1. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adam, M. (2004). Why worry about theory-dependence? Circularity,
minimal empiricality and reliability. International Studies in the
Philosophy of Science, 18, 117–132.
Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical
Psychology, 14, 43–64.
Ahn, W., Kalish, C., Gelman, S. A., Medin, D. L., Luhmann, C., Atran,
S., Coley, J. D., & Shafto, P. (2001). Why essences are essential in
the psychology of concepts. Cognition, 82, 59–69.
Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). The role
of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution.
Cognition, 54, 299–352.
Aiello, L. C., & Wheeler, P.(1995). The expensive-tissue hypothesis. The
brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution.
Current Anthropology, 36, 199–221.
Akins, K. (1996). Of sensory systems and the “aboutness” of mental
states. Journal of Philosophy, 93, 337–372.
Alibali, M., & DiRusso, A. A.(1999). The function of gesture in learning
to count: More than keeping track. Cognitive Development, 14,
37–56.
Andres, M., Seron, X., & Olivier, E. (2007). Contribution of hand motor
circuits to counting. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 563–
576.
Anggoro, F. K., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2005). The e↵ects
267

2. 268 Bibliography
of naming practices on children’s understanding of living things.
In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings
of the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
(pp. 139–144). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Antell, S. E., & Keating, D. P.(1983). Perception of numerical invariance
in neonates. Child Development, 54, 695–701.
Aristotle. (ca. 340 B.C.E.). Meteorologica. Retrieved May
20, 2011, from http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/
meteorology/book1.html.
Atran, S.(1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive
universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
21, 547–569.
Atran, S. (2001). The case for modularity: Sin or salvation? Evolution
and Cognition, 7, 1–10.
Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N. (2004). Evolution and devolution of
knowledge: A tale of two biologies. Journal of the Royal Anthropo-
logical Institute, 10, 395–420.
Aunger, R. (Ed.). (2000). Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics
as a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baillargeon, R.(2004). Infants’ reasoning about hidden objects: Evidence
for event-general and event-specific expectations. Developmental
Science, 7, 391–424.
Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E. S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object perma-
nence in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 20, 191–208.
Barabashev, A. G. (1997). In support of significant modernization of
original mathematical texts (in defense of presentism). Philosophia
Mathematica, 5, 21–41.
Barrett, H. C.(2004). Design versus descent in Shuar children’s reasoning
about animals. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 25–50.
Barrett, H. C. (2005). Enzymatic computation and cognitive modularity.
Mind & Language, 20, 259–287.
Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing
the debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628–647.
Barrett, J. L. (1998). Cognitive constraints on Hindu concepts of the
divine. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 608–619.
Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Lanham, MD:
AltaMira Press.
Barrett, J. L., Burdett, E. R., & Porter, T. J.(2009). Counterintuitiveness

3. Bibliography 269
in folktales: Finding the cognitive optimum. Journal of Cognition
and Culture, 9, 271–287.
Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a nonnatural en-
tity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology,
31, 219–247.
Barrett, J. L., & Nyhof, M. A. (2001). Spreading non-natural concepts:
The role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and trans-
mission of cultural materials. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1,
69–100.
Barth, H., La Mont, K., Lipton, J., Dehaene, S., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke,
E. S.(2006). Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children.
Cognition, 98, 199–222.
Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Bassi, M. (1988). On the Borana calendrical system: A preliminary field
report. Current Anthropology, 29, 619–624.
Benacerraf, P. (1973). Mathematical truth. Journal of Philosophy, 70,
661–680.
Berger, A., Tzur, G., & Posner, M. I. (2006). Infant brains detect arith-
metic errors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of
the United States of America, 103, 12649–12653.
Berger, L. R., Churchill, S. E., De Klerk, B., & Quinn, R. L. (2008).
Small-bodied humans from Palau, Micronesia. PLoS One, 3, e1780.
Bering, J. M. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 29, 453–462.
Bering, J. M. (2011). The God instinct. The psychology of souls, destiny
and the meaning of life. London: Nicholas Brealy.
Bering, J. M., McLeod, K., & Shackelford, T. (2005). Reasoning about
dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends. Human Nature, 16,
360–381.
Biro, D., & Matsuzawa, T. (2001a). Chimpanzee numerical competence:
Cardinal and ordinal skills. In T. Matsuzawa (Ed.), Primate origins
of human cognition and behavior (pp. 199–225). Tokyo: Springer.
Biro, D., & Matsuzawa, T. (2001b). Use of numerical symbols by the
chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Cardinals, ordinals, and the intro-
duction of zero. Animal Cognition, 4, 193–199.
Bisazza, A., Pi↵er, L., Serena, G., & Agrillo, C. (2010). Ontogeny of
numerical abilities in fish. PLoS ONE, 5, e15516.

4. 270 Bibliography
Blackburn, S. (2001). Normativity ` la mode. Journal of Ethics, 5, 139–
a
153.
Blaisdell, A. P., Sawa, K., Leising, K. J., & Waldmann, M. R. (2006).
Causal reasoning in rats. Science, 311, 1020–1022.
Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes’ baby. How child development explains what
makes us human. London: Arrow Books.
Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10, 147–
151.
Bloom, P. (2009). Religious belief as an evolutionary accident. In
J. Schloss & M. Murray (Eds.), The believing primate. Scientific,
philosophical, and theological reflections on the origin of religion
(pp. 118–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D. S.(2007). Childhood origins of adult resistance
to science. Science, 316, 996–997.
Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (1992). The origins of psychological axioms of
arithmetic and geometry. Mind & Language, 7, 409–416.
Blyth, E. (1835). An attempt to classify the “varieties” of animals, with
observations on the marked seasonal and other changes which nat-
urally take place in various British species, and which do not con-
stitute varieties. Magazine of Natural History, 8, 40–53.
Boesch, C., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Chimpanzee and human cultures.
Current Anthropology, 39, 591–614.
Bonatti, L., Frot, E., Zangl, R., & Mehler, J.(2002). The human first hy-
pothesis: Identification of conspecifics and individuation of objects
in the young infant. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 388–426.
Boudry, M., Blancke, S., & Braeckman, J. (2010). How not to attack
Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical misconceptions about
methodological naturalism. Foundations of Science, 15, 227–244.
Boulter, S. J. (2007). The “evolutionary argument” and the metaphilos-
ophy of commonsense. Biology & Philosophy, 22, 369–382.
Bowler, P. J.(2003). Evolution. The history of an idea (3rd ed.). Berkeley
& Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Bowler, P. J. (2008). What Darwin disturbed. Isis, 99, 560–567.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1995). Why does culture increase human
adaptability? Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 125–143.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J.(1996). Why culture is common, but cultural
evolution is rare. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 77–93.
Boyer, C. B.(1944). Fundamental steps in the development of numeration.

5. Bibliography 271
Isis, 35, 153–168.
Boyer, P. (1998). Cognitive tracks of cultural inheritance: How evolved
intuitive ontology governs cultural transmission. American Anthro-
pologist, 100, 876–889.
Boyer, P. (2000). Natural epistemology or evolved metaphysics? Devel-
opmental evidence for early-developed, intuitive, category-specific,
incomplete, and stubborn metaphysical presumptions. Philosophi-
cal Psychology, 13, 277–296.
Boyer, P.(2002). Religion explained. The evolutionary origins of religious
thought. London: Vintage.
Boyer, P., & Barrett, H. C. (2005). Domain specicity and intuitive ontol-
ogy. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology
(pp. 96–118). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates for religious con-
cepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive repre-
sentations. Cognitive Science, 25, 535–564.
Brannon, E. M.(2002). The development of ordinal numerical knowledge
in infancy. Cognition, 83, 223–240.
Brannon, E. M., & Terrace, H. S. (2002). The evolution and ontogeny of
ordinal numerical ability. In M. Beko↵, C. Allen, & G. M. Burghardt
(Eds.), The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectives
on animal cognition (pp. 197–204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Br¨uer, J., Kaminski, J., Riedel, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006).
a
Making inferences about the location of hidden food: Social dog,
causal ape. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120, 38–46.
Breuer, T., Ndoundou-Hockembal, M., & Fishlock, V. (2005). First ob-
servation of tool use in wild gorillas. PLoS Biology, 3, e380.S.
Brewer, W., Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2000). Explanation
in scientists and children. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.),
Explanation and cognition (pp. 279–298). Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
Brown, P., Sutikna, T., Morwood, M. J., Soejono, R. P., Jatmiko, Sap-
tomo, E. W., & Due, R. A. (2004). A new small-bodied hominin
from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature, 431, 1055–
1061.
Brunet, M., F., G., Pilbeam, D., Mackaye, H. T., Likius, A., Ahounta, D.,
Beauvilain, A., Blondel, C., Bocherens, H., Boisserie, J.-R., De Bo-
nis, L., Coppens, Y., Dejax, J., Denys, C., Duringer, P., Eisenmann,

