This document summarizes a study comparing the wine industries of Chile, Italy, and South Africa. It finds that while traditional theories of catching up do not fully explain New World wine producers' success, they seized opportunities from changes in global demand and supply. Chile and South Africa adopted market-driven approaches with investments in science, marketing, and efficient institutions. In contrast, Italy's industry was initially inert and remains fragmented among small producers. The study uses sectoral innovation systems analysis to examine the wine industries' market opportunities, knowledge development, actor networks, and institutions over time.
Dehradun Call Girls Service ☎ ️82500–77686 ☎️ Enjoy 24/7 Escort Service
Catching up trajectories in the wine sector: Chile, Italy, South Africa
1. Catching up Trajectories in the Wine Sector:
A Comparative Study of Chile,
Italy and South Africa
Roberta Rabellotti
Semeq-Università del Piemonte Orientale - Italy
World Knowledge Forum, Seoul
13-15 October 2009
2. Some stylised facts
Ø Wine is an increasingly internationally traded good:
rapid growth of export volumes and values explained
by
Ø consumption falling in the traditional producing
countries, especially France and Italy;
Ø consumption expanding in non-producing
countries in Europe (UK, Netherlands, Sweden,…)
and Asia (Japan, and very recently Korea, China,
India);
Ø Emergence of New World producers: volume expansion
and quality upgrading;
Ø Old World producers facing serious challenges in an
incresingly competitive market.
4. The traditional theory of catching up
• Emergence of New World wine producers can be hardly
explained by conventional theories of catching up:
– Adoption and adaptation of technologies from
advanced economies;
– Relative speed along a fixed track;
– Niche strategies and market segmentation by followers;
• Windows of opportunities have been opened up by
relevant discontinuities on the demand and supply side;
• Process of technological and organizational modernisation
driven by newcomers.
5. The Sectoral Systems of Innovation
• Our analysis is based on the four constituent
dimensions of a sectoral system (Malerba,
2004; Malerba & Nelson, 2007; Malerba &
Mani, 2009):
– Market;
– Knowledge and technology;
– Key actors and networks;
– Institutions.
6. Market
Relevant discontinuities in wine consumption habits since the
late 1970s
a) Traditional wine countries
• Decline or stagnating consumption;
• Wine drinking as a “cultural experience”;
b) Emergent markets (Northern Europe, US, Australia, lately
Russia and China) – inexperienced consumers
• Increasing popularity of wine as a “beverage;”
• Preference for easy drinking and pleasant tasting varietal
wines (Sauvignon, Cabernet, etc.);
Ø Role of wine experts and magazines in changing
perception and reputation;
Quality is no longer the exclusive domain of
producers, it is increasingly the value
c) Distribution channels: perceived consolidation by the market
and large-scale retailing
easily identifiable top selling brands.
7. NW vs. OW response to market opportunity
New World:
Demand changes embraced & favoured by California and
Australia, followed by Chile, South Africa, Argentina,..,
through:
Ø Knowledge and technology:
Ø Investments in science;
Ø Access to foreign knowledge;
Ø Market-driven research to build up products
satisfying new international tastes;
Ø Market: Aggressive marketing strategies, branding,
large scale retailing;
Ø Institutions: Setting up of an efficient institutional
framework.
Old World: Initially, inertial response (strengthening the
concept of terroir and maintaining a producer-driven
approach).
8. Knowledge
Intense process of knowledge codification and formal investigation
Number of articles on wine-related fields (Web of Science – ISI)
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
9. Technology
NW: Market driven approach
- Research oriented towards responding to (and further
strengthening) the changes in demand
Ø Introduction of new grapes varieties;
Ø Reduction of the variability of output in order to obtain
wines with regular taste and quality.
- Large investments in human resources, marketing and
branding;
- Access to external sources of knowledge (external
consultants).
OW: Producer driven approach
- Strenghtening of traditional varieties;
- Process-related investments;
- In-house competences and local research networks
Ø context-specific and cumulative learning.
