Call Girls Bangalore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Peripheral Nerve Catheters - Rajnish Gupta
1. PERIPHERAL NERVE CATHETERS
LESSONS FROM A DECADE OF PRACTICE
Rajnish Gupta, MD
Associate Professor, Anesthesiology
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
August 31, 2018
@dr_rajgupta
2. DISCLOSURES
▸ I’m the lead developer for the ASRA Coags, ASRA LAST, & ASRA Timeout apps
▸ My institution receives revenue from sales of the apps. I do not.
7. Youalreadyknow
thisstuff…
Peripheral nerve blocks improve patient outcomes
Opioid reduction in any amount is good for the patient
A lot can be achieved with multimodal analgesia and ERAS protocols
Peripheral nerve blocks can facilitate OR and PACU efficiency
11. OBJECTIVES
01Value of Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks over Single Shot Blocks
02Complications related to CPNB and Pitfalls to avoid
12. OBJECTIVES
01Value of Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks over Single Shot Blocks
02Complications related to CPNB and Pitfalls to avoid
03Tips for an Ambulatory Catheter Management Program
13. OBJECTIVES
01Value of Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks over Single Shot Blocks
02Complications related to CPNB and Pitfalls to avoid
03Tips for an Ambulatory Catheter Management Program
04Alternatives and Future Directions
14. EDDIE
68 yo M with
osteoarthritis,
scheduled for
primary Right TSA
VANESSA
57 yo F with
reduced ROM after
TKA presenting Left
Knee Manipulation
and aggressive PT
KIKI
24 yo F with history
Left ankle ORIF after
MVC. Presents for
ankle fusion due to
chronic ankle pain
15. BENEFITS OF CPNB
Improved analgesia vs Single-shot
Can reduce length of stay, particularly in ambulatory
Potential in reducing chronic pain and long-term
opioid escalation
Longer duration reduces risk of rebound pain
Enhanced physical therapy and rehabilitation
Improved Patient Satisfaction
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
17. PAIN
HYPERSENSITIVITY
Kissin I. Anesthesiology. 2000
Prevention of long term pain or rebound pain is
dependent on both the timing and duration of nerve block
Short Duration Block — allows for rebound pain and
potential for long-term hypersensitivity
18. PAIN
HYPERSENSITIVITY
Kissin I. Anesthesiology. 2000
Prevention of long term pain or rebound pain is
dependent on both the timing and duration of nerve block
Short Duration Block — allows for rebound pain and
potential for long-term hypersensitivity
Longer Duration, Early Block - prevents re-initiation of
hypersensitivity, particularly for moderate levels of pain
19. PAIN
HYPERSENSITIVITY
Kissin I. Anesthesiology. 2000
Prevention of long term pain or rebound pain is
dependent on both the timing and duration of nerve block
Short Duration Block — allows for rebound pain and
potential for long-term hypersensitivity
Longer Duration, Early Block - prevents re-initiation of
hypersensitivity, particularly for moderate levels of pain
Longest Duration Block - will need significantly longer
analgesia if re-initiation has begun or surgical pain is profound
21. LENGTH OF STAY
SINGLE SHOT VS CPNB
Lenart MJ. Pain Med. 2012
Patients with catheters were nearly twice as likely to be
discharged from the hospital than patients with no blocks for
Orthopedic surgeries
22. LENGTH OF STAY
SINGLE SHOT VS CPNB
Lenart MJ. Pain Med. 2012
Didn’t hold true for our Total Knee Arthroplasty patients
23. LENGTH OF STAY
SINGLE SHOT VS CPNB
Lenart MJ. Pain Med. 2012
Biggest benefit in Shoulder surgeries, LE amputations, and
Foot/ankle surgeries
24. LENGTH OF STAY
SINGLE SHOT VS CPNB
Lenart MJ. Pain Med. 2012
Biggest benefit in Shoulder surgeries, LE amputations, and
Foot/ankle surgeries
27. SINGLE VS DUAL CATHETER FOOT/ANKLE SURGERY
Jarrell K. Foot Ankle Int. 2018
28. SINGLE VS DUAL CATHETER FOOT/ANKLE SURGERY
PATIENT SATISFACTION
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DOS POD1 POD2 POD3
Jarrell K. Foot Ankle Int. 2018
29. SINGLE VS DUAL CATHETER FOOT/ANKLE SURGERY
PATIENT SATISFACTION
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DOS POD1 POD2 POD3
More pain in the single catheter (popliteal) group
Less satisfaction with the pain control in single catheter group
Increased opioid use on POD1 in the single catheter group
Jarrell K. Foot Ankle Int. 2018
30. SINGLE VS DUAL CATHETER FOOT/ANKLE SURGERY
PATIENT SATISFACTION
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DOS POD1 POD2 POD3
More pain in the single catheter (popliteal) group
Less satisfaction with the pain control in single catheter group
Increased opioid use on POD1 in the single catheter group
Jarrell K. Foot Ankle Int. 2018
32. REBOUND PAIN
Rotator cuff repair:
single shot (G1) vs
catheter (G2) vs
no block (G3)
Kim J-H. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018.
