SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 10
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Entity Sample University Period 2014 Q2 
 E&M Analysis
This report contains a wealth of data about most E&M categories. By default, the provider is compared against both state and national benchmarks.
If there are at least three other providers in the practice with the same specialty, we also compare against the practice average for that specialty.
Provider 7: General Surgery
Risk Score: 100
New Office Visits  Risk score: 67
99201 99202 99203 99204 99205
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Percent
Frequency
Provider Practice National State
99201 99202 99203 99204 99205
-40.00
-20.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
RVU
RVU Exposure
Page 1 of 10  
Established Office Visits  Risk score: 3
99211 99212 99213 99214 99215
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Percent
Frequency
Provider Practice National State
99211 99212 99213 99214 99215
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
RVU
RVU Exposure
Initial Observation Care  Risk score: 0
99218 99219 99220
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Percent
Frequency
Provider Practice National State
99218 99219 99220
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
RVU
RVU Exposure
Page 2 of 10  
Initial Hospital Visits  Risk score: 97
99221 99222 99223
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Percent
Frequency
Provider Practice National State
99221 99222 99223
-150.00
-100.00
-50.00
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
RVU
RVU Exposure
Subsequent Hospital Visits  Risk score: 33
99231 99232 99233
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Percent
Frequency
Provider Practice National State
99231 99232 99233
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
RVU
RVU Exposure
Page 3 of 10  
Observation or Inpatient Care Service  Risk score: 0
99234 99235 99236
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Percent
Frequency
Provider Practice National State
99234 99235 99236
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
RVU
RVU Exposure
Discharge Days  Risk score: 0
99238 99239
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percent
Frequency
Provider Practice National State
99238 99239
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
RVU
RVU Exposure
Page 4 of 10  
New/Established Office Consultations  Risk score: 53
99241 99242 99243 99244 99245
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Percent
Frequency
Provider Practice National State
99241 99242 99243 99244 99245
-5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
RVU
RVU Exposure
Initial Inpatient Consultations  Risk score: 100
99251 99252 99253 99254 99255
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Percent
Frequency
Provider Practice National State
99251 99252 99253 99254 99255
-100.00
-50.00
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
350.00
RVU
RVU Exposure
Page 5 of 10  
Emergency Department Services  Risk score: 69
99281 99282 99283 99284 99285
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Percent
Frequency
Provider Practice National State
99281 99282 99283 99284 99285
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
RVU
RVU Exposure
Comprehensive Nursing Facility Assessments  Risk score: 0
99304 99305 99306
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percent
Frequency
Provider Practice National State
99304 99305 99306
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
RVU
RVU Exposure
Page 6 of 10  
Subsequent Nursing Facility Assessments  Risk score: 0
99307 99308 99309 99310
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percent
Frequency
Provider Practice National State
99307 99308 99309 99310
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
RVU
RVU Exposure
Page 7 of 10  
Critical Care
99291
99292
99468
99469
99471
99472
99475
99476
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Percent
Expected Utilization vs Observed
Observed Expected
Prolonged Care
99354
99355
99356
99357
99358
99359
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Percent
Expected Utilization vs Observed
Observed Expected
Page 8 of 10  
Time-based Care Ratios
Description of Service for Comparison Provider National Variance from National State Variance from State
Adult Critical Care - 99291 to 99292 25.25 10.20 147.4 % 13.73 83.9 %
Pediatric Critical Care - 99475 to 99476 0.00 0.00 0.0 % 0.00 0.0 %
Pediatric Critical Care - 99471 to 99472 0.00 0.00 0.0 % 0.00 0.0 %
