as the most 
effective tool used by the American Communist Party in its quest to reach out to the public 
24 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) 
pgs 42-48 
25 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) 
pgs 50-55 
26 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) 
pgs.125-132
10 
forum of the South. One of the main focuses of The Southern Worker was to spread the 
Communist ideology as well as make negative comments on the spread of American 
capitalism.27 In reference to North Carolina, the paper focused on the trial of the Loray Mills 
Strike in 1929 up into the 1930. The trial took place in Charlotte which brought added publicity 
to the region. The Southern Worker also noted events that involved the Communist Party in the 
Charlotte area. For example the National Textile Workers Union coming to hold a meeting on 
14th street in North Charlotte in 1931.28 The CPUSA believed that it was paramount for 
individuals to follow the principles of Communism in order to be a “textbook Communist.”29 
This quote was used by Junius Scales, who was the head regional organizer in the Charlotte 
Metro area to describe prominent members such William Foster. With Scales being a leader of 
the North Carolina Communist Party disagreements were held between the National CPUSA and 
organizers such as Scales in Charlotte. This would foreshadow events that would transpire later 
into the 1950 s with the crumbling of NCCP and CPUSA. 
Charlotte was mentioned frequently in The Southern Worker. The paper covered the 
entire state of North Carolina, but Charlotte is a primary focus for the paper. In the paper, 
meetings are documented with Communist Party members and NTWU organizers headquartered 
in Charlotte. 30 Prominent NCCP members such as Fred Beal, Paul Crouch and Junius Scales 
were featured in the paper. Fred Beal was a head NTWU organizer who came to Charlotte from 
New York to organize workers for strike in the Loray Mill in Gastonia. Beal played a key role in 
organizing workers into unions in Charlotte and surrounding areas. Paul Crouch wrote many 
27 Jack, London. "The Iron Heel." The Daily Worker, 1934. 
28 The Southern Worker, V.2, No.2 (1931) 
29 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, 
May 2, 1987:1-7. 
30 Crouch, Paul. “Textiles Strike Again” The Southern Worker (1936)
11 
stories for the paper, including articles on the rise of the textile unions in Charlotte.31 The paper 
showed the progressive steps that the party was making within the Charlotte Area. The Southern 
Workers shows that progress was made within North Carolina and Charlotte in the 1930s. An 
article from the paper details 3,000 workers pushing back Charlotte Mecklenburg Police in the 
streets trying to break up a meeting.32 Communist party members ran for election for county 
seats on city council. 33 The Southern Worker detailed progress made by the Communists in 
Charlotte as well as other areas of North Carolina. The Southern Worker shows that Charlotte 
indeed had a Communist presence in the late 1920s and throughout the 1930s. 
In conjunction with The Southern Worker, there was a letters to the editor section in 
which subscribers could list their grievances to the writers of the paper. There were a few letters 
sent in from Communist members in Charlotte detailing working and living conditions in the 
area in the 1930s. The letters goes into detail about the rent strikes going on in the early 1930s 
by unemployed workers who struggled to survive because of the Great Depression and 
struggling economy.34 Landlords were described as coming to homes and ripping off doors and 
boarding up windows.35 The woman writing the letter happened to be African American which 
shows the racial segregation boundary within the city. According to the woman, who remained 
anonymous, The Southern Worker gave her the strength to fight back against the landlord to 
keep what was rightfully hers. These workers were forced to improvise doing menial work in 
order to sustain a living. Organizations such as the National Textile Workers Union and Trade 
Union Unity League offered workers hope that the Communists would bring relief to the 
31 The Southern Worker, V.1, No.2 (1930) 
32 The Southern Worker, V.1, No.3 (1930) 
33 The Southern Worker, V.5, No.12 (1937) 
34 “Resists and Wins Against Her Eviction” The Southern Worker Letters to the Editor (1931) 
35 “Resists and Wins Against Her Eviction” The Southern Worker Letters to the Editor (1931)
12 
working class and unemployed around Charlotte. Through the turmoil, the African American 
women wished for freedom of oppression for black and white workers.36 
Another Letter to the Editor from The Southern Worker shows the living conditions in 
Charlotte from a Southern Worker correspondent. The correspondent looks at life for 
unemployed workers forced to farm because unemployment during the early 1930s. Many 
unemployed workers such as the family described in the letter were left with rent that was 
impossible to pay while being unemployed. Rent prices were not the only concern as many 
families struggled to feed their children.37 While the father and sons plowed the fields, the wife 
was forced to pick blackberries for the evening supper. Without work in the mills and factories 
in Charlotte, life was hard for the unemployed. The family’s housing was poor as it leaked when 
it rained making for below standard living conditions.38 The wife proclaimed that this was the 
sorriest place she had seen in North Carolina showing the terrible living conditions in Charlotte 
which many were subjected to live.39 Workers were ready for reform and sought refuge under 
the banner of equality that the Communists proclaimed within Charlotte. 
The Militant was a left-wing Communist paper based out New York that covered North 
Carolina and the Southern United States. The paper wrote from a more radical perspective than 
that of The Southern Worker but gave detailed information to the public on Communist Party 
activity regionally. Charlotte was mentioned frequently in The Militant. The paper described the 
moving in of the American Federation of Labor into Charlotte as a potential disaster.40 Cities 
such as Charlotte and Salisbury were holding AFL meetings to promote social insurances and 
36 “50 Year-Old Negro Woman Set for Fight” The Southern Worker Letters to the Editor (1931) 
37 “Farmer Takes Place of Mule at Plow” The Southern Worker Letters to the Editior (1931) 
38 “Farmer Takes Place of Mule at Plow” The Southern Worker Letters to the Editior (1931) 
39 “Farmer Takes Place of Mule at Plow” The Southern Worker Letters to the Editior (1931) 
40 The Militant (1932)
13 
organize the wage earners of the South.41 With the entrance of the AFL into Charlotte, 
differences became apparent among Communists in the area. The AFL represented blue-collared 
white factory workers with less attention paid to African Americans. Writers for The Militant 
such as Jay Lovestone criticized the AFL saying it was a group made up of bureaucrats 
employing the laws of capitalism amongst the working class.42 The Militant was critical of the 
direction of the Communist Party during the 1930s and into the 1940s believing the Party was 
drifting away from original ideals. With the start of WWII, unemployment declined forcing 
Communists to look for other means of protest such as racial equality. 
The NCCP faced considerable opposition from Anti-Communists in the form of The 
Charlotte Observer. The Charlotte Observer a newspaper based in Charlotte was one of the 
leaders in covering Communist Party activity in the Carolinas. The newspaper focused on the 
trails such as the Loray Mill Strike trial of 1929 and General Textile strike trial of 1934 dealing 
with Communist Party members. Textile mill strikes and labor union organizing were also 
covered extensively within the city.43 The Observer stayed on top of Communist activity that 
was going on throughout the area amplifying Communists as enemies of the state. The paper 
was the main source of information within the Charlotte region and the Observer takes a strong 
conservative stance. The Communist Party seen Republicans as “Fascist” in the words of 
William Z. Foster44. Such phrases as “Commy Bastards” and “traitors” could be found in some 
instances.45 The Charlotte Observer also reached out to the surrounding rural counties which 
were comprised of poor, working class farmers and mill workers. With the popularity of The 
Charlotte Observer, the North Carolina Communists were unable to overthrow conservative 
41 “A.F.ofL. Opens up in the South” The Militant (1930) 
42 “A.F.ofL. Opens up in the South” The Militant (1930) 
43 “The Reds Say,” The Charlotte Observer (1931) 
44 William Foster, "Party Building and Political Leadership," Workers Library Publishers (1937): 45-62, 
45 “The Reds Say,” The Charlotte Observer (1931)
14 
views with their propaganda. The Charlotte Observer mentioned the Communists gaining 
momentum in Charlotte. 46 The Charlotte Observer exaggerated the ability of the Communists 
in Charlotte and writes on the idea of the hostile takeover of the nation by radical Communists. 
With the paper being the main source of news for the people of Mecklenburg County and the 
surrounding counties, the paper’s stories were generally believed to be true by much of the 
population. The coming of the Cold War in the late 1940s only amplified the paper and its 
thoughts. 
Communism appealed to many African Americans in North Carolina from the 1930s 
into the late 1940s. James W. Ford was a leading American Communist Party member, and the 
first African American to ever appear on the presidential ticket running alongside William Foster 
for Vice President in 1932, 1936, and 1940. Ford was influential in helping to recruit African 
Americans into the CPUSA from the North and South. In his pamphlet, Developing Negro 
Community Leaders, Ford talks about how Communist ideology has helped lift African 
Americans from the depths of oppression. Ford urged the CPUSA to assimilate African 
American women into leadership positions within the party and solve the problem of “the negro 
question.”47 The question pertains to addressing African Americans and their role within the 
Communist Party. This question dealt especially with Southern states such as North Carolina 
where black and white integration was essential to the Communists success. In Charlotte, 
integration was key with workers to gain support for labor unions. With the National Textile 
Workers Union and American Federation of Labor both pushing for more workers, it was 
paramount for the Communist to integrate within the city to gain more popular support for the 
party. 
46 “Cops Must Admit Reds Growing in Charlotte Area,” The Charlotte Observer (1931) 
47 Ford, James. Developing the Negro Communist Leader. (1937)
15 
Ford believed that women were essential in providing new recruiting outlets within 
communities. He cites the successes of women organizers in healthcare and education. Women 
were widely used as organizers for the Party in Charlotte.48 Moranda Smith and Velma Barfield 
were two women who were active in the recruiting of women and minorities in the Charlotte 
area. Both of these women campaigned strongly against inequality and male chauvinism.49 
Ford states that the problem of the African American people is the lack of knowledge. He states 
that vocational training schools should be constructed in order for African Americans to better 
understand the roots of Communism. Ford was a well known figure in North Carolina. During 
his running on the ticket as vice president through 1936-1944, Ford made stops in North Carolina 
including in Charlotte. Ford aimed to better integrate the minority into the party within North 
Carolina and Charlotte. Ford was unable to fully conquer the obstacle of male chauvinism in the 
Charlotte and North Carolina. This predicates the future decline of Communism in Charlotte in 
