unwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabi
FP7 Energy
1. Support to Research and
Technological Development
and innovation Initiative and
Strategies in Jordan
Writing Proposals and Partner Search for
FP7 Energy Thematic Area
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
SRTD is an EU
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
funded programme
2. Agenda
• Overview of the calls: research priorities, objectives
• International Cooperation
• FP7 Rules of participation
• Call for Proposals FP7-ENERGY-2011-1 general call focusing on research with a
long-term horizon & FP7-ENERGY-2011-2 general call focusing on research with a
short-term horizon and on demonstration
• Call for Proposals FP7-2011-NMP-ENV-ENERGY-ICT-EeB cross-thematic call on
energy-efficient buildings in the context of the European Economic Recovery Plan
• Call for Proposals FP7-NMP-ENERGY-2011 joint call together with Theme 4 – NMP
Nanosciences, Nanotechnologies, Materials and new Production Technologies on
innovative photovoltaic cell processes and architectures
• Cordis - the Community Research and Development Information Service
• CORDIS EPSS part A & B
• Preparation, Submission and Evaluation of the Proposals
• FP Energy projects - Case study example(s)
• Partners at CORDIS Service and other networking sources
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
3. FP7 Energy
Overview of the calls:
research priorities, objectives
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
SRTD is an EU
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
funded programme
4. Content
Policy context and SET-Plan
Energy Theme in the 7th Framework Programme
Work Programme 2011
Calls 2011
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
5. EU Strategic Policy
Objectives
Energy and Climate policy (2020 targets)
– Reduce greenhouse gases emissions
– Increase energy security
– Promote EU competitiveness
Europe 2020 – smart, sustainable and inclusive growth
Flagship Initiative: “Resource efficient Europe” calls to complete
the internal energy market and implement the strategic energy
technologies (SET) Plan.
Economic recovery
– Launch of Public Private Partnerships
– PPP on Energy Efficient Buildings (EeB)
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
6. SET-Plan – Technology Pillar of EU
Energy and Climate Change Policy
Objective
– Accelerate innovation in cutting edge European low-carbon
– technologies to facilitate the achievements of the 2020 targets
and 2050 vision
Main elements
– Broad technology development, identification of key sectors
– New approach - joint strategic planning
– Increase in resources - financial & human
– Reinforced international cooperation
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
7. SET-Plan – Technology Pillar of EU
Energy and Climate Change Policy
Communication “Investing in the development of low-
carbon technologies (SET-Plan)" adopted on October
7th 2009, calls to:
– Focus existing programmes on the SET-Plan initiatives and the
associated technological roadmaps for 2010-2020
– Increase in R&D investments
Supported by:
– European Parliament (Resolution - 11 March 2010)
– Energy Council (Conclusions - 12 March 2010)
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
8. Essence of the European
Industrial Initiatives
Industry leadership
– Strengthen industrial participation, boost innovation and
accelerate
– deployment of low-carbon energy technologies. Sectors where
the
– barriers, the scale of investment and the risk involved can be
better
– tackled collectively
No predetermined model
– Structure of implementation with variable geometry participation
and
– light non-bureaucratic governance
Public Private Partnerships for innovation
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
9. European Industrial
Initiatives (EIIs)
4 EIIs launched in June 2010
– Wind; Solar; Electricity Grid; Carbon capture and storage
– Joint Statement from Commission, Council Presidency, members
of the Steering Group and high-level representatives of the
industry
2 EIIs to be launched in 2010
– Bio-energy; Sustainable nuclear fission (Gen IV)
1 EII under elaboration – launch in 2011
– Smart cities
On-going initiatives:
– Fuel cells and hydrogen (JTI)
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
13. Industry's goals 2020
• Up to 20% of the EU electricity produced by wind.
• Up to 15% of the EU electricity will be generated by
solar.
• 50% of networks in Europe operate along “smart
principle” effectively matching supply and demand.
• At least 14% of the EU energy mix from cost-
competitive, sustainable bio-energy.
• CCS technologies become cost-competitive within a
carbon-pricing environment.
• 25 to 30 European cities at the forefront of the
transition to a low carbon economy.
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
14. European Energy Research
Alliance - SET Plan’s Research
Community Pillar
Key objectives:
• Conceive and implement high quality joint
programmes of research in support of the SET-Plan
priorities.
