SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 14
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mark Mondello and Arya Rahimian (Duff and Phelps) Prof. Steve
Moyer and Prof. Julia Plotts (USC Marshall)
FROM: Team One (Tingting Liu, Brian Wang, Claire Wu, and Dongyu Yu)
DATE: December 10, 2014
RE: Stand-Alone Value of HBO
Our team has been requested to perform valuation analysis on the stand-
alone value of HBO, a subsidiary company of Time Warner Cable, Inc. As a
rapidly growing company while seeking further business expansions, online
video streaming, for example, in a relatively competitive media and
entertainment industry. Our task was therefore to reasonably and
professionally value the enterprise as well as equity values of HBO, using
industry research insights, financial knowledge, and various valuation
techniques. We started with conducting extensive research on the industries,
trends, HBO company profiles, etc., followed by performing valuation
analysis using discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, comparable companies
analysis, and precedent transactions analysis. After careful and detailed
deliberation, we are concluding the following result for HBO valuations (in
millions dollars):
Enterprise Value: $32189.0 - $38630.5
Equity Value: $22797.8 - $29239.3
In the following sections, we will explain in detail the methods used,
analysis, and rationales for concluding in such valuations.
I. Company and Industry Overview
HBO (Home Box Office) is a premium television cable and satellite station,
headquartered in New York, USA. Started in 1972, it streams movies,
exclusive television shows, music, documentaries, sports, and various other
entertainment programs. After 42 years of development, HBO, along with its
sister channel Cinemax, is encompassing almost 90% of US paid television
stations market. Some of well-known and popular HBO productions include
Sex and the City, Game of Thrones, Girls, The Newsroom, etc.
HBO is also a premium cable and satellite television network worldwide.
Owned by Home Box Office Inc., a private operating subsidiary of Time
Warner Cable, HBO generated $1.8 billion in operating profit last year,
which is as much as one quarter of the total profit of Time Warner Cable.
A. Business Model
HBO operates on a unique business model that it created 42 years ago: It
provides non stop streaming high-quality, and some unique entertainment
television programs 24/7 for paid subscribers of its 13 channels. Unlike the
majority of US broadcasting and cable television stations, HBO does not
have advertisement placement, which accounts for a huge part of profits for
its peers. The main driver for its income has always been the number of
subscribers, which generates about 80% of HBO’s income. The cost of this
programming varies from $15-$20 per month depending on which major
cable provider the customer uses. The subscription fee is high compared to
other cable stations; however, HBO, using high-quality and exclusivity as
selling points for its products and operating under TTS (total subscriber
satisfaction), profits more than the total of ABC, NBC, CBS, and FOX. In
addition, most companies will offer discounts or even free HBO for 6-12
months.
Next year, HBO is finally planning to start offering stand-alone, online-only
subscription plans, seeking another expansion of its business.
B. Porter’s Five Forces Model
l Buyer Power
In the media and entertainment industry, the bargaining power of buyers
(consumers) is high. This bargaining power is due in part to the economy in
that if low cost alternatives are available, more families are likely to choose
them. The availability of substitutes increases the bargaining power of
consumers, as the ultimate purchaser of entertainment products and services
increase. Consumers have a very wide selection of programming to choose
from and ease of access through increased online programming and sources
of entertainment. Increased globalization also adds to the bargaining power
of the consumer.
l Supplier Power
The bargaining power of suppliers varies by supplier type in the media and
entertainment industry. The value chain of many of the production
companies is primarily handled in-house, but more companies are
outsourcing to cut costs in order to keep, or attain, a competitive advantage.
This strategy especially lowers the bargaining power of American suppliers
since suppliers overseas will provide the same services for a fraction of the
cost, with varying degrees of quality. The industry has also seen an increase
in the number of suppliers as a result of increased outsourcing, which also
results in lower bargaining power of supplies as competition at their level
increases.
As a result of this new decrease in draw, individual companies have
attempted to secure high-profile stars through multi-year or multi-show
contracts, and as a result reduce their future bargaining power.
l The Threat of the New Entrant
The threat of new entrants into any industry depends on the strength of the
barriers to entry, and the resulting response of existing competitors. The
threat of new entrants to the media and entertainment industry is relatively
low. This industry is seen to have established companies and conglomerates
with significant presence in media networks and television productions, thus
creating a significant barrier to entry.
The threat of new entrants is so low, in fact, that industry insiders are
concerned that new, independent producers are prevented from having their
voices heard and getting their new, innovative products into the market. The
evolution of Internet distribution channels is making this less of a concern
with its accessibility and immense distribution opportunities.
The high, ongoing financial outlay needed for movie production, or
television series production is also extremely high. For example, production
costs for Disney’s Pirates of the Caribbean movie hit nearly $300 million.
High sunk costs and capital requirements are also heavy entry barriers.
l The Threat of Substitute Product
The most detrimental impact on a corporation happens when there is a high
threat of substitute products or services that is both likely and probable. One
of the major threats of substitution for the media and entertainment industry
is facing the innovation in other industries. According to the PWC M&A
activities report for 2010, “technology giants such as Google Inc. and Apple
Inc. plan to continue to increase their pressure on the entertainment and
media industry by driving convergence.” Both Apple and Google have
become pioneers and market leaders in video distribution.
Netflix, in particular, has become a popular alternative to the expensive costs
of paid televisions resulting in some revenue loss for the entertainment
industry.
l The Rivalry among the Existing Firms in the Industry
All sectors of the media and entertainment industry face daunting challenges
from alternative delivery methods, which has increased the competition
among entertainment delivery platforms. Telecommunications companies
such as AT&T and Verizon are now delivering television programming to
the home via ultra high-speed Internet connections battling cable and
satellite TV firms for market share. Tough economic times often results in a
dog-eat-dog business environment but the opposite can also seen in the
industry.
A strategy being implemented across the industry is one of collaboration in
order to gain a larger market share and competitive advantage against other
industry leaders and collaborators. The goal of industry leaders is to be the
leading pioneer in digital entertainment and create entry barriers for new
entrants once growth becomes more obvious.
C. Current Market Position
For more than a decade, HBO has lavished good, smart product to its
viewers, and in the process of raising the entire industry's creative game. In
the late 1990s, HBO pioneered an intelligent, patient style of storytelling that
gloried in loose ends and morally ambiguous characters a style.
To keep relevant to television audiences, cable channel operators have
started spending huge amounts of money to create hit shows and
programming. Time Warner operates a few leading channels and says that
Home Box Place of work, or HBO for limited, is "majority of the nation’s
widely distributed multi-channel quality pay for television service.”
Furthermore, it competes on an overseas scale and boasts 93 trillion
worldwide subscribers, according to its owner.
The company is also taking steps to make its current competitive position
strong by focusing on its international strategy and strategic alliances. This
major subsidiary of Time Warner Incorporation had signed a deal with
Tencent Holdings Ltd. Through this deal HBO would distribute movies and
TV dramas through the giant online video site on the Chinese internet. In
this way, the US cable network would be expanded in the Chinese market.
This would allow HBO to take the advantage of the massive online user base
in China. HBO could also create an official distribution channel in a market
where the pirated videos are very much common and rampant.
Apart from this, another issue related to this matter is HBO’s new online
streaming serve, which would be basically add-on services on to the
broadband packages with the cable operators and through other technology
partners such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Apple Incorporation. Clearly a
business expansion plan and part of a strategy to deal of key competitors
such as Netflix and Hulu, the online streaming service will probably be a
great hit concerning the current trend.
II. Benchmarking Analysis
Due to the lack of publicly available data for privately owned companies, we
selected seven publicly traded companies that operate in the same industry
as the benchmarks to help determine the value of HBO. We compared
figures such as stock price, P/E, Return on Equity, Enterprise Value and Free
Cash Flow Yield, and narrowed down the comparable companies to four,
which included Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc., CBS Corporation,
DIRECTV, and Netflix, Inc. Moreover, considering the fact that HBO is a
private company, we relevered the beta for HBO based on the on the beta
and D/E ratio we found from these publicly traded companies.
III. Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
A. Key Assumptions
As a private company with limited access to its detailed financial statements,
some historical data from Time Warner’s 2013 financial statements was
used in estimating HBO’s key financials. As shown in Exhibit 1, current
assets, current liabilities, total debt, and cash flow used in investing activities
were all assumed based on average figure among 4 segments of the parent
company.
In addition, several other key assumptions were made based on HBO’s
historical performance and growth potential, potential online streaming
expansion, and global partnerships. Subscriber growth rate was assumed to
grow at a constant rate of 0.2% considering its business expansion, as well
as the fact that HBO had seen the largest increase in subscriptions last year.
Therefore, we assumed the rate would increase. Also, cost of revenue % of
sales was seeing a continuous decrease shown in historical data in Exhibit 2,
we thus assumed that there would be a constant rate of decrease at 2% in
cost of revenue percentage.
Lastly, according to Ibbotson chart, we assumed a 0.8% size premium as
categorized 1⁄4 of Time Warner a large cap. Perpetuity growth rate was an
assumption between 2-3% inflation rate and a 4-5% GDP growth. Besides,
Beta was calculated from benchmarking analysis (Exhibit 6), and exit
multiple was assumed based on multiple range average determined in
comparable companies analysis (Exhibit 7).
B. Financial Statement Projections
Based on the HBO data that we found on Timer Warner Financial Statement,
we were able to project revenue of HBO at first. We calculated the growth
rate of number of subscribers from 2011 to 2013. We used the 2012-2013
growth rate as the base for projections, as the 2012 ratio of over 30% was a
bit abnormal probably due to new hit shows, such as Game of Thrones and
Girls on 2011. The growth rates in the projection period were thus
calculated, assuming the 0.2% increase every year. We then calculated the
subscribers as percentage of sales of 2012, 2013 for 2.5%, 2.6%. We
projected this figure in the projected period as the average 2.55%. The
projected revenue is calculated by dividing the projected subscribers by the
subscribers as percentage of sales.
Critical value such as net SG&A, depreciation & amortization, capital
expenditures, etc. based on percentage of revenues. We assumed 38% as the
tax rate to calculate tax expense. Then we concluded key financials such as
EBIT and Net Income.
With the lack of financial information of HBO, we projected the cash flow
from investing activities by dividing Time Warner’s total cash flow from
investing by 4 (HBO is one of the four segments of Time Warner). Thus,
after concluding three statement projections, we were able to get the net
change of working capital to proceed in the free cash flow calculation.
For one time adjustment, we also included a 1 billion dollar under “other
income” as Tencent announced a deal with HBO this year.
The detail is presented in Exhibit 2.
C. Estimating Enterprise and Equity Value
First, we calculated free cash flow based on the formula. After discounting
the sum into present value, we used both Exit Multiple Method (EMM) and
Perpetuity Growth Method (PGM) for calculating the terminal value. In the
process, we calculated WACC using some data given, and assumptions such
as 38% effective tax rate, and 0.8% Size Premium. We finally determined a
WACC of 8.5%. As for Perpetuity Growth Rate, we determined the growth
rate as 3.5% as explained earlier. After adding the PV of free cash flow and
PV of terminal value, we came to the enterprise values yielded by both
methods. Using Exit Multiple Method (EMM) and PGM, we were able to
estimate HBO’s equity value as $22,797.8 - $29,239.3 million and enterprise
value as $32,189.0 - $38,630.5 million shown in Exhibit 3. 	
  
