SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 21
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
The UK Bribery Act 2010
         How it affects your business

           Presentation for UKTI in Almaty, Kazakhstan




13 March 2012           www.millerrosenfalck.com
Agenda
1. Introduction
2. Application
3. Main provisions of the Bribery Act
     a. Bribing another person and being bribed
     b. “Relevant function or activity”
     c. “Improper performance”
     d. Corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery
4. Conclusions?
5. The UK Bribery Act and the US FCPA
13 March 2012            www.millerrosenfalck.com
Introduction

• Bribery Act came into force on 1st July 2011

• Four new offences:
   1. bribing another person
   2. being bribed
   3. bribing a foreign public official
   4. a corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery


• Sanctions? Unlimited fines in certain cases

13 March 2012           www.millerrosenfalck.com
Application

•     Who is affected?
      a. all UK and foreign companies doing
         business in the UK
      b. all UK businesses trading overseas
         example - Kazakhstan
•     Where might an offence take place?
      a. UK
      b. overseas (if the offender has a “close connection
         with the UK”)


13 March 2012           www.millerrosenfalck.com
Application
• Exception
  No such connection with the UK is
  required in relation to corporate offences
  of failing to prevent bribery.

extended liability for commercial
 organisations
 (place of action or omission is immaterial)

13 March 2012    www.millerrosenfalck.com
Main provisions
• Bribing another person
 P offers, promises or gives a financial or other
  advantage

    – intending to induce the receiver to perform a    relevant
      function or activity improperly
    – as a reward for the improper performance of such activity or
      function


 P knows that the acceptance of the advantage in itself
  constitutes the improper performance of a relevant
  function or activity

 13 March 2012             www.millerrosenfalck.com
Main provisions
• Being bribed
 Receiver requests, agrees to receive or accepts a
  financial or other advantage
    – where R intends that a relevant function or activity is performed
      improperly; or
    – where requesting the advantage itself is the improper
      performance of a relevant function or activity; or
    – as a reward for the improper performance of such function or
      activity
 Receiver performs relevant activity or function
  improperly in anticipation of requesting or accepting
  a financial or other advantage


13 March 2012              www.millerrosenfalck.com
Main provisions
• “Relevant function or activity”
   a. any function of a public nature
   b. any activities connected with a business
   c. any activity performed in the course of a person’s
   employment
   d. any activity performed by or on behalf of a body of
   persons whether they are incorporated or unincorporated
• “Improper performance”
   a. relevant function or activity is performed in breach of a
   relevant expectation
   b. failure to perform the function in itself is a breach of a
   “relevant expectation”

13 March 2012           www.millerrosenfalck.com
Main provisions
   “Expectation”
    what a reasonable person in the UK would expect in
   relation to the performance of the type of function or
   activity concerned

   Any local custom or practice will be disregarded unless
   those are permitted by the written law of the country
   concerned ( very rarely)

   Means – local custom is not a defence




13 March 2012          www.millerrosenfalck.com
Main provisions
• Corporate Hospitality
  - acceptable
         a. for legitimate commercial purposes
         b. if it is proportionate and reasonable
         c. if it does not exceed costs for standard
         transportation and accommodation
   - unacceptable
         a. if disproportionate and lavish
         b. where there is no technical content or any
         business discussion in the meeting


13 March 2012            www.millerrosenfalck.com
Main provisions
• Facilitation payments
  - acceptable
         a. if made under “duress”
         b. if necessary to protect life, limb and liberty
   - unacceptable
         a. if made to public officials to secure or expedite
         performance of routine or necessary action
         b. if made repeatedly or premeditated




13 March 2012             www.millerrosenfalck.com
Main provisions
• Corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery
  A commercial organisation is guilty of an offence
  if a person, associated with C, bribes another person (in
  the UK or overseas).

  Commercial organisations include:
- Private limited companies incorporated in the UK
- Companies incorporated outside UK which carry out
  business in the UK
- Partnerships



13 March 2012          www.millerrosenfalck.com
Main provisions
• The defence
   “adequate procedures designed to prevent
  bribery”
         a. establishing a culture where bribery is
         never acceptable
         b. risk assessment
         c. due diligence
         d. communication and training
         e. monitoring and review




13 March 2012            www.millerrosenfalck.com
Main provisions
Examples for possible measures:
   - code of conduct with a clear anti-corruption element

   - written guidance on gifts, corporate hospitality,
   facilitation payments….

