This presentation was made to The Future of Legal Education Workshop hosted by Griffith University's Law Futures Centre on 1 November 2017. It suggests that Australian legal education research over the last decade has positioned us well for an uncertain future. While our Law Schools cannot afford to be complacent, especially given the increasing automation of legal work and the unbundling of legal services, the strong research and evidence base to which Australian legal educators may refer provides a degree of optimism for an uncertain future. Critically, this must be a joint endeavour that engages all branches of the legal profession and the Academy working together. Students and young lawyers in particular have a vital role to play in shaping the future of their professional education. In the absence of an #OLTphoenix, Australian legal education is well-placed to be self-sustaining and self-generating.
The abstract for the session was as follows:
In 2017, Australian legal education finds itself at a crossroads. In common with its disciplinary brethren, it is being impacted by the multitude challenges and volatile policy environment facing the Australian higher education sector more broadly. As for the rest of the Academy also, Law Schools are being squeezed on numerous fronts in their quest to fund pedagogical innovation. In the meantime, law students, who continue to bear a disproportionately high percentage of their degree costs, find themselves entering an extremely competitive job market with reduced employment opportunities. And of potentially even greater import, the disruptive innovation being felt in universities is also now impacting the legal services industry itself, so much so that the halcyon days of Priestley’s dead hand (or light hand, depending on your perspective) finally look to be drawing to a close.
This presentation will review Australian legal education’s pedagogical progress over the last decade through a scholarship lens and ask how is legal education positioned in 2017 for an uncertain future? In the absence of a national body such as the Office for Learning and Teaching (OLT), which was de-funded in mid-2016, is Australian legal education research and scholarship sufficiently mature to be self-sustaining and self-generating? At the risk of being overly optimistic, it will be suggested that, in an era of stackable credentials, the quality of Australian legal education generally ranks amongst the best in the world and is well-positioned to prepare its students to take their place, personally and professionally, as global citizens in complex and dynamic legal and other workplaces.
Australian Legal Education in 2017: Taking Stock for an Uncertain Future
1. Australian Legal Education in 2017:
Taking Stock for an Uncertain Future
Professor Sally Kift PFHEA
President, Australian Learning &Teaching Fellows
Discipline Scholar: Law
James Cook University
@KiftSally
2. Taking Stock…
• Context is everything
• (Counterintuitively perhaps) Looking back to move forward
• Harvesting a rich history
• What else have we got?
• What are the legal educ research opportunities: eg
• Modelling disruptive pedagogy
• How to bring the profession with us
• Micro-credentialing
• A more diverse profession
• The career piece – Graduate Employability 2.0
• …
• A couple of things to watch
• Are the kids alright (per Fiona McLeod SC)?
3. There’s a bit of context going on!
“Andrew Norton, Director of the
Higher Education Program at the
Grattan Institute, has analysed the
department's data, which shows
that while a social work student
would pay only 38 per cent of their
total course fee in 2017, a law
student would pay 84 per cent.”
http://www.abc.net.au/news/factcheck/2017-06-14/fact-check-do-taxpayers-subsidise-over-half-higher-education/8605406
7. “The disruption under way in higher educations isn’t just about technology, though today’s students
are increasingly “digital” in terms of how and where they prefer to learn.
It’s also about students as customers who have clear expectations about what their university
experience should be, and who are holding institutions to account when they fail to meet those
expectations.”
1 November 2017
http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/productivity-review/report/productivity-review.pdfhttp://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education
10. Unbundling the business of law: Lawyer Work cf Legal Work
…strategy, creativity,
judgment and empathy
…those efforts cannot
yet be automated.
“What clients don’t
want to pay for is any
routine work...the
trouble is that
technology makes more
and more work routine.”
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-future-of-the-professions-9780198713395?cc=au&lang=en&
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/19/technology/lawyers-artificial-intelligence.html
19 March 2017
11. http://legalmosaic.com/2017/09/28/who-will-train-tomorrows-lawyers-and-how-will-they-learn/#
“The legal industry is an ecosystem; there’s
an inter-dependency between and among
its elements. So, for example, when clients
sneeze, law firms catch a cold; law schools
get the flu; and law students contract
pneumonia.”
September 28, 2017
The legal industry is an ecosystem…
A recent American Lawyer article, “Pay for
Associate Hours? More Companies Say ‘No
Thanks’”… quoted from a speech by Mark
Smolik, the general counsel of DHL Supply
Chain Americas, saying he would no longer
subsidize on-the-job-training of law firm
associates…
Mr. Smolik’s remark…is an indictment of the
Academy for its failure to produce practice-
ready graduates with required skillsets and a
swipe at law firms for their failure to more fully
invest in associate training to drive client value.
13. References a [US] model of legal education
that has been superseded in Aust (to
varying degrees) for some years now …
• One summative (cf formative)
assessment (final exam)
• Lack of constant feedback
• Only recent moves towards
adopting learning outcomes
& new methods of assessment
(for and of learning).
• Limited blended/online
learning/modules.
