The document summarizes the findings of a longitudinal survey on capital budgeting practices conducted between 1975 and 1992 with 100 large UK firms. The key findings are:
1. Discounted cash flow methods like IRR and NPV have become well established, growing from around 30-40% usage in 1975 to over 70% in 1992. NPV saw the largest growth over the period.
2. Combining multiple evaluation techniques has become more common, with over a third of firms now using all four main techniques (payback, IRR, NPV, AARR) compared to just 11% in 1980.
3. Post-decision controls like cost overrun monitoring and post-completion audits have significantly
1- Introduce your environmental issue and your purpose of analysis.docxmonicafrancis71118
1- Introduce your environmental issue and your purpose of analysis of the impacts the issue has created and what is being done to help this issue (solutions).
2- Develop a background paragraph of the issue - the history of its development, its current situation, and its size and scope.
3- Develop a paragraph for each impact this environmental issue has on the world, explaining the impact and providing evidence of this impact from sources. (3 parghs)
4- Develop an analysis paragraph for each solution that is being used or developed – explaining the solution clearly, and discussing how this will impact the problem, discussing the impact and limitations of the solution.
5- Develop a clear conclusion summarizing your analysis process and insights gleaned from your analysis.
Reporting on long-term value creation by Canadian companies: A
longitudinal assessment
Petra F.A. Dilling a, *, Peter Harris b
a School of Management, New York Institute of Technology, 701 W Georgia St., Vancouver, BC V7Y 1K8, Canada
b School of Management, New York Institute of Technology, 26West 61st Street, New York, NY, NY 10023, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 30 August 2017
Received in revised form
21 January 2018
Accepted 27 March 2018
Available online 27 April 2018
Keywords:
Long-term value creation
Integrated reporting
Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
Canadian extractive sector
Sustainability
Stakeholders
a b s t r a c t
In the wake of the global financial crisis, a new wave of stakeholder demands has developed calling on
companies to shift focus towards long-term value creation and moving away from a short-term earnings
emphasis. Aligned with these demands, urgent calls for more transparency and improved reporting on
both financial as well as non-financial reports have been made. The objective of this study was to analyze
longitudinal disclosure quality and quantity trends in reporting on long-term value creation of 19
publicly traded Canadian energy and mining companies. Content analysis was conducted in order to
assess disclosure on long-term value creation in annual financial and sustainability reports. The empirical
results show that the companies experienced a substantial increase in the reporting disclosure quality
and quantity. This was true for both disclosure in the annual financial reports as well as in the sus-
tainability reports. These results supported the hypotheses that Canadian public energy and mining
companies had increased their quantity and quality of long-term value creation disclosure in 2014 as
compared to 2012. Even though increases in disclosure quality could be observed (especially in the areas
of governance, responsible work practices, outside relationships and risk management), overall disclo-
sure quality (especially in areas such as connectivity between financials and sustainability sections,
materiality analysis, projects with high climate risk exposure, cost of energy, responsible work practices,
ince.
1- Introduce your environmental issue and your purpose of analysis.docxmonicafrancis71118
1- Introduce your environmental issue and your purpose of analysis of the impacts the issue has created and what is being done to help this issue (solutions).
2- Develop a background paragraph of the issue - the history of its development, its current situation, and its size and scope.
3- Develop a paragraph for each impact this environmental issue has on the world, explaining the impact and providing evidence of this impact from sources. (3 parghs)
4- Develop an analysis paragraph for each solution that is being used or developed – explaining the solution clearly, and discussing how this will impact the problem, discussing the impact and limitations of the solution.
5- Develop a clear conclusion summarizing your analysis process and insights gleaned from your analysis.
Reporting on long-term value creation by Canadian companies: A
longitudinal assessment
Petra F.A. Dilling a, *, Peter Harris b
a School of Management, New York Institute of Technology, 701 W Georgia St., Vancouver, BC V7Y 1K8, Canada
b School of Management, New York Institute of Technology, 26West 61st Street, New York, NY, NY 10023, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 30 August 2017
Received in revised form
21 January 2018
Accepted 27 March 2018
Available online 27 April 2018
Keywords:
Long-term value creation
Integrated reporting
Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
Canadian extractive sector
Sustainability
Stakeholders
a b s t r a c t
In the wake of the global financial crisis, a new wave of stakeholder demands has developed calling on
companies to shift focus towards long-term value creation and moving away from a short-term earnings
emphasis. Aligned with these demands, urgent calls for more transparency and improved reporting on
both financial as well as non-financial reports have been made. The objective of this study was to analyze
longitudinal disclosure quality and quantity trends in reporting on long-term value creation of 19
publicly traded Canadian energy and mining companies. Content analysis was conducted in order to
assess disclosure on long-term value creation in annual financial and sustainability reports. The empirical
results show that the companies experienced a substantial increase in the reporting disclosure quality
and quantity. This was true for both disclosure in the annual financial reports as well as in the sus-
tainability reports. These results supported the hypotheses that Canadian public energy and mining
companies had increased their quantity and quality of long-term value creation disclosure in 2014 as
compared to 2012. Even though increases in disclosure quality could be observed (especially in the areas
of governance, responsible work practices, outside relationships and risk management), overall disclo-
sure quality (especially in areas such as connectivity between financials and sustainability sections,
materiality analysis, projects with high climate risk exposure, cost of energy, responsible work practices,
ince.
