SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 4
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
3/17/2016 Grades ­ AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161) ­ UMUC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/main.d2l?ou=129993 1/4
AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation
(2161)
Course Home Content Discussions Assignments My Tools Resources Roster Help
PrintGrades
Grade Items
Grade Item Points Weight Achieved Grade Feedback
Week 1
Discussion
Activity
90 / 100 4.5 / 5 90 % Individual Feedback:
90 percent
Outstanding Contributor: Responses were submitted, on time,
for all of the conference topics. Comments were consistently
responsive to the conference assignments and significantly
enhanced the quality of the classroom discussion (i.e.,
illustrated a point with examples, suggested new perspectives
on an issues, asked questions that helped stimulate further
discussion, etc.). Ideas were always expressed in a clear and
coherent manner. Contributions reflect exceptional preparation.
Ideas are nearly always important and provide one or more
major insights as well as providing a fruitful direction for the
class. Arguments are well substantiated, persuasively
presented, and properly cited in text and with references.
Participates very frequently throughout the conference week.
Responds to more than 2 posts of other students in a
substantive way. Comments or questions provided evidence
that the participant had read and considered a substantial
number of classmate postings before responding.
Good submission of scholarly articles in your presentation.
Good presentation and explanation of CRM.
Week 2-3
Discussion
Activity
91 / 100 9.1 / 10 91 % Individual Feedback:
91 percent
Outstanding Contributor: Responses were submitted, on time,
for all of the conference topics. Comments were consistently
responsive to the conference assignments and significantly
enhanced the quality of the classroom discussion (i.e.,
illustrated a point with examples, suggested new perspectives
on an issues, asked questions that helped stimulate further
discussion, etc.). Ideas were always expressed in a clear and
coherent manner. Contributions reflect exceptional preparation.
Tyler Anton     AMBA 650 9040 Marketi...  
3/17/2016 Grades ­ AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161) ­ UMUC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/main.d2l?ou=129993 2/4
Ideas are nearly always important and provide one or more
major insights as well as providing a fruitful direction for the
class. Arguments are well substantiated, persuasively
presented, and properly cited in text and with references.
Participates very frequently throughout the conference week.
Responds to more than 2 posts of other students in a
substantive way. Comments or questions provided evidence
that the participant had read and considered a substantial
number of classmate postings before responding.
Good presentation on Apple and artificial intelligence.
Week 4
Case Study
90 / 100 9 / 10 90 % Individual Feedback:
90 percent
Superior analysis: Identifies all or most of the key issues
presented by the case. Discussion of issues reflects strong
critical thinking and analytical skill. Discussion/analysis makes
all or most of the recommendations called for by the case
issues. Recommendations are supported by data from all or
most of the relevant case facts and exhibits data. Data are
creatively manipulated and applied. Discussion and
recommendations are presented clearly, logically, and
succinctly with no or few grammatical or other errors.
Discussion/analysis reflects strong understanding of principles
presented in course readings/materials. Where relevant,
discussion/analysis employs proper APA style. Length
limitations and other form/format requirements (if any) are
followed.
A SWOT analysis and references would have strengthen your
submission.
Good presentation of the alternative solutions of the the three
issues and solution.
PA WK1-5 90 / 100 7.2 / 8 90 % Individual Feedback:
90 percent
An excellent PA paper based on your experience as an intern at
MedImmune. Your work was timely, you interacted well with
others, and you covered the topics adequately, mostly using
references as appropriate. You met the basic objective of the
assignment and the course. You also effectively related
marketing management principles to real life situations.
Week 5-6
Discussion
Activity
92 / 100 9.2 / 10 92 % Individual Feedback:
92 percent
Outstanding Contributor: Responses were submitted, on time,
for all of the conference topics. Comments were consistently
