The document discusses an academic's perspective on adopting resource lists to integrate reading lists with the university library catalogue and learning management system. Some key benefits mentioned are streamlining the student experience, avoiding duplicating work by managing reading lists and CLA scans separately, and allowing the library to track student access and borrowing. Potential drawbacks include reducing opportunities for students to practice catalogue searching and the time-consuming nature of setting up the system and scanning CLA materials. Going forward, the author plans to provide feedback to improve catalogue integration and list formatting, monitor student progress, and get assistance setting up additional lists.
2. Resource Lists:
An Academic’s Perspective
Dr Erin Sullivan
@_erinsullivan_
Shakespeare Institute,
University of Birmingham
3. Why adopt?
• University-wide shift – change inevitable
• Avoid duplication of labour – old approach to
reading lists
• Integrated with library catalogue and VLE
• Host for PDF scans produced through
Copyright Licensing Agreement (CLA)
• Distance learning
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. The benefits
• Convergence of information and teaching
systems – streamline student experience
• CLA scans don’t have to be managed and
migrated separately – had been an annual
summer task
• No more separate annual reading list
updates
9. The benefits
• Now that it’s all there, can just adjust it
year on year – work is frontloaded
• Library can keep track of what students
are accessing and borrowing, adjust
buying accordingly
10. The drawbacks
• Possibly reduces opportunities for students
to practice catalogue searching
• CLA scans still time consuming because
library doesn’t yet do the scanning
• Considerable time commitment to set
everything up
• Editing mechanism in ResourceLists fiddly –
multiple layers
11. The drawbacks
• Library catalogue integration not perfect
• Automatically inputted details need editing
• Book chapters awkward because they don’t
have separate catalogue entries
• Ebooks awkward because of discrete (and
disparate) entries in catalogue
12. Going forward
• Feeding back to library about integration
with catalogue – opportunity to review
how entries are formatted, and how
ebook acquisition and access works?
• Feeding back to Talis about editing layers
and book chapter formatting in lists
13. Going forward
• Monitoring student progress and
research capability
• Enlisting help of PG assistant to help with
setting up further lists and CLA scanning
14. Resource Lists:
An Academic’s Perspective
Dr Erin Sullivan
@_erinsullivan_
Shakespeare Institute,
University of Birmingham
First step – prepare my own lists
LEGACY – divided into weekly sections, includes ebooks, CLA scans, A/V eresources
SECOND STEP – Canvas integration
Analytics indicate that vast majority of students are accessing the lists this way, from Canvas:
- During the teaching term, Shakespeare’s legacy list did not get more than 30 direct views (though Shakespearience is listed with 47)
- However, 9 of the 10 items on the ‘top 10’ individual items access list are for scans on Shakespeare's legacy or my other module – all with 50-60 indiv. accesses