2. Outline
• Blending social, physical and digital
environments
• What it takes to teach – innovative
learning designs
• Teachers sharing experience and
practice
• Tracking student achievement
5. The teacher should challenge the Learning Technology Environment
to support all these aspects of the collaborative learning process
L
C
Teacher
concepts
Peer
concepts
Peer
practice
Learning
environment
L
C
L
P
L
P
Teacher
communication
cycle
Peer
communication
cycle
Teacher
modelling
cycle
Peer
modelling
cycle
Learner
concepts
Learner
practice
Generate
Modulate
Generate
Modulate
The learner learning with technology
Web
resources
Webinars
Forum
Podcasts
Simulations
Games
Role plays
Multiplayer
games
Design tools
6. E-books with annotation; videos with bookmarking; animated diagrams
Short video clips; voice-over ppt; multiple online resources
Accessible resources to investigate and compare
Digital tools to collect and analyse data
Asynchronous discussion increases the ratio of student:staff talk
Synchronous forums for the few can be vicarious learning for the many
Using digital models (microworlds) recruits natural learning skills
Simulations, games, virtual labs, role-play games give new forms of feedback
Orchestrated roles and joint tasks increases peer feedback
Shared tools - wikis, Scholar, googledocs, design tools - support exchange
Design tools motivate the articulation of what has been learned
Outputs can be public and valued, in students’ online portfolios
Digital tools to improve pedagogy
– physical, social and virtual
Acquisition
Inquiry
Discussion
Practice
Collaboration
Production
Acquisition
Inquiry
Discussion
Practice
Collaboration
Production
9. A tool for teacher collaboration
learningdesigner.org.uk
20 minutes
Design tool elicits
structured details
of the teaching
idea, built around
the artefacts
Able to interpret what
a Tudor portrait is
intended to convey to
the viewerAnalysis of the learning
experience and duration
updates as you design
With thanks to the National Portrait Gallery
Read/Write/Listen
Investigate
Discuss
Practice
Collaborate
Produce
Decide how to tackle the problem in your group
11. The Learning Designer: Sharing pedagogy
Export to
Moodle
Develop a proposal using artefacts
Decide how to tackle the
problem in your group
Use the collection to
develop your proposal
Develop your proposal in
detail
Adapt the content
to using a different
collection for a
different type of
client
13. 1 Test? - is there a
‘Produce’ activity, or some
way the teacher can use to
test whether outcomes
are met?
2 Aligned? - are
outcome, activities, and
produce activity aligned?
3 Feedback? – is there
feedback from the
teacher, other students, or
the technology?
4 Technology? - is there
good use of technology?
5 Other?
The Learning Designer: Reviewing a learning design
Criteria for a good design
18. A design tool for teachers: The Learning Designer
• The teacher as designer must be able to
• Browse existing designs for blended learning
• Adapt these and create their own designs
• Review and analyse their pedagogic potential
• Test them with learners
• Redesign and re-test
• Publish their design for others to find
19. Can teaching become more like ‘design’?
Teachers building learning technology knowledge
BrowseBrowse
Adapt
Create
Develop
Redesign
Test
Browse
Publish
Question:
What is the
teaching design
equivalent of the
journal paper? We need to professionalise
teaching as we did research
20. Browse
Adopt
Adapt
Create
Review
Redesign
Test
Publish
Teaching as a design science
Building learning technology knowledge
Question:
What is the
teaching design
equivalent of the
journal?
Answer:
A collaborative
library of
orchestrated
open
online
co-designed
peer-reviewed
adaptable
learning designs
22. Learning through production – how teachers and
students know what they have learned
Types of production activity
• From acquisition - A summary of an issue
• From inquiry - A report on findings on a topic
• From practice - A solution to a problem
• From discussion - An interesting question
• From collaboration - A joint output
23. Learning through production enhanced by
technology
Learning through producing evidence of what has been learned
24. Multiple Choice Questions
Pose the question
Present the answers
‘Which is correct?’
Give feedback on each option
Concealed Multiple Choice Questions
Technology-enhanced assessment
Pose the question but conceal the options
Invite user-constructed answer
Present the answers as
‘These are students’ answers; which is
closest to yours?’