3/17/2016 Grades ­ AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161) ­ UMUC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/main.d2l?ou=129993 3/4
responsive to the conference assignments and significantly
enhanced the quality of the classroom discussion (i.e.,
illustrated a point with examples, suggested new perspectives
on an issues, asked questions that helped stimulate further
discussion, etc.). Ideas were always expressed in a clear and
coherent manner. Contributions reflect exceptional preparation.
Ideas are nearly always important and provide one or more
major insights as well as providing a fruitful direction for the
class. Arguments are well substantiated, persuasively
presented, and properly cited in text and with references.
Participates very frequently throughout the conference week.
Responds to more than 2 posts of other students in a
substantive way. Comments or questions provided evidence
that the participant had read and considered a substantial
number of classmate postings before responding.
Good explanation of how Alphabet did enhance brand equity.
Week 7
Case Study
91 / 100 9.1 / 10 91 % Individual Feedback:
91 percent
Superior analysis: Identifies all or most of the key issues
presented by the case. Discussion of issues reflects strong
critical thinking and analytical skill. Discussion/analysis makes
all or most of the recommendations called for by the case
issues. Recommendations are supported by data from all or
most of the relevant case facts and exhibits data. Data are
creatively manipulated and applied. Discussion and
recommendations are presented clearly, logically, and
succinctly with no or few grammatical or other errors.
Discussion/analysis reflects strong understanding of principles
presented in course readings/materials. Where relevant,
discussion/analysis employs proper APA style. Length
limitations and other form/format requirements (if any) are
followed.
Good application of Exhibit 5.
Good addition of the on a side note.
Week 8-9
Discussion
Activity
91 / 100 9.1 / 10 91 % Individual Feedback:
91 percent
Outstanding Contributor: Responses were submitted, on time,
for all of the conference topics. Comments were consistently
responsive to the conference assignments and significantly
enhanced the quality of the classroom discussion (i.e.,
illustrated a point with examples, suggested new perspectives
on an issues, asked questions that helped stimulate further
discussion, etc.). Ideas were always expressed in a clear and
coherent manner. Contributions reflect exceptional preparation.
Ideas are nearly always important and provide one or more
major insights as well as providing a fruitful direction for the
3/17/2016 Grades ­ AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161) ­ UMUC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/main.d2l?ou=129993 4/4
class. Arguments are well substantiated, persuasively
presented, and properly cited in text and with references.
Participates very frequently throughout the conference week.
Responds to more than 2 posts of other students in a
substantive way. Comments or questions provided evidence
that the participant had read and considered a substantial
number of classmate postings before responding.
Good analysis of the comparison of Wal-Mart to Amazon.
PA WK 6-9 90 / 100 6.3 / 7 90 % Individual Feedback:
90 percent
An excellent PA paper based on your experience as an intern at
MedImmune. Your work was timely, you interacted well with
others, and you covered the topics adequately, mostly using
references as appropriate. You met the basic objective of the
assignment and the course. You also effectively related
marketing management principles to real life situations.
New
Product
Service
Marketing
Plan
91 / 100 27.3 / 30 91 % Individual Feedback:
91 percent
The market plan length was 26 pages that was in excess of the
syllabus stated length of 25 pages. The executive summary met
the criteria of being concise, brief and represents the essential
aspect of the plan. The conclusion met the accepted criteria.
APA standards were also met with no spelling or grammar
errors and references were also properly cited.
The inclusion of tables charts and the SWOT analysis enhanced
the submission.
Overall an excellent paper.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Collaborative Assessment: Working Together Toward Institutional Change
Collaborative Assessment: Working Together Toward Institutional ChangeCollaborative Assessment: Working Together Toward Institutional Change
Collaborative Assessment: Working Together Toward Institutional Change
Elizabeth Nesius
 
