SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 27
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Search Functionality 

for Gmail and Google Drive
A Competitor Product Analysis For Microsoft
Mei Jen Chen

Nichole Fernkes

Sindhuja Narasimhan

Scott Taylor
• How do users approach Search in Gmail 

and Google Drive?
• How do users interact with the Search UI 

when trying to find a message or document?
• Do operators make users more successful and efficient
at finding items?
What we wanted to know
Why we did it
By studying how people search in Gmail 

and Drive, we sought to gain insights that
could inform MLW designs, wanting to 

understand what makes for a successful 

search experience, what should be 

avoided and what could be improved.
• We brought in nine seasoned
Gmail & Drive users—four
information workers and five
UW students.
• We observed them searching 

in their own accounts for 

their own messages and
documents.
How we did it
• We had them Think Out
Loud as they searched
• They answered questions 

in a Task booklet
• They also made some
higher level observations in
a post-test questionnaire
How we did it
Findings
01: People approach finding an email 

or document in one of four ways
01a: They use up to three keywords, most often starting 

with a name or email, and using the Quick-Find pane
01b: They use a combination of operators, keywords, 

and auto-suggest or Quick-Find
01b: They use a combination of operators, keywords, 

and auto-suggest or Quick-Find
01b: They use a combination of operators, keywords, 

and auto-suggest or Quick-Find
01c: They browse, enter a name or email as a keyword,

then browse the search results
01d: They open up the Advanced Search drop-down

and check off boxes or fill in fields
02: Even searchers browse sometimes
Quote:
“If it’s something I really need to get to 

[in Google Drive], it’s probably in recent.”
03: People can’t always remember 

which account the email is in.
Most people we spoke with had multiple 

Gmail accounts—personal ones as well as 

one (or more) for work or school.
They wished they could include all

their accounts in a search.
People strongly associate email with the sender. 

This makes it a good tack to take for initially 

narrowing results.
04: People begin their search most often using a name 

or an email address as their first keyword.
Also, the search box auto-suggests the name or email
address after typing just a few letters.
04: People begin their search most often using a name 

or an email address as their first keyword.
05: Most people find what they’re looking for 

with 2-3 keywords.
We did not observe anyone typing in more than 3 keywords.
• Either they had Quick-Find success
• Or they felt that 3 words was enough to either 

get the job done or
• they needed to rethink their keyword strategy 

and start a new “line of thought.”
• Most people used the autofill suggestions to complete email
addresses as they were typing in the email sender's name
• Some people used the 

autofill to help them 

complete keywords as 

they were typing 

them out in the search. 
• Most of the people 

we observed leveraged 

the top 3 results of 

the QF Pane suggestions. 
06 QF Pane Findings 

07: Most people don’t see advanced search.
• The Advanced Search
functions are accessed by
clicking on a small
unassuming arrow on the right
hand side of the search box.
“I didn't know 

it was there.”
Quote:
“It’s faster for me to type [in search box] than to 

actually do all of the clicks and mouse movements 

[in Advanced Search]."
08: People who use operators, perceived it to be a
faster process than using advanced search
09: When people try advanced search, they feel 

it requires a lot of time and effort
“I can just type in multiple keywords in the
search box, the results will be the same.”
The People who use operators find that
switching from keyboard to mouse and back is
ineffecient.
Data derived from the post test questionnaire:
Hardly anyone used advanced search, but
conjectured that of the scenarios they would
use it for finding:
– Attachments
– to/from
– date ranges
10: People find advanced search useful 

in specific cases.
Key Takeaways
• People try to scope a set of results using 2-3 keywords,
most often starting with the sender’s name or email
• The ability to quickly modify a query is important
• Everyone makes use of the Search Bar auto-fill feature
• Everyone found the Quick Find pane to be very useful.
Nobody mentioned it as they Thought Out Loud—its
use came naturally and intuitively
• People tend to have multiple accounts and wish they
could search them all simultaneously—instead of
having to perform the same search in each account
when they can’t remember who sent the mail
• Advanced Search is hard to find and mostly, people
don’t use it. When exposed to it, they expressed
doubt about using it very often in the future.
• Advanced Search was used occasionally by a third of
the people as a reference for learning operator
syntax.
Key Takeaways
Thank You!

