Legal Abuse Syndrome is a caused mainly by a corrupt Judge note establishing Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Note: Americans understand what SMJ is as it is everything. When a judge does not establish SMJ it is never too late to go back and sue them for crimes against humanity. There is a cure for corruption in the court rooms, it is called exposure.
Kangaroo Court Continues as SMJ is everything.pptx
1. Why SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION IS EVERYTHING TO AMERICANS, therefore,
Americans must know –
courts get their authority from one source and only one source = pleadings
sufficient to empower the court to act meaning one of the parties must give the
court its power to act by way of written and oral argument (the parties not their
attorney attorneys must do this
2. Purpose: Demonstrate to Americans the following:
(1) How the deep state/court system plays Americans using
our real time RICO case(s) against them
(2) Explain why subject matter jurisdiction is everything
(3) Explain how the deep state manipulates god’s natural law aka common law
(4) Explain courts/judge’s responsibilities to Americans
(5) Solution: (1) Quo warranto (2) DOD
3. Objective: Expose the treason in
the united States courts and jails
in America against Americans as
everything is business “aka” a rich
man’s trick
4. Agenda
(1) Explain why Subject Matter Jurisdiction(Personal
and Sufficiency of pleading) is everything & How to
prepare yourself before court
(2) Example of how the courts DO NOT establish SMJ
using our real time RICO/Crimes Against Humanity
case
(a) 2015 Aunty Evalani Yockman and
Washington State
(b) 2018 Sue and Robert VS VA/DC/MD
(c) 2019 Jeff Blochowicz, Augusta, GA
(d) 2022 Lee and Luanne, Hillsborough, FL
(e) 2022 Brad vs Hillsborough/TAMPA, FL
(f) 2022 Darryl Brooks (National Case)
5. Agenda
AGENDA (Continued)
(3) Explain how the deep state manipulates God’s natural law
using:
(a) Common law designed by Sir Edward Cooke
(b) Contract law courts are private corporations (CLEARFIELD
DOCTINE they abide by contract law aka they can play,
but they cannot get caught/they cannot escape
responsibility.
(4) Explain courts/judge’s responsibilities & Oath to Americans
and how they commit TREASON
(5) Solution: (1) Quo Warranto/Pro confesso (2) DOD and (3)
International Criminal Court (ICC)
(6) References/Past Precedent which means any act, decision,
or case that serves as a guide or justification for subsequent
decisions
7. We have a two-tiered court system
Note: The United
States is a foreign
corporation.
The United States
Inc is the prime
contractor and
the Agencies are
the subcontracts
with a charter.
They violate their
charter/oath they
commit a
felony/Treason
against
Americans.
The United States
Inc Military has
two contracts
with Americans
(1) United States
Inc President
(CEO) and
(2) Service
Contract for
Americans
8. What they
don’t tell
Americans:
• There is only 1 law, GOD’s Natural Law. We have an obligation to stand up and object anyone who violates
our GOD given rights.
• The 1st time, a judge, prosecutor and etc (1) violate your right, (2) the due process clause, and (3) safety,
they forfeit the right to hold that leadership/Officer of the Court position.
• If you don’t know your rights, you don’t have rights and whatever happens to you, it is on you. Treason is
happening. WHY? The COURT is ALWAYS FAIR. THE JUDGE IS NOT THE COURT.
• Everything must be on the record due to contract law.
• The United States is a foreign corporation.
• They play administrative F to change your reality. They usually take 10 years. During this time, they hope to
dismiss, delay and or deny your higher court case against them.
• They have no fear of writing void orders against AMERICANS because the FOX GUARDS THE HEN HOUSE
(EXECUTIVE ORDER 12196)
• Washington, Jefferson, General Pratt stole the Americans/Indigenous land by (1) killing the elderly, (2)
oppressing and killing the children, (3) Standing up residential schools, (4) changing the culture, standing,
(5) re-label them meaning dead (e.g. Indians, black, slaves, nigger, negro, minority, taking away the flag).
• Sir Edward Cooke, directed the Europeans not only designed common law, but he ignored the charter of
the Forest and replaced charter of the FOREST with 1871 KKK Act and 1983 KKK Act which means you
cannot throw out a case until the victims are made whole and relief is mandatory.
• When anyone violates your GOD given rights, you have standing to sue them under 18 USC 241, 242, 42
USC 1983 KKK, 42 USC 1985, 42 USC 1986 and the ADA Interference Act.
• The 14 Amendment was really designed not for slaves but for corporations
• Never confuse the United States Inc and America/Americans
• The United States Inc is (1) the prime contractor and (2) the Agencies are the subcontracts with a charters.
• When you sue any United States Inc corporation, you must put the UNITED STATE INC on the fact of the
claim vs the subcontractor.
9. What they
don’t tell
Americans
(continued) :
• If the United States Inc, Employees violate their charter and or oath of office, they commit
a Felony/Treason against Americans/their own constitution.
• In order for the constitution to be legal it must reflect the will of the majority of the
people.
• The constitution is supposed to reflect GOD’s natural law, hence the reason if Common
Law designed by Sir Edward Cooke, conflicts with GOD’s Natural Law it can be changed.
• The Judges, Prosecutors, Lawyers, DOJ, Sheriff’s Department, Jails and their pawns play
administrative trickery with the law, in court and with the American People
• The Attorneys work for the BAR designed by Bankers, Rockerfellers.
• The system developed 1990 ADA Act and ADA Reps as a front to steal more money from
Americans. For example: They pretend they are taking care of the weak (e.g., elderly,
service-disabled veteran, children and people.
• The United States Inc’s leaders have to be just as dirty as Epstein
• The United States Inc Military has two contracts with Americans (1) United States Inc
President (CEO) and (2) a Service Contract to Keep American’s safe
• Their rules are not laws, but rules to their constitution
• Article Three Section one on their constitution NOTHING can be PRESUMED to act
Jurisdictional
• Courts of Inferior or limited jurisdiction have no inherent jurisdictional authority, no
inherent judicial power whatsoever. Courts are empowered by one source: SUFFICIENTY OF
PLEADING – Meaning one of the partied appearing before the inferior court must literally give
the court its judicial power by completing jurisdiction.
10. What they
don’t tell
Americans
(continued) :
• They manipulate the court records/tapes (e.g., clerks in sheriff’s
department)
• They use the sheriff’s department to issue fake warrants and put you in
jail for at least 3 days
• They own the Dr’s and Nurses who offer victims Blood pressure medicine
• Their foreign nurses are replacing nurses before the nurse retires (see
Augusta, GA)
• The prosecutors are threating competent fact witnesses, protecting the
perpetrators
• The prosecutors and judges are offering victims pleas without establishing
SMJ
• They release victims at night and don’t allow the elderly and service-
disabled veterans to use their cane, walker and reasonable
accommodations
• They track you using your medica records and AT&T
• They hire Third Party Contractors, ORM, Post Office, and etc to TROLL you.
• They spend more on retaliation against the WHISTLEBLOWER vs their real
job.
• They play on your fear
• There are 25 things they can NEVER TAKE AWAY FROM AMERICANS…
11. The 25 things the United States Inc and their courts cannot take
away from Americans but they will try…Remember their rules are
not law, but rules for their corrupt pedo corporation. Your
thoughts are your reality. Their goal is to change your reality and
do what they say. Know your true worth, and they wont get away
with their crimes against humanity
23. The United States Constitution Article Three, Section one, you cannot presume THESE
PEOPLE WILL act judicially. You are dealing with cult members. Sir Edward Cooke designed
Common law to trick Americans out of giving up their rights.
24.
25. Chief Justice Roberts is the Chief Justice which speaks volume as he is
friends with EPSTEIN
27. Case must be tried by a jury their game is to commit perjury until it is time
for a jury. Also, in Brad’s case, Judge Margaret Taylor has explaining to do.
28. When anyone ignores their oath and violates HUMAN RIGHTS (e.g, due
process clause, safety) TREASON is happening
29. Remember: Public Servant (Judges, Attorneys, DOJ, VA, Police Officers, Sheriff’s
Department, and DOD) cannot take AMERICAN tax dollars and deny HUMAN
RIGHTS.
BLUF: Ask this question: If AMERICANS pay PUBLIC SERVANTS tax dollars to do their
job and if they are not doing their job, who is the third party paying them not to do
their job. In other words, who is bribing them to commit TREASON and NOT DO
THEIR JOB?
35. Management
Methodology
*
Focus
Step 6 Management Execution
•Develop Status Charts/Control Procedures/Define
Responsibilities
Step 4 Develop Strategies/Procedures
•Update all procedures/Schedules
•Update before, during and after the events
Step 5 Applicable Forms/Documents
•AAR/Track/Documents
Step 3 Assign Tasks
•SME, Nurse, Doctor, Mentors, Legal Assistance, ADA, EEO.
Step 2 Leverage Existing Data
•Rules, Regulations, Policies, Federal Law/Internal and External VA
Employees/News/Mr. Burke, Mr. Murphy and Mr Clark
testimony via congress
Step 1 Assemble Team
•VA (internal/ External), Generals, SMES, EEO, ADA
36. Management Methodology
(continued)
Focus/Main Priority: Robert and Austin
Step 7
Develop Status
Chart/Control
Procedures
•Define
Responsibilities
Step 8
Meetings
•Keep the lines of
communication
open
•Internal
Meetings/Interface
Step 9
Coordinate
Internal Audits
•Internal Audits to
insure accurate data
37. Know who you are dealing with
by interviewing insiders or other
whistleblowers
38. My note after
interviewing
insiders
• They (Attorneys in Building 810 and Judy Valois in Sarasota, FL) use perjury as their friend see 2018 Transmittal Files
• They violate the Westfall Act
• If you win mediation and take it outside of VA, that means they will retaliate against you using the Sheriff’s Department, VA Agencies (IRS), Go
into your records, Leaders will not respond ref 42 USC 1986, Voncelle is a throw-away, they reward her by allowing her to go TDY and get GS15
pay.
• Voncelle is well known to use the courts and set up other victims
• They call building 810 the plantation. They play black on black, white on white.
• They communicate with everyone. They know when you file against them.
• They go into your records
• They deny benefits so don’t have money to use against them
• They try to convince you to hire their attorney using state courts and public records
• Everyone VA leader omitted without fear on government documents
• The General Counsel & Attorneys in building 810 directed Doctor Racha to alter Robert’s medical records
• They hired the Post Office, Dr. Klein, Gail Leary and Hawkins to alter inspection/medical records and files
• They hire the EEOC Judge
• They have 180 days to kick your ass and build your files
• They deny board certified doctors order, FMLA leave
• They go into your medical records to exacerbate your condition
• They hired ORM to order Voncelle James and interns (Jada) to go into our medical records and or alter records using the Army’s safe server
• They steal ADA funds and deny ADA rights
• They sanction the other agencies for not obeying their crimes
• They go into your personal records using AT&T phone records
• They reach out to different states, sheriff’s departments and Attorney Generals to set victims up.
(
• They use the courts at every level
They meet after hours or at three
40. Their goal – get into your head and
change your reality to their reality
as your thoughts are your reality
41. THE CABAL’s
G- Staff
Personnel and
support
• G1 – Personnel, Parent Unit (Vatican, Queen, and 1
percent) Third-Party Contractors, Agencies, Trolls, Senators
and Contractors
• G2 – Intelligence (ORM, Third Party Contractors, FBI, CIA)
• G3 –Operations (DC Building 810, Sarasota, FLA, Redstone
Army Arsenal)
• G4 – Logistics – Building 810 and Red Stone Army Arsenal
• G5 – Community Service/Allies, Agencies
• G6 – Communications – Courts, AT&T, Benefits,
EEOC/ORM, Medical records, FB tracking, Phone tracking
and etc.