A framework for the analysis of interview data from multiple field research s...Afzaal Ali
Anne Lillis is a Professor of Management Accounting and Head Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Perfor...Sustainable Brands
This 2011 report is a must-read for sustainability executives and a valuable go-to resource for engaging senior management in the benefits of sustainability integration.
Abstract
We investigate the effect of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Using a matched sample of 180 US companies, we find that corporations that voluntarily adopted sustainability policies by 1993 -- termed as High Sustainability companies -- exhibit by 2009, distinct organizational processes compared to a matched sample of firms that adopted almost none of these policies -- termed as Low Sustainability companies. We find that the boards of directors of these companies are more likely to be formally responsible for sustainability and top executive compensation incentives are more likely to be a function of sustainability metrics. Moreover, High Sustainability companies are more likely to have established processes for stakeholder engagement, to be more long-term oriented, and to exhibit higher measurement and disclosure of nonfinancial information. Finally, we provide evidence that High Sustainability companies significantly outperform their counterparts over the long-term, both in terms of stock market as well as accounting performance.
DATA OUTPUT.docx
GRAPHS FOR QUESTION ONE
MONTHLY STOCK RETURNS
SCATTERPLOT PLUS REGRESSION LINE
TABLE FOR QUESTION TWO (REGRESSION OUTPUT FOR MODEL ONE)
GRAPHS FOR QUESTION THREE
TABLES AND FIGURES FOR QUESTION TWO WHICH REQUIRES USE OF DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS
1.TEST FOR NORMALITY
2.HETEROSKEDASTICTY TEST USING THE WHITE METHOD
3.TEST FOR SERIAL CORRELATION USING LM TEST
USING HAC METHOD TO CORRECT HETEROSKEDASTICITY AND SERIAL CORRELATION (FIXING THE ERRORS)
QUESTION 5-USING CHOW TEST TO TEST WHETHER THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AFFECTED THE RELATIONSHIP
QUESTION 6-REGRESSION OUTPUT FOR MODEL 2
QUESTION 7: WALD TEST FOR TESTING JOINT HYPOTHESIS
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
808284868890929496980002040608
ResidualActualFitted
0
20
40
60
80
100
808284868890929496980002040608
General Dynamics Corp S
0
4
8
12
16
20
808284868890929496980002040608
Federal Funds Rate (Effective) FED
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
808284868890929496980002040608
NRSt
PROFESSOR'S COMMENTS.docx
1. In question 2, the model requires you to use the monthly stock returns to do the regression. By contrast, it is evident that you have used nominal stock prices instead of returns. This is totally wrong. You have not even made reference to the Discounted Cash flow model
2. In question 3 you are required to plot the actual values, the fitted values (predicted values) and the residuals and comment on model fitting. I am afraid that it apparently appears that you have not done so
3. You have not answered question four
4. You have not answered question five
5. Where is the answers for questions 6 and 7. To be precise the test for joint hypothesis required in question 7 is not shown and the outcome and the conclusions there in.
ECONOMETRICS ASSIGNMENT.pdf
INSTRUCTIONS
Word Limit 2500 words (excluding appendix and reference list)
Refer to the Journal Article Attached in the email as a guide on how to report
the results of the data analysis.
E-VIEWS is the preferred software for data analysis but if you are not
conversant with it you can use STATA or SPSS.
The deadline for this assignment is midday 21
st
,November 2016.
1
You have been allocated monthly time-series data for the United States
over the period January 1980-December 2009. The data refer to the following
variables:
S :the nominal stock price of a given company;
FED :the nominal short-term interest rate, measured by the effective federal
funds ratea (yields in percentage per annum);
IP :the level of industrial production.
Let NSRt be the monthly stock returns of the assigned company. Consider
the following regression model:
NSRt = β1 + β2 · FEDt + ut, (1)
where FEDt is assumed to be a stationary series.
1. Report the time series plots of the series and the scatter plot. Comment
on the graphs. [10%]
2. Use Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) to estimat.
The Effect of Capital Structure on Profitability of Energy American Firms:inventionjournals
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Business and Management. IJBMI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Business and Management, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
Determinants of Corporate SocialResponsibility Disclosure .docxduketjoy27252
Determinants of Corporate Social
Responsibility Disclosure Ratings
by Spanish Listed Firms Carmelo Reverte
ABSTRACT. The aim of this paper is to analyze whether
a number of firm and industry characteristics, as well as
media exposure, are potential determinants of corporate
social responsibility (CSR) disclosure practices by Spanish
listed firms. Empirical studies have shown that CSR dis-
closure activism varies across companies, industries, and
time (Gray et al., Accounting, Auditing & Accountability
Journal 8(2), 47–77, 1995; Journal of Business Finance &
Accounting 28(3/4), 327–356, 2001; Hackston and Milne,
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9(1), 77–108,
1996; Cormier and Magnan, Journal of International Finan-
cial Management and Accounting 1(2), 171–195, 2003; Cor-
mier et al., European Accounting Review 14(1), 3–39, 2005),
which is usually justified by reference to several theoretical
constructs, such as the legitimacy, stakeholder, and agency
theories. Our findings evidence that firms with higher
CSR ratings present a statistically significant larger size and
a higher media exposure, and belong to more environ-
mentally sensitive industries, as compared to firms with
lower CSR ratings. However, neither profitability nor
leverage seem to explain differences in CSR disclosure
practices between Spanish listed firms. The most influen-
tial variable for explaining firms’ variation in CSR ratings is
media exposure, followed by size and industry. Therefore,
it seems that the legitimacy theory, as captured by those
variables related to public or social visibility, is the most
relevant theory for explaining CSR disclosure practices of
Spanish listed firms.
