0637 Comparison of the System of Rice Intensification with Conventional Practice in Dung Toung, Kampot Province
•Als PPT, PDF herunterladen•
3 gefällt mir•1,901 views
Presenters: Chuong Sophal and Sras Phanny
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (20)
Andere mochten auch
Andere mochten auch (20)
Ähnlich wie 0637 Comparison of the System of Rice Intensification with Conventional Practice in Dung Toung, Kampot Province
Ähnlich wie 0637 Comparison of the System of Rice Intensification with Conventional Practice in Dung Toung, Kampot Province (20)
Mehr von SRI-Rice, Dept. of Global Development, CALS, Cornell University
Mehr von SRI-Rice, Dept. of Global Development, CALS, Cornell University (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
0637 Comparison of the System of Rice Intensification with Conventional Practice in Dung Toung, Kampot Province
- 1. COMPARISON OF THE SYSTEM OF RICE INTENSIFICATION WITH CONVENTIONAL PRACTICE IN DUNG TOUNG, KAMPOT PROVINCE By : Mr. CHUONG Sophal : Mr. SRAS Phanny Supported by Cambodian Agricultural Research Fund (CARF)
- 2. Objectives To study on the conventional practices To study the system of rice intensification (SRI) Comparison the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) and Conventional Practice Economic analysis
- 3. METHODOLOGY
- 6. Data collection is divided into two steps: 1-Primary data : interview with farmers. 40 farmers were selected: -20 SRI farmers : 10 local variety used-farmers and 10 modern variety used-farmers -20 Non-SRI farmers: 10 local variety used-farmers and 10 modern variety used-farmers 2-Secondary data : collecting from libraries . Data collection
- 7. COMPARISON BETWEEN THE SYSTEM OF RICE INTENSIFICATION WITH CONVENTIONAL PRACTICES
- 11. Spacing Spacing 29.85 23.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SRI Non SRI cm
- 15. Results of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) and Conventional Practice
- 21. SRI Yields 5.1 3.921 4.00 3.405 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Riangchey N = 5 6 kour N=8 Riangchey N = 6 6 kour N = 8 NON SRI T/ha
- 22. Summary of analyzes by ANOVA ** ** ** ** 1000-seed weight ** ** ns ns Grains per panicle ** ** ns ns Yield ns ns ** ** Panicle length ** ** ** ** Tillers/hill Non-SRI 6 Kour SRI 6 Kour Non-SRI Rang Chey SRI Rang Chey
- 23. Grains per panicle 234 . 219 222 196 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Riangchey 6 kour Riangchey 6 kour SRI NON SRI grains
- 24. Weight per 1000 grains 25.8 22.8 22.4 21.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Riangchey 6 kour Riangchey 6 kour SRI NON SRI grams
- 25. Number of plants per hill 11.12 9.05 9.06 10.73 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Riangchey 6 kour Riangchey 6 kour SRI NON SRI
- 26. Panicle length 28.8 26.6 25.6 25.5 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Riangchey 6 kour Riangchey 6 kour SRI NON SRI cm
- 29. Correlation between SRI Score and Yield Yield y = 30.694x + 3098.3 R 2 = 0.1637 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Score
- 30. Economical analysis Table11: Expenditure on SRI and Conventional practice 415.050 193.997 Total 230.616 66.572 Labor (riel/ha) 25.958 45.160 Irrigation (riel/ha) 158.476 82.265 Chemical fertilizers (riel/ha) Traditional technique SRI Expenses
- 31. Table12 : Expenses, Income, Profits of SRI and Conventional practice 381.493 1.120.470 1.501.963 Profits 221.053 415.050 193.997 Expenses 160.440 1.535.520 1.695.960 Income Differences Traditional SRI Description
- 34. THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION !