Assessing the economic and environmental benefits adusumilli
•
1 gefällt mir•246 views
71st SWCS International Annual Conference July 24-27, 2016 Louisville, KY
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Andere mochten auch
Ähnlich wie Assessing the economic and environmental benefits adusumilli
Ähnlich wie Assessing the economic and environmental benefits adusumilli (20)
Mehr von Soil and Water Conservation Society
Mehr von Soil and Water Conservation Society (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Assessing the economic and environmental benefits adusumilli
- 1. Assessing the Economic and Environmental Benefits and Costs of Cover Crops in Cotton Production System in Northwest Louisiana Naveen Adusumilli, Water Economist, LSU Agricultural Center, nadusumilli@agcenter.lsu.edu Daniel Fromme, Corn and Cotton Specialist, LSU Agricultural Center, DFromme@agcenter.lsu.edu 71st SWCS International Annual Conference July 24-27, 2016. Louisville, KY
- 2. The Tool… • Cover crop economics tool, an excel spreadsheet based economic assessment tool (NRCS) Cost categories Benefit categories • Cover crop seed • Nutrient credits • Planting • Chemical inputs reduction • Termination • Yield increase • Management • Reduced erosion • Long term soil fertility improvement • Long term improved water storage and infiltration capacity of soils • Net Present Value is used to estimate long-term profitability
- 3. Cover Crop data Study title Year Study duration Location Soil type The long term effects of winter cover crops on cotton production in Northwest Louisiana 1991 1973-1988 Bossier City, LA Sandy Loam Tillage and cover crops affect cotton growth and yield and soil organic matter 1997 1987-1996 Winnsboro, LA Silt loam Effects of tillage systems and winter cover crops on yield and maturity of cotton on a loess soil in Northeast Louisiana 1993 1987-1992 Winnsboro, LA Silt Loam Cotton yield and growth responses to tillage and cover crops on sharkey clay 1993 1989-1992 St. Joseph, LA Sharkey clay
- 4. Erosion reduction calculation! • Value of soil productivity for the Delta states (Louisiana, Arkansas, and Mississippi) as $0.43/ton, estimated in 1990 dollars, which is $0.71/ton in 2015 dollars • Value of reduced costs of removing sediments is $0.12/ton in 2007 dollars, which is $0.14/ton in 2015 dollars • Annual soil loss per acre per year in Louisiana, which is 2.32 tons/acre/year Hansen L, Ribaudo M (2008) Economic measures of soil conservation benefits. TB-1922. Economic Research Service, USDA.
- 5. No Till vs Conventional Till Study duration Location Soil type Cover crop(s) evaluated Costs of planting and terminating cover crops, $/acre Benefits, $/acre Short-term Long-term Total Net 1987- 1996 Winnsboro , LA Silt loam Hairy vetch No Till $62 $52 $38 $90 $28 C-Till $84 $14 $32 $46 -$38 1987- 1992 Winnsboro , LA Silt Loam Hairy vetch No Till $65 $61 $32 $93 $28 C-Till $85 $41 $40 $81 -$4
- 6. Study duration Location Soil type Cover crop(s) evaluated Costs of planting and terminating cover crops, $/acre Benefits,$/acre Short-ter m Long-term Total Net 1989- 1992 St. Joseph, LA Sharkey clay Hairy vetch No-Till $70 $48 $12 $60 -$10 C-Till $83 $123 $11 $135 $52 1973- 1988 Bossier City, LA Sandy Loam Hairy vetch No-Till C-Till $120 $139 $30 $169 $49 No Till vs Conventional Till
- 7. The Tool… • Cover crop economics tool, an excel spreadsheet based economic assessment tool (NRCS) Cost categories Benefit categories • Cover crop seed • Nutrient credits • Planting • Chemical inputs reduction • Termination • Yield increase • Management • Reduced erosion • Long term soil fertility improvement • Long term improved water storage and infiltration capacity of soils • Net Present Value is used to estimate long-term profitability
- 8. What’s next!!! • A choice to have tillage system benefit accounted • Do these benefits vary by soil type – Could Be!! • Moisture retention benefit premium by soil type, tillage system, and cover crop • Carbon benefit premium by cover crop, tillage system
- 9. What can change!!! • Unified message is missing!! • In face of climate challenges a cost-share structure that recognizes agronomic and environmental benefits • Currently, the national program relies on covering production related costs. In most cases, that incentive amounts to $70 per acre. • A recent change has increased the period of participation for farmers from three years to five years. • Although such improvements can be useful, a comprehensive approach in developing incentive payments accounting for the on- site and off-site benefits is needed.