SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 38
Metaphysics of God
Berkeley, Aquinas and more...
We have devoted time to considering… what is real?
Are our perceptions accurate? Do they reflect
reality? We’ve also pondered what it is to be
human? Is human consciousness real? Is it special?
Is it good?
Let’s push these metaphysical questions one step
further - Can humans perceive God? Is there a
higher power? Can we prove that God does not
exist? Can we prove that God does exist?
Quotes
“I believe in God, only I spell it Nature.” - Frank Lloyd Wright, 1867-1939
“You must abandon your reason, know nothing of it, annihilate it
completely, or you will never enter heaven.” Martin Luther, 1483 - 1546
“ A religion that declares war on reason will not in the long run be able to
hold out against it.” Immanual Kant, 1724 - 1804
“The religious geniuses of all ages have been distinguished by a kind of
religious feeling, which knows no dogma.” Albert Einstien, 1879-1955
How do our beliefs (or lack of a belief) in God affect
our understanding of:
● Science
● History
● Arts
● Ethics
● Each other?
Philosophy... on the Anthropomorphic God
Be wary of the danger of anthropomorphism.
Why must God be in the form of a (white) (old) man?
Instead of God creating man in his image, maybe we should think
and talk about it as the other way around:
Man creating God in his own image (and that we continue to
project human qualities onto God)
The Paradoxes of the God of the Philosophers
If we use a neutral, abstract notion of God, we run into some difficult
paradoxes.
1. The paradox of omnipotence - How could God create a being that he
subsequently could not control?
2. The paradox of change - how can a God who is perfect intervene in
human history to change things…. If he comes down from on high and
enters the human realm he immediately loses his perfect status.
3. The paradox of suffering - if God is all-loving and god is all-powerful why
can he not prevent profound suffering?
4. The paradox of free-will - if God is all-knowing, then he knows the past,
present and the FUTURE. This would make human free will impossible.
How do Humans believe in God?
What arguments do those of faith use?
Arguments FOR God
Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274)
Aquinas - 5 Proofs of God
The Argument from Religious Experience
- A miracle happens!
- A vision happens!
- You survive a plane crash!
- Something you read in a religious text reflects something you see in real life
And, then, you believe…
Hume’s (Scottish philosopher) argument against this: it is never rational to believe
in miracles because the weight of evidence will always be against them.
Modern critique: Psychology - human need to believe… loaded.
The Argument from Design
- The order and and harmony of the universe could not have come about by
chance.
- Scientists of faith point to the exquisite design of eyes, the universe, etc…
Hume’s critique: most you can prove is an architect god, not a design god. And
the world is not necessarily perfect.
Modern critique: Science/Evolution
The Cosmological Argument
● Not based on the order of
the universe but on the fact
that it exists at all.
● There must be an
explanation.
● What caused the Big Bang?
● God?
● A feeling“There must be
something.”
George Berkeley’s A Treatise Concerning the
Principles of Human Knowledge (1710) presents
a form of Metaphysical Idealism which asserts
that there are two kinds of reality, idea and spirit.
Ideas are real because they can be perceived.
Spirit is real because it can have ideas, and because it can
perceive them.
Berkeley argues that ideas are derived from physical and mental perceptions,
from memory, and from imagination. The existence of an idea depends on its
being able to be perceived. An idea does not exist unless it is perceived.
According to Berkeley, "esse est percipi" ("to be is to be
perceived"). The existence of an idea cannot be separated
from its being perceived. If an idea or object is not perceived,
then it does not exist.
