SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 9
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
MID YEAR 2010 RESIDENTIAL  
                MARKET ESTIMATES AND APPARENT TRENDS  
                 FOR THE GREATER METROPOLITAN DENVER  
                      METROLIST & IRES DATA CENTERS 
                                          
    1. FORECLOSURES 
         a. There is no question we peaked in foreclosure filings in 2008 and 
            we now have had almost three years of decline. 
         b. It should be noted right here; Short Sales are have become the 
            new method by which lenders have been reconciling unpaid debt 
            with borrowers in large numbers for more than 12 to 18 months. 
         c. Therefore, we may be past the foreclosure cycle, but the short sale 
            cycle pedals on hard and fast.  
         d. We will have 2‐5 more years in this cycle before a more normal 
            trend is reached not unlike the cycle in the 1980s. 
         e. It takes as long to recover as it does to get sick! 
 

      35000
                         Arapahoe County
      30000              Jefferson County

                         Denver County
      25000
                         Douglas County
      20000              Boulder County

                         Adams County
      15000
                         Broomfield County
      10000              Total Metro Area

       5000


         0
              1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010


                                                                                       
 
2. SALES TO LISTING RATIOS 
                  a. The ratio of sales to listings has been of paramount importance to 
                     predicting the health of a market for many years. 
                  b. What we are seeing right now is an estimated trend of rapidly 
                     increasing supply and the absorption from sales activity 
                     remaining constant. 
                  c. This is creating a trend or movement toward over supply.  
                  d. If the second half of 2010 were to continue on this same trend line 
                     as the first six months, we will drift into an oversupply market 
                     creating more foreclosure and short sale potential. 
                                                                    Ratio of Listings to Sales
            4.00
            3.00
    Ratio




            2.00
            1.00
            0.00
                   1975   1977   1979   1981   1983   1985   1987     1989   1991    1993   1995   1997   1999   2001   2003   2005   2007   2009
                                                                              Date                                                                   
 
             3. AVERAGE PRICE TRENDS 
                  a. Average price trends should only be considered as a guide to 
                     market conditions and not an absolute for all properties in a given 
                     market place. 
                  b. In the first half of 2010, we have seen average prices inch up. 
                  c. They have increased significantly in areas that have higher end 
                     inventory, because we have seen increased activity there due to 
                     the new price paradigm which is often 20, 30, 40 and even 50% of 
                     2007 values. 
                  d. This elevates the average price particularly if there is less activity 
                     at the lower end of the market as we have seen since the Tax 
                     Credits were eliminated from this equation. 
                  e. Overall, average prices are up, but in many individual MLS areas, 
                     prices have actually declined. 
                  f. Remember, each and every enclave, community or neighborhood 
                     needs to be addressed for their own individual price trend.  
                     Average prices can only be used as a guide, and then and only 
then can they assist with computing the health of a residential 
                  market area. 
                 History of Average Residential Prices in Denver Metro Area

            $700,000
            $600,000                           ALL AREAS
            $500,000                           DSE
            $400,000                           SSE
    Price




            $300,000                           DEC/DHR/DHL
            $200,000
            $100,000
                  $0
                       1974
                              1976
                                     1978
                                            1980
                                                   1982
                                                          1984
                                                                 1986
                                                                        1988
                                                                               1990
                                                                                       1992
                                                                                              1994
                                                                                                     1996
                                                                                                            1998
                                                                                                                   2000
                                                                                                                          2002
                                                                                                                                 2004
                                                                                                                                        2006
                                                                                                                                               2008
                                                                                                                                                      2010
                                                                                      Date
                                                                                                                                                              
 
    4. MARKET SHARE BY PRICE RANGE & SUPPLY OF INVENTORY 
         a. There is much to learn from this next chart.  It can tell us the story 
            about the health of the market. 
         b. Is the market growing in the higher priced market segment or is it 
            growing at the bottom of the price ladder? 
         c. Here’s what we know.  In the last 6 months, there has been 
            considerable growth in the middle of the market from $200K to 
            $750K.   
         d. This makes sense since we literally ran out of inventory under 
            $200K due to the tax credits, the $200‐400K price segment grew 
            by almost 2% in just 6 months. 
         e. We know from NAR data that each entry level transaction creates 
            an upward movement of parties to the market place hopefully 
            displacing residents along the way until there have been 6 more 
            transactions.  (Keep in mind, many of the bank owned properties 
            were vacant at the time of sale a less “friction” in the market place 
            resulted.) 
         f. We know the higher the price the greater the months’ supply of 
            inventory.  This has historically been a result of greater builder 
            margins therefore more supply was created at this end of the 
            market, but with virtually no new construction in the market at 
this time, this suggests significant weakness for price 
                 improvement in this segment moving forward. 

                         MONTHS SUPPLY
    40
    35
    30
    25
    20
    15
    10                                               MONTHS SUPPLY
     5
     0




                                                                      
 
              g. Additionally, we know, the higher the price the smaller the market 
                 share in terms of the number of transactions.  This trend has 
                 never changed as long as this chart has been compiled. 

                          % MKT SHARE
    120.00%
    100.00%
     80.00%
     60.00%
     40.00%
                                                       % MKT SHARE
     20.00%
      0.00%




                                                                      
 
     5. IN CLOSING 
           a. There are always competing ways to read the data and present 
              the data in any report. 
b. The data in this analysis has been presented in this fashion since 
             1975.   
          c. The result has been a relatively accurate method of predicting 
             future trends in this market place. 
          d. Everything points toward more of the same. 
                  i. Uncertainty 
                 ii. Price sensitivity 
                iii. Inventory teetering on the tipping point of dangerous 
                     oversupply 
                iv. External factors affecting consumer sentiment which affects 
                     home buying confidence 
                 v. The cost of borrowing 
                vi. The cost of energy 
               vii. Residential taxes 
          e. As a result, we can’t bet on price appreciation to “bail out” the 
             price depressed residential market any time soon. 
          f. It’s going to take some time to heal all these wounds. 
              