• Work towards a long term, durable integration of
dispersed research capacities across the EU.
• Develop links and sustained partnerships with
industry.
• Develop training, education and outreach activities.
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
15. European Energy Research
Alliance - State of Play
Founded in 2008 by a number of leading research
institutes - participation open to all research
organisations
Four Joint Programmes launched in June 2010:
– Solar Photovoltaic
– Smart Grids
– Wind Energy
– Geothermal Energy
Further Joint Programmes under preparation: Materials
for Nuclear, Concentrated Solar Power, Carbon Capture
and Storage, Bio Energy, Fuel Cells and Smart Cities.
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
16. Energy Research
• Increasing the research investments
• FP7 (excellence in research)
• SET-plan (joint programming)
• Innovation
• Partnerships with the industry - PPP
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
17. Work Programme (WP)
• WP legal basis is the Cooperation Specific
Programme, which sets the overall scope and
objectives and, broadly speaking, the subjects to be
covered.
• WP is revised annually and constitutes the basis of
annual Calls for Proposals.
• WP Terminology:
– Theme (Energy)
– Activity (nine in the Energy Theme)
– Area (in general stable throughout FP7)
– Topic (subjects open for proposals in the calls, only
in the year in question)
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
18. 2011 Calls Content
For each topic:
– content/scope
– funding scheme
– expected impact
– any other pertinent information
– call ID
When appropriate:
– An indication of expected project duration
– Maximum EU contribution
– Third country participation
– Number of projects that might be funded
Expected impact will be used during the evaluation as
described at area/topic level or in the call fiche.
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
19. Calls 2011 - Date of publication: 20 July 2010
SET–Plan Initiatives
FP7-ENERGY-2011-1: focus on research with a long-term horizon
– Deadline: 16 November 2010
– Two-stage evaluation procedure
– Indicative budget: EUR 74 M
FP7-ENERGY-2011-2: focus on research with a short-term horizon and on
demonstration
– Deadline: 07 April 2011
– Single-stage submission and evaluation procedure
– Indicative budget: EUR 137 M
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
20. Calls 2011 - Date of publication: 20 July 2010
Cross-thematic calls
FP7-OCEAN-2011: joint call on ocean research - two energy topics:
• Multi-use offshore platforms
• Knowledge-base and tools for an integrated management of the
Mediterranean and the Black Sea marine and maritime activities
FP7-2011-NMP-ENV-ENERGY-ICT-EeB: call on energy-efficient buildings –
one energy topic:
• Demonstration of very low energy new buildings
FP7-NMP-ENERGY-2011 – one topic:
• Development and up scaling of innovative photovoltaic cell
• processes and architectures to pilot-linescale for industrial application
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
21. Calls 2011 - Date of publication: 20 July 2010
International Cooperation
FP7-ENERGY-2011-JAPAN: coordinated call on photovoltaics
• Parallel Japanese proposal submitted to NEDO.
FP7-ENERGY-2011-EXCHANGE: call for International Research Staff
Exchange in the field of energy research (USA and Japan)
• Partners from either the US or Japan.
