SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 2
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
PROFFER AGREEMENT
With respect to the meeting of (“Client”) and his attorney,
with Assistant United States Attorney to be held at the
Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York on November 1, 2021
(“the meeting”), the following understandings exist:
(1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to
provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government
may evaluate Client’s information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving
Client’s proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client’s behalf or to enter
into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The
Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached
in connection with this proffer.
(2) In any prosecution brought against Client by this Office, except as provided below the
Government will not offer in evidence on its case-in-chief, or in connection with any sentencing
proceeding for the purpose of determining an appropriate sentence, any statements made by Client
at the meeting, except (a) in a prosecution for false statements, obstruction of justice or perjury
with respect to any acts committed or statements made during or after the meeting or testimony
given after the meeting; or (b) if, at any time following the meeting, Client becomes a fugitive
from justice.
(3) Notwithstanding item (2) above: (a) the Government may use information derived
directly or indirectly from the meeting for the purpose of obtaining leads to other evidence, which
evidence may be used in any prosecution of Client by the Government; (b) in any prosecution
brought against Client, the Government may use statements made by Client at the meeting and all
evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom for the purpose of cross-examination should
Client testify; and (c) the Government may also use statements made by Client at the meeting to
rebut any evidence or arguments offered by or on behalf of Client (including arguments made or
issues raised sua sponte by the District Court) at any stage of the criminal prosecution (including
bail, all phases of trial, and sentencing) in any prosecution brought against Client.
(4) The Client understands and agrees that in the event the Client seeks to qualify for a
reduction in sentence under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3553(f), United States
Sentencing Guidelines, Sections 2D1.1(b)(18) or 5C1.2, or Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b), the Office may
offer or use at any stage of the criminal proceeding any statement made by Client during the
meeting, and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom, to the extent such use is
consistent with Section 402 of the First Step Act of 2018.
(5) To the extent that the Government is entitled under this Agreement to offer in evidence
any statements made by Client or leads obtained therefrom, Client shall assert no claim under the
United States Constitution, any statute, Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, or any other
federal rule that such statements or any leads therefrom should be suppressed. It is the intent of
this Agreement to waive all rights in the foregoing respects.
2020.12.11
(6) If this Office receives a request from another prosecutor’s office for access to
information obtained pursuant to this Proffer Agreement, this Office may furnish such information
but will do so only on the condition that the requesting office honor the provisions of this
Agreement.
(7) It is further understood that this Agreement is limited to the statements made by Client
at the meeting and does not apply to any oral, written or recorded statements made by Client at
any other time. No understandings, promises, agreements and/or conditions have been entered
into with respect to the meeting other than those set forth in this Agreement and none will be
entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties.
(8) The understandings set forth in paragraphs 1 through 7 above extend to the continuation
of this meeting on the dates that appear below.
(9) Client and Attorney acknowledge that they have fully discussed and understand every
paragraph and clause in this Agreement and the consequences thereof.
Dated: New York, New York
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
by: _____________________________
Assistant United Sates Attorney
______________________________
Witness
Initials of counsel, Client, AUSA, witness
____ _______ ______ ______
November ___, 2021
___________________________
Client
___________________________
Attorney for Client
Dates of Continuation
___________________
___________________
____ _______ ______ ______

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie SDNY Redacted Proffer Agreement

Former State Rep Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy
Former State Rep Pleads Guilty to  ConspiracyFormer State Rep Pleads Guilty to  Conspiracy
Former State Rep Pleads Guilty to ConspiracyAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Charitable and religious trusts act
Charitable and religious trusts actCharitable and religious trusts act
Charitable and religious trusts actLeo Lukose
 
Virginia Rules of The Court
Virginia Rules of The CourtVirginia Rules of The Court
Virginia Rules of The CourtChuck Thompson
 
Mutual nda innoppl 2014
Mutual nda innoppl 2014Mutual nda innoppl 2014
Mutual nda innoppl 2014Nash Ogden
 