Session 3 ppt 2012
Session 3 ppt 2012Session 3 ppt 2012
Session 3 ppt 2012
blfargo
 

Was ist angesagt? (15)

Collaborative Assessment: Working Together Toward Institutional Change
Collaborative Assessment: Working Together Toward Institutional ChangeCollaborative Assessment: Working Together Toward Institutional Change
Collaborative Assessment: Working Together Toward Institutional Change
 
The art and science of holistic nursing – nurs 3371 holistic
The art and science of holistic nursing – nurs 3371 holistic The art and science of holistic nursing – nurs 3371 holistic
The art and science of holistic nursing – nurs 3371 holistic
 
Ech 435 full course
Ech 435 full courseEch 435 full course
Ech 435 full course
 
Session 3 ppt 2012
Session 3 ppt 2012Session 3 ppt 2012
Session 3 ppt 2012
 
University of derby online learning www.derby.ac
University of derby online learning www.derby.acUniversity of derby online learning www.derby.ac
University of derby online learning www.derby.ac
 
Laos Session 5: Analysing Test Items using Classical Test Theory (CTT)
Laos Session 5: Analysing Test Items using Classical Test Theory (CTT)Laos Session 5: Analysing Test Items using Classical Test Theory (CTT)
Laos Session 5: Analysing Test Items using Classical Test Theory (CTT)
 
Course code bco121 bcn1962 course name ethics in business ta
Course code bco121 bcn1962 course name ethics in business   taCourse code bco121 bcn1962 course name ethics in business   ta
Course code bco121 bcn1962 course name ethics in business ta
 
New SP coaching for induction 1 2013
New SP coaching for induction 1 2013New SP coaching for induction 1 2013
New SP coaching for induction 1 2013
 
Discussion 1 what jurisdiction have you chosen to focus your rese
Discussion 1 what jurisdiction have you chosen to focus your reseDiscussion 1 what jurisdiction have you chosen to focus your rese
Discussion 1 what jurisdiction have you chosen to focus your rese
 
Assignment cover sheet course name promoting physical
Assignment cover sheet course name promoting physicalAssignment cover sheet course name promoting physical
Assignment cover sheet course name promoting physical
 
Apus assignment rubric lower level undergraduate 300 400 courses
Apus assignment rubric lower level undergraduate 300 400 coursesApus assignment rubric lower level undergraduate 300 400 courses
Apus assignment rubric lower level undergraduate 300 400 courses
 
Elements of emotional intelligence in leadership to prepare for
Elements of emotional intelligence in leadership to prepare for Elements of emotional intelligence in leadership to prepare for
Elements of emotional intelligence in leadership to prepare for
 
Textbook!!organizational behavior a practical, problem solving a
Textbook!!organizational behavior a practical, problem solving aTextbook!!organizational behavior a practical, problem solving a
Textbook!!organizational behavior a practical, problem solving a
 
Rubrics sb
Rubrics sbRubrics sb
Rubrics sb
 
Portfolio based assessments
Portfolio based assessmentsPortfolio based assessments
Portfolio based assessments
 

Andere mochten auch

Marketing plan umuc amba 650
Marketing plan umuc amba 650Marketing plan umuc amba 650
Marketing plan umuc amba 650
Kristen Bryer
 
Mar com marketing plan trimtek (final for review)
Mar com marketing plan trimtek (final for review)Mar com marketing plan trimtek (final for review)
Mar com marketing plan trimtek (final for review)
Kristen Bryer
 
pmwj46-May2016-Complexities-of-Programme-Management-Trans-ASEAN-Gas-Pipeline-...
pmwj46-May2016-Complexities-of-Programme-Management-Trans-ASEAN-Gas-Pipeline-...pmwj46-May2016-Complexities-of-Programme-Management-Trans-ASEAN-Gas-Pipeline-...
pmwj46-May2016-Complexities-of-Programme-Management-Trans-ASEAN-Gas-Pipeline-...
Alya Shahroom
 
Amazon Case Study - (Tyler Anton)
Amazon Case Study - (Tyler Anton)Amazon Case Study - (Tyler Anton)
Amazon Case Study - (Tyler Anton)
Tyler Anton
 
Pepsi A Case Study
Pepsi   A Case StudyPepsi   A Case Study
Pepsi A Case Study
vivek_jain
 
Huawei Technologies Ltd_Case Study Analysis (Tyler Anton)
Huawei Technologies Ltd_Case Study Analysis (Tyler Anton)Huawei Technologies Ltd_Case Study Analysis (Tyler Anton)
Huawei Technologies Ltd_Case Study Analysis (Tyler Anton)
Tyler Anton
 
A case study of amazon
A case study of amazonA case study of amazon
A case study of amazon
robinbarney
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Marketing plan umuc amba 650
Marketing plan umuc amba 650Marketing plan umuc amba 650
Marketing plan umuc amba 650
 
Mar com marketing plan trimtek (final for review)
Mar com marketing plan trimtek (final for review)Mar com marketing plan trimtek (final for review)
Mar com marketing plan trimtek (final for review)
 
pmwj46-May2016-Complexities-of-Programme-Management-Trans-ASEAN-Gas-Pipeline-...
pmwj46-May2016-Complexities-of-Programme-Management-Trans-ASEAN-Gas-Pipeline-...pmwj46-May2016-Complexities-of-Programme-Management-Trans-ASEAN-Gas-Pipeline-...
pmwj46-May2016-Complexities-of-Programme-Management-Trans-ASEAN-Gas-Pipeline-...
 