ERA - NET
• FP7-ERANET-2011-RTD: joint call of all FP7 themes
• ERA-NETs in the field of Geothermal and Ocean Energy
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
22. Gateway to information:
http://cordis.europa.eu/en/home.html
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
23. FP7 Energy
International Cooperation
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
SRTD is an EU
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
funded programme
35. Advice
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
36. FP7 Energy
FP7 Rules of participation
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
SRTD is an EU
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
funded programme
55. Gateway to information:
http://cordis.europa.eu/en/home.html
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
56. FP7 Energy
FP7-ENERGY-2011-1
Research with a long-term horizon
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
SRTD is an EU
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
funded programme
60. Area 2.3: RESe Wind
Topic 2.3.2 : Development of design tools for Offshore
Wind farm clusters
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
61. Area 2.5: RESe CSP
Topic 2.5.1 : Thermal energy storage for CSP plants
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
62. Area 2.5: RESe CSP
Topic 2.5.2 : Advanced heat transfer fluids for CSP
technology
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
63. Area 3.7: RESe
Cross-Cutting issues
Topic 3.7.1 : Development of new or improved
sustainable bio-energy carriers
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
64. Area 4.1: Low/Medium
temperature solar thermal energy
Topic 4.1.1 : Revisiting solar-thermal systems for using
breakthroughs in scientific and technological fields
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
65. Area 5.1: CO2 Capture
Topic 5.1.1 : High efficiency post combustion solvent
based capture processes
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
66. Area 5.2: CO2 Storage
Topic 5.2.1 : Understanding the long term fate of
geological stored CO2
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
67. Area 7.2: Pan-European Energy
Networks
Topic 7.2.1 : Innovative tools for the future coordinated and stable
operation of pan-European electricity transmission systems
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
68. Area 7.2: Pan-European Energy
Networks
Topic 7.2.2 : Innovative strategies and tools for reliability
assessment of the Pan-European electricity transmission network
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
69. Area 7.3: Cross-Cutting issues
and technologies
Topic 7.3.1 : Network of projects developing the future European
electricity networks
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
70. Two stages Evaluation procedure
Stage 1 – “outline proposals”
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
72. Advice
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
73. FP7 Energy
FP7-ENERGY-2011-2
Research with a short-term horizon
and on demonstration
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
SRTD is an EU
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
funded programme
103. Gateway to information:
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
104. FP7 Energy
FP7-ENERGY-2011-NMP-ENERGY joint call with
Theme 4 – NMP Nanosciences,
Nanotechnologies, Materials and new
Production technologies on innovative
photovoltaic cell process and architectures
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
SRTD is an EU
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
funded programme
105. NMP – Energy
General aspects (1)
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
106. NMP – Energy
General aspects (2)
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
108. NMP – Energy
Documentation
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
109. Gateway to information:
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
110. CORDIS
the Community Research and
Development information Service
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
SRTD is an EU
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
funded programme
111. CORDIS: Research funding
Language
selection
Sub-menu
6 thematic sections
Daily news Recent
enhancements
http://cordis.europa.eu/en/home.html
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
112. CORDIS FP7 Service
– key features
Thematic
colour
coding
Main Presentation by
navigation type of user
Spotlight Principal themes
feature (colour coded)
Latest news &
forthcoming
events
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
113. All FP7 calls on one page: ‘Find a call’
http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/dc/index.cfm
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
114. The Cooperation Programme:
Navigating to a specific field of interest,
e.g. Energy
Amman, 1-5 August 2010 5
117. Scroll down to the
information package…
Amman, 1-5 August 2010 http://eramed.ekt.gr
118. ….and select..
- the call fiche
- the work
programme
- the relevant guide
for applicants
Then download them or have
them sent to your email
address
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
125. CORDIS FP7 - Find a document:
http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/find-doc_en.htm
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
126. CORDIS:
EU research activities
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
127. CORDIS –
Information services
Amman, 1-5 August 2010 http://eramed.ekt.gr
128. CORDIS:
National and regional activities
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
129. CORDIS –
Interactive services
Amman, 1-5 August 2010 http://eramed.ekt.gr
130. Partners service:
http://cordis.europa.eu/partners-service/
Amman, 1-5 August 2010 http://eramed.ekt.gr
131. Register as an expert for proposal evaluation
https://cordis.europa.eu/emmfp7/index.cfm?
fuseaction=wel.welcome
Amman, 1-5 August 2010 http://eramed.ekt.gr
132. CORDIS E-mail alert - QuickPick
E-mail alert on new CORDIS
content contained in
standard menu
http://cordis.europa.eu/guidance/quickpick_en.html
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
http://eramed.ekt.gr
133. CORDIS E-mail alert - RAPIDUS
Save / e-mail alert for searches: e.g. ‘Laser’ in News Advanced Search
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
http://cordis.europa.eu/guidance/rapidus_en.html
http://eramed.ekt.gr
134. Thank you
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
135. EPSS and « Part A »
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
SRTD is an EU
Amman, 1-5 August 2010 funded programme
136. Preparation and
Submission of Proposals
(EPSS)
EPSS preparation and submission guide:
http://cordis.europa.eu/documents/doc
umentlibrary/2812EN.pdf
https://www.epss-fp7.org/epss/
137. Form A1 - Content
Proposal title
Duration in months
Topic code
Free keywords
Abstract (max. 2000 words)
140. Form A3.1 : Budget for the
partner and for the
coordinator
Vertical Topics
Personnel costs
Subcontracting
Other direct costs
Indirect costs
Lump sum, flat-rate or scale unit (option only for ICPC)
Total budget
Requested EC contribution
Total receipts
Horizontal Topics
RTD
Demonstration
Coordination
Support
Management
Other
Total
141. Form A3.2 : Global
Budget
Vertical Topics
Coordinator
Partners
Horizontal Topics
Organisation country
RTD
Demonstration
Training
Coordination
Support
Management
Other
Total
Total receipts
Requested EC contribution
143. EPSS « Part B »
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
Amman, 1-5 August 2010 SRTD is an EU
funded programme
144. General Advice to
write part B
• Follow the template given in the Guide for applicants
• Make it easy to read:
– Short sentences
– Clear enunciation (use the Anglo-Saxon style!)