All data obtained, compiled and edited from Metrolist, Inc. which compiles their data from 
individual Realtor sources.  This report was completed by Tom Cryer, SCRP Broker Associate 
with The Kentwood Company.  Information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but 
not guaranteed. 
 
FORECLOSURES BY COUNTY AND METRO DENVER AREA TOTAL MID YEAR 2010 (ESTIMATED)




35000
                          Arapahoe County

30000
                          Jefferson County

                          Denver County
25000
                          Douglas County

20000
                          Boulder County

                          Adams County
15000
                          Broomfield County

10000
                          Total Metro Area


5000



   0
        1971    1974   1977   1980    1983    1986   1989   1992   1995   1998   2001   2004   2007   2010
Total # of Listings and Sales at Mid Year 2010 Denver MLS System
          YEAR                LISTINGS               SALES                 RATIO
                              Total Count          Total Count
         12/31/75                   35,728                19,156             1.87          Potential negative market signal (Above 2.50)
         12/31/76                   40,223                24,354             1.65          Potential positive market signal (Below 2.00)
         12/31/77                   41,598                29,875             1.39          Potential neutral market signal (Between 2.00 & 2.50)
         12/31/78                   49,675                31,213             1.59          Too soon to tell // Year to date // Inconclusive
         12/31/79                   59,384                31,024             1.91          Indicates all time high or low
         12/31/80                   55,438                23,952             2.31
         12/31/81                   49,755                22,125             2.25
         12/31/82                   52,817                18,756             2.82
         12/31/83                   63,585                23,566             2.70
         12/31/84                   69,041                23,264             2.97
         12/31/85                   73,279                24,489             2.99
         12/31/86                   75,694                25,865             2.93
         12/31/87                   69,740                23,414             2.98
         12/31/88                   62,521                24,120             2.59
         12/31/89                   50,112                25,142             1.99
         12/31/90                   53,682                26,436             2.03
         12/31/91                   53,286                27,375             1.95
         12/31/92                   48,103                34,828             1.38
         12/31/93                   69,118                40,291             1.72
         12/31/94                   73,637                40,068             1.84
         12/31/95                   78,969                37,767             2.09
         12/31/96                   84,909                39,849             2.13
         12/31/97                   90,813                41,959             2.16
         12/31/98                  103,402                47,836             2.16
         12/31/99                   72,842                48,795             1.49
         12/31/00                  100,672                50,499             1.99
         12/31/01                  133,688                49,372             2.71
         12/27/02                  138,445                49,326             2.81
         12/29/03                  123,596                47,731             2.59
         12/31/04                  127,989                53,710             2.38
         12/31/05                  135,008                54,072             2.50
         12/31/06                  152,807                52,220             2.93
         12/31/07                  143,400                51,304             2.80
         12/31/08                  123,655                48,926             2.53
         12/31/09                  104,330                48,926             2.13
         12/31/10                  125,954                42,892             2.94          MID YEAR


 7/1/2008 (EST)                LISTINGS              SALES                 RATIO
       Res                          92,894              33,012              2.81
      Cond                          26,772               8,968              2.99
      Land                           4,134                 452              9.15
       Inc                           2,154                 460              4.68
      Totals                       125,954              42,892              2.94

                                                                  Ratio of Listings to Sales
        4.00
        3.00
Ratio




        2.00
        1.00
        0.00
               1975   1977   1979   1981    1983    1985   1987     1989    1991    1993   1995   1997   1999   2001   2003   2005   2007   2009
                                                                             Date


               Information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. All data obtained from year to date statistics provided by
                                 Metrolist, Inc. and compiled by Tom Cryer, SCRP Broker Associate with The Kentwood Company
MID YEAR 2010 AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL PRICES IN THE
                   DENVER METROLIST SYSTEM
                 YEAR                    ALL AREAS                               DSE                         SSE      DEC/DHR/DHL
                 1974                        $34,722                              $36,668                     $50,912       $36,291
                 1975                        $35,921                              $36,381                     $52,938       $59,250
                 1976                        $39,740                              $43,195                     $61,135       $60,925
                 1977                        $44,876                              $50,825                     $67,072       $64,473
                 1978                        $55,610                              $64,650                     $83,446       $77,178
                 1979                        $66,051                              $77,648                     $96,058       $80,129
                 1980                        $78,594                              $97,128                    $127,856       $94,337
                 1981                        $83,893                              $98,263                    $149,426      $101,684
                 1982                        $87,816                             $105,454                    $161,047      $108,409
                 1983                        $90,346                             $109,035                    $169,407      $113,755
                 1984                        $95,137                             $112,423                    $167,934      $132,430
                 1985                        $95,447                             $112,415                    $160,672      $119,942
                 1986                        $97,049                             $113,650                    $170,716      $137,264
                 1987                       $102,773                             $116,006                    $171,634      $137,204
                 1988                        $98,937                             $114,095                    $171,848      $127,303
                 1989                       $103,868                             $117,491                    $173,571      $133,061
                 1990                       $102,848                             $120,200                    $194,900      $151,544
                 1991                       $109,071                             $120,485                    $207,658      $146,456
                 1992                       $115,154                             $127,078                    $212,173      $154,699
                 1993                       $126,168                             $140,513                    $251,099      $164,913
                 1994                       $138,301                             $156,144                    $278,046      $184,909
                 1995                       $150,736                             $172,185                    $292,631      $192,643
                 1996                       $159,328                             $185,406                    $315,670      $193,398
                 1997                       $169,587                             $201,601                    $315,143      $205,132
                 1998                       $185,785                             $226,862                    $358,542      $211,589
                 1999                       $208,296                             $259,311                    $433,756      $231,368
                 2000                       $257,394                             $325,126                    $492,378      $305,952
                 2001                       $239,779                             $301,211                    $506,959      $277,089
                 2002                       $268 926
                                            $268,926                             $348 850
                                                                                 $348,850                    $507 371
                                                                                                             $507,371      $315 375
                                                                                                                           $315,375
                 2003                       $279,279                             $365,652                    $497,179      $315,402
                 2004                       $290,876                             $387,094                    $527,605      $342,193
                 2005                       $309,047                             $426,258                    $602,644      $355,242
                 2006                       $317,112                             $468,266                    $589,911      $361,927
                 2007                       $310,418                             $486,515                    $595,345      $372,880
                 2008                       $270,261                             $461,630                    $529,667      $362,328
                 2009                       $241,876                             $435,726                    $490,787      $358,684
                 2010                       $252,041                             $425,402                    $485,992      $359,179 Mid Year