33. REBOUND PAIN
Rotator cuff repair:
single shot (G1) vs
catheter (G2) vs
no block (G3)
Kim J-H. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018.
34. REBOUND PAIN
Rotator cuff repair:
single shot (G1) vs
catheter (G2) vs
no block (G3)
Kim J-H. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018.
35. REBOUND PAIN
Rotator cuff repair:
single shot (G1) vs
catheter (G2) vs
no block (G3)
Kim J-H. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018.
36. REBOUND PAIN
Editorial Commentary:
“Pain and Stress
Response After
Shoulder Arthroscopic
Rotator Cuff Repair:
Does Interscalene Block
Make a Clinically
Important Difference?”
Rossi MJ. Arthroscopy. 2017.
*SISB - single dose interscalene block
37. REBOUND PAIN
Editorial Commentary:
“Pain and Stress
Response After
Shoulder Arthroscopic
Rotator Cuff Repair:
Does Interscalene Block
Make a Clinically
Important Difference?”
Rossi MJ. Arthroscopy. 2017.
*SISB - single dose interscalene block
“This calls into question the true
clinically important magnitude of the
effect of SISB* … further confounded
by the “rebound effect” seen by the
SISB/GA group at 18 hours
postoperation… We have all witnessed
this “getting behind the 8 ball” among
our patients when the block abandons
them to their less than saturated m-
opioid receptor… In the end, could the
rebound in pain mitigate against the
potential benefit of a block?”
38. REBOUND PAIN
Editorial Commentary:
“Pain and Stress
Response After
Shoulder Arthroscopic
Rotator Cuff Repair:
Does Interscalene Block
Make a Clinically
Important Difference?”
Rossi MJ. Arthroscopy. 2017.
*SISB - single dose interscalene block
“This calls into question the true
clinically important magnitude of the
effect of SISB* … further confounded
by the “rebound effect” seen by the
SISB/GA group at 18 hours
postoperation… We have all witnessed
this “getting behind the 8 ball” among
our patients when the block abandons
them to their less than saturated m-
opioid receptor… In the end, could the
rebound in pain mitigate against the
potential benefit of a block?”
39. REBOUND PAIN
Ankle Fracture Surgery - Patients’ experiences
Pre-emptive oral medications can help, but not 100%
People do value the mental alertness and pain relief when
the blocks are working
Morphine was effective at controlling pain and
temporarily decreasing the feeling of despair
Severe pain predominately occurred at night
Henningsen MJ. Anaesthesia. 2018.
40. REBOUND PAIN
Ankle Fracture Surgery - Patients’ experiences
Pre-emptive oral medications can help, but not 100%
People do value the mental alertness and pain relief when
the blocks are working
Morphine was effective at controlling pain and
temporarily decreasing the feeling of despair
Severe pain predominately occurred at night
Henningsen MJ. Anaesthesia. 2018.
41. REBOUND PAIN
Ankle Fracture Surgery - Patients’ experiences
Pre-emptive oral medications can help, but not 100%
People do value the mental alertness and pain relief when
the blocks are working
Morphine was effective at controlling pain and
temporarily decreasing the feeling of despair
Severe pain predominately occurred at night
Henningsen MJ. Anaesthesia. 2018.
“It was like they poured boiling
water over my foot – and then
imagine that for two hours without
any decrease in pain”
42. REBOUND PAIN
Ankle Fracture Surgery - Patients’ experiences
Pre-emptive oral medications can help, but not 100%
People do value the mental alertness and pain relief when
the blocks are working
Morphine was effective at controlling pain and
temporarily decreasing the feeling of despair
Severe pain predominately occurred at night
Henningsen MJ. Anaesthesia. 2018.
“It was like they poured boiling
water over my foot – and then
imagine that for two hours without
any decrease in pain”
“I woke up at midnight, and
then, it was like ... it burned and at
the same time I couldn’t feel my
toes.”
43. REBOUND PAIN
Ankle Fracture Surgery - Patients’ experiences
Pre-emptive oral medications can help, but not 100%
People do value the mental alertness and pain relief when
the blocks are working
Morphine was effective at controlling pain and
temporarily decreasing the feeling of despair
Severe pain predominately occurred at night
Henningsen MJ. Anaesthesia. 2018.
“It was like they poured boiling
water over my foot – and then
imagine that for two hours without
any decrease in pain”
“I woke up at midnight, and
then, it was like ... it burned and at
the same time I couldn’t feel my
toes.”