D. Sensitivity Analysis
Then we performed a sensitivity analysis, adjusting variables such as exit
multiple, perpetuity growth rate, and WACC to test the change of enterprise
value and equity value as results. The detail is shown in Exhibit 4.
E. Scenario Analysis
To more accurately forecasting the valuation considering variabilities of
several key drivers, we performed scenario analysis. We determined that our
assumptions of the increase of subscribers’ growth, cost of revenue decrease,
as well as tax rate were all highly subject to change. Therefore, based on the
current case, we created best, moderate, and worst scenarios changing values
of the three key drivers to come up with valuation of target under different
circumstances. The result is shown in Exhibit 5.
IV. Comparable Companies Analysis
To come up with a list of comparable companies with HBO, we selected
four companies for their similarity in market position and company profiles
with HBO. To calculate multiples such as EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT,
EV/Revenue, P/B and P/E ratio for all of the comparable companies, we
retrieved data such as EBITDA, EBIT, and Enterprise Value from Capital
IQ. We concluded our valuation of HBO’s enterprise value and equity value
based on multiple range estimated by the mean and median of the
comparable companies, we decided to exclude Netflix’s value as a result of
abnormal multiples. As we found out, in substance, Netflix is an Internet &
Computer Company which has much less cost than a Broadcasting & Cable
Company. Therefore Netflix has better operating leverage. Our estimation
was equity value range of being $ 10,775.5 - $23,881.6 and enterprise value
range being $20,166.7 - $33,272.8. The detailed comparable companies
analysis is shown in Exhibit 7.
V. Precedent Transactions Analysis
To create a list of precedent transaction companies, we used transaction
screening on Capital IQ. Narrowing down the list based on criteria such as
industries (TV Broadcasting Stations, Television Production Companies,
Video Production Companies), US geographical location, private target,
mergers & acquisition transaction type, etc., we generated a list of precedent
transactions in the past 5 years. We then further screened the results for
available and reasonable financial multiples. With limited information
provided for private transactions, we tried to create a list of comparable
precedent transactions, focusing in TV Broadcasting industry (with one in
TV Production), as it is the sector that generates most revenue to HBO. This
method yielded an equity value range of $10755.4 - $22536.1 and an
enterprise value range of $17690.0 - $32927.3. The result of precedent
transaction analysis is shown in Exhibit 8.
IV. Valuation Conclusions
Analyzing the results yielded by all three valuation methods, we decided to
conclude our final valuation based solely on DCF result. One obvious
rationale was that both comparable companies analysis and precedent
transactions analyses were based on publicly traded companies, which
apparently differentiates largely from HBO. In addition, HBO’s unique
business model of operating both cable satellite service and the potential
online streaming service separates it from peers, adding the difficulties of
accurate comparable and precedent valuations. The results yielded by this
two methods also proved to be moderately off from the DCF results, due to
the difficulties of finding similar companies or transactions.
Overall, the DCF valuation result was reasonable considering the fact that
the performance of HBO in 2014 was outstanding. HBO had achieved $ 1.8
billion in operating profits over the last year which is equal to about one-
quarter of the Time Warner’s$ 4.9 billion of its annual revenues. Also, the
market and investors are looking at HBO as a profitable and rapidly growing
target with is active business strategy and expansion plan. The impact of
cash flows for future forecasting for HBO stand-alone 2015 program is
positive and it generates positive cash flows during five year forecasting.
The net present values for five year forecasting was positive and this
indicated a healthy enterprise value. HBO therefore should definitely
proceed its planning for standalone streaming in 2015 because they have a
positive net present value and also they can made some solid strategy
regarding financing other project in the future.
HBO can expand their projects in the future as well where they can earn
more profits and get their position according to their mission and vision.
Maximizing Current Valuation
Since the subscribers growth is stagnating in United States of America, the
pay television market was shook up by HBO in an announcement that in the
year 2015 under which the customers would be able to access HBO without
paying any pay television subscription. The new price of the HBO will be
influenced by many factors. First of all, the initial target of HBO being 10
million broadband customers will probably contribute to more sales growth.
Secondly, HBO competes with Netflix, not on the basis of price but content,
providing a more stable and promising future. Thirdly, HBO is not very
likely to have too big of a downfall which affects its current profits.
To further maximize its valuation, the company should spend more efforts
on its promotional activities to keep its incumbent subscribers. Apart from
this, HBO should take steps to expand in the international markets. The
company is examining its options to expand the tactics of the company for
programming distribution such as the cooperation this year with Tencent.
The news was published in the Wall Street Journal, in which it was stated
that it was looking forward to launch Netflix-like services in those countries
that had broadband infrastructure. Some of the choices for HBO to expand
are Japan and Turkey based on its market position. HBO needs to think over
its international expansion strategy before the saturation mark is reached.
	