– Use bullet point, schemes, etc.
• Respect the rules:
– Font size
– Page restriction
– Overall project weight
• PDF document
– Be careful with conversion, etc.
– Black & white copies – use colours carefully
• Use EPSS
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
145. Cover Page
• Proposal full title
• Proposal acronym
• Type of funding scheme:
– Collaborative Project, Network of Excellence, Coordination Action,
Support Actions, etc.
– If a distinction is made in the call, indicate: (i) Small or medium-
scale focused research project; (ii). Large-scale integrating project;
(iii) Project targeted to special groups such as SMEs and other
smaller actors
• Work programme topics addressed:
(if more than one, indicate their order of importance to the project)
• Name of the coordinating person:
• List of participants:
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
146. Table of Contents
1. Scientific and/or technical quality, relevant to the topics addressed
by the call
1.1 Concept and objectives
1.2 Progress beyond the state-of-the-art
1.3 S/T methodology and associated work plan
Tables, Gantt chart, Pert diagram
2. Implementation
2.1 Management structure and procedures
2.2 Individual participants
2.3 Consortium as a whole
2.4 Resources to be committed
3. Impact
3.1 Expected impacts listed in the work programme
3.2 Dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and management of
intellectual property
4. Ethical Issues
5. Consideration of gender aspects
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
147. 1. S&T quality, relevant to
the topics addressed by
the call
• 1.1 Concept and objectives
– What are the main ideas that led you to propose this work? What is its
overall aim
– Describe in detail the S&T objectives. Show how they relate to the
topics addressed by the call; and state in a measurable and verifiable
form (incl. milestones).
• 1.2 Progress beyond the state-of-the-art
– Describe the state-of-the-art in the area concerned,
– Show the advance that the proposed project would bring about.
– If applicable, refer to the results of any patent search you might have
carried out.
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
148. 1. S&T quality, relevant
to the topics addressed by the
call
• 1.3 S/T methodology and associated work plan
A detailed work plan broken down into WP which should follow the
logical phases of the implementation of the project, and include
consortium management and assessment of progress and results.
Any significant risks should be identified, and contingency plans
described.
i) Describe the overall strategy of the work plan.
ii) Show the timing of the different WPs and their components (Gantt chart
or similar).
iii) Provide a detailed work description broken down into work packages:
– Work package list (table 1.3a)
– Deliverables list (table 1.3b);
– Description of each work package, and summary (table 1.3c)
– Summary effort table (table 1.3d)
– List of milestones (table 1.3e)
iv) Provide a graphical presentation of the components showing their
interdependencies (Pert diagram or similar)
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
149. Table 1.3 a: Work
package list
• LIMIT THE NUMBER OF WP!
• Show coherence in the division of work
• Ensure unity within WP
• More than 1 partner per WP (collaboration!) & multidisciplinarity
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
150. Table 1.3 b:
Deliverables list
• Deliverables are the document you produce to show that the work
has been done
• Link your deliverables with your milestones and WP
• Usually: one deliverable per task
• Mean of control for the EC
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
151. Table 1.3 c: WP
description
• Max. 3 pages per WP
• Divide the WP into tasks
• Link between WP, tasks, milestones and deliverables
• Show the role of each partner
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
152. 1.3d Summary of
staff effort
• Should be coherent with the other tables, as well as part 2.4
• Do it at the end!
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
153. 1.3e List of
milestones
• Milestones are control points in the timescale where decisions
are needed with regard to the next stage of the project
• they are not deliverables but can be associated with them
• Examples:
– major result has been achieved, if its successful attainment is
required for the next phase of work.
