CAT Management From Insurance Perspective - Turkish Natural Catastrophe Insurance Pool - VI. International Istanbul Insurance Conference - Musa Alphan Bahar (2014)
CAT Management From Insurance Perspective - Turkish Natural Catastrophe Insurance Pool - VI. International Istanbul Insurance Conference - Musa Alphan Bahar (2014)
Ăhnlich wie CAT Management From Insurance Perspective - Turkish Natural Catastrophe Insurance Pool - VI. International Istanbul Insurance Conference - Musa Alphan Bahar (2014)
Aerial Data Management and The Digital EnterpriseAdvisian
Â
Ăhnlich wie CAT Management From Insurance Perspective - Turkish Natural Catastrophe Insurance Pool - VI. International Istanbul Insurance Conference - Musa Alphan Bahar (2014) (20)
CAT Management From Insurance Perspective - Turkish Natural Catastrophe Insurance Pool - VI. International Istanbul Insurance Conference - Musa Alphan Bahar (2014)
2. DASK IN THE FUTURE
HAVING ROBUST
PLATFORM
DEVELOPING
CONTINGENCY
RESOURCES
IMPROVING
COORDINATION
USE OF TECHNOLOGY
6 MILLION POLICIES
IN 2014
10 MILLION POLICIES
2017
EFFECTIIVE USE OF CHECK POINTS
USE OF IMPROVED METHODOLOGIES AND RISK REDUCTION
STUDEIS
STRONG COORDINATION WITH STAKE HOLDERS AND CONTINOUS PUBLIC RELATION ACTIVITIES
INCREASING PENETRATION IMPROVING CAT MANAGEMENT
4. LESSONS
âȘ Operational capacity is as important as
financial capacity
âȘ Outdated operational manuals
âȘ Procedures must be simple and lean
âȘ Application of sum insured or indemnity limits
âȘ Necessity for collaboration between;
âȘ Industries
âȘ companies and public offices
âȘ cities-countries
âȘ Lack of;
âȘ adjusting capacity
âȘ technology
âȘ Field knowledge
LESSONS
âȘ Less loss of lives in the countries with stringent
building codes (Chile and New Zealand)
âȘ Multiple events are not unusual (1999 Turkey
and 2011 New Zealand)
âȘ Secondary risk causing severe damages
(tsunami, liquefaction, nuclear damage)
âȘ Modeling has itâs limitation
âȘ Underestimated scenarios
âȘ Economic
âȘ Political
âȘ Demographic
âȘ Ambiguity on expectations from insurance
industry
âȘ Importance of strong construction industry
âȘ Need for more involvement of Government
support
NEW ERA IN CAT MANAGEMENT
o 12.01.10 7.0 Haiti Earthquake
o 27.02.10 8.8 Chile Earthquake
o 04.09.10 7.1 New Zealand Earthquake
o 11.01.11 Australian Flood
o 11.03.11 8.9 Japan Earthquake
o 22.02.11 6.3 New Zealand Earthquake
OPERATIONAL
CAPACITY
AS
IMPORTANT
AS
FINANCIAL
o 23.09.2011 Van Earthquake
o 09.11.2011 Van Earthquake
o 2012 KĂŒtahya Earthquake
JAPAN
MODEL
NEW ZELAND MODEL
DASKâS
STRATEGY
FOR THE
FUTURE
5. SUCCES FACTORS IN CAT MANAGEMENT
SUCCESS
PENETRATI
ON
PROTECTIO
N
OPERATION
âȘ Maintaining high insurance penetration
for low frequency and high severity risks
is challenging issue
âȘ Must achieve sizeable insurance
penetration
âȘ Must obtain social support and
awareness
âȘ Must convince society
âȘ Must provide claim payment capacity
âȘ Must establish confidence in
stakeholders
âȘ Must establish lean and effective
organization
âȘ Must establish robust infrastructure
âȘ Must utilize contingency capacities
6. OPERATION-WHAT IS FEASIBLE
VERSUSCONTINGENCY EFFICIENCY
âȘ Should we invest for cat event
âȘ How much should we invest
âȘ What is feasible investment
âȘ To achieve low cost product, services,
operation and organization is critical
for long term survival
âȘ Hard to justify high investment in
claim management
âȘ High annual operational cost is not
sustainable
âȘ Business process is about operational
managemenet (claim notification,
adjustment, claim payment etc..)