• G7 – Training (13 Schools) and Building 810
• G8 – Finance – American tax dollars, dead veterans, dead
doctors, wounded warrior games, elderly estates (old
money), service-disabled veterans (delay, deny and wait
until you die aka administrative trickery)
42. Military
Decision
Matrix Process
(see slides)
• Problem Statement
• Prior Coordination
• Management Methodology
• Timeline
• EEO Process encountered
• Cause of Actions [26 claims]
• Facts
• Assumptions bearing on the facts
• COAs (1-3)
• Screening Criteria
• Comparison
• Evaluations
• Analysis
• Conclusion/Recommendation
• Back Up Slides
43. References
• A. The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 701
• B. Executive Order 13164,
• C. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Policy Guidance on Executive Order 13164
• D. Equal Employment Opportunity Enforcement Guidance
on Reasonable Accommodation and Undue Hardship
Under the American's with Disabilities Act (October 17,
2002),
• E. Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act
(ADAAA) of 2008, Public Law 110-325, effective 2009.
THAT one who relies on prior decisions of the Supreme Court
has a perfect defense for willfulness. (U.S. v. Bishop, 412 U.S.
346 (1973), as “The claim and exercise of a Constitutional
right cannot be converted into a crime.”(Miller v. U.S., 230
F.2d. 486, 489 (1956).
44. References
continued
GOD’s Universal Law
1214 Magna Carta –
Leaders/All - Treat
everyone equal
1217 Charter of the
Forest – Everyone
receives a Fair Trial if
violated
Westfall Act – Cannot
use government
attorneys (DOJ) to
defend
OATH OF OFFICE -
Once Judge violates:
(1) safe-guards and/or
(2) due process clause,
treason is happening
TN VS Lane - Nobody
gets immunity when
you sue them under
TITLES II & III of the
ADA Act
Relief is mandatory as
per:
18 USC 241
18 USC 242 18 USC 246 18 USC 1001 18 USC 1341
18 USC 1512
42 USC 1983 KKK, 1871
KKK and Charter of the
Forest – Trial
42 USC 1985 42 USC 1986
45. Military
Decision
Matrix
AGENDA
• Problem Statement
• Prior Coordination
• Management Methodology
• Timeline
• EEO Process encountered
• Cause of Actions [21, 200, 400 claims]
• Facts
• Assumptions
• COAs (1-3)
• Screening Criteria
• Comparison
• Evaluations
• Analysis
• Conclusion/Recommendation
• Back Up Slides
46. Military
Decision
Matrix
AGENDA
• We are dealing with a corrupt foreign corporation that
hires third party traitors at every level. They lie, cheat, steal,
gaslight and do the OPPOSITE while they use: (1) Agencies, (2)
Third Parties, (3) Courts, (4) Judges, (5) Prosecutors, (6)
Electronic Filing, (7) Clerks, (8) Judges, (9) Trolls, (10) Third
Parties, (11) Void Orders, (12) Fake Police Reports, (13) Fake
Peace Orders, (14) Fake Criminal Courts, (15) Sheriffs
Department, (16) Commissioners, (17) and etc
47. PROBLEM
STATEMENT
ref: Working
with VA
(Continued)
• Ref initial EEOC complaint: Damage has been done as the
working/living conditions are so Intolerable that a reasonable
person in Robert’s position [and with his disabilities] would feel
compelled to resign.
• Pennsylvania state Police v. Suders, 542 U.S. 129, 147 (2004) .
Accord Poland v. Chertoff, 494 F. 3d 1174, 1184 (9th circuit
2007); See also Emeldi v Univ. of Or., 673 F.3d 1218, 1225 (9th
Cir.2012) holding in Title VII retaliation case that constructive
discharge occurs when “a retaliating employer creates working
conditions so extraordinary and egregious as to overcome the
normal motivation of a competent, diligent, and reasonable
employee to remain on the job.
• Their issue: They wanted Dr. Price to change her ADA
Reasonable Accommodation complaint against how VA HQ was
treating Robert which proved construction discharge.
48. Dr. Prices’ Comments about VA
that caused the retaliation. In
addition, we wrote a 300 page
document which described how
VA cheats Americans and service
disabled veterans out of millions
50. My response to VA
leaders, VA
Attorneys and VA’s
ADA ADVOCATE
51. Get a Team of
Subject Matter
Experts VS.
Attorneys. VA
pays the
attorneys under
the table (See
Jeff’s case)
• We selected a team of SME vs. Attorneys
because:
• The practice of Law is an occupation of common
right, the same being a secured liberty right. (Sims v.
Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)) Schware v. Board of
Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238,
239. "The practice of law cannot be licensed by any
state/State." Should any state convert a secured
liberty right into a privilege, charge a fee and issue a
license for it, one may ignore the license and fee and
engage in the exercise of the right with impunity.
(Shuttlesworth vs. City of Birmingham 373 U.S. 262
(1962)).
• Members of groups who are competent
nonlawyers can assist other members of the group to
achieve the goals of the group in court without being
charged with "unauthorized practice of law.“ NAACP
v. Button, 371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of
America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715; and Johnson v. Avery,
89 S. Ct. 747 (1969).
• THAT one who relies on prior decisions of the
Supreme Court has a perfect defense for willfulness.
(U.S. v. Bishop, 412 U.S. 346 (1973), as “The claim and
exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted
into a crime.”(Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d. 486, 489 (1956).
• BLUF: Solution – writ of Mandamus and Quo
Warranto
52. 2018 Mediation PRIOR COORDINATION
Robert Bozgoz ‘s Support Team Veteran’s Affairs
Robert Bogzgoz- VA Employee Voncelle James – Supervisor
Sue Bozgoz- (ADA Representative) [Austin] Angela Kendrix – Director, VBA
Ethel Briggs – SME (ADA) Ronald Burke - Dep Under Sec Field Ops
Larry Hughes (ADA)
Mangram- SME (Nurse) Willie Clarke – Sec Field Ops
Robert - SME (EEO) Brandye Terrell – Deputy Chief of Staff
Willie L- SME (EEO and ADA) Kevin Brown- HR/ADA Coordinator
*Hjordis Jones – SME (EEO ADVISOR & ADA Representative) Mike Frueh– Chief of Staff
Dr Price – COA 3, Doctor Melvin Gerrets – Division Chief Comp Serv
*Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
General Joe Dunford and Staff- Asked to be Impartial/DOD
Karen Agee – VA HR Director
General Robert Shadley – ADA/MENTOR COA 3 Chris Wunsch- ADA Director
* General Russel Honore - Mediation in Good Faith French Bryant – EEO Representative
*Theresa – VA Alternate ADA Representative Dr. Racha - VA Doctor- Fab 2018 Med Doc
Candace - VA Coworker Under Sec- Thomas Murphy
53. TIMELINE OF VIOLATIONS (Page 1 of 3)
Dec 2016
* Robert questions Voncelles unfair practices and she fails to respond (protected by
11 Jan 2018
Chief of Staff involvement with ADA request and allowed (e,g., ADA rep, work from home, Med doc Rep named and provided to HR/Division
POC.
Vocelle give Robert a void letter of reprimand/retaliation
Sue informs HR and Mr Bryand that retaliation against law
31 Jan 2018 Mr Brown informs Sue that he has no 2016 ADA
Records of Rob, therefore, ADA does not exists.
Dec 2016 Initial Harassment with Division Chief, Angela.
24 Jan 2018 Melvin J contacts Rob and informs him that Voncelle/Angela
has requested an investigation against him ref: 12 Jan.
Rob forms HR that he intends to file an EEO complaint due to civil rights
Violation.
17 Jan 2018
Robert called into Voncelle’s office w/o ADA rep and harassed.
Voncelle told Rob for times that she demand he speak. Rob refuses.
Rob emails Voncelle for HR, Kevin Brown and Voncelle response
16 Jan 2018
Voncelle calls meeting. When discover Robert request ADA representative she post/canc
12 Jan 2018
EEO complaint filed and packet filed with HR and General Dunford cc’d
18 Jan 2018
30 Jan 2018 Rob and Sue, ADA Rep meet with Melvin J. ADA rep informs
Melvin, HR and EEO that retaliation and intimidation against the law
*ADA rep informs Voncelle of leave issue .
Nov 2018
19 Jan 2018
31 Jan 2018
54. TIMELINE OF VIOLATIONS (Page 2 of 3)
Feb 2018
French Byant, EEO informs Sue that Voncelle & Angela agree to mediation wont
Remove void reprimand. Voncelle states she isnot responsible for Rob’s 2016 harassment.
Feb 2018
Sue fires VA Doc & finds other Doc for Rob. Voncelle calls Rob in meeting and ask for copy of letter of
Reprimand. Sue informs Voncelle that she cannot harass Rob.
Brown informs Sue due to urgency going to send ADA request to director.
Chris coordinate another interactive ADA meeting. Sue request Gen Shadley and
Outside support. Meeting taped and medical file given to director which he leaves on
table . General Dunford staff contact Sue and states he needs to be fair.
APR 2018 Voncelle and Director sends Sue the results of ADA accommodations.
Sue sends to doctor and doctor tells her to take VA to court because
they have ignored her on purpose as they have done nothing but willfully harm.
Feb 2018
MAR 2018
Sue demands VA not delay reasonable accommodation. Stress affects son.
23 Feb 2018
Stress affects Son. Rob returns to work and Voncelle calls Rob into office w/o ADA rep. Sue asked Theresa to assist.
Voncelle/Angela harass Theresa. Brown inform Sue to update RA as per they directed. Sue disagrees. Mr. Burke asks
for mediation due to the harassment.
HR ask so to recollect med records. Sue updates medical doc and sends: 1) 2016
med doc 2) suppl doc and 3) to FMLA (2 weeks) doc to VA.
20 Feb 16 Jan 2018
Sue Contacts Under Sec, Sec, Chief ask them to stop the harassment. Under Sec
response and ask for Robs information as if they are interested in helping.
Feb 2018
Robert and Sue arrive at VA to attend RA meeting. Mr. Brown & Ms Agee informs Sue
to change Doc’s RA doc to remove harassment. Brown Informs Sue that higher is involved
and to be nice. Brown enters RA in RAPIDS . Voncelle goes on unexpected leave.
Mar 2018
APR 2018
Sue informs HR and command that stress affecting son and if he has a reset
She will hold them accountable as he has been institutionalized due to his disability.
Sue contacts Chief of Staff to utilize open door policy. Negative Response. Sue responds to letter of
Reprimand. Later, Voncelle denies it.
Feb 2018
MAR 2018
APR 2018
Sue calls VA Doc to provide 2016 reasonable accommodation to VA 2xs. Doc calls Rob ask Doc on phone and
In writing to provide 2016 reasonable accommodations. VA Doc fabricates 2018 RA documents and sends.
Doctor fills out FMLA for a year in an effort to protect Robert from harassment. Mr. Brown
Informs the Bozgozes to tell the doctor to redo the FMLA document on the right form. Then
reminds Sue that she needs to have the doctor to update RA doc. Bozgoz disagrees.
55. TIMELINE OF VIOLATIONS (Page 3 of3)
.
17 April 2018 – VAADA Director cc’d contacts Sue and informs her if she
Disagrees with their ADA results fill out another form.
18 April 2018 – Sue informs VA that it has become personal and the next
Step in ADA violations is court.
19 April 2018 - Sue contacts EEO coordinator, Gary Richardson
and informs him that VA disregarded the Doctors and General Shadley
guidance ref: do no harm. Sue requested that the additional ADA violation
be added to the 26 other ADA and 1973 Rehabilitation violations. Gary agrees.