the late 1940s and into the 1950s. 
Junius Scales was a regional party organizer in the Charlotte Metro and Triad areas of 
North Carolina. Scales was one of the key figures promoting Communism within Charlotte. 
The interviews give insight onto what was going on into Communist Party around the major 
metropolitan cities in North Carolina. Scales looks at the North Carolina Communist Party and 
its activities that were going on in cities such as Winston-Salem, Charlotte, Greensboro, and 
Asheville after WWII and into the late 1940s before the beginnings of the Cold War conflict. In 
an interview conducted by Robert Korstad, Scales breaks down the Party into specific 
committees located in different regions. Within the committees, Scales describes the role of 
48 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, 
May 2, 1987:3 
49 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, 
May 2, 1987:pgs3-5
16 
trade union workers and minorities working together.50 Committees were broken down into 
eight to ten members and had diversity among its members. Scales says that in Charlotte, there 
were over 200 official members that gathered together.51 Women were very influential within 
the Charlotte region, as they helped to gain support for the minorities and related with the masses 
of the working class oppressed. Moranda Smith and Velma Barfield were two major organizers 
for the Communist Party in Charlotte. Women were politically active within the area and were 
used for organizing movements and recruiting.52 While there was activity going on within 
Charlotte, there was more activity going on in Winston-Salem with unionizing the R.J. Reynolds 
workers. 
In another interview conducted by Robert Korstad, three Communist Party members from 
the Charlotte area are interviewed in Bernard Friedland, Junius Scales, and Karl Korstad. The 
interview gives insight into Communist Party activity within the Charlotte area during the 1940s. 
Friedland and Korstad were both organizers and associates of Scales, who was a head organizer 
within the Charlotte region. Scales speaks about his involvement in WWII and how Bart Logan 
took over as the district organizer during the war.53 Communist volunteers in WWII were 
common because of the involvement of Fascist nations such as Germany and Italy which 
American Communists deemed as enemies to Communist ideals. The involvement of the Soviet 
Union on the side of the Allies made Communists such as Scales from the Charlotte area 
volunteer to support their comrades. Communists who stayed out of service were in charge of 
50 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, 
May 2, 1987:1-7 
51 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, 
May 2, 1987:1-7 
52 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, 
May 2, 1987:1-7 
53 “Interview with Bernard Friedland, Junius Scales, and Karl Korstad” by Robert Korstad. Southern Oral History 
Collection, Record, April 14, 1986: pg 2
17 
handling the domestic affairs of the Party. Friedland and Korstad in working with Logan raised 
support for the Party in the form of women and students.54 The war sent many working class 
men into the armed service, leaving the local Communists with little to recruit from. Friedland 
talked about the issues with the trade unions and organizing within the region. Because the war 
had brought employment to the Charlotte areas textile mills and factories, unions struggled to 
organize workers. With Logan enlisting in the army in 1943, Alice Burke was named the 
organizer in the district.55 Burke was from Virginia and had little experience in North Carolina 
and was unfamiliar with labor organizing within the Charlotte region. Many outsiders began 
coming to Charlotte from states such as Virginia and New York to organize and maintain 
Communist Party stability. With organizers such as Alice Burke and Gene Morse being 
involved in their own state affairs, the Charlotte region was left without a district organizer for 
several months until Scales arrival back from WWII in 1946.56 Scales notes the issue of 
comrades such as Chick showing male chauvinism toward women such as Burke for holding 
important local party positions within the Charlotte region. Anne Matthews who was a secretary 
for the Party turned in over 100 Communist Party names to the FBI within the region.57 
Matthews outlined the structure of the Communist Party and how it was broken down from the 
National Party down to regional and district organizing in areas such as Charlotte. This 
foreshadowed the events that would come with Operation SOLO put into action by the FBI. 
54 “Interview with Bernard Friedland, Junius Scales, and Karl Korstad” by Robert Korstad. Southern Oral History 
Collection, Record, April 14, 1986: pgs. 2-3 
55 “Interview with Bernard Friedland, Junius Scales, and Karl Korstad” by Robert Korstad. Southern Oral History 
Collection, Record, April 14, 1986: pgs 6-7 
56 “Interview with Bernard Friedland, Junius Scales, and Karl Korstad” by Robert Korstad. Southern Oral History 
Collection, Record, April 14, 1986: pgs. 8-9 
57 “Interview with Bernard Friedland, Junius Scales, and Karl Korstad” by Robert Korstad. Southern Oral History 
Collection, Record, April 14, 1986: pgs. 11-13
18 
The end of the Communist era was brought about by Operation SOLO. Operation SOLO 
was initiated by the FBI in order to infiltrate the American Communist Party and tracked its 
relationship with other Communist nations; primarily the Soviet Union. Specific documents 
show the relationship between the CPUSA and the CPSU. The CPUSA had been infiltrated by 
the FBI and the American was made aware of meetings in Moscow as well as China.58 
Prominent Communist Party members such as William Foster and Eugene Dennis were carefully 
observed by the government.59 The main goal of the FBI in the SOLO operation was to 
determine what the Soviet Union was advising the CPUSA to do. It had become apparent that 
the CPUSA did as they were authorized by the Soviet Union.60 Letters and documents were 
intercepted by informants and given to the FBI. This operation succeeded in infiltrating the once 
obscure American Communist Party and learning of its whereabouts. It confirmed suspicion that 
the CPUSA was acting under the supervision of the Soviet Union. Paul Crouch, who was one of 
the founding members of the North Carolina Communist Party, was an informant for the FBI.61 
He gave the whereabouts of Communist leaders and meetings that were held in North Carolina. 
Not only was the FBI able to infiltrate the national party, but also the party on a regional level. 
This brought the question of trust of many of the comrades within NC.62 Communism within NC 
was all but shut down. 
58 Operation SOLO Files, FBI Vault Records, http://us.archives.org/5items/FbiSoloFiles-Mar1958ToAug1960 
59 Operation SOLO Files, FBI Vault Records, http://us.archives.org/5items/FbiSoloFiles-Mar1958ToAug1960 
60 Operation SOLO Files, FBI Vault Records, http://us.archives.org/5items/FbiSoloFiles-Mar1958ToAug1960 
61 Operation SOLO Files, FBI Vault Records, http://us.archives.org/5items/FbiSoloFiles-Mar1958ToAug1960 
62 Operation SOLO Files, FBI Vault Records, http://us.archives.org/5items/FbiSoloFiles-Mar1958ToAug1960
19 
In conclusion to primary and secondary research of Communism in Charlotte, it is 
apparent that Communism was on the rise early into the 1920-1930. The failure of Capitalism to 
bring relief to the working class was an issue Communists were able to take advantage of in the 
Charlotte area. The wide surplus of textile mills with the accessibility to large populations made 
trade unions and labor organizing possible. Communists in Charlotte during the 1930s were able 
to hold meetings and address the issues of unemployment, racial integration, and elections for 
office within the region. This allowed the party to gain momentum in Charlotte. Police were 
unable to suppress workers rallied by members for striking purposes. Evidence shows that the 
Communist Party was at its peak in Charlotte during the 1930s. With the coming of the 1940s 
and after WWII, the party began to lose steam in Charlotte. A profound stance in Conservative 
Anti-Communist policies in Charlotte led to the lack of support for Communism. With the lack 
of popular support brought disagreements to the surface within the Party especially between 
national leaders and regional leaders in Charlotte. The evidence of white male chauvinism rears 
its head, further dividing and segregating the party into the late 1940s. The Cold War further 
divided the Party; and a decline in popular support within the region became apparent. This led 
to eventual defection and infiltration into the once secretive Communist Circle within Charlotte 
as the case of Paul Crouch. Communism was unable to keep any influence in the Charlotte area 
once these disagreements tore the Communist Party apart.
20 
Bibliography 
Bermanzohn, Sally A., and MyiLibrary. Through Survivors’ Eyes from the Sixties to the 
Greensboro Massacre. 1st ed. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2003. 
Breines, Wini. Community and Organization in the New Left, 1962-1968: The Great 
Refusal. Place of publication: Rutgers University Press, 1989. 
Camp, Helen C., and NetLibrary, Inc. Iron in Her Soul Elizabeth Gurley Flynn and the 
American Left. Pullman, Wash: WSU Press, 1995. 
Chafe, William Henry. Civilities and Civil Rights: Greensboro, North Carolina, and the 
Black Struggle for Freedom. Oxford University Press, 1981. 
Draper, Theodore. The Roots of American Communism. Communism in American Life. 
New York: Viking Press, 1957. 
Gregory, Taylor. “The History of the North Carolina Communist Party.” University of 
South Carolina Press. The History of the North Carolina Communist Party, May 
15, 2009.
21 
Howe, Irving. The American Communist Party, a Critical History. Praeger Paperbacks 
PPS-64. New York: Praeger, 1962. 
Kelley, Robin D. G. Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists During the Great 
Depression. The Fred W. Morrison Series in Southern Studies. Chapel Hill: 
University of North Carolina Press, 1990. 
Klehr, Harvey. The Secret World of American Communism. Annals of Communism. 
New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995. 
Michael E., Brown. The Historiography of Communism. First Edition. Philadelphia, PA: 
Temple University Press, 2008. 
Newman, Joseph. Communism and the New Left: What They’re up to Now. Washington: 
Books by U.S. News & World Report, 1969. 
Noyes, John Humphrey. History of American Socialisms. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & 
Co, 1961. 
Radicalism in the South Since Reconstruction. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 
2006. 
Ryan, James G., and NetLibrary, Inc. Earl Browder the Failure of American 
Communism. Tuscaloosa, Ala: University of Alabama Press, 1997. 
http://ezproxy.wingate.edu:2048/login?url=http://www.netlibrary.com/urlapi.asp? 
action=summary&v=1&bookid=39933. 
Starobin, Joseph R. American Communism in Crisis, 1943-1957. Cambridge: Harvard 
University Press, 1972. 
“TRUTH WAS THE LAST STRAW - New York Times.” New York Times. Accessed 
March 12, 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/1987/07/12/books/truth-was-the-last-straw. 
html. 
“Junius Irving Scales Papers, 1940-1978.” Text. Accessed April 4, 2013. 
The Southern Oral History Program 
http://www.lib.unc.edu/mss/inv/s/Scales,Junius_Irving.html. 
The Miltant Newspaper Archives 
http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/themilitant/ 
The Southern Worker Archives 
http://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/southernworker/ 
Workers Age Archives 
http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/serial?id=workersage
22 
The Charlotte Observer Archives 
http://www.cmlibrary.org/locations/maincarolinacollections.asp 
Operation SOLO Files, FBI Vault Records, http://us.archives.org/5items/FbiSoloFiles- 
Mar1958ToAug1960