EOUSA 445& -·- .. . . ;;-I[! IN THE UNITED STAT
EOUSA 445& -·- .. . . ;;-I[! IN THE UNITED STATEOUSA 445& -·- .. . . ;;-I[! IN THE UNITED STAT
EOUSA 445& -·- .. . . ;;-I[! IN THE UNITED STATTanaMaeskm
 
Conduct of arbitral proceeding part 2 vaibhav goyal
Conduct of arbitral proceeding  part 2 vaibhav goyalConduct of arbitral proceeding  part 2 vaibhav goyal
Conduct of arbitral proceeding part 2 vaibhav goyalVaibhav Goyal
 
California anti slapp law (statute 425-16(e)(1-4)
California anti slapp law (statute 425-16(e)(1-4)California anti slapp law (statute 425-16(e)(1-4)
California anti slapp law (statute 425-16(e)(1-4)VogelDenise
 
Omnibus motion bribery-J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
Omnibus motion bribery-J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEYOmnibus motion bribery-J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
Omnibus motion bribery-J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEYjjohnsebastianattorney
 
SEC Proffer Agreement.pdf
SEC Proffer Agreement.pdfSEC Proffer Agreement.pdf
SEC Proffer Agreement.pdfTodd Spodek
 
Mutual nda innoppl 2015
Mutual nda innoppl 2015Mutual nda innoppl 2015
Mutual nda innoppl 2015Nash Ogden
 
nda draft.docx
nda draft.docxnda draft.docx
nda draft.docxFairFASST
 
Bluewater Confidentiality Agreement
Bluewater Confidentiality AgreementBluewater Confidentiality Agreement
Bluewater Confidentiality AgreementTerry5
 
Uae civil procedure code2
Uae civil procedure code2Uae civil procedure code2
Uae civil procedure code2quest2900
 

Ähnlich wie SDNY Redacted Proffer Agreement (20)

Former State Rep Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy
Former State Rep Pleads Guilty to  ConspiracyFormer State Rep Pleads Guilty to  Conspiracy
Former State Rep Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy
 
Charitable and religious trusts act
Charitable and religious trusts actCharitable and religious trusts act
Charitable and religious trusts act
 
Virginia Rules of The Court
Virginia Rules of The CourtVirginia Rules of The Court
Virginia Rules of The Court
 
Fpr pd3 a
Fpr pd3 aFpr pd3 a
Fpr pd3 a
 
Fpr pd3 a
Fpr pd3 aFpr pd3 a
Fpr pd3 a
 
Mutual nda innoppl 2014
Mutual nda innoppl 2014Mutual nda innoppl 2014
Mutual nda innoppl 2014
 
EOUSA 445& -·- .. . . ;;-I[! IN THE UNITED STAT
EOUSA 445& -·- .. . . ;;-I[! IN THE UNITED STATEOUSA 445& -·- .. . . ;;-I[! IN THE UNITED STAT
EOUSA 445& -·- .. . . ;;-I[! IN THE UNITED STAT
 
Conduct of arbitral proceeding part 2 vaibhav goyal
Conduct of arbitral proceeding  part 2 vaibhav goyalConduct of arbitral proceeding  part 2 vaibhav goyal
Conduct of arbitral proceeding part 2 vaibhav goyal
 
Fpr pd31 a
Fpr pd31 aFpr pd31 a
Fpr pd31 a
 
MUTUAL CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT
MUTUAL CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT MUTUAL CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT
MUTUAL CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT
 
California anti slapp law (statute 425-16(e)(1-4)
California anti slapp law (statute 425-16(e)(1-4)California anti slapp law (statute 425-16(e)(1-4)
California anti slapp law (statute 425-16(e)(1-4)
 
Omnibus motion bribery-J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
Omnibus motion bribery-J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEYOmnibus motion bribery-J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
Omnibus motion bribery-J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
 
SEC Proffer Agreement.pdf
SEC Proffer Agreement.pdfSEC Proffer Agreement.pdf
SEC Proffer Agreement.pdf
 
