Session 1: FRONTIERS: why research on research matters
Where do we see the greatest progress and possibilities of RoR?
Panorama: Chonnettia Jones, Director of Insight and Analysis, Wellcome
Snapshots: James Wilsdon, Professor of Research Policy, University of Sheffield
Sarah de Rijcke, Director, CWTS, Leiden University
Daniel Hook, CEO, Digital Science
6. “Global spending on R&D has reached a record
high of almost US $1.7 trillion. About 10 countries
account for 80% of spending. As part of the
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), countries
have pledged to substantially increase public and
private R&D spending as well as the number of
researchers by 2030.”
- UNESCO.org
7. 7
Our origins
Founder Sir Henry Wellcome was
an entrepreneur, collector and
philanthropist.
On his death in 1936, his will
established a charity for "the
advancement of medical and
scientific research to improve
mankind's wellbeing".
9. We hold ourselves accountable to
society for delivering Wellcome’s
mission, while using our
independence for public benefit.
10. Why ‘research on research’
Wellcome wants to distribute its funding in the most efficient, fair,
effective, and beneficial ways possible to achieve our mission of
improving health for everyone.
To that end, we wish to encourage research that helps us to better
understand our own funding practices and policies - and those of other
funders - and how they can be improved to enable research and
innovation.
11. What we learned
Evidence tends to be narrow, fragmented, rarely generalisable and not
actionable by funders.
There is little funding for meta-research studies that could usefully
inform funding policy and practice.
Funders need to participate as collaborators and end-users of research
through the co-design, co-development and co-production of research.
There should be a clearly defined set of research questions where
funding data, policies and practices can be shared.
12. “The relentless drive for research
excellence has created a culture..that
cares exclusively about what is
achieved, and not about how it is
achieved.”
- Sir Jeremy Farrar, Wellcome
Help us #ReimagineResearch
13. African Academy of Sciences
Austrian Science Fund
Consortium of Canadian funders including British Columbia’s
Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research and
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Dutch Research Council
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Novo Nordisk Foundation
Albert P. Sloan Foundation
Swiss National Science Foundation
Volkswagen Foundation
Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance
Wellcome Trust
22. ‘In the regime of the inter-, certain visions of
territory - along with the corollary concepts of
borders, incursions, and empire-building -
loom large.’
(Fitzgerald & Callard 2015: 16)
23. Transformative RoR at CWTS
Fueling public debate
on valuing research
Provider of research
intelligence
Research evaluation, -
management, - policy
Tool development
& reflexive analysis
24. Set ourselves against the ‘regime of the inter-’
And start -->
(Fitzgerald & Callard 2015: 16)
34. RoRI's five aims
To support and build capacity for interdisciplinary, mixed-method and translational RoR in and
across research systems worldwide (research role);
To connect academic RoR capabilities to the data and analytical resources of our founding and
strategic partners (translation role);
With these partners, to experiment, coproduce and test new tools, indicators, funding modes,
decision and evaluation frameworks (innovation role);
To critically evaluate RoR methods and support engagement with RoR data and evidence by
decision makers and wider society (brokerage role);
To create an independent space for RoR learning, networking and collaboration between
researchers, policymakers, funders & technologists (facilitator role).
Extend welcome on behalf of:
Wellcome Trust
University of Sheffield
CWTS, University of Leiden
Digital Science
[Add Slido info]
Fire alarm – Not expecting a drill. In the case of alarm, evacuate through the nearest exit.
Utilities – Location of nearest toilets
Smartphones – Place phones on vibrate
Sessions format
Exciting but busy program.
Each Chair will keep strict timing.
Session2-4 will kick off with a longer panorama talk, followed by short snapshot talks.
Then the session discussant will respond with some reflections.
Following the discussant’s comments, we will invite comments and questions from the audience
Hold questions until the Q&A > Line up behind 1 of 2 standing microphones.
Roving microphones for those who are unable to access the microphones.
Please keep comments/questions brief to allow others opportunity.