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Classroom Smackdown: Google vs Microsoft
Classroom Smackdown: Google vs MicrosoftClassroom Smackdown: Google vs Microsoft
Classroom Smackdown: Google vs MicrosoftMiguel Guhlin
 
Apple, google and ms
Apple, google and msApple, google and ms
Apple, google and msniz73
 
Amazon, facebook, google and apple case study
Amazon, facebook, google and apple case studyAmazon, facebook, google and apple case study
Amazon, facebook, google and apple case studyToko Bunga Surabaya
 
McDonald’s Case Study | McDonald’s Pest Analysis | BusinessStrategic Manageme...
McDonald’s Case Study | McDonald’s Pest Analysis | BusinessStrategic Manageme...McDonald’s Case Study | McDonald’s Pest Analysis | BusinessStrategic Manageme...
McDonald’s Case Study | McDonald’s Pest Analysis | BusinessStrategic Manageme...MyAssignmenthelp.com
 
Chapter-5 Industry and competitor analysis
Chapter-5 Industry and competitor analysisChapter-5 Industry and competitor analysis
Chapter-5 Industry and competitor analysisAfzaal Ali
 
Case Study Analysis Of Google
Case Study Analysis Of GoogleCase Study Analysis Of Google
Case Study Analysis Of Googleabnguyen28
 
Market & competitor analysis template in PPT
Market & competitor analysis template in PPTMarket & competitor analysis template in PPT
Market & competitor analysis template in PPTAurelien Domont, MBA
 

Andere mochten auch (9)

Classroom Smackdown: Google vs Microsoft
Classroom Smackdown: Google vs MicrosoftClassroom Smackdown: Google vs Microsoft
Classroom Smackdown: Google vs Microsoft
 
Apple, google and ms
Apple, google and msApple, google and ms
Apple, google and ms
 
Google for education vs office 365
Google for education vs office 365Google for education vs office 365
Google for education vs office 365
 
Amazon, facebook, google and apple case study
Amazon, facebook, google and apple case studyAmazon, facebook, google and apple case study
Amazon, facebook, google and apple case study
 
McDonald’s Case Study | McDonald’s Pest Analysis | BusinessStrategic Manageme...
McDonald’s Case Study | McDonald’s Pest Analysis | BusinessStrategic Manageme...McDonald’s Case Study | McDonald’s Pest Analysis | BusinessStrategic Manageme...
McDonald’s Case Study | McDonald’s Pest Analysis | BusinessStrategic Manageme...
 
Chapter-5 Industry and competitor analysis
Chapter-5 Industry and competitor analysisChapter-5 Industry and competitor analysis
Chapter-5 Industry and competitor analysis
 
Google Case Study
Google Case StudyGoogle Case Study
Google Case Study
 
Case Study Analysis Of Google
Case Study Analysis Of GoogleCase Study Analysis Of Google
Case Study Analysis Of Google
 
Market & competitor analysis template in PPT
Market & competitor analysis template in PPTMarket & competitor analysis template in PPT
Market & competitor analysis template in PPT
 

Ähnlich wie Microsoft presentation

SPSBE14 Intranet Search #fail
SPSBE14 Intranet Search #failSPSBE14 Intranet Search #fail
SPSBE14 Intranet Search #failBen van Mol
 
SharePoint Saturday Belgium 2013 Intranet search fail
SharePoint Saturday Belgium 2013 Intranet search failSharePoint Saturday Belgium 2013 Intranet search fail
SharePoint Saturday Belgium 2013 Intranet search failBIWUG
 
Internal Search - The Lost Child of Web Analytics
Internal Search - The Lost Child of Web AnalyticsInternal Search - The Lost Child of Web Analytics
Internal Search - The Lost Child of Web AnalyticsCharles Meaden
 
Search Behavior Patterns
Search Behavior PatternsSearch Behavior Patterns
Search Behavior PatternsRamzi Alqrainy
 
Rethinking Search Results from a UX Perspective
Rethinking Search Results from a UX PerspectiveRethinking Search Results from a UX Perspective
Rethinking Search Results from a UX PerspectiveBrian Frank
 
Rethinking Search Results from the Users' Perspective
Rethinking Search Results from the Users' PerspectiveRethinking Search Results from the Users' Perspective
Rethinking Search Results from the Users' PerspectiveSarah Khan
 
How to lay a solid job search foundation before you graduate
How to lay a solid job search foundation before you graduateHow to lay a solid job search foundation before you graduate
How to lay a solid job search foundation before you graduateLee Gamelin
 
How to build a winning Data Science resume
How to build a winning Data Science resumeHow to build a winning Data Science resume
How to build a winning Data Science resumeBrian Spiering
 