  
	
  
	
  
Exhibit	
  1:	
  Key	
  Assumptions	
  
Exhibit	
  2:	
  Financial	
  Statements	
  Projections	
  
Exhibit	
  3:	
  Discounted	
  Cash	
  Flow	
  Analysis	
  
Exhibit	
  4:	
  Sensitivity	
  Analysis	
  
Exhibit	
  5:	
  Scenario	
  Analysis	
  
Exhibit	
  6:	
  Benchmarking	
  Analysis	
  
Exhibit	
  7:	
  Comparable	
  Companies	
  Analysis	
  
Exhibit	
  8:	
  Precedent	
  Transactions	
  Analysis	
  
	
  

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Barnes & Noble - marketing plan
Barnes & Noble - marketing plan Barnes & Noble - marketing plan
Barnes & Noble - marketing plan Cole Ericson
 
Netflix: Case study (Indian Perception)
Netflix: Case study (Indian Perception)Netflix: Case study (Indian Perception)
Netflix: Case study (Indian Perception)Shivam Lamba
 
Netflix India - Campaign Planning - Powerpoint Presentation - 2017
Netflix India - Campaign Planning - Powerpoint Presentation - 2017Netflix India - Campaign Planning - Powerpoint Presentation - 2017
Netflix India - Campaign Planning - Powerpoint Presentation - 2017Anjali Kamath
 