Neonate Critical Care - 99468 to 99469 0.00 0.00 0.0 % 0.00 0.0 %
Prolonged outpatient service - 99354 to 99355 0.00 26.62 -100.0 % 26.38 -100.0 %
Prolonged inpatient service - 99356 to 99357 0.00 6.60 -100.0 % 16.14 -100.0 %
Prolonged E&M service - 99358 to 99359 0.00 12.81 -100.0 % 0.00 0.0 %
Intercategory Ratios
Description of Service for Comparison Provider National Variance from National State Variance from State
Office Consult to New Office Visit 0.36 0.00 N/A 0.00 N/A
Discharge Days to Initial Hospital Visit 0.00 0.10 -100.0 % 0.06 -100.0 %
Established Office Visit to New Office Visit 0.91 2.52 -63.9 % 2.43 -62.6 %
Subsequent Hospital Visit to Initial Hospital Visit 0.08 2.13 -96.3 % 1.93 -95.9 %
Inpatient Consultations to Initial Hospital Visit 0.78 0.00 N/A 0.00 N/A
Inpatient Consultations to Subsequent Hospital Visit 9.83 0.00 N/A 0.00 N/A
Initial Observation Care to Initial Hospital Visit 0.00 0.03 -100.0 % 0.01 -100.0 %
Observation or Inpatient Care to Initial Observation 0.00 0.29 -100.0 % 0.71 -100.0 %
Observation or Inpatient Care to Initial Hospital Visit 0.00 0.01 -100.0 % 0.01 -100.0 %
Global Category Percent
Category Descriptions Provider National Variance from National State Variance from State
Total Number of E&M Services Calculated 298
New Office Visits to All E&M Codes 7.4 % 16.6 % -55.6 % 0.16 -54.8 %
Established Office Visits to All E&M codes 6.7 % 41.8 % -84.0 % 0.40 -83.1 %
Initial Hospital Visits to All E&M Codes 25.5 % 10.4 % 146.1 % 0.12 113.6 %
Subsequent Hospital Visits to All E&M Codes 2.0 % 22.1 % -90.9 % 0.23 -91.3 %
Outpatient Consults to All E&M Codes 2.7 % 0.1 % N/A 0.00 0.0 %
Inpatient Consults to All E&M Codes 19.8 % 0.0 % N/A 0.00 0.0 %
Emergency Department Services to All E&M Codes 0.7 % 1.3 % -47.7 % 0.01 -16.3 %
Comprehensive Nursing Home Visits to All E&M Codes 0.0 % 0.4 % -100.0 % 0.01 -100.0 %
Subsequent Nursing Home Visits to All E&M Codes 0.0 % 2.8 % -100.0 % 0.03 -100.0 %
Category Summaries Provider National Variance from National State Variance from State
All Office Visits to All E&M Codes 14.1 % 58.4 % -75.9 % 56.03 -99.7 %
All Hospital Visits to All E&M Codes 27.5 % 32.5 % -15.2 % 35.02 -99.2 %
All Consults to All E&M Codes 22.5 % 0.1 % N/A 0.00 N/A
Page 9 of 10  
Category Descriptions Provider National Variance from National State Variance from State
All Nursing Home Visits to All E&M Codes 0.0 % 3.2 % -100.0 % 4.19 -100.0 %
All E&M Visits to All Procedures 42.6 % 49.4 % -13.8 % 0.49 -13.6 %
Utilization Distribution Calculations by Category
Category Provider RVU National RVU Variance from National State RVU Variance from State
All 0.00 0.00 0.0 % 0.00 0.0 %
New Office Visits 5.65 3.60 57.0 % 3.86 46.6 %
Established Office Visits 3.12 2.10 48.6 % 2.18 43.3 %
Initial Observation Care 0.00 3.94 -100.0 % 3.98 -100.0 %
Initial Hospital Visits 5.70 4.39 29.8 % 4.54 25.5 %
Subsequent Hospital Visits 2.91 1.85 57.6 % 1.92 51.2 %
Observation or Inpatient Care Service 0.00 4.73 -100.0 % 4.79 -100.0 %
Discharge Days 0.00 2.14 -100.0 % 2.28 -100.0 %
New/Established Office Consultations 5.35 4.16 28.7 % 3.85 39.1 %
Initial Inpatient Consultations 5.64 3.42 64.8 % 2.83 99.2 %
Emergency Department Services 4.85 3.13 54.9 % 3.15 54.0 %
Comprehensive Nursing Facility Assessments 0.00 3.56 -100.0 % 4.11 -100.0 %
Subsequent Nursing Facility Assessments 0.00 2.96 -100.0 % 3.03 -100.0 %
Charge Differential Calculations by Category
Category
Provider
RVU
Expected RVU
(National)
RVU Differential
(National)
Expected RVU
(State)
RVU Differential
(State)
New Office Visits 124.40 79.25 45.15 84.82 39.58
Established Office Visits 62.32 41.96 20.36 43.50 18.82
Initial Observation Care 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Hospital Visits 433.20 333.92 99.28 345.24 87.96
Subsequent Hospital Visits 17.46 11.08 6.38 11.55 5.91
Observation or Inpatient Care Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Discharge Days 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
New/Established Office Consultations 42.80 33.25 9.55 30.77 12.03
Initial Inpatient Consultations 332.57 201.82 130.75 166.97 165.60
Emergency Department Services 9.70 6.26 3.44 6.30 3.40
Comprehensive Nursing Facility Assessments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Subsequent Nursing Facility Assessments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
RVU Totals 1,022.45 707.53 314.92 689.14 333.31
Dollar Totals (CF = 35.8228) 36,627.02 25,345.86 11,281.16 24,687.06 11,939.97
Page 10 of 10  