56. EEO Process/Program
*ADA Rep contacts Voncelle James * EEO SME: Bob Smith and Niki Jones
18 Jan
Sue Contacts EEO
CC: VA HR, Gen Dunford
ADR 24 April 2018
31 Jan 2018
Robert Receive
Letter of Reprimand
ORM French Bryant
&
Mr. Ron Burke
Informal to Formal
3 Items vs 26 Items
Bryant vs Bozgoz
FMLA LEAVE
Reasonable
Accommodation Denied
Reasonable Accommodation
17 Jan 2018
Robert emails Voncelle
19 Jan
Voncelle Bullies Robert
into talking . Report to HR
VA Leader
Directors
Other VA Directors
Supervisors
HR [Supervisors/Staff/ADA]
ORM Informal (French Bryant)
EEO/Harassment
Coordinator [Mediator]
*NOTE: ORM is employed by VA
24 Jan Melvin Gerrett
calls investigation for
30 Jan 2018
Warn HR and Melvin Garrett that
harassment is against the law
Bozgoz Contacts EEO
HR
HR provides Bozgoz French
Browns Bosses Number
2 Feb 2018 HR
Office Resolution
Management
ADA/FMLA Undue Delay
ADR to stop Harassment and
remove void letter of reprimand
Mediation
Prove 26 Violation
6 Dec 2016
Harassment
27 Nov 2017
Time and Allowance
* Interactive process
starts via email
12 Jan 2018
Robert returned from
FMLA. Within minutes
he Was in another
meeting
Without his ADA
representative
57. .
Know the Cause of Actions
Comment
Race 1981 (300,000 limited does not apply due to racial discrimination) No limitation ($600,000)
Under 1981A (Disability, Age, Retaliation) $300,000 Maximum. Punitive Damages under 42 U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1).
HIPPA/Privacy Act (2 each) (2016 & 2018) $50,000 to $250,000 (3 time – 2016)
Willful Violation (KKK) 1983 of Title 42 of USC Code Jury is not entitled to place a monetary value on constitutional rights violations of
which was deprived/punitive damage
Married/Minority (non Federal Employee) $300,000. Punitive Damages under 42 U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1). Separate Cause of Action/RICO
Son (non government entity)
VA caused emotional set back on purpose
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbDR_lWmdXo
$300,000. Punitive Damages under 42 U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1). A person who knowingly obtains
or discloses individually
identifiable health information in
violation of the Privacy Rule may
face a criminal penalty of up to
$50,000 and up to one-year
imprisonment. The criminal
penalties increase to $100,000
and up to five years imprisonment
if the wrongful conduct involves
false pretenses, and to $250,000
and up to 10 years imprisonment
if the wrongful conduct involves
the intent to sell, transfer, or use
identifiable health information for
commercial advantage, personal
gain or malicious harm. The
Department of Justice is
responsible for criminal
prosecutions under the Privacy
Act. We reserve the right to
contact hospital to file complaint
and to file a complaint with the
MD Medial Board.
Attorney’s Fee/Representative ADA and Dr. Price $80,000
Subject Matter Expert Fees (ADA) (24 April) $30,000
Subject Matter Expert Fee (EEO) (24 April) $10,000
Subject Matter Expert Fee (Medical) (24 April) $10,000
ADA Rep (Theresa) /ADA Violation $10,000 (110,000)
VA Doctor Falsifying Medical Record RICO (treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory
damages).
RICO Act: treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory
damages).
Tremble Damages: must allege (1) that the defendant received money from a
pattern of racketeering activity, (2) invested that money in an enterprise, (3) the
enterprise affected interstate commerce, and (4) an injury resulting from the
investment of racketeering income distinct from an injury caused by the predicate
acts themselves.
58. COA 1: Do Nothing
COA 2: Expose their crimes to America
via leaders, DOD then Writ of Mandamus
and Quo Warranto
COA 3: DOD Court [sue parent unit and
everyone in their individual capacity
official capacity]
COURSE OF ACTION (COA)
60. .
COA 1: Relief that would have been available had the matter been heard in court:
COA 1
Comment
Race Discrimination: 1981 (only applies with Race) No limitation ($600,000). 1981
Punitive Damage awarded when practice is done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federal
protected rights
• Constructive Discharge
• Changes in policies
• Manage Training
Under 1981A (Disability, Age, Retaliation and etc.) $300,000 Maximum Cap. Punitive Damages under 42 U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1). Eligibility for punitive
damages depends on the state of mind the leadership were in, Kolstad v Am. Dental Ass’n, 527 US 526,
535 (1999).
Promote future compliance
HIPPA/Privacy Act (2 each) (2016, VA Doctor, 2018) ($150,000 )
Note: $50,000 to $250,000 (3 time – 2016, VA Dr, and 2018)
5-10 years 150,000
Willful Violation (KKK) 1983 of Title 42 of USC Code Jury is not entitled to place a monetary value on constitutional rights violations of which was
deprived/punitive damage ($300,000)
*Rule 65 of the Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure. Allows court to stop retaliation
Married/Minority (non Federal Employee) /ADA/Emotional $300,000 (Not Capped) under 42 U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1). Separate Cause of Action/RICO
Son (non government entity)/Emotional VA Caused a emotional set back on purpose)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbDR_lWmdXo
$300,000 (Not Capped). under 42 U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1). A person who knowingly obtains or
discloses individually identifiable health
information in violation of the Privacy Rule
may face a criminal penalty of up to
$50,000 and up to one-year
imprisonment. The criminal penalties
increase to $100,000 and up to five years
imprisonment if the wrongful conduct
involves false pretenses, and to $250,000
and up to 10 years imprisonment if the
wrongful conduct involves the intent to sell,
transfer, or use identifiable health
information for commercial advantage,
personal gain or malicious harm. The
Department of Justice is responsible for
criminal prosecutions under the Privacy
Act. We reserve the right to contact
hospital to file complaint and to file a
complaint with the MD Medial Board.
Transfer to GA at VA expense under ADA Violation law $155,000.
Representative ADA (Title 42 Section 126)/ADA and Dr Price $80,000
Expert Fees (ADA) (1981A and 1981) $30,000
Expert Fee (EEO) (1981A and 1981) $10,000
Expert Fee (Medical) (1981A and 1981) $10,000
ADA Rep (Theresa $10,000) /ADA Right ($110,000) $10,000 and $110, 000)
VA Doctor Falsifying Medical Record RICO (treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages).
RICO Act: treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages) or Use
Solution: Grant Money ($3 Million) to train VA Employees, ORM, and HR on ADA, Counseling, and EEO.
Tremble Damages: must allege (1) that the defendant received money from a pattern of racketeering
activity, (2) invested that money in an enterprise, (3) the enterprise affected interstate commerce, and
(4) an injury resulting from the investment of racketeering income distinct from an injury caused by the
predicate acts themselves.
61. .
COA #1: Relief that would have been available had the matter been heard in
court.
• Robert 1981 (600,000)+ 1981A (300,000)+HIPAA (150,000) +Taxes =$1,050,000
• Sue (ADA Rep) KKK 1983 (300,000)+ Emotional/ADA (300,000) +Taxes $600,000
• Austin (ADA) (300,000) +Taxes = $300,000
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbDR_lWmdXo)
• Attorney and Expert Fees: 1981/1981A ($140,000) + Training = $140,000 +$155,000
• Transfer to GA at VA’s expense under ADA violation law ~$150,000
• Robert Returns to work with leave restored
• Use Grant Money under 1981/1981A to UDC to ADA/Counseling training
• ~3 Million
• Hold VA, DOD and everyone accountable in their own individual capacity
• Mandatory “tracked” [outside] training [ADA, EEO, Counseling] for all
supervisors (Use Grant 3 Million to UDC)
• Coordinate with UDC to provide “tracked” counseling to VA employees
[student supervised training] [win-win]
• Restore leave
• Hire special assistant to figure out ORM/EECO process
***We reserve the right to sue RICO and Privacy Act Violations
COA 1 RECAP
62. .
COA 2: Base Relief on Retirement (22 years with Benefit, $106 X 22 plus benefits
promotion and taxes ~2.8 Million) + Expert + UDC training + 3 X s
COA 2
Retirement 1981A/1981/ADA/Constructive Termination 2.8 Million + Taxes
ADA Representative $300,000
Austin $300,000
Transfer Back to GA under ADA Law $155,000
Attorney’s Fee/Representative ADA 1981A/1918 $80,000
Expert Fees (ADA) 1981A/1981 $30,000
Expert Fee (EEO) 1981A/1981 $10,000
Expert Fee (Medical Nurse) 1981A/1981 $10,000
ADA Rep (Theresa) /ADA and 1981A/1981/Doctor Price $110,000 (Teresa $10,000)
Solution: ***1981/1981A Grant Money ($3 Million) to train VA
Employees, ORM, and HR on ADA, Counseling, and EEO.
63. .
• COA #2: Base Relief on Retirement (22 years with Benefit, $106 X 22 plus
benefits, promotion and taxes ~2.8 Million) + ADA Rep, + Son + expert
• Attorney and Expert Fees: 1981/1981A ($140,000) + Training = $140,000
• ADA Rep $300,000
• Son $300,000 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbDR_lWmdXo)
• Transfer to GA at VA expense ADA Violation law $155,000
• Use Grant Money under 1981/1981A to UDC to ADA/Counseling training
• ~3 Million
• Hold VA, DOD and everyone accountable in their own individual capacity
• Mandatory “tracked” [outside] training [ADA, EEO, Counseling] for all
supervisors (Use Grant 3 Million to UDC)
• Coordinate with UDC to provide “tracked” counseling to VA employees
[student supervised training] [win-win]
• Restore leave
• Hire special assistant to figure out ORM/EECO process
***We reserve the right to sue RICO and Privacy Act Violations
COA 2 RECAP
RECOMMENDATION
64. .
COA 3: Relief that would have been available had the matter been heard in court:
COA 3
Comment
Race 1981 (does not apply) No limitation ($600,000)
Under 1981A (Disability, Age, Retaliation) $300,000 Maximum Cap. Punitive Damages under 42 U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1).
Eligibility for punitive damages depends on the state of mind the leadership
were in, Kolstad v Am. Dental Ass’n, 527 US 526, 535 (1999).
HIPAA/Privacy Act (2 each) (2016 & 2018) $50,000 to $250,000 (3 time – 2016)
Willful Violation (KKK) 1983 of Title 42 of USC Code Jury is not entitled to place a monetary value on constitutional rights
violations of which was deprived/punitive damage
Married/Minority (non Federal Employee) $300,000 Separate Cause of Action/RICO
Son (non government entity) $300,000 A person who knowingly obtains or discloses
individually identifiable health information in violation
of the Privacy Rule may face a criminal penalty of up to
$50,000 and up to one-year imprisonment. The
criminal penalties increase to $100,000 and up to five
years imprisonment if the wrongful conduct involves
false pretenses, and to $250,000 and up to 10 years
imprisonment if the wrongful conduct involves the
intent to sell, transfer, or use identifiable health
information for commercial advantage, personal gain or
malicious harm. The Department of Justice is
responsible for criminal prosecutions under the Privacy
Act. We reserve the right to contact hospital to file
complaint and to file a complaint with the MD Medial
Board.
Attorney’s Fee/Representative ADA $80,000
Expert Fees (ADA) $30,000
Expert Fee (EEO) $10,000
Expert Fee (Medical) $10,000
ADA Rep (Theresa) $10,000
VA Doctor Falsifying Medical Record RICO (treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory
damages).
RICO Act: treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory
damages).
Tremble Damages: must allege (1) that the defendant received money from a pattern of
racketeering activity, (2) invested that money in an enterprise, (3) the enterprise affected interstate
commerce, and (4) an injury resulting from the investment of racketeering income distinct from an
injury caused by the predicate acts themselves.
65. .
• COA 3: Court
• Relief that would have been available had the matter been heard in court
(Cause of Action):
Hostile work environment based on:
(1) Retaliation (11 Jan 2018 & 18 Jan 2018) (*1981A =$300,000 Cap) However, $300,000
Maximum Cap. Punitive Damages under 42 U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1). Eligibility for punitive damages depends on the
state of mind the leadership were in, Kolstad v Am. Dental Ass’n, 527 US 526, 535 (1999).