            History of Average Residential Prices in Denver Metro Area

        $700,000
        $600,000                                    ALL AREAS
        $500,000                                    DSE
        $400,000                                    SSE
Price




        $300,000                                    DEC/DHR/DHL
        $200,000
        $100,000
              $0
                      1974

                               1976

                                       1978

                                                1980

                                                         1982

                                                                 1984

                                                                          1986

                                                                                   1988

                                                                                            1990

                                                                                                    1992

                                                                                                             1994

                                                                                                                      1996

                                                                                                                              1998

                                                                                                                                       2000

                                                                                                                                                2002

                                                                                                                                                       2004

                                                                                                                                                              2006

                                                                                                                                                                     2008

                                                                                                                                                                            2010




                                                                                                   Date
             Information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. All data obtained from Metrolist, Inc. and compiled by
                                            Tom Cryer, SCRP Broker Associate with The Kentwood Company.
DENVER METRO SINGLE FAMILY MARKET SHARE BY PRICE RANGE AS OF MID YEAR 2010**
**Annualized

   LISTING RANGES   ACTIVE LISTINGS    UNDER CONTRACT        SALES     % MKT SHARE

ALL PRICES                    24,731                 5,288    41,174        100.00%
$0‐200K                        6,175                 2,327    16,227         39.41%
$200‐400K                     10,670                 2,091    18,679         45.37%
$400‐750K                      5,249                   741     5,440         13.21%
$750K‐1M                       1306                    105       689          1.67%
$1M +                          1,639                    89       533          1.29%
                                                                            100.96%
           SUPPLY IN MONTHS OF SFR INVENTORY
LISTING RANGES     TOTAL # SALES     MONTHS SUPPLY

ALL PRICES                    41,174                  7.21
$0‐200K                       16227                   4.57
$200‐400K                     18679                   6.85
$400‐750K                      5440                  11.58
$750K‐1M                         689                 22.75
$1M +                            533                 36.90

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Expected us gdp growth rate presentation
Expected us gdp growth rate presentationExpected us gdp growth rate presentation
Expected us gdp growth rate presentationVictoria Rock
 
Leslie Appleton Young 2012 Forecast
Leslie Appleton Young 2012 ForecastLeslie Appleton Young 2012 Forecast
Leslie Appleton Young 2012 Forecastrllifestyles
 
2012 Real Estate Market Update
2012 Real Estate Market Update2012 Real Estate Market Update
2012 Real Estate Market UpdateSDM: Music Venture
 
Rural Road Safety
Rural Road SafetyRural Road Safety
Rural Road SafetyRPO America
 
Understanding The Recession
Understanding The RecessionUnderstanding The Recession
Understanding The RecessionnfpSynergy
 
BRAR-The Economy and Housing Market - Nov 3
BRAR-The Economy and Housing Market - Nov 3BRAR-The Economy and Housing Market - Nov 3
BRAR-The Economy and Housing Market - Nov 3kfisher181
 
State of Regional Development in Thailand
State  of Regional Development in ThailandState  of Regional Development in Thailand
State of Regional Development in ThailandDr.Choen Krainara
 
Venturefest Bristol 2011 Professor Nigel jump, University of Bath
Venturefest Bristol 2011 Professor Nigel jump, University of BathVenturefest Bristol 2011 Professor Nigel jump, University of Bath
Venturefest Bristol 2011 Professor Nigel jump, University of BathScience City Bristol
 
03 05-13 ucan @ piedmont economics club
03 05-13 ucan @ piedmont economics club03 05-13 ucan @ piedmont economics club
03 05-13 ucan @ piedmont economics clubMatt Dunbar
 
The CEO’s Dilemma - How to drive efficient innovation in the organization
The CEO’s Dilemma - How to drive efficient innovation in the organizationThe CEO’s Dilemma - How to drive efficient innovation in the organization
The CEO’s Dilemma - How to drive efficient innovation in the organizationJoeBarkai
 
Crop Presentation (10.12.07)
Crop Presentation (10.12.07)Crop Presentation (10.12.07)
Crop Presentation (10.12.07)apulvermache
 
2013 California Housing Market Update and San Diego Area
2013 California Housing Market Update and San Diego Area2013 California Housing Market Update and San Diego Area
2013 California Housing Market Update and San Diego AreaRealEstateEducation
 
3.4 other considerations before trading internationally
3.4 other considerations before trading internationally3.4 other considerations before trading internationally
3.4 other considerations before trading internationallyRawVix
 
Sequoia Market Take
Sequoia Market TakeSequoia Market Take
Sequoia Market TakeConorMcKenna
 
Sequoia Capital downturn presentation
Sequoia Capital downturn presentationSequoia Capital downturn presentation
Sequoia Capital downturn presentationguest14c91
 

Was ist angesagt? (18)

Expected us gdp growth rate presentation
Expected us gdp growth rate presentationExpected us gdp growth rate presentation
Expected us gdp growth rate presentation
 
Leslie Appleton Young 2012 Forecast
Leslie Appleton Young 2012 ForecastLeslie Appleton Young 2012 Forecast
Leslie Appleton Young 2012 Forecast
 
2012 Real Estate Market Update
2012 Real Estate Market Update2012 Real Estate Market Update
2012 Real Estate Market Update
 
Rural Road Safety
Rural Road SafetyRural Road Safety
Rural Road Safety
 
CAR_EconomicForcast_April_20_2012
CAR_EconomicForcast_April_20_2012CAR_EconomicForcast_April_20_2012
CAR_EconomicForcast_April_20_2012
 
Understanding The Recession
Understanding The RecessionUnderstanding The Recession
Understanding The Recession
 