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Final Paper, US-Paraguayan Relations during the Cold War
Final Paper, US-Paraguayan Relations during the Cold WarFinal Paper, US-Paraguayan Relations during the Cold War
Final Paper, US-Paraguayan Relations during the Cold War
Jay O. Porter
 
United States presidential elections of 1860-1928
United States presidential elections of 1860-1928United States presidential elections of 1860-1928
United States presidential elections of 1860-1928
HistoryExpert006
 
United States presidential elections of 1932-1964
United States presidential elections of 1932-1964United States presidential elections of 1932-1964
United States presidential elections of 1932-1964
HistoryExpert006
 
United States presidential elections of 1968-2012
United States presidential elections of 1968-2012United States presidential elections of 1968-2012
United States presidential elections of 1968-2012
HistoryExpert006
 
James j. martin the pro-red orchestra starts tuning up in the u.s.a., 1941 ...
James j. martin   the pro-red orchestra starts tuning up in the u.s.a., 1941 ...James j. martin   the pro-red orchestra starts tuning up in the u.s.a., 1941 ...
James j. martin the pro-red orchestra starts tuning up in the u.s.a., 1941 ...
RareBooksnRecords
 
The man behind_the_men_behind_the_president-avif-1936-44pgs-pol
The man behind_the_men_behind_the_president-avif-1936-44pgs-polThe man behind_the_men_behind_the_president-avif-1936-44pgs-pol
The man behind_the_men_behind_the_president-avif-1936-44pgs-pol
RareBooksnRecords
 

Was ist angesagt? (19)

Final Paper, US-Paraguayan Relations during the Cold War
Final Paper, US-Paraguayan Relations during the Cold WarFinal Paper, US-Paraguayan Relations during the Cold War
Final Paper, US-Paraguayan Relations during the Cold War
 
Slavery, manifest destiny and abolitionism
Slavery, manifest destiny and abolitionism Slavery, manifest destiny and abolitionism
Slavery, manifest destiny and abolitionism
 
United States presidential elections of 1860-1928
United States presidential elections of 1860-1928United States presidential elections of 1860-1928
United States presidential elections of 1860-1928
 
Events in history12
Events in history12Events in history12
Events in history12
 
Political Assassinations
Political AssassinationsPolitical Assassinations
Political Assassinations
 
United States presidential elections of 1932-1964
United States presidential elections of 1932-1964United States presidential elections of 1932-1964
United States presidential elections of 1932-1964
 
United States presidential elections of 1968-2012
United States presidential elections of 1968-2012United States presidential elections of 1968-2012
United States presidential elections of 1968-2012
 
MX London School of Economics (February 11, 1965)
 MX London School of Economics (February 11, 1965) MX London School of Economics (February 11, 1965)
MX London School of Economics (February 11, 1965)
 
Who Are New Afrikan Political Prisoners and Prisoners of War
Who Are New Afrikan Political Prisoners and Prisoners of WarWho Are New Afrikan Political Prisoners and Prisoners of War
Who Are New Afrikan Political Prisoners and Prisoners of War
 
James j. martin the pro-red orchestra starts tuning up in the u.s.a., 1941 ...
James j. martin   the pro-red orchestra starts tuning up in the u.s.a., 1941 ...James j. martin   the pro-red orchestra starts tuning up in the u.s.a., 1941 ...
James j. martin the pro-red orchestra starts tuning up in the u.s.a., 1941 ...
 