Anonymous submission of questions via Slido using #RoRILaunch
Introduce panel:
Myself
Sarah de Rijcke, CWTS, Leiden university
Daniel Hook, Digital Science
James Wilsdon, University of Sheffield
An estimated $2 trillion dollars is spent on research and development around the world.
Considering this sizeable investment in research,
There is little understanding of what works, for whom, and under which circumstances.
On Sir Henry Wellcome’s death,
His will established a charitable foundation
For "the advancement of medical and scientific research to improve mankind's wellbeing.“
Today, we are stewards of an endowment valued at more than £23 billion, which funds all of our charitable activities.
Wellcome’s mission is inspired by Henry’s will: to improve health for everyone by helping great ideas to thrive.
Core to achieving our mission is science, research, innovation and engagement with society.
Over the past 18 months, we have asked ourselves – to whom are we accountable?
Our legal accountability is clear
But what does it mean to be a charitable foundation?
An in whose interests should we be trying to act?
How do we make the best use of our independence as a foundation in service to society?
We’ve determined that our true accountability is to our ultimate beneficiaries,
Which are the people whose health is improved by our work.
So, we should have their best interests in mind whenever we make decisions and
And, they are right to ask what are we doing, and why.
For the last 2 years, we’ve gone in search of research evidence that can inform our policies and practice, and spoke with more than 25 other international funders to find out what we can learn from others.
However, we found that:
Existing research evidence is fragmented, not generalizable, nor actionable by funders.
Yet, there is little funding for meta-research that could usefully inform funding practice.
But before we embark investing in more research, we need to optimise the potential of the research produced to be taken up into policy and practice:
1) Funders should co-design, co-develop, co-produce studies that could impact on funding policies or practices.
In the same way that clinicians, patients or publics are brought in at the start of the study to increase the potential relevance of the outputs to be translated into beneficial outcomes.
2) There should be a defined set of questions where funders’ data, policies and practices can be shared.
Insights can then be generalised so funders can adopt and translate as relevant for their operating context.
The time to act is now:
Mounting pressures on research funding.
Urgent existential threats facing the health and wellbeing of humans and the planet.
Including drug-resistant infections, mental illness and climate change.
Research is needed to accelerate our understanding of science and health and find solutions to complex societal challenges.
Advances in data and technology offer more sophisticated and innovative tools for obtaining real-time intelligence on research systems.
However, putting progress at risk, is the relentless drive for research excellence
With the focus being on what,
And not enough on how.
We are delighted to announce that other research funders around the world
share our ambition to reimagine our collective approach
to how we can contribute, support and encourage
more strategic, open, diverse and inclusive research for everyone.
Over the coming months, we look forward to expanding the consortium - to include additional funders, publishers, and learned and professional societies as partners – that share our vision.
The institutions that underpin research are changing…
Research communication: Papers and Monographs can no longer contain the research results of today…
…It is no longer possible to Peer review work the way that we once did…
…systems of credit are failing to acknowledge the diversification of roles in research…
We need technologies to help not just researchers but the whole ecosystem…
…but we need to be careful…the slowness of research is important…system 2 thinking – rational considered brainsnot overly rapid to make decisions…systems of trust are critical
The institutions that underpin research are changing…
Research communication: Papers and Monographs can no longer contain the research results of today…
…It is no longer possible to Peer review work the way that we once did…
…systems of credit are failing to acknowledge the diversification of roles in research…
We need technologies to help not just researchers but the whole ecosystem…
…but we need to be careful…the slowness of research is important…system 2 thinking – rational considered brainsnot overly rapid to make decisions…systems of trust are critical
The institutions that underpin research are changing…
Research communication: Papers and Monographs can no longer contain the research results of today…
…It is no longer possible to Peer review work the way that we once did…
…systems of credit are failing to acknowledge the diversification of roles in research…
We need technologies to help not just researchers but the whole ecosystem…
…but we need to be careful…the slowness of research is important…system 2 thinking – rational considered brainsnot overly rapid to make decisions…systems of trust are critical