KEY WORDS: corporate social responsibility disclosure,
Spain
Introduction
Over the last few decades there has been a growing
public awareness of the role of corporations in
society. Many of the firms which have been credited
with contributing to economic and technological
progress have been criticized for creating social
problems. Issues such as pollution, waste, resource
depletion, product quality and safety, the rights and
status of workers, and the power of large corpora-
tions have become the focus of increasing attention
and concern. In this context, companies have been
increasingly urged to become accountable to a wider
audience than shareholder and creditor groups. As a
matter of fact, public awareness and interest in
environmental and social issues and increased
attention in mass media have resulted in more social
disclosures from corporations in the last two decades
(Deegan and Gordon, 1996; Gray et al., 1995;
Hooghiemstra, 2000; Kolk, 2003). In the European
Union context, the publication of the Green Paper
(2001) by the European Commission launched a
wide debate on how the EU could promote cor-
porate social responsibility (CSR). Although there is
still no universal definition of CSR (Godfrey and
Hatch, 2007), mos.
A framework for the analysis of interview data from multiple field research s...Afzaal Ali
Anne Lillis is a Professor of Management Accounting and Head Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Perfor...Sustainable Brands
This 2011 report is a must-read for sustainability executives and a valuable go-to resource for engaging senior management in the benefits of sustainability integration.
Abstract
We investigate the effect of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Using a matched sample of 180 US companies, we find that corporations that voluntarily adopted sustainability policies by 1993 -- termed as High Sustainability companies -- exhibit by 2009, distinct organizational processes compared to a matched sample of firms that adopted almost none of these policies -- termed as Low Sustainability companies. We find that the boards of directors of these companies are more likely to be formally responsible for sustainability and top executive compensation incentives are more likely to be a function of sustainability metrics. Moreover, High Sustainability companies are more likely to have established processes for stakeholder engagement, to be more long-term oriented, and to exhibit higher measurement and disclosure of nonfinancial information. Finally, we provide evidence that High Sustainability companies significantly outperform their counterparts over the long-term, both in terms of stock market as well as accounting performance.
DATA OUTPUT.docx
GRAPHS FOR QUESTION ONE
MONTHLY STOCK RETURNS
SCATTERPLOT PLUS REGRESSION LINE
TABLE FOR QUESTION TWO (REGRESSION OUTPUT FOR MODEL ONE)
GRAPHS FOR QUESTION THREE
TABLES AND FIGURES FOR QUESTION TWO WHICH REQUIRES USE OF DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS
1.TEST FOR NORMALITY
2.HETEROSKEDASTICTY TEST USING THE WHITE METHOD
3.TEST FOR SERIAL CORRELATION USING LM TEST
USING HAC METHOD TO CORRECT HETEROSKEDASTICITY AND SERIAL CORRELATION (FIXING THE ERRORS)
QUESTION 5-USING CHOW TEST TO TEST WHETHER THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AFFECTED THE RELATIONSHIP
QUESTION 6-REGRESSION OUTPUT FOR MODEL 2
QUESTION 7: WALD TEST FOR TESTING JOINT HYPOTHESIS
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
808284868890929496980002040608
ResidualActualFitted
0
20
40
60
80
100
808284868890929496980002040608
General Dynamics Corp S
0
4
8
12
16
20
808284868890929496980002040608
Federal Funds Rate (Effective) FED
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
808284868890929496980002040608
NRSt
PROFESSOR'S COMMENTS.docx
1. In question 2, the model requires you to use the monthly stock returns to do the regression. By contrast, it is evident that you have used nominal stock prices instead of returns. This is totally wrong. You have not even made reference to the Discounted Cash flow model
2. In question 3 you are required to plot the actual values, the fitted values (predicted values) and the residuals and comment on model fitting. I am afraid that it apparently appears that you have not done so
3. You have not answered question four
4. You have not answered question five
5. Where is the answers for questions 6 and 7. To be precise the test for joint hypothesis required in question 7 is not shown and the outcome and the conclusions there in.
ECONOMETRICS ASSIGNMENT.pdf
INSTRUCTIONS
Word Limit 2500 words (excluding appendix and reference list)
Refer to the Journal Article Attached in the email as a guide on how to report
the results of the data analysis.
E-VIEWS is the preferred software for data analysis but if you are not
conversant with it you can use STATA or SPSS.
The deadline for this assignment is midday 21
st
,November 2016.
1
You have been allocated monthly time-series data for the United States
over the period January 1980-December 2009. The data refer to the following
variables:
S :the nominal stock price of a given company;
FED :the nominal short-term interest rate, measured by the effective federal
funds ratea (yields in percentage per annum);
IP :the level of industrial production.
Let NSRt be the monthly stock returns of the assigned company. Consider
the following regression model:
NSRt = β1 + β2 · FEDt + ut, (1)
where FEDt is assumed to be a stationary series.