Dnc, Boston 2004 Part Ii
Dnc, Boston 2004 Part IiDnc, Boston 2004 Part Ii
Dnc, Boston 2004 Part Ii
 
Top 25 US Presidents
Top 25 US PresidentsTop 25 US Presidents
Top 25 US Presidents
 
White Papers ( Skull And Bones) By Goldstein & Steinberg
White  Papers ( Skull And  Bones)    By  Goldstein &  SteinbergWhite  Papers ( Skull And  Bones)    By  Goldstein &  Steinberg
White Papers ( Skull And Bones) By Goldstein & Steinberg
 
The Betrayal of the American Right and the Rise of the Neoconservatives, Lect...
The Betrayal of the American Right and the Rise of the Neoconservatives, Lect...The Betrayal of the American Right and the Rise of the Neoconservatives, Lect...
The Betrayal of the American Right and the Rise of the Neoconservatives, Lect...
 
History of famous debates
History of famous debatesHistory of famous debates
History of famous debates
 
The man behind_the_men_behind_the_president-avif-1936-44pgs-pol
The man behind_the_men_behind_the_president-avif-1936-44pgs-polThe man behind_the_men_behind_the_president-avif-1936-44pgs-pol
The man behind_the_men_behind_the_president-avif-1936-44pgs-pol
 
Jacksonian Era
Jacksonian EraJacksonian Era
Jacksonian Era
 
Liberty university hius 222 content quiz 4 complete solutions correct answers...
Liberty university hius 222 content quiz 4 complete solutions correct answers...Liberty university hius 222 content quiz 4 complete solutions correct answers...
Liberty university hius 222 content quiz 4 complete solutions correct answers...
 
Banned for political content
Banned for political contentBanned for political content
Banned for political content
 

Ähnlich wie History Senior Thesis

Reds in america-whitney-1924-288pgs-pol
Reds in america-whitney-1924-288pgs-polReds in america-whitney-1924-288pgs-pol
Reds in america-whitney-1924-288pgs-pol
RareBooksnRecords
 
p a t r i c k j . i b e rWho Will Impose Democracy” Sac.docx
p a t r i c k j . i b e rWho Will Impose Democracy” Sac.docxp a t r i c k j . i b e rWho Will Impose Democracy” Sac.docx
p a t r i c k j . i b e rWho Will Impose Democracy” Sac.docx
alfred4lewis58146
 
McCarthyism & The Crucible
McCarthyism & The CrucibleMcCarthyism & The Crucible
McCarthyism & The Crucible
Michael Maslak
 
Reds in america-r_m_whitney-1924-288pgs-com
Reds in america-r_m_whitney-1924-288pgs-comReds in america-r_m_whitney-1924-288pgs-com
Reds in america-r_m_whitney-1924-288pgs-com
RareBooksnRecords
 
Day 4 red scare.cold war
Day 4 red scare.cold warDay 4 red scare.cold war
Day 4 red scare.cold war
Joseph Fuertsch
 
The Cold War At Home
The Cold War At HomeThe Cold War At Home
The Cold War At Home
JWGibbens
 
Communism in Charlotte
Communism in CharlotteCommunism in Charlotte
Communism in Charlotte
Tyler Howard
 
2The Civil Rights Efforts of John F. KennedyKevin J. Doherty.docx
2The Civil Rights Efforts of John F. KennedyKevin J. Doherty.docx2The Civil Rights Efforts of John F. KennedyKevin J. Doherty.docx
2The Civil Rights Efforts of John F. KennedyKevin J. Doherty.docx
gilbertkpeters11344
 
The Crucible: Historical Context
The Crucible: Historical ContextThe Crucible: Historical Context
The Crucible: Historical Context
shanovitz
 
LIMITED FREE SPEECH IN AMERICA
LIMITED FREE SPEECH IN AMERICALIMITED FREE SPEECH IN AMERICA
LIMITED FREE SPEECH IN AMERICA
guestc48e0c
 
11292015 Printhttpscontent.ashford.eduprintAUHIS206.docx
11292015 Printhttpscontent.ashford.eduprintAUHIS206.docx11292015 Printhttpscontent.ashford.eduprintAUHIS206.docx
11292015 Printhttpscontent.ashford.eduprintAUHIS206.docx
hyacinthshackley2629
 

Ähnlich wie History Senior Thesis (20)

Reds in america-whitney-1924-288pgs-pol
Reds in america-whitney-1924-288pgs-polReds in america-whitney-1924-288pgs-pol
Reds in america-whitney-1924-288pgs-pol
 
McCarthyism
McCarthyismMcCarthyism
McCarthyism
 
p a t r i c k j . i b e rWho Will Impose Democracy” Sac.docx
p a t r i c k j . i b e rWho Will Impose Democracy” Sac.docxp a t r i c k j . i b e rWho Will Impose Democracy” Sac.docx
p a t r i c k j . i b e rWho Will Impose Democracy” Sac.docx
 
McCarthyism & The Crucible
McCarthyism & The CrucibleMcCarthyism & The Crucible
McCarthyism & The Crucible
 
Drugan\'s Class- The Cold War
Drugan\'s Class- The  Cold  WarDrugan\'s Class- The  Cold  War
Drugan\'s Class- The Cold War
 
02 mccarthy and korea
02 mccarthy and korea02 mccarthy and korea
02 mccarthy and korea
 
Reds in america-r_m_whitney-1924-288pgs-com
Reds in america-r_m_whitney-1924-288pgs-comReds in america-r_m_whitney-1924-288pgs-com
Reds in america-r_m_whitney-1924-288pgs-com
 
Day 4 red scare.cold war
Day 4 red scare.cold warDay 4 red scare.cold war
Day 4 red scare.cold war
 
Red Scare Essay
Red Scare EssayRed Scare Essay
Red Scare Essay
 
The Crucible Historical Context and Literary Merit
The Crucible Historical Context and Literary MeritThe Crucible Historical Context and Literary Merit
The Crucible Historical Context and Literary Merit
 
The Cold War At Home
The Cold War At HomeThe Cold War At Home
The Cold War At Home
 
The Red Scare
The Red ScareThe Red Scare
The Red Scare
 
Communism in Charlotte
Communism in CharlotteCommunism in Charlotte
Communism in Charlotte
 
King of America
King of AmericaKing of America
King of America
 
USHIST Chapter 15
USHIST Chapter 15USHIST Chapter 15
USHIST Chapter 15
 
2The Civil Rights Efforts of John F. KennedyKevin J. Doherty.docx
2The Civil Rights Efforts of John F. KennedyKevin J. Doherty.docx2The Civil Rights Efforts of John F. KennedyKevin J. Doherty.docx
2The Civil Rights Efforts of John F. KennedyKevin J. Doherty.docx
 
The Crucible: Historical Context
The Crucible: Historical ContextThe Crucible: Historical Context
The Crucible: Historical Context
 
LIMITED FREE SPEECH IN AMERICA
LIMITED FREE SPEECH IN AMERICALIMITED FREE SPEECH IN AMERICA
LIMITED FREE SPEECH IN AMERICA
 
McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America
McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in AmericaMcCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America
McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America
 
11292015 Printhttpscontent.ashford.eduprintAUHIS206.docx
11292015 Printhttpscontent.ashford.eduprintAUHIS206.docx11292015 Printhttpscontent.ashford.eduprintAUHIS206.docx
11292015 Printhttpscontent.ashford.eduprintAUHIS206.docx
 