Toyota Case Study - LIVE MARKETING
Toyota Case Study - LIVE MARKETINGToyota Case Study - LIVE MARKETING
Toyota Case Study - LIVE MARKETING
 
Amazon Case Study - (Tyler Anton)
Amazon Case Study - (Tyler Anton)Amazon Case Study - (Tyler Anton)
Amazon Case Study - (Tyler Anton)
 
case-study-toyota
case-study-toyotacase-study-toyota
case-study-toyota
 
Kellogg's Facebook case study
Kellogg's Facebook case studyKellogg's Facebook case study
Kellogg's Facebook case study
 
WK 8 DA
WK 8 DAWK 8 DA
WK 8 DA
 
Pepsi A Case Study
Pepsi   A Case StudyPepsi   A Case Study
Pepsi A Case Study
 
Dell case study
Dell case studyDell case study
Dell case study
 
Is Amazon a Customer Focused Company
Is Amazon a Customer Focused CompanyIs Amazon a Customer Focused Company
Is Amazon a Customer Focused Company
 
Case study on amazon.com
Case study on amazon.comCase study on amazon.com
Case study on amazon.com
 
Huawei Technologies Ltd_Case Study Analysis (Tyler Anton)
Huawei Technologies Ltd_Case Study Analysis (Tyler Anton)Huawei Technologies Ltd_Case Study Analysis (Tyler Anton)
Huawei Technologies Ltd_Case Study Analysis (Tyler Anton)
 
A case study of amazon
A case study of amazonA case study of amazon
A case study of amazon
 
Pepsi case study and review docx
Pepsi case study and review docxPepsi case study and review docx
Pepsi case study and review docx
 
Case study on Nike
Case study on NikeCase study on Nike
Case study on Nike
 
Dell Case Study
Dell Case StudyDell Case Study
Dell Case Study
 
Türkiye'nin S.E.S. Grupları
Türkiye'nin S.E.S. GruplarıTürkiye'nin S.E.S. Grupları
Türkiye'nin S.E.S. Grupları
 
Case study On KFC
Case study On KFCCase study On KFC
Case study On KFC
 
Dell Direct Case Study
Dell Direct Case StudyDell Direct Case Study
Dell Direct Case Study
 

Ähnlich wie Grades_AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161)

BUSS 20004_BS_ CW-2 QP Spring 22.pdf
BUSS 20004_BS_ CW-2 QP Spring 22.pdfBUSS 20004_BS_ CW-2 QP Spring 22.pdf
BUSS 20004_BS_ CW-2 QP Spring 22.pdf
ShoaibAmjad13
 
MBA Instructional Methodology
MBA Instructional MethodologyMBA Instructional Methodology
MBA Instructional Methodology
Laura Sandera
 
MBA Instructional Methodology
MBA Instructional MethodologyMBA Instructional Methodology
MBA Instructional Methodology
Laura Sandera
 
MBA Instructional Methodology
MBA Instructional MethodologyMBA Instructional Methodology
MBA Instructional Methodology
Laura Sandera
 
Mba Instructional Methodology
Mba Instructional MethodologyMba Instructional Methodology
Mba Instructional Methodology
Laura Sandera
 
100 mark 60550 bradford (1)
100 mark 60550 bradford (1)100 mark 60550 bradford (1)
100 mark 60550 bradford (1)
Kartik Shekar
 
MGT 301 Principles of Management Course Descriptio.docx
MGT 301 Principles of Management  Course Descriptio.docxMGT 301 Principles of Management  Course Descriptio.docx
MGT 301 Principles of Management Course Descriptio.docx
buffydtesurina
 
MNG81001 2017 Session 3 MARKING RUBRIC ASSESSMENT 4MNG81001 M.docx
MNG81001 2017 Session 3 MARKING RUBRIC ASSESSMENT 4MNG81001 M.docxMNG81001 2017 Session 3 MARKING RUBRIC ASSESSMENT 4MNG81001 M.docx
MNG81001 2017 Session 3 MARKING RUBRIC ASSESSMENT 4MNG81001 M.docx
raju957290
 