6. 272 Bibliography
V., Fanone, G., Fronty, P., Geraads, D., Lehmann, T., Lihoreau, F.,
Louchart, A., Mahamat, A., Merceron, G., Mouchelin, G., Otero,
O., Campomanes, P. P., Ponce De Le´n, M., Rage, J. C., Sapanet,
o
M., Schuster, M., Sudre, J., Tassy, P., Valentin, X., Vignaud, P.,
Viriot, L., Zazzo, A., & Zollikofer, C. (2002). A new hominid from
the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa. Nature, 418, 145–151.
Bu↵on, comte de, G.-L. L. (1766). Histoire naturelle g´n´rale et par-
e e
ticuli`re. Avec la description du cabinet du roi (Vol. 14). Paris:
e
Imprimerie royale.
Buridan, J.(14th c. [2009]). Impetus and its applications. In T. McGrew,
M. Alspector-Kelly, & F. Allho↵ (Eds.), Philosophy of science. An
historical anthology (pp. 86–90). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Burkart, J., & Heschl, A. (2005, August). Do nonhuman primates un-
derstand the mentalistic content of seeing? Paper presented at the
Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy.
Bushnell, I. W. R. (2001). Mother’s face recognition in newborn infants:
Learning and memory. Infant and Child Development, 10, 67–74.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An
evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review,
100, 204–232.
Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.
Butterworth, B. (2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Jour-
nal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 3–18.
Butterworth, B., Reeve, R., Reynolds, F., & Lloyd, D.(2008). Numerical
thought with and without words: Evidence from indigenous Aus-
tralian children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the United States of America, 105, 13179–13184.
Buzaglo, M. (2002). The logic of concept expansion. Cambridge: Cam-
bridge University Press.
Cacciari, C., Levorato, M. C., & Cicogna, P.(1997). Imagination at work:
Conceptual and linguistic creativity in children. In T. B. Ward,
S. S. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought. An investigation
of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 145–177). Washington
D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Cain, C. R. (2006). Implications of the marked artifacts of the Middle
Stone Age of Africa. Current Anthropology, 47, 675–681.
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1999). A non-verbal false belief task: The
performance of children and great apes. Child Development, 70,

7. Bibliography 273
381–395.
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of
mind? 30 Years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 187–192.
Callaghan, T., Rochat, P., Lillard, A., Claux, M. L., Odden, H., Itakura,
S., Tapanya, S., & Singh, S. (2005). Synchrony in the onset of
mental-state reasoning. Evidence from five cultures. Psychological
Science, 16, 378–384.
Callebaut, W. (Ed.). (1993). Taking the naturalistic turn, or, how real
philosophy of science is done. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Cantlon, J. F., Brannon, E. M., Carter, E. J., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2006).
Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-old
children. PLoS Biology, 4, e125.
Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2003). What
are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review
of the clinical evidence. Neuropsychology, 20, 213–261.
Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2003). The organization of conceptual
knowledge: The evidence from category-specific deficits. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 7, 354–361.
Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge sys-
tems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of
Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1–34.
Carey, S. (2004). Bootstrapping and the origin of concepts. Daedalus,
133, 59–68.
Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S.(1996). Science and core knowledge. Philosophy
of Science, 63, 515–533.
Carnap, R.(1945). On inductive logic. Philosophy of Science, 12, 288–309.
Carreiras, M., Seghier, M. L., Baquero, S., Est´vez, A., Lozano, A., De-
e
vlin, J. T., & Price, C. J. (2009). An anatomical signature for
literacy. Nature, 461, 983–986.
Carruthers, P. (2002). The roots of scientific reasoning: Infancy, modu-
larity and the art of tracking. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Sie-
gal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 73–95). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of the mind. Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
Carruthers, P., Stich, S., & Siegal, M. (Eds.). (2002). The cognitive basis
of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cela-Conde, C. J., & Ayala, F. J. (2003). Genera of the human lin-

8. 274 Bibliography
eage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America, 100, 7684–7689.
Chambers, R.(1844). Vestiges of the natural history of creation. London:
John Churchill.
Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific
progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chemla, K. (2003). Generality above abstraction: The general expressed
in terms of the paradigmatic in mathematics in ancient China. Sci-
ence in Context, 16, 413–458.
Chemla, K., & Guo, S. (2004). Les neuf chapitres. Le classique
math´matique de la Chine ancienne et ses commentaires. Paris:
e
Dunod.
Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basic
are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading
behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517–537.
Chittka, L., & Niven, J. (2009). Are bigger brains better? Current
Biology, 19, 995–1008.
Chochon, F., Cohen, L., van de Moortele, P. F., & Dehaene, S. (1999).
Di↵erential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lob-
ules to number processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11,
617–630.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Den Haag & Paris: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chrisomalis, S.(2004). A cognitive typology for numerical notation. Cam-
bridge Archaeological Journal, 14, 37–52.
Chrisomalis, S. (2010). Numerical notation: A comparative history. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective. The nature
of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, A. (2006). Material symbols. Philosophical Psychology, 19, 291–
307.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58,
7–19.
Clendinnen, F. J.(1989). Evolutionary explanation and the justification of
belief. In K. Hahlweg & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Issues in evolutionary
epistemology (pp. 458–474). Albany, NY: State University of New
York Press.
Code, L.(1996). What is natural about epistemology naturalized? Amer-

9. Bibliography 275
ican Philosophical Quarterly, 33, 1–22.
Cohen, L. B., & Marks, K. S. (2002). How infants process addition and
subtraction events. Developmental Science, 5, 186–212.
Cordes, S., Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (2001). Variability signatures
distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small
numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 698–707.
Corsi, P. (2005). Before Darwin: Transformist concepts in European
natural history. Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 67–83.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994a). Beyond intuition and instinct blind-
ness: Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science. Cogni-
tion, 50, 41–77.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994b). Origins of domain specificity: The
evolution of functional organization. In L. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gel-
man (Eds.), Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and
culture (pp. 85–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisti-
cians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on
judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1–73.
Dacke, M., & Srinivasan, M. V. (2008). Evidence for counting in insects.
Animal Cognition, 11, 683–689.
Dantzig, T. (1954). Number, the language of science (4th, revised and
augmented ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). Di↵erential enhancement of work-
ing memory with mathematical versus verbal precocity. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 83, 48–56.
Dart, R. A. (1925). Australopithecus africanus: The man-ape of South
Africa. Nature, 115, 195–199.
Dartnall, T. (2005). Does the world leak into the mind? Active external-
ism, ‘internalism’ and epistemology. Cognitive Science, 29, 135–143.
Darwin, C. (1838). Notebook d: Transmutation of species. Retrieved De-
cember 15, 2009, from http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/
frameset?itemID=CUL-DAR123.-&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection
or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London:
John Murray.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.
London: John Murray.
Darwin, C. (1881). Letter 13230, C. Darwin to W. Graham, July 1881.

10. 276 Bibliography
Retrieved May 20, 2010, from http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/
entry-13230.
Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1983). The mathematical experience. London:
Pelican.
Dawkins, R.(1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mi✏in.
Dear, P. (2006). The intelligibility of nature. How science makes sense of
the world. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Decock, L. (2008). The conceptual basis of numerical abilities: One-
to-one correspondence versus the successor relation. Philosophical
Psychology, 21, 459–473.
De Cruz, H. (2006). Why are some numerical concepts more successful
than others? An evolutionary perspective on the history of number
concepts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 306–323.
De Cruz, H. (2008). An extended mind perspective on natural number
representation. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 475–490.
De Cruz, H. (2009a). An enhanced argument for innate elemen-
tary geometric knowledge and its philosophical implications. In
B. Van Kerkhove (Ed.), New perspectives on mathematical prac-
tices. Essays in philosophy and history of mathematics (pp. 185–
206). New Jersey: World Scientific.
De Cruz, H. (2009b). Is linguistic determinism an empirically testable
hypothesis? Logique et Analyse, 208, 327–341.
De Cruz, H., Boudry, M., De Smedt, J., & Blancke, S. (in press). Evolu-
tionary approaches to epistemic justification. Dialectica.
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2007). The role of intuitive ontologies in
scientific understanding—The case of human evolution. Biology &
Philosophy, 22, 351–368.
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2010a). The innateness hypothesis and
mathematical concepts. Topoi, 29, 3–13.
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2010b). Paley’s iPod: The cognitive basis
of the design argument within natural theology. Zygon: Journal of
Religion and Science, 45, 665–684.
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2010c). Science as structured imagination.
Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 29–44.
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (in press a). Evolved cognitive biases and
the epistemic status of scientific beliefs. Philosophical Studies.