1. Report the time series plots of the series and the scatter plot. Comment
on the graphs. [10%]
2. Use Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) to estimat.
The Effect of Capital Structure on Profitability of Energy American Firms:inventionjournals
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Business and Management. IJBMI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Business and Management, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
Determinants of Corporate SocialResponsibility Disclosure .docxduketjoy27252
Determinants of Corporate Social
Responsibility Disclosure Ratings
by Spanish Listed Firms Carmelo Reverte
ABSTRACT. The aim of this paper is to analyze whether
a number of firm and industry characteristics, as well as
media exposure, are potential determinants of corporate
social responsibility (CSR) disclosure practices by Spanish
listed firms. Empirical studies have shown that CSR dis-
closure activism varies across companies, industries, and
time (Gray et al., Accounting, Auditing & Accountability
Journal 8(2), 47–77, 1995; Journal of Business Finance &
Accounting 28(3/4), 327–356, 2001; Hackston and Milne,
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9(1), 77–108,
1996; Cormier and Magnan, Journal of International Finan-
cial Management and Accounting 1(2), 171–195, 2003; Cor-
mier et al., European Accounting Review 14(1), 3–39, 2005),
which is usually justified by reference to several theoretical
constructs, such as the legitimacy, stakeholder, and agency
theories. Our findings evidence that firms with higher
CSR ratings present a statistically significant larger size and
a higher media exposure, and belong to more environ-
mentally sensitive industries, as compared to firms with
lower CSR ratings. However, neither profitability nor
leverage seem to explain differences in CSR disclosure
practices between Spanish listed firms. The most influen-
tial variable for explaining firms’ variation in CSR ratings is
media exposure, followed by size and industry. Therefore,
it seems that the legitimacy theory, as captured by those
variables related to public or social visibility, is the most
relevant theory for explaining CSR disclosure practices of
Spanish listed firms.
KEY WORDS: corporate social responsibility disclosure,
Spain
Introduction
Over the last few decades there has been a growing
public awareness of the role of corporations in
society. Many of the firms which have been credited
with contributing to economic and technological
progress have been criticized for creating social
problems. Issues such as pollution, waste, resource
depletion, product quality and safety, the rights and
status of workers, and the power of large corpora-
tions have become the focus of increasing attention
and concern. In this context, companies have been
increasingly urged to become accountable to a wider
audience than shareholder and creditor groups. As a
matter of fact, public awareness and interest in
environmental and social issues and increased
attention in mass media have resulted in more social
disclosures from corporations in the last two decades
(Deegan and Gordon, 1996; Gray et al., 1995;
Hooghiemstra, 2000; Kolk, 2003). In the European
Union context, the publication of the Green Paper
(2001) by the European Commission launched a
wide debate on how the EU could promote cor-
porate social responsibility (CSR). Although there is
still no universal definition of CSR (Godfrey and
Hatch, 2007), mos.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
3. CAPITAL BUDGETING PRAGTIGES 81
with firm size and use of information technology?
3. How useful is the longitudinal survey approach as an empirical research
instrument?
The remainder of the paper is structured as follows. The next section describes
the sample and conduct of the surveys since 1975. This is followed by an ana-
lysis of the results and the main trends that can be observed. Findings are then
discussed within a wider context and the impacts of firm size and computer
usage explored. Finally, the usefulness of the longitudinal approach and the
paper's conclusions are presented.
SURVEY DESIGN AND SAMPLE
The original postal survey conducted in 1980 was designed to address two im-
portant issues. First, as a state-of-the-art survey, it sought to provide insights
into the developments in the formal capital investment processes of large firms
(Pike, 1982). Secondly, it sought to explain corporate investment practices in
terms of capital constraints, principal-agent conflict and organisation context
(Pike, 1983, 1985, and 1986).
The two subsequent surveys, while introducing other elements of research
interest, retained the original questions on capital budgeting practices. All
three surveys asked respondents to report current capital budgeting practices
for larger projects but the 1980 survey also asked for practices in 1975.^ Pike's
(1983) survey on capital budgeting practices in 1975 and 1980 drew a sample
of 208 firms from the largest 300 UK quoted companies as measured by mar-
ket capitalisation. From that sample 150 usable responses (72%) were ob-
tained. By 1986, the year of the next survey, ten of the 150 firms had ceased
trading. One hundred usable responses were obtained from the remaining
140 firms (71 %).
In 1992, it was decided to revisit the same 140 firms responding in 1980 and
trading in 1986. A further eleven had either ceased trading or been acquired,
leaving a sample of 129 firms. Questionnaires were distributed to finance di-
rectors, or equivalent, in these companies in May 1992. Reminders were sent
four weeks later, followed up by telephone calls where necessary. A total of 99
usable responses were received, giving a response rate of 78.1 per cent. Analy-
sis of non-respondents (by comparing late against early responders and estab-
lishing the reason for non-response) suggested that non-response bias is
unlikely to be a significant problem. To restore the number of respondents to
100 firms it was decided to replace a non-respondent in 1992 with a company
surveyed in 1980 and 1986, hitherto excluded from the analysis. This left 100
firmswhich were common to the 1975,1980 and 1992 data samples. However,
22 of these firms were not in the 100 respondents from the 1986 survey, A sim-
ple validity test was conducted which suggested that, despite minor differences
in the respondents, the 1986 results could reasonably be compared with all
e Rlackwcll Publishers Ltd 1996
5. CAPITAL BUDGETING PRACTICES 83
Table 3
Combined Evaluation Techniques (Response: 100 Companies)
Year ofSurvey
Firms using:
No Methods
A Single Method
PB
AARR
IRR
NPV
Two Methods
PB/AARR
PB/IRR
PB/NPV
AARR/IRR
AARR/NPV
IRR/NPV
Three Methods
PB/AARR/IRR
PB/AARR/NPV
PB/IRR/NPV
AARR/IRR/NPV
Four Methods
PB/AARR/IRR/NPV
Total:
1975
%
2
14
12
5
0
31
14
14
4
0
1
1
34
7
4
10
1
22
ii
100
1980
%
0
12
7
4
1
24
13
15
6
2
1
4
40
10
4
9
1
24
12
100
1986
%
6
0
2
0
8
10
8
5
2
1
3
29
5
3
21
0
29
34
100
1992
%
0
4
0
0
0
4
8
9
6
0
0
5
28
5
1
26
0
32
36
100
Key: PB: Payback period. IRR: Internal rate of return.