   - internal controls and implementation of whistleblowing
   procedures to prevent bribery

   - consider including standard clauses in commercial
   contracts prohibiting bribery and corruption

13 March 2012           www.millerrosenfalck.com
Conclusions
• No company doing business in and with the UK can
  afford to ignore the Bribery Act 2010

• Commercial organisations should review their existing
  procedures and policies to ensure compliance under the
  Act

• Standard terms should include provisions and adequate
  measures against bribery




13 March 2012        www.millerrosenfalck.com
The Act vs. the FCPA
Commercial bribery in general
    a. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act does not cover
    bribery without the involvement of a foreign official

    b. However, such conduct may be addressed under
    other US statutes in some cases, e.g. under the Travel
    Act


    c. "Foreign official" for the purposes of the FCPA has a
    broader meaning than "foreign public official" in the Act.


 13 March 2012           www.millerrosenfalck.com
The Act vs. the FCPA
• Failing to prevent bribery
Bribery Act                            FCPA
- Companies are held liable if         No specific offence for failing to
they fail to implement adequate        prevent bribery, however:
measure to prevent bribery
                                       - low threshold for corporate
- Senior officers are also guilty if   criminal liability in the US
an offence was committed by            - conviction for willful blindness
their company with their “consent
or connivance”




 13 March 2012               www.millerrosenfalck.com
The Act vs. the FCPA
• Accounting requirements
Bribery Act                            FCPA
No accounting requirements,            US issuers and their foreign
however provisions of the              subsidiaries are required to:
Companies Act 2006
                                       - keep accurate books,
All limited and unlimited              records and accounts
companies must keep adequate           - devise and maintain
accounting records.                    sufficient internal accounting
                                       controls to ensure such
                                       accuracy
Failure to do so is a criminal
offence for every company officer       Failure to do so is a strict
in default.                            liability offence



13 March 2012              www.millerrosenfalck.com
The Act vs. the FCPA
• Scope of application
Bribery Act                              FCPA
- UK companies, partnerships             -US issuers, US and foreign
and nationals                            companies, US nationals acting
                                         within the territory of the US or
- Foreign individuals or                 abroad
corporate bodies resident or
carrying on a business in the            - Parent companies are also
UK or elsewhere if there is a            responsible for ensuring the
close connection with the UK             compliance of any foreign
                                         subsidiaries over which they
- any individual or corporate            have a sufficient degree of
body carrying out bribery in             control.
the UK



 13 March 2012              www.millerrosenfalck.com
The Act vs. the FCPA
• Penalties and consequences
Bribery Act                            FCPA
- For individuals:                     - For individuals:
On conviction on indictment,           US$ 5 million per wilful
up to ten years                        violation as well as up to 20
imprisonment and/or an                 years imprisonment
unlimited fine.

- For companies:                       - For companies:
On conviction on indictment,           US$ 25 million per wilful
an unlimited fine (this                violation
includes for an offence
under section 7 of failing to
prevent bribery).


13 March 2012              www.millerrosenfalck.com
Contacts
   Miller Rosenfalck LLP
   Aylesbury House
   17-18 Aylesbury Street
   London EC1R 0DB
   England

   www.millerrosenfalck.com
   T +44 (0)20 7553 9930
   F +44 (0)20 7490 5060

                Stuart Miller, Senior Partner
                sm@millerrosenfalck.com
                http://uk.linkedin.com/in/stuartmiller1

13 March 2012                                             21

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie The Bribery Act 2010 Ukti 120313

SHFA Fraud and Corruption Control Framework - Employee Briefing
SHFA Fraud and Corruption Control Framework - Employee BriefingSHFA Fraud and Corruption Control Framework - Employee Briefing
SHFA Fraud and Corruption Control Framework - Employee Briefing
Dr Darren O'Connell AGIA
 
Fcpa ma slides presentation final
Fcpa ma slides presentation finalFcpa ma slides presentation final
Fcpa ma slides presentation final
Mayer Brown LLP
 
