Risk taking in Academic Libraries: The Implications of Prospect Theory
1. Tony Horava, AUL (Collections)
University of Ottawa
OLA SuperConference
Jan. 28, 2015
2. Organizational risk
Prospect Theory - Major principles
Implications for risk assessment
Implications for academic libraries
Conclusion
http://cache2.asset-
cache.net/gp/108113005.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=3&d=awa
M4LoT7hBkpnWMaZOi86ZN5uTph2KW34WXjDY%2fRL2UfTKpg
7wZzBTEKgLqfqxS
https://encrypted-
tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQy--
5w9ScJN3T7GUeALRugf6pBpyBJE9MmTQa6EpB0EZz
1qYh4
3. “Society values risk taking but not gambling,
and what is meant by gambling is risk taking that
turns out badly. From the point of view of managers and a
society dedicated to good management, the problem is to
develop and maintain managerial reputations for taking "good"
(i.e., ultimately successful) risks and avoiding "bad" (i.e.,
ultimately unsuccessful) risks, in the face of (possibly inherent)
uncertainties about which are which.”
James G. March and Zur Shapira, “Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk
Taking,” Management Science 33, no. 11 (1987): 1413.
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://askgeorgie.com/wp-
content/uploads/2012/09/11405182-road-ahead-unclear-green-freeway-
sign-representing-uncertainty-in-financial-
business.jpg&imgrefurl=http://askgeorgie.com/re-wire-your-brain-for-
weight-loss-part-iii/&h=1110&w=1200&tbnid=AnU-
SeGF8hUurM:&zoom=1&docid=uOuBErgg4U9hlM&ei=37_GVMrXD4uiyQS-
sIGoBQ&tbm=isch&ved=0CDgQMygFMAU
4. The ARL 2030 Scenarios :
A sustained reflection upon the risks and opportunities for
academic libraries, based on four possible scenarios.
A call for academic libraries to assess the probability of any
scenario occurring and consider the impacts
“Organizations act on what they know or what they believe
they know to be certain. Many of those certainties are in
actuality uncertainties. Those false certainties become the
basis for an organization’s strategic decision-making. “
5. Frames - lenses that filter some things and allow others to
pass through, help us order experience.
Each frame comes with concepts and metaphors for
organizing our understanding of the world, esp organizational
culture
Four frames – Structural; Human resource; Political; Symbolic
Looking at organizations this way can help us assess what is
working and what isn’t – and addressing risk in reframing
6.
7. Technological -
rapid obsolescence and the hype cycle;
inadequate or dysfunctional tools;
lack of interoperability with other systems;
foreshortened life cycles for development;
the quality of maintenance and support
Financial -
the institution’s degree of support of the library;
the foreign exchange rate;
Ontario’s and Canada’s economic performance;
investments made by the institution;
the global economy & inflation
http://wilderdom.com/images/Ris
kNotTakingRisksCartoon.jpg
8. Political -
institutional strategic agendas shifting in direction;
changes in senior administration and therefore shifting loyalties and power
balances;
a range of stakeholders in the academy with different/complementary interests;
Assessment standards and measurement of impacts;
unpredictable directions/pressures for post-secondary education;
new governments with new agendas
Socio-cultural –
new patron attitudes and preferences in their use of information and devices;
new learning styles based on use of social media and other technologies;
new purposes for using library spaces and collections, such as collaborative work
shifting demographics that can lead to a new mix of the student population;
9. Mental paradigms affect risk assessment and decision-making in
libraries. The historian of science Thomas Kuhn asserted that a
paradigm is "the entire constellation of beliefs, values, techniques, and
so on shared by the members of a given community.”
- In a library context, this constellation is typically conservative,
reactive, and risk-averse (but changing…)
The importance of process: "The less things are predictable the more
attention you have to pay to the strategy process. Uncertainty has the
effect of moving the key to success from "the optimal strategy" to the
"most skilful strategy process.” Kees van der Heijden, Scenarios: The
Art of Strategic Conversation vii-viii.
10. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”
Econometrica 1979 47(2): 263-291.
http://www.princeton.edu/~kahneman/docs/Publications/pro
spect_theory.pdf
The authors Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, awarded
the Nobel Prize for Economics in 2002
Originally applied to behavioral economics; then applied to
other contexts
Has led to a more nuanced understanding of how we grapple
with uncertainty and make decisions in the face of risk.
11. 1 - Probability weighting;
2 - Reference dependence;
3 - Loss aversion;
4 - Diminishing sensitivity
12. The role of probability weighting in decision-making is quite
crucial.
Typically, “the weighting function overweights low
probabilities and underweights high probabilities.” Generally
speaking, people are overconfident about expected outcomes
related to risk, and make decisions with particular biases
Interview with Daniel Kahneman:
◦ “People systematically violate the predictions of expected utility
theory.”
◦ “The emotional tail wags the rational dog”
13. People derive utility from gains and losses, measured relative
to some reference point, rather than from any absolute
standard for economic well-being.
All gains and losses are therefore relative; no one size fits all
Think of your Collections budget, or Operations budget, or
staff complement, as the reference point for your library’s
experience in any given year – versus previous years.
14. Loss aversion - people are much more sensitive to losses—
even small losses—than to gains of the same magnitude, eg
“people tend to be risk averse over moderate probability
gains: they typically prefer a certain gain of $500 to a 50
percent chance of winning $1,000.”
People hate losing much more than they love winning (by a
factor of about 3 to 1, based on Kahneman and Tversky’s
research)
15. Replacing a $100 gain (or loss) with a $200 gain (or loss) has
a significant utility impact, replacing a $1,000 gain (or loss)
with a $1,100 gain (or loss) has a smaller impact.
As numbers scale upward – think of budgets or collections-
this implies that we become less sensitive to the impact that
variations from expectations can produce
A serial that costs $100 this year and jumps to $500 next
year is seen as a dramatic increase, versus a serial that costs
$5,000 this year and $5,400 next year. Scale of perception is
different.
-
16. Kahneman and Tversky asked subjects to choose between the
following two options:
A) a 5% chance to win a three-week trip to England, France and Italy;
or
B) a 10% chance to win a one week trip to England.
67% of participants chose Option A, and 33% chose B, even though
the odds are in favour of B.
17. In a second test, subjects were asked to choose between the
following two options:
A) a 20% chance to win a gamble for $4,000; or
B) a 25% chance to win a gamble for $3,000
Result: 65% of participants chose Option A, and only 35%
chose B, even though the odds are in favour of B.
18. Collection strategies, eg the possible end of the Big Deal
Funding challenges/existential threats
Consortial initiatives
The galloping horse of technology
Transformation of services
Contingencies such as natural disasters
Staffing shortfalls
Etc....
19. These principles can be useful in our mental toolkit for
decision-making in a climate of difficult
choices/opportunities
Prospect Theory can make us more aware of our default ways
of understanding risk
Imperfect knowledge : dealing with risk
Speaks to the importance of evidence-based approaches,
both for short and long term planning & decision-making
20. There’s too much evidence
There’s not enough good evidence
The evidence doesn’t quite apply
People are trying to mislead you
You are trying to mislead you
The side-effects outweigh the cure
Stories are more persuasive anyways
Pfeffer and Sutton, Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-truths, and Total Nonsense:
Profiting from Evidence-based Management, Harvard Business School Press,
Boston, MA.2006.
21. Risk is baked in to the academic world, and increasing in intensity
with each year
The more aware we are of risk dynamics, the better equipped we are
with dealing with tough constraints and choices.
Important to review the full spectrum of risk factors to better
understand the landscape
Developing an evidence-based organizational culture is crucial
Prospect Theory can provide us with some insights on human
decision-making under risk. Can this transfer to our world and be
useful?
22. “Risk-taking in Academic Libraries: The Implications of Prospect
Theory” Library Leadership & Management 28(2) 2014
https://journals.tdl.org/llm/index.php/llm/article/view/7055
A year and a half ago, serendipity led me to come upon an article called Prospect Theory…..and I started thinking about how it could connect with the world of libraries, and acad lbr in specific
I’m very happy to be here today to share my thoughts, and I look forward to hearing your comments/reactions….