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Pistoia Alliance conference April 2016: Mini Startup Challenge: Agewell
Pistoia Alliance conference April 2016: Mini Startup Challenge: AgewellPistoia Alliance conference April 2016: Mini Startup Challenge: Agewell
Pistoia Alliance conference April 2016: Mini Startup Challenge: AgewellPistoia Alliance
 
National annual report
National annual reportNational annual report
National annual reportCACTUS_JP
 
Patient Engagement
Patient EngagementPatient Engagement
Patient Engagementathenahealth
 
Payer Trends in the ASC Industry
Payer Trends in the ASC IndustryPayer Trends in the ASC Industry
Payer Trends in the ASC IndustryPYA, P.C.
 
Driving Efficiency in Community Health
Driving Efficiency in Community HealthDriving Efficiency in Community Health
Driving Efficiency in Community Healthathenahealth
 
Resume Wizard anita's
Resume Wizard anita'sResume Wizard anita's
Resume Wizard anita'sAnita Leonard
 
Improving Eye Care Outpatient Services with Simulation
Improving Eye Care Outpatient Services with SimulationImproving Eye Care Outpatient Services with Simulation
Improving Eye Care Outpatient Services with SimulationSIMUL8 Corporation
 
Convert with Confidence: Barriers and Benefits of the EHR Switch
Convert with Confidence: Barriers and Benefits of the EHR SwitchConvert with Confidence: Barriers and Benefits of the EHR Switch
Convert with Confidence: Barriers and Benefits of the EHR Switchathenahealth
 
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Using Oper...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One -  Using Oper...Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One -  Using Oper...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Using Oper...RBFHealth
 
10 Things You Need to Know About MIPS and APM
10 Things You Need to Know About MIPS and APM10 Things You Need to Know About MIPS and APM
10 Things You Need to Know About MIPS and APMathenahealth
 
Software Advice BuyerView: Electronic Health Records Report 2014
Software Advice BuyerView: Electronic Health Records Report 2014Software Advice BuyerView: Electronic Health Records Report 2014
Software Advice BuyerView: Electronic Health Records Report 2014Software Advice
 
Patient-Centered Medical Home: Navigating through Recognition and Rewards
Patient-Centered Medical Home: Navigating through Recognition and RewardsPatient-Centered Medical Home: Navigating through Recognition and Rewards
Patient-Centered Medical Home: Navigating through Recognition and Rewardsathenahealth
 
The Future of Health Care: A Prognosis for 2016
The Future of Health Care: A Prognosis for 2016The Future of Health Care: A Prognosis for 2016
The Future of Health Care: A Prognosis for 2016athenahealth
 
52795 collaboration
52795 collaboration52795 collaboration
52795 collaborationChascooper
 

Was ist angesagt? (15)

MIPS Deep Dive
MIPS Deep DiveMIPS Deep Dive
MIPS Deep Dive
 
Pistoia Alliance conference April 2016: Mini Startup Challenge: Agewell
Pistoia Alliance conference April 2016: Mini Startup Challenge: AgewellPistoia Alliance conference April 2016: Mini Startup Challenge: Agewell
Pistoia Alliance conference April 2016: Mini Startup Challenge: Agewell
 
National annual report
National annual reportNational annual report
National annual report
 
Patient Engagement
Patient EngagementPatient Engagement
Patient Engagement
 
Payer Trends in the ASC Industry
Payer Trends in the ASC IndustryPayer Trends in the ASC Industry
Payer Trends in the ASC Industry
 
