14. Summary Graph
This figure shows a summary
of estimated peak rates of
climate change and sizes of
changes associated with
various classes of cause. Ice
ages and tectonic movement
would be considered slow, and
volcanic eruptions and changes
in solar heating would be
relatively fast. Please note that
the axes are logarithmic. Also,
the plotted line is drawn to
assist in seeing the relationship
between speed, size, and
duration of climate change. In
this figure, human-caused
climate change falls within
natural variability. Projections
of human influence, however,
may place the human-caused
climate change outside what
is considered natural.
http://climate-expeditions.org/public/human-impacts-
on-climate-change.html
16. âWhat do we know today
about how global temperature
changes?
âThe temperature of the air near the surface has been
measured by land, sea and satellite instruments, very
accurately since the 1970s and fairly accurately since the
late 19th century (black curve in GRAPH A, below). Four
main influences are known, and combining these gives
quite a good match to the observations (orange curve in
A). The known influences are: irregular âEl Niñoâ
fluctuations in the upwelling of deep cold waters in the
tropical Pacific Ocean, which cool or warm the air for a
few years (purple curve in B); sulfate smog particles
emitted in volcanic eruptions, such as El ChichĂłn in 1982
and Pinatubo in 1991, which bring temporary cooling
(blue curve); a quasi-regular cycle in the Sunâs activity
that changes the radiation received at Earth (green
curve); and human ("anthropogenic") changes â
primarily emission of carbon dioxide from fossil fuels, but
also other greenhouse gases and pollution such as
smoke, and land-use changes such as deforestation (red
curve). Theorists can calculate the actual influence of
each factor, but only approximately. The authors of the
model shown in the graph adjusted the weights to give
the best fit to the observations. In particular, the global
heating since the 1970s can be explained only by
humanityâs greenhouse gas emissions. Note, for example,
how the temperature trend in the first decade of the 21st
century was generally flat because an upward push by
anthropogenic forces was temporarily offset by a
downward pull as solar activity decreased and the
oceans absorbed more heat than usual from the
atmosphere (sea water temperatures in fact continued to
rise).â
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/summary.htm
27. âPort Jefferson, NYâ US National Weather Service
http://www.weather.gov/images/okx/Sandy/ManhattanLexingtonAve_WzohaibFl
ickrNHCReport.jpg
28. The Precautionary Principle
ââŠthe âprecautionary principleâ is a notion which supports taking
protective action before there is complete scientific proof of a risk;
that is, action should not be delayed simply because full scientific
information is lacking. The âprecautionary principleâ or
precautionary approach has been incorporated into several
international environmental agreements, and some claim that it is
now recognized as a general principle of international
environmental law.â
29. BUTâŠ
what happens when two precautionary
principles seem to collideâŠ.?
An âEconomicâ Principle (Jobs!)
and
An âEnvironmentalâ Principle (Health!)
31. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC)
âThe Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is the
international body for assessing the science related to climate
change. The IPCC was set up in 1988 by the World Meteorological
Organization (WMO) and United Nations Environment Programme
(UNEP) to provide policymakers with regular assessments of the
scientific basis of climate change, its impacts and future risks, and
options for adaptation and mitigation. IPCC assessments provide
a scientific basis for governments at all levels to develop climate-
related policies, and they underlie negotiations at the UN Climate
Conference â the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC). The assessments are policy-relevant
but not policy-prescriptive: they may present projections of
future climate change based on different scenarios and the risks
that climate change poses and discuss the implications of
response options, but they do not tell policymakers what actions
to take.â
http://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/docs/factsheets/FS_what_ipcc.pdf
39. The Evolution of Scientific
Understanding of Climate Change
âą For over two centuries scientists have
considered and studied why and how climate
change occurs
âą Accumulations of data â driven by advances in
methodology and in available technology â
now provide strong support for currently
accepted theories
âą But public skepticism continuesâŠ
40.
41. Climate Change and Human Health
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGIIAR5-Chap11_FINAL.pdf
42. âFigure 11-1 | Conceptual diagram showing three primary exposure pathways by which climate change affects health: directly through
weather variables such as heat and storms; indirectly through natural systems such as disease vectors; and pathways heavily mediated
through human systems such as undernutrition. The green box indicates the moderating influences of local environmental conditions on
how climate change exposure pathways are manifest in a particular population. The gray box indicates that the extent to which the three
categories of exposure translate to actual health burden is moderated by such factors as background public health and socioeconomic
conditions, and adaptation measures. The green arrows at the bottom indicate that there may be feedback mechanisms, positive or
negative, between societal infrastructure, public health, and adaptation measures and climate change itself⊠â
(courtesy of E. Garcia, UC Berkeley).
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGIIAR5-Chap11_FINAL.pdf
43. Who is most affected???
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGIIAR5-Chap11_FINAL.pdf
54. â[US-China] Climate Accord Relies on Environmental
Policies Now in Placeâ
âThe United States and China should both be able to
meet the stated goals by aggressively pursuing
policies that are largely in place, these analysts said.
For the United States, those include the Obama
administrationâs proposal to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions from coal plants, which would go into
effect in 2017. Experts said that in practice it should
be possible to wring more emissions cuts from that
and other climate-related measures without adding
to costs.â -- HENRY FOUNTAIN and JOHN SCHWARTZ
Nov. 12, 2014 New York Times
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/11/13/world/climate-pact-by-us-and-china-
relies-on-policies-now-largely-in-place.html?referrer&_r=0
55. NYT Video | âWhat the Climate Accord Could Change The
possible effects for the coal and automobile industries of the
landmark agreement between the United States and China.â
http://www.nytimes.com/video/world/asia/100000003230992/what-the-climate-accord-could-
change.html?playlistId=1194811622182®ion=video-grid&version=video-grid-
thumbnail&contentCollection=Times+Video&contentPlacement=3&module=recent-