AARR: Average accounting rate ofreturn. NPV: Net present value.
be found in NPV adoption, with 42 per cent of the survey sample introducing
NPV since 1975. While an increased awareness of the time-value of money in
decision making may have assisted in its rapid growth, a more likely explana-
tion lies in the increasing use of computer spreadsheets, making NPV calcula-
tions as straightforward a calculation to the user as simple payback method.
The popular view that academics prefer NPV while practitioners have a
predilection for IRR is rapidly becoming part of financial folklore, as is the
oft cited 'theory-practice' gap problem (e.g. Northcott, 1991). One is tempted
to ask 'What Gap?' Less sophisticated methods, such as payback and average
accounting rate of return (AARR) clearly have practical merit and even a de-
gree or two of academic blessing as numerous authors have previously advo-
O Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1996
6. 84 PIKE
cated (e.g., Weingartner, 1969;Sundem, 1974; Longbottom and Wiper, 1977;
and Boardman et al., 1982). Northcott rightly emphasises that while the the-
ory-practice gap may be narrowing, we know very little about how managers
use DCF information in the decision making process.
It is clear that few companies operate a single investment method to the ex-
clusion ofall others. Of particular interest, therefore, is to assess how the mix
has changed over the review period and what implications can be drawn from
such. Table 3 shows that whereas in 1975 most firms adopted either one or two
methods (typically PB and AARR), by 1992 a combination ofall four methods
(PB, AARR, IRR and NPV) was most common (36%), a threefold increase
since 1980. This movement towards a 'more the merrier' approach to evalua-
tion may be due to the ease of calculation with the aid of computers, but,
equally, it may reflect the need to explore the many faceted aspects of invest-
ment performance.
One relatively new dimension relates to non-financial considerations, par-
ticularly for new technology projects (Kaplan, 1986; and Finnie, 1988). Tra-
ditional capital budgeting methods are most appropriate in assessing non-
strategic investment alternatives where the intangible elements and risks are
low. Respondents were invited to discuss the role of non-financial criteria in
investment appraisal. Emphasis was placed by many upon the impact of in-
vestment on improvements in quality, reduced cycle time, reduced waste,
and improved delivery performance.
Planning and Control Procedures
Table 4 summarises the capital budgeting procedures employed by respond-
ing firms. Regarding planning, or pre-decision, procedures, only modest in-
creases are observed in the operation of longer-term capital budgets, use of
manuals and use ofa screening/review body for assessing proposals. The trend
away from viewing capital budgeting as a specialist activity continues, with
only 23 per cent of responding firms having staff engaged full time in capital
budgeting.
While pre-decision controls are little changed, post-decision controls have
significantly improved in two respects: first, greater controls are employed
where cost over-runs are considered likely; and second, post-completion
audits are now more commonplace.^ It is interesting to observe how such
audits have steadily increased in usage over the 17 years with 72 per cent of
respondent firms now adopting this procedure. Post audits have two main
aims. First, they may encourage more thorough and realistic appraisals of fu-
ture investment projects and secondly, they may facilitate major overhauls of
ongoing projects. While not without its problems, the growth in the use of
audits suggests that it confers very real benefits on the firm.
Risk Appraisal Methods
Perhaps the sharpest trend in capital budgeting practices is to be found in the
formal analysis of risk; usage rates have moved from 26 per cent in 1975 to 92
& Blackwcll Publishers Ltd 1996
7. CAPITAL BUDGETING PRACTICES 85
Table 4
Investment Planning and Control Procedures (100 large firms)
Year of Survey 1975 1980 1986 1992
Pre-Decision Controls % % % %
Firms with:
A capital budget which looks
beyond two years
An up-to-date capital budgeting
manual or procedures
A formal screening and review
body for proposals
At least one full-time person
engaged in capital budgeting
A regular review ofminimum
rates ofreturn required
Evaluate approved projects if
cost over-runs likely
Monitor project performance
once operational
Require post-completion audits
on most major projects
Note:
* Size a significant factor in degree of use at the 5% level.
per cent in 1992 (see Table 5). In this regard, the emphasis on risk assessment,
so dominant over the past two decades in the research literature, is matched by
an equal concern for its effects in practice. Bierman's (1986) US survey found
that handling uncertainty in capital projects was one of the finance officer's
major challenges.