BRAR-The Economy and Housing Market - Nov 3
BRAR-The Economy and Housing Market - Nov 3BRAR-The Economy and Housing Market - Nov 3
BRAR-The Economy and Housing Market - Nov 3
 
State of Regional Development in Thailand
State  of Regional Development in ThailandState  of Regional Development in Thailand
State of Regional Development in Thailand
 
Venturefest Bristol 2011 Professor Nigel jump, University of Bath
Venturefest Bristol 2011 Professor Nigel jump, University of BathVenturefest Bristol 2011 Professor Nigel jump, University of Bath
Venturefest Bristol 2011 Professor Nigel jump, University of Bath
 
03 05-13 ucan @ piedmont economics club
03 05-13 ucan @ piedmont economics club03 05-13 ucan @ piedmont economics club
03 05-13 ucan @ piedmont economics club
 
The CEO’s Dilemma - How to drive efficient innovation in the organization
The CEO’s Dilemma - How to drive efficient innovation in the organizationThe CEO’s Dilemma - How to drive efficient innovation in the organization
The CEO’s Dilemma - How to drive efficient innovation in the organization
 
41518607
4151860741518607
41518607
 
Crop Presentation (10.12.07)
Crop Presentation (10.12.07)Crop Presentation (10.12.07)
Crop Presentation (10.12.07)
 
Seminar 13 Mar 2013 - Session 4 - Smallholders oil palm production in Indones...
Seminar 13 Mar 2013 - Session 4 - Smallholders oil palm production in Indones...Seminar 13 Mar 2013 - Session 4 - Smallholders oil palm production in Indones...
Seminar 13 Mar 2013 - Session 4 - Smallholders oil palm production in Indones...
 
2013 California Housing Market Update and San Diego Area
2013 California Housing Market Update and San Diego Area2013 California Housing Market Update and San Diego Area
2013 California Housing Market Update and San Diego Area
 
3.4 other considerations before trading internationally
3.4 other considerations before trading internationally3.4 other considerations before trading internationally
3.4 other considerations before trading internationally
 
Sequoia Market Take
Sequoia Market TakeSequoia Market Take
Sequoia Market Take
 
Sequoia Capital downturn presentation
Sequoia Capital downturn presentationSequoia Capital downturn presentation
Sequoia Capital downturn presentation
 

Ähnlich wie MyTownCryer Mid Year 2010 Analysis

Intellectual property Strategy
Intellectual property StrategyIntellectual property Strategy
Intellectual property StrategyMurray Hunter
 
Cereal Markets in Ethiopia: Policies and Performances
Cereal Markets in Ethiopia: Policies and PerformancesCereal Markets in Ethiopia: Policies and Performances
Cereal Markets in Ethiopia: Policies and Performancesessp2
 
Personal public private social security saving accounts
Personal public private social security saving accounts Personal public private social security saving accounts
Personal public private social security saving accounts Matias Zelikowicz
 
Heesen san diego venture group - 2012-01-24
Heesen   san diego venture group - 2012-01-24Heesen   san diego venture group - 2012-01-24
Heesen san diego venture group - 2012-01-24San Diego Venture Group
 
Social vulnerability to natural hazards in China
Social vulnerability to natural hazards in ChinaSocial vulnerability to natural hazards in China
Social vulnerability to natural hazards in ChinaGlobal Risk Forum GRFDavos
 
2003 Soa.Washington.Low Rate
2003 Soa.Washington.Low Rate2003 Soa.Washington.Low Rate
2003 Soa.Washington.Low Ratepinchung
 
From Oecd To SNR
From Oecd To SNRFrom Oecd To SNR
From Oecd To SNR30088
 
Wfs Conference Martin De Wit
Wfs Conference   Martin De WitWfs Conference   Martin De Wit
Wfs Conference Martin De WitMichael Lee
 
Wfs talk presentation final pdf
Wfs talk presentation final pdfWfs talk presentation final pdf
Wfs talk presentation final pdfMartin de Wit
 
IMPACT OF LNG AS ENERGY FUEL MIX FOR END USER: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE
IMPACT OF LNG AS ENERGY FUEL MIX FOR END USER:A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVEIMPACT OF LNG AS ENERGY FUEL MIX FOR END USER:A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE
IMPACT OF LNG AS ENERGY FUEL MIX FOR END USER: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVEIPPAI
 
Web 2.0: La Nueva era de las Comunicaciones en los Negocios
Web 2.0: La Nueva era de las Comunicaciones en los NegociosWeb 2.0: La Nueva era de las Comunicaciones en los Negocios
Web 2.0: La Nueva era de las Comunicaciones en los NegociosMundo Contact
 
Four degrees and beyond: What might this mean for agriculture in sub-Saharan ...
Four degrees and beyond: What might this mean for agriculture in sub-Saharan ...Four degrees and beyond: What might this mean for agriculture in sub-Saharan ...
Four degrees and beyond: What might this mean for agriculture in sub-Saharan ...ILRI
 
Is there an ideal farming system to maximise stored soil water in the Eastern...
Is there an ideal farming system to maximise stored soil water in the Eastern...Is there an ideal farming system to maximise stored soil water in the Eastern...
Is there an ideal farming system to maximise stored soil water in the Eastern...Joanna Hicks
 
SIU AEC Aug 2011
SIU AEC Aug 2011 SIU AEC Aug 2011
SIU AEC Aug 2011 chaismart
 
SIU AEC aug 2011
SIU AEC aug 2011 SIU AEC aug 2011
SIU AEC aug 2011 chaismart
 
Uae Healthcare Outlook
Uae Healthcare OutlookUae Healthcare Outlook
Uae Healthcare Outlookdrharishpillai
 
Falling FDI in 2008
Falling FDI in 2008Falling FDI in 2008
Falling FDI in 2008rangerqu
 
April 2009 Philadelphia Housing Market
April 2009 Philadelphia Housing MarketApril 2009 Philadelphia Housing Market
April 2009 Philadelphia Housing MarketRajeev Sajja
 