The perceiving, active being is referred to by Berkeley as the
mind, spirit, soul, or self. The existence of a mind or spirit
consists of the ability to have ideas and to perceive them.
Spirit, as it perceives ideas, is called the understanding.
Spirit, as it produces ideas, or as it mentally operates on
them, is called the will.
Berkeley argues that there is no substance other than spirit.
Substance is not material, but spiritual.
Matter neither perceives, nor is perceived. Therefore, matter does not
exist. What we describe as matter is only the idea derived from the
sensory perception of solidity, extension, form, motion, or other
physical properties of an object.
But the object only exists if it can perceive or is perceived, and
therefore its existence is ideal or spiritual.
Berkeley also argues that abstract ideas do not exist. General ideas of qualities
may exist, but these general ideas are only representations of particular ideas.
According to Berkeley, existence consists of the state of actively perceiving or of
passively being perceived. If something is not able to perceive or is not able to be
perceived, then it does not exist. Everything that can perceive, or that can be
perceived, exists. Everything that exists can either perceive or can be perceived.
Berkeley explains that spirit is not itself an idea but that it perceives and produces
ideas. Spirit is not itself perceived, but the ideas or effects produced by spirit are
perceived. Thus, in order for an idea to exist, there must be a mind or spirit
capable of producing or perceiving it. Nothing can exist without a perceiving mind
or spirit.
Berkeley also explains that spirit is not known by sensory
perception, but that its existence can be known by mental
perception. Perceiving beings can perceive the presence of
each other.
Berkeley argues that the existence of God can be perceived
by human beings. The spirit of human beings is finite, but the
spirit of God is infinite.
Berkeley also argues that our own existence as perceiving
beings depends on God. He maintains that everything that
exists is perceived in the mind of God.
Berkeley contends that in order for anything to exist, it must
be capable of being perceived. He argues that this does not
make the world less real.
Indeed, he contends that our ideas of the world are real, but
that the world cannot be proved to have an external reality,
and that if we approach the world in this way, then we may be
able to define valid principles of human knowledge.
So what does all that have to do with God?
GOD exists, therefore, in order to sense us
humans. If God did not perceive us, then we
would not exist.
Arguments AGAINST God
Problem of Evil
Louise Antony’s Arguments Against God
- Doesn’t believe in God like she doesn’t believe in
ghosts or magic. Denies all supernaturalism.
- Just because we cannot know everything is not a reasonable justification for
belief in God.
- (A lot of religion built on the insufficiency of human cognition.)
- So much disagreement across religions.
- The argument from evil is most persuasive.
- If a benevolent God made the universe then it would be much more good in the
world. It makes more sense that it is random “product of mindless natural laws.”
- Religious experiences are about humans having human experiences
- You can’t just say, “that’s my belief, and that’s that.”
L.A.: Well, I do wonder about that. Why do theists care
so much about belief in God? Disagreement over that
question is really no more than a difference in
philosophical opinion. Specifically, it’s just a
disagreement about ontology — about what kinds of
things exist. Why should a disagreement like that bear
any moral significance? Why shouldn’t theists just look
for allies among us atheists in the battles that matter
— the ones concerned with justice, civil rights, peace,
etc. — and forget about our differences with respect to
such arcane matters as the origins of the universe?
How do our beliefs (or lack of a belief) in God affect
our understanding of:
● Science
● History
● Arts
● Ethics
● Each other?