Edward Craft. Julian Mathews Master Class in English Law Course part2. 07.06....
Edward Craft. Julian Mathews Master Class in English Law Course part2. 07.06....Edward Craft. Julian Mathews Master Class in English Law Course part2. 07.06....
Edward Craft. Julian Mathews Master Class in English Law Course part2. 07.06....
Awara Direct Search
 
Uk Anti Bribery Act Slideshow 0211 Final
Uk Anti Bribery Act Slideshow 0211 FinalUk Anti Bribery Act Slideshow 0211 Final
Uk Anti Bribery Act Slideshow 0211 Final
Mayer Brown LLP
 
Uk anti bribery act slideshow 0211 final
Uk anti bribery act slideshow 0211 finalUk anti bribery act slideshow 0211 final
Uk anti bribery act slideshow 0211 final
Mayer Brown LLP
 
Richard Isham. The Bribery Act 07.06.2013
Richard Isham. The Bribery Act 07.06.2013Richard Isham. The Bribery Act 07.06.2013
Richard Isham. The Bribery Act 07.06.2013
Awara Direct Search
 
Blake lapthorn Bribery Act Thames Valley HR forum - 13 september 2011
Blake lapthorn Bribery Act Thames Valley HR forum - 13 september 2011Blake lapthorn Bribery Act Thames Valley HR forum - 13 september 2011
Blake lapthorn Bribery Act Thames Valley HR forum - 13 september 2011
Blake Morgan
 
Omassmann doing business in vietnam
Omassmann doing business in vietnamOmassmann doing business in vietnam
Omassmann doing business in vietnam
Dr. Oliver Massmann
 
What the new UK Bribery Act 2010 means for US companies
What the new UK Bribery Act 2010 means for US companiesWhat the new UK Bribery Act 2010 means for US companies
What the new UK Bribery Act 2010 means for US companies
Matt Stone
 

Ähnlich wie The Bribery Act 2010 Ukti 120313 (20)

Legal Compliance for doing business in United Kingdom and Europe
Legal Compliance for doing businessin United Kingdom and EuropeLegal Compliance for doing businessin United Kingdom and Europe
Legal Compliance for doing business in United Kingdom and Europe
 
SHFA Fraud and Corruption Control Framework - Employee Briefing
SHFA Fraud and Corruption Control Framework - Employee BriefingSHFA Fraud and Corruption Control Framework - Employee Briefing
SHFA Fraud and Corruption Control Framework - Employee Briefing
 
Fcpa ma slides presentation final
Fcpa ma slides presentation finalFcpa ma slides presentation final
Fcpa ma slides presentation final
 
Ethics in International Business: The UK Bribery Act 2010
   Ethics in International Business: The UK Bribery Act 2010   Ethics in International Business: The UK Bribery Act 2010
Ethics in International Business: The UK Bribery Act 2010
 
Edward Craft. Julian Mathews Master Class in English Law Course part2. 07.06....
Edward Craft. Julian Mathews Master Class in English Law Course part2. 07.06....Edward Craft. Julian Mathews Master Class in English Law Course part2. 07.06....
Edward Craft. Julian Mathews Master Class in English Law Course part2. 07.06....
 
Private equity and anti corruption slides final
Private equity and anti corruption slides finalPrivate equity and anti corruption slides final
Private equity and anti corruption slides final
 
Uk Anti Bribery Act Slideshow 0211 Final
Uk Anti Bribery Act Slideshow 0211 FinalUk Anti Bribery Act Slideshow 0211 Final
Uk Anti Bribery Act Slideshow 0211 Final
 
Uk anti bribery act slideshow 0211 final
Uk anti bribery act slideshow 0211 finalUk anti bribery act slideshow 0211 final
Uk anti bribery act slideshow 0211 final
 
Peixoto e Cury Advogados
Peixoto e Cury AdvogadosPeixoto e Cury Advogados
Peixoto e Cury Advogados
 
Richard Isham. The Bribery Act 07.06.2013
Richard Isham. The Bribery Act 07.06.2013Richard Isham. The Bribery Act 07.06.2013
Richard Isham. The Bribery Act 07.06.2013
 