âȘ Earthquake process is about field
management (extent of damage,
worst hit area, after shocks etc)
MAINTAINING LOW COST PRINCIPAL
MANAGING
BUSINESS
PROCESS
MANAGING
EARTHQAUKE
PROCESS
CAT
MANAGEMENT
PLATFORM
GIS
PLATFOR
M
7. DASK CAT MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
EARLY LOSS ASSESMENT
NOTIFICATION
ADJUSTER LOGISTICS
ADJUSTMENT
VALUATION
APPROVAL
PAYMENT
OPERATIONMANAGEMENT
RESOURCEMANAGEMENT
REPORT/COMPLAIN/
PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT
START
PR AND COMMUNICATION
EARLY ASSESMENT â
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
APPOINTMENT
COMMUNICATION WITH
PARTNERS
COORDINATION WITH
FINANCIAL INST
COORDINATON WITH PUBLIC
OFFCICES
FOLLOW UP
CAT RESPONSE PLAN
LOSS ASSESMENT/CLAIM
MANAGEMENT
âą Critical Discussion Point: Response
plans/Emergency Plans without enough
resources
âą Individual corporate/public planning
based on same resources is illusionary
capacity
âą 3 Pillars in TCIPâs Philosophy:
1. Ensure having robust platform
2. Develop committed capacity
3. Implement scenario based Cat
Response Plan
âą Investing in Cat Management,
especially for low frequency/high
severity events, may commercially be
unfeasible for predictable future
âą Not-investing in Cat Management, in
case of occurrence, may socially and
economically be fatal
LOSS
ASSESMENT
NOTIFICATIO
N
CLAIM
ADJUSTMENT
CONTINGENC
YCAPACITY
TRAINING
MODELS
DEDICATED
RESOURCES
TESTAND
IMPROVE
RESERVING
BUSINESS
PROCESS
8.
9. CAT MANAGEMENT
PLATFORM
Uydu
GörĂŒntĂŒlem
e ve Fark
Algılama
Ä°B1_DASK
Ä°nteraktif
Ä°B2_Operasy
onel
Verimlilik
Ä°B4_HasarYönetiĆim
2. Ă 3. Ă 4. Ă 5. Ă 6. ĂÄ°B Proje 1. Ă
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
Ä°B3_Etkin
Hazırlık
P7
P8
P9
P10
P11
P12
Ä°TĂ
Onay
Birim
Maliyetlendi
rme
Ä°zmir
Tasarım Algoritma
Hasar
Kategorizas
yon
TOBB Eksperleri
Bilgi Dosyası
Yeni Eksper
Bilgi
Dosyası
ĂĆB, AFAD, Ăniversiteler ve MĂŒhendislik Odaları ile GörĂŒĆmeler
EÄitim
İçerik
Yönetimi ve
Organizasy
onu
Konsolide Veri Modeli
Ä°Ć Kuralları ve Kontoller
Saha
Lojistik
Alternatifli
Aksiyon
Planlaması
Saha
Organizasy
on
Modelleme
si
Banka /
PTT ile
Mutabakat
Ădeme
Uygulaması
IVR
Sigortalı ve Aday
Sigortalı Mobil
Uygulaması
Sigortalı
Portalı
Modelleme
(BOUN)Hava ve
Sokak
GörĂŒntĂŒsĂŒ
Mobil
Eksper
Uygulaması
Analitik
Kapsamı
ve Analizi
Nakit AkıĆ
Planlaması
Hasar Uygulaması