Mutual nda innoppl 2015
Mutual nda innoppl 2015Mutual nda innoppl 2015
Mutual nda innoppl 2015
 
CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT
CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTCLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT
CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT
 
nda draft.docx
nda draft.docxnda draft.docx
nda draft.docx
 
RULE-57-by-Duruin-Kriska.pptx
RULE-57-by-Duruin-Kriska.pptxRULE-57-by-Duruin-Kriska.pptx
RULE-57-by-Duruin-Kriska.pptx
 
Bluewater Confidentiality Agreement
Bluewater Confidentiality AgreementBluewater Confidentiality Agreement
Bluewater Confidentiality Agreement
 
Uae civil procedure code2
Uae civil procedure code2Uae civil procedure code2
Uae civil procedure code2
 
Fpr pd17 a
Fpr pd17 aFpr pd17 a
Fpr pd17 a
 

Mehr von Todd Spodek

5-6-24 David Kennedy Article Law 360.pdf
5-6-24 David Kennedy Article Law 360.pdf5-6-24 David Kennedy Article Law 360.pdf
5-6-24 David Kennedy Article Law 360.pdfTodd Spodek
 
Client Information Packet -Supplement to Prob 1.pdf
Client Information Packet -Supplement to Prob 1.pdfClient Information Packet -Supplement to Prob 1.pdf
Client Information Packet -Supplement to Prob 1.pdfTodd Spodek
 
Ex-Schechter School of Long Island CFO David Ostrove gave co-worker $30,000 g...
Ex-Schechter School of Long Island CFO David Ostrove gave co-worker $30,000 g...Ex-Schechter School of Long Island CFO David Ostrove gave co-worker $30,000 g...
Ex-Schechter School of Long Island CFO David Ostrove gave co-worker $30,000 g...Todd Spodek
 
Witness_ Budget, finance committee oversaw work of Schechter School of Long I...
Witness_ Budget, finance committee oversaw work of Schechter School of Long I...Witness_ Budget, finance committee oversaw work of Schechter School of Long I...
Witness_ Budget, finance committee oversaw work of Schechter School of Long I...Todd Spodek
 
Designation Notice from the US Marshalls
Designation Notice from the US MarshallsDesignation Notice from the US Marshalls
Designation Notice from the US MarshallsTodd Spodek
 
Agreement to Cooperate with Adjustment Services in Kings County Family Court ...
Agreement to Cooperate with Adjustment Services in Kings County Family Court ...Agreement to Cooperate with Adjustment Services in Kings County Family Court ...
Agreement to Cooperate with Adjustment Services in Kings County Family Court ...Todd Spodek
 
Written Waiver of Indictment in Federal Court
Written Waiver of Indictment in Federal CourtWritten Waiver of Indictment in Federal Court
Written Waiver of Indictment in Federal CourtTodd Spodek
 
New York State Family Court Motion to Dismiss
New York State Family Court Motion to DismissNew York State Family Court Motion to Dismiss
New York State Family Court Motion to DismissTodd Spodek
 
New York Family Court Motion to Dismiss a Family Offense Petition
New York Family Court Motion to Dismiss a Family Offense PetitionNew York Family Court Motion to Dismiss a Family Offense Petition
New York Family Court Motion to Dismiss a Family Offense PetitionTodd Spodek
 
Policy-and-Procedures.pdf
Policy-and-Procedures.pdfPolicy-and-Procedures.pdf
Policy-and-Procedures.pdfTodd Spodek
 
Third Party Verification Form Jan 2021.pdf
Third Party Verification Form Jan 2021.pdfThird Party Verification Form Jan 2021.pdf
Third Party Verification Form Jan 2021.pdfTodd Spodek
 
NYCDA_Proffer_Agreement.pdf
NYCDA_Proffer_Agreement.pdfNYCDA_Proffer_Agreement.pdf
NYCDA_Proffer_Agreement.pdfTodd Spodek
 
