SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 43
.
Belt : - Somrita Ghatak
MBB : - Amol Natu
Sponsor : - Parag P Pawar
Process Owner : - Sriram Srikantan
Reduction in Ergonomic Risk to facilitate Gender Diversity
Improvement from 7% workstations to 14% Work Stations in KV
Cylinder Block Line without affecting Quality & Productivity
2
Project Tracker
Define Phase
2
Reduction in Ergonomic Risks to facilitate Gender Diversity Improvement
from 7% workstations to 14% workstations in KV Cylinder Block Line without
affecting Quality & Productivity
1. Oil Gallery SPM- Ergo Risk 27 to be reduced to 10
2. Semi Finish Cam Bore- Ergo Risk 21.6 to be reduced to 10
3. Bush Press SPM- Ergo Risk 30 to be reduced to 10
4. DMG- Ergo Risk 14 to be reduced to 10
5. MHI- Ergo Risk 12 to be reduced to 10
6. Top Deburr Work Station- Ergo Risk 12 to be 10
DefinePhase Project Title
1.Define 2.Measure 3.Analysis 4.Improve 5.Control
Reduction in Ergonomic Risks to facilitate Gender Diversity
Improvement from 7% workstations to 14% workstations in
KV Cylinder Block with out affecting Quality & Productivity
Objective :
Benefits :
Project
Team :
Schedule :
5
1. Creating right environment
Belt : Somrita Ghatak
Team members : Dinesh R Kamthe, Sameer C Bhilare, Milind V
Bhagwat, Neeta N Chavan, Sandeep V Sadaphal,
Dyaneshwar J Dhamal
Sponsor : Parag P Pawar
Process Owner : Sriram Srikantan
Controller : Soma Ghosh
MBB : Amol Natu
DefinePhase Project Description
6
Grow to Rs
2544.9 Cr. with
20.3% PBIT in
2015
Leverage
Complementary
Businesses
1. Become Excellent in
Customer Support
Seek Profitable
Growth
Relentlessly
Pursue Cost
Leadership
Increase
Shareholder
Value
4. Achieve Supply
Chain Excellence
1. Deliver and exceed 2015 AOP
2. Execute capital projects on time
6. Achieve Low Cost
Provider Status
1. Achieve cost savings through ACE IV(direct material savings)
2. Hit Supply Chain improvement (AsCENT) and cost reduction targets for 2015
3. Achieve zero defect processes (AMAZE)
4. Achieve operational excellence through (APEX)
Great Place
to
Work
Strategic
Principles
Common
Critical Initiatives
IEBU Critical Initiatives/ Projects
1. SBP and FPC functional excellence
2. Implement ASCP by mm/yy and WMS at PHP , evaluate mobile Supply chain
3. Deliver and develop QSK 23 for all Industrial applications, ramp up Q 23 conrod exports
4. Take gross turns to 6 for 2015, PFEP target-
1. Create excellent leaders by deploying leadership programs (BSO, LCS) & extending sponsored
education (MBA, M.Tech)
2. Create & drive high performance culture through robust PMS & ODR
3. Grow the leadership pipeline with respect to diversity
4. Functional excellence for Product planning, VPI, SCM, Manufacturing and Quality
5. Focus on resource planning for A list projects
1. Excel in PQC
2. Leverage Synergies – CSE, Integrated Account Management & End User Management
3. Defend Existing Customers by improving customer satisfaction and ensure better management of
PGU, Exports & Parts
4. Reduce warranty cost by 5% over 2014 warranty cost
5. Differentiate between process and planning for project ad product business
6. 50% reduction in BIS - , ELF ,
7. Invest in Leadership
Development and
People
2. Develop a Growth
Mindset
1. Capture Adjacent Markets- Defense- Cr & Gas- Cr
2. Excel in VPI, VPC, parts exports- Q 23, Q60, Q19 wrt timeline and cost targets
3. Product Planning for new Emissions (Industrial– 2016; Powergen – 2017) – Engine and Emission
Solutions ; Launch Fit for Market products on time
4. Drive growth in Marine - Cr & construction- Cr and defend rail- Cr and compressor- Cr
5. Plan and deliver IEBU WIN initiatives of 5-1-0
Objectives
5. Meet Long Term
Financial Targets
1. Execute Safety and environment initiatives to deliver world class performance
2. Improve safety behaviors at all low performing sites
3. Improve contractor safety
4. Achieve safety target – and Enviroinment target -
5. Foster an open, safe & inclusive environment
8. Become World Class
in HSE
Create the
Right Work
Environment
9. Embed Corporate
Responsibility into our
Business
1. Support and measure leadership teams on engagement in community leadership
projects (through 5 IEBU leader led projects)
2. Drive company-wide initiatives: CCEW, Zero Garbage, etc.
3. Move from
Multinational to Global 1. Ramp-up the Q60 production for exports
2. Leverage India sourcing and low cost production for global markets
First Choice of
Customers
Achieve Zero Defect
Lead in Critical
Technologies
DefinePhase IEBU Goal Tree
Cummins Operating System - 10
Practices
Put the
customer first,
and provide
real value
Synchronize
flows (material,
physical and
information)
Design quality in
every step of the
process
Involve people
and promote
teamwork
Ensure equipment
and tools are
available and
capable
Establish the
right
environment
Create
functional
excellence
Treat preferred
suppliers as
partners
Follow common
problem solving
techniques
Use Six Sigma as the
primary process
improvement method
DefinePhase
1. Does the Sponsor have responsibility for the problem
being addressed ?
Yes No
2. Is the Process owner involved in Project definition
and evaluating Baseline ?
Yes No
3. Can the project be completed in 4 to 6 months? Yes No
4. Will the belt be able to spend @ 20% of time on this
project ?
Yes No
5. Which is/are the key Business Goals that the project
impacts the most ?
Elaborate, in brief –
 Recruit & develop Diverse
high Caliber work force
6. What is the likelihood of success? High Low
7. Impact of this project on Customer satisfaction
(Customer for the process being improved)
High Low
8
DefinePhase Project Selection Filters
9
•.One of Shop operation’s key initiatives aligned with
IEBU critical initiatives
“Facilitate gender diversity improvement in Shop
operations”
•Scope of this Project shall be work stations in KV
cylinder block line
DefinePhase
1. Oil Gallery SPM- Ergo Risk 27 to be reduced to 10
2. Semi Finish Cam Bore- Ergo Risk 21.6 to be reduced to 10
3. Bush Press SPM- Ergo Risk 30 to be reduced to 10
4. DMG- Ergo Risk 14 to be reduced to 10
5. MHI- Ergo Risk 12 to be reduced to 10
6. Top Deburr Work Station- Ergo Risk 12 to be 10
Why this Project?
• Project Scope
Identification
• Baseline
Calculation &
Target setting
• Belt, Sponsor
& Team
formation
• Establish