Marketing Mix of Netflix
Marketing Mix of NetflixMarketing Mix of Netflix
Marketing Mix of NetflixArwaSangotwala
 
Group case study assignment
Group case study assignmentGroup case study assignment
Group case study assignmentOlgaKovalchuk15
 
Zappos Case analysis
Zappos Case analysisZappos Case analysis
Zappos Case analysisAshish Tandon
 
Netflix International Business Strategy Plan
Netflix International Business Strategy PlanNetflix International Business Strategy Plan
Netflix International Business Strategy PlanIsabelle Smith
 
Launching Netflix in India
Launching Netflix in IndiaLaunching Netflix in India
Launching Netflix in IndiaKshitij Sheth
 
Netflix Business Model presentation
Netflix Business Model presentationNetflix Business Model presentation
Netflix Business Model presentationbhaveshgidwani1
 
Market Analysis on Netflix
Market Analysis on NetflixMarket Analysis on Netflix
Market Analysis on NetflixTapan Desai
 
Propecia section b_group3
Propecia section b_group3Propecia section b_group3
Propecia section b_group3Prateek Goel
 
Netflix - Presentation
Netflix - PresentationNetflix - Presentation
Netflix - Presentationtobiasb191
 
Netflix Case Presentation
Netflix Case PresentationNetflix Case Presentation
Netflix Case PresentationBrett Miller
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Barnes & Noble - marketing plan
Barnes & Noble - marketing plan Barnes & Noble - marketing plan
Barnes & Noble - marketing plan
 
Netflix: Case study (Indian Perception)
Netflix: Case study (Indian Perception)Netflix: Case study (Indian Perception)
Netflix: Case study (Indian Perception)
 
Netflix India - Campaign Planning - Powerpoint Presentation - 2017
Netflix India - Campaign Planning - Powerpoint Presentation - 2017Netflix India - Campaign Planning - Powerpoint Presentation - 2017
Netflix India - Campaign Planning - Powerpoint Presentation - 2017
 
Marketing Mix of Netflix
Marketing Mix of NetflixMarketing Mix of Netflix
Marketing Mix of Netflix
 
HBO
HBOHBO
HBO
 
Netflix Case Study
Netflix Case StudyNetflix Case Study
Netflix Case Study
 
Group case study assignment
Group case study assignmentGroup case study assignment
Group case study assignment
 
Zappos Case analysis
Zappos Case analysisZappos Case analysis
Zappos Case analysis
 
Netflix International Business Strategy Plan
Netflix International Business Strategy PlanNetflix International Business Strategy Plan
Netflix International Business Strategy Plan
 
Launching Netflix in India
Launching Netflix in IndiaLaunching Netflix in India
Launching Netflix in India
 
Netflix Case Study
Netflix Case StudyNetflix Case Study
Netflix Case Study
 
Best Buy
 Best Buy Best Buy
Best Buy
 
Netflix Business Model presentation
Netflix Business Model presentationNetflix Business Model presentation
Netflix Business Model presentation
 
Star bucks service marketing
Star bucks service marketingStar bucks service marketing
Star bucks service marketing
 
S.T. Dupont - A Case Study
S.T. Dupont - A Case StudyS.T. Dupont - A Case Study
S.T. Dupont - A Case Study
 
Market Analysis on Netflix
Market Analysis on NetflixMarket Analysis on Netflix
Market Analysis on Netflix
 
Propecia section b_group3
Propecia section b_group3Propecia section b_group3
Propecia section b_group3
 
Netflix - Presentation
Netflix - PresentationNetflix - Presentation
Netflix - Presentation
 
Netflix Case Presentation
Netflix Case PresentationNetflix Case Presentation
Netflix Case Presentation
 
Netflix
NetflixNetflix
Netflix
 

Andere mochten auch

NIBC 2016 - [Graduate] -[Team 45 Tsunami Capital] - PPT
NIBC 2016 - [Graduate] -[Team 45 Tsunami Capital] - PPTNIBC 2016 - [Graduate] -[Team 45 Tsunami Capital] - PPT
NIBC 2016 - [Graduate] -[Team 45 Tsunami Capital] - PPT(Aaron) shenzhi ju
 
Netflix vs HBO v3 (2 17-14)
Netflix vs HBO v3 (2 17-14)Netflix vs HBO v3 (2 17-14)
Netflix vs HBO v3 (2 17-14)Chris Van Noy
 
Game of thrones presentation
Game of thrones presentationGame of thrones presentation
Game of thrones presentationsafrankline
 
Startup Secrets - Getting Behind the Perfect Investor Pitch
Startup Secrets - Getting Behind the Perfect Investor PitchStartup Secrets - Getting Behind the Perfect Investor Pitch
Startup Secrets - Getting Behind the Perfect Investor PitchMichael Skok
 

Andere mochten auch (8)

HBO
HBOHBO
HBO
 
NIBC 2016 - [Graduate] -[Team 45 Tsunami Capital] - PPT
NIBC 2016 - [Graduate] -[Team 45 Tsunami Capital] - PPTNIBC 2016 - [Graduate] -[Team 45 Tsunami Capital] - PPT
NIBC 2016 - [Graduate] -[Team 45 Tsunami Capital] - PPT
 
HBO
HBOHBO
HBO
 
HBO
HBO HBO
HBO
 
Game of thrones Analysis
Game of thrones Analysis Game of thrones Analysis
Game of thrones Analysis
 
Netflix vs HBO v3 (2 17-14)
Netflix vs HBO v3 (2 17-14)Netflix vs HBO v3 (2 17-14)
Netflix vs HBO v3 (2 17-14)
 
Game of thrones presentation
Game of thrones presentationGame of thrones presentation
Game of thrones presentation
 
Startup Secrets - Getting Behind the Perfect Investor Pitch
Startup Secrets - Getting Behind the Perfect Investor PitchStartup Secrets - Getting Behind the Perfect Investor Pitch
Startup Secrets - Getting Behind the Perfect Investor Pitch
 