Driving Efficiency in Community Health
Driving Efficiency in Community HealthDriving Efficiency in Community Health
Driving Efficiency in Community Health
 
Resume Wizard anita's
Resume Wizard anita'sResume Wizard anita's
Resume Wizard anita's
 
Improving Eye Care Outpatient Services with Simulation
Improving Eye Care Outpatient Services with SimulationImproving Eye Care Outpatient Services with Simulation
Improving Eye Care Outpatient Services with Simulation
 
Convert with Confidence: Barriers and Benefits of the EHR Switch
Convert with Confidence: Barriers and Benefits of the EHR SwitchConvert with Confidence: Barriers and Benefits of the EHR Switch
Convert with Confidence: Barriers and Benefits of the EHR Switch
 
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Using Oper...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One -  Using Oper...Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One -  Using Oper...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Using Oper...
 
10 Things You Need to Know About MIPS and APM
10 Things You Need to Know About MIPS and APM10 Things You Need to Know About MIPS and APM
10 Things You Need to Know About MIPS and APM
 
Software Advice BuyerView: Electronic Health Records Report 2014
Software Advice BuyerView: Electronic Health Records Report 2014Software Advice BuyerView: Electronic Health Records Report 2014
Software Advice BuyerView: Electronic Health Records Report 2014
 
Patient-Centered Medical Home: Navigating through Recognition and Rewards
Patient-Centered Medical Home: Navigating through Recognition and RewardsPatient-Centered Medical Home: Navigating through Recognition and Rewards
Patient-Centered Medical Home: Navigating through Recognition and Rewards
 
The Future of Health Care: A Prognosis for 2016
The Future of Health Care: A Prognosis for 2016The Future of Health Care: A Prognosis for 2016
The Future of Health Care: A Prognosis for 2016
 
52795 collaboration
52795 collaboration52795 collaboration
52795 collaboration
 

Ähnlich wie EmDetail

Experiences from State Health System Development Project.ppt
Experiences from State Health System Development Project.pptExperiences from State Health System Development Project.ppt
Experiences from State Health System Development Project.pptsuvadeepde
 
SEAAI New News Presentation
SEAAI New News PresentationSEAAI New News Presentation
SEAAI New News PresentationKSAAI
 
Using the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice Management
Using the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice ManagementUsing the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice Management
Using the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice ManagementWarren E. Corprew, Jr. MBA CMA CHFP
 
John Billings: Developing a new predictive risk model
John Billings: Developing a new predictive risk modelJohn Billings: Developing a new predictive risk model
John Billings: Developing a new predictive risk modelNuffield Trust
 
SCIE Investor Presentation January 2017
SCIE Investor Presentation January 2017SCIE Investor Presentation January 2017
SCIE Investor Presentation January 2017Mike Oliver
 
Stephen Radley Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
Stephen Radley Consultant Obstetrician & GynaecologistStephen Radley Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
Stephen Radley Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist3GDR
 
Implementation of evidence-based quality improvement in Victorian emergency d...
Implementation of evidence-based quality improvement in Victorian emergency d...Implementation of evidence-based quality improvement in Victorian emergency d...
Implementation of evidence-based quality improvement in Victorian emergency d...kellyam18
 
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Using OP Da...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Using OP Da...Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Using OP Da...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Using OP Da...RBFHealth
 
Supporting Population Health Management by Andrew Bloschichak, MD, MBA
Supporting Population Health Management by Andrew Bloschichak, MD, MBA Supporting Population Health Management by Andrew Bloschichak, MD, MBA
Supporting Population Health Management by Andrew Bloschichak, MD, MBA Benjamin Pease
 
Watford Borough Council Case Study
Watford Borough Council Case StudyWatford Borough Council Case Study
Watford Borough Council Case StudySteve Carter
 
2014 December 16 - eHI Survey Summary - BLUE AND GRAY LAY OUT BY WARREN - FINAL
2014 December 16 - eHI Survey Summary - BLUE AND GRAY LAY OUT BY WARREN - FINAL2014 December 16 - eHI Survey Summary - BLUE AND GRAY LAY OUT BY WARREN - FINAL
2014 December 16 - eHI Survey Summary - BLUE AND GRAY LAY OUT BY WARREN - FINALCarrie Bauman
 