stake holders
for VOC
Define
• Risk
assessment
verification
• VOC
• Types of m/c
data collection
Measure
• Machine
categorization
• Top Risk score
• Proposal
Evaluation and
development
• Ergo
requirements
• Idea
generation on
selected
machine
Analysis
• Develop
solution design
• Implementatio
n on identified
machines
• Pilot
implementatio
n
Improve
• Update work
instruction &
RA with
improvements
• Maintenance
• Training
Control
Jan,15 Feb,15 Mar,15 Apr,15
p p p p
Road map for Reduction in Ergonomic Risks to facilitate
Gender Diversity Improvement from 5% workstations to 14%
workstations.
DefinePhase
11/18/2015 Cummins Confidential11
Solution Strategy
• Ergonomic Job Hazard Survey to identify improvement opportunity on
20% Work stations to deploy female operator to achieve at least 14%
Woman-Friendly Work Stations in KV Block, BU-01 by Q3 2015
• Calculation of Ergonomic Job Hazard Score on the Machines/ Work
Stations identified by Ergonomic Job Hazard Survey
• Certify Work Stations/ Machines to be woman-friendly on the basis of
BRIEF/BEST/NIOSH Study
• Find out the Key contributors to Ergo hazard for the work stations
showing high Ergo Risk (>20)
• Conduct various trials to reduce Ergo Risk
• Implement action to reduce Ergo Risk at identified points
• Budgetary proposal for points where trials have not resulted in the
reduction of Ergo risk
• Approval of Budget
Initiate procurement of Final solution and implement
DefinePhase
Measure Phase
2
13
Brief Details of Ergo Risk Score Measuring Tool
• Human-Tech is a Cummins Authorized System to evaluate Job
Ergonomic Hazard Score
• Brief-Best Score evaluation records 5 Types of causes (Posture, Force,
Duration, Frequency & Physical Stressors) of Ergonomic Risk to
Operator
• Final Job Hazard Score is calculated on the basis of Time Exposure on
Job per Week and it indicates Ergo Risk associated with the Job
BRIEF & Best Survey Data Collection Sheet
MeasurePhase
11/18/2015 Cummins Confidential14
Base Line Data
Scope of the Project
Work Stations with Lower Job Hazard Score is having lesser
Ergonomic Risk
i.e. Easily convertible to Woman-friendly work stations
MeasurePhase
Machine Name Ergo Risk Score Target
Oil Gallery SPM 27 <10
S/F Crank Bore SPM 21.6 <10
Bush Press SPM 30 <10
DMG 14 <10
MHI 12 <10
Top Deburr W/S 12 <10
• Total number of work stations in
KV Block, BU-01- 44
• Currently woman friendly- 7% (Top
Milipore, Inspection, Clearance)
15
Process Mapping
50K Bird Eye View
MeasurePhase
16
Process Mapping
5K View
MeasurePhase
17
Process Mapping
5K View
Contd.MeasurePhase
MeasurePhase
18
C & E Matrix
C & E Break Point- 50
MeasurePhase
19
FMEA
FMEA Break Point- 100
20
Key Inputs from FMEAMeasurePhase
21
3 Critical Input Variables
Found Critical X’s
All X’s
1st “Hit List”
MEASURE
ANALYZE
• Process Maps
• C&E Matrix
• Failure Modes and
Effects Analysis
Funneling Effect after Process Mapping
42
10
3
MeasurePhase
Analysis Phase
2
Translation
Establish :
Voice of Cust./
Voice of Biz
Analyse
Requirements
Redesign
Process
Solution
Design/
Development
Extract Images
& Voices
Requirements
KJ
Image KJ
Experience Stakeholders
World
Xform & Prioritise requirements Generate & select concepts Trial solution
11/18/2015
Process Redesign Road MapAnalyzePhase
11/18/2015
Stake Holders SelectionAnalyzePhase
 Objective – To understand the requirements of stake holders
with respect to ergonomics while ensuring Safety, Quality and
productivity.
The KJ was performed on GEMBA to understand the
requirements in details through a questionnaire.
Internal Stake holders
 Production associate
 Quality manager
 Production manager
 Process Manager
11/18/2015
Requirement KJAnalyzePhase
11/18/2015
Questionnaire prepared
considering three
parameters viz Height of
workstation, weight of
part, reach of part
Requirement gathering through QuestionnairesAnalyzePhase
Wrist aches after tightening cartridge in S/F
Stress felt after Insert change on S/F Cam Bore
Issue in horizontal reach for switched of spindle
on S/F Cam Bore.
Bush Press Machine Bar doesn’t work in
Auto, until a certain distance.
Pain on shoulder for carrying Alignment Bar on
shoulder
No Material handling provision for Functional
Gauges on Oil Gallery
Very risky to climb stairs while too change on Oil
Gallery. No proper support.
Material handling difficult as very heavy functional
gauge on Oil Gallery
Bending causes discomfort while lifting
alignment bar
Heavy Gauges are to lift for every job
Single person can’t handle functional
gauges on Oil Gallery
Very Heavy Alignment Bar causing Back
Pain on Bush Press
11/18/2015
Requirement KJ
Forklift thrashes with the Machine platform,
difficult to stand, no railings
Alignment bar is too heavy to carry
Bush Pressing bar in machine doesn’t go
inside without manual pushing
Storage of alignment bar is below waist level,
causing uncomfortable bends
Person may fall down if forklift thrashes with
platform of S/F Cam Bore
Wrist aches after tightening cartridge in S/F
Bush Press Machine Bar doesn’t work in
Auto, until a certain distance.
Bending causes discomfort while lifting
alignment bar
Single person can’t handle functional
gauges on Oil Gallery
Very Heavy Alignment Bar causing Back
Pain on Bush Press
Forklift thrashes with the Machine platform,
difficult to stand, no railings
Alignment bar is too heavy to carry
Bush Pressing bar in machine doesn’t go
inside without manual pushing
AnalyzePhase
Tools weight is too heavy to carry to
machine
Very heavy tools to be carried to machineHeavy tool changing activity
28
AnalyzePhase
29
AnalyzePhase
30
AnalyzePhase
31
AnalyzePhase
32
Key Contributor:
1. Tool Change Activity- Step 3 Action: To be done by CSE
Point Leader
Key Contributor: No Major Finding of Ergonomic Risk
Key Contributor:
1. Tool Change Activity- Step 3 Action: To be done by CSE
Point Leader
Requirement KJ
Modify Oil Gallery SPM, S/F SPM, Bush Press SPM, DMG, MHI, Top
Deburr Work Station in such a way that employees will not face
any ergonomic issue while working.
AnalyzePhase
DMG
MHI
Top Deburring Work Station
1. Machine Training required of Female Operator
AnalyzePhase
Fitness to Standard
Fitness to UseFitness to Latent Requirements
“Taken for
Granted”
Types of Needs:
1 – Fitness to Standard (Must Be)
2 – Fitness to use
3 – Fitness to Latent Requirements
Condition