Questionnaires 6 steps for research method.
Questionnaires 6 steps for research method.Questionnaires 6 steps for research method.
Questionnaires 6 steps for research method.Namo Kim
 
Prototype Version 1 .docx
Prototype Version 1 .docxPrototype Version 1 .docx
Prototype Version 1 .docxwoodruffeloisa
 
Audience Research on a Dime - Nonprofit of Influence
Audience Research on a Dime - Nonprofit of InfluenceAudience Research on a Dime - Nonprofit of Influence
Audience Research on a Dime - Nonprofit of InfluenceCourtney Clark
 
Online research and research skills
Online research and research skillsOnline research and research skills
Online research and research skillsLive Angga
 
SRC101 Introduction to Search #365EDUCon
SRC101 Introduction to Search #365EDUConSRC101 Introduction to Search #365EDUCon
SRC101 Introduction to Search #365EDUConKanwal Khipple
 
Introduction to Microsoft Search #SRC101 #365EduCon 20211214
Introduction to Microsoft Search #SRC101 #365EduCon 20211214Introduction to Microsoft Search #SRC101 #365EduCon 20211214
Introduction to Microsoft Search #SRC101 #365EduCon 20211214Kanwal Khipple
 
Usability Testing for Technical Writers
Usability Testing for Technical WritersUsability Testing for Technical Writers
Usability Testing for Technical WritersDimiter Simov
 

Ähnlich wie Microsoft presentation (20)

Web based information resources
Web based information resourcesWeb based information resources
Web based information resources
 
SPSBE14 Intranet Search #fail
SPSBE14 Intranet Search #failSPSBE14 Intranet Search #fail
SPSBE14 Intranet Search #fail
 
SharePoint Saturday Belgium 2013 Intranet search fail
SharePoint Saturday Belgium 2013 Intranet search failSharePoint Saturday Belgium 2013 Intranet search fail
SharePoint Saturday Belgium 2013 Intranet search fail
 
Internal Search - The Lost Child of Web Analytics
Internal Search - The Lost Child of Web AnalyticsInternal Search - The Lost Child of Web Analytics
Internal Search - The Lost Child of Web Analytics
 
Search Behavior Patterns
Search Behavior PatternsSearch Behavior Patterns
Search Behavior Patterns
 
Rethinking Search Results from a UX Perspective
Rethinking Search Results from a UX PerspectiveRethinking Search Results from a UX Perspective
Rethinking Search Results from a UX Perspective
 
Rethinking Search Results from the Users' Perspective
Rethinking Search Results from the Users' PerspectiveRethinking Search Results from the Users' Perspective
Rethinking Search Results from the Users' Perspective
 
How to lay a solid job search foundation before you graduate
How to lay a solid job search foundation before you graduateHow to lay a solid job search foundation before you graduate
How to lay a solid job search foundation before you graduate
 
How to build a winning Data Science resume
How to build a winning Data Science resumeHow to build a winning Data Science resume
How to build a winning Data Science resume
 
Questionnaires 6 steps for research method.
Questionnaires 6 steps for research method.Questionnaires 6 steps for research method.
Questionnaires 6 steps for research method.
 
Prototype Version 1 .docx
Prototype Version 1 .docxPrototype Version 1 .docx
Prototype Version 1 .docx
 
Audience Research on a Dime - Nonprofit of Influence
Audience Research on a Dime - Nonprofit of InfluenceAudience Research on a Dime - Nonprofit of Influence
Audience Research on a Dime - Nonprofit of Influence
 
online survey
online surveyonline survey
online survey
 
Session 10 email marketing
Session 10 email marketingSession 10 email marketing
Session 10 email marketing
 
Online research and research skills
Online research and research skillsOnline research and research skills
Online research and research skills
 
HCI - online surveys
HCI - online surveysHCI - online surveys
HCI - online surveys
 
SRC101 Introduction to Search #365EDUCon
SRC101 Introduction to Search #365EDUConSRC101 Introduction to Search #365EDUCon
SRC101 Introduction to Search #365EDUCon
 
Introduction to Microsoft Search #SRC101 #365EduCon 20211214
Introduction to Microsoft Search #SRC101 #365EduCon 20211214Introduction to Microsoft Search #SRC101 #365EduCon 20211214
Introduction to Microsoft Search #SRC101 #365EduCon 20211214
 
Optimization stepbystep
Optimization stepbystepOptimization stepbystep
Optimization stepbystep
 
Usability Testing for Technical Writers
Usability Testing for Technical WritersUsability Testing for Technical Writers
Usability Testing for Technical Writers
 