11. Bibliography 277
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (in press b). Mathematical symbols as
epistemic actions. Synthese.
De Cruz, H., Neth, H., & Schlimm, D. (2010). The cognitive basis of
arithmetic. In B. L¨we & T. M¨ller (Eds.), PhiMSAMP. Philosophy
o u
of mathematics: Sociological aspects and mathematical practice (pp.
59–106). London: College Publications.
Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Dehaene, S. (2003). The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: A loga-
rithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 145–
147.
Dehaene, S. (2005). Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and
arithmetic: The “neuronal recycling” hypothesis. In S. Dehaene,
J. Duhamel, M. D. Hauser, & G. Rizzolatti (Eds.), From monkey
brain to human brain (pp. 133–157). Cambridge, MA & London:
MIT Press.
Dehaene, S.(2009). Origins of mathematical intuitions. The case of arith-
metic. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 232–259.
Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E., & Pica, P. (2008). Log or linear?
Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian
indigene cultures. Science, 320, 1217–1220.
Dehaene, S., Spelke, E. S., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999).
Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging
evidence. Science, 284, 970–974.
Delagnes, A., & Roche, H.(2005). Late Pliocene hominid knapping skills:
The case of Lokalalei 2C, West Turkana, Kenya. Journal of Human
Evolution, 48, 435–472.
DeLoache, J. S. (2004). Becoming symbol-minded. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 8, 66–70.
de Maillet, B.(1748). Telliamed ou entretiens d’un philosophe indien avec
un missionnaire fran¸ois sur la diminution de la mer, la formation
c
de la terre, l’origine de l’homme, & c. Amsterdam: Honor´ & Fils.
e
De Morgan, A. (1830). On the study and di culties of mathematics.
London: Paul Kegan.
Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. London: Penguin.
Dennett, D. C.(1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. Evolution and the mean-
ings of life. London: Allen Lane.
Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell. Religion as a natural phe-

12. 278 Bibliography
nomenon. Oxford: Allen Lane.
De Regt, H. W., & Dieks, D. (2005). A contextual approach to scientific
understanding. Synthese, 144, 137–170.
d’Errico, F. (1995). A new model and its implications for the origin of
writing: The La Marche antler revisited. Cambridge Archaeological
Journal, 5, 163–206.
d’Errico, F. (1998). Palaeolithic origins of artificial memory systems:
An evolutionary perspective. In C. Renfrew & C. Scarre (Eds.),
Cognition and material culture: The archaeology of symbolic storage
(pp. 19–50). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological
Research.
Descartes, R. (1637 [1988]). Le discours de la m´thode, la dioptrique, les
e
m´t´ores et la g´om´trie. In F. Alqui´ (Ed.), Œuvres philosophiques
ee e e e
de Descartes (pp. 549–761). Paris: Classiques Garnier.
De Smedt, J. (2011). Common minds, uncommon thoughts. A philosoph-
ical anthropological investigation of uniquely human creative behav-
ior, with an emphasis on artistic ability, religious reflection, and
scientific study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ghent University.
De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2010). Toward an integrative approach of
cognitive neuroscientific and evolutionary psychological studies of
art. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 695–719.
De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2011a). The cognitive appeal of the cos-
mological argument. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion,
23, 103-122.
De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2011b). The role of material culture in
human time representation: Calendrical systems as extensions of
mental time travel. Adaptive Behavior, 19, 63–76.
De Smedt, J., De Cruz, H., & Braeckman, J. (2009). Why the human
brain is not an enlarged chimpanzee brain. In H. Høgh-Olesen,
J. Tønnesvang, & P. Bertelsen (Eds.), Human characteristics. Evo-
lutionary perspectives on human mind and kind (pp. 168–181). New-
castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Devitt, M. (1996). Coming to our senses. A naturalistic program for
semantic localism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Waal, F. B. M. (1999). Cultural primatology comes of age. Nature,
399, 635–636.
d’Halloy, J.-J. d’Omalius.(1846). Note sur la succession des ˆtres vivants.
e
Bulletins de l’acad´mie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-
e

13. Bibliography 279
arts de Belgique, 13, 581–591.
Diamond, J. (1992). The rise and fall of the third chimpanzee. How our
animal heritage a↵ects the way we live. London: Vintage.
Diamond, J., & Bishop, K. D.(1999). Ethno-ornithology of the Ketengban
people, Indonesian New Guinea. In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.),
Folkbiology (pp. 17–45). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall
(Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Dobzhansky, T. (1944). On species and races of living and fossil man.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2, 251–265.
Donald, M.(1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evo-
lution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Douven, I., & van Brakel, J. (1995). Is scientific realism an empirical
hypothesis? Dialectica, 49, 3–14.
Downes, S. M. (1993). Naturalized philosophy of science. Philosophy of
Science, 60, 452–468.
Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and con-
ceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. S. Smith, & J. Vaid
(Eds.), Creative thought. An investigation of conceptual structures
and processes (pp. 461–493). Washington D.C.: American Psycho-
logical Association.
Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to
cognition: The case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5,
334–339.
Dunbar, K., & Fugelsang, J.(2005). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In
K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook
of thinking and reasoning (pp. 705–725). New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Dunbar, R. I. M., & Barrett, L. (Eds.). (2007). Oxford handbook of
evolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dupr´, J. (1999). Are whales fish? In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.),
e
Folkbiology (pp. 461–476). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
Eddington, A. (1928). The nature of the physical world. Retrieved
April 3, 2011, from http://www.giffordlectures.org/Browse
.asp?PubID=TPNOPW&Volume=0&Issue=0&ArticleID=2.
Eger, E., Sterzer, P., Russ, M. O., Giraud, A.-L., & Kleinschmidt, A.

14. 280 Bibliography
(2003). A supramodal number representation in human intrapari-
etal cortex. Neuron, 37, 1–20.
Ekert, A. (2008). Complex and unpredictable Cardano. International
Journal of Theoretical Physics, 47, 2101–2119.
Elga, A. (2007). Reflection and disagreement. Noˆs, 41, 478–502.
u
Elqayam, S., & Evans, J. B.(in press). Subtracting ‘ought’ from ‘is’: De-
scriptivism versus normativism in the study of the human thinking.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Ericsson, K., Krampe, R., & Tesch-R¨mer, C.(1993). The role of deliber-
o
ate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological
review, 100, 363–406.
Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics.
Albany: State University of New York Press.
Evans, E. M. (2000). Beyond Scopes. Why creationism is here to stay.
In K. Rosengren, C. Johnson, & P. Harris (Eds.), Imaging the im-
possible: Magical, scientific and religious thinking in children (pp.
305–331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Everett, D. L. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in
Pirah˜. Current Anthropology, 46, 621–634.
a
Fabre-Thorpe, M., Richard, G., & Thorpe, S. J. (1998). Rapid cate-
gorization of natural images by rhesus monkeys. NeuroReport, 9,
303–308.
Fales, E. (1996). Plantinga’s case against naturalistic epistemology. Phi-
losophy of Science, 63, 432–451.
Farah, M. J., & Rabinowitz, C. (2003). Genetic and environmental in-
fluences on the organization of semantic memory in the brain: Is
“living things” an innate category? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20,
401–408.
Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Eye con-
tact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 9602–
9605.
Farroni, T., Johnson, M. H., Menon, E., Zulian, L., Faraguna, D., &
Csibra, G. (2005). Newborns’ preference for face-relevant stimuli:
E↵ects of contrast polarity. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 17245–17250.
Fehr, E., & G¨chter, S.(2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature,
a
415, 137–140.

15. Bibliography 281
Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M. D. (2002). The representations
underlying infants’ choice of more: Object files versus analog mag-
nitudes. Psychological Science, 13, 150–156.
Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Core systems of
number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314.
Feist, G. J. (2006). The psychology of science and the origins of the
scientific mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Feldman, R. (2007). Reasonable religious disagreements. In L. Anthony
(Ed.), Philosophers without gods (pp. 194–214). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
F´ron, J., Gentaz, E., & Streri, A.(2006). Evidence of amodal representa-
e
tion of small numbers across visuo-tactile modalities in 5-month-old
infants. Cognitive Development, 21, 81–92.
Fischer, M. H. (2003). Cognitive representation of negative numbers.
Psychological Science, 14, 278–282.
Flombaum, J. I., Junge, J. A., & Hauser, M. D. (2005). Rhesus monkeys
(Macaca mulatta) spontaneously compute addition operations over
large numbers. Cognition, 97, 315–325.
Flombaum, J. I., & Santos, L. R. (2005). Rhesus monkeys attribute
perceptions to others. Current Biology, 15, 447–452.
Focquaert, F., Braeckman, J., & Platek, S. M. (2008). An evolution-
ary cognitive neuroscience perspective on human self-awareness and
theory of mind. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 47–68.
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.
Fodor, J. A. (1981). Representations: Philosophical essays on the foun-
dations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A.(1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. (2000). The mind doesn’t work that way. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Foley, R.(1987). Another unique species: Patterns in human evolutionary
ecology. Harlow: Longman.
Foley, R.(2001). In the shadow of the modern synthesis? Alternative per-
spectives on the last fifty years of paleoanthropology. Evolutionary
Anthropology, 10, 5–14.
Forrest, B. (2000). Methodological naturalism and philosophical natural-
ism: Clarifying the connection. Philo, 3, 7–29.
Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Num-
ber as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirah˜ language and
a

16. 282 Bibliography
cognition. Cognition, 108, 819–824.
Frank, M. C., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E.(2008). Language as a cognitive
technology: English-speakers match like Pirah˜ when you don’t let
a
them count. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.),
Proceedings of the XXX annual conference of the Cognitive Science
Society (pp. 439–444). Austin, Texas: Cognitive Science Society.
Frankenhuis, W. E., & Ploeger, A.(2007). Evolutionary psychology versus
Fodor: Arguments for and against the massive modularity hypoth-
esis. Philosophical Psychology, 20, 687–710.
Fricker, E. (2002). Trusting others in the sciences: A priori or empirical
warrant? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 373–
383.
Friedman, M. (1997). Philosophical naturalism. Proceedings and Ad-
dresses of the American Philosophical Association, 71, 7–21.
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (1999). Interacting minds—A biological basis.
Science, 286, 1692–1695.
Gabunia, L., Vekua, A., Lordkipanidze, D., Swisher III, C. C., Ferring, R.,
Justus, A., Nioradze, M., Tvalchrelidze, M., Ant´n, S. C., Bosinski,
o
G., J¨ris, O., de Lumley, M.-A., Majsuradze, G., & Moukhelishvili,
o
A. (2000). Earliest Pleistocene hominid cranial remains of Georgia:
Taxonomy, geological setting, and age. Science, 288, 1019–1025.
Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Gallistel, C. R.(1995). The replacement of general-purpose theories with
adaptive specializations. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neu-
rosciences (pp. 1255–1267). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition:
From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 59–65.
Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G.(2003). Brain structures di↵er between musicians
and non-musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9240–9245.
Geary, D. C.(1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cog-
nition. Implications for mathematical development and instruction.
American Psychologist, 50, 24–37.
Geary, D. C. (2002). Principles of evolutionary educational psychology.
Learning and Individual Di↵erences, 12, 317–345.
Geary, D. C. (2007a). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual founda-
tions for an evolutionary educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson
& J. R. Levin (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind. Psychological