Health Education/Risk Reduction referrals to HIV testing in non-clinical sett...
Health Education/Risk Reduction referrals to HIV testing in non-clinical sett...Health Education/Risk Reduction referrals to HIV testing in non-clinical sett...
Health Education/Risk Reduction referrals to HIV testing in non-clinical sett...CDC NPIN
 
poster_research
poster_researchposter_research
poster_researchFem Ozcan
 

Ähnlich wie EmDetail (20)

Experiences from State Health System Development Project.ppt
Experiences from State Health System Development Project.pptExperiences from State Health System Development Project.ppt
Experiences from State Health System Development Project.ppt
 
SEAAI New News Presentation
SEAAI New News PresentationSEAAI New News Presentation
SEAAI New News Presentation
 
Psych Survey Initial.pdf
Psych Survey Initial.pdfPsych Survey Initial.pdf
Psych Survey Initial.pdf
 
Using the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice Management
Using the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice ManagementUsing the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice Management
Using the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice Management
 
The Extent and Impact of Needlestick Injuries at the Waikato DHB
The Extent and Impact of Needlestick Injuries at the Waikato DHBThe Extent and Impact of Needlestick Injuries at the Waikato DHB
The Extent and Impact of Needlestick Injuries at the Waikato DHB
 
PPS Nsambya Presentation
PPS Nsambya PresentationPPS Nsambya Presentation
PPS Nsambya Presentation
 
John Billings: Developing a new predictive risk model
John Billings: Developing a new predictive risk modelJohn Billings: Developing a new predictive risk model
John Billings: Developing a new predictive risk model
 
SCIE Investor Presentation January 2017
SCIE Investor Presentation January 2017SCIE Investor Presentation January 2017
SCIE Investor Presentation January 2017
 
Stephen Radley Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
Stephen Radley Consultant Obstetrician & GynaecologistStephen Radley Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
Stephen Radley Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
 
Implementation of evidence-based quality improvement in Victorian emergency d...
Implementation of evidence-based quality improvement in Victorian emergency d...Implementation of evidence-based quality improvement in Victorian emergency d...
Implementation of evidence-based quality improvement in Victorian emergency d...
 
Improving CPR success rate Improvement Project (FOCUS-PDCA)
Improving CPR success rate Improvement Project (FOCUS-PDCA)Improving CPR success rate Improvement Project (FOCUS-PDCA)
Improving CPR success rate Improvement Project (FOCUS-PDCA)
 
EPR-delivered CPOE adoption rates predict reduced LOS
EPR-delivered CPOE adoption rates predict reduced LOSEPR-delivered CPOE adoption rates predict reduced LOS
EPR-delivered CPOE adoption rates predict reduced LOS
 
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Using OP Da...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Using OP Da...Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Using OP Da...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Using OP Da...
 
2014 03 11 neo company overview presentation
2014 03 11   neo company overview presentation2014 03 11   neo company overview presentation
2014 03 11 neo company overview presentation
 
NeoGenomics Laboratory Company Overview 2014-03-11
NeoGenomics Laboratory Company Overview 2014-03-11 NeoGenomics Laboratory Company Overview 2014-03-11
NeoGenomics Laboratory Company Overview 2014-03-11
 
Supporting Population Health Management by Andrew Bloschichak, MD, MBA
Supporting Population Health Management by Andrew Bloschichak, MD, MBA Supporting Population Health Management by Andrew Bloschichak, MD, MBA
Supporting Population Health Management by Andrew Bloschichak, MD, MBA
 
Watford Borough Council Case Study
Watford Borough Council Case StudyWatford Borough Council Case Study
Watford Borough Council Case Study
 
2014 December 16 - eHI Survey Summary - BLUE AND GRAY LAY OUT BY WARREN - FINAL
2014 December 16 - eHI Survey Summary - BLUE AND GRAY LAY OUT BY WARREN - FINAL2014 December 16 - eHI Survey Summary - BLUE AND GRAY LAY OUT BY WARREN - FINAL
2014 December 16 - eHI Survey Summary - BLUE AND GRAY LAY OUT BY WARREN - FINAL
 
Health Education/Risk Reduction referrals to HIV testing in non-clinical sett...
Health Education/Risk Reduction referrals to HIV testing in non-clinical sett...Health Education/Risk Reduction referrals to HIV testing in non-clinical sett...
Health Education/Risk Reduction referrals to HIV testing in non-clinical sett...
 