(2) Age Discrimination, Disability, Emotional (*1981A)
(3) Race (Caucasian) Discrimination (Unlimited Cap)
(4) ADA 1990, Title I, II, III, V, and VII 1981 $300,000 Cap/ADA $55,000/110,000
(5) Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ($300,000)
Separate Cause of Action
(6) Married disabled veteran (nonfederal) Separate Cause of Action
KKK 1983 (Unlimited)
(7) Austin/ADA Protected nonfederal) Separate Cause of Action
KKK 1983 (Unlimited)
(8) Emotional Distress (Willful/Unlimitted)
5-10 Years
(9) Privacy Act/HIPPA Law (2016 & RA meeting) ($100,000 to $250,000)
(10) VA Doctor falsifying 2016/2018 documents
(11) RICO : Treble damages
(12) Multiple Press Conferences/Veteran Services Organization/Wounded Warrior
Game/Invictus Games
COA 3 RECAP
66. COA 1: Relief as per law
COA 2: Relief based on Retirement
COA 3: Court [VA, DOD and individual
capacity and media exposure]
COURSE OF ACTION (COA)
68. Items of Violations on EEO Report (Intro)
An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who believes that s/he has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin,
age or disabling condition. The Commission has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a
remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994); see also Wildberger v. Small Business Administration, EEOC Request No. 05960761 (October 8, 1998). An agency is required to
address EEO complaints only when filed by an individual who has suffered direct, personal deprivation at the hands of the employer; the agency's act must have caused some concrete effect on the aggrieved person's
employment status. Quinones v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05920051 (March 12, 1992).
The complaint of discrimination raises the following claim: Whether Complainant was subjected to a hostile work environment based on: (1) Retaliation, (2) age, (3) race
(Caucasian), (4) Discrimination based on his disability as a Service Disabled veteran and (4) being married to a minority service disabled veteran as evidenced by the following
Date Claim (Must State a
claim)
Action Responsible
Parties
Regulations Prohibited by Fine Comments
6 Dec 2016 Retaliation for ADA
representative
approaching boss about
the harassment and
unfair treatment ref:
telework and indefinite
phone duty.
2 weeks later, Rob
received bad Report
Card due to opposition
(3rd Party)
Boss ignores ADA Reps
request and calls team
meeting. In meeting
Kendrix allows co-
worker to harass Rob in
front of peers. Rob says
nothing. ADA rep
contacts Chief of Staff
and Deputy Bradey
Terrell. CoS insures
Reasonable
Accommodations
request starts (2018
Voncelle states on tape
this action was a
management deal.
What happened to Rob
before her time is not
her responsibility.
This starts the
interactive process/Rob
(Oct 2002 Enforcement
Guide). VA leads one to
believe the interactive
process starts when
they say it starts.
Rob receives RA
(Telework, ADA, Med
Appoints and Superv)
2016 VA Medical
Records (Dr Rashs- and
Nurse – Deb ).
Emails & Written
request.
VA
Director, Angela
Kendrix
Chief of Staff,
Mike Freul
Deputy Chief of
Staff Brandey
Terrell
VA HR Denise
Williams
VA Doctor
Rachsa (RA )
Nurse Deb Jou
(RA)
Candace and
Peers
EEO MGT Directive
1614.107
ADA Procedures
under Executive
Order 13164
requires all exe
branch federal
agencies institute
procedures for
processing RA
request under
Section 501 of the
Rehab Act of 1973
Oct 2002
Enforcement Guide
ADA 1990 , Title I, II, III, V,
& VII, Rehab Act of 1993,
Title VII, 501 and 505 of
the Rehab Act of 1973.
KKK, Title 42 USC 1983
Retaliation against Rob
due to ADA contacting
command
Racially harassed by peers
and supervisor
EEO law Sections 102 and
103 of the Civil Rights Act of
1991
1981A Cap $300,000.
$300,000 Maximum Cap.
However, Punitive Damages
under 42 U.S.C. & 1981
a(b)(1). Eligibility for punitive
damages depends on the
state of mind the leadership
were in, Kolstad v Am. Dental
Ass’n, 527 US 526, 535
(1999).
No limits on Race 1991 Race
Discrimination ($600,000)
and KKK/1983
No limits on Race
Discrimination or Under KKK
42 USC 1983
ADA Violation - $55,000 for
the first violation and
$110,000 there after.
Reserve the rights for
*RICO Claim -3 Xs
Interaction process
starts when asked.
Rehab Act of 1973
require Fed Agency
provide RA to indiv
unless cause undue
hardship
Race Discrimination
*Pattern of ongoing
discrimination
Agency must consider
at least as background
all relevant evidence
offered outside of 45
days
*NOTE: No undue delay
when Chief of Staff got
involved. Kendrix
forced to follow the
rules/offers mediation
ADA refuses. Wants her
to simply stop the
harassment.
2018 HR states packet
missing/ VA Doctor Fab
2016 Medial
Documents *RICO
**Robert becomes
protected under the
ADA Acts
The opposition clause of Title VII has an “expansive definition,” and “great deference” is given to the EEOC’s interpretation of opposing conduct. As the Supreme Court stated in Crawford v.
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, “‘[w]hen an employee communicates to her employer a belief that the employer has engaged in . . . a form of employment
69. Items of Violations on EEO Report (#1)
An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who believes that s/he has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition.
The Commission has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No.
05931049 (April 21, 1994); see also Wildberger v. Small Business Administration, EEOC Request No. 05960761 (October 8, 1998). An agency is required to address EEO complaints only when filed by an individual who has suffered direct, personal
deprivation at the hands of the employer; the agency's act must have caused some concrete effect on the aggrieved person's employment status. Quinones v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05920051 (March 12, 1992).
The complaint of discrimination raises the following claim: Whether Complainant was subjected to a hostile work environment based on: (1) Retaliation, (2) age, (3) race (Caucasian), (4)
Discrimination based on his disability as a Service Disabled veteran and (4) being married to a minority service disabled veteran as evidenced by the following
Date Claim (Must State a
claim)
Action Responsible
Parties
Regulations Prohibited by Fine Comments
27 Nov 2017 Time and Attendance
Abuse of Power
Supervisor gave leave
then took it back. Once
ADA rep sent an email,
Supervisor gave Robert
partial leave and then
invited ADA Rep to talk
(See Email)
Voncelle James
Angela Kendrix
EEO Manage
Directives EEO MD
110
Title I, II, VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, the
ADEA, Title V of the ADA,
Section 501 of the Rehab
Act (501), the EPA
ADA
KKK 42 USC 1983
Sec 501 of the Rehab Act
1973 prohibits
discrimination against
qualified individual with
disabilities with respect all
terms, conditions and
privileges of employment.
This law also require
covered employees to
make RA absent undue
hardship.
Title III, Public
Accommodations.
504 (Gov’t Programs and
activities)
EEO law Sections 102 and 103
of the Civil Rights Act of 1991
1981A Cap $300,000.
However,.Punitive Damages
under 42 U.S.C. & 1981
a(b)(1). Eligibility for punitive
damages depends on the
state of mind the leadership
were in, Kolstad v Am. Dental
Ass’n, 527 US 526, 535 (1999).
No limits on Race 1991 Race
Discrimination ($600,000)
and KKK/1983
No limits on Race
Discrimination or Under KKK
42 USC 1983
ADA Violation - $55,000 for
the first violation and
$110,000 there after.
Reserve the right for
*RICO Claim -3 Xs
Establishing a pattern.
Agency must consider at
least as background all
relevant evidence
offered outside of 45
days .
This was the time (if VJ
[really did not
coordinate with Angela
Kindrex located one
door away from her
office] should have
researched the status of
Robert as a supervisor
she has a responsibility
to learn.
70. Items of Violations on EEO Report (#2)
Date Claim Action Responsible
Parties
Regulations Prohibited by Fine Comments
Following Claim addresses the additional ADA prohibition of “interference” with the exercise of rights under the ADA. The interference provision goes beyond the retaliation prohibition to
make it also unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or otherwise interfere with an individual’s exercise of any right under the ADA, or with an individual who is assisting another to exercise
ADA rights.
11 Jan 2018 UNFAIR TREATMENT
FOR EXPRESS
OPPOSITION TO
DISCRIMINATORY
PRACTICE/REPRISAL
Interference with ADA
law
In response to VJ denial
email, the Complainant
questioned VJ unfair
discriminatory email
[treatment as he was
singled out].
VJ. Ignored the
complainant.
Voncelle
James
Angela
Kindrex
WITNESSES:
Candace,
Theresa Davis
EEOC Enforcement
Guidance on
Retaliation and
Related Issues 2016
REHAB ACT OF 1973, [501
and 505] UNFAIR
TREATMENT FOR EXPRESS
OPPOSITION TO
DISCRIMINATORY
PRACTICE/REPRISAL
Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 (Title VII), 5
the Age Discrimination,
Section 704(a) of Title VII,
42 U.S.C. § 2000e–3(a),
Title V of the Americans
with Disabilities Act
(ADA),7 Section 501 of the
Rehabilitation Act (Section
501),8 the Equal Pay Act
(EPA), 9 Section 4(d) of
the ADEA, 29 U.S.C. §
623(d),
Section 503 of the ADA,
42 U.S.C. § 12203
Retaliation: CAP $300,00
1990 ADA $55,000for the
initial Claim and $100,000.
Willful harassment
among VA employee
starts after 12 Jan
PROTECTED: The first question when analyzing a claim that a materially adverse action was retaliatory is whether there was an earlier complaint or other EEO activity that is protected by the law (known as “protected
activity”). Protected activity includes “participating” in an EEO process or “opposing” discrimination. These two types of protected activity arise directly from two distinct statutory retaliation clauses that differ in
scope. Participation in an EEO process is more narrowly defined to refer specifically to raising a claim, testifying, assisting or participating in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing under the EEO laws,
but it is very broadly protected. By contrast, opposition activity encompasses a broader range of activity by which an individual opposes any practice made unlawful by the EEO statutes. The protection for opposition
is limited, however, to those individuals who act with a reasonable good faith belief that a potential EEO violation exists and who act in a reasonable manner to oppose it.
Okoli v. City of Balt., 648 F.3d 216, 224 (4th Cir. 2011) (ruling that it was sufficient to constitute “opposition” that plaintiff complained about “harassment” and described some facts about the sexual behavior in the
workplace. EEOC v. Go Daddy Software, Inc., 581 F.3d 951, 964 (9th Cir. 2009) (holding that allegations need not have identified all incidents of the discriminatory behavior complained of to constitute opposition
because “a complaint about one or more of the comments is protected behavior”); Ogden v. Wax Works, Inc., 214 F.3d 999, 1007 (8th Cir. 2000) (ruling that reasonable jury could conclude plaintiff “opposed
discriminatory conduct” when she told her harasser, who was also her supervisor, to stop harassing her). 40 1 B. Lindemann, P. Grossman, & C. Weirich, Employment Discrimination Law 15–20 (5th ed. 2012)
71. Items of Violations on EEO Report (#3)
Date Claim (Must State a
claim)
Action Responsible
Parties
Regulations Prohibited by Fine Comments
PROTECTED: The first question when analyzing a claim that a materially adverse action was retaliatory is whether there was an earlier complaint or other EEO activity that is protected by the law (known as “protected
activity”). Protected activity includes “participating” in an EEO process or “opposing” discrimination. These two types of protected activity arise directly from two distinct statutory retaliation clauses that differ in
scope. Participation in an EEO process is more narrowly defined to refer specifically to raising a claim, testifying, assisting or participating in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing under the EEO laws,
but it is very broadly protected. By contrast, opposition activity encompasses a broader range of activity by which an individual opposes any practice made unlawful by the EEO statutes. The protection for opposition
is limited, however, to those individuals who act with a reasonable good faith belief that a potential EEO violation exists and who act in a reasonable manner to oppose it.
12 Jan 2018 Refusal to meet with
ADA Rep and Discuss
issue [Protected]
Complainants ask VJ for
HR representative’s
information due to 11
and 12 January incident
via email. VJ responds
to Complainant with HR
[Mr. Brown’s] email.
*This is significant
information because it
proves VJ knows
Complainant is
interested in filing an
EEO complaint.
*This action caused the
Complainant’s
disability to worsen as
the Supervisor failed to
resolve the issue
REPRISAL/ADA VIOLATION
VJ agrees to meet with
Complainant at 2:45.