17. Bibliography 283
perspectives on contemporary educational issues (Vol. 2, pp. 1–99).
Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Geary, D. C. (2007b). An evolutionary perspective on learning disability
in mathematics. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32, 471–519.
Geary, D. C., Bow-Thomas, C. C., Liu, F., & Siegler, R. S. (1996). De-
velopment of arithmetical competencies in Chinese and American
children: Influence of age, language, and schooling. Child Develop-
ment, 67, 2022–2044.
Geist, C., L¨we, B., & Van Kerkhove, B. (2010). Peer review and knowl-
o
edge by testimony in mathematics. In B. L¨we & T. M¨ller (Eds.),
o u
PhiMSAMP. Philosophy of mathematics: Sociological aspects and
mathematical practice (pp. 155–178). London: College Publica-
tions.
Gelman, S. A. (2004). Psychological essentialism in children. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 8, 404–409.
Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. (1990). The importance of knowing a dodo is
a bird: Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Develop-
mental Psychology, 26, 796–804.
Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early
understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38, 213–244.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for
analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R. W., Markman, A. B., Levidow,
B. B., Wol↵, P., & Forbus, K. D. (1997). Analogical reasoning and
conceptual change: A case-study of Johannes Kepler. Journal of
the Learning Sciences, 6, 3–40.
Gentner, T. Q., Fenn, K. M., Margoliash, D., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2006).
Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature, 440,
1204–1207.
Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Kir´ly, I. (2002). Rational imitation in
a
preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755.
Gerstmann, J. (1940). Syndrome of finger agnosia: Disorientation for
right and left, agraphia and acalculia. Archives of Neurology and
Psychiatry, 44, 398–408.
Gettier, E. L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23,
121–123.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical
transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.

18. 284 Bibliography
Giere, R. N. (2004). The problem of agency in scientific distributed cog-
nitive systems. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 759–774.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal
way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103,
650–669.
Gigerenzer, G., & Ho↵rage, U.(1999). Overcoming di culties in Bayesian
reasoning: A reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers and
McGraw (1999). Psychological Review, 2, 425–430.
Gilad, Y., Wiebe, V., Przeworski, M., Lancet, D., & P¨¨bo, S. (2004).
aa
Loss of olfactory receptor genes coincides with the acquisition of full
trichromatic vision in primates. PLoS Biology, 2, 120–125.
Gilmore, C. K., McCarthy, S. E., & Spelke, E. S. (2007). Symbolic arith-
metic knowledge without instruction. Nature, 447, 589–591.
Gil-White, F. J.(2001). Are ethnic groups biological “species” to the hu-
man brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories.
Current Anthropology, 42, 515–536.
Glass, B. (1979). Milestones and rates of growth in the development of
biology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 54, 31–53.
Godfrey-Smith, P.(1991). Signal, decision, action. Journal of Philosophy,
88, 709–722.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W., & Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturing
gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20,
267–272.
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Wagner, S. M. (2005). How our hands help us
learn. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 234–241.
Goldman, A. I. (1990). Natural selection, justification, and inference to
the best explanation. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Evolution, cognition and
realism. Studies in evolutionary epistemology (pp. 39–46). Lanham:
University Press of America.
Goldman, A. I. (1999). A priori warrant and naturalistic epistemology.
In J. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 13, Epistemology
(pp. 1–28). Oxford: Blackwell.
Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds. The philosophy, psychology,
and neuroscience of mindreading. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Goodman, N. D. (1981). The experiential foundations of mathematical
knowledge. History and Philosophy of Logic, 2, 55–65.
Gopnik, A. (1996). The scientist as child. Philosophy of Science, 63,

19. Bibliography 285
485–514.
Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., Kushnir, T., &
Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal
maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111, 3–32.
Gopnik, A., & Meltzo↵, A. (1997). Words, thoughts and theories. Cam-
bridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gopnik, A., & Schulz, L.(2004). Mechanisms of theory formation in young
children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 371–377.
Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from
Amazonia. Science, 306, 496–499.
Gottfried, G., Gelman, S. A., & Schultz, J. (1999). Children’s under-
standing of the brain: From early essentialism to biological theory.
Cognitive Development, 14, 147–174.
Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge,
MA & London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Grabiner, J. V.(1986). Is mathematical truth time-dependent? In T. Ty-
moczko (Ed.), New directions in the philosophy of mathematics (pp.
201–213). Boston: Birkh¨user.
a
Greenblatt, S. H. (1995). Phrenology in the science and culture of the
19th century. Neurosurgery, 37, 790–805.
Greer, B.(2004). The growth of mathematics through conceptual restruc-
turing. Learning and Instruction, 14, 541–548.
Gregory, A. (2001). Harvey, Aristotle and the weather cycle. Studies
in History and Philosophy of Biology & Biomedical Sciences, 32,
153–168.
Grei↵enhagen, C., & Sharrock, W. (2006). Mathematical relativism:
Logic, grammar and arithmetic in cultural comparison. Journal
for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36, 97–117.
Grei↵enhagen, C., & Sherman, W. (2008). Kuhn and conceptual change:
On the analogy between conceptual changes in science and children.
Science & Education, 17, 1–26.
Gu, J., & Gu, X. (2003). Induced gene expression in human brain after
the split from chimpanzee. Trends in Genetics, 19, 63–65.
Guthrie, S. E.(1993). Faces in the clouds. A new theory of religion. New
York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gutting, G. (2009). What philosophers know: Case studies in recent
analytic philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haile-Selassie, Y., Suwa, G., & White, T. D. (2004). Late Miocene teeth

20. 286 Bibliography
from Middle Awash, Ethiopia, and early hominid dental evolution.
Science, 303, 1503–1505.
Haith, M. M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is rich
interpretation too costly? Infant Behavior and Development, 21,
167–179.
Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual dif-
ferences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achieve-
ment. Nature, 455, 665–668.
Hare, B., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2001). Do chimpanzees know what
conspecifics know? Animal Behaviour, 61, 139–151.
Harper, E. (1987). Ghosts of Diophantus. Educational Studies in Mathe-
matics, 18, 75–90.
Harris, J. (1982). Facts and fallacies of Aboriginal number systems. In
S. Hargrave (Ed.), Language and culture (pp. 153–181). Darwin:
Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Harris, P. L. (2002). Checking our sources: The origins of trust in testi-
mony. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 315–333.
Harris, P. L., Pasquini, E. S., Duke, S., Asscher, J. J., & Pons, F. (2006).
Germs and angels: The role of testimony in young children’s ontol-
ogy. Developmental Science, 9, 76–96.
Hart, R. (2010). The Chinese roots of linear algebra. Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University Press.
Harvey, W. (1628 [1847]). An anatomical disquisition on the motion of
the heart and blood in animals. In R. Willis (Trans.), The works of
Willam Harvey, M.D. Physician to the king, professor of anatomy
and surgery to the college of physicians. Translated from the Latin
with a life of the author (pp. 1–86). London: Sydenham Society.
Hassin, R. R., Bargh, J. A., & Uleman, J. S. (2002). Spontaneous causal
inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 515–522.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W.(2002). The faculty of language:
What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–
1579.
Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L.(2010). The grand design. London: Bantam.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
Held, R., Ostrovsky, Y., de Gelder, B., Gandhi, T., Ganesh, S., Mathur,
U., & Sinha, P. (2011). The newly sighted fail to match seen with
felt. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 551–553.
Henrich, J. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive

21. Bibliography 287
cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses—The Tasmanian
case. American Antiquity, 69, 197–211.
Henrich, J., & Boyd, R.(2002). On modeling cognition and culture. Why
cultural evolution does not require replication of representations.
Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 87–112.
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McEl-
reath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Smith Henrich, N.,
Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F. W., Patton, J. Q.,
& Tracer, D.(2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective:
Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and
Brain Sciences, 28, 795–815.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people
in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 61–83.
Herbert, S. (2005). The Darwinian revolution revisited. Journal of the
History of Biology, 38, 51–66.
Hespos, S. J. (2007). Language acquisition: When does the learning
begin? Current Biology, 17, 628–630.
Hoddeson, L.(2007). Analogy and cognitive style in the history of inven-
tion: Inventor independence and closeness of compared domains. In
S. Vosniadou, D. Kayser, & A. Protopapas (Eds.), Proceedings of
the European cognitive science conference (pp. 413–417). Mahwah:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Horner, V., & Whiten, A. (2005). Causal knowledge and imita-
tion/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and chil-
dren (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8, 164–181.
Hull, D. L.(1964). The e↵ect of essentialism on taxonomy—Two thousand
years of stasis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15,
314–326.
Hume, D. (1739 [2001]). A treatise of human nature (D. F. Norton &
M. J. Norton, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, D.(1779). Dialogues concerning natural religion. London: Hafner.
Hunt, G. R., & Gray, R. D.(2003). Diversification and cumulative evolu-
tion in New Caledonian crow tool manufacture. Proceedings of the
Royal Society of London B, 270, 867–874.
Hurley, S. (2003). Animal action in the space of reasons. Mind & Lan-
guage, 18, 231–257.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutto, D. D.(2011). Presumptuous naturalism: A cautionary tale. Amer-