poster_research
poster_researchposter_research
poster_research
 

EmDetail

  • 2. Established Office Visits  Risk score: 3 99211 99212 99213 99214 99215 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Percent Frequency Provider Practice National State 99211 99212 99213 99214 99215 -20.00 -10.00 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 RVU RVU Exposure Initial Observation Care  Risk score: 0 99218 99219 99220 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Percent Frequency Provider Practice National State 99218 99219 99220 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 RVU RVU Exposure Page 2 of 10  
  • 3. Initial Hospital Visits  Risk score: 97 99221 99222 99223 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Percent Frequency Provider Practice National State 99221 99222 99223 -150.00 -100.00 -50.00 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 RVU RVU Exposure Subsequent Hospital Visits  Risk score: 33 99231 99232 99233 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Percent Frequency Provider Practice National State 99231 99232 99233 -10.00 -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 RVU RVU Exposure Page 3 of 10  
  • 4. Observation or Inpatient Care Service  Risk score: 0 99234 99235 99236 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Percent Frequency Provider Practice National State 99234 99235 99236 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 RVU RVU Exposure Discharge Days  Risk score: 0 99238 99239 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Frequency Provider Practice National State 99238 99239 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 RVU RVU Exposure Page 4 of 10  
  • 5. New/Established Office Consultations  Risk score: 53 99241 99242 99243 99244 99245 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Percent Frequency Provider Practice National State 99241 99242 99243 99244 99245 -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 RVU RVU Exposure Initial Inpatient Consultations  Risk score: 100 99251 99252 99253 99254 99255 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Percent Frequency Provider Practice National State 99251 99252 99253 99254 99255 -100.00 -50.00 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 RVU RVU Exposure Page 5 of 10  
  • 6. Emergency Department Services  Risk score: 69 99281 99282 99283 99284 99285 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Percent Frequency Provider Practice National State 99281 99282 99283 99284 99285 -3.00 -2.00 -1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 RVU RVU Exposure Comprehensive Nursing Facility Assessments  Risk score: 0 99304 99305 99306 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percent Frequency Provider Practice National State 99304 99305 99306 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 RVU RVU Exposure Page 6 of 10  
  • 7. Subsequent Nursing Facility Assessments  Risk score: 0 99307 99308 99309 99310 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percent Frequency Provider Practice National State 99307 99308 99309 99310 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 RVU RVU Exposure Page 7 of 10  
  • 9. Time-based Care Ratios Description of Service for Comparison Provider National Variance from National State Variance from State Adult Critical Care - 99291 to 99292 25.25 10.20 147.4 % 13.73 83.9 % Pediatric Critical Care - 99475 to 99476 0.00 0.00 0.0 % 0.00 0.0 % Pediatric Critical Care - 99471 to 99472 0.00 0.00 0.0 % 0.00 0.0 % Neonate Critical Care - 99468 to 99469 0.00 0.00 0.0 % 0.00 0.0 % Prolonged outpatient service - 99354 to 99355 0.00 26.62 -100.0 % 26.38 -100.0 % Prolonged inpatient service - 99356 to 99357 0.00 6.60 -100.0 % 16.14 -100.0 % Prolonged E&M service - 99358 to 99359 0.00 12.81 -100.0 % 0.00 0.0 % Intercategory Ratios Description of Service for Comparison Provider National Variance from National State Variance from State Office Consult to New Office Visit 0.36 0.00 N/A 0.00 N/A Discharge