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Religious experience
Religious experience Religious experience
Religious experience philipapeters
 
PHIL 101 - Lecture 18
PHIL 101 - Lecture 18PHIL 101 - Lecture 18
PHIL 101 - Lecture 18chewieblue
 
Religious experience
Religious experience Religious experience
Religious experience philipapeters
 
presentation of historical context of psychology
presentation of historical context of psychologypresentation of historical context of psychology
presentation of historical context of psychologyGamze Farz
 
Dualism - the relationship between mind and body
Dualism - the relationship between mind and body Dualism - the relationship between mind and body
Dualism - the relationship between mind and body thishmr
 
Ch3ppt velasquez12
Ch3ppt velasquez12Ch3ppt velasquez12
Ch3ppt velasquez12dborcoman
 
Rational Theology of Judaism - Introduction
Rational Theology of Judaism - IntroductionRational Theology of Judaism - Introduction
Rational Theology of Judaism - Introductionhellaschapiro
 
Bishop george berkeley
Bishop george berkeleyBishop george berkeley
Bishop george berkeleyRichard Lopez
 
Body or Soul? Philosophy
Body or Soul? PhilosophyBody or Soul? Philosophy
Body or Soul? PhilosophyClare Dempsey
 
Ch5ppt velasquez12
Ch5ppt velasquez12Ch5ppt velasquez12
Ch5ppt velasquez12dborcoman
 
philosophy religion
philosophy religion philosophy religion
philosophy religion Manisha Raika
 
The philosophical constructs of the human being
The philosophical constructs of the human beingThe philosophical constructs of the human being
The philosophical constructs of the human beingNikka Abenion
 
04 man as embodiment
04   man as embodiment04   man as embodiment
04 man as embodimentPeter Miles
 
Empiricism and Rationalism
Empiricism and RationalismEmpiricism and Rationalism
Empiricism and RationalismCDAGCUF
 

Was ist angesagt? (19)

Religious experience
Religious experience Religious experience
Religious experience
 
Religious experiences
Religious experiencesReligious experiences
Religious experiences
 
Dualism
DualismDualism
Dualism
 
Mind Body
Mind BodyMind Body
Mind Body
 
PHIL 101 - Lecture 18
PHIL 101 - Lecture 18PHIL 101 - Lecture 18
PHIL 101 - Lecture 18
 
02 religion
02 religion02 religion
02 religion
 
Religious experience
Religious experience Religious experience
Religious experience
 
presentation of historical context of psychology
presentation of historical context of psychologypresentation of historical context of psychology
presentation of historical context of psychology
 
Dualism - the relationship between mind and body
Dualism - the relationship between mind and body Dualism - the relationship between mind and body
Dualism - the relationship between mind and body
 
Ch3ppt velasquez12
Ch3ppt velasquez12Ch3ppt velasquez12
Ch3ppt velasquez12
 
Rational Theology of Judaism - Introduction
Rational Theology of Judaism - IntroductionRational Theology of Judaism - Introduction
Rational Theology of Judaism - Introduction
 
Bishop george berkeley
Bishop george berkeleyBishop george berkeley
Bishop george berkeley
 
Body or Soul? Philosophy
Body or Soul? PhilosophyBody or Soul? Philosophy
Body or Soul? Philosophy
 
Ch5ppt velasquez12
Ch5ppt velasquez12Ch5ppt velasquez12
Ch5ppt velasquez12
 
philosophy religion
philosophy religion philosophy religion
philosophy religion
 
The philosophical constructs of the human being
The philosophical constructs of the human beingThe philosophical constructs of the human being
The philosophical constructs of the human being
 
04 man as embodiment
04   man as embodiment04   man as embodiment
04 man as embodiment
 
Empiricism and Rationalism
Empiricism and RationalismEmpiricism and Rationalism
Empiricism and Rationalism
 
Mind Body Problem
Mind Body ProblemMind Body Problem
Mind Body Problem
 

Ähnlich wie Metaphysics of god

Ähnlich wie Metaphysics of god (20)

Philosophy of religion synthesis
Philosophy of religion synthesisPhilosophy of religion synthesis
Philosophy of religion synthesis
 
Philo106 final paper
Philo106 final paperPhilo106 final paper
Philo106 final paper
 
06 knowledge
06 knowledge06 knowledge
06 knowledge
 
Does God really Exists?
Does God really Exists?Does God really Exists?
Does God really Exists?
 
CHAPTER 4The Nature of Substance, Reality, and Mind Idealism,.docx
CHAPTER 4The Nature of Substance, Reality, and Mind Idealism,.docxCHAPTER 4The Nature of Substance, Reality, and Mind Idealism,.docx
CHAPTER 4The Nature of Substance, Reality, and Mind Idealism,.docx
 
Philosophy lecture 07
Philosophy lecture 07Philosophy lecture 07
Philosophy lecture 07
 
Monism-and-Dualism.pptx
Monism-and-Dualism.pptxMonism-and-Dualism.pptx
Monism-and-Dualism.pptx
 
Atheism
AtheismAtheism
Atheism
 
In Search Of God
In Search Of GodIn Search Of God
In Search Of God
 
Understanding The Self
Understanding The SelfUnderstanding The Self
Understanding The Self
 
PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES (2).pptx
PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES (2).pptxPHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES (2).pptx
PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES (2).pptx
 
Essays on god and freud
Essays on god and freudEssays on god and freud
Essays on god and freud
 