22. 288 Bibliography
ican Philosophical Quarterly, 48, 129–145.
Huxley, T. H. (1863). Evidences as to man’s place in nature. London:
Williams and Norgate.
Ifrah, G. (1985). Les chi↵res, ou l’histoire d’une grande invention. Paris:
La↵ont.
Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2004). Vitalistic causality in young children’s
naive biology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 356–362.
Ingman, M., Kaessmann, H., P¨¨bo, S., & Gyllensten, U. (2000). Mi-
aa
tochondrial genome variation and the origin of modern humans.
Nature, 408, 708–713.
Irving, E.(2005). The role of latitude in mobilism debates. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
102, 1821–1828.
Itakura, S.(2004). Gaze-following and joint visual attention in nonhuman
animals. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 216–226.
Izard, V., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Dehaene, S.(2008). Distinct cerebral
pathways for object identity and number in human infants. PLoS
Biology, 6, e11.
Izard, V., Pica, P., Spelke, E. S., & Dehaene, S.(2011). Flexible intuitions
of Euclidean geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Proceed-
ings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 108, 9782–9787.
Jackson, D. E., Holcombe, M., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2004). Trail geom-
etry gives polarity to ant foraging networks. Nature, 432, 907–909.
Jacob, F. (1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science, 196, 1161–1166.
Jacobs, R. A., Jordan, M. I., & Barto, A. G. (1991). Task decomposition
through competition in a modular connectionist architecture: The
what and where vision tasks. Cognitive Science, 15, 219–250.
Janik, V. M., Sayigh, L. S., & Wells, R. S.(2006). Signature whistle shape
conveys identity information to bottlenose dolphins. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
103, 8293–8297.
Jansson, D. G., Condoor, S. S., & Brock, H. R. (1993). Cognition in
design: Viewing the hidden side of the design process. Environment
and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, 257–271.
Jordan, K. E., & Brannon, E. M. (2006). The multisensory representa-
tion of number in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 3486–3489.

23. Bibliography 289
Jordan, K. E., Brannon, E. M., Logothetis, N. K., & Ghazanfar, A. A.
(2005). Monkeys match the number of voices they hear to the num-
ber of faces they see. Current Biology, 15, 1–5.
Joseph, G. G. (2000). The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots of
mathematics (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kahane, G. (2011). Evolutionary debunking arguments. Noˆs, 45, 103–
u
125.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncer-
tainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.(1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions.
Psychological Review, 103, 582–591.
Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Chimpanzees know what
others know, but not what they believe. Cognition, 109, 224–234.
Kant, I.(1781 [2005]). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood,
Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M.(1997). The fusiform face
area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face
perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams. Small
Business Reports, 18, 68–71.
Kaufmann, E. (2010). Shall the religious inherit the Earth? Demography
and politics in the twenty-first century. London: Profile Books.
Keil, F. C.(1989). Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Keil, F. C. (2003). Folkscience: Coarse interpretations of a complex real-
ity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 368–373.
Kelemen, D.(2003). British and American children’s preferences for teleo-
functional explanations of the natural world. Cognition, 88, 201–
221.
Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about
purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295–301.
Kelemen, D., Callanan, M. A., Casler, K., & P´rez-Granados, D. R.
e
(2005). Why things happen: Teleological explanation in parent-
child conversations. Developmental Psychology, 41, 251–264.
Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction:
Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111, 138–143.
Kelemen, D., Widdowson, D., Posner, T., Brown, A., & Casler, K.(2003).

24. 290 Bibliography
Teleo-functional constraints on preschool children’s reasoning about
living things. Developmental Science, 6, 329–345.
Kert´sz, A. (2004). Cognitive semantics and scientific knowledge: Case
e
studies in the cognitive science of science. Amsterdam: John Ben-
jamins.
Khan, I. A., Daya, S. K., & Gowda, R. M.(2005). Evolution of the theory
of circulation. International Journal of Cardiology, 98, 519–521.
Kilian, A., Yaman, S., von Fersen, L., & G¨nt¨rk¨n, O. (2003). A bot-
u u u
tlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli di↵ering in numerosity.
Learning and Behavior, 31, 133–142.
Kim, J. (1988). What is “naturalized epistemology?”. Philosophical Per-
spectives, 2, 381–405.
King, M.-C., & Wilson, A. C. (1975). Evolution at two levels in humans
and chimpanzees. Science, 188, 107–116.
Kirsh, D. (1995). Complementary strategies: Why we use our hands
when we think. In J. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of
the XVII annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.
212–217). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kirsh, D. (1996). Adapting the environment instead of oneself. Adaptive
Behavior, 4, 415–452.
Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from prag-
matic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.
Kitcher, P.(1990). The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy,
87, 5–22.
Kitcher, P. (1992). The naturalists return. Philosophical Review, 101,
53–114.
Kitcher, P.(2008). Science, religion, and democracy. Episteme: A Journal
of Social Epistemology, 5, 5–18.
Kobayashi, T., Hiraki, K., Mugitani, R., & Hasegawa, T. (2004). Baby
arithmetic: One object plus one tone. Cognition, 91, B23–B34.
Koechlin, E., Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J.(1998). Numerical transformations
in five-month-old human infants. Mathematical Cognition, 3, 89–
104.
Kornblith, H.(1994). Naturalism: Both metaphysical and epistemological.
In P. French, T. E. Uehling, & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Midwest
studies in philosophy, volume XIX, Philosophical naturalism (pp.
39–52). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Koten Jr., J. W., Wood, G., Hagoort, P., Goebel, R., Propping, P.,

25. Bibliography 291
Willmes, K., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). Genetic contribution to
variation in cognitive function: An fMRI study in twins. Science,
323, 1737–1740.
a ´
Kov´cs, A. M., T´gl´s, E., & Endress, A. D.(2010). The social sense: Sus-
e a
ceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science,
330, 1830–1834.
Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M.(2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuris-
tics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about
motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 439–453.
Krieger, M. H.(1991). Theorems as meaningful cultural artifacts: Making
the world additive. Synthese, 144, 135–154.
Kuhlmeier, V., Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (2004). Do 5-month-old infants
see humans as material objects? Cognition, 94, 95–103.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago:
Chicago University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation
in scientific research. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension:
Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (pp. 225–239).
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kummer, H. (1995). Causal knowledge in animals. In D. Sperber,
D. Premack, & A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. A multidisci-
plinary debate (pp. 26–36). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ladyman, J.(2007). Does physics answer metaphysical questions? Royal
Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 61, 179–202.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes.
Philosophical papers (J. Worrall & G. Currie, Eds.). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Lako↵, G., & N´nez, R. E.(2000). Where mathematics comes from. How
u˜
the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic
Books.
Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R.(2006). Niche construction, human behav-
ior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology,
15, 95–104.
Lamarck, J.-B. (1809). Philosophie zoologique, ou exposition des con-
sid´rations relatives ` l’histoire naturelle des animaux. Retrieved
e a
August 20, 2009, from http://www.lamarck.cnrs.fr/ice/
ice book detail.php?lang=fr&type=text&bdd=lamarck&table=
ouvrages lamarck&bookId=29&typeofbookId=1&num=0.

26. 292 Bibliography
Laudan, L. (1981). A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of
Science, 48, 19–49.
Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C., Silver, J. S., & Boh, L.(2006). Groups per-
form better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers prob-
lems: E↵ects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-
chology, 90, 644–651.
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2005). Number and natural language. In
P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind.
Structure and contents (pp. 216–235). Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2007). Linguistic determinism and the
innate basis of number. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich
(Eds.), The innate mind. Foundations and the future (pp. 139–170).
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leakey, M. G., Spoor, F., Brown, F. H., Gathogo, P. N., Kiarie, C.,
Leakey, L. N., & McDougall, I. (2001). New hominin genus from
eastern Africa shows diverse Middle Pliocene lineages. Nature, 410,
433–440.
Leakey, R. E. F., & Walker, A. C.(1976). Australopithecus , Homo erectus,
and the single species hypothesis. Nature, 261, 572–574.
Le Clec’H, G., Dehaene, S., Cohen, C., Mehler, J., Dupoux, E., Poline,
J. B., Lehricy, S., van de Moortele, P. F., & Le Bihan, D. (2000).
Distinct cortical areas for names of numbers and body parts inde-
pendent of language and input modality. NeuroImage, 12, 381–391.
Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more:
An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting
principles. Cognition, 105, 395–438.
Leibniz, G. W. (1765 [2001]). New essays on human understanding
(P. Remnant & J. F. Bennett, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-
versity Press.
Lemer, C., Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., & Cohen, L. (2003). Approximate
quantities and exact number words: Dissociable systems. Neuropsy-
chologia, 41, 1942–1958.
Leslie, A. M.(1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “Theory
of Mind”. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.
Leslie, A. M., Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. (2008). The generative basis
of natural number concepts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 213–
218.