Ähnlich wie MyTownCryer Mid Year 2010 Analysis (20)

Intellectual property Strategy
Intellectual property StrategyIntellectual property Strategy
Intellectual property Strategy
 
Cereal Markets in Ethiopia: Policies and Performances
Cereal Markets in Ethiopia: Policies and PerformancesCereal Markets in Ethiopia: Policies and Performances
Cereal Markets in Ethiopia: Policies and Performances
 
Personal public private social security saving accounts
Personal public private social security saving accounts Personal public private social security saving accounts
Personal public private social security saving accounts
 
Heesen san diego venture group - 2012-01-24
Heesen   san diego venture group - 2012-01-24Heesen   san diego venture group - 2012-01-24
Heesen san diego venture group - 2012-01-24
 
Social vulnerability to natural hazards in China
Social vulnerability to natural hazards in ChinaSocial vulnerability to natural hazards in China
Social vulnerability to natural hazards in China
 
2003 Soa.Washington.Low Rate
2003 Soa.Washington.Low Rate2003 Soa.Washington.Low Rate
2003 Soa.Washington.Low Rate
 
Producer and Industry Funding of R&D in Africa
Producer and Industry Funding of R&D in AfricaProducer and Industry Funding of R&D in Africa
Producer and Industry Funding of R&D in Africa
 
From Oecd To SNR
From Oecd To SNRFrom Oecd To SNR
From Oecd To SNR
 
Wfs Conference Martin De Wit
Wfs Conference   Martin De WitWfs Conference   Martin De Wit
Wfs Conference Martin De Wit
 
Wfs talk presentation final pdf
Wfs talk presentation final pdfWfs talk presentation final pdf
Wfs talk presentation final pdf
 
IMPACT OF LNG AS ENERGY FUEL MIX FOR END USER: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE
IMPACT OF LNG AS ENERGY FUEL MIX FOR END USER:A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVEIMPACT OF LNG AS ENERGY FUEL MIX FOR END USER:A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE
IMPACT OF LNG AS ENERGY FUEL MIX FOR END USER: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE
 
Web 2.0: La Nueva era de las Comunicaciones en los Negocios
Web 2.0: La Nueva era de las Comunicaciones en los NegociosWeb 2.0: La Nueva era de las Comunicaciones en los Negocios
Web 2.0: La Nueva era de las Comunicaciones en los Negocios
 
Four degrees and beyond: What might this mean for agriculture in sub-Saharan ...
Four degrees and beyond: What might this mean for agriculture in sub-Saharan ...Four degrees and beyond: What might this mean for agriculture in sub-Saharan ...
Four degrees and beyond: What might this mean for agriculture in sub-Saharan ...
 
Is there an ideal farming system to maximise stored soil water in the Eastern...
Is there an ideal farming system to maximise stored soil water in the Eastern...Is there an ideal farming system to maximise stored soil water in the Eastern...
Is there an ideal farming system to maximise stored soil water in the Eastern...
 
SIU AEC Aug 2011
SIU AEC Aug 2011 SIU AEC Aug 2011
SIU AEC Aug 2011
 
SIU AEC aug 2011
SIU AEC aug 2011 SIU AEC aug 2011
SIU AEC aug 2011
 
Uae Healthcare Outlook
Uae Healthcare OutlookUae Healthcare Outlook
Uae Healthcare Outlook
 
Falling FDI in 2008
Falling FDI in 2008Falling FDI in 2008
Falling FDI in 2008
 
The Race for Global Innovation Advantage and U.S. Economic Prospects
The Race for Global Innovation Advantage and U.S. Economic ProspectsThe Race for Global Innovation Advantage and U.S. Economic Prospects
The Race for Global Innovation Advantage and U.S. Economic Prospects
 
April 2009 Philadelphia Housing Market
April 2009 Philadelphia Housing MarketApril 2009 Philadelphia Housing Market
April 2009 Philadelphia Housing Market
 

Mehr von Tom Cryer

Residential Price Trends Feeding into Cherry Creek High School 2010
Residential Price Trends Feeding into Cherry Creek High School 2010Residential Price Trends Feeding into Cherry Creek High School 2010
Residential Price Trends Feeding into Cherry Creek High School 2010Tom Cryer
 
MyTownCryer July, 2010
MyTownCryer July, 2010MyTownCryer July, 2010
MyTownCryer July, 2010Tom Cryer
 
MyTownCryer June, 2010
MyTownCryer June, 2010MyTownCryer June, 2010
MyTownCryer June, 2010Tom Cryer
 
A Three Year Sales History for Foxfield, Colorado 80016
A Three Year Sales History for Foxfield, Colorado 80016A Three Year Sales History for Foxfield, Colorado 80016
A Three Year Sales History for Foxfield, Colorado 80016Tom Cryer
 
AVERAGE PRICE AND TRANSACTION COUNT FOR HIGHLANDS RANCH COLORADO 2010
AVERAGE PRICE AND TRANSACTION COUNT FOR HIGHLANDS RANCH COLORADO 2010AVERAGE PRICE AND TRANSACTION COUNT FOR HIGHLANDS RANCH COLORADO 2010
AVERAGE PRICE AND TRANSACTION COUNT FOR HIGHLANDS RANCH COLORADO 2010Tom Cryer
 
The Social Benefits Of Stable Housing
The Social Benefits Of Stable HousingThe Social Benefits Of Stable Housing
The Social Benefits Of Stable HousingTom Cryer
 
Mother\'s Day Denver 2010
Mother\'s Day Denver 2010Mother\'s Day Denver 2010
Mother\'s Day Denver 2010Tom Cryer
 
AVERAGE PRICE HISTORY LAST THREE YEARS IN GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO
AVERAGE PRICE HISTORY LAST THREE YEARS IN GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADOAVERAGE PRICE HISTORY LAST THREE YEARS IN GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO
AVERAGE PRICE HISTORY LAST THREE YEARS IN GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADOTom Cryer
 
Denver, Colorado Monthly Mls Stats 2010
Denver, Colorado Monthly Mls Stats 2010Denver, Colorado Monthly Mls Stats 2010
Denver, Colorado Monthly Mls Stats 2010Tom Cryer
 