**
2014* 2015*
Program
Planlaması
ve
Mobilizasyo
nu
Proje
ekiplerine
bilgi
aktarım ve
kapsam
detaylandır
ma
workshopâl
arı
Program
Yönetimi;
DeÄiĆim ve
Ä°letiĆim
Yönetimi
Veri Ambarı
Senkromiza
syonu ve
Optimizasy
onu
(Tasarımlar
ın
tamamlan
masını
takiben)
Veri
Modelleme,
BT Altyapı
ve Mimari
DeÄerlendir
me
Workshopla
rı (Program
boyunca)
Ăncelikli
Veri
TemizliÄi AFAD, ĂĆB ile ortak kaynak
kullanımı ve/veya
ortak eÄitim kapsamının ve
planının oluĆturulması
EÄitim
Stratejisi
EÄitim
Sertifikasyo
nu
Geocode
EÄitim
İçerik
GĂŒncelleme
leri
Hasar KPI
ve SLAâler
Eksper KPI
ve SLAâler
Hasar
Dashboard
Eksper
Dashboard
Haritalandır
ma ve Etki
Tahminlem
e
Poliçe
Entegrasyo
nu
Hasar
Kategorizas
yon
ModĂŒlĂŒ
GĂŒncelleme
si
Hızlandırıl
mıĆ
BaĆlangıç
P13
Eksper
Dashboard
GĂŒncelleme
si
Ăst
Yönetim
Raporlama
,U
RaporlamaveDataWarehouse
DıĆ
Entegrasyonlar
E-
Posta
Posta
ĂaÄrı
Merkez
i
IVR
Web
Portal
Mobil
Telefon
/ Fax
Ä°hbar
Dosya
DeÄerle
ndirme
RĂŒcu/So
vtaj
Dosya
Notları
Hasar
Kontakla
rı
Ćablonla
r
Suistima
l
Patternl
er
Ădemel
er
Tahsilatl
ar
Limit
Muafiyet
Muallak
Yönetimi
Eksper &
Performans
Yönetimi
E-posta
/ SMS
Görevl
er
Raporlam
a
Konfigura
syon
Hasar Destek
Fonksiyonları
Hasar
Yönetim
i
Finan
sallar
Hasar
Uygulama
sı
Ä°letiĆim
Kanalları
Ă
ı
k
tı
Poliçe
Sistemi
Ădeme
Sistemi
ReassĂŒra
ns
Sistemi
Risk
Yönetimi
Skorlama
Sistemi
İç
Entegrasy
onlar
Maliyetlen
dirme
Sistemi
Modelleme ve
Tahminleme
Uygulaması
Poli
çe
Sist
emi
Ăde
me
Sist
emi
Analitik ve
Veri
MadenciliÄi
Muha
sebe
Siste
mi
Risk
Yönetimi
Skorlama
Sistemi
DökĂŒman
Yönetimi
ArĆivleme
Ä°Ć
SĂŒreç/AkıĆ
Yönetimi
Olay
Tanımla
ma
CoÄrafi
Bilgi
Sistemleri
DönĂŒĆĂŒmle
r ve
Haritama
Modelleme ve
Tahminleme Uygulaması
Maliyetlendir
me Sistemi
Maliyetlend
irme
Standardiz
asyonu
Maliyetlend
irme
Kategoriza
syonu
Analitik ve Veri
MadenciliÄi Performans
ĂlĂ§ĂŒtleri
Veri
MadenciliÄi
Muhasebe
Sistemi
Ădeme
Sistemi
ReasĂŒrans
Sistemi
Hasar Uygulamasını Destekleyen Uygulamalar
ve Kurumsal Uygulamalar
Web
SatıĆ
(Vizy
onek
s)
T
A
P
U
Elektrik
Su
Dairesi
U
A
V
T
Sigorta
Ćirketleri
Acenteler
E-
Dev
let
Portföy
Yönetim
Ćirketleri
T
O
BB
Ban
ka
PT
T
TA
P
U
AF
A
D
C
BS
VE
DO
P
U
YA
P
Kan
dilli
Sist
emi
Eksper
Yönetimi
âą DASK designed the cat management
structure with improved procedures and
new model
âą Accentureâs study justified the target
model and provided implementation plan.