– when the consortium must decide which of several technologies to
adopt for further development
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
154. Conclusions for part
1
• Pages limit:
– 20 pages, plus the tables
• Evaluation criteria:
– Threshold: 3.
– Double weight
– “Scientific and/or technological excellence (relevant to the topics
addressed by the call)”
• Soundness of concept, and quality of objectives
• Progress beyond the state-of-the-art
• Quality and effectiveness of the S/T methodology and associated
work plan
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
155. 2. Implementation
(1/3)
• 2.1 Management structure and procedures
– organisational structure & decision-making mechanisms
– should match the complexity and scale of the project.
• 2.2 Individual participants
Example:
– Background and facilities
– Human resources : key personnel (whether identified yet or not)
that will work on the project
– Relevant collaboration: either with the other partners or with any
other institution, including the other EU related projects . Role in
societies/foundations/associations linked to the project.
– Tasks in the project: main competences (scientific and
demonstration), methods/techniques you will provide. role in the
WP
– Outputs of this project: If possible, to what extent this project fits in
with your long term scientific agenda, strategy, and how it is key for
your institution
– Publications relevant to the project. (max. 5)
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
156. 2. Implementation
(2/3)
• 2.3 Consortium as a whole
– How the participants collectively constitute a consortium capable of
achieving the project objectives, and how they are suited and are
committed to the tasks assigned to them.
– Show complementarities between participants as well as balance in
the consortium
– Show that the consortium is sufficient to reach the aims of the
project.
– If appropriate describe the industrial/commercial involvement to
ensure exploitation of the results, and how the opportunity of
involving SMEs has been addressed.
i) Sub-contracting
ii) Other countries (other then MS, AC, ICPC)
iii) Additional partners (not yet identified)
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
157. 2. Implementation
(3/3)
• 2.4 Resources to be committed
– In addition with part A3
– Justify the main major costs (HR, equipments, ect.)
– Explain complementary resources to cover the non-funded parts of
the project. It should thus also include costs that are not funded by
the EC.
– Overall financial plan for the project.
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
158. Conclusions for part
2
• Pages limit:
– section 2.1 - five pages
– section 2.2 - one page per participant
– section 2.3 - four pages
– section 2.4 – two pages
• Evaluation criteria:
– Threshold: 3
– “Quality & efficiency of implementation & of management”
• Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures
• Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants
• Quality of the consortium as a whole (including
complementarity, balance)
• Appropriateness of the allocation and justification of the
resources to be committed (budget, staff, equipment)
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
159. 3. Impact
• 3.1 Expected impacts listed in the work programme
– Refer and show how the project fits:
• With the WP overall objective (pp. 5 sq.)
• With the expected impacts listed in the work programme.
• Mention the steps that will be needed to bring about these impacts.
– Explain why this contribution requires a European (rather than a
national or local) approach.
– Show links with other national or international research activities in
this field.
– Mention any assumptions and external factors that may determine
whether the impacts will be achieved.
• 3.2 Dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and
management of intellectual property
– Measures for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project
results,
– Management of knowledge, of intellectual property.
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
160. Conclusions for part
3
• Pages limit:
– 10 pages
• Evaluation criteria:
– Threshold: 3
– “Potential impact through the development, dissemination
and use of project results”
• Contribution, at the European and/or international level,
to the expected impacts listed in the work programme
under the relevant topic/activity
• Appropriateness of measures for the dissemination
and/or exploitation of project results, and management of
intellectual property.
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
161. 4. Ethical Issues (1/2)
• Preliminary considerations:
– Ethical review will be performed solely on the basis of the information
available in the proposal.
– Projects raising specific ethical issues such as research intervention on
human beings; research on human embryos and human embryonic stem
cells and non-human primates are automatically submitted for ethical
review.
– To ensure compliance with ethical principles, the Commission Services will
undertake ethics audit(s) of selected projects at its discretion.
• Issues to be clarified:
– Informed consent: When describing issues relating to informed consent, it
will be necessary to illustrate an appropriate level of ethical sensitivity, and
consider issues of insurance, incidental findings and the consequences of
withdrawing from the study.
– Data protection issues: Avoid the unnecessary collection and use of
personal data. Identify the source of the data, describing whether it is
collected as part of the research or is previously collected data being used.