PSI InternetPacketAllFormsJanuary2023.pdf
PSI InternetPacketAllFormsJanuary2023.pdfPSI InternetPacketAllFormsJanuary2023.pdf
PSI InternetPacketAllFormsJanuary2023.pdfTodd Spodek
 
McGaha_Sentencing_Memorandum_v4.pdf
McGaha_Sentencing_Memorandum_v4.pdfMcGaha_Sentencing_Memorandum_v4.pdf
McGaha_Sentencing_Memorandum_v4.pdfTodd Spodek
 
Desk Appearance Ticket.pdf
Desk Appearance Ticket.pdfDesk Appearance Ticket.pdf
Desk Appearance Ticket.pdfTodd Spodek
 
Advice of Penalties and Sanctions RE Release.pdf
Advice of Penalties and Sanctions RE Release.pdfAdvice of Penalties and Sanctions RE Release.pdf
Advice of Penalties and Sanctions RE Release.pdfTodd Spodek
 
Declaration of Passport and Other Travel Documents
Declaration of Passport and Other Travel Documents Declaration of Passport and Other Travel Documents
Declaration of Passport and Other Travel Documents Todd Spodek
 
Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_ (1).pdf
Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_ (1).pdfNotice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_ (1).pdf
Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_ (1).pdfTodd Spodek
 
23-CR-246__Zhibin_Lai__Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_.pdf
23-CR-246__Zhibin_Lai__Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_.pdf23-CR-246__Zhibin_Lai__Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_.pdf
23-CR-246__Zhibin_Lai__Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_.pdfTodd Spodek
 

Mehr von Todd Spodek (20)

5-6-24 David Kennedy Article Law 360.pdf
5-6-24 David Kennedy Article Law 360.pdf5-6-24 David Kennedy Article Law 360.pdf
5-6-24 David Kennedy Article Law 360.pdf
 
Client Information Packet -Supplement to Prob 1.pdf
Client Information Packet -Supplement to Prob 1.pdfClient Information Packet -Supplement to Prob 1.pdf
Client Information Packet -Supplement to Prob 1.pdf
 
Ex-Schechter School of Long Island CFO David Ostrove gave co-worker $30,000 g...
Ex-Schechter School of Long Island CFO David Ostrove gave co-worker $30,000 g...Ex-Schechter School of Long Island CFO David Ostrove gave co-worker $30,000 g...
Ex-Schechter School of Long Island CFO David Ostrove gave co-worker $30,000 g...
 
Witness_ Budget, finance committee oversaw work of Schechter School of Long I...
Witness_ Budget, finance committee oversaw work of Schechter School of Long I...Witness_ Budget, finance committee oversaw work of Schechter School of Long I...
Witness_ Budget, finance committee oversaw work of Schechter School of Long I...
 
Designation Notice from the US Marshalls
Designation Notice from the US MarshallsDesignation Notice from the US Marshalls
Designation Notice from the US Marshalls
 
Agreement to Cooperate with Adjustment Services in Kings County Family Court ...
Agreement to Cooperate with Adjustment Services in Kings County Family Court ...Agreement to Cooperate with Adjustment Services in Kings County Family Court ...
Agreement to Cooperate with Adjustment Services in Kings County Family Court ...
 
Written Waiver of Indictment in Federal Court
Written Waiver of Indictment in Federal CourtWritten Waiver of Indictment in Federal Court
Written Waiver of Indictment in Federal Court
 
New York State Family Court Motion to Dismiss
New York State Family Court Motion to DismissNew York State Family Court Motion to Dismiss
New York State Family Court Motion to Dismiss
 
New York Family Court Motion to Dismiss a Family Offense Petition
New York Family Court Motion to Dismiss a Family Offense PetitionNew York Family Court Motion to Dismiss a Family Offense Petition
New York Family Court Motion to Dismiss a Family Offense Petition
 
Policy-and-Procedures.pdf
Policy-and-Procedures.pdfPolicy-and-Procedures.pdf
Policy-and-Procedures.pdf
 