The Legal 500: Bribery and Corruption Comparative Guide 2018
The Legal 500: Bribery and Corruption Comparative Guide 2018The Legal 500: Bribery and Corruption Comparative Guide 2018
The Legal 500: Bribery and Corruption Comparative Guide 2018
 
When Corporate Governance Fails - A look into decades of bribery by Rolls Royce
When Corporate Governance Fails - A look into decades of bribery by Rolls RoyceWhen Corporate Governance Fails - A look into decades of bribery by Rolls Royce
When Corporate Governance Fails - A look into decades of bribery by Rolls Royce
 
Blake lapthorn Bribery Act Thames Valley HR forum - 13 september 2011
Blake lapthorn Bribery Act Thames Valley HR forum - 13 september 2011Blake lapthorn Bribery Act Thames Valley HR forum - 13 september 2011
Blake lapthorn Bribery Act Thames Valley HR forum - 13 september 2011
 
Omassmann doing business in vietnam
Omassmann doing business in vietnamOmassmann doing business in vietnam
Omassmann doing business in vietnam
 
Omassmann doing business in vietnam
Omassmann doing business in vietnamOmassmann doing business in vietnam
Omassmann doing business in vietnam
 
Anti-Bribery Forensics and Compliance on a Multi-National Scale: Challenges a...
Anti-Bribery Forensics and Compliance on a Multi-National Scale: Challenges a...Anti-Bribery Forensics and Compliance on a Multi-National Scale: Challenges a...
Anti-Bribery Forensics and Compliance on a Multi-National Scale: Challenges a...
 
Anti Corruption
Anti CorruptionAnti Corruption
Anti Corruption
 
What the new UK Bribery Act 2010 means for US companies
What the new UK Bribery Act 2010 means for US companiesWhat the new UK Bribery Act 2010 means for US companies
What the new UK Bribery Act 2010 means for US companies
 
FCPA_UKBA_CA Journal
FCPA_UKBA_CA JournalFCPA_UKBA_CA Journal
FCPA_UKBA_CA Journal
 
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance (Series: Corporate & Regulatory Comp...
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance (Series: Corporate & Regulatory Comp...Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance (Series: Corporate & Regulatory Comp...
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance (Series: Corporate & Regulatory Comp...
 