Weekly Economic Financial Commentary March 26, 2010
Weekly Economic Financial Commentary March 26, 2010Weekly Economic Financial Commentary March 26, 2010
Weekly Economic Financial Commentary March 26, 2010Tom Cryer
 
It Pays to Buy Now!
It Pays to Buy Now!It Pays to Buy Now!
It Pays to Buy Now!Tom Cryer
 
Cherry Hills Village March 2010
Cherry Hills Village March 2010Cherry Hills Village March 2010
Cherry Hills Village March 2010Tom Cryer
 
DENVER MARKET WATCH YEAR END 2009
DENVER MARKET WATCH YEAR END 2009DENVER MARKET WATCH YEAR END 2009
DENVER MARKET WATCH YEAR END 2009Tom Cryer
 
February Foreclosure List for Denver, Colorado
February Foreclosure List for Denver, ColoradoFebruary Foreclosure List for Denver, Colorado
February Foreclosure List for Denver, ColoradoTom Cryer
 
Wells Fargo 2010 Annual Outlook
Wells Fargo 2010 Annual OutlookWells Fargo 2010 Annual Outlook
Wells Fargo 2010 Annual OutlookTom Cryer
 
A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF $1M+ TRANSACTIONS IN THE DENVER METRO AREA AS OF ...
A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF $1M+ TRANSACTIONS IN THE DENVER METRO AREA AS OF ...A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF $1M+ TRANSACTIONS IN THE DENVER METRO AREA AS OF ...
A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF $1M+ TRANSACTIONS IN THE DENVER METRO AREA AS OF ...Tom Cryer
 
University Hills Denver, CO Real Estate Report
University Hills Denver, CO Real Estate ReportUniversity Hills Denver, CO Real Estate Report
University Hills Denver, CO Real Estate ReportTom Cryer
 
2009 Us Corporate Relocation Benchmarking Survey
2009 Us Corporate Relocation Benchmarking Survey2009 Us Corporate Relocation Benchmarking Survey
2009 Us Corporate Relocation Benchmarking SurveyTom Cryer
 
University of Denver Community Residential Real Estate Trends
University of Denver Community Residential Real Estate TrendsUniversity of Denver Community Residential Real Estate Trends
University of Denver Community Residential Real Estate TrendsTom Cryer
 
Mortgage Brokers Association Data
Mortgage Brokers Association DataMortgage Brokers Association Data
Mortgage Brokers Association DataTom Cryer
 

Mehr von Tom Cryer (20)

Residential Price Trends Feeding into Cherry Creek High School 2010
Residential Price Trends Feeding into Cherry Creek High School 2010Residential Price Trends Feeding into Cherry Creek High School 2010
Residential Price Trends Feeding into Cherry Creek High School 2010
 
MyTownCryer July, 2010
MyTownCryer July, 2010MyTownCryer July, 2010
MyTownCryer July, 2010
 
MyTownCryer June, 2010
MyTownCryer June, 2010MyTownCryer June, 2010
MyTownCryer June, 2010
 
A Three Year Sales History for Foxfield, Colorado 80016
A Three Year Sales History for Foxfield, Colorado 80016A Three Year Sales History for Foxfield, Colorado 80016
A Three Year Sales History for Foxfield, Colorado 80016
 
AVERAGE PRICE AND TRANSACTION COUNT FOR HIGHLANDS RANCH COLORADO 2010
AVERAGE PRICE AND TRANSACTION COUNT FOR HIGHLANDS RANCH COLORADO 2010AVERAGE PRICE AND TRANSACTION COUNT FOR HIGHLANDS RANCH COLORADO 2010
AVERAGE PRICE AND TRANSACTION COUNT FOR HIGHLANDS RANCH COLORADO 2010
 
The Social Benefits Of Stable Housing
The Social Benefits Of Stable HousingThe Social Benefits Of Stable Housing
The Social Benefits Of Stable Housing
 
Mother\'s Day Denver 2010
Mother\'s Day Denver 2010Mother\'s Day Denver 2010
Mother\'s Day Denver 2010
 
AVERAGE PRICE HISTORY LAST THREE YEARS IN GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO
AVERAGE PRICE HISTORY LAST THREE YEARS IN GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADOAVERAGE PRICE HISTORY LAST THREE YEARS IN GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO
AVERAGE PRICE HISTORY LAST THREE YEARS IN GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO
 
Denver, Colorado Monthly Mls Stats 2010
Denver, Colorado Monthly Mls Stats 2010Denver, Colorado Monthly Mls Stats 2010
Denver, Colorado Monthly Mls Stats 2010
 
Weekly Economic Financial Commentary March 26, 2010
Weekly Economic Financial Commentary March 26, 2010Weekly Economic Financial Commentary March 26, 2010
Weekly Economic Financial Commentary March 26, 2010
 
It Pays to Buy Now!
It Pays to Buy Now!It Pays to Buy Now!
It Pays to Buy Now!
 
Cherry Hills Village March 2010
Cherry Hills Village March 2010Cherry Hills Village March 2010
Cherry Hills Village March 2010
 
DENVER MARKET WATCH YEAR END 2009
DENVER MARKET WATCH YEAR END 2009DENVER MARKET WATCH YEAR END 2009
DENVER MARKET WATCH YEAR END 2009
 
February Foreclosure List for Denver, Colorado
February Foreclosure List for Denver, ColoradoFebruary Foreclosure List for Denver, Colorado
February Foreclosure List for Denver, Colorado
 
Wells Fargo 2010 Annual Outlook
Wells Fargo 2010 Annual OutlookWells Fargo 2010 Annual Outlook
Wells Fargo 2010 Annual Outlook
 
A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF $1M+ TRANSACTIONS IN THE DENVER METRO AREA AS OF ...
A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF $1M+ TRANSACTIONS IN THE DENVER METRO AREA AS OF ...A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF $1M+ TRANSACTIONS IN THE DENVER METRO AREA AS OF ...
A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF $1M+ TRANSACTIONS IN THE DENVER METRO AREA AS OF ...
 
