Rolling on the bed - an objective assessment of three devices
•Als PPTX, PDF herunterladen•
0 gefällt mir•779 views
In this presentation we explored rolling on the bed and objectively assessed three solution to ask how they compared in terms of return on investment.
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Empfohlen
Empfohlen (20)
Rolling on the bed - an objective assessment of three devices
- 1. ROLLING ON THE BED Objective Assessment of 3 devices Emma Small and Aideen Gallagher
- 4. GIMMICK
- 5. GEM
- 6. THE TASK Rolling a 100kg person in bed to fit a hoist sling
- 7. Equipment Evaluation Competence Objective Assessment Comparison Creativity Gallagher, A. (2017)
- 8. COMPETENCE
- 9. OBJECTIVE AX
- 13. OUR RESULTS Slide sheet In situ slide sheet Mechanical slide sheet Time for transfer 3 minutes 3 minutes 2 minutes No of care workers 2 1 1 Deviations from neutral 9 7 4 Number of steps 16 14 9 Cost of item $50 $360 $10,000 If task completed 10 times per day 30 mins 30 mins 20 mins CW cost (NDIS) $40 $20 $14 Time for item to pay for self 18 days ($360/$20 saved per day) 384 days ($10,000/$26 saved per day)
- 14. What other problems can we solve with this device? CREATIVITY
- 15. Equipment Evaluation Competence Objective Assessment Comparison Creativity Gallagher, A. (2017)
- 16. THANK YOU emmasmall@riskmanaged.com.au aideengallagher@riskmanaged.com.au Lets aim for #injuryfreequalitycare
- 17. CONNECTING WITH US Our Amazon #1 Best Selling Book THE MANUAL HANDLING REVOLUTION: How health professionals can achieve creative solutions for people with disabilities and their care givers FREE SAMPLE AT: www.riskmanged.com.au
- 18. CONNECTING WITH US HANDLE WITH CARE EMMA SMALL How disability organisations can avoid injuries, increase surplus and become a provider of choice Due for publication late 2018
- 19. CONNECTING WITH US STANDING HOIST STUDY WEBINAR FREE ON OUR WEBSITE http://riskmanaged.com.au/standing- hoist-study/
- 20. REFERENCES • Chhokar, R., Engst, C., Miller, A., Robinson, D., Tate, R.B., Yassi, A., (2005). The three year economic benefits of a ceiling lift intervention aimed to reduce healthcare worker injuries. Applied Ergonomics. 36, 223e229. • Gallagher, A. (2017). The Manual handling Revolution. How health professionals care achieve creative solutions for people with disabilities and their care givers. Michael Hanrahan Publishing, Melbourne
- 21. MEDIA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • Icons (competence, objective assessment, comparison and creativity) – Copyright Risk Managed • Care giver and Client – Istock owned by Risk Managed • Occupational Therapist by Isle of Man Governmenthttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ • Gem – purchase by Risk Managed from icon finder
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Hello my name is Aideen Gallagher and this is my colleague Emma Small. Today we are going to implement the model of equipment evaluation I talk about in my book, The Manual Handling Revolution. The task we are going to apply it to is rolling on the bed This is a workshop based presentation so you will be doing in a few minutes. Before we start doing I am going to explain why I think a model like this is a needed and how you might work your way through a model such as this.
- We all know that manual handling is a problem in the health and social care area with figures such as 50 health workers everyday get an injury at work here in Australia.
- As health professionals, we are the ones that our team look to to be able to solve manual handling problems and a large component of that is the use of equipment. From our work with health professionals over the last ten years we have found that health professionals lack the knowledge of equipment to the extent they should have. In the 1980s, a gap existed between manual handling requirements and equipment options available, because there was no real innovation in the industry. Carers of people with disabilities had to do a significant amount of lifting to care for these people. As light was shed on the risk to carers from manual handling, especially the risk of back injury, industry experts put a call out for equipment innovators to develop solutions. By the start of the 21st century, these solutions were being provided by forward-thinking equipment companies. Innovators came to the industry, creating some really clever options to minimise manual handling. While they answered the call in terms of options available, we now have the opposite problem. We have too many options available to us.
- Equipment that is not cutting the mustard. It is crap, it creates further problems
- Gold the icing the cake, the yeah I love this
- We want to avoid the like/I don’t like equipment. We want to know why? number of steps in the process cost of installed items (including maintenance costs) level of deviation from neutral position of body/ergonomic risk experience and comfort (for client and care worker) time taken to complete the procedure number of care workers required cost of the procedure time for the item to pay for itself.
- Learning Environment Learning agreement This is not about perfection of technique – learning about equipment Task directions 3 stations: One with a regular slide sheet In situ slide sheet Mechanical slide sheet. The start of the task – person is lying in bed in the morning End of the task – sling is under the person in lying on the bed Station 1 Bed Two slide sheets Sling Station 2 Wendy lett Bed Sling Station 3 Vendt let Bed Sling Time at each station is 15 minutes Timed Do the task of fitting the hoist sling Take the measures Deviation from neutral spine Time to do the activity Number of care workers $41.36 cost of a care worker under the NDIS Multiply time x $41.36