Days to Initial Hospital Visit 0.00 0.10 -100.0 % 0.06 -100.0 % Established Office Visit to New Office Visit 0.91 2.52 -63.9 % 2.43 -62.6 % Subsequent Hospital Visit to Initial Hospital Visit 0.08 2.13 -96.3 % 1.93 -95.9 % Inpatient Consultations to Initial Hospital Visit 0.78 0.00 N/A 0.00 N/A Inpatient Consultations to Subsequent Hospital Visit 9.83 0.00 N/A 0.00 N/A Initial Observation Care to Initial Hospital Visit 0.00 0.03 -100.0 % 0.01 -100.0 % Observation or Inpatient Care to Initial Observation 0.00 0.29 -100.0 % 0.71 -100.0 % Observation or Inpatient Care to Initial Hospital Visit 0.00 0.01 -100.0 % 0.01 -100.0 % Global Category Percent Category Descriptions Provider National Variance from National State Variance from State Total Number of E&M Services Calculated 298 New Office Visits to All E&M Codes 7.4 % 16.6 % -55.6 % 0.16 -54.8 % Established Office Visits to All E&M codes 6.7 % 41.8 % -84.0 % 0.40 -83.1 % Initial Hospital Visits to All E&M Codes 25.5 % 10.4 % 146.1 % 0.12 113.6 % Subsequent Hospital Visits to All E&M Codes 2.0 % 22.1 % -90.9 % 0.23 -91.3 % Outpatient Consults to All E&M Codes 2.7 % 0.1 % N/A 0.00 0.0 % Inpatient Consults to All E&M Codes 19.8 % 0.0 % N/A 0.00 0.0 % Emergency Department Services to All E&M Codes 0.7 % 1.3 % -47.7 % 0.01 -16.3 % Comprehensive Nursing Home Visits to All E&M Codes 0.0 % 0.4 % -100.0 % 0.01 -100.0 % Subsequent Nursing Home Visits to All E&M Codes 0.0 % 2.8 % -100.0 % 0.03 -100.0 % Category Summaries Provider National Variance from National State Variance from State All Office Visits to All E&M Codes 14.1 % 58.4 % -75.9 % 56.03 -99.7 % All Hospital Visits to All E&M Codes 27.5 % 32.5 % -15.2 % 35.02 -99.2 % All Consults to All E&M Codes 22.5 % 0.1 % N/A 0.00 N/A Page 9 of 10  
  • 10. Category Descriptions Provider National Variance from National State Variance from State All Nursing Home Visits to All E&M Codes 0.0 % 3.2 % -100.0 % 4.19 -100.0 % All E&M Visits to All Procedures 42.6 % 49.4 % -13.8 % 0.49 -13.6 % Utilization Distribution Calculations by Category Category Provider RVU National RVU Variance from National State RVU Variance from State All 0.00 0.00 0.0 % 0.00 0.0 % New Office Visits 5.65 3.60 57.0 % 3.86 46.6 % Established Office Visits 3.12 2.10 48.6 % 2.18 43.3 % Initial Observation Care 0.00 3.94 -100.0 % 3.98 -100.0 % Initial Hospital Visits 5.70 4.39 29.8 % 4.54 25.5 % Subsequent Hospital Visits 2.91 1.85 57.6 % 1.92 51.2 % Observation or Inpatient Care Service 0.00 4.73 -100.0 % 4.79 -100.0 % Discharge Days 0.00 2.14 -100.0 % 2.28 -100.0 % New/Established Office Consultations 5.35 4.16 28.7 % 3.85 39.1 % Initial Inpatient Consultations 5.64 3.42 64.8 % 2.83 99.2 % Emergency Department Services 4.85 3.13 54.9 % 3.15 54.0 % Comprehensive Nursing Facility Assessments 0.00 3.56 -100.0 % 4.11 -100.0 % Subsequent Nursing Facility Assessments 0.00 2.96 -100.0 % 3.03 -100.0 % Charge Differential Calculations by Category Category Provider RVU Expected RVU (National) RVU Differential (National) Expected RVU (State) RVU Differential (State) New Office Visits 124.40 79.25 45.15 84.82 39.58 Established Office Visits 62.32 41.96 20.36 43.50 18.82 Initial Observation Care 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Initial Hospital Visits 433.20 333.92 99.28 345.24 87.96 Subsequent Hospital Visits 17.46 11.08 6.38 11.55 5.91 Observation or Inpatient Care Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Discharge Days 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 New/Established Office Consultations 42.80 33.25 9.55 30.77 12.03 Initial Inpatient Consultations 332.57 201.82 130.75 166.97 165.60 Emergency Department Services 9.70 6.26 3.44 6.30 3.40 Comprehensive Nursing Facility Assessments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Subsequent Nursing Facility Assessments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RVU Totals 1,022.45 707.53 314.92 689.14 333.31 Dollar Totals (CF = 35.8228) 36,627.02 25,345.86 11,281.16 24,687.06 11,939.97 Page 10 of 10