History Senior Thesis

  • 1. 1 Tyler Michael Howard March 20, 2013 HIST 475 Dr. Hoefferle Communism in the Charlotte Metro Area The issue of Communism has always been one of great debate. Many considered Communism to be a threat to American capitalism while others seen Communism as a savior for equality and blue collared workers. This research project looks at the history of the North Carolina Communist Party in the Charlotte Metro area. According to secondary sources wrote on the history of the American Communist Party (Draper, Klehr, Taylor) The American Communist Party was one of the most radical organizations of its time and North Carolina was a leader for Communism spreading into the Southern United States. Looking at Communist supported newspapers (Southern Worker, Workers Age, Daily Worker, and The Militant) as well as local Anti-Communist views (The Charlotte Observer) show there was a prevalent Communist influence in Charlotte. Charlotte was a hotbed of Communist activity for a brief period in the 1930’s into the early 1940’s, but it quickly declined because of anticommunist pressure and internal disagreements. Communism has been entrenched in the United States for almost a century. According to Theodore Draper, a historian and author breaks down the early workings of American Communism in the book The Roots of American Communism. The American Communist Party got its start in the early 1920s from the October Revolution that occurred in Russia in 1917.1 The 1 Theodore Draper, The Roots of American Communism. (New York, 1957) pgs. 135-138
  • 2. 2 American Communist Party originated in New York, but during the late 1920s and early 1930s, it began to move into the Southern half of the United States.2 Draper focuses on the American Communist Party’s relationship to the Soviet Union. The Comintern held documents, letters, and other sources of information tying CPSU and CPUSA together which were held in Russia for storage. Draper goes into great detail over the propaganda that the American Communist Party distributed to the public. The Daily Worker was the primary source of media to the public for party information. The newspaper, based in New York publicized information about the American Communist Party on a national level. The Daily Worker also reached out on a regional level to Northern as well as Southern States, including Charlotte and Monroe, North Carolina. Draper goes into detail about the secrecy of the CPUSA as well as integration of races in the South.3 Integrating the white working class with African American sharecroppers was a key for the American Communist Party to achieve full effectiveness in the South. This North Carolina was selected as one of the prominent southern states for Communism. North Carolina was the capital of the American textile industry with the Piedmont area as its core.4 Charlotte was not only the biggest metropolitan city in the state and was located in the center of the state making it easily accessible through travel. Draper does well in examining the Communist Party on a national level and explains the relationship of the American Communist Party with the Soviet Union from a top down approach. Draper’s book does little to revel about the Communist Party within Charlotte, North Carolina. Harvey Klehr professor of history at Emory University takes a look at what the purpose was of the American Communist Party and the struggles they went through in establishing operations on American soil during the 1940s and 1950s. Klehr explains the objectives of the 2 Theodore Draper, The Roots of American Communism. (New York, 1957) pgs. 153-174 3 Theodore Draper, The Roots of American Communism. (New York, 1957) pgs. 207-213 4 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009)
  • 3. 3 CPUSA and what they aimed to accomplish on a local, regional, and national scale. In his research Klehr sheds light onto the mysterious workings of American Communism and underground labor organizing. The American Communist Party is forced to go underground due to investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and to the ongoing effects of the Cold War.5 Support for the party all but disappeared with the coming of the Cold War and a spike in American Patriotism. Communism was seen as sleeping with the enemy by many Americans because of the ongoing Cold War conflict. Klehr focuses on documents shared between the CPUSA and CPSU from the newly opened Comintern in Moscow.6 These documents show that the Soviet Union guided the American Communist Party in much of their decision making. While Klehr details Communist underground activity throughout the United States, Klehr does not focus regionally on North Carolina or go into detail on Communism in Charlotte. William Foster was the National Chairman of the American Communist Party following WWII in 1946.7 He was tried for trying to overthrow the United States Government because of his association with the American Communist Party from 1922 to 1923. He is portrayed in the trial by the prosecution as a radical training the working class of America to hate their employers. Foster is seen as planning a Red Revolution similar to that of Vladimir Lenin in the October Revolution in Russia. What this trial shows is a consensus of how the American Communist Party is viewed; a radical leftist group seeking a violent overthrow of the American Government. Capitalism versus Communism was on the main stage. Foster can be seen as the last figurehead for the American Communist Party. He attempted to fully integrate the South. William Z. Foster was loved and hated by many of his comrades. Junius Scales, who was a 5 Harvey Klehr, The Secret World of American Communism. (New York, 1995) pgs. 195-198 6 Harvey Klehr, The Secret World of American Communism. (New York, 1995) pgs 207-212 7 Minor, Robert. "The Trial of William Z. Foster." The Liberator, sec. v.6 no.4, April 1923.
  • 4. 4 prominent North Carolina Communist Party member quotes Foster in an interview saying “he was twice as dangerous as the textbook Communist.”8 The trial was very similar to the trial of Junius Scales in Charlotte in the fact that the verdict was overwhelmingly against the Communists. This shows a connection between national views and Charlotte views of Anti- Communism. Alex Bittleman was a leading American Communist Party member acting under William Foster. In his pamphlet The Party and the People’s Front, Bittelman outlines what he believes will help build the Party into an effective leader for the working class. In the pamphlet, Bittelman not only looks at Capitalism as an enemy, but more specifically the Republican Party. Democrats have begun to take a more progressive approach with the response to WWII. Browder and Bittelman share similar views on the direction of the party. Both believe in a level of cooperation with the government in regards to the Fascists and war; however, the principles of the party remained potent.9 Bittelman acted under the Foster administration but sought to abide by Browder’s ideologies. Foster and Browder had different paths for American Communism. This shows the beginnings of party divisions. Bittelman talks of party movement and mass growth in conjunction with the spread of Communism by way of propaganda and cooperation with other Progressive parties.10 In regards to North Carolina, Communists followed the approach laid out by Bittleman. Communists aligned themselves with American Federation of Labor (A.F.L), Congress of Industrial Workers (C.I.O), and National Textile Workers Union (N.T.W.U) to gain progressive support and appeal to the factory workers concentrated in the state. Meetings with these 8 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, May 2, 1987:1-7 9 Bittleman, Alex, The Party and the Peoples Front, (1937) 10 Bittleman, Alex, The Party and the Peoples Front, (1937)
  • 5. 5 organizations occurred in Charlotte with the NTWU having headquarters based out of Charlotte. The divisions in party direction became apparent with the close of WWII. John Gates was a renowned American Communist Journalist and former editor of The Daily Worker. In his pamphlet titled On Guard Against Browderism Titoism Trotskyism, Gates talks about the influence of former American Communist Party chairmen Earl Browder had went against the good of the party and became tied to American imperialism. “Browderism” had begun to affect other Communist Party members throughout the states including in Charlotte according to Gates. Browder had begun to try and separate the CPUSA away from the Soviet Union. Browder had labeled Stalin a danger to Communism and the goals of a Communist social world. Gates stated that Browder goes as far as blaming the Korean conflict and Chinese aggression on Stalin and the Soviet influence. 11 Gates sites that Browder had gone against all that Communism stands for and had attempted to lead the party into a merger with the imperialistic capitalist powers. In the pamphlet, Gates goes on to say that Browder has undermined his fellow comrades in acting as a “stool-pigeon”12 for the capitalists on Wall Street in trials such as Frederick vs. Field. There is talk of the faction between Earl Browder and his eventual successor William Z. Foster. Browder proclaimed that Foster was allegedly put into power as National Party Chairman by European Communist leaders. Gates stated that it was in the full interest of the American Communist Party and its members. A key issue that is brought up once again is the issue of “The Negro Question”13. This issue is of upmost importance to Charlotte because it raises questions of success of the CPUSA in North Carolina and the Southern United States. Gates says Browder avoids the issue of integration within the Party. Gates goes on to describe how Browder believes that African Americans have “integrated into 11 Gates, John. On Guard against Browderism Titoism Trotskyism. (1951) 12 Gates, John. On Guard against Browderism Titoism Trotskyism. (1951) pg.7 13 Gates, John. On Guard against Browderism Titoism Trotskyism. (1951) pg. 8