Consider issues of informed consent for any data being used. Describe how
personal identification in the data is protected.
– Use of animals: Where animals are used in research the application of the
3Rs (Replace, Reduce, Refine) must be convincingly addressed. Numbers
of animals should be specified. Describe what happens to the animals after
the research experiments.
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
162. 4. Ethical Issues (2/2)
– Human embryonic stem cells: Research proposals that will
involve human embryonic stem cells (hESC) will have to address all
the following specific points:
• the necessity to use hESC in order to achieve the scientific objectives
set forth in the proposal.
• whether the applicants have taken into account the legislation,
regulations, ethical rules and/or codes of conduct in place in the
country(ies) where the research using hESC is to take place, including
the procedures for obtaining informed consent;
• the source of the hESC
• the measures taken to protect personal data, including genetic data,
and privacy;
• the nature of financial inducements, if any.
– Identify the countries where research will be undertaken and
which ethical committees and regulatory organisations will
need to be approached during the life of the project.
– Include the Ethical issues table. If you indicate YES to any issue,
please identify the pages in the proposal where this ethical issue is
described.
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
164. Conclusions for part
4
• Pages limit:
– No limit. Thus be exhaustive!
– In annex agreement, consent forms,etc. can be added
• Evaluation criteria:
– None
• Eligibility criteria
– A project can be refused if this part doesn’t:
• State the ethical issues that may arise in their proposal.
• Explain the benefit and burden of their experiments and the
effects they may have on the research subject.
• Include the ethics table
• Appear to be sufficient and/or realistic
– A special Ethics peer-review is organised for all the FP7
projects
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
165. 5. Gender issues
• Content:
– Describe actions that would be undertaken during the course of the
project to promote gender equality in your project, or in your field of
research.
– Examples:
• actions related to the project consortium: e.g. improving the gender
balance in the project consortium, measures to help reconcile work and
private life, awareness raising within the consortium)
• actions aimed at a wider public: e.g. events organised in schools or
universities
• Conclusions on Part 5:
– Pages limit:
• One page
– Evaluation criteria:
• None
• This part will be discussed during negotiations if the project is
successful
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
168. FP7 Energy
Preparation, Submission and Evaluation
of the Proposals
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
SRTD is an EU
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
funded programme
183. Gateway to information:
http://cordis.europa.eu/en/home.html
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
184. Energy Drivers
Energy Technology
Platforms and Joint
Technology Initiative
Milan Jezic von Gesseneck
Brussels, Belgium
+32.478.445890
von.gesseneck@chamber.be
Amman, 1-5 August 2010
SRTD is an EU
funded programme
185. Key EU Challenges
Global energy demand predicted to increase by 60% over the next 30
years
Finite nature of conventional oil and natural gas reserves
EU energy dependency could rise from 50% to 70% by 2030; volatility of
oil prices and geopolitical instability
Over 90% of EU CO2 emissions causing climate change are attributable
to energy
Global energy investments of €12 trillion required up to 2030 – huge
market potential, but EU under severe threat from global competitors
187. EU Energy objectives and
priorities
Diversified energy mix
Energy efficiency & conservation
Low carbon
Less dependence on imported fuels
TO ADDRESS:
Security of supply
Sustainable development
Social benefit
Global climate change and environmental
degradation
Competitiveness
188.
189. Strategic Energy Technology (SET)
Plan: key milestones
10 Jan. 2007: Commission outlines SET Plan proposal as part of its
energy and climate-change package.
22 Nov. 2007: Commission tables detailed proposal
28 Feb. 2008: EU Energy Ministers endorse SET Plan.
14 March 2008: Spring Summit endorsed SET Plan and outlined
financing options.
Nov. 2008: Commission to make proposals on financing issue.
2009: European Energy Technology Summit to agree financial plan.
Source: Euractiv
190. SET Plan Principles
• Europe must pursue advances in a broad portfolio of energy
technology fields
• allow Member States to choose freely the optimal
combination of energy technologies and R&D priorities, in
line with their prerogative to decide their own energy mix.
• All sectors involved in energy-producing, energy-saving and
energy-using products and services must be guided and
stimulated towards the use of cleaner and more efficient
energy technologies.
• The full engagement of the private sector is essential.