University Hills Denver, CO Real Estate Report
University Hills Denver, CO Real Estate ReportUniversity Hills Denver, CO Real Estate Report
University Hills Denver, CO Real Estate Report
 
2009 Us Corporate Relocation Benchmarking Survey
2009 Us Corporate Relocation Benchmarking Survey2009 Us Corporate Relocation Benchmarking Survey
2009 Us Corporate Relocation Benchmarking Survey
 
University of Denver Community Residential Real Estate Trends
University of Denver Community Residential Real Estate TrendsUniversity of Denver Community Residential Real Estate Trends
University of Denver Community Residential Real Estate Trends
 
Mortgage Brokers Association Data
Mortgage Brokers Association DataMortgage Brokers Association Data
Mortgage Brokers Association Data
 

MyTownCryer Mid Year 2010 Analysis

  • 1. MID YEAR 2010 RESIDENTIAL   MARKET ESTIMATES AND APPARENT TRENDS   FOR THE GREATER METROPOLITAN DENVER   METROLIST & IRES DATA CENTERS    1. FORECLOSURES  a. There is no question we peaked in foreclosure filings in 2008 and  we now have had almost three years of decline.  b. It should be noted right here; Short Sales are have become the  new method by which lenders have been reconciling unpaid debt  with borrowers in large numbers for more than 12 to 18 months.  c. Therefore, we may be past the foreclosure cycle, but the short sale  cycle pedals on hard and fast.   d. We will have 2‐5 more years in this cycle before a more normal  trend is reached not unlike the cycle in the 1980s.  e. It takes as long to recover as it does to get sick!    35000 Arapahoe County 30000 Jefferson County Denver County 25000 Douglas County 20000 Boulder County Adams County 15000 Broomfield County 10000 Total Metro Area 5000 0 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010    
  • 2. 2. SALES TO LISTING RATIOS  a. The ratio of sales to listings has been of paramount importance to  predicting the health of a market for many years.  b. What we are seeing right now is an estimated trend of rapidly  increasing supply and the absorption from sales activity  remaining constant.  c. This is creating a trend or movement toward over supply.   d. If the second half of 2010 were to continue on this same trend line  as the first six months, we will drift into an oversupply market  creating more foreclosure and short sale potential.  Ratio of Listings to Sales 4.00 3.00 Ratio 2.00 1.00 0.00 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 Date     3. AVERAGE PRICE TRENDS  a. Average price trends should only be considered as a guide to  market conditions and not an absolute for all properties in a given  market place.  b. In the first half of 2010, we have seen average prices inch up.  c. They have increased significantly in areas that have higher end  inventory, because we have seen increased activity there due to  the new price paradigm which is often 20, 30, 40 and even 50% of  2007 values.  d. This elevates the average price particularly if there is less activity  at the lower end of the market as we have seen since the Tax  Credits were eliminated from this equation.  e. Overall, average prices are up, but in many individual MLS areas,  prices have actually declined.  f. Remember, each and every enclave, community or neighborhood  needs to be addressed for their own individual price trend.   Average prices can only be used as a guide, and then and only 
  • 3. then can they assist with computing the health of a residential  market area.  History of Average Residential Prices in Denver Metro Area $700,000 $600,000 ALL AREAS $500,000 DSE $400,000 SSE Price $300,000 DEC/DHR/DHL $200,000 $100,000 $0 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Date     4. MARKET SHARE BY PRICE RANGE & SUPPLY OF INVENTORY  a. There is much to learn from this next chart.  It can tell us the story  about the health of the market.  b. Is the market growing in the higher priced market segment or is it  growing at the bottom of the price ladder?  c. Here’s what we know.  In the last 6 months, there has been  considerable growth in the middle of the market from $200K to  $750K.    d. This makes sense since we literally ran out of inventory under  $200K due to the tax credits, the $200‐400K price segment grew  by almost 2% in just 6 months.  e. We know from NAR data that each entry level transaction creates  an upward movement of parties to the market place hopefully  displacing residents along the way until there have been 6 more  transactions.  (Keep in mind, many of the bank owned properties  were vacant at the time of sale a less “friction” in the market place  resulted.)  f. We know the higher the price the greater the months’ supply of  inventory.  This has historically been a result of greater builder  margins therefore more supply was created at this end of the  market, but with virtually no new construction in the market at 
  • 4. this time, this suggests significant weakness for price  improvement in this segment moving forward.  MONTHS SUPPLY 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 MONTHS SUPPLY 5 0     g. Additionally, we know, the higher the price the smaller the market  share in terms of the number of transactions.  This trend has  never changed as long as this chart has been compiled.  % MKT SHARE 120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% % MKT SHARE 20.00% 0.00%     5. IN CLOSING  a. There are always competing ways to read the data and present  the data in any report. 