  • 6. 6 American life and have been freed of feudal survival.”14 Gates points toward the American South and cites segregation, lower wages, and uneven land distribution as a counter to Browder’s views. Seeing from the letters to the editor in The Southern Worker, this conclusion by Gates can be seen as fact. The pamphlet backs up the argument that the divisions amongst the members of the CPUSA led to its eventual demise. The Party members were divided on the issues of integration and relation to the Soviet Union. Gates cites that there is disloyalty amongst the comrades without naming names other than Earl Browder. This pamphlet describes the issues that occurred in Charlotte during the late 1940s and into the 1950s. Scales makes note of several of these issues in his interview with Kortstad. The question of integrating is one that burdened the Communists in Charlotte. The recruitment of African Americans was seen to be necessary for the growth of the party; however, their role in the party was one of question. Other historians have written histories of the American Communist Party in specific southern states. For example, Robin Kelley, a historian at UCLA focuses on Communism in the state of Alabama. Kelley’s book Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists During the Great Depression takes a look at Communism within the state of Alabama. Alabama for much of the 20th century was a center of racial segregation, but the Communists were able to use segregation as a tool to recruit many African Americans into the party.15 There was also a large immigrant population within the state because of the need of sharecroppers for farming. The reason that the Communists in Alabama were able to succeed was because of their ability to take action and protest. Communists were able to unite their goals with many of the poor whites as well as oppressed blacks and form strong coalitions to take on capitalist oppression as well the issue of 14 Gates, John. On Guard against Browderism Titoism Trotskyism. (1951) pgs. 14-15 15 Kelley, Robin D. G. Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists During the Great Depression. University of North Carolina Press, 1990.
  • 7. 7 race.16 The party was able to establish relationships with many left-wing radical liberals as well as the younger population of Alabama.17 Being able to unite under one common goal was rare for the CPUSA; especially being able to align liberal, whites, and blacks all together. This could be considered to be one of the shining moments of the American Communist Party’s success in the Deep South. Communists in Charlotte used many of the same tactics that were employed to recruiting African Americans into the party. While Charlotte was not as racially segregated as Alabama, Charlotte did face many of the same obstacles and stiff opposition from Anti- Communists.18 In the essay Mobilizing the Reserve Army: The Communist Party and the Unemployed in Atlanta, 1929–1934, historian James Lorence goes into detail about the Communist Party in Atlanta during the Great Depression and through the 1940s. Lorence emphasizes integrating blacks and whites together. The focus of the Communist Party was the tenants and shantytowns of Atlanta being able to unite a force of impoverished blacks together with poor whites working in the factories.19 The CPUSA believed that if they were able to integrate the two together, then they would have enough power to take over in the city. The Communists were unable to attain these goals because of the inability to fight through the issue of segregation with many of the white factory workers as well as other pressing issues occurring in different areas of the United States. The issue of white chauvinism was apparent in Atlanta with fear of white workers being replaced by blacks for cheaper wages. 16 Kelley, Robin D. G. Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists During the Great Depression. University of North Carolina Press, 1990. 17 Kelley, Robin D. G. Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists During the Great Depression. University of North Carolina Press, 1990. 18 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) 19 James J. Lorence, Radicalism in the South Since Reconstruction: Mobilizing the Reserve Army: Communist Party and the Unemployed in Atlanta, 1929.” (New York, 2006)pgs 50-51
  • 8. 8 The cities of Charlotte and Atlanta were two major foundations from incorporating the Communist Party into the South. Both cities were major industrial hubs for factory workers and textile production. Communists in North Carolina worked in conjunction with Atlanta regarding recruiting, unemployment, and the trial of Angelo Herndon.20 Prominent NCCP members such as Paul Crouch were involved in working on the Angel Herndon trial. Fighting for the freedom and equality of workers was what the Communist sought to achieve in the Angel Herndon trial and to show that Herndon was falsely convicted by the capitalist system. Charlotte experienced the same obstacles that Atlanta did with stiff Anti-Communist opposition and the issue of segregation. Gregory Taylor, a professor of history at Chowan University focuses on the regional North Carolina Communist Party in his book The History of the North Carolina Communist Party.21 Taylor goes into great detail of how the North Carolina Communist Party (NCCP) operated. His book specifically looks at the reasons why the American Communist Party wanted to establish itself in the state of North Carolina. Gregory includes the Loray Mill Strike, the Kissing Case, as well as other cases dealing with labor strikes.22 Taylor explains how the process that the North Carolina Communist Party tried to unite both the white and black working class behind labor unions and were quite successful in Charlotte and Winston Salem, North Carolina.23 Both cities laid the fundamental foundation for spreading Communism into the Southern United States. 20 James J. Lorence, Radicalism in the South Since Reconstruction: Mobilizing the Reserve Army: Communist Party and the Unemployed in Atlanta, 1929.” (New York, 2006) 21 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) 22 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) pgs. 66-69 23 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) pgs. 49-52
  • 9. 9 Taylor goes into great detail about the NCCP’s inability to attract the workers of North Carolina. The NCCP reached out to workers who were underpaid and overworked by their superiors. Charlotte was home to many court cases involving Communist Party members. This gave notoriety to the region. Court cases in the Charlotte area show that the Communist defense teams were more concerned with spreading the ideology of the party than defending accused members.24 Taylor argues that the issue of religion was one of the major drawbacks for the NCCP as well as the CPUSA as a whole. Many Communists claimed to be atheist and this did25 not go over well with much of the population of the South, who were predominantly Southern Baptist. Charlotte was and still is a deeply Christian conservative city. The NCCP, like the CPUSA, also had contact with the Soviet Union. North Carolina Communists modeled themselves after the CPSU; but also wanted some form of individuality. For example, the NCCP protested lynching and Jim Crow Laws, and demanded equal representation for whites, blacks, and other minorities such as women.26 Taylor’s book shows the impact of Communism not only within North Carolina, but also major metropolitan cities within the state. While Taylor does mention Charlotte as a base for activity by the NCCP, he does not devote great detail into the city of Charlotte, but rather the NCCP and its effects on the state of North Carolina as a whole. Newspapers and pamphlets were primary sources of Communist Party information. The Southern Worker is a newspaper that was published by the CPUSA for the Southeastern United States published from 1930 up into 1938. The Southern Worker can be seen by many as the most effective tool used by the American Communist Party in its quest to reach out to the public 24 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) pgs 42-48 25 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) pgs 50-55 26 Gregory S. Taylor, The History of the North Carolina Communist Party. (University of South Carolina Press, 2009) pgs.125-132
  • 10. 10 forum of the South. One of the main focuses of The Southern Worker was to spread the Communist ideology as well as make negative comments on the spread of American capitalism.27 In reference to North Carolina, the paper focused on the trial of the Loray Mills Strike in 1929 up into the 1930. The trial took place in Charlotte which brought added publicity to the region. The Southern Worker also noted events that involved the Communist Party in the Charlotte area. For example the National Textile Workers Union coming to hold a meeting on 14th street in North Charlotte in 1931.28 The CPUSA believed that it was paramount for individuals to follow the principles of Communism in order to be a “textbook Communist.”29 This quote was used by Junius Scales, who was the head regional organizer in the Charlotte Metro area to describe prominent members such William Foster. With Scales being a leader of the North Carolina Communist Party disagreements were held between the National CPUSA and organizers such as Scales in Charlotte. This would foreshadow events that would transpire later into the 1950 s with the crumbling of NCCP and CPUSA. Charlotte was mentioned frequently in The Southern Worker. The paper covered the entire state of North Carolina, but Charlotte is a primary focus for the paper. In the paper, meetings are documented with Communist Party members and NTWU organizers headquartered in Charlotte. 30 Prominent NCCP members such as Fred Beal, Paul Crouch and Junius Scales were featured in the paper. Fred Beal was a head NTWU organizer who came to Charlotte from New York to organize workers for strike in the Loray Mill in Gastonia. Beal played a key role in organizing workers into unions in Charlotte and surrounding areas. Paul Crouch wrote many 27 Jack, London. "The Iron Heel." The Daily Worker, 1934. 28 The Southern Worker, V.2, No.2 (1931) 29 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, May 2, 1987:1-7. 30 Crouch, Paul. “Textiles Strike Again” The Southern Worker (1936)