However, when
complainant initiates ADA
protection rights, VJ denies
representation and cancels
the scheduled meeting:
(1) after the ADA
representative arrives
(2) and while supervisor,
Angela Kendrix watches
and
(3) in the presence of
Teresa Davis.
Supervisor Actions
constitutes intereferance in
violation od ADA
Voncelle
James
Angela
Kindrex
WITNESSES:
Candace,
Theresa Davis
Rob Questions
Authority/Superv.
Action via email that
denies.
PROTECTED: Whistle
Blower Protection Act. 5
USC &2302(b)(8)
Freedom of Reprisal: 29
CFR &1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil Rights
Act/aniti retaliation
provision/opposition
clause
1990 ADA Interference
Provision. ADA prohibits
interference with the
exercise or enjoyment of
ADA right Title 42 USC
1223(b)
Brown vs. City of Tucson,
336 F3d 1181 (9th Cir.
2003)
Supervisor can not violate:
Merit System Principles and
or the Personal Practice
Reprisal: $300,000 Cap
1981 A.
However,.Punitive Damages
under 42 U.S.C. & 1981
a(b)(1). Eligibility for punitive
damages depends on the
state of mind the leadership
were in, Kolstad v Am. Dental
Ass’n, 527 US 526, 535
(1999).
KKK, 1983 No Cap
ADA, $55,000 for the initial
violation and $110,000
Voncelle James
Angela Kendrix
17 and 18 Jan
2018
Unfair treatment for
express opposition to
discriminatory (3rd
Party)
ADA sends email to Kevin
Brown, HR and [General
Dunford] to informs them
EEO complaint will be
submitted due to 11 and 12
Jan issue and how she
made Rob feel . Ask for
protection.
Failed to protect Rob from
harassment. Informed VJ.
HR, Kevin
Brown
Voncelle
James
Angela
Kendrix
PROTECTED: Whistle
Blower Protection Act. 5
USC &2302(b)(8)
Freedom of Reprisal: 29
CFR &1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil Rights
Act/aniti retaliation
provision/opposition
clause
ADA Violation –
Interference
198 A, $300,000 Cap/Punitive
Damages
1981 Unlimited
1983, KKK Jury Unlimited
ADA Violation $55,000 first
violation, $100,000 there
after
RICO 3X
Voncelle James
Angela Kendrix
Reserve the right to file
RICO
72. Date Claim (Must State a
claim)
Action Responsible
Parties
Regulations Prohibited by Fine Comments
19 Jan VJ directs Rob to come to
her office and willfully
harasses him.
REPRISAL/ADA VIOLATION
Harssment
ADA Interference
VJ directs Robert to come to
her office and sit across from
her in an effort to remind
him who is boss. VJ directors
Robert to her about 11 and
12 Jan.
VJ calls Robert into her office
and orders him to speak to
her abut 11 and 12 Jan issue.
Robert refuses as VJ become
frustrated
Robert refuses as he informs
her that he reserves his right
not to say anything to her [as
there was an EEO complaint
filed against her]. VJ informs
Robert 4Xs to speak. Robert
reminds her that he was
there to listen and she will
talk to him in such a manner
when he knows his rights.
Voncelle
James
Angela
Kindrex
PROTECTED PROTECTED: Whistle Blower
Protection Act. 5 USC
&2302(b)(8)
Freedom of Reprisal: 29 CFR
&1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil Rights
Act/aniti retaliation
provision/opposition clause
1990 ADA Interference
Provision. ADA prohibits
interference with the
exercise or enjoyment of
ADA right Title 42 USC
1223(b)
Brown vs. City of Tucson,
336 F3d 1181 (9th Cir. 2003)
Supervisor can not violate:
Merit System Principles and or
the Personal Practice
Reprisal: $300,000 Cap
1981 A.
However,.Punitive Damages
under 42 U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1).
Eligibility for punitive damages
depends on the state of mind
the leadership were in, Kolstad
v Am. Dental Ass’n, 527 US
526, 535 (1999).
KKK, 1983 No Cap
ADA, $55,000 for the initial
violation and $110,000
Voncelle James knows willfully violates the ADA
law without fear.
24 Jan 2018 VJ and Angela Kendrix
coordinates with Melvin
Garrett to investigate
Robert with internal
investigation
Melvin Gerrett coordinates
an interagency investigation
with Robert which is be
design to intimidate and
oppress him.
Melvin Gerrett
Voncelle
James
Angela
Kendrix
PROTECTED: Whistle Blower
Protection Act. 5 USC
&2302(b)(8)
Freedom of Reprisal: 29 CFR
&1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil Rights
Act/aniti retaliation
provision/opposition clause
Reprisal: $300,000 Cap
1981 A.
However,.Punitive Damages
under 42 U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1).
Eligibility for punitive damages
depends on the state of mind
the leadership were in, Kolstad
v Am. Dental Ass’n, 527 US
526, 535 (1999).
KKK, 1983 No Cap
ADA, $55,000 for the initial
violation and $110,000
Warned Melvin that retaliation and harassment
were against the law.
73. Date Claim (Must State a
claim)
Action Responsible
Parties
Regulations Prohibited by Fine Comments
30 Jan 2018 Willful Harrssment Melvin Gerrett met with
Robert in person in his
office to harass him. Had
him sign the same
documents that was
previously signed and
remind him he could be
held accountable for not
cooperating in the VOID
investigation
Melvin Gettett PROTECTED ADA/Reprisial Reprisal: $300,000 Cap
1981 A.
However,.Punitive Damages
under 42 U.S.C. & 1981
a(b)(1). Eligibility for punitive
damages depends on the
state of mind the leadership
were in, Kolstad v Am. Dental
Ass’n, 527 US 526, 535
(1999).
KKK, 1983 No Cap. ADA,
$55,000 for the initial
violation and $110,000
Willful harassment.
Melvin Gerrette called
a fake meeting and
informed both Rob
and Sue that they
would receive a copy
of the final
investigation. As of
date, no report. He
wasted both our
times.
31 Jan 2018 Supervisor gives Robert
a void Letter of
Reprimand
VJ knows she is not
authorized to give Robert a
letter of reprimand as she is
not a director. According to
HR and VA rules, one must
be a director, provide a
warning first and etc.
Voncelle James
and
HR Karen Agee
PROETCTED Interference of ADA Reprisal: $300,000 Cap
1981 A.
However,.Punitive Damages
under 42 U.S.C. & 1981
a(b)(1). Eligibility for punitive
damages depends on the
state of mind the leadership
were in, Kolstad v Am. Dental
Ass’n, 527 US 526, 535
(1999).
KKK, 1983 No Cap. ADA,
$55,000 for the initial
violation and $110,000
Willful Harassment
2 Feb 2018 ADA Rep Contacts HR
and attempts to call
EEOC Rep, French
Bryant and report
retaliation.
Fraud waste and abuse of
tax payers funds. VJ is not
rained and willfully
harassing Robert.
Brown informs ADA that he
violated the privacy act and
lost Robert’s ADA records,
therefore we need to
reassemble his ADA
records.
Kenvin Brown,
informs Bozgoz
that Gary is French
Bryant’s boss.
Conact Gary and
report EEOC
Protect Privacy Act
ADA Violation
Privacy Act ADA representative
attempting to get
Robert out of the toxic
area. Contact VA
Doctor Rasha and
inform her to resend
VA Robert 2016 RA.
Dr Rasha ignores
request.
6 Feb 2018 Reprisal/ADA Complaint filed against
VJ for issuing void letter
of reprimands.
Voncelle denies it (policy
needs to change here.
Voncelle James ADA Interference KKK Ac 1983 NO Cap Willful abuse.
Fraud, waste and
abuse of taxpayers
money.
74. Date Claim Action Responsible
Parties
Prohibited by Fine Comments
15 Feb 2018 Reprisal/ADA
Fraud waste and abuse of
power and tax payers
money [lack of training].
ORM informs ADA Rep VJ
wants to mediate but
refuses to remove the
void letter of reprimand
from Robs personal file.
Problem:
Congress give appropriate
funds to:
HR, VJ and ORM. If the VA
policy states VJ needs to
be trained why are people
in leadership allowing her
to run wild and play with
lives?
ORM informs ADA Rep the
VJ refused to remove Void
order and if we mediate,
they wont remove
reprimand.
ADA request VJ
recognizes.
Neg Response
VJ
Angela
Kendrix
French Bryant
Kevin Brown
Karen Agee
Congress. Fraud waste and
abuse
ADA Interference .
Clear policies, rules, and
regulations are being
broken.
Interfere with ADA
Supervisor can not violate:
Merit System Principles and or the
Personal Practice
Reprisal: $300,000 Cap
1981 A.
However, Punitive Damages under 42
U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1). Eligibility for
punitive damages depends on the state
of mind the leadership were in, Kolstad v
Am. Dental Ass’n, 527 US 526, 535
(1999).
KKK, 1983 No Cap
ADA, $55,000 for the initial violation and
$110,000
Start questioning VA’s
practices.
16 Feb, 2018 Interference of ADA
rights.
Retaliation (3rd Party).
Punishes Robert by calling
him into her office again.
Ignores RA
Abuse of authority and
lack of training.
Voncelle James calls
Robert into her office, ask
him to locate the original
Letter of Reprimand. They
ask him to sign her the
grievance which she
denied.
VJ
Angela
Kendrix
Rehab Act of 1973 [501 and
505]
PROTECTED: Whistle Blower
Protection Act. 5 USC
&2302(b)(8)
Freedom of Reprisal: 29 CFR
&1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil Rights
Act/aniti retaliation
provision/opposition clause
Reprisal: $300,000 Cap
1981 A.
However, Punitive Damages under 42
U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1). Eligibility for
punitive damages depends on the state
of mind the leadership were in, Kolstad v
Am. Dental Ass’n, 527 US 526, 535
(1999).
KKK, 1983 No Cap
ADA, $55,000 for the initial violation and
$110,000
VJ calls Robert in again
without ADA rep.
19 Feb, 2018 Unfair treatment due to
express opposition to
discrimination
practice/reprisal on third
party.
Fraud waste and abuse
ADA calls Chief of Staff,
Under Sec and Deputy
and Demand that they
investigate VJ and her
willful Federal law
violations.
Called Secretary, Chrystal
Brooks. Left a message
(emergency). Chrystal said
the Chief was in a meeting
and he might call back.
Chief never called. Called
Under Sec and Sec
Sec
Under Sec
Chief
Deputy
Chrystal
Brooks
Rehab Act of 1973 [501 and
505]
PROTECTED: Whistle Blower
Protection Act. 5 USC
&2302(b)(8)
Freedom of Reprisal: 29 CFR
&1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil Rights
Act/aniti retaliation
provision/opposition clause
Reprisal: $300,000 Cap
1981 A.
However, Punitive Damages under 42
U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1). Eligibility for
punitive damages depends on the state
of mind the leadership were in, Kolstad v
Am. Dental Ass’n, 527 US 526, 535
(1999).
KKK, 1983 No Cap
ADA, $55,000 for the initial violation and
$110,000
Under Sec
Chief of Staff, Frueh
Assist Chief of Staff, Terrell
Voncelle
Angela
75. Date Claim Action Responsible Party Prohibited by Fine Comments
20 Feb 2018 Retaliation
from Under
Sec
Under Sec
request more
information for
Robert then
stops!