Table 5 shows that the previous strong increase in shortening the payback
period to counter project risk appears to have reached a plateau at around 60
per cent usage. Easily the most prevalent approach is to apply sensitivity ana-
lysis (88%), along with its close relative, best/worst case analysis (95%). In
this respect, it would seem thatfirmsrequire risk-sensitive variables to be iden-
tified, but do not normally require project risk to be measured.
Use of probability analysis has gained increasing support over the survey
period with 48 per cent offirmsclaiming recent experience in analysing invest-
ment projects. This experience, however, is still very limited with only 7 per
cent of firms using probability analysis regularly. Recently, Ho and Pike
(1992) found no evidence that the adoption ofprobability analysis led to a sig-
nificant change in capital expenditure or corporate performance. However,
@ Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1996
57*
65*
78
31*
43
72
69
33
64*
76*
84
33*
61
82
76
46
64*
84
83
26*
71
85
84
64
68*
86*
85
23*
69*
92
84
72*
9. CAPITAL BUDGETING PRACTICES 87
Table 6
Inflation Techniques — Trend (Response: 99 Companies)
Year of Survey
Firms which:
Consider at risk analysis or
sensitivity stage
Specify cash flows in constant prices
and apply a real rate of return
Adjust for estimated changes
in general inflation
Specify different rates for
all costs and revenues
1975
%
14
33
30
23*
1980
%
16
39
39
33*
1986
%
44
69
58
53*
1992
%
39
70
58
56*
Note:
* Size a significant factor in degree of use at the 5% level.
practices where regularity of use (i.e. rarely, often, mostly, always) is asso-
ciated with size offirm(using chi-square tests). Use ofIRR and NPV continue
to be highly associated withfirmsize. In fact, there is a remarkable consistency
in size and investment sophistication association over the 17 years under re-
view.
Ifanything, the sophistication disparity between investment practices with-
in smaller and larger firms' surveys has increased. Respondents were asked to
assess how, over the lastfiveyears, their firm's capital budgeting process and
techniques had changed. Table 7 reveals that while 63 per cent thought there
had been a clear movement towards greater sophistication, the increase was
significantly greater (at the 5% level) for larger firms (74%) than for smaller
ones (39%).
This does not necessarily mean that it is company size that determines the
degree of capital budgeting sophistication in firms. It was found by Pike
(1988) that the use of computers in capital budgeting was a powerful moder-
ating variable in explaining sophistication levels. Nearly three-quarters ofthe
respondents are now using computer packages/systems, half of them on a reg-
ular basis (Table 7). However, size offirmis strongly associated with compu-
ter usage. It is therefore suggested that it is size of firm which determines
degree ofcomputer usage which, in combination, influence capital budgeting
sophistication.
Pike and Sharp (1989) examined the trend in the use of sophisticated ap-
praisal techniques based on Pike's earlier surveys. A technology forecasting
model (the logistic model) was fitted to the observations between 1975 and
1986. Factor analysis suggested that the techniques should be divided into
two groups: Financial Techniques (IRR, NPV, Sensitivity Analysis) and
Management Science Techniques (Probability Analysis, Beta Analysis,
Mathematical Programming, Computer Simulation, Decision Theory and
e Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1996
11. CAPITAL BUDGETING PRACTICES 89
of computer-based investment packages and financial appraisal techniques
(Pike, 1988) suggests that SA (88% usage) tends to be used as part of a stan-
dard approach with DCF techniques (NPV or IRR), which also had an 88 per
cent usage rate.
CONCLUSIONS
This paper has sought to present the findings from a longitudinal study based
on surveys conducted at approximately five-year intervals between 1975 and
1992. In so doing it answers the call by Sangster (1993) fora time series study
based on replicated surveys at regular intervals 'using similar survey popula-
tions, questions and analysis' to enable more valid conclusions to be drawn
from observed changes in practice. In addition, the high response rates for all
three postal surveys (in excess of 70 per cent) suggest that researchers and re-
viewers need not accept the oft-cited argument that low response rates are in-
evitable in postal surveys, thus making the value of such work questionable.
This paper has sought to remind readers of the pervasiveness of the problem
of bias in capital budgeting surveys and to caution against drawing trends
based on survey comparison conducted by different authors obtaining varied
response rates.
Over the 17-year review period we have witnessed the greatest changes in
the areas of risk analysis, NPV analysis and post-completion audits. This re-
fiects the fact that firms have become increasingly aware (1) of the need to
assess the possibility of project failure and (2) ofthe importance of assessing
the quality ofthe capital budgeting and forecasting process through post-com-
pletion audits.
Many of the findings here are consistent with those found by Sangster
(1993). For example, the usage of discounted cash flow techniques have in-
creased with each survey, as has the tendency to employ a combination of ap-
praisal methods rather than rely upon a single technique. Other findings,
however, are not consistent with those of Sangster who, based on survey com-
parison, argued that use of DCF methods is no longer related to company size,
the popularity of ARR has markedly declined, and size is a factor in the pay-
back usage (pp. 316-319). The comparison of broadly the same respondents
over a 17-year review period suggests that firm size is still significantly asso-
ciated with degree of use for DCF methods but not for payback, and the use
of average accounting rate of return is unchanged.
It is suggested that firm size perse may not be the direct causal factor in deter-
mining use of sophisticated methods; size of firm infiuences the use of computer-
based capital budgeting packages which, in turn, influence the use of discounting
methods, sensitivity analysis, and risk analysis techniques. Once size ceases to be
associated with use of computers in capital budgeting, it is envisaged that it will
also have far less impact on capital budgeting technique usage rates.