“When you’re in it, you must do
what’s necessary and then deal with
that [side effects] later.”
47. 13,897 CONSECUTIVE REGIONAL ANESTHETICS AT AN AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER
Malchow RJ. Pain Medicine. 2017
About 93% patients rate as
Good, Very Good, or Excellent
48. 13,897 CONSECUTIVE REGIONAL ANESTHETICS AT AN AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER
Malchow RJ. Pain Medicine. 2017
About 93% patients rate as
Good, Very Good, or Excellent
Leaking - 17%
Dislodgment - 3.7%
Pump/catheter issue - 0.9%
Skin reaction - 0.8%
50. SAFETY
Many prefer to keep catheter patients in
the hospital:
falls
leaking
dislodgment
block failure
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
51. SAFETY
Many prefer to keep catheter patients in
the hospital:
falls
leaking
dislodgment
block failure
“in the literature, an increase in catheter related
complications in the outpatient setting has never been shown”
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
52. SAFETY
Many prefer to keep catheter patients in
the hospital:
falls
leaking
dislodgment
block failure
“in the literature, an increase in catheter related
complications in the outpatient setting has never been shown”
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
55. COMPLICATIONS
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Minimal complications during insertion
Catheter failures - 0.5 - 26%
Dislodgements (up to 25%)
Leaking (much less with skin glue)
Catheter damage/retention
56. COMPLICATIONS
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Minimal complications during insertion
Catheter failures - 0.5 - 26%
Dislodgements (up to 25%)
Leaking (much less with skin glue)
Catheter damage/retention
LAST
Major Hematoma
Infection
Nerve injury
57. INFECTION
Catheter colonization vs
Inflammation of insertion site vs
Actual local or systemic infection
Nicolotti D. J Clin Anesth. 2016.
Bomberg H. Anesthesiology. 2018.
58. INFECTION
Catheter colonization vs
Inflammation of insertion site vs
Actual local or systemic infection
6-57%
Nicolotti D. J Clin Anesth. 2016.
Bomberg H. Anesthesiology. 2018.
59. INFECTION
Catheter colonization vs
Inflammation of insertion site vs
Actual local or systemic infection
6-57%
3-9%
Nicolotti D. J Clin Anesth. 2016.
Bomberg H. Anesthesiology. 2018.
60. INFECTION
Catheter colonization vs
Inflammation of insertion site vs
Actual local or systemic infection
6-57%
3-9%
0-3%
Nicolotti D. J Clin Anesth. 2016.
Bomberg H. Anesthesiology. 2018.
61. INFECTION
Catheter colonization vs
Inflammation of insertion site vs
Actual local or systemic infection
6-57%
3-9%
0-3%
Pathogen penetration is primary concern
breach in aseptic technique
contamination of lines (hub, filter, medication)
Nicolotti D. J Clin Anesth. 2016.
Bomberg H. Anesthesiology. 2018.
62. INFECTION
Catheter colonization vs
Inflammation of insertion site vs
Actual local or systemic infection
6-57%
3-9%
0-3%
Pathogen penetration is primary concern
breach in aseptic technique
contamination of lines (hub, filter, medication)
Nicolotti D. J Clin Anesth. 2016.
Bomberg H. Anesthesiology. 2018.
Risk Factors:
trauma drug abuse malignancy diabetes
chemotherapy DMARDs ICU immunosuppression
location (axillary, femoral, interscalene) duration (↑ after 48 hr)
63. INFECTION
Catheter colonization vs
Inflammation of insertion site vs
Actual local or systemic infection
6-57%
3-9%
0-3%
Pathogen penetration is primary concern
breach in aseptic technique
contamination of lines (hub, filter, medication)
Nicolotti D. J Clin Anesth. 2016.
Bomberg H. Anesthesiology. 2018.