Ähnlich wie Valuation of HBO's Stand-Alone Enterprise and Equity Values

How the Digital Revolution is Disrupting the TV Industry
How the Digital Revolution is Disrupting the TV Industry How the Digital Revolution is Disrupting the TV Industry
How the Digital Revolution is Disrupting the TV Industry Suman Mishra
 
Running head WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1 1WEEK 3 ASSIGMENT 17We.docx
Running head WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1 1WEEK 3 ASSIGMENT 17We.docxRunning head WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1 1WEEK 3 ASSIGMENT 17We.docx
Running head WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1 1WEEK 3 ASSIGMENT 17We.docxrtodd599
 
Microeconomics presentation- Full Sail
Microeconomics presentation- Full SailMicroeconomics presentation- Full Sail
Microeconomics presentation- Full SailEstherlinLopez
 
Streaming| Video Movies TV Shows| June 2019
Streaming| Video Movies TV Shows| June 2019Streaming| Video Movies TV Shows| June 2019
Streaming| Video Movies TV Shows| June 2019paul young cpa, cga
 
Google - Youtube strategy - dynamic pricing opportunity
Google - Youtube strategy - dynamic pricing opportunityGoogle - Youtube strategy - dynamic pricing opportunity
Google - Youtube strategy - dynamic pricing opportunityMuneet Bhatia, B.Eng., MBA
 
How Much Does OTT Platform Development Cost
How Much Does OTT Platform Development CostHow Much Does OTT Platform Development Cost
How Much Does OTT Platform Development CostSuganya Mathivanan
 
NETFLIX Business Analysis & Valuation
NETFLIX Business Analysis & ValuationNETFLIX Business Analysis & Valuation
NETFLIX Business Analysis & ValuationAlegra N Horne
 
Bowen daigledionvalentine netflixcasestudy
Bowen daigledionvalentine netflixcasestudyBowen daigledionvalentine netflixcasestudy
Bowen daigledionvalentine netflixcasestudyWanda Alexander
 
2019 Outlook - Streaming (Video and Music) - May 2019
2019 Outlook - Streaming (Video and Music) - May 20192019 Outlook - Streaming (Video and Music) - May 2019
2019 Outlook - Streaming (Video and Music) - May 2019paul young cpa, cga
 
Chap 7 - The Biz of Broadcasting, Cable and New Media.pptx
Chap 7 - The Biz of Broadcasting, Cable and New Media.pptxChap 7 - The Biz of Broadcasting, Cable and New Media.pptx
Chap 7 - The Biz of Broadcasting, Cable and New Media.pptxzulaikha zubir
 
TV Streaming| Android Technology| February 2019
TV Streaming| Android Technology| February 2019TV Streaming| Android Technology| February 2019
TV Streaming| Android Technology| February 2019paul young cpa, cga
 
Streaming Services| Entertainment| TV Series, Sports, Movies, Documentaries a...
Streaming Services| Entertainment| TV Series, Sports, Movies, Documentaries a...Streaming Services| Entertainment| TV Series, Sports, Movies, Documentaries a...
Streaming Services| Entertainment| TV Series, Sports, Movies, Documentaries a...paul young cpa, cga
 
Streaming Services| Entertainment| Cutting the Cable continues to Grow| April...
Streaming Services| Entertainment| Cutting the Cable continues to Grow| April...Streaming Services| Entertainment| Cutting the Cable continues to Grow| April...
Streaming Services| Entertainment| Cutting the Cable continues to Grow| April...paul young cpa, cga
 

Ähnlich wie Valuation of HBO's Stand-Alone Enterprise and Equity Values (20)

Musings_CLSARoadshows
Musings_CLSARoadshowsMusings_CLSARoadshows
Musings_CLSARoadshows
 
junior- netflix
junior- netflixjunior- netflix
junior- netflix
 
How the Digital Revolution is Disrupting the TV Industry
How the Digital Revolution is Disrupting the TV Industry How the Digital Revolution is Disrupting the TV Industry
How the Digital Revolution is Disrupting the TV Industry
 
Running head WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1 1WEEK 3 ASSIGMENT 17We.docx
Running head WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1 1WEEK 3 ASSIGMENT 17We.docxRunning head WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1 1WEEK 3 ASSIGMENT 17We.docx
Running head WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1 1WEEK 3 ASSIGMENT 17We.docx
 
Task 6
Task 6Task 6
Task 6
 
ia_white_paper
ia_white_paperia_white_paper
ia_white_paper
 
Microeconomics presentation- Full Sail
Microeconomics presentation- Full SailMicroeconomics presentation- Full Sail
Microeconomics presentation- Full Sail
 
Streaming| Video Movies TV Shows| June 2019
Streaming| Video Movies TV Shows| June 2019Streaming| Video Movies TV Shows| June 2019
Streaming| Video Movies TV Shows| June 2019
 
Google - Youtube strategy - dynamic pricing opportunity
Google - Youtube strategy - dynamic pricing opportunityGoogle - Youtube strategy - dynamic pricing opportunity
Google - Youtube strategy - dynamic pricing opportunity
 
How Much Does OTT Platform Development Cost
How Much Does OTT Platform Development CostHow Much Does OTT Platform Development Cost
How Much Does OTT Platform Development Cost
 
NETFLIX Business Analysis & Valuation
NETFLIX Business Analysis & ValuationNETFLIX Business Analysis & Valuation
NETFLIX Business Analysis & Valuation
 
Bowen daigledionvalentine netflixcasestudy
Bowen daigledionvalentine netflixcasestudyBowen daigledionvalentine netflixcasestudy
Bowen daigledionvalentine netflixcasestudy
 
Task 6
Task 6Task 6
Task 6
 
2019 Outlook - Streaming (Video and Music) - May 2019
2019 Outlook - Streaming (Video and Music) - May 20192019 Outlook - Streaming (Video and Music) - May 2019
2019 Outlook - Streaming (Video and Music) - May 2019
 
