9. Initial analysis of Bongo Habitat Selection
Understorey structure – 400 m2
-> Field data
Patch structure – 20 ha
-> ASTER + Spectral Mixture
Analysis
~450 m
Estes et al, 2008, Remote Sensing of Environment
10. 10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Observed
SCI
score
Predicted
SCI
score
X
o
Non-‐presence
obs
(training)
+
Bongo
obs
(test)
Mean
of
non-‐presence
obs
Mean
of
bongo
obs
Model
–
5
ASTER-‐derived
predictors
3
Spectral
Mixture
Analysis
2
texture
variables
R2
=
0.46
RMSE:
Training
=
17%
Test
=
19%
Estes
et
al,
2010
(Remote
Sensing
Environment)
Mapping
Structural
Complexity
Indices
12. ~450
m
Hand
launch
a
small
UAV…
…And
collect
high
quality
data
in
transects,
rather
than
slogging
it
• Understorey
+
canopy
• 3
dimensions
• Micro
–
landscape
scale
• Every
few
weeks
13. Estes, Chaney, Herrera-Estrada, Sheffield, Caylor, Wood, 2014, ERL
Bringing the Satellite Closer to The Field
Beat down error in remotely sensed yield estimates
Crop-specific NDVI signature
Estes et al, 2013, Glob Ecol Biogeog, Glob Change Biol
23. For effective use of UAS
Need:
1. Geometrically
2. Optically
3. Automated
Rectification
of
collected
data
in
space
&
time
domains
23
24. Course Goals
By end of week:
1. Understand what can (and probably cannot) be done
with UAS
2. Learn how to plan and fly mission
3. Successfully post-process imagery, and understand
key factors to correct
4. Basic analysis of results