• A stable and predictable policy framework which gives clear
signals, regulatory certainty and transparency and concrete
commitments, is a prerequisite.
• For each type of energy technology, the policy framework
should address, where needed, the entire supply chain from
basic research to full-scale market penetration.
191. SET Plan objectives
• to set up the priority Industrial Initiatives
• to further increase efforts on energy efficiency by
supporting and stimulating RDD&D on end-use
technologies
• To set up a high level steering group
• To increase EU and national funding for RDD&D
• To improve and enlarge the Community's world-class
knowledge base of energy researchers and research
institutes
• To develop, where appropriate, covenants between
government, industry and researchers for different types
of energy-producing and energy-saving technologies,
• To introduce appropriate policies and measures
• To increase international cooperation
Source: www.eu2008.si/en/News_and_Documents/Council_Conclusions/February/0228_TTE1.pdf
192. SET Plan Technology Map
• Power and Heat
• Wind power generation
• Solar photovoltaic power generation, Concentrated solar power generation,
Solar heating and cooling
• Hydropower generation
• Geothermal
• Ocean wave power generation
• Cogeneration of heat and power
• Zero emission fossil fuel power generation
• Nuclear fission power generation and Nuclear fusion
• Energy Infrastructures
• Electricity networks (Smart Grids)
• Transport
• Biofuels
• Hydrogen and fuel cells
Other technologies, such as electrical and hybrid vehicles, energy storage, etc. will
be addressed in the next update of the technology Map.
193. Energy Technology Platforms
and Joint Technology Initiative
JTI: Hydrogen and fuel cells
ETPs:
Photovoltaics
Biofuels
SmartGrids
Zero-emission fossil fuel plants
Solar Thermal
Wind
195. FP7
FP7 at a Glance
EU’s main funding tool for supporting research and
technological development
2007-
Period: 2007-2013
Total budget of over € 50 Billion
Supports research in selected priority areas
An important element in realising the Lisbon Agenda for
growth and competitiveness
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 2
196. FP7
FP7 Structure
1. Cooperation – Collaborative research
2. Ideas – Frontier Research
3. People – Marie Curie Actions
4. Capacities – Research Capacity
+
JRC non-nuclear research
Euratom direct actions – JRC nuclear research
Euratom indirect actions – nuclear fusion and fission research
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 3
197. Budget (millions of Euros)
Capacities, JRC (EC),
4 097 1 751
People, 4 750
Ideas, 7 510
Cooperation,
32 413
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 4
198. 1. Cooperation programme
priority- top-
European priority-driven and top-down research, implemented
through 10 thematic areas
Feature:
International Cooperation integrated at thematic level
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 5
199. Collaborative Research Projects
Support to research projects carried out by consortia with participants
from different countries, aiming at developing new knowledge, new
technology, products or common resources for research
The size, scope and internal organisation of projects can vary from
field to field and from topic to topic.
medium-
Projects can range from small or medium-scale focused research
actions to larger integrating projects which mobilise a significant
volume of resources for achieving a defined objective.
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 6
200. Cooperation – Collaborative
Research
Ten themes
Budget (M €)
( )
1. Health……………......................................................... 6 100
2. Food, agriculture and fisheries, and biotechnology.. 1 935
3. Information and communication technologies……… 9 050
4. Nanosciences, nanotechnologies, materials
technologies……………………..3
and new production technologies……………………..3 475
5. Energy……………………………………………………… 2 350
6. Environment (including climate change)……………. 1 890
7. Transport (including aeronautics)……………………. 4 160
Socio-
8. Socio-economic sciences and the humanities……... 623
9. Space ……………………………………………………… 1 430
10. Security…………………………………………………...... 1 400
TOTAL 32 413
Euratom for nuclear research and training activities. 2 751
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 7
201. Cooperation – collaborative research
Work programmes implemented on annual basis by:
Call for proposals
Commission-specified topics
Commission-
Commission-
Commission-specified project types
two-
Evaluation procedure could differ (one or two-step)
Could also specify estimated budget, size and composition
of consortium (types and locations of partners)
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 8
202. International Cooperation in the
Specific Programme ‘Cooperation’ (i)
All themes open to third countries
Minimum 3 different EU Member State (MS) or Associated countries
(AC)
Beyond this minimum, all 3rd countries can participate
International Cooperation Partner Countries (ICPC) would generally
be funded
Industrialised countries funded only if indispensable for the project
Targeted calls possible