BUS475v10Project PlanBUS475 v10Page 2 of 2Wk 4 – App.docx
BUS475v10Project PlanBUS475 v10Page 2 of 2Wk 4 – App.docxBUS475v10Project PlanBUS475 v10Page 2 of 2Wk 4 – App.docx
BUS475v10Project PlanBUS475 v10Page 2 of 2Wk 4 – App.docx
felicidaddinwoodie
 
Ashford 5 - Week 4 - Discussion 1Your initial discussion .docx
Ashford 5 - Week 4 - Discussion 1Your initial discussion .docxAshford 5 - Week 4 - Discussion 1Your initial discussion .docx
Ashford 5 - Week 4 - Discussion 1Your initial discussion .docx
wildmandelorse
 
Assessment Information Subject Code BUS606 Subjec
 Assessment Information Subject Code BUS606  Subjec Assessment Information Subject Code BUS606  Subjec
Assessment Information Subject Code BUS606 Subjec
MargaritoWhitt221
 
Final Reflection for SOM 301Due DatesDuring your lab the week .docx
Final Reflection for SOM 301Due DatesDuring your lab the week .docxFinal Reflection for SOM 301Due DatesDuring your lab the week .docx
Final Reflection for SOM 301Due DatesDuring your lab the week .docx
AKHIL969626
 
Assessment plan
Assessment planAssessment plan
Assessment plan
mskmoss
 
Aaa assessment 2Assessment description.pdfCritical Thinki.docx
Aaa assessment 2Assessment description.pdfCritical Thinki.docxAaa assessment 2Assessment description.pdfCritical Thinki.docx
Aaa assessment 2Assessment description.pdfCritical Thinki.docx
bartholomeocoombs
 

Ähnlich wie Grades_AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161) (20)

BUSS 20004_BS_ CW-2 QP Spring 22.pdf
BUSS 20004_BS_ CW-2 QP Spring 22.pdfBUSS 20004_BS_ CW-2 QP Spring 22.pdf
BUSS 20004_BS_ CW-2 QP Spring 22.pdf
 
MBA Instructional Methodology
MBA Instructional MethodologyMBA Instructional Methodology
MBA Instructional Methodology
 
MBA Instructional Methodology
MBA Instructional MethodologyMBA Instructional Methodology
MBA Instructional Methodology
 
MBA Instructional Methodology
MBA Instructional MethodologyMBA Instructional Methodology
MBA Instructional Methodology
 
Mba Instructional Methodology
Mba Instructional MethodologyMba Instructional Methodology
Mba Instructional Methodology
 
100 mark 60550 bradford (1)
100 mark 60550 bradford (1)100 mark 60550 bradford (1)
100 mark 60550 bradford (1)
 
Bsp5071 business in action handbook 2020
Bsp5071 business in action handbook 2020Bsp5071 business in action handbook 2020
Bsp5071 business in action handbook 2020
 
MGT 301 Principles of Management Course Descriptio.docx
MGT 301 Principles of Management  Course Descriptio.docxMGT 301 Principles of Management  Course Descriptio.docx
MGT 301 Principles of Management Course Descriptio.docx
 
MNG81001 2017 Session 3 MARKING RUBRIC ASSESSMENT 4MNG81001 M.docx
MNG81001 2017 Session 3 MARKING RUBRIC ASSESSMENT 4MNG81001 M.docxMNG81001 2017 Session 3 MARKING RUBRIC ASSESSMENT 4MNG81001 M.docx
MNG81001 2017 Session 3 MARKING RUBRIC ASSESSMENT 4MNG81001 M.docx
 
Materi mc
Materi mcMateri mc
Materi mc
 
BUS475v10Project PlanBUS475 v10Page 2 of 2Wk 4 – App.docx
BUS475v10Project PlanBUS475 v10Page 2 of 2Wk 4 – App.docxBUS475v10Project PlanBUS475 v10Page 2 of 2Wk 4 – App.docx
BUS475v10Project PlanBUS475 v10Page 2 of 2Wk 4 – App.docx
 
Ashford 5 - Week 4 - Discussion 1Your initial discussion .docx
Ashford 5 - Week 4 - Discussion 1Your initial discussion .docxAshford 5 - Week 4 - Discussion 1Your initial discussion .docx
Ashford 5 - Week 4 - Discussion 1Your initial discussion .docx
 