Direction of
Duty
Under Sec PROTECTED: Whistle Blower
Protection Act. 5 USC &2302(b)(8)
Freedom of Reprisal: 29 CFR
&1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act/aniti
retaliation provision/opposition
clause
Supervisor can not
violate:
Merit System
Principles and or the
Personal Practice
Reprisal: $300,000 Cap
1981 A.
Punitive Damages
under 42 U.S.C. & 1981
a(b)(1). Eligibility for
punitive damages
KKK, 1983 No Cap
21 Feb 2018 ADA
interference
and
Retaliation
HR refuses to
find 2016
document. ADA
rep assembles
suppl
documents
VJ
Angela Kendrix
Kevin Brown
1981 A.
Punitive Damages
under 42 U.S.C. & 1981
a(b)(1). Eligibility for
punitive damages
KKK, 1983 No Cap
21 Feb 2018 ADA
Interference
VA Doctor Fab
RA
ADA fires VA
Doctor for
fabricating
medical Records
VA Doctor Privacy Act Punitive Damages
under 42 U.S.C. & 1981
a(b)(1). Eligibility for
punitive damages
KKK, 1983 No Cap
21 Feb 2018 ADA
interference
and
retaliation
Stress taking toll
on
Austin/Breaks
down/Dr called
VA & Command
Kevin Brown
VJ
Angela Kendrix
New Doctors assist Rob as the stress
has affected his family.
Doctor
1981A Cap $300,000
RICO ACT (3Xs)
KKK 1983
22 Feb 2018 Retaliation HR refuses to
expedite RA/File
FMLA to protect
Rob from area
HR
VJ
Angela Kendrix
EEO Counselor provides his example
of EEO complaint. Bozgoz updates it
afert 2nd day and sends to command
and EEO rep. Everyone ignores the
complaint
1981A Cap $300,000
RICO ACT (3Xs)
KKK 1983
22 Feb 2018 Reach out to
General
Dunford,
Shadley and
Honore
VA/HR
VJ and Angela kendrix
Rehabilitation Act/Undue Delay $300,000 Punitive
Damages under 42
U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1).
Eligibility for punitive
damages
KKK, 1983 No Cap
76. Date Claim Action Responsible Party Prohibited by Fine Comments
March 2018 Retaliation Rob returns from
FMLA and VJ calls
him into her office
and refuses ADA
rep. ADA rep finds
Theresa to act as
ADA rep
VJ
Kevin Brown
Karen Agees
Freedom of Reprisal: 29 CFR
&1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act/aniti
retaliation provision/opposition
clause
PROTECTED: Whistle
Blower Protection Act.
5 USC &2302(b)(8)
Freedom of Reprisal:
29 CFR &1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil
Rights Act/aniti
retaliation
provision/opposition
clause
Son and Wife’s PTSD is triggered.
Doctor Price inform the Bozgozes
that if she thought VA was going to
harass him she would not have
sent him back to work. She
updated his FMLA documents for a
year and said VA’s work area is
toxic with VJ. She recommends
that he stay away as their goal is to
break him without regards.
March 2018 ADA
interference
Attend RA meeting
with VA HR Superv,
Karen Agee and
Kevin Brown
HR wanted us to
tell the doctor to
redo RA and take
out harassment.
VA Freedom of Reprisal: 29 CFR
&1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act/aniti
retaliation provision/opposition
clause
Reprisal: $300,000 Cap
1981 A.
Damages under 42
U.S.C. & 1981 a(b)(1).
Eligibility for punitive
damages depends on
the state of mind the
leadership were in,
Kolstad v Am. Dental
Ass’n, 527 US 526, 535
(1999).
Once HR Supervisor left to
meeting. Kevin Brown informed
ADA that higher is involved in our
process and to be nice and I might
get what Robert wants.
ADA rep informed HR rep to do his
job and stop wasting tax payers
money.
March 2018 ADA
interference
and
retaliation
ADA Rep ask for RA
update. VA refuses
to update. VA
wants doctor to
change
VA & Command
Kevin Brown
VJ
Angela Kendrix
PROTECTED: Whistle
Blower Protection Act.
5 USC &2302(b)(8)
Freedom of Reprisal:
29 CFR &1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil
Rights Act/aniti
retaliation
provision/opposition
clause
VA wants Doctor price to redo her
paper work to erase what she
wrote on the FMLA document and
RA document. Dr Price is concen.
Ask Robert to consider leaving VA.
29 Mar 2018 Mr. Burke request interested in
mediation. Mediation coordinate for
24 April then cancelled by VA after
team assembled
Mr. Burke Mediation Schedule for 24 April
team prepares and 3 days before
the meeting, VA cancels meeing.
77. Date Claim Action Responsible Party Prohibited by Fine Comments
April 2018 Retaliation Rob returns from
FMLA and VJ calls
him into her office
and refuses ADA
rep. ADA rep finds
Theresa to act as
ADA rep
VJ
Kevin Brown
Karen Agees
Freedom of Reprisal: 29 CFR
&1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act/aniti
retaliation provision/opposition
clause
PROTECTED: Whistle
Blower Protection Act.
5 USC &2302(b)(8)
Freedom of Reprisal:
29 CFR &1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil
Rights Act/aniti
retaliation
provision/opposition
clause
Son and Wife’s PTSD is triggered.
Doctor Price inform the Bozgozes
that if she thought VA was going to
harass him she would not have
sent him back to work. She
updated his FMLA documents for a
year and said VA’s work area is
toxic with VJ. She recommends
that he stay away as their goal is to
break him without regards.
April 2018 RA Meeting
with ADA
interference
Undue delay
Taped VJ and Chris
in meeting giving
wrong information.
VJ is the trigger but
Chris W
V/J
April 2018 Privacy Act
Violation
ADA Rep provided
2016 Medical
Documents to Chris
to add to his files.
Chris leave
documents on
table after General
Shadley askes him
and VJ to do the
right thing by
focusing on the
victim.
Chris Privacy Act $250,000 and 5 years
in prison
April 2018 Undue Delay
Of Reasonable Accommodations.
After the RA meeting, VJ disregarded
the doctors advise and made RA that
was not effective.
As of date, Rob is staying home on
FMLA as per doctors orders.
VJ
Chris
ADA interference PROTECTED: Whistle
Blower Protection Act.
5 USC &2302(b)(8)
Freedom of Reprisal:
29 CFR &1614.101(b)
Title 7 of the Civil
Rights Act/aniti
retaliation
provision/opposition
clause
ADA
VJ has made this personal.
78. SCREENING
CRITERIA
• Each Claim must be
proven to cause harm. If
this can be done, it has
standing in court and relief
is due
• The answer is yes or no
• The screening criteria
must tie back to the facts
79. .
SURVIVING COAs
COA 1 (Relief as per law )
COA 2 (Relief based on
Retirement)
COA 3 (Court [VA, DOD and
individual capacity] and
exposure)
80. EVALUATION
CRITERIA
#1
• Short Title: RELIEF AS
PER LAW
• Definition: THE TOTAL
COST REQUIRED TO Relief
that would have been
available had the matter
been heard in court as per
employment arbitration
rules/mediation
procedures.
• Unit of Measure:
MEASURED IN DOLLARS
• Benchmark: What ever
can be proven
• Formula: MORE IS
BETER
• WEIGHT: 5.20
81. EVALUATION
CRITERIA
#2
• Short Title: PUBLIC
TRUST
• Definition: What was
briefed to Congress vs.
Reality
• Unit of Measure:
MEASURED WHAT CAN BE
PROVEN REF:
REGULATIONS VIOLATIONS
• Benchmark: VOID
ACTIONS
• Formula: LESS IS
BETTER
• WEIGHT: 12
82. EVALUATION
CRITERIA
#3
• Short Title: RELIEF AS
PER RETIREMENT
• Definition: THE TOTAL
COST OF BOZGOZED
HEALTH as per Empirical
Data, OSHA and Doctors
guidance
• Unit of Measure:
MEASURED IN DOLLARS
• Benchmark: State of
mind/Emotional Health
• Formula: MORE IS
BETER
• WEIGHT: 10
83. WHAT MAKES
GOOD
CRITERIA
Based on Federal Law
•Preference is for objective numerical count
•Compare COA to standard, SOPS, REGULATIONS – not COAs against each
other
•Established SOP or doctrine based
Measurable Standard
•Cost, time, speed, distance, span of control, flexibility, emotional stress
caused to family etc.
Evaluates quality of COA
•Reasoning – leader applies personal experience, training, public interest
•Historical Data – based on what has been known to happen
•Current Allocation – existing conditions
•Averaging – mathematical average of remaining COAs - least preferred
method
Benchmark must be based in
84. ANALYSIS OF
COA#1
VA SLIDE
• ADVANTAGES
• Cost: $____________
• Emotional Harassment for
Robert, Sue and Austin Stops
• Damage [indirectly and
directly] Stops
• Everyone moves forward
• VA gets training and
opportunity to repair the
issues.
• DISADVANTAGES
• Robert will continue to
work inspite of doctor’s
advice
• Prison time for violations
85. ANALYSIS OF
COA#2
VA SLIDE
• ADVANTAGES
• Cost: $____________
• Emotional Harassment
for Robert, Sue and Austin
Stops
• Damage Stops
• Everyone moves forward
• VA gets training VA gets
training and opportunity to
repair the issues.
• DISADVANTAGES
• Win/Win
86. ANALYSIS OF
COA#3
VA SLIDE
• ADVANTAGES
• Cost: $____________
• Emotional Harassment
for Robert, Sue and Austin
Stops
• Damage Stops
• Everyone moves forward
• VA gets training
• DISADVANTAGES
• Media Attention
• Public Trust Violations
• More fines,
imprisonment, longer time
88. CONCLUSION
• COA 2 - is a win-win. Although it is more expensive this
entire journey would allow everyone to move forward. The
damage is done and a solution has been offered so this does
not happen again.
• COA 3 –Public Trust issue is brought to light and All
members [DOD and VA] must answer.
90. • On 9 May 2018, VA’s attorney, Judy Valois informed us that
VA decided not to settle as they needed more time [to
retaliate]. Over 200 acceptable civil rights violations are
found in the transmittal record and over 200 civil rights
violations are found in district court as they continue to
retaliate, gaslight and violate our rights against the WESTFALL
ACT. BLUF: DOJ could not touch our case. Their goal is to not
give us relief, put us in jail using fake peace orders, pawns,
courts and etc. See DOJ’s fake response. Note the 9 fake
claims that DOJ and Judge Amy B. Jackson obtained from the
transmittal record. This means they always knew the truth
and abused us for the hell of it.
91. Prohibited
Personnel
Practices
• Those things a Federal employee with personnel authority
may not do. A federal employee has personnel authority if
they can take, direct others to take, recommend, or
approve any personnel action. This includes
appointments, or any decisions concerning pay, benefits,
and training.
• People with personnel authority- managers and
supervisors –are charged with avoiding prohibited
personnel practices
• Prohibited Personnel Practices are:
• Illegally discriminate for or against any employee
• Solicit or consider improper employment
recommendation
• Coerce an employee’s political activity
• Obstruct a person’s right to compete for employment
• Influence any person to withdraw from competition
• Give unauthorized preference or improper advantage
92. Prohibited
Personnel
Practices
(Continued)
• Employ or promote a relative
• Retaliate against a whistleblower
• Retaliate against employees or applicants for filing an
appeal
• Unlawfully discriminate for off duty conduct
• Knowing violate veteran’s preference requirements
• Violate any law, rule or regulation which implements or
directly concerns the merit principle.
93. Title 29 of the Code of Fed Reg guarantees
freedom of reprisal
Individual must show the
elements of proof that must
be stablished for a claim of
whistleblower reprisal.
First the individual must
show that the information
they provided falls under the
categories of disclosure that
are protected under 5 US
Code 2302
Second- the individual must
show that a personnel action
was taken, not taken, or was
threatened as a result of the
disclosure.
Third- the individual must
show they had actual or
constructive knowledge of
the protected disclosure.
And Fourth- the individual
must show that the
protected disclosure was a
contributing factor in the
personnel action.
94. Title 7 of the
Civil Rights Act
• Unlawful to discriminate against an individual because he
or she has opposed any practice that has been made
unlawful
• A complain amounts to protected opposition only if an
individual explicitly or implicitly communicates a belief that
the practice constitutes unlawful employment
discrimination
• Title 7 anti-retaliation provision’s opposition clause makes
it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against any
employee because he or she has opposed any practice
made unlawful
• The opposition clause does not require the individual be
correct in their belief that the agency’s employment
practice they opposed actually was unlawful. The
opposition clause protects the individual provided that
they had a good faith and reasonable belief that a violation
of the EEO statutes had or was occurring.