  • 11. 11 stories for the paper, including articles on the rise of the textile unions in Charlotte.31 The paper showed the progressive steps that the party was making within the Charlotte Area. The Southern Workers shows that progress was made within North Carolina and Charlotte in the 1930s. An article from the paper details 3,000 workers pushing back Charlotte Mecklenburg Police in the streets trying to break up a meeting.32 Communist party members ran for election for county seats on city council. 33 The Southern Worker detailed progress made by the Communists in Charlotte as well as other areas of North Carolina. The Southern Worker shows that Charlotte indeed had a Communist presence in the late 1920s and throughout the 1930s. In conjunction with The Southern Worker, there was a letters to the editor section in which subscribers could list their grievances to the writers of the paper. There were a few letters sent in from Communist members in Charlotte detailing working and living conditions in the area in the 1930s. The letters goes into detail about the rent strikes going on in the early 1930s by unemployed workers who struggled to survive because of the Great Depression and struggling economy.34 Landlords were described as coming to homes and ripping off doors and boarding up windows.35 The woman writing the letter happened to be African American which shows the racial segregation boundary within the city. According to the woman, who remained anonymous, The Southern Worker gave her the strength to fight back against the landlord to keep what was rightfully hers. These workers were forced to improvise doing menial work in order to sustain a living. Organizations such as the National Textile Workers Union and Trade Union Unity League offered workers hope that the Communists would bring relief to the 31 The Southern Worker, V.1, No.2 (1930) 32 The Southern Worker, V.1, No.3 (1930) 33 The Southern Worker, V.5, No.12 (1937) 34 “Resists and Wins Against Her Eviction” The Southern Worker Letters to the Editor (1931) 35 “Resists and Wins Against Her Eviction” The Southern Worker Letters to the Editor (1931)
  • 12. 12 working class and unemployed around Charlotte. Through the turmoil, the African American women wished for freedom of oppression for black and white workers.36 Another Letter to the Editor from The Southern Worker shows the living conditions in Charlotte from a Southern Worker correspondent. The correspondent looks at life for unemployed workers forced to farm because unemployment during the early 1930s. Many unemployed workers such as the family described in the letter were left with rent that was impossible to pay while being unemployed. Rent prices were not the only concern as many families struggled to feed their children.37 While the father and sons plowed the fields, the wife was forced to pick blackberries for the evening supper. Without work in the mills and factories in Charlotte, life was hard for the unemployed. The family’s housing was poor as it leaked when it rained making for below standard living conditions.38 The wife proclaimed that this was the sorriest place she had seen in North Carolina showing the terrible living conditions in Charlotte which many were subjected to live.39 Workers were ready for reform and sought refuge under the banner of equality that the Communists proclaimed within Charlotte. The Militant was a left-wing Communist paper based out New York that covered North Carolina and the Southern United States. The paper wrote from a more radical perspective than that of The Southern Worker but gave detailed information to the public on Communist Party activity regionally. Charlotte was mentioned frequently in The Militant. The paper described the moving in of the American Federation of Labor into Charlotte as a potential disaster.40 Cities such as Charlotte and Salisbury were holding AFL meetings to promote social insurances and 36 “50 Year-Old Negro Woman Set for Fight” The Southern Worker Letters to the Editor (1931) 37 “Farmer Takes Place of Mule at Plow” The Southern Worker Letters to the Editior (1931) 38 “Farmer Takes Place of Mule at Plow” The Southern Worker Letters to the Editior (1931) 39 “Farmer Takes Place of Mule at Plow” The Southern Worker Letters to the Editior (1931) 40 The Militant (1932)
  • 13. 13 organize the wage earners of the South.41 With the entrance of the AFL into Charlotte, differences became apparent among Communists in the area. The AFL represented blue-collared white factory workers with less attention paid to African Americans. Writers for The Militant such as Jay Lovestone criticized the AFL saying it was a group made up of bureaucrats employing the laws of capitalism amongst the working class.42 The Militant was critical of the direction of the Communist Party during the 1930s and into the 1940s believing the Party was drifting away from original ideals. With the start of WWII, unemployment declined forcing Communists to look for other means of protest such as racial equality. The NCCP faced considerable opposition from Anti-Communists in the form of The Charlotte Observer. The Charlotte Observer a newspaper based in Charlotte was one of the leaders in covering Communist Party activity in the Carolinas. The newspaper focused on the trails such as the Loray Mill Strike trial of 1929 and General Textile strike trial of 1934 dealing with Communist Party members. Textile mill strikes and labor union organizing were also covered extensively within the city.43 The Observer stayed on top of Communist activity that was going on throughout the area amplifying Communists as enemies of the state. The paper was the main source of information within the Charlotte region and the Observer takes a strong conservative stance. The Communist Party seen Republicans as “Fascist” in the words of William Z. Foster44. Such phrases as “Commy Bastards” and “traitors” could be found in some instances.45 The Charlotte Observer also reached out to the surrounding rural counties which were comprised of poor, working class farmers and mill workers. With the popularity of The Charlotte Observer, the North Carolina Communists were unable to overthrow conservative 41 “A.F.ofL. Opens up in the South” The Militant (1930) 42 “A.F.ofL. Opens up in the South” The Militant (1930) 43 “The Reds Say,” The Charlotte Observer (1931) 44 William Foster, "Party Building and Political Leadership," Workers Library Publishers (1937): 45-62, 45 “The Reds Say,” The Charlotte Observer (1931)
  • 14. 14 views with their propaganda. The Charlotte Observer mentioned the Communists gaining momentum in Charlotte. 46 The Charlotte Observer exaggerated the ability of the Communists in Charlotte and writes on the idea of the hostile takeover of the nation by radical Communists. With the paper being the main source of news for the people of Mecklenburg County and the surrounding counties, the paper’s stories were generally believed to be true by much of the population. The coming of the Cold War in the late 1940s only amplified the paper and its thoughts. Communism appealed to many African Americans in North Carolina from the 1930s into the late 1940s. James W. Ford was a leading American Communist Party member, and the first African American to ever appear on the presidential ticket running alongside William Foster for Vice President in 1932, 1936, and 1940. Ford was influential in helping to recruit African Americans into the CPUSA from the North and South. In his pamphlet, Developing Negro Community Leaders, Ford talks about how Communist ideology has helped lift African Americans from the depths of oppression. Ford urged the CPUSA to assimilate African American women into leadership positions within the party and solve the problem of “the negro question.”47 The question pertains to addressing African Americans and their role within the Communist Party. This question dealt especially with Southern states such as North Carolina where black and white integration was essential to the Communists success. In Charlotte, integration was key with workers to gain support for labor unions. With the National Textile Workers Union and American Federation of Labor both pushing for more workers, it was paramount for the Communist to integrate within the city to gain more popular support for the party. 46 “Cops Must Admit Reds Growing in Charlotte Area,” The Charlotte Observer (1931) 47 Ford, James. Developing the Negro Communist Leader. (1937)
  • 15. 15 Ford believed that women were essential in providing new recruiting outlets within communities. He cites the successes of women organizers in healthcare and education. Women were widely used as organizers for the Party in Charlotte.48 Moranda Smith and Velma Barfield were two women who were active in the recruiting of women and minorities in the Charlotte area. Both of these women campaigned strongly against inequality and male chauvinism.49 Ford states that the problem of the African American people is the lack of knowledge. He states that vocational training schools should be constructed in order for African Americans to better understand the roots of Communism. Ford was a well known figure in North Carolina. During his running on the ticket as vice president through 1936-1944, Ford made stops in North Carolina including in Charlotte. Ford aimed to better integrate the minority into the party within North Carolina and Charlotte. Ford was unable to fully conquer the obstacle of male chauvinism in the Charlotte and North Carolina. This predicates the future decline of Communism in Charlotte in the late 1940s and into the 1950s. Junius Scales was a regional party organizer in the Charlotte Metro and Triad areas of North Carolina. Scales was one of the key figures promoting Communism within Charlotte. The interviews give insight onto what was going on into Communist Party around the major metropolitan cities in North Carolina. Scales looks at the North Carolina Communist Party and its activities that were going on in cities such as Winston-Salem, Charlotte, Greensboro, and Asheville after WWII and into the late 1940s before the beginnings of the Cold War conflict. In an interview conducted by Robert Korstad, Scales breaks down the Party into specific committees located in different regions. Within the committees, Scales describes the role of 48 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, May 2, 1987:3 49 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, May 2, 1987:pgs3-5