Dissatisfied Feeling
Physically
Fulfilled
(Need is met)
“Competitive”
the more the better

(Need is not met)
“Surprise &
Delighters”
Satisfied
Feeling
Weight To be reduced of
Gauges used in Inspection in
Oil Gallery
Bush Pressing Bar very tight
for movement
Bush Press Alignment Bar
handling provision to be done
& weight to be reduced
Horizontal reach issues on S/F
Cam Bore
Material handling
provision to be made
for Functional Gauges
of Oil Gallery
Alternative option for Tool
Change
Training of the female
operator
KANO Model
34
Sr. No. Machine Name Actions Identified Responsibility Target Date Status
1 S/F Cam Bore SPM
Switch Position to be changed to improve
horizontal reach
Somrita 15-07-2015
Planned on
5/07/2015
3
Jib Crane & Air Balancer assembly to be
provided for handling of Functional Gauge
Somrita 31-07-2015
Quotation
received
4 Weight reduction of Functional Gauges Somrita 31-07-2015
Design In
Progress
6 Weight Reduction of Alignemnt Bar Somrita 31-07-2015
TDR released
to Tool Room
7 Easy handling provisioin of Alignment Bar Somrita 31-07-2015
Quotation
received
8 Modify Bush Pressing Bar Somrita 31-07-2015
Feasibility to
be checked
9 Arrange alternate plan for Heavy Tool Change activitySomrita 30-06-2015 Completed
10 CNC Machine Training of the female opertaor Somrita 31-07-2015 In Progress
11 Arrange alternate plan for Heavy Tool Change activitySomrita 30-06-2015 Completed
12 CNC Machine Training of the female opertaor Somrita 31-07-2015 In Progress
13 Top deburr Work StationTraining of the female operator Somrita 31-07-2015 In Progress
Oil Gallery SPM
Bush Press SPM
DMG
MHI
AnalyzePhase Action Plan to achieve 20% Woman-friendly Work stations to deploy
female operator against target of 14% Woman-friendly Work Station
in KV Block, BU-01 by Q-3 2015
Improvement
Phase
2
36
Improvement
Phase
37
38
Why Yellow Closure?
Late receipt of Quotations
from Various Suppliers
Delay in Raising RFA
Delayed Procurement of
Materials required
• Major Reason: Delay in submission of RFA
• Required Budget Summary: ~11 Lacs Against AOP approval of 25
Lacs for Human-Tech deployment
• RFA Raised on: 07/08/2015
• Current Status of RFA: RFA Approved on 18/08/2015
• Target Date for Green Closure- Q1, 2016
Root Cause Analysis for Yellow Closure
Please follow next Slide for machine wise
Details of delayed implementation of action
plan
Improvement
Phase
Why?
Why?
39
Machine Wise Details for Delayed Implementation of Action
Plan
Improvement
Phase
Target Completion Date for Green Closure: Q1, 2016
Control Phase
2
41
Final FMEAControlPhase
42
Control PlanControlPhase
43
THANK YOU