95. •Reoccurring Issues (Human Rights Violations)
• Issue has become personal
•It is designed to willfully harm vs. heal
•Reasonable person (e.g., General Shadley, General
Honore, General Dunford & Staff, Robert’s doctors, and
the public, congress) would say, “If VA is doing this to their
own service-disabled veterans & employees, who else are they
doing this to? (1) other veterans, Theresa D., Candace, Theresa M.,
Kim, Leah B. [conduct command climate] and etc).
•Contradicts what VA announces to congress and in
the news.
ASSUMPTIONS Bearing on the Facts
96. Know who you are dealing with- We
went to the supreme court and baby
clerks signed orders
97.
98. Reoccurring issue across the board or “THE DEEP STATE’s GAME is alteration of
records 18 USC 1506 violation without fear.
We discovered that everyone (e.g., judges, sheriff’s department, attorneys, clerks, prosecutors, ADA Clerks and
etc) has/have no problem lying on government documents until everyone is in CRIMINAL COURT.
Once is in the CRIMINAL COURT ROOM THE PLAINTIFF MUST SHOW SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION/
SUFFICIENCY OF PLEADING BUT they can’t.
THEREFORE, the criminal judge, prosecutor and etc attempts to lie, gaslight and or throw out the case. NOTE:
THE JUDGE does not give an order or does not signed the void order.
Concern: THE DAYS YOU SPEND PAYING FOR JUSTICE, CLEARING YOUR
NAME OFF PUBLIC RECORD, FUNERAL MISSED and etc lost, nobody is
held accountable.
101. The games the
courts play when
they don’t establish
Subject Matter
Jurisdiction – Pay
attention to detail
102. Example of how the courts play
Americans and dont establish SMJ [using
our real time RICO/Crimes Against
Humanity case]
(a) Aunty Evalani Yockman and Washington State
(b) Sue and Robert VS VA/DC/MD
(c) Jeff Blochowicz
(d) Luanne and Lee’s Hillsborough/Tampa, FL
(d) Brad vs Hillsborough/Tampa, FL
(e) Darryl Brooks
104. Background
My ADA Client, Aunty Nana was a passenger in a para-trans. The driver did not buckle her into her
wheelchair. The driver sped, turned the corner and My Auny Nana flew out of her wheelchair and
broke her neck. The driver refused to take her to the fire department or hospital until they arrived at
her house. She convinced the driver to call her daughter and his boss. He took her to the hospital.
Left her in the parking lot for dead. My aunt never walked against, never returned home again and
later died. When we went to court, the Judge and Zurich’s attorneys tried to fake SMJ.
105. CASE #1 Aunty
Evalani
Yockman and
Washington
State
The Judge and Clerks did the following to pretend SMJ/Sufficiency of Pleading:
(1) Coordinated court via phone. I was on phone in Maryland as an ADA Rep for my
cousin everyone else (e.g., Judge, Clerks, Defendant s: Zurich and Para-trans drive
and Zurich’s attorneys (Leslie and her Boss) would be in court.
(2) To protect our interest, I had my family in Washington State show up. I did not tell
the court that they was coming. When Zurich’s attorneys saw the family, they ran out
of the courtroom with their phones.
(3) Once the court started, I announced on the phone that I was present. The Judge
recorded my voice then hung up the phone on me. Once this happened, TREASON IS
HAPPENING.
(4) The Attorney testified for Zurich and the Paratrans driver. (Attorneys never testify)
(5) The Judge then told my cousin and family that he does not make the laws and he had
to dismiss my Aunty Nana’s 1983 KKK, ADA Violation and Wrongful Death case
against Zurich.
(6) The Judge then (1) Signed a void order as if I was really there in court, (2) told me to
pay for Zurich attorney’s time, (3) had an ex parte meeting and lied on a false order
which meant we had two order. On the second order the Judge said my cousin and I
were there in the courtroom with the defendant and SMJ had been established.
(7) I paid for a reconsideration hearing and protested his void order. The judge said he
did not care while Zurich’s attorney (LESLIE) ran in the hallway once she saw in court.
(8) Once we received the court tape, we discovered it was erased ref: When the Judge
said, “I don’t care how many times you give me past precedence, I am going to deny
her case every time.
(9) When I took it higher the court of appeals and district court took my money and
played the delay, deny, wait until you die game.
106. Proof of fraud, waste and abuse and
TREASON in Washington, STATE Courts
(STATE, DISTRICT AND COURT OF
APPEALS)
114. This is the minute order the Judge, Clerk and Zurich fabricated
115. Issue:
Face of the order is wrong.
(1) The defendants were not
present.
(2) SMJ was not established,
therefore the Judge did
not have authority to
dismiss it.
(3) This was a second order
not signed.
(4) The clerk did not sign the
order or stamp it
(5) This is a minute fake
order
(6) The judge is not allowed
to dismiss a 1983 KKK case
when relief is due
116.
117. Issue: The judge dismiss the case
because he said I was not an attorney.
118. Proof I had a
right to
represent my
Aunty Nana’s
case provided to
Zurich and the
courts
131. When Subject Matter Jurisdiction is challenged, the person who submitted the motion to
dismiss the 1983 KKK, ADA violation, and wrongful death case must prove SMJ.
Think of a table: 4 things need to be in the courtroom when SMJ is challenged (2 legs- opposing
parties, (1 leg) competent fact witness, (1 leg) SMJ/why are you there? Why do they want to
dismiss a wrongful death, 1983 KKK with merit and etc?
Issue:
(1) Defendant was not in the court room (Zurich and the para-trans driver). However, my family and Nalanie were.
(2) The Plaintiffs (ADA Representative). They allowed me to state my name before they hung up the phone. They
later signed my name as if I agreed to the fake order.
(3) Competent fact witness (para-trans driver and Aunty Nana). My Aunty Nana is dead and the driver or Zurich did
not appear
(4) Zurich’s Attorney Lesley testified. Attorneys cannot testify in court EVER. Why? Because they lie.
(5) They (Lesley) said she wanted to dismiss the case because I was an ADA Advocate vs an Attorney.
(6) Clerks lie and alter records
(7) They use bailiffs to try to intimidate you, journalist and etc
(8) Spent thousands of dollars ref: Reconsideration hearing, administrative trickery, issuing summons, Court of
Appeal, District Court and etc. All of them are covering for each other. They take your money and alter records,
electronic filings and lie, cheat and steal.
132. CASE #2 Sue, Austin and Robert’s case,
DC, MD and at the VA HQ
133. Background
Robert filed an EEOC complaint at VA HQ in Washington, DC. During the process, we found fraud, waste abuse at every
turn in the EEOC process. We refused to have ORM touch the EEOC investigation and requested outside support, POST
OFFICE, Dr. Kline and Gail Leary. During the Post Office EEOC investigation, learned that VA hired the Post Office and the
EEOC Judge to fake the EEOC investigation while VA retaliated against Robert. VA went into our medical records and
exacerbated Robert’s condition, denied RA FMLA leave, denied an OSHA investigate, denied Robert’s board-certified
doctors order and ordered Robert back to work on 18 Jun on 14 Aug Robert suffered a stroke. They quickly tried to pad
his files with fake letter of reprimand, 5 days suspension for them (Voncelle James) causing the stroke, denied Robert’s
benefits, Denied my PTSD claim until I fronted them ref: going into my family’s records under the name of Cindy Boyd.
While Robert recovered from his stroke, Austin and I filed in district court under the zone of interest. We requested ADA
Reasonable Accommodation from Judge Amy B. Jackson on 29 Jan 2019. We wanted the case expedite because we won
our EEOC case in May 2018, however, VA (attorneys in building 810 and Second HQ’s VA rep, Judy Valois from Sarasota,
FL, said they could not settle [in May] because they were not done abusing us yet. We could prove over 200 claims
(Human rights violation found in transmittal record).
Because of the Westfall Act the Attorneys in building 810 flew Judy Valois for mediation. They had their team and I we
had our team. Once VA said, they were not settling, we asked District court to settle as we knew no attorney could
touch our case. However, Judge Amy B. Jackson (1) Ignored RA, (2) Allowed DOJ Fred Haynes go into our records and
deny RA, (3) Had her clerk our house and tell us not to issue the summons until VA ordered Robert back to work so they
could fire him, (4) set us up using Voncelle James, (5) Sheriff’s Department, (6) Fake peace order, (7) MD Courts (state,
de novo, and criminal court), (8) prosecutors, and other agencies, (9) DOJ, (10) Judge Randolph Moss and etc. During
fake criminal court Voncelle James appeared in Court. Both Prosecutors informed us that they knew nothing about our
case while Judge Rand Gaslit us and the Attorneys in Building 810 screamed, OH FUCK. Why? Because they are busted.
They cannot establish SMJ.
134. CASE #2 Sue, Austin and Robert’s Case ref: SMJ
The Judge, Prosecutor and Clerks did the following to pretend SMJ/Sufficiency of Pleading:
(1) Said oh shit because we appeared in court to prove everyone was involved a RICO/ 18 USC
1341 crime to include the Criminal Judge, Prosecutor and etc.
(2) Judge Rand and the Prosecutor had the nerve to play us thinking we did not know our
rights. We played along so we could capture everyone on tape as we were setting them up.
They did the following:
(3) Wasted tax dollars
(4) Denied ADA Reasonable Accommodations
(5) The Prosecutors told us that they knew nothing about our case
(6) Judge Rand got PTSD and was rude by:
(1) Ignoring our ADA Advocate, Christopher King
(2) Ordered Robert not to issue Voncelle James any motions and etc
(3) Issued a fake unsigned order
(4) Did not or could not establish SMJ because…
135. Why VA Attorneys, VA Leaders and
Pawn Vocelle James could not establish
SMJ/Sufficiency of pleading
136. In order to establish SMJ 4 things need to be in the
court room.
1. Plaintiff: Voncelle James
2. Defendant: Robert
3. Competent Fact Witness: Christopher King (Our ADA Advocate, Attorney and Journalist)
4. Reason why we were there: Voncelle James said on the record that DOJ, Attorneys in building 810 and Amy Jackson needed the
fake peace order to help her should our higher court case against them goes to trial, However, Voncelle James perjured herself
on the fake police report, fake peace order and fake criminal records. On her perjured documents VJ said the following:
a) POLICE REPORT dated 6 Jun 2019: Robert was dangerous and came to her house stating, “I AM GOING TO GET YOU”.
b) PEACE ORDER dated 6 Jun 2019: Robert and I were (1) stalkers, (2) ex-employees who came to her house with weapons in
our car. NOTE: VJ also stated on her peace order that we were issuing a summons
c) CRIMINAL Report dated 9 June: In order to get us into criminal court, VJ stated we were criminals because we violated the
6 June void peace order. She took Christopher King’s Whistleblower video and said we were guilty because we were
associated with Christopher King. Voncelle James also use a Workers Compensation ADA Confidential Medical Email stating
Robert is guilty because he cc’d her on the email
• .
137. Issue with VA, VA Leaders and Voncelle establishing SMJ
using perjured document during criminal court
1. Everyone is involved (RICO, 18 USC 1341 and 42 USC 1986 violation) as we told everyone to stop before we
went to Kangaroo Court. Everyone knew VJ had perjured herself and did not/could not win in fake criminal
court using perjured documents. Furthermore, everyone knew we paid for a DE NOVO hearing in Sep. At
the De novo hearing, Judge Dwyer told everyone in court that Voncelle James fake peace order goes away.