10. The importance of external knowledge
• Almost all the Chilean firms interviewed rely on
external consultants as agronomists or
oenologists (the flying winemakers);
• Piedmont producers rely exclusively on experts
from the same region and on internal
competences;
• Experimental activity: 85% of the Chilean and
67% of the South African firms do undertake this
activity in collaboration with some external
partners, while in Piedmont this happens only in
48% of the firms.
11. Network of research collaborations
between countries: 1992 – 1996
• Only European (France,
Germany, Italy and
Spain) and North-
American countries, with
the exception of Israel,
are involved in
international
collaborations;
• The network is fully
centred around the USA,
with which all the other
countries are connected
12. Network of research collaborations between
countries: 1997 – 2001
• The number of countries
involved increases
significantly from 7 in the
previous period to 20;
• The USA is still the
central player, being the
country with most
linkages;
• Among the new players,
there are Australia, some
Asian countries and some
other European countries,
13. Network of research collaborations between
countries: 2002 - 2006
• The network increases
its complexity with the
participation of 36
countries;
• Among the new
countries entering into
the international
research community by
the time considered
there are Argentina,
Chile and South Africa.
14. U-I networks in Chile and SA
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE TALCA
INIA LA PLATINA
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
0
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
INIA CAUQUENES
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
CIREN
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE SANTIAGO DE CHILE
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE SANTIAGO DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE TALCA
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD TÉCNICA FEDERICO SANTA MARÍA
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE
INIA LA PLATINA
UNIVERSIDAD DE CONCEPCIÓN
UNIVERSIDAD TÉCNICA FEDERICO SANTA MARÍA
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Catholic
University
University
of Chile
Figure 6 University-Industry network in Chile
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
0
0
0
UNIVERSITY ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ OF STELLENBOSCH
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA
ARC PLANT PROTECION RESEARCH INSTITUTE
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ARC
University of
Stellenbosch
Figure 7 University-Industry network in South Africa
15. Main Actors
• Remarkable process of
consolidation across the
NW, vertical integration,
foreign capital
participation;
• Italy is dominated by very
small wineries;
• The sum of the total sales
of the top 5 Italian wine
producers is only €1 bln,
much less than world
leaders as Constellation
Brands which almost
reached €4 bln.
Rank Company Headquarter Volume of sales
(mln 9-lt cases)
World share (%)
1 Constellations
Brands
USA 104.0 3.9
2 E&J Gallo
Winery
USA 72.0 2.7
3 The Wine Group USA 41.9 1.6
4 Foster’s Wine
Estate
AUSTRALIA 39.7 1.5
5 Pernod Ricard FRANCE 37.5 1.4
6 Castel Freres FRANCE 36.0 1.4
7 Bacardi BERMUDA 25.7 1.0
8 Le Grand Chais
de France
France 22.0 0.8
9 Vina Concha y
Toro
CHILE 21.4 0.8
10 Distell Group SOUTH
AFRICA
20.5 0.8
16. Institutions
• Following the early successful Australian
experience, a top-down planning
approach has been followed by South
Africa and more recently by Chile;
• Industry-level umbrella institutions (one
single organisation with different branches)
are created with the aim of co-ordinating
export oriented priorities and targets,
promoting and socialising a vision for the
industry at large;
• Italy: fragmentation and redundancy.
17. Concluding remarks and some recent
trends
• The wine industry represents an extremely interesting
case in point of technological renovation driven by
emerging countries that, following different trajectories,
have been moving the competitive game on new
playgrounds;
• Incumbents’ response: inertia and then awareness of the
new playground;
• Recently, the Old World has begun to respond through
strategies of diversification and experimentation for
upgrading. These strategies address the demand side
evolutions, mainly the diffusion of a gourmet culture, in
which wine drinking is perceived as contributing to a
richer cultural experience, and variety and specificity are
positive attributes;
• In this perspective, highly centralized R&D policies, such
as those implemented by New World countries, may
become increasingly inappropriate to tackle the
emerging pattern of diversified demand?
.
18. Forthcoming in 2010
Innovation and Technological Catch-Up:
The Changing Geography
of Wine Production
Elisa Giuliani, Andrea Morrison &
Roberta Rabellotti (Eds.)
Edward Elgar