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

8 Disciplines (8D) Problem Solving Approach
8 Disciplines (8D) Problem Solving Approach8 Disciplines (8D) Problem Solving Approach
8 Disciplines (8D) Problem Solving ApproachJ. García - Verdugo
 
Lean Quick Changeover (SMED) Training Module
Lean Quick Changeover (SMED) Training ModuleLean Quick Changeover (SMED) Training Module
Lean Quick Changeover (SMED) Training ModuleFrank-G. Adler
 
SMED - Quick Change Over
SMED - Quick Change OverSMED - Quick Change Over
SMED - Quick Change OverOskar Olofsson
 
Improving On Time Delivery
Improving On Time DeliveryImproving On Time Delivery
Improving On Time DeliveryThomas Cantin
 
Quality inspector kpi
Quality inspector kpiQuality inspector kpi
Quality inspector kpimecarjom
 
Toyota production system
Toyota production systemToyota production system
Toyota production systemAkshay Jain
 
Six Sigma Yellow Belt Training
Six Sigma Yellow Belt TrainingSix Sigma Yellow Belt Training
Six Sigma Yellow Belt TrainingInvensis Learning
 
Six sigma case study-a good approach with example
Six sigma case study-a good approach with exampleSix sigma case study-a good approach with example
Six sigma case study-a good approach with examplebhanutomar
 
Total Productive Maintenance
Total Productive MaintenanceTotal Productive Maintenance
Total Productive MaintenanceAnand Subramaniam
 
Value added vs non value added
Value added vs non value addedValue added vs non value added
Value added vs non value addedAnwar Iqbal
 
Lean six sigma (green belt)new
Lean six sigma (green belt)newLean six sigma (green belt)new
Lean six sigma (green belt)newHakeem-Ur- Rehman
 
Process Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (PFMEA)
Process Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (PFMEA)Process Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (PFMEA)
Process Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (PFMEA)Anand Subramaniam
 
02training material for msa
02training material for msa02training material for msa
02training material for msa營松 林
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

8 Disciplines (8D) Problem Solving Approach
8 Disciplines (8D) Problem Solving Approach8 Disciplines (8D) Problem Solving Approach
8 Disciplines (8D) Problem Solving Approach
 
Lean Quick Changeover (SMED) Training Module
Lean Quick Changeover (SMED) Training ModuleLean Quick Changeover (SMED) Training Module
Lean Quick Changeover (SMED) Training Module
 
SMED - Quick Change Over
SMED - Quick Change OverSMED - Quick Change Over
SMED - Quick Change Over
 
Takt Time.pdf
Takt Time.pdfTakt Time.pdf
Takt Time.pdf
 
Improving On Time Delivery
Improving On Time DeliveryImproving On Time Delivery
Improving On Time Delivery
 
DMAIC Components
DMAIC ComponentsDMAIC Components
DMAIC Components
 
Quality inspector kpi
Quality inspector kpiQuality inspector kpi
Quality inspector kpi
 
Toyota production system
Toyota production systemToyota production system
Toyota production system
 