Topic 9 existence of god
Topic 9 existence of godTopic 9 existence of god
Topic 9 existence of god
 
Proof of the Existence of a Creator
Proof of the Existence of a CreatorProof of the Existence of a Creator
Proof of the Existence of a Creator
 
God Exists Essay
God Exists EssayGod Exists Essay
God Exists Essay
 
IDEALISM_PPT.ppt
IDEALISM_PPT.pptIDEALISM_PPT.ppt
IDEALISM_PPT.ppt
 
IDEALISM_PPT.ppt
IDEALISM_PPT.pptIDEALISM_PPT.ppt
IDEALISM_PPT.ppt
 
Topic 9 existence of god
Topic 9 existence of godTopic 9 existence of god
Topic 9 existence of god
 
Science & Religion: Conflict or Conversation?
Science & Religion: Conflict or Conversation?Science & Religion: Conflict or Conversation?
Science & Religion: Conflict or Conversation?
 
Neurobiology of the Soul
Neurobiology of the SoulNeurobiology of the Soul
Neurobiology of the Soul
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...fonyou31
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfciinovamais
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfAyushMahapatra5
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfAdmir Softic
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAssociation for Project Management
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3JemimahLaneBuaron
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationnomboosow
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactPECB
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024Janet Corral
 
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writingfourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writingTeacherCyreneCayanan
 
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajansocial pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajanpragatimahajan3
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
 
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writingfourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
 
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajansocial pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
 

