This document provides information on different types of academic articles, including editorials, letters to the editor, case reports, original research articles, review articles, and book reviews. It describes the purpose and structure of each type of article. For original research articles specifically, it outlines the typical sections - title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, acknowledgments, and references - and provides guidance on what should be included in each section.
3. • Written by the editor or someone invited by the editor
•It includes
1. Critiques of original articles published in the same issue of the
journal
2. Concise reviews of topics
3. Topics on very recent developments that are deemed by the editor
to be important to readers of the journal and the community.
4. 1. Pick a significant topic that has a current news angle and would interest
readers.
2. Collect information and facts.
3. State the opinion briefly in the fashion of a thesis statement
4. Explain the issue objectively and tell why this situation is important
5. Give opposing viewpoint first with its quotations and facts
HOW TO WRITE AN EDITORIAL
5. 6. Refute (reject) the other side and develop your case using facts,
details, figures, quotations. Pick apart the other side's logic.
7. Repeat key phrases to reinforce an idea into the reader's minds.
8. Give a realistic solution(s) to the problem that goes beyond
common knowledge. Encourage critical thinking and pro-active
reaction.
9. Wrap it up in a concluding punch that restates your opening
remark (thesis statement).
10. Keep it to 500 words; make every work count; never use "I"
6. 1. Explain or interpret: Editors often use these editorials to explain or
opine on a particular issue.
2. Criticize: They criticize actions, decisions or situations while
providing solutions to the problem identified. Immediate purpose is
to get readers to see the problem, not the solution.
3. Persuade: Editorials of persuasion aim to immediately see the
solution, not the problem. From the first paragraph, readers will be
encouraged to take a specific, positive action. Political endorsements
are good examples of editorials of persuasion.
4. Praise: These editorials commend researchers and organizations
for something done well. They are not as common as the other
three.
OBJECTIVES
7. Letter-to-editor is the fastest way for printing an article.
We have read an article and found a terrible mistake in that article.
We immediately write a letter to the editor of the journal which has published
that article and state that we have read the article and found a problem.
If we are right, the editor must print a letter in the first upcoming publication
and reject the previous article (in case the problem fundamentally affects the
outcome of that research).
This way the other scientists who want to use that article will refer to the
revision, not to the previous wrong claim.
2.LETTER TO EDITOR
10. To provide answers to questions about behavior by
using the scientific method.
Descriptive (to “describe’)
Correlation (to “predict”)
Causal-(to “control, explain causation”)
◦ Experimental
◦ Comparative
12. Will determine whether paper gets read
Long title is avoided
Abbreviations are avoided
13. Main objective is stated
Important results are stated
Major conclusions and significance are summarised
Acronyms are avoided
Writen and rewriten until flawless
Word limit ranges from 150 to 250.
14. In the introduction we
Define and clarify the state of the topic by citing
key literature that has laid the groundwork for the
research. This review of the literature will identify
relations, contradictions, gaps, and inconsistencies
between previous investigations and the present
one, and suggest the next step in the investigation
chain, which will be the hypothesis.
The introduction is written in the present tense
because it is ongoing information.
15. Specify the study design
Define the study subjects
Describe how the data will be collected
Outline the study interventions
End points
Describe sample size calculation
A brief note of natural history of the disease/topic and associated
issues relevant to the topic
16.
17. This section reports the findings from our research.
It is written primarily in the past tense.
The research results are usually most carefully read and
should provide a detailed plan and should be well
documented.
It is essential that graphic and textual part of the article is
clearly shown.
Results can be displayed in tables or figures.
18. In Discussion we
Interpretate the results
We link results to original purposes and hypotheses
State why the results turned out the way they did
Identify the study’s limitations
Suggest steps for further research
The theoretical and practical research outcomes are discussed.
19. We State the key findings gained from the research.
This section should not introduce new information.
It should be short, clear and precise. It is necessary to:
make the final statement of what logically follows from
the results of the work.
Sometimes the results and discussion are combined.
20. In the Acknowledgments we name persons that are
not an author but which assisted us when conducting
the research, writing up the article etc. Here we also
mention the sources of funding that supported the
research.
21. Appendices contain information that is not essential
for understanding the paper, but that further clarifies a
point without burdening the body of the presentation.
An appendix is an optional part of the paper, and
usually used for online publications.
Examples of what might be put in an appendix are:
large tables, figures, maps; explanation of 'new'
statistical/ mathematical procedures; data collection
methods.
22. The reference is the information that is necessary to the
reader in identifying and finding used sources. The
basic rule when listing the sources used is that
references must be accurate, complete and should be
consistently applied.
It should be Relevant and Recent
24. 1.Narrative Reviews
Summarises research that lack explicit descriptions of systematic
methods to locate and synthesize articles.
Potentially biased
Qualitative analysis
2.Systematic Review
Summarises research that undergo rigorous methods to identify
appraise and synthesize research articles.
Quantitative analysis
TYPES OF REVIEW ARTICLES
25. 3.Meta Analysis
It is a statistical analysis that combines the results of
multiple scientific studies.
A key benefit of this approach is the aggregation of information
leading to a higher statistical power and more robust point
estimate than is possible from the measure derived from any
individual study.