TV Everywhere
TV EverywhereTV Everywhere
TV Everywhere
 
Chap 7 - The Biz of Broadcasting, Cable and New Media.pptx
Chap 7 - The Biz of Broadcasting, Cable and New Media.pptxChap 7 - The Biz of Broadcasting, Cable and New Media.pptx
Chap 7 - The Biz of Broadcasting, Cable and New Media.pptx
 
TV Streaming| Android Technology| February 2019
TV Streaming| Android Technology| February 2019TV Streaming| Android Technology| February 2019
TV Streaming| Android Technology| February 2019
 
Streaming Services| Entertainment| TV Series, Sports, Movies, Documentaries a...
Streaming Services| Entertainment| TV Series, Sports, Movies, Documentaries a...Streaming Services| Entertainment| TV Series, Sports, Movies, Documentaries a...
Streaming Services| Entertainment| TV Series, Sports, Movies, Documentaries a...
 
Streaming Services| Entertainment| Cutting the Cable continues to Grow| April...
Streaming Services| Entertainment| Cutting the Cable continues to Grow| April...Streaming Services| Entertainment| Cutting the Cable continues to Grow| April...
Streaming Services| Entertainment| Cutting the Cable continues to Grow| April...
 
TV-Whitepaper
TV-WhitepaperTV-Whitepaper
TV-Whitepaper
 

Valuation of HBO's Stand-Alone Enterprise and Equity Values

  • 1. MEMORANDUM TO: Mark Mondello and Arya Rahimian (Duff and Phelps) Prof. Steve Moyer and Prof. Julia Plotts (USC Marshall) FROM: Team One (Tingting Liu, Brian Wang, Claire Wu, and Dongyu Yu) DATE: December 10, 2014 RE: Stand-Alone Value of HBO Our team has been requested to perform valuation analysis on the stand- alone value of HBO, a subsidiary company of Time Warner Cable, Inc. As a rapidly growing company while seeking further business expansions, online video streaming, for example, in a relatively competitive media and entertainment industry. Our task was therefore to reasonably and professionally value the enterprise as well as equity values of HBO, using industry research insights, financial knowledge, and various valuation techniques. We started with conducting extensive research on the industries, trends, HBO company profiles, etc., followed by performing valuation analysis using discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, comparable companies analysis, and precedent transactions analysis. After careful and detailed deliberation, we are concluding the following result for HBO valuations (in millions dollars): Enterprise Value: $32189.0 - $38630.5 Equity Value: $22797.8 - $29239.3 In the following sections, we will explain in detail the methods used, analysis, and rationales for concluding in such valuations. I. Company and Industry Overview HBO (Home Box Office) is a premium television cable and satellite station, headquartered in New York, USA. Started in 1972, it streams movies, exclusive television shows, music, documentaries, sports, and various other entertainment programs. After 42 years of development, HBO, along with its sister channel Cinemax, is encompassing almost 90% of US paid television stations market. Some of well-known and popular HBO productions include Sex and the City, Game of Thrones, Girls, The Newsroom, etc.
  • 2. HBO is also a premium cable and satellite television network worldwide. Owned by Home Box Office Inc., a private operating subsidiary of Time Warner Cable, HBO generated $1.8 billion in operating profit last year, which is as much as one quarter of the total profit of Time Warner Cable. A. Business Model HBO operates on a unique business model that it created 42 years ago: It provides non stop streaming high-quality, and some unique entertainment television programs 24/7 for paid subscribers of its 13 channels. Unlike the majority of US broadcasting and cable television stations, HBO does not have advertisement placement, which accounts for a huge part of profits for its peers. The main driver for its income has always been the number of subscribers, which generates about 80% of HBO’s income. The cost of this programming varies from $15-$20 per month depending on which major cable provider the customer uses. The subscription fee is high compared to other cable stations; however, HBO, using high-quality and exclusivity as selling points for its products and operating under TTS (total subscriber satisfaction), profits more than the total of ABC, NBC, CBS, and FOX. In addition, most companies will offer discounts or even free HBO for 6-12 months. Next year, HBO is finally planning to start offering stand-alone, online-only subscription plans, seeking another expansion of its business. B. Porter’s Five Forces Model l Buyer Power In the media and entertainment industry, the bargaining power of buyers (consumers) is high. This bargaining power is due in part to the economy in that if low cost alternatives are available, more families are likely to choose them. The availability of substitutes increases the bargaining power of consumers, as the ultimate purchaser of entertainment products and services increase. Consumers have a very wide selection of programming to choose from and ease of access through increased online programming and sources of entertainment. Increased globalization also adds to the bargaining power of the consumer. l Supplier Power The bargaining power of suppliers varies by supplier type in the media and
  • 3. entertainment industry. The value chain of many of the production companies is primarily handled in-house, but more companies are outsourcing to cut costs in order to keep, or attain, a competitive advantage. This strategy especially lowers the bargaining power of American suppliers since suppliers overseas will provide the same services for a fraction of the cost, with varying degrees of quality. The industry has also seen an increase in the number of suppliers as a result of increased outsourcing, which also results in lower bargaining power of supplies as competition at their level increases. As a result of this new decrease in draw, individual companies have attempted to secure high-profile stars through multi-year or multi-show contracts, and as a result reduce their future bargaining power. l The Threat of the New Entrant The threat of new entrants into any industry depends on the strength of the barriers to entry, and the resulting response of existing competitors. The threat of new entrants to the media and entertainment industry is relatively low. This industry is seen to have established companies and conglomerates with significant presence in media networks and television productions, thus creating a significant barrier to entry. The threat of new entrants is so low, in fact, that industry insiders are concerned that new, independent producers are prevented from having their voices heard and getting their new, innovative products into the market. The evolution of Internet distribution channels is making this less of a concern with its accessibility and immense distribution opportunities. The high, ongoing financial outlay needed for movie production, or television series production is also extremely high. For example, production costs for Disney’s Pirates of the Caribbean movie hit nearly $300 million. High sunk costs and capital requirements are also heavy entry barriers. l The Threat of Substitute Product The most detrimental impact on a corporation happens when there is a high threat of substitute products or services that is both likely and probable. One of the major threats of substitution for the media and entertainment industry is facing the innovation in other industries. According to the PWC M&A activities report for 2010, “technology giants such as Google Inc. and Apple Inc. plan to continue to increase their pressure on the entertainment and
