The document discusses Syncsort's latest MFX release and the ZPSaver Suite for offloading workload processing to zIIP processors. Syncsort MFX 2.1 provides 15% faster performance through zHPF integration and automated optimization. It also improves installation/deployment and programmer productivity. The ZPSaver Suite uses MFX to offload sort, copy, and compression workloads to zIIP processors, saving significant CPU time and reducing costs through sub-capacity pricing and meeting service level agreements. An analysis of system log data found that using ZPSaver for qualifying workloads could yield yearly savings of over $164,000 in CPU costs.
2. Housekeeping
Webcast Audio:
– Today’s webcast audio is streamed through your computer speakers.
– If you need technical assistance with the web interface or audio, please
reach out to us using the chat window.
Questions Welcome:
– Submit your questions at any time during the presentation using the
chat window.
– We will answer them during our Q&A session following the
presentations.
Recording and Slides:
– This webcast is being recorded. You will receive an email following the
webcast with a link to download both the recording and the slides.
6. 6
Syncsort MFX 2.1 – Better Performance, Better Savings
Faster Performance
• zHPF integration reduces elapsed time by up to 15%
• Enhanced OPTMODES Automatically tune performance
based what is important to YOU (ET vs CPU)
• BALANCE, CPU, ELAP
• Time-of-Day defaults
• Run-Time Overrides
• Optimization for zEC12, zBC12 and z196 models
• Optimizations for z/OS 2.2
7. Syncsort MFX 2.1 – Making Life Easier
7
Easier Installation & Deployment
• Specify installation options in SYS1.PARMLIB
• Greater flexibility. Support for multiple sets of options if
required by LPARs
Higher Productivity
• More data manipulation functions such as field type
comparisons and parsed field identification
• 64-bit addressing for exits – E15, E32, E35 – and
invoking programs
8. Sort Poll #1
Syncsort Confidential and Proprietary - do not copy or distribute 8
Q2. What is the #1 sort-related issue your organization
faces today?
Hitting our designated time window SLA
Speed and performance overall
We want to lower sort-related MLC costs
Other
(Check all that apply)
11. Sort Poll #2
Q1. What is your organization’s use of zIIP engines today?
Have zIIP and use them for a variety of workload types
Have zIIP and use it for limited workload types (Java)
Have zIIP but not using in production
Don’t have zIIP but are considering adding zIIP engines
Don’t Know
(Check all that apply)
12. ZPSaver Suite
Shift Critical Copy, Compression & Sort Workloads to zIIP Processors
SMS Compression
in zIIP
Offload compression
work to zIIP processors
Syncsort MFX 2.1
High performance sort, merge, and copy. Offload to zIIP engines. Save
significant CPU time while reducing total elapsed time.
Syncsort MFX 2.1 Provides Foundation for ZPSaver Suite
12
Sort in zIIP
Offload Sort
processing
to zIIP processors
Copy in zIIP
Offload Copy
processing
to zIIP processors
ZPSaver Suite
13. Get More Value from zIIP Engines with ZPSaver Suite
13
Syncsort Confidential and Proprietary - do not copy or distribute
Sub-capacity
Pricing
Hardware
upgrades
MSU-capped
LPAR
Hosting /
Outsourcing
Chargeback
Reduces billable CPU and contains
overall software costs
Delays hardware upgrades as data
volumes increase
Supports more work and frees up
capacity
Results in lower fees and bills
Batch
Window
Meeting SLAs & batch window
reduces risk and associated costs
to the business
14. ZPSaver Suite SMF Analysis
14
Syncsort Confidential and Proprietary - do not copy or distribute
Syncsort SMF Analysis Costs and Savings
Earliest Syncsort MFX Execution: 15-Jul-2016 Qualifying Resource Costs
Latest Syncsort MFX Execution: 22-Jul-2016 Monthly Compression CPU Time: (mins) 1,264
Number of Days Analyzed: 7 Monthly Non-Compression CPU Time: (mins) 1,044
Number of Systems Found: 3
Compression Estimated Savings
# of Sorts with Input and/or Output Compression: 4,981 Monthly Compression CPU Time: (mins) 1,105
Related CPU Time: (mins) 183 Monthly Non-Compression CPU Time: (mins) 797
Related Elapsed Time: (mins) 2,694
# of Sorts Qualifying for ZPSaver: 4,981 Yearly Savings ZPSaver CPU Time: (mins) 22,816
Qualifying Sort CPU Time: (mins) 183 Yearly Savings ZPSaver CPU Time: $164,273
Qualifying Sort Elapsed Time: (mins) 2,694
# of Copies with Input and/or Output Compression: 2,005
Related CPU Time: (mins) 108
Related Elapsed Time: (mins) 994 **CPU=TCB+SRB
# of Copies Qualifying for ZPSaver: 2,003
Qualifying Copy CPU Time: (mins) 108
Qualifying Copy Elapsed Time: (mins) 993
Non-Compression
# of Sort Executions: 191,312
Related CPU Time: (mins) 426
Related Elapsed Time: (mins) 13,908
# of Sorts Qualifying for ZPSaver: 152,122
Qualifying CPU Time: (mins) 188
Qualifying Elapsed Time: (mins) 8,762
# of Copy Executions: 138,847
Related CPU Time: (mins) 53
Related Elapsed Time: (mins) 4,351
# of Copies Qualifying for ZPSaver: 138,679
Qualifying CPU Time: (mins) 52
Qualifying Elapsed Time: (mins) 4,335