  • 16. 16 trade union workers and minorities working together.50 Committees were broken down into eight to ten members and had diversity among its members. Scales says that in Charlotte, there were over 200 official members that gathered together.51 Women were very influential within the Charlotte region, as they helped to gain support for the minorities and related with the masses of the working class oppressed. Moranda Smith and Velma Barfield were two major organizers for the Communist Party in Charlotte. Women were politically active within the area and were used for organizing movements and recruiting.52 While there was activity going on within Charlotte, there was more activity going on in Winston-Salem with unionizing the R.J. Reynolds workers. In another interview conducted by Robert Korstad, three Communist Party members from the Charlotte area are interviewed in Bernard Friedland, Junius Scales, and Karl Korstad. The interview gives insight into Communist Party activity within the Charlotte area during the 1940s. Friedland and Korstad were both organizers and associates of Scales, who was a head organizer within the Charlotte region. Scales speaks about his involvement in WWII and how Bart Logan took over as the district organizer during the war.53 Communist volunteers in WWII were common because of the involvement of Fascist nations such as Germany and Italy which American Communists deemed as enemies to Communist ideals. The involvement of the Soviet Union on the side of the Allies made Communists such as Scales from the Charlotte area volunteer to support their comrades. Communists who stayed out of service were in charge of 50 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, May 2, 1987:1-7 51 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, May 2, 1987:1-7 52 Scales Junius, interview by Robert Kortstad, "Junius Scales Interview," Southern Oral History Collection, Record, May 2, 1987:1-7 53 “Interview with Bernard Friedland, Junius Scales, and Karl Korstad” by Robert Korstad. Southern Oral History Collection, Record, April 14, 1986: pg 2
  • 17. 17 handling the domestic affairs of the Party. Friedland and Korstad in working with Logan raised support for the Party in the form of women and students.54 The war sent many working class men into the armed service, leaving the local Communists with little to recruit from. Friedland talked about the issues with the trade unions and organizing within the region. Because the war had brought employment to the Charlotte areas textile mills and factories, unions struggled to organize workers. With Logan enlisting in the army in 1943, Alice Burke was named the organizer in the district.55 Burke was from Virginia and had little experience in North Carolina and was unfamiliar with labor organizing within the Charlotte region. Many outsiders began coming to Charlotte from states such as Virginia and New York to organize and maintain Communist Party stability. With organizers such as Alice Burke and Gene Morse being involved in their own state affairs, the Charlotte region was left without a district organizer for several months until Scales arrival back from WWII in 1946.56 Scales notes the issue of comrades such as Chick showing male chauvinism toward women such as Burke for holding important local party positions within the Charlotte region. Anne Matthews who was a secretary for the Party turned in over 100 Communist Party names to the FBI within the region.57 Matthews outlined the structure of the Communist Party and how it was broken down from the National Party down to regional and district organizing in areas such as Charlotte. This foreshadowed the events that would come with Operation SOLO put into action by the FBI. 54 “Interview with Bernard Friedland, Junius Scales, and Karl Korstad” by Robert Korstad. Southern Oral History Collection, Record, April 14, 1986: pgs. 2-3 55 “Interview with Bernard Friedland, Junius Scales, and Karl Korstad” by Robert Korstad. Southern Oral History Collection, Record, April 14, 1986: pgs 6-7 56 “Interview with Bernard Friedland, Junius Scales, and Karl Korstad” by Robert Korstad. Southern Oral History Collection, Record, April 14, 1986: pgs. 8-9 57 “Interview with Bernard Friedland, Junius Scales, and Karl Korstad” by Robert Korstad. Southern Oral History Collection, Record, April 14, 1986: pgs. 11-13
  • 18. 18 The end of the Communist era was brought about by Operation SOLO. Operation SOLO was initiated by the FBI in order to infiltrate the American Communist Party and tracked its relationship with other Communist nations; primarily the Soviet Union. Specific documents show the relationship between the CPUSA and the CPSU. The CPUSA had been infiltrated by the FBI and the American was made aware of meetings in Moscow as well as China.58 Prominent Communist Party members such as William Foster and Eugene Dennis were carefully observed by the government.59 The main goal of the FBI in the SOLO operation was to determine what the Soviet Union was advising the CPUSA to do. It had become apparent that the CPUSA did as they were authorized by the Soviet Union.60 Letters and documents were intercepted by informants and given to the FBI. This operation succeeded in infiltrating the once obscure American Communist Party and learning of its whereabouts. It confirmed suspicion that the CPUSA was acting under the supervision of the Soviet Union. Paul Crouch, who was one of the founding members of the North Carolina Communist Party, was an informant for the FBI.61 He gave the whereabouts of Communist leaders and meetings that were held in North Carolina. Not only was the FBI able to infiltrate the national party, but also the party on a regional level. This brought the question of trust of many of the comrades within NC.62 Communism within NC was all but shut down. 58 Operation SOLO Files, FBI Vault Records, http://us.archives.org/5items/FbiSoloFiles-Mar1958ToAug1960 59 Operation SOLO Files, FBI Vault Records, http://us.archives.org/5items/FbiSoloFiles-Mar1958ToAug1960 60 Operation SOLO Files, FBI Vault Records, http://us.archives.org/5items/FbiSoloFiles-Mar1958ToAug1960 61 Operation SOLO Files, FBI Vault Records, http://us.archives.org/5items/FbiSoloFiles-Mar1958ToAug1960 62 Operation SOLO Files, FBI Vault Records, http://us.archives.org/5items/FbiSoloFiles-Mar1958ToAug1960
  • 19. 19 In conclusion to primary and secondary research of Communism in Charlotte, it is apparent that Communism was on the rise early into the 1920-1930. The failure of Capitalism to bring relief to the working class was an issue Communists were able to take advantage of in the Charlotte area. The wide surplus of textile mills with the accessibility to large populations made trade unions and labor organizing possible. Communists in Charlotte during the 1930s were able to hold meetings and address the issues of unemployment, racial integration, and elections for office within the region. This allowed the party to gain momentum in Charlotte. Police were unable to suppress workers rallied by members for striking purposes. Evidence shows that the Communist Party was at its peak in Charlotte during the 1930s. With the coming of the 1940s and after WWII, the party began to lose steam in Charlotte. A profound stance in Conservative Anti-Communist policies in Charlotte led to the lack of support for Communism. With the lack of popular support brought disagreements to the surface within the Party especially between national leaders and regional leaders in Charlotte. The evidence of white male chauvinism rears its head, further dividing and segregating the party into the late 1940s. The Cold War further divided the Party; and a decline in popular support within the region became apparent. This led to eventual defection and infiltration into the once secretive Communist Circle within Charlotte as the case of Paul Crouch. Communism was unable to keep any influence in the Charlotte area once these disagreements tore the Communist Party apart.
  • 20. 20 Bibliography Bermanzohn, Sally A., and MyiLibrary. Through Survivors’ Eyes from the Sixties to the Greensboro Massacre. 1st ed. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2003. Breines, Wini. Community and Organization in the New Left, 1962-1968: The Great Refusal. Place of publication: Rutgers University Press, 1989. Camp, Helen C., and NetLibrary, Inc. Iron in Her Soul Elizabeth Gurley Flynn and the American Left. Pullman, Wash: WSU Press, 1995. Chafe, William Henry. Civilities and Civil Rights: Greensboro, North Carolina, and the Black Struggle for Freedom. Oxford University Press, 1981. Draper, Theodore. The Roots of American Communism. Communism in American Life. New York: Viking Press, 1957. Gregory, Taylor. “The History of the North Carolina Communist Party.” University of South Carolina Press. The History of the North Carolina Communist Party, May 15, 2009.
  • 21. 21 Howe, Irving. The American Communist Party, a Critical History. Praeger Paperbacks PPS-64. New York: Praeger, 1962. Kelley, Robin D. G. Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists During the Great Depression. The Fred W. Morrison Series in Southern Studies. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990. Klehr, Harvey. The Secret World of American Communism. Annals of Communism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995. Michael E., Brown. The Historiography of Communism. First Edition. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2008. Newman, Joseph. Communism and the New Left: What They’re up to Now. Washington: Books by U.S. News & World Report, 1969. Noyes, John Humphrey. History of American Socialisms. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & Co, 1961. Radicalism in the South Since Reconstruction. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. Ryan, James G., and NetLibrary, Inc. Earl Browder the Failure of American Communism. Tuscaloosa, Ala: University of Alabama Press, 1997. http://ezproxy.wingate.edu:2048/login?url=http://www.netlibrary.com/urlapi.asp? action=summary&v=1&bookid=39933. Starobin, Joseph R. American Communism in Crisis, 1943-1957. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972. “TRUTH WAS THE LAST STRAW - New York Times.” New York Times. Accessed March 12, 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/1987/07/12/books/truth-was-the-last-straw. html. “Junius Irving Scales Papers, 1940-1978.” Text. Accessed April 4, 2013. The Southern Oral History Program http://www.lib.unc.edu/mss/inv/s/Scales,Junius_Irving.html. The Miltant Newspaper Archives http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/themilitant/ The Southern Worker Archives http://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/southernworker/ Workers Age Archives http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/serial?id=workersage
  • 22. 22 The Charlotte Observer Archives http://www.cmlibrary.org/locations/maincarolinacollections.asp Operation SOLO Files, FBI Vault Records, http://us.archives.org/5items/FbiSoloFiles- Mar1958ToAug1960