Metaphysics of god

  • 1. Metaphysics of God Berkeley, Aquinas and more...
  • 2. We have devoted time to considering… what is real? Are our perceptions accurate? Do they reflect reality? We’ve also pondered what it is to be human? Is human consciousness real? Is it special? Is it good? Let’s push these metaphysical questions one step further - Can humans perceive God? Is there a higher power? Can we prove that God does not exist? Can we prove that God does exist?
  • 3. Quotes “I believe in God, only I spell it Nature.” - Frank Lloyd Wright, 1867-1939 “You must abandon your reason, know nothing of it, annihilate it completely, or you will never enter heaven.” Martin Luther, 1483 - 1546 “ A religion that declares war on reason will not in the long run be able to hold out against it.” Immanual Kant, 1724 - 1804 “The religious geniuses of all ages have been distinguished by a kind of religious feeling, which knows no dogma.” Albert Einstien, 1879-1955
  • 4. How do our beliefs (or lack of a belief) in God affect our understanding of: ● Science ● History ● Arts ● Ethics ● Each other?
  • 5. Philosophy... on the Anthropomorphic God Be wary of the danger of anthropomorphism. Why must God be in the form of a (white) (old) man? Instead of God creating man in his image, maybe we should think and talk about it as the other way around: Man creating God in his own image (and that we continue to project human qualities onto God)
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8. The Paradoxes of the God of the Philosophers If we use a neutral, abstract notion of God, we run into some difficult paradoxes. 1. The paradox of omnipotence - How could God create a being that he subsequently could not control? 2. The paradox of change - how can a God who is perfect intervene in human history to change things…. If he comes down from on high and enters the human realm he immediately loses his perfect status. 3. The paradox of suffering - if God is all-loving and god is all-powerful why can he not prevent profound suffering? 4. The paradox of free-will - if God is all-knowing, then he knows the past, present and the FUTURE. This would make human free will impossible.
  • 9. How do Humans believe in God? What arguments do those of faith use?
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 16. Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274)
  • 17. Aquinas - 5 Proofs of God
  • 18. The Argument from Religious Experience - A miracle happens! - A vision happens! - You survive a plane crash! - Something you read in a religious text reflects something you see in real life And, then, you believe… Hume’s (Scottish philosopher) argument against this: it is never rational to believe in miracles because the weight of evidence will always be against them. Modern critique: Psychology - human need to believe… loaded.
  • 19. The Argument from Design - The order and and harmony of the universe could not have come about by chance. - Scientists of faith point to the exquisite design of eyes, the universe, etc… Hume’s critique: most you can prove is an architect god, not a design god. And the world is not necessarily perfect. Modern critique: Science/Evolution
  • 20. The Cosmological Argument ● Not based on the order of the universe but on the fact that it exists at all. ● There must be an explanation. ● What caused the Big Bang? ● God? ● A feeling“There must be something.”
  • 21.
  • 22. George Berkeley’s A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (1710) presents a form of Metaphysical Idealism which asserts that there are two kinds of reality, idea and spirit. Ideas are real because they can be perceived. Spirit is real because it can have ideas, and because it can perceive them.
  • 23. Berkeley argues that ideas are derived from physical and mental perceptions, from memory, and from imagination. The existence of an idea depends on its being able to be perceived. An idea does not exist unless it is perceived. According to Berkeley, "esse est percipi" ("to be is to be perceived"). The existence of an idea cannot be separated from its being perceived. If an idea or object is not perceived, then it does not exist.
  • 24. The perceiving, active being is referred to by Berkeley as the mind, spirit, soul, or self. The existence of a mind or spirit consists of the ability to have ideas and to perceive them. Spirit, as it perceives ideas, is called the understanding. Spirit, as it produces ideas, or as it mentally operates on them, is called the will.
  • 25. Berkeley argues that there is no substance other than spirit. Substance is not material, but spiritual. Matter neither perceives, nor is perceived. Therefore, matter does not exist. What we describe as matter is only the idea derived from the sensory perception of solidity, extension, form, motion, or other physical properties of an object. But the object only exists if it can perceive or is perceived, and therefore its existence is ideal or spiritual.
  • 26. Berkeley also argues that abstract ideas do not exist. General ideas of qualities may exist, but these general ideas are only representations of particular ideas. According to Berkeley, existence consists of the state of actively perceiving or of passively being perceived. If something is not able to perceive or is not able to be perceived, then it does not exist. Everything that can perceive, or that can be perceived, exists. Everything that exists can either perceive or can be perceived. Berkeley explains that spirit is not itself an idea but that it perceives and produces ideas. Spirit is not itself perceived, but the ideas or effects produced by spirit are perceived. Thus, in order for an idea to exist, there must be a mind or spirit capable of producing or perceiving it. Nothing can exist without a perceiving mind or spirit.
  • 27.
  • 28. Berkeley also explains that spirit is not known by sensory perception, but that its existence can be known by mental perception. Perceiving beings can perceive the presence of each other. Berkeley argues that the existence of God can be perceived by human beings. The spirit of human beings is finite, but the spirit of God is infinite. Berkeley also argues that our own existence as perceiving beings depends on God. He maintains that everything that exists is perceived in the mind of God.
  • 29. Berkeley contends that in order for anything to exist, it must be capable of being perceived. He argues that this does not make the world less real. Indeed, he contends that our ideas of the world are real, but that the world cannot be proved to have an external reality, and that if we approach the world in this way, then we may be able to define valid principles of human knowledge.
  • 30. So what does all that have to do with God? GOD exists, therefore, in order to sense us humans. If God did not perceive us, then we would not exist.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36. Louise Antony’s Arguments Against God - Doesn’t believe in God like she doesn’t believe in ghosts or magic. Denies all supernaturalism. - Just because we cannot know everything is not a reasonable justification for belief in God. - (A lot of religion built on the insufficiency of human cognition.) - So much disagreement across religions. - The argument from evil is most persuasive. - If a benevolent God made the universe then it would be much more good in the world. It makes more sense that it is random “product of mindless natural laws.” - Religious experiences are about humans having human experiences - You can’t just say, “that’s my belief, and that’s that.”
  • 37. L.A.: Well, I do wonder about that. Why do theists care so much about belief in God? Disagreement over that question is really no more than a difference in philosophical opinion. Specifically, it’s just a disagreement about ontology — about what kinds of things exist. Why should a disagreement like that bear any moral significance? Why shouldn’t theists just look for allies among us atheists in the battles that matter — the ones concerned with justice, civil rights, peace, etc. — and forget about our differences with respect to such arcane matters as the origins of the universe?
  • 38. How do our beliefs (or lack of a belief) in God affect our understanding of: ● Science ● History ● Arts ● Ethics ● Each other?