Microsoft presentation

  • 1. Search Functionality 
 for Gmail and Google Drive A Competitor Product Analysis For Microsoft Mei Jen Chen
 Nichole Fernkes
 Sindhuja Narasimhan
 Scott Taylor
  • 2. • How do users approach Search in Gmail 
 and Google Drive? • How do users interact with the Search UI 
 when trying to find a message or document? • Do operators make users more successful and efficient at finding items? What we wanted to know
  • 3. Why we did it By studying how people search in Gmail 
 and Drive, we sought to gain insights that could inform MLW designs, wanting to 
 understand what makes for a successful 
 search experience, what should be 
 avoided and what could be improved.
  • 4. • We brought in nine seasoned Gmail & Drive users—four information workers and five UW students. • We observed them searching 
 in their own accounts for 
 their own messages and documents. How we did it
  • 5. • We had them Think Out Loud as they searched • They answered questions 
 in a Task booklet • They also made some higher level observations in a post-test questionnaire How we did it
  • 7. 01: People approach finding an email 
 or document in one of four ways
  • 8. 01a: They use up to three keywords, most often starting 
 with a name or email, and using the Quick-Find pane
  • 9. 01b: They use a combination of operators, keywords, 
 and auto-suggest or Quick-Find
  • 10. 01b: They use a combination of operators, keywords, 
 and auto-suggest or Quick-Find
  • 11. 01b: They use a combination of operators, keywords, 
 and auto-suggest or Quick-Find
  • 12. 01c: They browse, enter a name or email as a keyword,
 then browse the search results
  • 13. 01d: They open up the Advanced Search drop-down
 and check off boxes or fill in fields
  • 14. 02: Even searchers browse sometimes Quote: “If it’s something I really need to get to 
 [in Google Drive], it’s probably in recent.”
  • 15. 03: People can’t always remember 
 which account the email is in. Most people we spoke with had multiple 
 Gmail accounts—personal ones as well as 
 one (or more) for work or school. They wished they could include all
 their accounts in a search.
  • 16. People strongly associate email with the sender. 
 This makes it a good tack to take for initially 
 narrowing results. 04: People begin their search most often using a name 
 or an email address as their first keyword.
  • 17. Also, the search box auto-suggests the name or email address after typing just a few letters. 04: People begin their search most often using a name 
 or an email address as their first keyword.
  • 18. 05: Most people find what they’re looking for 
 with 2-3 keywords. We did not observe anyone typing in more than 3 keywords. • Either they had Quick-Find success • Or they felt that 3 words was enough to either 
 get the job done or • they needed to rethink their keyword strategy 
 and start a new “line of thought.”
  • 19. • Most people used the autofill suggestions to complete email addresses as they were typing in the email sender's name • Some people used the 
 autofill to help them 
 complete keywords as 
 they were typing 
 them out in the search.  • Most of the people 
 we observed leveraged 
 the top 3 results of 
 the QF Pane suggestions.  06 QF Pane Findings 

  • 20. 07: Most people don’t see advanced search. • The Advanced Search functions are accessed by clicking on a small unassuming arrow on the right hand side of the search box. “I didn't know 
 it was there.”
  • 21. Quote: “It’s faster for me to type [in search box] than to 
 actually do all of the clicks and mouse movements 
 [in Advanced Search]." 08: People who use operators, perceived it to be a faster process than using advanced search
  • 22. 09: When people try advanced search, they feel 
 it requires a lot of time and effort “I can just type in multiple keywords in the search box, the results will be the same.” The People who use operators find that switching from keyboard to mouse and back is ineffecient.
  • 23. Data derived from the post test questionnaire: Hardly anyone used advanced search, but conjectured that of the scenarios they would use it for finding: – Attachments – to/from – date ranges 10: People find advanced search useful 
 in specific cases.
  • 24. Key Takeaways • People try to scope a set of results using 2-3 keywords, most often starting with the sender’s name or email • The ability to quickly modify a query is important • Everyone makes use of the Search Bar auto-fill feature • Everyone found the Quick Find pane to be very useful. Nobody mentioned it as they Thought Out Loud—its use came naturally and intuitively
  • 25. • People tend to have multiple accounts and wish they could search them all simultaneously—instead of having to perform the same search in each account when they can’t remember who sent the mail • Advanced Search is hard to find and mostly, people don’t use it. When exposed to it, they expressed doubt about using it very often in the future. • Advanced Search was used occasionally by a third of the people as a reference for learning operator syntax. Key Takeaways
  • 26.