  • 4. media industry by driving convergence.” Both Apple and Google have become pioneers and market leaders in video distribution. Netflix, in particular, has become a popular alternative to the expensive costs of paid televisions resulting in some revenue loss for the entertainment industry. l The Rivalry among the Existing Firms in the Industry All sectors of the media and entertainment industry face daunting challenges from alternative delivery methods, which has increased the competition among entertainment delivery platforms. Telecommunications companies such as AT&T and Verizon are now delivering television programming to the home via ultra high-speed Internet connections battling cable and satellite TV firms for market share. Tough economic times often results in a dog-eat-dog business environment but the opposite can also seen in the industry. A strategy being implemented across the industry is one of collaboration in order to gain a larger market share and competitive advantage against other industry leaders and collaborators. The goal of industry leaders is to be the leading pioneer in digital entertainment and create entry barriers for new entrants once growth becomes more obvious. C. Current Market Position For more than a decade, HBO has lavished good, smart product to its viewers, and in the process of raising the entire industry's creative game. In the late 1990s, HBO pioneered an intelligent, patient style of storytelling that gloried in loose ends and morally ambiguous characters a style. To keep relevant to television audiences, cable channel operators have started spending huge amounts of money to create hit shows and programming. Time Warner operates a few leading channels and says that Home Box Place of work, or HBO for limited, is "majority of the nation’s widely distributed multi-channel quality pay for television service.” Furthermore, it competes on an overseas scale and boasts 93 trillion worldwide subscribers, according to its owner. The company is also taking steps to make its current competitive position strong by focusing on its international strategy and strategic alliances. This major subsidiary of Time Warner Incorporation had signed a deal with
  • 5. Tencent Holdings Ltd. Through this deal HBO would distribute movies and TV dramas through the giant online video site on the Chinese internet. In this way, the US cable network would be expanded in the Chinese market. This would allow HBO to take the advantage of the massive online user base in China. HBO could also create an official distribution channel in a market where the pirated videos are very much common and rampant. Apart from this, another issue related to this matter is HBO’s new online streaming serve, which would be basically add-on services on to the broadband packages with the cable operators and through other technology partners such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Apple Incorporation. Clearly a business expansion plan and part of a strategy to deal of key competitors such as Netflix and Hulu, the online streaming service will probably be a great hit concerning the current trend. II. Benchmarking Analysis Due to the lack of publicly available data for privately owned companies, we selected seven publicly traded companies that operate in the same industry as the benchmarks to help determine the value of HBO. We compared figures such as stock price, P/E, Return on Equity, Enterprise Value and Free Cash Flow Yield, and narrowed down the comparable companies to four, which included Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc., CBS Corporation, DIRECTV, and Netflix, Inc. Moreover, considering the fact that HBO is a private company, we relevered the beta for HBO based on the on the beta and D/E ratio we found from these publicly traded companies. III. Discounted Cash Flow Analysis A. Key Assumptions As a private company with limited access to its detailed financial statements, some historical data from Time Warner’s 2013 financial statements was used in estimating HBO’s key financials. As shown in Exhibit 1, current assets, current liabilities, total debt, and cash flow used in investing activities were all assumed based on average figure among 4 segments of the parent company. In addition, several other key assumptions were made based on HBO’s historical performance and growth potential, potential online streaming expansion, and global partnerships. Subscriber growth rate was assumed to grow at a constant rate of 0.2% considering its business expansion, as well
  • 6. as the fact that HBO had seen the largest increase in subscriptions last year. Therefore, we assumed the rate would increase. Also, cost of revenue % of sales was seeing a continuous decrease shown in historical data in Exhibit 2, we thus assumed that there would be a constant rate of decrease at 2% in cost of revenue percentage. Lastly, according to Ibbotson chart, we assumed a 0.8% size premium as categorized 1⁄4 of Time Warner a large cap. Perpetuity growth rate was an assumption between 2-3% inflation rate and a 4-5% GDP growth. Besides, Beta was calculated from benchmarking analysis (Exhibit 6), and exit multiple was assumed based on multiple range average determined in comparable companies analysis (Exhibit 7). B. Financial Statement Projections Based on the HBO data that we found on Timer Warner Financial Statement, we were able to project revenue of HBO at first. We calculated the growth rate of number of subscribers from 2011 to 2013. We used the 2012-2013 growth rate as the base for projections, as the 2012 ratio of over 30% was a bit abnormal probably due to new hit shows, such as Game of Thrones and Girls on 2011. The growth rates in the projection period were thus calculated, assuming the 0.2% increase every year. We then calculated the subscribers as percentage of sales of 2012, 2013 for 2.5%, 2.6%. We projected this figure in the projected period as the average 2.55%. The projected revenue is calculated by dividing the projected subscribers by the subscribers as percentage of sales. Critical value such as net SG&A, depreciation & amortization, capital expenditures, etc. based on percentage of revenues. We assumed 38% as the tax rate to calculate tax expense. Then we concluded key financials such as EBIT and Net Income. With the lack of financial information of HBO, we projected the cash flow from investing activities by dividing Time Warner’s total cash flow from investing by 4 (HBO is one of the four segments of Time Warner). Thus, after concluding three statement projections, we were able to get the net change of working capital to proceed in the free cash flow calculation. For one time adjustment, we also included a 1 billion dollar under “other income” as Tencent announced a deal with HBO this year.