• Minimal practical training.
https://www.christenseninstitute.org/publications/disrupting-law-school/
BUT no cause for complacency…
Law schools have three possible paths:
1. Launch autonomous models to pioneer
disruptions
2. Use online learning as a sustaining innovation to
improve current practice
3. Specialize by creating programs that allow JD
2016
15. What themes emerge from all of this?
• New knowledge, skills & attitudes
• New(Law) professionalism (eg, ways of working, flexibility, more diversity)
• Course architecture:
• [More] Online/blended; modules/micro-credentials; specialization; core/elective
• Focus on ethical standards & judgment, interpersonal skills, criticality, creativity…
• Inter-disciplinarity (& collaboration to enable)
• Resilience, mental health & wellbeing
• Agentic career management
• Practice-ready grads, in whom law firms must further invest
• Reimagine accreditation requirements, including assuring CPE/CPD
16. (creative production)
(self-actualising)
(participating)(learning)
(critical use)
Digital capabilities: the 6 elements defined
(JISC, 2015)
Higher education
institutions have a key
part to play in
supporting graduates to
be able to interact with
digital technologies in
their professional and
personal lives
(Littlejohn et. al., 2012).
http://digitalcapability.jiscinvolve.org/wp/files/2015/06
/1.-Digital-capabilities-6-elements.pdf
Digital Capabilities/Literacies
17. How has our legal education
research positioned us for an
uncertain future?
24. TLOs: Bachelor of Laws (and JD)
Six (6) Threshold Learning Outcomes
• Knowledge
• Ethics & professional responsibility
• Thinking Skills
• Research Skills
• Communication & collaboration
• Self-management
http://disciplinestandards.pbworks.com/w/page/52746378/Law
TLO 1: Knowledge (LLB, JD)
Graduates of the Bachelor of Laws will demonstrate an
understanding of a coherent body of knowledge that includes:
Graduates of the Juris Doctor will demonstrate an advanced
and integrated understanding of a complex body of knowledge
that includes:
(a) the fundamental areas of legal knowledge, the Australian
legal system, and underlying principles and concepts,
including international and comparative contexts,
(b) the broader contexts within which legal issues arise, and
(c) the principles and values of justice and of ethical practice in
lawyers’ roles, and
(d) Contemporary developments in law, and its professional
practice
30. https://sra.org.uk/home/hot-topics/Solicitors-Qualifying-Examination.page
No law degree required: SQE will assess
“necessary knowledge & skills to qualify”
No PLT course required
• Take SQE stage 1 before work-based experience;
SQE stage 2 at end of work experience.
No training contract required
• Currently 2yr pre-admission training contract
required; seen as “barrier”, “real block on
numbers & diversity”
• Replace with 2yr Qualifying Work Experience to
“socialise candidates into the legal profession,
expose them to ethical problems, and make sure
that they have the opportunity to develop the
competencies set out in the competency
statement.”
• Enables “equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI)”
31. The Regulatory Risk…
• Complexity; multiple layers; lack of harmonization & uniformity; agililty
• Whither Priestley 11 (given FLIP et al)?
• Core/Elective split if non-law areas?
• Opportunity to specialise [& beyond… to be “techno-legals” who code; data
scientists; legal solutions architects; & the like]
• Need to be careful not to mis-step: is a SRA-type test the best response?
• Too quickly dated? Stifle (rather than support) disruptive influences?
• NewLaw knowledge, skills & values.
LLB & JD TLOs good threshold starting point, especially given
(1) harmonization & (2) need for flexibility re developments
https://geneticliteracyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Screen-Shot-2017-03-24-at-8.58.11-AM-405x405.png
42. ANU,
Canberra
City U.,
London
Plymouth U.
Northeastern U.,
Boston
ANU,
Canberra
ANU,
Canberra
Deakin Uni,
Melbourne
The Law Teacher,
Special Issue,
2016
http://www.tandfonline.com.elibrary.jcu.
edu.au/toc/ralt20/50/1?nav=tocList
43. • Need for a more diverse/representative profession (SRA – “EDI”)
However, Southgate (2017, 23-24):
• Law [& Medical Studies] have poor LSES participation (in both UG & PG).
• Law also has low participation rates for those from regional backgrounds.
• Students from equity groups “far more likely to be enrolled in high-status degrees in less
elite universities”. These students make up a “remarkably small percentage of their FoE
cohort in Go8 universities in particular. From an equity perspective, such patterns of
unequal distribution require concerted attention.”
• Graduate numbers (7583 in 2015 (CALD, 2016)) & career development advice
• LESS trad permanent staff; MORE non-trad & transient “Supertemps”
• What about JD vs LLB???
• growth in JD numbers (from 10.8% of grads 2014 to 16.5% in 2017 (Carter, 2017))
• Good news story – esp re diversity and access to justice if a driver
Other legal ed research possibilities:
https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Southgate_Fair-connection-to-professional-careers.pdf
44. 46
Higher education, graduate
employability and social
networks
http://www.graduateemployability2-0.com/
“Professional networks have a vital
role to play in various aspects of
career development, innovation and
problem-solving processes, and
socially-based learning.”