Six Sigma Yellow Belt Training
Six Sigma Yellow Belt TrainingSix Sigma Yellow Belt Training
Six Sigma Yellow Belt Training
 
TPM: Autonomous Maintenance (Jishu Hozen) Framework Poster
TPM: Autonomous Maintenance (Jishu Hozen) Framework PosterTPM: Autonomous Maintenance (Jishu Hozen) Framework Poster
TPM: Autonomous Maintenance (Jishu Hozen) Framework Poster
 
OEE
OEEOEE
OEE
 
Six sigma case study-a good approach with example
Six sigma case study-a good approach with exampleSix sigma case study-a good approach with example
Six sigma case study-a good approach with example
 
Total Productive Maintenance
Total Productive MaintenanceTotal Productive Maintenance
Total Productive Maintenance
 
DMAIC Components
DMAIC ComponentsDMAIC Components
DMAIC Components
 
DMAIC
DMAICDMAIC
DMAIC
 
Value added vs non value added
Value added vs non value addedValue added vs non value added
Value added vs non value added
 
Failure Mode & Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Failure Mode & Effects Analysis (FMEA)Failure Mode & Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Failure Mode & Effects Analysis (FMEA)
 
Lean six sigma (green belt)new
Lean six sigma (green belt)newLean six sigma (green belt)new
Lean six sigma (green belt)new
 
Process Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (PFMEA)
Process Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (PFMEA)Process Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (PFMEA)
Process Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (PFMEA)
 
02training material for msa
02training material for msa02training material for msa
02training material for msa
 

Ähnlich wie Six Sigma Final PPT - Revised

Ähnlich wie Six Sigma Final PPT - Revised (20)

kalpesh bendale MECH ENGG QA,QC SQA
kalpesh bendale MECH ENGG QA,QC SQAkalpesh bendale MECH ENGG QA,QC SQA
kalpesh bendale MECH ENGG QA,QC SQA
 
Harpreet Singh-Resume-QA
Harpreet Singh-Resume-QAHarpreet Singh-Resume-QA
Harpreet Singh-Resume-QA
 
Kalpesh bendale qa qc exp. 6.7 yrs
Kalpesh bendale qa qc exp. 6.7 yrsKalpesh bendale qa qc exp. 6.7 yrs
Kalpesh bendale qa qc exp. 6.7 yrs
 
Gauravcv
GauravcvGauravcv
Gauravcv
 
Resumepmlatest
ResumepmlatestResumepmlatest
Resumepmlatest
 
Rsume
RsumeRsume
Rsume
 
MHCCV_02-08-16
MHCCV_02-08-16MHCCV_02-08-16
MHCCV_02-08-16
 
Rakesh burman resume
Rakesh burman resume Rakesh burman resume
Rakesh burman resume
 
Gauravcv
GauravcvGauravcv
Gauravcv
 
Resume_Piyush Agarwal-DM-IE
Resume_Piyush Agarwal-DM-IEResume_Piyush Agarwal-DM-IE
Resume_Piyush Agarwal-DM-IE
 
SSK - Business Analyst
SSK - Business AnalystSSK - Business Analyst
SSK - Business Analyst
 
Krishnan_Resume
Krishnan_ResumeKrishnan_Resume
Krishnan_Resume
 
Nandan_1_ (3)
Nandan_1_ (3)Nandan_1_ (3)
Nandan_1_ (3)
 
Aghil Jith
Aghil JithAghil Jith
Aghil Jith
 
Cv linked in
Cv linked inCv linked in
Cv linked in
 
bks cv
bks cvbks cv
bks cv
 
Scott Moore relevant accomplishments bio
Scott Moore relevant accomplishments bioScott Moore relevant accomplishments bio
Scott Moore relevant accomplishments bio
 
Renni Consultancy - Introduction
Renni Consultancy - IntroductionRenni Consultancy - Introduction
Renni Consultancy - Introduction
 
Fmq lqos introduction npi rev 2
Fmq  lqos introduction npi rev 2Fmq  lqos introduction npi rev 2
Fmq lqos introduction npi rev 2
 
BE mechanical engineer with 9.7 years experience in production
BE mechanical engineer with 9.7 years experience in productionBE mechanical engineer with 9.7 years experience in production
BE mechanical engineer with 9.7 years experience in production
 