The world we live in – about decision-making, risk assessment, environmental scanning, judging outcomes, consequences. Uncertainty is the norm.
The ability to exercise control over the outcomes of decisions and to effectively navigate uncertainties are hallmarks of successful risk-taking
“The more mature the business, the more embedded those false certainties become and the more significant the perceived risk associated with change or acting against those certainties.”
Provokes the question – how much do we really know, and since we can never have complete knowledge of any situation, how much knowledge or evidence is enough, to make an informed decision?
and to weigh the challenges in planning approaches and strategies for such a major scale of change.
Says a lot about risk assessment and decision-making, and making organizations more functional/healthier places to be….
Multi-stakeholder environment; competing interests and timeframes and priorities
to look back upon previous cycles of strategic planning and ask ourselves some key questions, i.e. did we accomplish our goals?
the need to interpret facts, especially current facts, in light of our present landscape, and the unpredictability of change
Moral hazard typically applied to the world of politics, where decision-makers have very short timeframes, ie until the next election. 2-3 years? No long term assessment of consequences.
‘Moral hazard’ : Economist Paul Krugman described moral hazard as "any situation in which one person makes the decision about how much risk to take, while someone else bears the cost if things go badly.“ (typically applied to the world of politics – no surprise!)
Highly influential ; cited hundreds of times
Countered the prevalence of expected utility theory
The key premise was that the utility of any outcome was based upon
the “weighted average of all possible levels of utility [to] best represent the utility at any
given point in time.” 1
In other words, given a set of scenarios for a specific issue, the
weighting of the possible options and the averaging of these weights would determine the
optimal utility at any particular time.
Kahneman: Israeli-American psychologist notable for his work on the psychology of judgment and decision-making, as well as behavioral economics, he is professor emeritus of psychology and public affairs at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School. The Economist lists him as the 15th most influential economist in the world.
Amos Tversky: was a cognitive and mathematical psychologist, a student of cognitive science, co-author of a three-volume treatise, Foundations of Measurement
taught at the Hebrew University, Israel before moving to Stanford University
ttttt
‘Normative model of rational choice’ for describing economic behaviour
People are not very good at predicting the probabilities of different occurrences/scenarios
Asymmetry of human choices
Expected utility theory – focused on absolute gains, not related to a given reference point or situation
Institutional comparators are important, but challenging.
All decisions under risk relate to reference dependence – where one starts.
Diminishing sensitivity: “there is an observed loss of sensitivity to gains or losses, as the scale of such actions or events increases.”
In both cases, the dollar amount is $400, but the scale of perception and sensitivity are very different, since the increases are 500% and 8% respectively
The respondents were asked to imagine that they were actually faced with the choice described in the problem and to indicate the decision that they would have made in this case.
The responses were anonymous, and the instructions specified that there was no ‘correct’ answer to such problems and that the aim of the study was to find out how people choose among risky prospects.
The problems were presented in questionnaire form, with at most a dozen questions per booklet. Several forms of each questionnaire were constructed so that subjects were exposed to the problems in different orders.
In addition, two versions of each problem were used in the left-right position of the prospects were reversed.
. Both of these examples demonstrate how our choices violate utility
theory, since we are acting on impulses or motives that run counter to our best
interest or prospect; balance of probabilities being ignored.
Can collective action or collaboration mitigate against these assumptions ?
Can help with strategic planning, and with day-to-day decisions/issues….
, ie in a climate where increasingly difficult choices will need to be made (coming to terms with losses or tradeoffs)
We found that the two most critical determinants for successful assessment were library leadership that promoted, supported and used assessment, and an
organizational culture that was customer-centered and motivated to improve library services.
“When the evidence is not enough” Steve Hiller, Martha Kyrillidou, Jim Self. report on the findings of the two-year Association of
Research Libraries (ARL) sponsored project, “Making Library Assessment Work: Practical Approaches to Effective and Sustainable Assessment,”;