âą DASK preferred to built itâs model on the
renown platform, SAP
âą Local partner, Vizyoneks, is integrating
and developing the application together
with SAP
âą IBM is the program manager and
business modeller on behalf of DASK
10. NEW METHODOLOGIES AND PRINCIPLES
âą Big or small all losses shall be subject to adjustment
process
âą Multi level claim notification process
âą Severe earthquake: Reappointment
no claim notification is needed; every insured
apartment to be inspected
âą Moderate earthquake: Structured Appointment, if
more then %50 of insured apartments makes
notification, do the rest
âą Mild Earthquake: wait for notification
âą Multi-level Adjustment process is developed
âą Assessing Building
âą Inspecting the building (categorizing losses),
methodology is developed with universities,
scientifically proven, calibrated on small scale,
justified with similar methodologies
âą If likelihood of structural damage; send
authorized civil engineer
âą Assessing Insured apartment
âąInspecting insured apartment in the building
and calculating indemnity amount
âąAdjustment of areas in the building mutually
used
âą Multi-level operation is enabled
âą Mild earthquake: whole operation is run by DASK
employees
âą Moderate earthquake: sum operation may be run
by authorized professionals
âą Sever earthquake: major operation run by
authorized professionals and civil engineers to be
used for adjustment
âą Claim standardization tool is developed
âą All unit costs determined centrally
âą Claim adjusters to asses the damage, the tool to
calculate the indemnity amount
âą Not to train claim adjusters but teach to use tool
âą IVR, web and mobile to be used in the process
âą Insured to run the process without consulting live
agent
âą Simple and easy claim payment
âą Entegrate to the GIS Platform
âą To use GIS in claim operation
âą To assess collapsed building and survey field
âą To do resource allocation
â ACCURACY
â EFFICIENCY
â CUSTOMER LOYALTY
â CUSTOMER RETENTION
â NEGATIVE EXPERIENCE
â CYCLE TIME REDUCTIONS
â REDUCTION OF OPEN CLAIMS
â PAPERLESS CLAIM PROCESSING
â AUTOMATION OF FIELD ASSESMENT
â PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS
11. DASK CLAIM ADJSUTMENT PRINCIPALS
BEFORE EARTHQUAKE
IMMEDIATELY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
SHORTLY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
EARTHQUAKE OPERATION
EXCEL ON
MODELLING
EXCEL ON
ESTIMATION
EXCEL ON
DESKTOP LOSS ASSESMENT
EXCEL ON
CLAIM ADJUSTMENT
T-1T0T1T2
WHY AND HOW TO INTEGRATE GIS TECHNOLOGIES
AFTERSHOCKS
EXCEL ON
TRACKING THE FIELD
T3
RISK-BUILDING DAMAGE SEVERITY/FREQUENCY
EVENT-
SEVERITY/FREQUENCY
HEAVY DAMAGELIGHT DAMAGE
BIG /LIGHT BIG /HEAVY
SMALL/HEAVYSMALL/LIGHT
âą LOW EXPERTISE
âą LIMITED OPERATION
âą ORDINARY SCENARIO
âą HIGH EXPERTISE
âą LIMITED OPERATION
âą ORDINARY SCENARIO
âą HIGH EXPERTISE
âą HUGE OPERATION
âą EXTREME SCENARIO
âą CONTINGENCY
CAPACITY
âą LOW EXPERTISE
âą HUGE OPERATIN
âą EXTREME SCENARIO
âą CONTINGENCY
CAPACITY
BIG
EVENT
SMALL
EVENT
T°
TÂč
TÂČ
âą Continuous tracking of the field is
necessary for claim adjustment
âą Different levels of expertise and
resources needed for different scenarios
âą More operational capacity needed as