Six Sigma Final PPT - Revised

  • 1. . Belt : - Somrita Ghatak MBB : - Amol Natu Sponsor : - Parag P Pawar Process Owner : - Sriram Srikantan Reduction in Ergonomic Risk to facilitate Gender Diversity Improvement from 7% workstations to 14% Work Stations in KV Cylinder Block Line without affecting Quality & Productivity
  • 4. Reduction in Ergonomic Risks to facilitate Gender Diversity Improvement from 7% workstations to 14% workstations in KV Cylinder Block Line without affecting Quality & Productivity 1. Oil Gallery SPM- Ergo Risk 27 to be reduced to 10 2. Semi Finish Cam Bore- Ergo Risk 21.6 to be reduced to 10 3. Bush Press SPM- Ergo Risk 30 to be reduced to 10 4. DMG- Ergo Risk 14 to be reduced to 10 5. MHI- Ergo Risk 12 to be reduced to 10 6. Top Deburr Work Station- Ergo Risk 12 to be 10 DefinePhase Project Title
  • 5. 1.Define 2.Measure 3.Analysis 4.Improve 5.Control Reduction in Ergonomic Risks to facilitate Gender Diversity Improvement from 7% workstations to 14% workstations in KV Cylinder Block with out affecting Quality & Productivity Objective : Benefits : Project Team : Schedule : 5 1. Creating right environment Belt : Somrita Ghatak Team members : Dinesh R Kamthe, Sameer C Bhilare, Milind V Bhagwat, Neeta N Chavan, Sandeep V Sadaphal, Dyaneshwar J Dhamal Sponsor : Parag P Pawar Process Owner : Sriram Srikantan Controller : Soma Ghosh MBB : Amol Natu DefinePhase Project Description
  • 6. 6 Grow to Rs 2544.9 Cr. with 20.3% PBIT in 2015 Leverage Complementary Businesses 1. Become Excellent in Customer Support Seek Profitable Growth Relentlessly Pursue Cost Leadership Increase Shareholder Value 4. Achieve Supply Chain Excellence 1. Deliver and exceed 2015 AOP 2. Execute capital projects on time 6. Achieve Low Cost Provider Status 1. Achieve cost savings through ACE IV(direct material savings) 2. Hit Supply Chain improvement (AsCENT) and cost reduction targets for 2015 3. Achieve zero defect processes (AMAZE) 4. Achieve operational excellence through (APEX) Great Place to Work Strategic Principles Common Critical Initiatives IEBU Critical Initiatives/ Projects 1. SBP and FPC functional excellence 2. Implement ASCP by mm/yy and WMS at PHP , evaluate mobile Supply chain 3. Deliver and develop QSK 23 for all Industrial applications, ramp up Q 23 conrod exports 4. Take gross turns to 6 for 2015, PFEP target- 1. Create excellent leaders by deploying leadership programs (BSO, LCS) & extending sponsored education (MBA, M.Tech) 2. Create & drive high performance culture through robust PMS & ODR 3. Grow the leadership pipeline with respect to diversity 4. Functional excellence for Product planning, VPI, SCM, Manufacturing and Quality 5. Focus on resource planning for A list projects 1. Excel in PQC 2. Leverage Synergies – CSE, Integrated Account Management & End User Management 3. Defend Existing Customers by improving customer satisfaction and ensure better management of PGU, Exports & Parts 4. Reduce warranty cost by 5% over 2014 warranty cost 5. Differentiate between process and planning for project ad product business 6. 50% reduction in BIS - , ELF , 7. Invest in Leadership Development and People 2. Develop a Growth Mindset 1. Capture Adjacent Markets- Defense- Cr & Gas- Cr 2. Excel in VPI, VPC, parts exports- Q 23, Q60, Q19 wrt timeline and cost targets 3. Product Planning for new Emissions (Industrial– 2016; Powergen – 2017) – Engine and Emission Solutions ; Launch Fit for Market products on time 4. Drive growth in Marine - Cr & construction- Cr and defend rail- Cr and compressor- Cr 5. Plan and deliver IEBU WIN initiatives of 5-1-0 Objectives 5. Meet Long Term Financial Targets 1. Execute Safety and environment initiatives to deliver world class performance 2. Improve safety behaviors at all low performing sites 3. Improve contractor safety 4. Achieve safety target – and Enviroinment target - 5. Foster an open, safe & inclusive environment 8. Become World Class in HSE Create the Right Work Environment 9. Embed Corporate Responsibility into our Business 1. Support and measure leadership teams on engagement in community leadership projects (through 5 IEBU leader led projects) 2. Drive company-wide initiatives: CCEW, Zero Garbage, etc. 3. Move from Multinational to Global 1. Ramp-up the Q60 production for exports 2. Leverage India sourcing and low cost production for global markets First Choice of Customers Achieve Zero Defect Lead in Critical Technologies DefinePhase IEBU Goal Tree
  • 7. Cummins Operating System - 10 Practices Put the customer first, and provide real value Synchronize flows (material, physical and information) Design quality in every step of the process Involve people and promote teamwork Ensure equipment and tools are available and capable Establish the right environment Create functional excellence Treat preferred suppliers as partners Follow common problem solving techniques Use Six Sigma as the primary process improvement method DefinePhase