Therefore, she could not take us to criminal court in November.
a) VJ POLICE REPORT dated 6 Jun 2019: Robert was dangerous and came to her house stating, “I AM GOING TO GET
YOU”. We have the truth on the record. This proves VJ is a liar with the support of VA leaders, Attorneys in Building
810 and MD court. This is a RICO, 42 USC 1342, 18 USC 241, 242, 1983 KKK, 18 USC 1506, 42 USC 1985, 42 USC
1986 and etc.
b) VJ PEACE ORDER dated 6 Jun 2019: Robert and I were (1) stalkers, (2) ex-employees who came to her house with
weapons in our car. NOTE: VJ also stated on her peace order that we were issuing a summons. This significant
because you cannot give a peace order to anyone who is doing anything legal. Also Robert and I are ADA Advocates,
it is a felony to retaliated against ADA Advocates. Furthermore, VJ stated on the record that DOJ, the Attorneys in
Building 810 told her that she needed the peace order to dismiss our higher court case against them which is
another crime.
c) JV CRIMINAL Report dated 9 June: In order to get us into FAKE KANGAROO CRIMINLAL COURT VJ stated we were
criminals because we violated the 6 June void peace order. Voncele James took Christopher King’s Whistleblower
video and said we were guilty because we were associated with Christopher King. Voncelle James also use a
Workers Compensation ADA Confidential Medical Email stating Robert is guilty because he cc’d her on the email.
138. Comments ref Case #2: Case #2 shows illegal retaliation. This
is a recurring issue with the Justice System, VA, DOJ,
Attorneys, Prosecutors, Judges, ADA Court Clerks,
Commissioners, setting Americans, Whistleblowers and etc
up.
Issue: If you don’t know how to protect yourself against these
criminals, you WILL go to jail as their goal is to discredit the
whistleblower on public record.
140. Background
Jeff is a GS11 Nurse and whistleblower who discovered VA Leaders in AUGUSTA, GA had a 7.3 million
slush fund. They (VA LEADERS) were stealing from dead veterans and dead VA doctors. When Jeff
reported this crime, VA Leaders and Attorneys set Jeff up. They said Jeff had killed a Veteran who was in
the hospital. Jeff went through a DAB and was found innocent.
Once Jeff was found innocent, the Augusta Sheriff’s Deputies entered a Federal Building and arrested Jeff
for the same issue. The Augusta Sheriff’s Deputies put Jeff in jail, then hired 2 inmates to beat Jeff up.
NOTE: Jeff is on the DARPA super soldier program, therefore, Jeff harmed these men.
To punish Jeff further, the Augusta, GA court, Jeff’s Attorney which VA paid, prosecutor, and Judge
required Jeff to report to court every month for 6 years without giving Jeff an order.
When Robert and I visited Jeff during his hearing in Jan, we discovered SMJ was not established and the
Judge, States Attorney, Jeff’s Attorney and the Prosecutor were playing Kangaroo court. The prosecutor or
the defendant were not present in the courtroom. The states attorney, Judge and Jeff’s attorneys were
playing. NOTE: Attorneys cannot testiy.
142. Why Augusta GA Judge, Prosecutor and
Jeff’s attorney could not establish
SMJ/Sufficiency of pleading
143. In order to
establish SMJ
4 things need
to be in the
court room.
1. Plaintiff: Not present (VA) Prosecutor was also not
present. GA State’s attorney was allowed to testify for
the Plaintiff.
2. Defendant: Jeff.
3. Competent fact Witness: VA not present NOTE: Jeff was
found innocent in a DAB but was forced to go to fake
Kangaroo Court
4. Reason why Jeff was there: Retaliation. Jeff was led to
believe that he had to attend court every month,
otherwise they would arrest him.
144. Solution: Quo Warranto
The Quo Warranto forced the Judges in GA to wake up and recuse
themselves and fire: (1) The Judge, (2) Prosecutor, (3) and Jeff’s Attorney
Issue: We should have had a hearing to dissolved their operation
We found: The clerks were altering records in the Sheriffs office
VA working with the Sheriff’s Department
VA paying the Attorneys, Media and etc., under the table
145. Comments ref case #3: This example shows illegal retaliation and Double Jeopardy .
This is a recurring issue with the Justice System, VA, DOJ, Attorneys, Prosecutors,
States Attorneys and Sheriff’s Department.
Issue: If you don’t know how to protect yourself against these criminals, you WILL
go to jail, fake kangaroo court forever, as their goal is to discredit the whistleblower
on public record.
146. CASE #4 Lee and Luanne’s case,
Hillsborough/Tampa FL 13 Circuit Courts
148. Hillsborough Sheriff’s Department and
Tampa, Florida 13 Circuit Court is running a
scam with the elderly and service-disabled
veterans (see Marti Oakley 2019
Whistleblower slides)
149. Background
• James worked with the system (Tampa 13 Circuit Courts, Hillsborough Sheriff’s Department, Drug and
Alcohol Facility, Doctor, Nurse and Child and Adult protection agency). To set up his mother, Luanne
Simmons and Lee Smith James did the following:
• Put his name on everything
• Perjured himself on court documents. James stated his mother was a drug addict who was getting her drugs
from Lee Smith. James also said Lee was stealing money from his mother as he could not account for his
mother $50,000. James said this knowing his mother transferred $50,000 to another account to stop James
from stealing from her.
• James coordinated with the Hillsborough Sheriffs department server times to harass his mother. I got
involved on 23 Sep 2022 and asked: (1) the Tampa ADA Chief of Staff to assist, (2) Child and Adult Protection
Agency to help and (3) Sheriffs Department.
• James coordinated with the Sheriff’s department, Tampa 13 Circuit Court and the Drug and Alcoholic Facility
to commit her mother. On 3 Oct after James coordinated with the Hillsborough Sheriff’s Department and the
Court, the sheriff’s department enter Luanne’s house with a void court order. They told Luanne that they
were going to take her to the hospital 5 minutes upthe road, instead the Hillsborough sheriffs deputy took
Luanne 45 minutes to a drug and alcohol testing center without her walker and in a Hillsborough sheriff
• While in the center, Luanne was forced to take a urinalysis test which was negative. Once her test was found
150. CASE #2 Sue, Austin and Robert’s Case ref: SMJ
The Judge, Prosecutor and Clerks did the following to pretend SMJ/Sufficiency of Pleading:
(1) Said oh shit because we appeared in court to prove everyone was involved a RICO/ 18 USC
1341 crime to include the Criminal Judge, Prosecutor and etc.
(2) Judge Rand and the Prosecutor had the nerve to play us thinking we did not know our
rights. We played along so we could capture everyone on tape as we were setting them up.
They did the following:
(3) Wasted tax dollars
(4) Denied ADA Reasonable Accommodations
(5) The Prosecutors told us that they knew nothing about our case
(6) Judge Rand got PTSD and was rude by:
(1) Ignoring our ADA Advocate, Christopher King
(2) Ordered Robert not to issue Voncelle James any motions and etc
(3) Issued a fake unsigned order
(4) Did not or could not establish SMJ because…
151. Why VA Attorneys, VA Leaders and
Pawn Vocelle James could not establish
SMJ/Sufficiency of pleading
152. In order to establish SMJ 4 things need to be in the
court room.
1. Plaintiff: Voncelle James
2. Defendant: Robert
3. Competent Fact Witness: Christopher King (Our ADA Advocate, Attorney and Journalist)
4. Reason why we were there: Voncelle James said on the record that DOJ, Attorneys in building 810 and Amy Jackson needed the
fake peace order to help her should our higher court case against them goes to trial, However, Voncelle James perjured herself
on the fake police report, fake peace order and fake criminal records. On her perjured documents VJ said the following:
a) POLICE REPORT dated 6 Jun 2019: Robert was dangerous and came to her house stating, “I AM GOING TO GET YOU”.
b) PEACE ORDER dated 6 Jun 2019: Robert and I were (1) stalkers, (2) ex-employees who came to her house with weapons in
our car. NOTE: VJ also stated on her peace order that we were issuing a summons
c) CRIMINAL Report dated 9 June: In order to get us into criminal court, VJ stated we were criminals because we violated the
6 June void peace order. She took Christopher King’s Whistleblower video and said we were guilty because we were
associated with Christopher King. Voncelle James also use a Workers Compensation ADA Confidential Medical Email stating
Robert is guilty because he cc’d her on the email
• .
153. Issue with VA, VA Leaders and Voncelle establishing SMJ
using perjured document during criminal court
1. Everyone is involved (RICO, 18 USC 1341 and 42 USC 1986 violation) as we told everyone to stop before we
went to Kangaroo Court. Everyone knew VJ had perjured herself and did not/could not win in fake criminal
court using perjured documents. Furthermore, everyone knew we paid for a DE NOVO hearing in Sep. At
the De novo hearing, Judge Dwyer told everyone in court that Voncelle James fake peace order goes away.
Therefore, she could not take us to criminal court in November.
a) VJ POLICE REPORT dated 6 Jun 2019: Robert was dangerous and came to her house stating, “I AM GOING TO GET
YOU”. We have the truth on the record. This proves VJ is a liar with the support of VA leaders, Attorneys in Building
810 and MD court. This is a RICO, 42 USC 1342, 18 USC 241, 242, 1983 KKK, 18 USC 1506, 42 USC 1985, 42 USC
1986 and etc.
b) VJ PEACE ORDER dated 6 Jun 2019: Robert and I were (1) stalkers, (2) ex-employees who came to her house with
weapons in our car. NOTE: VJ also stated on her peace order that we were issuing a summons. This significant
because you cannot give a peace order to anyone who is doing anything legal. Also Robert and I are ADA Advocates,
it is a felony to retaliated against ADA Advocates. Furthermore, VJ stated on the record that DOJ, the Attorneys in
Building 810 told her that she needed the peace order to dismiss our higher court case against them which is
another crime.
c) JV CRIMINAL Report dated 9 June: In order to get us into FAKE KANGAROO CRIMINLAL COURT VJ stated we were
criminals because we violated the 6 June void peace order. Voncele James took Christopher King’s Whistleblower
video and said we were guilty because we were associated with Christopher King. Voncelle James also use a
Workers Compensation ADA Confidential Medical Email stating Robert is guilty because he cc’d her on the email.
154. In order to establish SMJ 4 things need to be in the
court room.
1. POLICE REPORT dated 6 Jun 2019: VJ perjured herself by stating Robert was dangerous and came to her
house stating, “I AM GOING TO GET YOU”.
1. PEACE ORDER dated 6 Jun 2019: VJ perjured herself by stating Robert and I were stalkers, ex-
employees who came to her house with weapons in our car. She also stated on her peace order that
we were issuing a summons
2. Criminal Report: In order to get us into criminal court, VJ stated we were criminals because we
violated the 6 June peace order because ADA Advocate, Attorney Christopher King, and Journalist
made a WHISTHLEBLOWER VIDEO, therefore we were guilty. She also use a Workers Compensation
Email stating Robert sent an email to her ref: their crimes and how workers compensation meeting
was late because Voncell could not attend because she filed a fake peace order on 6 June.
• .
155. Proof of fraud, waste and abuse and
TREASON in Washington, STATE Courts
(STATE, DISTRICT AND COURT OF
APPEALS)
156.
157. Explain how the deep state manipulates God’s natural
law using: (1) common law and (2) contract law
158. Explain courts/judge’s responsibilities to Americans and how they commit
TREASON
(1) The right to sue a judge and associates as nobody gets immunity
(2) Relief as per 1983 KKK, 1871 KKK, and Charter of the FOREST as relief
is mandatory
160. Our Justice System is corrupt as hell.
When they go rogue do this (1) Quo
Warranto and (2) get the Military
involve.
161.
162.
163. (6) References/Past Precedent which means any act, decision, or case
that serves as a guide or justification for subsequent decisions
164. Everyone should read the Secret of
the Legal Industry because we
Americans have been played by the
rich
165.
166.
167.
168.
169.
170.
171.
172.
173.
174.
175.
176.
177.
178.
179. Kangaroo Court Continues as SMJ is everything.
When the courts go rogue ask DOD
Ken Scott, here is my thoughts about Darrell Brooks case. Once Subject Matter Jurisdiction is
challenge, everything stops. The Plaintiffs must prove SMJ.
180.
181. It is a matter of law that the Judge follow the law. When SMJ is challenged
it is to be shown and proved BEFORE court proceeds
182.
183.
184. It all comes down to Corporate law/Clearfield Doctrine