the event gets bigger
âą More expertise need for structural
damages, regardless of number of
buildings
âą Characteristics of the event may get
worse due to subsequent
events/aftershocks
âą The plan should allow to change the
scenarios during operation
âą Timing of field deployment is critical
sooner/later to be in the field for
operation
âą Early field assessment is critical in
planning
EARTHQUAKE
PROCESS
12. BENEFITS OF GIS
GIS FOR PLANNING AND OPERATION
BEFORE EARTHQUAKE
IMMEDIATELY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
SHORTLY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
EARTHQUAKE OPERATION
EXCEL ON
MODELLING
EXCEL ON
ESTIMATION
EXCEL ON
DESKTOP LOSS ASSESMENT
EXCEL ON
CLAIM ADJUSTMENT
T-1T0T1T2
WHY AND HOW TO INTEGRATE GIS TECHNOLOGIES
AFTERSHOCKS
EXCEL ON
TRACKING THE FIELD
T3
LIQUAFACTION EXPOSURE MAPLANDSLIDE EXPOSURE MAP
13. 1-Boundaries of cadastral parcels with parcel numbers
2-Building polygons
3-House number points
4-Road lines with road names
5-Digital Elevation Model
6-Aerial imagery with 30cm resolution
7-Satellite imagery with 50cm resolution
8-Administrative boundaries
9-Boundaries of building blocks
10-Points of interest
11-Settlement suitability map
12-Geology map /1/2000
13-Geology map 1/25000
14-Earthquake Zoning Map of Turkey
15-Building damage estimation based on the Marmara Earthquake scenario
16-Injury and loss estimation based on the Marmara Earthquake scenario
17-Acceleration estimation based on the Marmara Earthquake scenario
TRANSFORM INFORMATION INTO KNOWLEDGE
DATA FROM VARIOUS SOURCES ARE COMBINED IN ONE GEOSPATIAL
TOOL
CROSS USE OF INFORMATION
BEFORE EARTHQUAKE
IMMEDIATELY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
SHORTLY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
EARTHQUAKE OPERATION
EXCEL ON
MODELLING
EXCEL ON
ESTIMATION
EXCEL ON
DESKTOP LOSS ASSESMENT
EXCEL ON
CLAIM ADJUSTMENT
T-1T0T1T2
WHY AND HOW TO INTEGRATE GIS TECHNOLOGIES
AFTERSHOCKS
EXCEL ON
TRACKING THE FIELD
T3
14. BEFORE EARTHQUAKE: USE SCENARIOS FOR LOSS MODELING AFTER EARTHQUAKE: RUN EVENT PARAMETERS FOR LOSS
ASSESMENT
GIS FOR LOSS ESTIMATION AND OPERATIONAL USE
FINANCIAL/OPERATIONAL
LOSS ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL/OPERATIONAL
LOSS ANALYSIS
BEFORE EARTHQUAKE
IMMEDIATELY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
SHORTLY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
EARTHQUAKE OPERATION
EXCEL ON
MODELLING
EXCEL ON
ESTIMATION
EXCEL ON
DESKTOP LOSS ASSESMENT
EXCEL ON
CLAIM ADJUSTMENT
T-1T0T1T2
WHY AND HOW TO INTEGRATE GIS TECHNOLOGIES
AFTERSHOCKS
EXCEL ON
TRACKING THE FIELD
T3
FINANCIAL CAPACITY PLANNING OPERATIONAL CAPACITY
PLANNING
15. URBAN CHANGE DETECTION USING SATELLITE IMAGES TO SUPPORT RAPID EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
Disaster preparedness (pre-disaster)
Analysis of the financial risk exposure
Determination of the resource needs for disaster response
Planning of the response operations
Disaster response (post-disaster)
Quick determination of the extend of the damage
Organization of the disaster response teams
Supporting claim management operations
CHANGE DETECTION AND POST PROCESSING MANAGEMENT BEFORE EARTHQUAKE