Give feedback on each option
Collect the inputs to refine the options
25. Introduce content
Self-paced practice
Tutor-marked test
Student becomes tutor for credit
Until half class is tutoring the rest
Assessment: By Tutor then cascades
The Keller Plan
The virtual Keller Plan
Introduce content – online video
Self-paced practice – interactive exercises
Tutor-marked test – online when first student is ready
Student becomes tutor – peer reviews next student…
Until half class is tutoring the rest – monitored by tutor
26. Assessment for the many through the few
Tutorial for 5 representative students
Questions and guidance help 5
students
The vicarious master class
The vicarious master class
online
Video of 5 representative students
Questions and guidance help 5000
students
27. 240 individual students give
response to open question
Pairs discuss to compare and give
joint response
Groups of 4 discuss to compare and
agree joint response as one of 10
responses...
6 groups of 40 students decide best
response
Teacher receives 6 responses to
comment on in class
Managing collaborative student responses
240 individual students post
response to open question
Pairs Skype to compare and post
joint response
Groups of 4 Skype to compare and
agree joint response and post as one
of 10 responses...
6 groups of 40 students vote on best
response
Teacher receives 6 responses to
comment on in Forum
Pyramid discussion groups
online
28. Digital models providing intrinsic feedback
Learning through practice with meaningful intrinsic feedback
Can you create these conditions in the Gases…?
This is how the gases look now.
29. 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Average time per action across formats
Target Ave time per item
Colour,
length
Colour,
length,
digits
14 mins
45 actions
18 secs per action
In Lab At home
Analytics: Intensive practice unsupervised
18 mins
145 actions
7 secs per action
30. Unlocking the power of technology for teaching
excellence
What it takes to teach with technology is not rocket science…
… It’s much much harder than that
Technology enables all teachers to share and
collaborate to develop new pedagogic knowledge
Collaborative design and development means we can keep
pace with technology innovation and students’ capability
it is essential to invest in enabling teachers to be the drivers
of pedagogic innovation for their students
Teaching as a design science enables excellence in teaching
31. Further details…
Teaching as a Design
Science (Routledge, 2012)
d.laurillard@ucl.ac.uk
http://learningdesigner.org/i
Hinweis der Redaktion
The same cycles can be prompted by interaction with a peer learner – discussing/arguing/explaining in the communication cycle; exchanging their practice in the modelling cycle, and commenting on each other’s work in the practice cycle.
Put together, the full picture represents all the different ways of learning, expressed in all the different pedagogical approaches listed.
Laurillard, D., Charlton, P., Craft, B., Dimakopoulos, D., Ljubojevic, D., Magoulas, G., . . . Whittlestone, K. (2013). A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs. . Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 15–30.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. New York and London: Routledge.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy and Technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97-118). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Types of learning are taken from Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. New York and London: Routledge.
Concealed MCQs: Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
The Keller Plan: Keller, F. S. (1974). Ten years of personalized instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 1(1), 4-9.
Pyramid Groups: Gibbs, G., & Jenkins, A. (1992). Teaching large classes in higher education: How to maintain quality with reduced resources. London: Routledge.
Concealed MCQs: Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
The Keller Plan: Keller, F. S. (1974). Ten years of personalized instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 1(1), 4-9.
Pyramid Groups: Gibbs, G., & Jenkins, A. (1992). Teaching large classes in higher education: How to maintain quality with reduced resources. London: Routledge.
Concealed MCQs: Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
The Keller Plan: Keller, F. S. (1974). Ten years of personalized instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 1(1), 4-9.
Pyramid Groups: Gibbs, G., & Jenkins, A. (1992). Teaching large classes in higher education: How to maintain quality with reduced resources. London: Routledge.
Concealed MCQs: Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
The Keller Plan: Keller, F. S. (1974). Ten years of personalized instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 1(1), 4-9.
Pyramid Groups: Gibbs, G., & Jenkins, A. (1992). Teaching large classes in higher education: How to maintain quality with reduced resources. London: Routledge.
Types of learning are taken from Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. New York and London: Routledge.