Third Party Verification Form Jan 2021.pdf
Third Party Verification Form Jan 2021.pdfThird Party Verification Form Jan 2021.pdf
Third Party Verification Form Jan 2021.pdf
 
NYCDA_Proffer_Agreement.pdf
NYCDA_Proffer_Agreement.pdfNYCDA_Proffer_Agreement.pdf
NYCDA_Proffer_Agreement.pdf
 
Corob
CorobCorob
Corob
 
PSI InternetPacketAllFormsJanuary2023.pdf
PSI InternetPacketAllFormsJanuary2023.pdfPSI InternetPacketAllFormsJanuary2023.pdf
PSI InternetPacketAllFormsJanuary2023.pdf
 
McGaha_Sentencing_Memorandum_v4.pdf
McGaha_Sentencing_Memorandum_v4.pdfMcGaha_Sentencing_Memorandum_v4.pdf
McGaha_Sentencing_Memorandum_v4.pdf
 
Desk Appearance Ticket.pdf
Desk Appearance Ticket.pdfDesk Appearance Ticket.pdf
Desk Appearance Ticket.pdf
 
Advice of Penalties and Sanctions RE Release.pdf
Advice of Penalties and Sanctions RE Release.pdfAdvice of Penalties and Sanctions RE Release.pdf
Advice of Penalties and Sanctions RE Release.pdf
 
Declaration of Passport and Other Travel Documents
Declaration of Passport and Other Travel Documents Declaration of Passport and Other Travel Documents
Declaration of Passport and Other Travel Documents
 
Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_ (1).pdf
Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_ (1).pdfNotice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_ (1).pdf
Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_ (1).pdf
 
23-CR-246__Zhibin_Lai__Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_.pdf
23-CR-246__Zhibin_Lai__Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_.pdf23-CR-246__Zhibin_Lai__Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_.pdf
23-CR-246__Zhibin_Lai__Notice_of_Motion_Rule_7_b_.pdf
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Sangyun Lee, Duplicate Powers in the Criminal Referral Process and the Overla...
Sangyun Lee, Duplicate Powers in the Criminal Referral Process and the Overla...Sangyun Lee, Duplicate Powers in the Criminal Referral Process and the Overla...
Sangyun Lee, Duplicate Powers in the Criminal Referral Process and the Overla...Sangyun Lee
 
一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理e9733fc35af6
 
一比一原版悉尼科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版悉尼科技大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版悉尼科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版悉尼科技大学毕业证如何办理e9733fc35af6
 
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentationPerformance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentationKhushdeep Kaur
 
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam TakersPhilippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam TakersJillianAsdala
 
一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理Airst S
 
Reason Behind the Success of Law Firms in India
Reason Behind the Success of Law Firms in IndiaReason Behind the Success of Law Firms in India
Reason Behind the Success of Law Firms in IndiaYash
 
一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理Airst S
 
一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理e9733fc35af6
 
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSSASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSSCssSpamx
 
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理Airst S
 
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理Airst S
 
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理Airst S
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubham Wadhonkar
 
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.pptseri bangash
 
Interpretation of statute topics for project
Interpretation of statute topics for projectInterpretation of statute topics for project
Interpretation of statute topics for projectVarshRR
 
Elective Course on Forensic Science in Law
Elective Course on Forensic Science  in LawElective Course on Forensic Science  in Law
Elective Course on Forensic Science in LawNilendra Kumar
 
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理ss
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Chambers Global Practice Guide - Canada M&A
Chambers Global Practice Guide - Canada M&AChambers Global Practice Guide - Canada M&A
Chambers Global Practice Guide - Canada M&A
 
Sangyun Lee, Duplicate Powers in the Criminal Referral Process and the Overla...
Sangyun Lee, Duplicate Powers in the Criminal Referral Process and the Overla...Sangyun Lee, Duplicate Powers in the Criminal Referral Process and the Overla...
Sangyun Lee, Duplicate Powers in the Criminal Referral Process and the Overla...
 