IMMEDIATELY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
SHORTLY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
EARTHQUAKE OPERATION
EXCEL ON
MODELLING
EXCEL ON
ESTIMATION
EXCEL ON
DESKTOP LOSS ASSESMENT
EXCEL ON
CLAIM ADJUSTMENT
T-1T0T1T2
WHY AND HOW TO INTEGRATE GIS TECHNOLOGIES
AFTERSHOCKS
EXCEL ON
TRACKING THE FIELD
T3
16. MANAGING ADJUSTMENT PROCESS IN CHAOS BEFORE EARTHQUAKE
IMMEDIATELY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
SHORTLY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
EARTHQUAKE OPERATION
EXCEL ON
MODELLING
EXCEL ON
ESTIMATION
EXCEL ON
DESKTOP LOSS ASSESMENT
EXCEL ON
CLAIM ADJUSTMENT
T-1T0T1T2
WHY AND HOW TO INTEGRATE GIS TECHNOLOGIES
AFTERSHOCKS
EXCEL ON
TRACKING THE FIELD
T3
âą Aerial Technologies; good for
general/early assestment but
not enough for operational
management
âą Need to have more data
about field
âą remote sensing,
âą omnidirectional imaging
âą Earthquake: not a friendly
environment
âą Scarce capacity
âą Racing against time
DATA MANAGEMENT
MAPPING
LOSS ASSESMENT
PRIORITIZATION
PATH OPTIMIZATION
DATA CAPTURING
UNCERTINITY ESTIMATION
BUSINESS ANALYSIS
PLANNING/CONTINUATION
17. BEFORE EARTHQUAKE
IMMEDIATELY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
SHORTLY AFTER
EARTHQUAKE
EARTHQUAKE OPERATION
EXCEL ON
MODELLING
EXCEL ON
ESTIMATION
EXCEL ON
DESKTOP LOSS ASSESMENT
EXCEL ON
CLAIM ADJUSTMENT
T-1T0T1T2
WHY AND HOW TO INTEGRATE GIS TECHNOLOGIES
AFTERSHOCKS
EXCEL ON
TRACKING THE FIELD
T3
RISK-BUILDING DAMAGE SEVERITY/FREQUENCY
EVENT-
SEVERITY/FREQUENCY
HEAVY DAMAGELIGHT DAMAGE
BIG /LIGHT BIG /HEAVY
SMALL/HEAVYSMALL/LIGHT
âą LOW EXPERTISE
âą LIMITED OPERATION
âą ORDINARY SCENARIO
âą HIGH EXPERTISE
âą LIMITED OPERATION
âą ORDINARY SCENARIO
âą HIGH EXPERTISE
âą HUGE OPERATION
âą EXTREME SCENARIO
âą CONTINGENCY
CAPACITY
âą LOW EXPERTISE
âą HUGE OPERATIN
âą EXTREME SCENARIO
âą CONTINGENCY
CAPACITY
BIG
EVENT
SMALL
EVENT
T°
TÂč
TÂČ
âą After shocks requires continous
follow up on damage development
âą Aftershock may restart whole
operation from the beginning
âą Should we cease operation untill
the aftershocks!!
WHAT IF ANOTHER EARTHQUAKE STRIKES??
18. WEB BASED CLAIM ASSESMENT
TOOL
ORTO PHOTO PROJECTS
âą Transparent, simple adjusting tool
âą Developing tool for standard claim
assessment
âą Control/monitor unit cost of construction
âą Obtain Customer Compromise
âą Prevent redundancy
ONGOING PROJECTS
âą Supporting whole event-chain before-
during-after earthquake
âą Enabling using contingency capacity
âą Allowing multi layer hierarchy
TRAINING PROJECT
WITH ANKARA UNIVERSITY
AND TSEV
âą Develop Contingency Claim Adjusting
Capacity
âą Train Civil Engineers for extreme necessity
âą Achieve mutual understanding/application
of claim assessment
âą Prevent redundancy between Institutions
CENTER OF RISK REDUCTION
STUDIES
WITH EARTHQUAKE
FOUNDATION
STUDY OF REVISING TURKEYâS
SISMIC HAZARD MAP
SPONSORED TOGETHER WITH
AFAD
FIELD STUDY WITH GFZ
âą Workshop on to improve street view
methodology and collecting building
inventory
âą Signed a protocol for collaboration on
developing modeling, assessment, rating
capabilities and other scientific projects
âą AFAD and TCIP is sponsoring to revise
Hazard Map
MEMBER AND COLLABORATER