27. Bibliography 293
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2003). Does morality have a
biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral
sentiments relating to incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of
London B, 270, 819–826.
Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). Origins of number sense: Large-
number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 14,
396–401.
Lipton, P. (1991). Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.
Lipton, P. (2004). What good is an explanation? In J. Cornwell (Ed.),
Explanations. Styles of explanation in science (pp. 1–21). Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Liu, X., & MacIsaac, D. (2005). An investigation of factors a↵ecting
the degree of na¨ impetus theory application. Journal of Science
ıve
Education and Technology, 14, 101–116.
Lloyd, G. E. R.(2007). Cognitive variations: Reflections on the unity and
diversity of the human mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lockard, R. B. (1971). Reflections on the fall of comparative psychology:
Is there a message for us all? American Psychologist, 26, 168–179.
Locke, J. (1689). An essay concerning human understanding. Retrieved
September 20, 2007, from http://etext.library.adelaide.edu
.au/l/locke/john/l81u/index.html.
Loftus, E. (2003). Make-believe memories. American Psychologist, 58,
867–873.
Lombard, M., & Phillipson, L. (2010). Indications of bow and stone-
tipped arrow use 64000 years ago in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Antiquity, 84, 635–648.
Lombrozo, T. (2007). Simplicity and probability in causal explanation.
Cognitive Psychology, 55, 232–257.
Lombrozo, T., Kelemen, D., & Zaitchik, D. (2007). Inferring design:
Evidence of a preference for teleological explanations in patients
with Alzheimer’s disease. Psychological Science, 18, 999–1006.
Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M. (2008). The importance of
understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolu-
tion: Education and Outreach, 1, 290–298.
Lutz, D. J., & Keil, F. C. (2002). Early understanding of the division of
cognitive labor. Child Development, 73, 1073–1084.
Machery, E.(2006). Two dogmas of neo-empiricism. Philosophy Compass,
1, 398–412.

28. 294 Bibliography
Maddy, P.(1997). Naturalism in mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mahon, B. Z., Anzellotti, S., Schwarzbach, J., Zampini, M., & Caramazza,
A. (2009). Category-specific organization in the human brain does
not require visual experience. Neuron, 63, 397–405.
Malthus, T. R. (1826). An essay on the principle of population or a view
of its past and present e↵ects on human happiness; with an inquiry
into our prospects respecting the future removal or mitigation of the
evils which it occasions (6th ed.). London: John Murray.
Mameli, M., & Bateson, P. (2006). Innateness and the sciences. Biology
& Philosophy, 21, 155–188.
Marcus, G. F.(2004). The birth of the mind. How a tiny number of genes
creates the complexities of human thought. New York: Basic Books.
Margolis, E., & Laurence, S.(2007). The ontology of concepts—Abstract
objects or mental representations? Noˆs, 41, 561–593.
u
Marks, J. (2003). What it means to be 98% chimpanzee. Apes, people,
and their genes. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California
Press.
Marr, D. C.(1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human
representational system and processing of visual information. San
Francisco: Freeman.
Marshall-Pescini, S., & Whiten, A.(2008). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
and the question of cumulative culture: An experimental approach.
Animal Cognition, 11, 449–456.
Martin, A., & Weisberg, J. (2003). Neural foundations for understand-
ing social and mechanical concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20,
575–587.
Mart´
ın-Loeches, M., Casado, P., Gonzalo, R., de Heras, L., & Fern´ndez-
a
Fr´ C.(2006). Brain potentials to mathematical syntax problems.
ıas,
Psychophysiology, 43, 579–591.
Martzlo↵, J. C.(1995). Review of Lam Lay Yong and Ang Tian Se (1992)
Fleeting footsteps: Tracing the conception of arithmetic and algebra
in ancient China. Historia Mathematica, 22, 67–87.
Masataka, N., Ohnishi, T., Imabayashi, E., Hirakata, M., & Matsuda,
H. (2007). Neural correlates for learning to read roman numerals.
Brain and Language, 100, 276–282.
Massey, C. M., & Gelman, R. (1988). Preschooler’s ability to decide
whether a photographed unfamiliar object can move itself. Devel-
opmental psychology, 24, 307–317.

29. Bibliography 295
Matsuzawa, T.(2007). Comparative cognitive development. Developmen-
tal Science, 10, 97–103.
Matthew, P. (1831). On naval timber and arboriculture; with critical
notes on authors who have recently treated the subject of planting.
Edinburgh: Adam Black.
Mattusch, C. C.(2003). Corinthian bronze: Famous, but elusive. Corinth,
20, 219–232.
Mayr, E. (1950). Taxonomic categories in fossil hominids. Cold Spring
Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 15, 109–117.
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Mayr, E.(1987). The ontological status of species: Scientific progress and
philosophical terminology. Biology & Philosophy, 2, 145–166.
McCauley, R. N.(2000). The naturalness of religion and the unnaturalness
of science. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and
cognition (pp. 61–85). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McCauley, R. N. (in press). Why religion is natural and science is not.
New York: Oxford University Press.
McCauley, R. N., & Henrich, J. (2006). Susceptibility to the M¨ller-Lyer
u
illusion, theory-neutral observation, and the diachronic penetrabil-
ity of the visual input system. Philosophical Psychology, 19, 79–101.
McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 249, 122–
130.
McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., & Green, B. (1980). Curvilinear motion
in the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about the motion of
objects. Science, 210, 1139–1141.
McCloskey, M., Washburn, A., & Felch, L. (1983). Intuitive physics:
The straight-down belief and its origin. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 636–649.
McComb, K., Packer, C., & Pusey, A. E. (1994). Roaring and numerical
assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo.
Animal Behaviour, 47, 379–387.
McCrink, K., & Wynn, K.(2004). Large-number addition and subtraction
by 9-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 15, 776–781.
McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer-
sity Press.
McKay, R. T., & Dennett, D. C. (2009). The evolution of misbelief.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 493–510.

30. 296 Bibliography
McRoberts, R. W. (1990). Counting at Pularumpi: A survey of a tradi-
tional mathematics and its implications for modern learning. Abo-
riginal Child at School, 18, 19–43.
Meck, W. H., & Church, R. M.(1983). A mode control model of counting
and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal
Behavior Processes, 9, 320–334.
Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (Eds.). (1999). Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A.(1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vos-
niadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp.
179–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meltzo↵, A. N. (1988). Infant imitation after a 1-week delay: Long-
term memory for novel acts and multiple stimuli. Developmental
Psychology, 24, 470–476.
Meltzo↵, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual
gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.
Menary, R. (2006). Attacking the bounds of cognition. Philosophical
Psychology, 19, 329–344.
Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Attacking the bounds of cogni-
tion. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Mercader, J., Barton, H., Gillespie, J., Harris, J., Kuhn, S., Tyler, R., &
Boesch, C. (2007). 4,300-Year-old chimpanzee sites and the origins
of percussive stone technology. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 3043–3048.
Mercier, H. (2010). The social origins of folk epistemology. Review of
Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 499–514.
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments
for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34,
57–74.
Mikkelsen, T. S., Hillier, L. W., Eichler, E. E., Zody, M. C., Ja↵e, D. B.,
Yang, S., Enard, W., Hellmann, I., Lindblad-Toh, K., Altheide,
T. K., Archidiacono, N., Bork, P., Butler, J., Chang, J. L., Cheng,
Z., Chinwalla, A. T., & deJong, P. (2005). Initial sequence of the
chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Na-
ture, 473, 69–87.
Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind. How sexual choice shaped the evolu-
tion of human nature. London: William Heineman.
Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of

31. Bibliography 297
evolution. Science, 313, 765–766.
Miller, R., Owens, S. J., & Rørslett, B.(2011). Plants and colour: Flowers
and pollination. Optics and Laser Technology, 43, 282–294.
Millikan, R. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories.
Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Millikan, R.(1998). A common structure for concepts of individuals, stu↵s
and real kinds: More mama, more milk and more mouse. Behavioral
and Brain Sciences, 21, 55–65.
Millman, A. B., & Smith, C. L. (1997). Darwin’s use of analogical rea-
soning in theory construction. Metaphor and Symbol, 12, 159–187.
Mills, C. M., & Keil, F. C.(2005). The development of cynicism. Psycho-
logical Science, 16, 385–390.
Mithen, S. (1988). Looking and learning: Upper Palaeolithic art and
information gathering. World Archaeology, 19, 297–327.
Mithen, S.(1996). The prehistory of the mind: A search for the origins of
art, religion and science. Boston & New York: Houghton Mi✏in.
Mithen, S. (2000). Mind, brain and material culture: An archaeological
perspective. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution
and the human mind. Modularity, language and meta-cognition (pp.
207–217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Molko, N., Cachia, A., Rivi`re, D., Mangin, J.-F., Bruandet, M., Le Bi-
e
han, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S.(2004). Brain anatomy in Turner
syndrome: Evidence for impaired social and spatial–numerical net-
works. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 840–850.
Molko, N., Cachia, A., Rivi`re, D., Mangin, J.-F., Bruandet, M., Le Bi-
e
han, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S.(2003). Functional and structural
alterations of the intraparietal sulcus in a developmental dyscalculia
of genetic origin. Neuron, 40, 847–858.
Morewedge, C. K., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2005). The least
likely of times: How remembering the past biases forecasts of the
future. Psychological Science, 16, 626–630.
Morris, S. C., Taplin, J. E., & Gelman, S. (2000). Vitalism in naive
biological thinking. Developmental Psychology, 36, 582–595.
Moutier, S., & Houd´, O. (2003). Judgement under uncertainty and con-
e
junction fallacy inhibition training. Thinking and Reasoning, 9,
185–201.
Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K.(1967). Time required for judgements of
numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520.