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 9
203. International Cooperation in the
Specific Programme ‘Cooperation’ (ii)
In addition: Specific International Cooperation
Actions linked to the 10 themes
Calls for proposals dedicated to ICPC in each Theme (see
relevant work programme)
Minimum 4 participants from different countries: 2 ICPC
+ 2 MS or AC
ICPC participants would always be funded
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 10
204. FP7
Funding schemes of FP7
(large-
Collaborative Research Project (large-scale integrating
projects)
medium-
Collaborative Research Project (small or medium-scale
focused project)
Network of Excellence (NoE)
Coordination and Support Action
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 11
205. 2. Ideas programme
Activities and Principles
Support for individual teams
Host organisation to be located in the European Union (or
Associated State)
All fields of science and scholarship are eligible
Investigator- bottom-
Investigator-driven, bottom-up
Excellence is the only criterion
Principal investigator/team + research project
Investment in research talent
Flexible grants, under the control of the Principal Investigator
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 12
206. 3. Capacities Programme (i)
Objectives
Enhance research and innovation capacities in Europe
Research infrastructures, SMEs
research-
Promote the development of regional research-driven clusters
Unlock and develop the research potential in the EU’s ‘convergence
regions’ and outermost regions
In essence: the Capacities Programme will not promote actual
collaborative research activities but will complement the Cooperation
Programme
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 13
207. Capacities : Areas and budget (ii)
Research Infrastructures 1 715 M€
Research for the benefit of SMEs 1 336 M€
Regions of Knowledge 126 M€
Research Potential for Convergence Regions 340 M€
Science in Society 330 M€
Coherent development of research policies 70 M€
Activities of International Cooperation 180 M€
Total 4097 M€
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 14
208. 4. People Programme
Overall scope
Human resource development in R&D in Europe
Numerous, well-trained, motivated researchers
well-
Attract students to research careers
Attract researchers to Europe
Skills and sustainable career development
Continuity of previous Framework programme, Appropriate gender
balance
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 15
209. People Programme – Marie Curie Actions
. Initial training of researchers
Marie Curie Networks
Life-long training and career development
Individual Fellowships
Co-financing of regional / national / international programmes
Industry-academia pathways and partnerships
Industry-Academia Knowledge-sharing Scheme
International dimension
Outgoing & Incoming* International Fellowships; International Cooperation
Scheme; Reintegration grants; Support to researcher ‘diasporas’
Specific actions
Mobility and career enhancement actions; Excellence awards
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 16
210. Procedure
Work Programme: Implementation of the Specific Programme,
Priorities, Objectives, Policies.
Call for Proposal: Specific programme, Topics, Projects,
Funding Schemes, Budget, Deadline.
Preparation: Idea, Partner search, Consortium formation,
Proposal writing
Submission: EPSS, Deadline.
Evaluation: Eligible, Success, Reject.
Contract
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 17
211. Further information
FP7
For more information on the key programmes of FP7
see the homepage of the CORDIS information site for
FP7
FP7 at:
http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7
http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 18
212. National Contact Point (NCP)
National structure implemented in:
Member States
Associated States
Third Countries
Main provider of advice and individual assistance
FP7
concerning the participation in FP7 activities
FP7
Appointed for each of the areas of FP7
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 19
213. Information Point or MED-NCP
MED-
Structures similar to the NCP created in some
Mediterranean countries
Established by the European projects: EuroMEDANet
EuroMEDANet-
and EuroMEDANet-2 in order to:
Provide information on the opportunities and modalities
for participation in the Sixth and Seventh Framework
FP6 FP7
Programmes FP6 & FP7
Assists potential participants and contractors on ongoing
projects
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 20
214. How can InP assist you?
Identifying a suitable call for proposal:
Searching for a partner:
Choosing the appropriate instrument.
Writing a proposal.
Submitting the proposal (Electronic (EPSS) or paper form)
If the project is accepted :
Assisting on signing the contract
Following up the execution of the project
Assisting in case of problems or difficulties
If the project is refused :
Analysing the evaluation report to make better proposals in the
future
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 21
215. Thank you for your kind attention
Fifth TEMPUS National Information Day – 7 February 2010 22