Assessment for Learning I
Assessment for Learning IAssessment for Learning I
Assessment for Learning I
 
Writing retreat app pgr
Writing retreat app pgrWriting retreat app pgr
Writing retreat app pgr
 
Assessment Information Subject Code BUS606 Subjec
 Assessment Information Subject Code BUS606  Subjec Assessment Information Subject Code BUS606  Subjec
Assessment Information Subject Code BUS606 Subjec
 
Best practices in EFL Assessment
Best practices in EFL AssessmentBest practices in EFL Assessment
Best practices in EFL Assessment
 
Final Reflection for SOM 301Due DatesDuring your lab the week .docx
Final Reflection for SOM 301Due DatesDuring your lab the week .docxFinal Reflection for SOM 301Due DatesDuring your lab the week .docx
Final Reflection for SOM 301Due DatesDuring your lab the week .docx
 
Assessment plan
Assessment planAssessment plan
Assessment plan
 
Best practices in EFL Assessment
Best practices in EFL AssessmentBest practices in EFL Assessment
Best practices in EFL Assessment
 
Aaa assessment 2Assessment description.pdfCritical Thinki.docx
Aaa assessment 2Assessment description.pdfCritical Thinki.docxAaa assessment 2Assessment description.pdfCritical Thinki.docx
Aaa assessment 2Assessment description.pdfCritical Thinki.docx
 

Grades_AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161)

