2. At the end of the year the Foundation faced some significant challenges:
Poor reputation
Declining membership
Falling bitcoin prices
Very bad balance sheet
January 2014 close – $5.2mm
January 2015 close – $463k
In spite of this we have made significant progress in turning around the
financial situation with consistent month/month revenue growth and declines
in operating loss
There is an outside chance that March could be the Foundation’s first
cash-flow positive month since the earliest days of the Foundation
The Foundation’s reputation has been steadily improving in the business
community although some uncertainty remains due to Board elections
However, despite improvement in the business processes and functioning of
the organization there are some remaining structural challenges that may
prove insurmountable without some fundamental changes to the organization
Current situation
4. Total Revenue Trend by Category
December 2014 does not include $25K in kind membership from Perkins Coie
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
Jul 14 Aug 14 Sep 14 Oct 14 Nov 14 Dec 14 Jan 15 Feb 15
Fcst
Dona ons
Speaking Engagements
Conferences
Membership
5. Membership Revenue Trend
December 2014 does not include $25K in kind membership from Perkins Coie
-
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
Jul 14 Aug 14 Sep 14 Oct 14 Nov 14 Dec 14 Jan 15 Feb 15
Fcst
6. Net Operating Loss Trend
December 2014 does not include $25K in kind membership or $87K credit in legal expense
from Perkins Coie negotiation
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
Jul 14 Aug 14 Sep 14 Oct 14 Nov 14 Dec 14 Jan 15 Feb 15
Fcst
7. The organization as currently structured is better suited to a 501(c)4 promotional
organization and not an engineering team. People willing to invest the large amounts
needed to fund engineering want the ability to direct funding without the reputational
or management risk of an elected board. Large donors don’t want to commit significant
capital to an org where they must share 50% control of their funds with members who
pay as little as $25.
The IRS has indicated that our 501(c)6 status may be in jeopardy if we are directly
funding software development and advancing a specific product (Bitcoin Core). We can
transition to a 501(c)4 without penalty if focus is purely promotion, education and
community development.
To continue funding an engineering team within the Foundation we will need a
significant infusion of cash or potentially be insolvent in ~8 weeks. The total addressable
market for fundraising in the current configuration appears to be $500-750k or $1.25-
1.5mm short of our current minimum operating budget. Therefore, significant
restructuring is required to best align funders interests with Foundation goals and needs.
To best position the Foundation for success and ensure adequate funding is available to
support Core Development, we recommend splitting the organization into two separate
entities:
• The Bitcoin Foundation v2.0 - 501(c)4
• New Co. for Bitcoin Core engineering team
Challenges and opportunity
8. Bitcoin Foundation, Inc. – 501(c)6
Bitcoin Foundation roles
Bitcoin Core
development
Bitcoin standards body
Bitcoin promotion
Linux Foundation approach
9. Dividing up the roles
Development NewCo
(Bitcoin Core engineering team)
Bitcoin Standards Body
Bitcoin Foundation, Inc. - 501(c)4
(Promotion & Community)
Credibility and resource sharingOutreach, promotion and
fundraising
Mozilla approach
10. Promotional org supported by membership base
• Continue DevCore conference series with projected net income
of ~$150K in 2015
• Partner for big tent event “Bitcoin 2015” - no expense outlay
required and revenue share potential is ~$75K
• Audience agreement would remain in place providing free PR
and participation in the first major positive image branding
effort for bitcoin
• Foundation can still lead ongoing funding efforts for NewCo
through issuance of technical grants via Lighthouse and
traditional efforts
• Minimal staffing required:
• ED/Outreach Director responsible for overall org and
running DevCore
• Part-time bookkeeper
• Outsourced web/technical support
• Gavin and Patrick would remain engaged
Bitcoin Foundation v2.0
11. New Co. for Core Development
• Form new entity focused on engineering resources for Bitcoin
Core software project
• Fundraising led by Patrick and Gavin would target to bring in at
least $2M
• NewCo will be structured to specifically meet the needs of
highest value contributors in terms of oversight of their funds,
must likely through direct board representation
• Existing technical development team would move to new org
(Gavin, Wladimir, Cory) with additional hires planned
• NewCo would continue to support DevCore and other
promotional and community efforts
• Lead Standards efforts – continue engagement with Alliances
New Co. for Core Development
16. Summary
Moving the Foundation from a “Linux Foundation” model to a “Mozilla” model
provides the best possible avenue for success for promotional and community
efforts and the technical development of Bitcoin Core
DevCore and new conference partnership for Bitcoin 2015 provide viable
business model for the Foundation to remain a going concern and support
existing membership base
Creating NewCo for engineering team opens up access to direct fundraising
both independently and through Foundation grants. Also, it resolves
uncertainty from the IRS treatment of the 501(c)6
With such a short runway, restructuring activities would need to take place by
the end of March