The Bribery Act 2010 Ukti 120313

  • 1. The UK Bribery Act 2010 How it affects your business Presentation for UKTI in Almaty, Kazakhstan 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 2. Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Application 3. Main provisions of the Bribery Act a. Bribing another person and being bribed b. “Relevant function or activity” c. “Improper performance” d. Corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery 4. Conclusions? 5. The UK Bribery Act and the US FCPA 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 3. Introduction • Bribery Act came into force on 1st July 2011 • Four new offences: 1. bribing another person 2. being bribed 3. bribing a foreign public official 4. a corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery • Sanctions? Unlimited fines in certain cases 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 4. Application • Who is affected? a. all UK and foreign companies doing business in the UK b. all UK businesses trading overseas example - Kazakhstan • Where might an offence take place? a. UK b. overseas (if the offender has a “close connection with the UK”) 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 5. Application • Exception No such connection with the UK is required in relation to corporate offences of failing to prevent bribery. extended liability for commercial organisations (place of action or omission is immaterial) 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 6. Main provisions • Bribing another person  P offers, promises or gives a financial or other advantage – intending to induce the receiver to perform a relevant function or activity improperly – as a reward for the improper performance of such activity or function  P knows that the acceptance of the advantage in itself constitutes the improper performance of a relevant function or activity 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 7. Main provisions • Being bribed  Receiver requests, agrees to receive or accepts a financial or other advantage – where R intends that a relevant function or activity is performed improperly; or – where requesting the advantage itself is the improper performance of a relevant function or activity; or – as a reward for the improper performance of such function or activity  Receiver performs relevant activity or function improperly in anticipation of requesting or accepting a financial or other advantage 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 8. Main provisions • “Relevant function or activity” a. any function of a public nature b. any activities connected with a business c. any activity performed in the course of a person’s employment d. any activity performed by or on behalf of a body of persons whether they are incorporated or unincorporated • “Improper performance” a. relevant function or activity is performed in breach of a relevant expectation b. failure to perform the function in itself is a breach of a “relevant expectation” 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 9. Main provisions “Expectation”  what a reasonable person in the UK would expect in relation to the performance of the type of function or activity concerned Any local custom or practice will be disregarded unless those are permitted by the written law of the country concerned ( very rarely) Means – local custom is not a defence 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 10. Main provisions • Corporate Hospitality - acceptable a. for legitimate commercial purposes b. if it is proportionate and reasonable c. if it does not exceed costs for standard transportation and accommodation - unacceptable a. if disproportionate and lavish b. where there is no technical content or any business discussion in the meeting 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 11. Main provisions • Facilitation payments - acceptable a. if made under “duress” b. if necessary to protect life, limb and liberty - unacceptable a. if made to public officials to secure or expedite performance of routine or necessary action b. if made repeatedly or premeditated 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 12. Main provisions • Corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery A commercial organisation is guilty of an offence if a person, associated with C, bribes another person (in the UK or overseas). Commercial organisations include: - Private limited companies incorporated in the UK - Companies incorporated outside UK which carry out business in the UK - Partnerships 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 13. Main provisions • The defence  “adequate procedures designed to prevent bribery” a. establishing a culture where bribery is never acceptable b. risk assessment c. due diligence d. communication and training e. monitoring and review 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 14. Main provisions Examples for possible measures: - code of conduct with a clear anti-corruption element - written guidance on gifts, corporate hospitality, facilitation payments…. - internal controls and implementation of whistleblowing procedures to prevent bribery - consider including standard clauses in commercial contracts prohibiting bribery and corruption 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 15. Conclusions • No company doing business in and with the UK can afford to ignore the Bribery Act 2010 • Commercial organisations should review their existing procedures and policies to ensure compliance under the Act • Standard terms should include provisions and adequate measures against bribery 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 16. The Act vs. the FCPA Commercial bribery in general a. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act does not cover bribery without the involvement of a foreign official b. However, such conduct may be addressed under other US statutes in some cases, e.g. under the Travel Act c. "Foreign official" for the purposes of the FCPA has a broader meaning than "foreign public official" in the Act. 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 17. The Act vs. the FCPA • Failing to prevent bribery Bribery Act FCPA - Companies are held liable if No specific offence for failing to they fail to implement adequate prevent bribery, however: measure to prevent bribery - low threshold for corporate - Senior officers are also guilty if criminal liability in the US an offence was committed by - conviction for willful blindness their company with their “consent or connivance” 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 18. The Act vs. the FCPA • Accounting requirements Bribery Act FCPA No accounting requirements, US issuers and their foreign however provisions of the subsidiaries are required to: Companies Act 2006 - keep accurate books, All limited and unlimited records and accounts companies must keep adequate - devise and maintain accounting records. sufficient internal accounting controls to ensure such accuracy Failure to do so is a criminal offence for every company officer  Failure to do so is a strict in default. liability offence 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 19. The Act vs. the FCPA • Scope of application Bribery Act FCPA - UK companies, partnerships -US issuers, US and foreign and nationals companies, US nationals acting within the territory of the US or - Foreign individuals or abroad corporate bodies resident or carrying on a business in the - Parent companies are also UK or elsewhere if there is a responsible for ensuring the close connection with the UK compliance of any foreign subsidiaries over which they - any individual or corporate have a sufficient degree of body carrying out bribery in control. the UK 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 20. The Act vs. the FCPA • Penalties and consequences Bribery Act FCPA - For individuals: - For individuals: On conviction on indictment, US$ 5 million per wilful up to ten years violation as well as up to 20 imprisonment and/or an years imprisonment unlimited fine. - For companies: - For companies: On conviction on indictment, US$ 25 million per wilful an unlimited fine (this violation includes for an offence under section 7 of failing to prevent bribery). 13 March 2012 www.millerrosenfalck.com
  • 21. Contacts Miller Rosenfalck LLP Aylesbury House 17-18 Aylesbury Street London EC1R 0DB England www.millerrosenfalck.com T +44 (0)20 7553 9930 F +44 (0)20 7490 5060 Stuart Miller, Senior Partner sm@millerrosenfalck.com http://uk.linkedin.com/in/stuartmiller1 13 March 2012 21