  • 5. b. The data in this analysis has been presented in this fashion since  1975.    c. The result has been a relatively accurate method of predicting  future trends in this market place.  d. Everything points toward more of the same.  i. Uncertainty  ii. Price sensitivity  iii. Inventory teetering on the tipping point of dangerous  oversupply  iv. External factors affecting consumer sentiment which affects  home buying confidence  v. The cost of borrowing  vi. The cost of energy  vii. Residential taxes  e. As a result, we can’t bet on price appreciation to “bail out” the  price depressed residential market any time soon.  f. It’s going to take some time to heal all these wounds.    All data obtained, compiled and edited from Metrolist, Inc. which compiles their data from  individual Realtor sources.  This report was completed by Tom Cryer, SCRP Broker Associate  with The Kentwood Company.  Information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but  not guaranteed.   
  • 6. FORECLOSURES BY COUNTY AND METRO DENVER AREA TOTAL MID YEAR 2010 (ESTIMATED) 35000 Arapahoe County 30000 Jefferson County Denver County 25000 Douglas County 20000 Boulder County Adams County 15000 Broomfield County 10000 Total Metro Area 5000 0 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010
  • 7. Total # of Listings and Sales at Mid Year 2010 Denver MLS System YEAR LISTINGS SALES RATIO Total Count Total Count 12/31/75 35,728 19,156 1.87 Potential negative market signal (Above 2.50) 12/31/76 40,223 24,354 1.65 Potential positive market signal (Below 2.00) 12/31/77 41,598 29,875 1.39 Potential neutral market signal (Between 2.00 & 2.50) 12/31/78 49,675 31,213 1.59 Too soon to tell // Year to date // Inconclusive 12/31/79 59,384 31,024 1.91 Indicates all time high or low 12/31/80 55,438 23,952 2.31 12/31/81 49,755 22,125 2.25 12/31/82 52,817 18,756 2.82 12/31/83 63,585 23,566 2.70 12/31/84 69,041 23,264 2.97 12/31/85 73,279 24,489 2.99 12/31/86 75,694 25,865 2.93 12/31/87 69,740 23,414 2.98 12/31/88 62,521 24,120 2.59 12/31/89 50,112 25,142 1.99 12/31/90 53,682 26,436 2.03 12/31/91 53,286 27,375 1.95 12/31/92 48,103 34,828 1.38 12/31/93 69,118 40,291 1.72 12/31/94 73,637 40,068 1.84 12/31/95 78,969 37,767 2.09 12/31/96 84,909 39,849 2.13 12/31/97 90,813 41,959 2.16 12/31/98 103,402 47,836 2.16 12/31/99 72,842 48,795 1.49 12/31/00 100,672 50,499 1.99 12/31/01 133,688 49,372 2.71 12/27/02 138,445 49,326 2.81 12/29/03 123,596 47,731 2.59 12/31/04 127,989 53,710 2.38 12/31/05 135,008 54,072 2.50 12/31/06 152,807 52,220 2.93 12/31/07 143,400 51,304 2.80 12/31/08 123,655 48,926 2.53 12/31/09 104,330 48,926 2.13 12/31/10 125,954 42,892 2.94 MID YEAR 7/1/2008 (EST) LISTINGS SALES RATIO Res 92,894 33,012 2.81 Cond 26,772 8,968 2.99 Land 4,134 452 9.15 Inc 2,154 460 4.68 Totals 125,954 42,892 2.94 Ratio of Listings to Sales 4.00 3.00 Ratio 2.00 1.00 0.00 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 Date Information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. All data obtained from year to date statistics provided by Metrolist, Inc. and compiled by Tom Cryer, SCRP Broker Associate with The Kentwood Company
  • 8. MID YEAR 2010 AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL PRICES IN THE DENVER METROLIST SYSTEM YEAR ALL AREAS DSE SSE DEC/DHR/DHL 1974 $34,722 $36,668 $50,912 $36,291 1975 $35,921 $36,381 $52,938 $59,250 1976 $39,740 $43,195 $61,135 $60,925 1977 $44,876 $50,825 $67,072 $64,473 1978 $55,610 $64,650 $83,446 $77,178 1979 $66,051 $77,648 $96,058 $80,129 1980 $78,594 $97,128 $127,856 $94,337 1981 $83,893 $98,263 $149,426 $101,684 1982 $87,816 $105,454 $161,047 $108,409 1983 $90,346 $109,035 $169,407 $113,755 1984 $95,137 $112,423 $167,934 $132,430 1985 $95,447 $112,415 $160,672 $119,942 1986 $97,049 $113,650 $170,716 $137,264 1987 $102,773 $116,006 $171,634 $137,204 1988 $98,937 $114,095 $171,848 $127,303 1989 $103,868 $117,491 $173,571 $133,061 1990 $102,848 $120,200 $194,900 $151,544 1991 $109,071 $120,485 $207,658 $146,456 1992 $115,154 $127,078 $212,173 $154,699 1993 $126,168 $140,513 $251,099 $164,913 1994 $138,301 $156,144 $278,046 $184,909 1995 $150,736 $172,185 $292,631 $192,643 1996 $159,328 $185,406 $315,670 $193,398 1997 $169,587 $201,601 $315,143 $205,132 1998 $185,785 $226,862 $358,542 $211,589 1999 $208,296 $259,311 $433,756 $231,368 2000 $257,394 $325,126 $492,378 $305,952 2001 $239,779 $301,211 $506,959 $277,089 2002 $268 926 $268,926 $348 850 $348,850 $507 371 $507,371 $315 375 $315,375 2003 $279,279 $365,652 $497,179 $315,402 2004 $290,876 $387,094 $527,605 $342,193 2005 $309,047 $426,258 $602,644 $355,242 2006 $317,112 $468,266 $589,911 $361,927 2007 $310,418 $486,515 $595,345 $372,880 2008 $270,261 $461,630 $529,667 $362,328 2009 $241,876 $435,726 $490,787 $358,684 2010 $252,041 $425,402 $485,992 $359,179 Mid Year History of Average Residential Prices in Denver Metro Area $700,000 $600,000 ALL AREAS $500,000 DSE $400,000 SSE Price $300,000 DEC/DHR/DHL $200,000 $100,000 $0 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Date Information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. All data obtained from Metrolist, Inc. and compiled by Tom Cryer, SCRP Broker Associate with The Kentwood Company.
  • 9. DENVER METRO SINGLE FAMILY MARKET SHARE BY PRICE RANGE AS OF MID YEAR 2010** **Annualized LISTING RANGES ACTIVE LISTINGS UNDER CONTRACT SALES % MKT SHARE ALL PRICES 24,731 5,288 41,174 100.00% $0‐200K 6,175 2,327 16,227 39.41% $200‐400K 10,670 2,091 18,679 45.37% $400‐750K 5,249 741 5,440 13.21% $750K‐1M 1306 105 689 1.67% $1M + 1,639 89 533 1.29% 100.96%  SUPPLY IN MONTHS OF SFR INVENTORY LISTING RANGES TOTAL # SALES MONTHS SUPPLY ALL PRICES 41,174 7.21 $0‐200K 16227 4.57 $200‐400K 18679 6.85 $400‐750K 5440 11.58 $750K‐1M 689 22.75 $1M + 533 36.90