  • 7. The detail is presented in Exhibit 2. C. Estimating Enterprise and Equity Value First, we calculated free cash flow based on the formula. After discounting the sum into present value, we used both Exit Multiple Method (EMM) and Perpetuity Growth Method (PGM) for calculating the terminal value. In the process, we calculated WACC using some data given, and assumptions such as 38% effective tax rate, and 0.8% Size Premium. We finally determined a WACC of 8.5%. As for Perpetuity Growth Rate, we determined the growth rate as 3.5% as explained earlier. After adding the PV of free cash flow and PV of terminal value, we came to the enterprise values yielded by both methods. Using Exit Multiple Method (EMM) and PGM, we were able to estimate HBO’s equity value as $22,797.8 - $29,239.3 million and enterprise value as $32,189.0 - $38,630.5 million shown in Exhibit 3.   D. Sensitivity Analysis Then we performed a sensitivity analysis, adjusting variables such as exit multiple, perpetuity growth rate, and WACC to test the change of enterprise value and equity value as results. The detail is shown in Exhibit 4. E. Scenario Analysis To more accurately forecasting the valuation considering variabilities of several key drivers, we performed scenario analysis. We determined that our assumptions of the increase of subscribers’ growth, cost of revenue decrease, as well as tax rate were all highly subject to change. Therefore, based on the current case, we created best, moderate, and worst scenarios changing values of the three key drivers to come up with valuation of target under different circumstances. The result is shown in Exhibit 5. IV. Comparable Companies Analysis To come up with a list of comparable companies with HBO, we selected four companies for their similarity in market position and company profiles with HBO. To calculate multiples such as EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, EV/Revenue, P/B and P/E ratio for all of the comparable companies, we retrieved data such as EBITDA, EBIT, and Enterprise Value from Capital IQ. We concluded our valuation of HBO’s enterprise value and equity value based on multiple range estimated by the mean and median of the comparable companies, we decided to exclude Netflix’s value as a result of
  • 8. abnormal multiples. As we found out, in substance, Netflix is an Internet & Computer Company which has much less cost than a Broadcasting & Cable Company. Therefore Netflix has better operating leverage. Our estimation was equity value range of being $ 10,775.5 - $23,881.6 and enterprise value range being $20,166.7 - $33,272.8. The detailed comparable companies analysis is shown in Exhibit 7. V. Precedent Transactions Analysis To create a list of precedent transaction companies, we used transaction screening on Capital IQ. Narrowing down the list based on criteria such as industries (TV Broadcasting Stations, Television Production Companies, Video Production Companies), US geographical location, private target, mergers & acquisition transaction type, etc., we generated a list of precedent transactions in the past 5 years. We then further screened the results for available and reasonable financial multiples. With limited information provided for private transactions, we tried to create a list of comparable precedent transactions, focusing in TV Broadcasting industry (with one in TV Production), as it is the sector that generates most revenue to HBO. This method yielded an equity value range of $10755.4 - $22536.1 and an enterprise value range of $17690.0 - $32927.3. The result of precedent transaction analysis is shown in Exhibit 8. IV. Valuation Conclusions Analyzing the results yielded by all three valuation methods, we decided to conclude our final valuation based solely on DCF result. One obvious rationale was that both comparable companies analysis and precedent transactions analyses were based on publicly traded companies, which apparently differentiates largely from HBO. In addition, HBO’s unique business model of operating both cable satellite service and the potential online streaming service separates it from peers, adding the difficulties of accurate comparable and precedent valuations. The results yielded by this two methods also proved to be moderately off from the DCF results, due to the difficulties of finding similar companies or transactions. Overall, the DCF valuation result was reasonable considering the fact that the performance of HBO in 2014 was outstanding. HBO had achieved $ 1.8 billion in operating profits over the last year which is equal to about one- quarter of the Time Warner’s$ 4.9 billion of its annual revenues. Also, the market and investors are looking at HBO as a profitable and rapidly growing
  • 9. target with is active business strategy and expansion plan. The impact of cash flows for future forecasting for HBO stand-alone 2015 program is positive and it generates positive cash flows during five year forecasting. The net present values for five year forecasting was positive and this indicated a healthy enterprise value. HBO therefore should definitely proceed its planning for standalone streaming in 2015 because they have a positive net present value and also they can made some solid strategy regarding financing other project in the future. HBO can expand their projects in the future as well where they can earn more profits and get their position according to their mission and vision. Maximizing Current Valuation Since the subscribers growth is stagnating in United States of America, the pay television market was shook up by HBO in an announcement that in the year 2015 under which the customers would be able to access HBO without paying any pay television subscription. The new price of the HBO will be influenced by many factors. First of all, the initial target of HBO being 10 million broadband customers will probably contribute to more sales growth. Secondly, HBO competes with Netflix, not on the basis of price but content, providing a more stable and promising future. Thirdly, HBO is not very likely to have too big of a downfall which affects its current profits. To further maximize its valuation, the company should spend more efforts on its promotional activities to keep its incumbent subscribers. Apart from this, HBO should take steps to expand in the international markets. The company is examining its options to expand the tactics of the company for programming distribution such as the cooperation this year with Tencent. The news was published in the Wall Street Journal, in which it was stated that it was looking forward to launch Netflix-like services in those countries that had broadband infrastructure. Some of the choices for HBO to expand are Japan and Turkey based on its market position. HBO needs to think over its international expansion strategy before the saturation mark is reached.      
  • 10. Exhibit  1:  Key  Assumptions   Exhibit  2:  Financial  Statements  Projections  
  • 11. Exhibit  3:  Discounted  Cash  Flow  Analysis  
  • 12. Exhibit  4:  Sensitivity  Analysis  
  • 13. Exhibit  5:  Scenario  Analysis   Exhibit  6:  Benchmarking  Analysis  
  • 14. Exhibit  7:  Comparable  Companies  Analysis   Exhibit  8:  Precedent  Transactions  Analysis