  • 1. 3/17/2016 Grades ­ AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161) ­ UMUC Learning Management System https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/main.d2l?ou=129993 1/4 AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161) Course Home Content Discussions Assignments My Tools Resources Roster Help PrintGrades Grade Items Grade Item Points Weight Achieved Grade Feedback Week 1 Discussion Activity 90 / 100 4.5 / 5 90 % Individual Feedback: 90 percent Outstanding Contributor: Responses were submitted, on time, for all of the conference topics. Comments were consistently responsive to the conference assignments and significantly enhanced the quality of the classroom discussion (i.e., illustrated a point with examples, suggested new perspectives on an issues, asked questions that helped stimulate further discussion, etc.). Ideas were always expressed in a clear and coherent manner. Contributions reflect exceptional preparation. Ideas are nearly always important and provide one or more major insights as well as providing a fruitful direction for the class. Arguments are well substantiated, persuasively presented, and properly cited in text and with references. Participates very frequently throughout the conference week. Responds to more than 2 posts of other students in a substantive way. Comments or questions provided evidence that the participant had read and considered a substantial number of classmate postings before responding. Good submission of scholarly articles in your presentation. Good presentation and explanation of CRM. Week 2-3 Discussion Activity 91 / 100 9.1 / 10 91 % Individual Feedback: 91 percent Outstanding Contributor: Responses were submitted, on time, for all of the conference topics. Comments were consistently responsive to the conference assignments and significantly enhanced the quality of the classroom discussion (i.e., illustrated a point with examples, suggested new perspectives on an issues, asked questions that helped stimulate further discussion, etc.). Ideas were always expressed in a clear and coherent manner. Contributions reflect exceptional preparation. Tyler Anton     AMBA 650 9040 Marketi...  
  • 2. 3/17/2016 Grades ­ AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161) ­ UMUC Learning Management System https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/main.d2l?ou=129993 2/4 Ideas are nearly always important and provide one or more major insights as well as providing a fruitful direction for the class. Arguments are well substantiated, persuasively presented, and properly cited in text and with references. Participates very frequently throughout the conference week. Responds to more than 2 posts of other students in a substantive way. Comments or questions provided evidence that the participant had read and considered a substantial number of classmate postings before responding. Good presentation on Apple and artificial intelligence. Week 4 Case Study 90 / 100 9 / 10 90 % Individual Feedback: 90 percent Superior analysis: Identifies all or most of the key issues presented by the case. Discussion of issues reflects strong critical thinking and analytical skill. Discussion/analysis makes all or most of the recommendations called for by the case issues. Recommendations are supported by data from all or most of the relevant case facts and exhibits data. Data are creatively manipulated and applied. Discussion and recommendations are presented clearly, logically, and succinctly with no or few grammatical or other errors. Discussion/analysis reflects strong understanding of principles presented in course readings/materials. Where relevant, discussion/analysis employs proper APA style. Length limitations and other form/format requirements (if any) are followed. A SWOT analysis and references would have strengthen your submission. Good presentation of the alternative solutions of the the three issues and solution. PA WK1-5 90 / 100 7.2 / 8 90 % Individual Feedback: 90 percent An excellent PA paper based on your experience as an intern at MedImmune. Your work was timely, you interacted well with others, and you covered the topics adequately, mostly using references as appropriate. You met the basic objective of the assignment and the course. You also effectively related marketing management principles to real life situations. Week 5-6 Discussion Activity 92 / 100 9.2 / 10 92 % Individual Feedback: 92 percent Outstanding Contributor: Responses were submitted, on time, for all of the conference topics. Comments were consistently
  • 3. 3/17/2016 Grades ­ AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161) ­ UMUC Learning Management System https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/main.d2l?ou=129993 3/4 responsive to the conference assignments and significantly enhanced the quality of the classroom discussion (i.e., illustrated a point with examples, suggested new perspectives on an issues, asked questions that helped stimulate further discussion, etc.). Ideas were always expressed in a clear and coherent manner. Contributions reflect exceptional preparation. Ideas are nearly always important and provide one or more major insights as well as providing a fruitful direction for the class. Arguments are well substantiated, persuasively presented, and properly cited in text and with references. Participates very frequently throughout the conference week. Responds to more than 2 posts of other students in a substantive way. Comments or questions provided evidence that the participant had read and considered a substantial number of classmate postings before responding. Good explanation of how Alphabet did enhance brand equity. Week 7 Case Study 91 / 100 9.1 / 10 91 % Individual Feedback: 91 percent Superior analysis: Identifies all or most of the key issues presented by the case. Discussion of issues reflects strong critical thinking and analytical skill. Discussion/analysis makes all or most of the recommendations called for by the case issues. Recommendations are supported by data from all or most of the relevant case facts and exhibits data. Data are creatively manipulated and applied. Discussion and recommendations are presented clearly, logically, and succinctly with no or few grammatical or other errors. Discussion/analysis reflects strong understanding of principles presented in course readings/materials. Where relevant, discussion/analysis employs proper APA style. Length limitations and other form/format requirements (if any) are followed. Good application of Exhibit 5. Good addition of the on a side note. Week 8-9 Discussion Activity 91 / 100 9.1 / 10 91 % Individual Feedback: 91 percent Outstanding Contributor: Responses were submitted, on time, for all of the conference topics. Comments were consistently responsive to the conference assignments and significantly enhanced the quality of the classroom discussion (i.e., illustrated a point with examples, suggested new perspectives on an issues, asked questions that helped stimulate further discussion, etc.). Ideas were always expressed in a clear and coherent manner. Contributions reflect exceptional preparation. Ideas are nearly always important and provide one or more major insights as well as providing a fruitful direction for the
  • 4. 3/17/2016 Grades ­ AMBA 650 9040 Marketing Management and Innovation (2161) ­ UMUC Learning Management System https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/main.d2l?ou=129993 4/4 class. Arguments are well substantiated, persuasively presented, and properly cited in text and with references. Participates very frequently throughout the conference week. Responds to more than 2 posts of other students in a substantive way. Comments or questions provided evidence that the participant had read and considered a substantial number of classmate postings before responding. Good analysis of the comparison of Wal-Mart to Amazon. PA WK 6-9 90 / 100 6.3 / 7 90 % Individual Feedback: 90 percent An excellent PA paper based on your experience as an intern at MedImmune. Your work was timely, you interacted well with others, and you covered the topics adequately, mostly using references as appropriate. You met the basic objective of the assignment and the course. You also effectively related marketing management principles to real life situations. New Product Service Marketing Plan 91 / 100 27.3 / 30 91 % Individual Feedback: 91 percent The market plan length was 26 pages that was in excess of the syllabus stated length of 25 pages. The executive summary met the criteria of being concise, brief and represents the essential aspect of the plan. The conclusion met the accepted criteria. APA standards were also met with no spelling or grammar errors and references were also properly cited. The inclusion of tables charts and the SWOT analysis enhanced the submission. Overall an excellent paper.