一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版悉尼科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版悉尼科技大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版悉尼科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版悉尼科技大学毕业证如何办理
 
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentationPerformance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
 
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam TakersPhilippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
 
一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理
 
Reason Behind the Success of Law Firms in India
Reason Behind the Success of Law Firms in IndiaReason Behind the Success of Law Firms in India
Reason Behind the Success of Law Firms in India
 
一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理
 
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSSASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
 
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
 
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
 
Interpretation of statute topics for project
Interpretation of statute topics for projectInterpretation of statute topics for project
Interpretation of statute topics for project
 
Elective Course on Forensic Science in Law
Elective Course on Forensic Science  in LawElective Course on Forensic Science  in Law
Elective Course on Forensic Science in Law
 
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
 
It’s Not Easy Being Green: Ethical Pitfalls for Bankruptcy Novices
It’s Not Easy Being Green: Ethical Pitfalls for Bankruptcy NovicesIt’s Not Easy Being Green: Ethical Pitfalls for Bankruptcy Novices
It’s Not Easy Being Green: Ethical Pitfalls for Bankruptcy Novices
 

SDNY Redacted Proffer Agreement

  • 1. PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of (“Client”) and his attorney, with Assistant United States Attorney to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York on November 1, 2021 (“the meeting”), the following understandings exist: (1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client’s information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client’s proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client’s behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brought against Client by this Office, except as provided below the Government will not offer in evidence on its case-in-chief, or in connection with any sentencing proceeding for the purpose of determining an appropriate sentence, any statements made by Client at the meeting, except (a) in a prosecution for false statements, obstruction of justice or perjury with respect to any acts committed or statements made during or after the meeting or testimony given after the meeting; or (b) if, at any time following the meeting, Client becomes a fugitive from justice. (3) Notwithstanding item (2) above: (a) the Government may use information derived directly or indirectly from the meeting for the purpose of obtaining leads to other evidence, which evidence may be used in any prosecution of Client by the Government; (b) in any prosecution brought against Client, the Government may use statements made by Client at the meeting and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom for the purpose of cross-examination should Client testify; and (c) the Government may also use statements made by Client at the meeting to rebut any evidence or arguments offered by or on behalf of Client (including arguments made or issues raised sua sponte by the District Court) at any stage of the criminal prosecution (including bail, all phases of trial, and sentencing) in any prosecution brought against Client. (4) The Client understands and agrees that in the event the Client seeks to qualify for a reduction in sentence under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3553(f), United States Sentencing Guidelines, Sections 2D1.1(b)(18) or 5C1.2, or Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b), the Office may offer or use at any stage of the criminal proceeding any statement made by Client during the meeting, and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom, to the extent such use is consistent with Section 402 of the First Step Act of 2018. (5) To the extent that the Government is entitled under this Agreement to offer in evidence any statements made by Client or leads obtained therefrom, Client shall assert no claim under the United States Constitution, any statute, Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, or any other federal rule that such statements or any leads therefrom should be suppressed. It is the intent of this Agreement to waive all rights in the foregoing respects.
  • 2. 2020.12.11 (6) If this Office receives a request from another prosecutor’s office for access to information obtained pursuant to this Proffer Agreement, this Office may furnish such information but will do so only on the condition that the requesting office honor the provisions of this Agreement. (7) It is further understood that this Agreement is limited to the statements made by Client at the meeting and does not apply to any oral, written or recorded statements made by Client at any other time. No understandings, promises, agreements and/or conditions have been entered into with respect to the meeting other than those set forth in this Agreement and none will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. (8) The understandings set forth in paragraphs 1 through 7 above extend to the continuation of this meeting on the dates that appear below. (9) Client and Attorney acknowledge that they have fully discussed and understand every paragraph and clause in this Agreement and the consequences thereof. Dated: New York, New York DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York by: _____________________________ Assistant United Sates Attorney ______________________________ Witness Initials of counsel, Client, AUSA, witness ____ _______ ______ ______ November ___, 2021 ___________________________ Client ___________________________ Attorney for Client Dates of Continuation ___________________ ___________________ ____ _______ ______ ______