32. 298 Bibliography
Muntersbjorn, M. M.(2003). Representational innovation and mathemat-
ical ontology. Synthese, 134, 159–180.
Murray, M.(2008). Four arguments that the cognitive psychology of reli-
gion undermines the justification of religious belief. In J. Bulbulia,
R. Sosis, E. Harris, R. Genet, C. Genet, & K. Wyman (Eds.), The
evolution of religion: Studies, theories, and critiques (pp. 393–398).
Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press.
Naets, J. (2010). How to define a number? A general epistemological
account of Simon Stevin’s art of defining. Topoi, 29, 77–86.
Nagel, J. (in press). Intuitions and experiments: A defense of the case
method in epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Re-
search.
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83,
435–450.
Negishi, H., Ueda, K., Kuriyama, M., Kato, M., Kawaguchi, H., & At-
sumori, H.(2005). Change of mental representation with the exper-
tise of mental abacus. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli
(Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVII annual conference of the Cognitive
Science Society (pp. 1606–1611). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nersessian, N. J.(1999). Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. In
L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based
reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 5–22). Malden & Oxford:
Blackwell.
Netz, R. (1999). Linguistic formulae as cognitive tools. Pragmatics and
Cognition, 7, 147–176.
Netz, R. (2002). Counter culture: Towards a history of Greek numeracy.
History of Science, 40, 321–352.
New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention
for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
104, 16598—16603.
Nichols, R. (2006). Why is the history of philosophy worth our study?
Metaphilosophy, 37, 34–52.
Nichols, S. (2002). On the genealogy of norms: A case for the role of
emotion in cultural evolution. Philosophy of Science, 69, 234–255.
Nieder, A., & Miller, E. K.(2003). Coding of cognitive magnitude: Com-
pressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal
cortex. Neuron, 37, 149–157.

33. Bibliography 299
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought. How Asians and west-
erners think di↵erently . . . and why. New York: Free Press.
Norenzayan, A., Atran, S., Faulkner, J., & Schaller, M. (2006). Memory
and mystery: The cultural selection of minimally counterintuitive
narratives. Cognitive Science, 30, 531–553.
Novell, J. R. (1990). From Da Vinci to Harvey: The development of
mechanical analogy from 1500 to 1650. Journal of the Royal Society
of Medicine, 83, 396–398.
Oaks, J. A. (2007). Medieval Arabic algebra as an artificial language.
Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35, 543–575.
O’Brien, M. J., & Lyman, R. L. (2000). Darwinian evolutionism is appli-
cable to historical archaeology. International Journal of Historical
Archaeology,, 4, 71–112.
Okasha, S. (2003). Fodor on cognition, modularity, and adaptationism.
Philosophy of Science, 70, 68–88.
Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Okasha, S. (2010). Altruism researchers must cooperate. Nature, 467,
653–655.
Oldham, M. C., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2006). Conservation
and evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chim-
panzee brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of
the United States of America, 103, 17973–17978.
Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants under-
stand false beliefs? Science, 308, 255–258.
Osawa, A., & Maeshima, S. (2009). Gerstmann’s syndrome in a patient
with left thalamic hemorrhage. Neurology Asia, 14, 161–164.
Owen, R.(1849). On the nature of limbs. A discourse. London: John Van
Voorst.
Papineau, D. (1993). Philosophical naturalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Papineau, D. (2000). The evolution of knowledge. In P. Carruthers &
A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind. Modularity,
language and meta-cognition (pp. 170–206). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Pascalis, O., & Bachevalier, J. (1998). Face recognition in primates: A
cross-species study. Behavioural Processes, 43, 87–96.
Pelletier, F. J., Elio, R., & Hanson, P. (2008). Is logic all in our heads?
From naturalism to psychologism. Studia Logica, 88, 3–66.

34. 300 Bibliography
Petersson, K. M., Silva, C., Castro-Caldas, A., Ingvar, M., & Reis, A.
(2007). Literacy: A cultural influence on functional left-right dif-
ferences in the inferior parietal cortex. European Journal of Neuro-
science, 26, 791–799.
Pfungst, O.(1911 [2001]). Clever Hans (The horse of Mr. von Osten): A
contribution to experimental animal and human psychology (C. L.
Rahn, Trans.). New York, NY: Henry Holt.
Phillips, W., Shankar, M., & Santos, L.(2010). Essentialism in the absence
of language? Evidence from rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). De-
velopmental Science, 13, F1–F7.
Piaget, J. (1929 [2007]). The child’s conception of the world. Plymouth:
Rowman & Littlefield.
Piaget, J. (1952). The child’s conception of number. New York: Norton.
Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approx-
imate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306,
499–503.
Pigliucci, M., & Boudry, M.(2011). Why machine-information metaphors
are bad for science and science education. Science & Education, 20,
453–471.
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. London: Allen Lane.
Pinker, S. (2005). So how does the mind work? Mind & Language, 20,
1–24.
Pinker, S.(2007). The stu↵ of thought: Language as a window into human
nature. New York: Viking.
Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and proper function. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Plato. (ca. 380 B.C.E. [2000]). Meno. In S. M. Cahn (Ed.), Exploring
philosophy. An introductory anthology (pp. 117–151). New York:
Oxford University Press.
Pletser, V., & Huylebrouck, D.(1999). The Ishango artefact: The missing
base 12 link. Forma, 14, 339–346.
Poling, D. A., & Evans, E. M. (2004). Are dinosaurs the rule or the
exception? Developing concepts of death and extinction. Cognitive
Development, 19, 363–383.
Pollard, B.(2005). Naturalizing the space of reasons. International Jour-
nal of Philosophical Studies, 13, 69–82.

35. Bibliography 301
Popper, K. (1994). In search of a better world. Lectures and essays from
thirty years. London: Routledge.
Potts, R. (1998). Variation selection in hominid evolution. Evolutionary
Anthropology, 7, 81–96.
Povinelli, D. J. (2000a). Folk physics for apes. The chimpanzee’s theory
of how the world works. Oxford and New York: Oxford University
Press.
Povinelli, D. J.(2000b). The minds of humans and apes are di↵erent out-
comes of an evolutionary experiment. In S. Fitzpatrick & J. Bruer
(Eds.), Carving our destiny: Scientific research faces a new millen-
nium (pp. 1–40). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences
and John Henry Press.
Povinelli, D. J., & Vonk, J. (2003). Chimpanzee minds: Suspiciously
human? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 157–160.
Preissler, M. A., & Bloom, P. (2007). Two-year-olds appreciate the dual
nature of pictures. Psychological Science, 18, 1-2.
Preuss, T. M., C´ceres, M., Oldham, M. C., & Geschwind, D. H. (2004).
a
Human brain evolution: Insights from microarrays. Nature Reviews
Genetics, 5, 850–860.
Price, G. (1972). Extension of covariance selection mathematics. Annals
of Human Genetics, 35, 485–490.
Prinz, J. J. (2002). Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual
basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pyysi¨inen, I.(2003). True fiction: Philosophy and psychology of religious
a
belief. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 109–125.
Pyysi¨inen, I., Lindeman, M., & Honkela, T.(2003). Counterintuitiveness
a
as the hallmark of religiosity. Religion, 33, 341–355.
Qin, Y., Carter, C. S., Silk, E. M., Stenger, V. A., Fissell, K., Goode,
A., & Anderson, J. R. (2004). The change of the brain activation
patterns as children learn algebra equation solving. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
101, 5686–5691.
Quallo, M. M., Price, C. J., Ueno, K., Asamizuya, T., Cheng, K., Lemon,
R. N., & Iriki, A.(2009). Gray and white matter changes associated
with tool-use learning in macaque monkeys. Proceedings of the Na-
tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106,
18379–18384.
Quine, W. V. O. (1969a). Epistemology naturalized. In W. V. O. Quine

36. 302 Bibliography
(Ed.), Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 69–90). New
York: Columbia University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1969b). Natural kinds. In W. V. O. Quine (Ed.),
Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 114–138). New York:
Columbia University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1975). The nature of natural knowledge. In S. Gut-
tenplan (Ed.), Mind and language: Wolfson College lectures (pp.
67–81). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1995). From stimulus to science. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Ramsey, G. (2006). Block fitness. Studies in History and Philosophy of
Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 37, 484–498.
Real, L. A.(1991). Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitive
architecture. Science, 253, 980–986.
Recanati, F. (1997). Can we believe what we do not understand? Mind
& Language, 12, 84–100.
Regier, T., Kay, P., Gilbert, A. L., & Ivry, R. B. (2010). Language and
thought: Which side are you on, anyway? In B. Malt & P. Wol↵
(Eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience
(pp. 165–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reid, T. (1764). An inquiry into the human mind, on the principles of
common sense. Edinburgh: Millar, Kincaid and Bell.
Resnik, M. D.(1982). Mathematics as the science of patterns: Epistemol-
ogy. Noˆs, 16, 95–105.
u
Restivo, S. (1992). Mathematics in society and history. Sociological in-
quiries. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone. How cul-
ture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Rips, L. J., Asmuth, J., & Bloomfield, A. (2006). Giving the boot to the
bootstrap: How not to learn the natural numbers. Cognition, 101,
B51–B60.
Rips, L. J., Bloomfield, A., & Asmuth, J.(2008). From numerical concepts
to concepts of number. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 623–642.
Robillard, P.-Y., Dekker, G. A., & Hulsey, T. C. (2002). Evolutionary
adaptations to pre-eclampsia/eclampsia in humans: Low fecund-
ability rate, loss of oestrus, prohibitions of incest and systematic
polyandry. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 47, 104–