We have reported the general increase in so-called sophisticated capital
budgeting techniques to a point where the gap between theory and practice
e Blackwdl Publishers Ltd 1996
12. 90 PIKE
is trivial, at least for large firms, particularly regarding standard textbook
methods. What then are seen as the main factors which have influenced the
increase over the 17 year period? The three main causal factors are viewed as
technical, educational and economic in nature.
1. Throughout the 1980s the advent of relatively inexpensive computer soft-
ware has revolutionalised the practices of many areas of finance, but none
more so than capital budgeting, particularly DCF type appraisals and sen-
sitivity analysis. The impact of computing advances has been analysed in
earlier sections of the paper.
2. This could have created a rather different problem where a new generation
of computer literate managers could produce investment performance in-
dicators but not interpret them. This leads us to the second major change in
the review period: the mzyor expansion in management education, with
investment appraisal a key element in the curriculum. Perhaps it is now
time to ask whether the benefits of DCF techniques have been 'oversold'
and whether greater attention should be paid to viewing investment within
a wider strategic framework.
3. The review period experienced contrasting economic conditions. When,
for example, inflation, capital rationing and economic uncertainty were
most acutely experienced we saw a significant change in the use of certain
investment practices in an attempt to handle the adverse effects of such eco-
nomic factors.
What implications for further research emanate from the review? First,
there is an important role for longitudinal research studies to play. Given that
over a 17 year period the sample suffered a mortality rate of only 15 per cent,
such studies, whilst time consuming, are entirely feasible. Secondly, with the
ever reducing gap between theory and practice, researchers need to concen-
trate their efforts on key areas. It is suggested that two such areas are the ana-
lysis of project risk and the valuation of capital investment options.
We are left with the question: is there still a role for capital budgeting status
postal surveys? It is the author's view that while the occasional replication sur-
vey, such as that described in this paper, has some utility, offering insights into
capital budgeting trends and the practical problems with theoretically pre-
ferred approaches, further general capital budgeting status surveys would
contribute little to the existing body of empirical knowledge. Indeed, poorly
designed and conducted surveys may prove counterproductive.
This paper has sought to provide a more reliable and comprehensive analy-
sis of how capital budgeting practices in large UK companies have evolved in
recent years and, in so doing, provide a clearer backdrop against which earlier
studies can be interpreted and future studies enacted. It is suggested that the
more promising research exploration is likely to be found in the in-depth prob-
ings afforded through the case study method (e.g. Bower 1971; Marsh et al.,
1988; and Butler et al., 1993) and specifically targeted event studies observing
capital budgeting responses to organisational change (e.g. Larcker, 1983) or
£> Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1996
13. CAPITAL BUDGETING PRAGTICES 91
investment performance reaction to significant capital budgeting change (e.g.
Haka et al., 1985; and Ho and Pike, 1992).
NOTES
Examples of capital budgeting relationship studies are found in Klammer (1972), Moore and
Reichart (1983), Pike (1986) and Ho and Pike (1993). Status surveys include Mclntyre and
Coulthurst (1985) and Mills and Herbert (1987).
Two such replication studies are already in existence, Klammer and Walker (1984) in the United
States and Rke (1988) in the UK. However, no such work has been conducted since the mid-eigh-
ties.
It is recognised that asking respondents to provide information on earlier practices may give rise
to errors of recall and additional care should therefore be given in interpreting 1975 results.
The test involved assessing whether responses to key questions in the survey for the 22 firms were
significantly different to the remainder ofthe sample in 1975,1980 and 1992. No systematic differ-
ences were observed. The 22 firms were, of course, part ofthe 150 respondents to the 1980 survey.
As the definitions for monitoring performance and post-completion audits were not given, respon-
dents may well have interpreted the questions rather differently.
REFERENCES
Adelson, R.M. (1970),'Discounted Gash Flow — GanVVe Discount It?'Journalo/Business Finance (Sum-
mer), pp. 50-66.
Aggarwal, R. (l980),'Gorporate Use of Sophisticated Gapital BudgetingTechniques: A Strategic Per-
spective and a Gritique of Survey Results', Inter/aces (April), pp. 31—34.
Bierman, H. (1986), Implementation of Capital Budgeting Techniques: Survey and Synthesis (Financial Man-
agement Association).
Boardman, G.M.,W.J. Reinhard and S.G. Gelec (1982) 'The Role ofthe Payback Period in theTheory
and Application of Duration to Gapital Budgeting', Journal ofBusiness Finance & Accounting,'Vol. 9,
No. 4 (Winter), pp. 511-522.
Boersema,J.M. (1978), Capital Budgeting Practices Including the Impact of Inflation (Ganadian Institute of
Ghartered Accountants).
Bower, J.L. (1971), Managing the ResourceAllocation Process (Irwin).
Butler, R., L. Davies, R. Pike andJ. Sharp (1993), Strategic Investment Decisions: Theory, Practice andProcess
(Routledge).
Garsberg. B. and A. Hope (1976), Business Investment Decisions Under Inflation: Theory and Practice
(IGAEW).
Goulthurst, N.J. (1986), 'Accounting for Inflation in Gapital Investment: The State of the Art and
Science', Accounting and Business Research (Winter), pp. 33-42.
Fama, E.F. and K.R. French (1992),'The Gross-Section of Expected Stock Returns', Journal ofFinance
CJune), pp. 427-465.