  • 8. 1. Does the Sponsor have responsibility for the problem being addressed ? Yes No 2. Is the Process owner involved in Project definition and evaluating Baseline ? Yes No 3. Can the project be completed in 4 to 6 months? Yes No 4. Will the belt be able to spend @ 20% of time on this project ? Yes No 5. Which is/are the key Business Goals that the project impacts the most ? Elaborate, in brief –  Recruit & develop Diverse high Caliber work force 6. What is the likelihood of success? High Low 7. Impact of this project on Customer satisfaction (Customer for the process being improved) High Low 8 DefinePhase Project Selection Filters
  • 9. 9 •.One of Shop operation’s key initiatives aligned with IEBU critical initiatives “Facilitate gender diversity improvement in Shop operations” •Scope of this Project shall be work stations in KV cylinder block line DefinePhase 1. Oil Gallery SPM- Ergo Risk 27 to be reduced to 10 2. Semi Finish Cam Bore- Ergo Risk 21.6 to be reduced to 10 3. Bush Press SPM- Ergo Risk 30 to be reduced to 10 4. DMG- Ergo Risk 14 to be reduced to 10 5. MHI- Ergo Risk 12 to be reduced to 10 6. Top Deburr Work Station- Ergo Risk 12 to be 10 Why this Project?
  • 10. • Project Scope Identification • Baseline Calculation & Target setting • Belt, Sponsor & Team formation • Establish stake holders for VOC Define • Risk assessment verification • VOC • Types of m/c data collection Measure • Machine categorization • Top Risk score • Proposal Evaluation and development • Ergo requirements • Idea generation on selected machine Analysis • Develop solution design • Implementatio n on identified machines • Pilot implementatio n Improve • Update work instruction & RA with improvements • Maintenance • Training Control Jan,15 Feb,15 Mar,15 Apr,15 p p p p Road map for Reduction in Ergonomic Risks to facilitate Gender Diversity Improvement from 5% workstations to 14% workstations. DefinePhase
  • 11. 11/18/2015 Cummins Confidential11 Solution Strategy • Ergonomic Job Hazard Survey to identify improvement opportunity on 20% Work stations to deploy female operator to achieve at least 14% Woman-Friendly Work Stations in KV Block, BU-01 by Q3 2015 • Calculation of Ergonomic Job Hazard Score on the Machines/ Work Stations identified by Ergonomic Job Hazard Survey • Certify Work Stations/ Machines to be woman-friendly on the basis of BRIEF/BEST/NIOSH Study • Find out the Key contributors to Ergo hazard for the work stations showing high Ergo Risk (>20) • Conduct various trials to reduce Ergo Risk • Implement action to reduce Ergo Risk at identified points • Budgetary proposal for points where trials have not resulted in the reduction of Ergo risk • Approval of Budget Initiate procurement of Final solution and implement DefinePhase
  • 13. 13 Brief Details of Ergo Risk Score Measuring Tool • Human-Tech is a Cummins Authorized System to evaluate Job Ergonomic Hazard Score • Brief-Best Score evaluation records 5 Types of causes (Posture, Force, Duration, Frequency & Physical Stressors) of Ergonomic Risk to Operator • Final Job Hazard Score is calculated on the basis of Time Exposure on Job per Week and it indicates Ergo Risk associated with the Job BRIEF & Best Survey Data Collection Sheet MeasurePhase
  • 14. 11/18/2015 Cummins Confidential14 Base Line Data Scope of the Project Work Stations with Lower Job Hazard Score is having lesser Ergonomic Risk i.e. Easily convertible to Woman-friendly work stations MeasurePhase Machine Name Ergo Risk Score Target Oil Gallery SPM 27 <10 S/F Crank Bore SPM 21.6 <10 Bush Press SPM 30 <10 DMG 14 <10 MHI 12 <10 Top Deburr W/S 12 <10 • Total number of work stations in KV Block, BU-01- 44 • Currently woman friendly- 7% (Top Milipore, Inspection, Clearance)
  • 15. 15 Process Mapping 50K Bird Eye View MeasurePhase
  • 18. MeasurePhase 18 C & E Matrix C & E Break Point- 50
  • 20. 20 Key Inputs from FMEAMeasurePhase
  • 21. 21 3 Critical Input Variables Found Critical X’s All X’s 1st “Hit List” MEASURE ANALYZE • Process Maps • C&E Matrix • Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Funneling Effect after Process Mapping 42 10 3 MeasurePhase
  • 23. Translation Establish : Voice of Cust./ Voice of Biz Analyse Requirements Redesign Process Solution Design/ Development Extract Images & Voices Requirements KJ Image KJ Experience Stakeholders World Xform & Prioritise requirements Generate & select concepts Trial solution 11/18/2015 Process Redesign Road MapAnalyzePhase
  • 25.  Objective – To understand the requirements of stake holders with respect to ergonomics while ensuring Safety, Quality and productivity. The KJ was performed on GEMBA to understand the requirements in details through a questionnaire. Internal Stake holders  Production associate  Quality manager  Production manager  Process Manager 11/18/2015 Requirement KJAnalyzePhase
  • 26. 11/18/2015 Questionnaire prepared considering three parameters viz Height of workstation, weight of part, reach of part Requirement gathering through QuestionnairesAnalyzePhase