37. Bibliography 303
111.
Rogers, A. R.(1988). Does biology constrain culture? American Anthro-
pologist, 90, 819–831.
Rogers, D. S., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2008). Natural selection and cultural
rates of change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the United States of America, 105, 3416–3420.
Rollenhagen, J. E., & Olson, C. R. (2000). Mirror-image confusion in
single neurons of the macaque inferotemporal cortex. Science, 287,
1506–1508.
Rosenberg, K., & Trevathan, W.(2002). Birth, obstetrics and human evo-
lution. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 1199–
1206.
Roth, P. (2007). Naturalism without fears. In S. P. Turner & M. W.
Risjord (Eds.), Philosophy of anthropology and sociology (pp. 683–
708). Amsterdam & Oxford: North-Holland.
Rowlands, M. (1997). Teleological semantics. Mind, 106, 279–303.
Roy, R.(2003). Babylonian Pythagoras’ theorem, the early history of zero
and a polemic on the study of the history of science. Resonance, 8,
30–40.
Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F.(2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science:
An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521–562.
Rugani, R., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G.(2008). Discrimination of small
numerosities in young chicks. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 388–399.
Rusconi, E., Walsh, V., & Butterworth, B. (2005). Dexterity with num-
bers: rTMS over left angular gyrus disrupts finger gnosis and num-
ber processing. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1609–1624.
Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. (1996). Mental mod-
els of the Earth, Sun, and Moon: Indian children’s cosmologies.
Cognitive Development, 11, 491–521.
Samarapungavan, A., & Wiers, R. W. (1997). Children’s thoughts on
the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. Cognitive
Science, 21, 147–177.
Samuels, R. (2000). Massively modular minds: Evolutionary psychol-
ogy and cognitive architecture. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamber-
lain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind. Modularity, language
and meta-cognition (pp. 13–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

38. 304 Bibliography
Samuels, R.(2002). Nativism in cognitive science. Mind & Language, 17,
233–265.
Samuels, R. (2004). Innateness in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 8, 136–141.
Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Arono↵, M. (2005). The emergence
of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
102, 2661–2665.
Sandrini, M., Rossini, P. M., & Miniussi, C. (2004). The di↵erential
involvement of inferior parietal lobule in number comparison: A
rTMS study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1902–1909.
Sarich, V. M., & Wilson, A. C. (1967). Immunological time scale for
hominid evolution. Science, 158, 1200–1203.
Sarnecka, B. W., & Gelman, S. A. (2004). Six does not just mean a lot:
Preschoolers see number words as specific. Cognition, 92, 329–352.
Saxe, G. B. (1981). Body parts as numerals: A developmental analysis
of numeration among the Oksapmin in Papua New Guinea. Child
Development, 52, 306–316.
Saxe, G. B. (1985). E↵ects of schooling on arithmetical understandings:
Studies with Oksapmin children in Papua New Guinea. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 77, 503–513.
Saxe, R., Tenenbaum, J., & Carey, S. (2005). Secret agents: Inferences
about hidden causes by 10- and 12-month-old infants. Psychological
Science, 16, 995–1001.
Schick, K. D., Toth, N., Garufi, G., Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., Rumbaugh,
D., & Sevcik, R. (1999). Continuing investigations into the stone
tool-making and tool-using capabilities of a bonobo (Pan paniscus).
Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, 821–832.
Schliesser, E.(2011). Newton’s challenge to philosophy: A programmatic
essay. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the
History of Philosophy of Science, 1, 101–128.
Schlimm, D., & Neth, H.(2008). Modeling ancient and modern arithmetic
practices: Addition and multiplication with arabic and roman nu-
merals. In V. Sloutsky, B. Love, & K. McRae (Eds.), Proceedings of
the 30th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin,
TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey,
D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dis-

39. Bibliography 305
sent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 6, 1080–1093.
Schwartz, D. L., Martin, T., & Pfa↵man, J. (2005). How mathematics
propels the development of physical knowledge. Journal of Cogni-
tion and Development, 6, 65–88.
Schwitzgebel, E., & Gordon, M. S.(2000). How well do we know our own
conscious experience? The case of human echolocation. Philosoph-
ical Topics, 28, 235–246.
Segal, G. (1996). The modularity of theory of mind. In P. Carruthers
& P. K. Smith (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind (pp. 141–157).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl
& M. Scriven (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of sci-
ence, foundations of science and the concepts of psychology and psy-
choanalysis (pp. 253–329). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press.
Semaw, S., Renne, P., Harris, J. W. K., Feibel, C. S., Bernor, R. L.,
Fesseha, N., & Mowbray, K.(1997). 2.5-Million-year-old stone tools
from Gona, Ethiopia. Nature, 385, 333–336.
Senut, B., Pickford, M., Gommery, D., Mein, P., Cheboi, K., & Coppens,
Y. (2001). First hominid from the Miocene (Lukeino Formation,
Kenya). Comptes Rendus de l’Acad´mie des Sciences–Series IIA,
e
332, 137–144.
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., & Marler, P.(1980). Monkey responses to
three di↵erent alarm calls: Evidence of predator classification and
semantic communication. Science, 210, 801–803.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Re-
flections on processes and objects as di↵erent sides of the same coin.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.
Sha↵er, M. (2008). Bayesianism, convergence and social epistemology.
Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 5, 203–219.
Shapiro, L., & Epstein, W. (1998). Evolutionary theory meets cognitive
psychology: A more selective perspective. Mind & Language, 13,
171–194.
Shapiro, S. (1997). Philosophy of mathematics: Structure and ontology.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shelishch, P. (1982). A quantitative study of biologists in the 18th and
19th centuries. Scientometrics, 4, 317–329.

40. 306 Bibliography
Shelley, C. (1999). Multiple analogies in archaeology. Philosophy of Sci-
ence, 66, 579–605.
Sherry, D. F., & Schacter, D. L.(1987). The evolution of multiple memory
systems. Psychological Review, 94, 439–454.
Shimojo, S., & Ichikawa, S. (1989). Intuitive reasoning about probabil-
ity: Theoretical and experimental analyses of the “problem of three
prisoners”. Cognition, 32, 1–24.
Shogenji, T. (2000). Self-dependent justification without circularity.
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51, 287–298.
Shtulman, A., & Schulz, L. (2008). The relation between essentialist
beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science, 32, 1049–
1062.
Shultz, T. R.(1982a). Causal reasoning in the social and nonsocial realms.
Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 14, 307–322.
Shultz, T. R. (1982b). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs for the
Society for Research in Child Development, 47, 1–51.
Siegal, M., Butterworth, G., & Newcombe, P. A. (2004). Culture and
children’s cosmology. Developmental Science, 7, 308–324.
Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L.(2004). Development of numerical estimation
in young children. Child Development, 75, 428–444.
Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E.(2003). The development of numerical estima-
tion: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity.
Psychological Science, 14, 237–243.
Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011). An integrated
theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psy-
chology, 62, 273–296.
Simon, H. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.
Simon, H. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the
American Philosophical Society, 106, 457–482.
Simon, O., Mangin, J.-F., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S.(2002).
Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-
related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron, 33, 475–487.
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained, stochastic
behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspec-
tives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494.
Simpson, G. G. (1950). Some principles of historical biology bearing on
human origins. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative

41. Bibliography 307
Biology, 15, 55–66.
Slater, A., & Quinn, P. C.(2001). Face recognition in the newborn infant.
Infant and Child Development, 10, 21–24.
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.
Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H. J., & Haynes, J. D. (2008). Uncon-
scious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nature
Neuroscience, 11, 543–545.
Spaepen, E., Coppola, M., Spelke, E. S., Carey, S. E., & Goldin-Meadow,
S. (2011). Number without a language model. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108,
3163–3168.
Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science,
14, 29–56.
Spelke, E. S.(2003). What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural
language. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in
mind. Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 277–311).
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental
Science, 10, 89–96.
Spelke, E. S., Phillips, A., & Woodward, A. L.(1995). Infants’ knowledge
of object motion and human action. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, &
A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. A multidisciplinary debate
(pp. 44–78). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Spelke, E. S., & Tsivkin, A. (2001). Language and number: A bilingual
training study. Cognition, 78, 45–88.
Sperber, D. (1985). Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemi-
ology of representations. Man, 20, 73–89.
Sperber, D. (1994). The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of
representations. In L. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping
the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 39–67).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture. A naturalistic approach. Oxford:
Blackwell.
Sperber, D.(1997). Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind & Language, 12,
67–83.
Sperber, D., & Hirschfeld, L. A. (2004). The cognitive foundations of
cultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8,