Finnie, J. (1988),'The Role of Financial Appraisal in Decisions to Acquire Advanced Manufacturing
Technology', Accounting andBusiness Research (Spring), pp. 133—140.
Haka, S.F, L.A. Gordon and G.E. Pinches (1985),'Sophisticated Gapital Budgeting Selection Techni-
ques and Firm Performance', TheAccounting Review (October), pp. 651—669.
Ho, S.S.M. and R.H. Pike (1992),'Adoption of Probabilistic Risk Analysis in Gapital Budgeting and
Gorporate Investment', JournalofBusiness Finance & Accounting,Vo. 19, No. 3 (April), pp.387—405
Jones, G.J. (1980), Financial Planning and Control: A Survey of Practices by UK Companies (Occasional Paper
Series: Institute of Gost and Management Accountants).
(1986),'Fmancial Planning and Control Practices in UKGompanies: A Longitudinal Study',
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Summer), pp. 161—184.
Kaplan, R.S. (1986),'Must GIM beJustified by Faith Aone?'Harvard Business Review (March-April),
pp. 87-95.
Klammer, T P. (1972), 'Empirical Evidence of the Adoption of Sophisticated Gapital Budgeting Tech-
niques', JournalofBusiness (July), pp.69—82.
O Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1996
14. 92 PIKE
Klammer,XP. and M.C. Walker (1984),'The Continuing Increase in the Use of Sophisticated Capital
BudgetingTechniques', California Management Review (Fall), pp. 137-151.
Lapsley, I. (1986) 'Investment Appraisal in Public Service Organisations', Management Accounting
(June), pp. 28-31.
Larcker, D.F. (1983),'Association Between Performance Adoption and Capital Investment', Joumal of
Accounting andEconomics (April), pp.3—30.
Longbottom, D.A. and G. Wiper (1977),'An Investigation into the Application of Decision Analysis in
UK Companies', Omega,Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 207-215.
Lowenstein, L. (1991), Sense andNonsense in Corporate Finance (NewVbrk: Addison-Wesley).
Marsh, P., P. Barwise, K.Thomas and R.Wensley (1988),'Managing Strategic Investment Decisions in
Large Diversified Companies', in A.M. Pettigrew (ed.) Competitiveness and the Management Process
(Blackwell).
Mclntyre, A.D. and N.J. Coulthurst (1985), Capital Budgeting Practices in Medium-sized Businesses — A
Survey (Chartered Institute of Management Accountants).
Mills, R.W. and PJ.A. Herbert (1987), Corporate and Divisional Influence in Capital Budgeting (Chartered
Institute of Management Accountants).
Moore, J.S. and A.K Reichart (1983),'An Analysis of Financial Management Techniques Currently
Employed by Large US Corporations', Joumal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 10, No. 4
(Winter), pp. 623-645.
Northcott, D. (1991),'Rationality and Decision Making in Capital Budgeting', British AccountingReview
(September), pp. 219-234.
Pike, R.H. (1982), Capital Budgeting in the 1930s (ICMA Occasional Paper Series).
(1983), 'The Capital Budgeting Behaviour and Corporate Characteristics of Capital-Con-
strained Firms', Joumal ofBusiness Finance & Accounting,Vo. 10, No.4 (Winter), pp. 663-671.
(1985),'Owner-Manager Conflict and the Role of The Payback Method', Accounting andBusi-
ness Research (Winter), pp. 47-52.
(1986),'The Design of Capital Budgeting Processes and the Corporate Context', Managerial
and Decision Economics,Vo. 7, pp. 187—195.
(1988),'An Empirical Study of the Adoption of Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Practices and
Decision-Making Effectiveness', Accounting andBusiness Research (Autumn), pp.341—351.
-andj. Sharp (1989),'Trends in the Use of Management ScienceTechniques in Capital Budget-
ing', Managerial and Decision Economics,Vol. 10, pp. 135-140.
Rappaport, A. (1979),'A Critique of Capital Budgeting Questionnaires', Interfaces (May).
Rockley, L.E. (1973), Investmentfor Profitability (London: Business Books).
Rosenblatt, M.J. and J.V. Jucker (1979),'Capital Expenditure Decision Making: Some Tools and
Trends', Interfaces (February), pp. 63-69.
Sangster, A. (1993),'Capital Investment Appraisaliechniques: A Survey of Current Usage', Joumal of
Business finance & Accounting,/ol 20, No. 3 (April), pp. 307-333.
Scapens, R.W. andT.J. Sale (1981),'Performance Measurement and Formal Capital Expenditure Con-
trols in Divisionalised Companies', Journal ofBusiruss Finance & Accounting, Vol. 8, No3 (Au-
tumn), pp. 389^19.
Sundem, G.L. (1974),'Evaluating Simplified Capital Budgeting Models Using aTime-State Preference
Metric',The Accounting Review (April), pp. 306-321.
Wallace, R.S.O. and C.J. Mellor (1988),'Nonresponse Bias in Mail Accounting Surveys: A Pedagogic
Note', British Accounting Review (August), pp. 131-140.
Weingarmer, H.M. (1969),'Some NewViews on the Payback Period and Capital Budgeting Decisions',
Management Science (August), pp. 594-607.
Westwick, C.A. and PS.D. Shohet (1976), Investment AppraisalandInflation (ICAEW).
O Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1996