  • 27. Wrist aches after tightening cartridge in S/F Stress felt after Insert change on S/F Cam Bore Issue in horizontal reach for switched of spindle on S/F Cam Bore. Bush Press Machine Bar doesn’t work in Auto, until a certain distance. Pain on shoulder for carrying Alignment Bar on shoulder No Material handling provision for Functional Gauges on Oil Gallery Very risky to climb stairs while too change on Oil Gallery. No proper support. Material handling difficult as very heavy functional gauge on Oil Gallery Bending causes discomfort while lifting alignment bar Heavy Gauges are to lift for every job Single person can’t handle functional gauges on Oil Gallery Very Heavy Alignment Bar causing Back Pain on Bush Press 11/18/2015 Requirement KJ Forklift thrashes with the Machine platform, difficult to stand, no railings Alignment bar is too heavy to carry Bush Pressing bar in machine doesn’t go inside without manual pushing Storage of alignment bar is below waist level, causing uncomfortable bends Person may fall down if forklift thrashes with platform of S/F Cam Bore Wrist aches after tightening cartridge in S/F Bush Press Machine Bar doesn’t work in Auto, until a certain distance. Bending causes discomfort while lifting alignment bar Single person can’t handle functional gauges on Oil Gallery Very Heavy Alignment Bar causing Back Pain on Bush Press Forklift thrashes with the Machine platform, difficult to stand, no railings Alignment bar is too heavy to carry Bush Pressing bar in machine doesn’t go inside without manual pushing AnalyzePhase Tools weight is too heavy to carry to machine Very heavy tools to be carried to machineHeavy tool changing activity
  • 32. 32 Key Contributor: 1. Tool Change Activity- Step 3 Action: To be done by CSE Point Leader Key Contributor: No Major Finding of Ergonomic Risk Key Contributor: 1. Tool Change Activity- Step 3 Action: To be done by CSE Point Leader Requirement KJ Modify Oil Gallery SPM, S/F SPM, Bush Press SPM, DMG, MHI, Top Deburr Work Station in such a way that employees will not face any ergonomic issue while working. AnalyzePhase DMG MHI Top Deburring Work Station 1. Machine Training required of Female Operator
  • 33. AnalyzePhase Fitness to Standard Fitness to UseFitness to Latent Requirements “Taken for Granted” Types of Needs: 1 – Fitness to Standard (Must Be) 2 – Fitness to use 3 – Fitness to Latent Requirements Condition  Dissatisfied Feeling Physically Fulfilled (Need is met) “Competitive” the more the better  (Need is not met) “Surprise & Delighters” Satisfied Feeling Weight To be reduced of Gauges used in Inspection in Oil Gallery Bush Pressing Bar very tight for movement Bush Press Alignment Bar handling provision to be done & weight to be reduced Horizontal reach issues on S/F Cam Bore Material handling provision to be made for Functional Gauges of Oil Gallery Alternative option for Tool Change Training of the female operator KANO Model
  • 34. 34 Sr. No. Machine Name Actions Identified Responsibility Target Date Status 1 S/F Cam Bore SPM Switch Position to be changed to improve horizontal reach Somrita 15-07-2015 Planned on 5/07/2015 3 Jib Crane & Air Balancer assembly to be provided for handling of Functional Gauge Somrita 31-07-2015 Quotation received 4 Weight reduction of Functional Gauges Somrita 31-07-2015 Design In Progress 6 Weight Reduction of Alignemnt Bar Somrita 31-07-2015 TDR released to Tool Room 7 Easy handling provisioin of Alignment Bar Somrita 31-07-2015 Quotation received 8 Modify Bush Pressing Bar Somrita 31-07-2015 Feasibility to be checked 9 Arrange alternate plan for Heavy Tool Change activitySomrita 30-06-2015 Completed 10 CNC Machine Training of the female opertaor Somrita 31-07-2015 In Progress 11 Arrange alternate plan for Heavy Tool Change activitySomrita 30-06-2015 Completed 12 CNC Machine Training of the female opertaor Somrita 31-07-2015 In Progress 13 Top deburr Work StationTraining of the female operator Somrita 31-07-2015 In Progress Oil Gallery SPM Bush Press SPM DMG MHI AnalyzePhase Action Plan to achieve 20% Woman-friendly Work stations to deploy female operator against target of 14% Woman-friendly Work Station in KV Block, BU-01 by Q-3 2015
  • 37. 37
  • 38. 38 Why Yellow Closure? Late receipt of Quotations from Various Suppliers Delay in Raising RFA Delayed Procurement of Materials required • Major Reason: Delay in submission of RFA • Required Budget Summary: ~11 Lacs Against AOP approval of 25 Lacs for Human-Tech deployment • RFA Raised on: 07/08/2015 • Current Status of RFA: RFA Approved on 18/08/2015 • Target Date for Green Closure- Q1, 2016 Root Cause Analysis for Yellow Closure Please follow next Slide for machine wise Details of delayed implementation of action plan Improvement Phase Why? Why?
  • 39. 39 Machine Wise Details for Delayed Implementation of Action Plan Improvement Phase Target Completion Date for Green Closure: Q1, 2016