Risk Factors:
trauma drug abuse malignancy diabetes
chemotherapy DMARDs ICU immunosuppression
location (axillary, femoral, interscalene) duration (↑ after 48 hr)
Only 31 out of 44,555
patients had severe infections
prompting surgical
intervention
Only 5 of these had minimal
external signs of infection
64. INFECTION PREVENTION
Nicolotti D. J Clin Anesth. 2016
RECOMMENDED REASONABLE DISCUSSED
Remove watches and jewelry
Bacterial filters for long-term
catheters
Medicated dressings (chlorhexidine
impregnated)
Hand wash (surgical scrub or
antiseptic alcohol solution)
Prevent catheter, hub, site, dressing
violations
Antibiotic prophylaxis
Cap/mask/sterile gloves Catheter tunneling
Skin prep - Chlorhexidine gluconate
with isopropyl alcohol
Proper drug preparation and
storage
Sterile draping
Avoid frequent catheter
disconnections
Sterile Field
Appropriate dressings
65. NERVE INJURY (PONS)
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Malchow RJ. Pain Medicine. 2017
ASRA Image Gallery. www.asra.com/education/image-gallery
Incidence about 5% at 6 months
0.3 - 0.7% at 11 months
66. NERVE INJURY (PONS)
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Malchow RJ. Pain Medicine. 2017
ASRA Image Gallery. www.asra.com/education/image-gallery
Incidence about 5% at 6 months
0.3 - 0.7% at 11 months
Etiology is often multifactorial
surgical
positioning
nerve block
tourniquet
Unclear how many would have PONS without blocks
67. NERVE INJURY (PONS)
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Malchow RJ. Pain Medicine. 2017
ASRA Image Gallery. www.asra.com/education/image-gallery
Incidence about 5% at 6 months
0.3 - 0.7% at 11 months
Our incidence was 2.3% out of 13,897 patients
Most were transient
7% (12) of these, lasted beyond 6 months and probably due to anesthesia
50% (6) of these were popliteal blocks
Etiology is often multifactorial
surgical
positioning
nerve block
tourniquet
Unclear how many would have PONS without blocks
68. NERVE INJURY (PONS)
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Malchow RJ. Pain Medicine. 2017
ASRA Image Gallery. www.asra.com/education/image-gallery
Incidence about 5% at 6 months
0.3 - 0.7% at 11 months
Our incidence was 2.3% out of 13,897 patients
Most were transient
7% (12) of these, lasted beyond 6 months and probably due to anesthesia
50% (6) of these were popliteal blocks
Etiology is often multifactorial
surgical
positioning
nerve block
tourniquet
Unclear how many would have PONS without blocks
69. NERVE INJURY (PONS)
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Malchow RJ. Pain Medicine. 2017
ASRA Image Gallery. www.asra.com/education/image-gallery
Incidence about 5% at 6 months
0.3 - 0.7% at 11 months
Our incidence was 2.3% out of 13,897 patients
Most were transient
7% (12) of these, lasted beyond 6 months and probably due to anesthesia
50% (6) of these were popliteal blocks
Etiology is often multifactorial
surgical
positioning
nerve block
tourniquet
Unclear how many would have PONS without blocks
ULTRASOUND DOESN’T MAKE A DIFFERENCE
70. NERVE INJURY (PONS)
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Malchow RJ. Pain Medicine. 2017
ASRA Image Gallery. www.asra.com/education/image-gallery
Incidence about 5% at 6 months
0.3 - 0.7% at 11 months
Our incidence was 2.3% out of 13,897 patients
Most were transient
7% (12) of these, lasted beyond 6 months and probably due to anesthesia
50% (6) of these were popliteal blocks
Etiology is often multifactorial
surgical
positioning
nerve block
tourniquet
Unclear how many would have PONS without blocks
ULTRASOUND DOESN’T MAKE A DIFFERENCE
CATHETERS AREN’T BETTER OR WORSE
91. STIMULATION?
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
U/S favored over stimulation
Higher success rate
Takes less time
Less procedure-related discomfort
Lower risk of vascular puncture
Less costly
stimulation may be benefit as adjunct
to U/S or for difficult to visualize targets
97. ADVICE FOR AMBULATORY SURGERY CATHETER SERVICE
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Goldberg SF. Adv Anesth. 2017
98. ADVICE FOR AMBULATORY SURGERY CATHETER SERVICE
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Goldberg SF. Adv Anesth. 2017
Patient Selection
•Must be able to understand instructions
•Have Support systems
•Opioid tolerant patients often benefit the most from catheters
•Careful of high risk patients (e.g. respiratory dz and brachial
plexus catheters)
99. ADVICE FOR AMBULATORY SURGERY CATHETER SERVICE
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Goldberg SF. Adv Anesth. 2017
Patient Selection
•Must be able to understand instructions
•Have Support systems
•Opioid tolerant patients often benefit the most from catheters
•Careful of high risk patients (e.g. respiratory dz and brachial
plexus catheters)
Detailed instructions
•Common problems - leaking, dislodgement, block failure
•Major problems - LAST, falls, limb protection
•When to go to ED
•Instructions on how to protect catheter
•How to remove catheter
100. ADVICE FOR AMBULATORY SURGERY CATHETER SERVICE
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Goldberg SF. Adv Anesth. 2017
Patient Selection
•Must be able to understand instructions
•Have Support systems
•Opioid tolerant patients often benefit the most from catheters
•Careful of high risk patients (e.g. respiratory dz and brachial
plexus catheters)
Detailed instructions
•Common problems - leaking, dislodgement, block failure
•Major problems - LAST, falls, limb protection
•When to go to ED
•Instructions on how to protect catheter
•How to remove catheter
Patient Followup and Contact
•24 hour contact number - for questions and problems
•Followup phone calls - until catheter removed
101. ADVICE FOR AMBULATORY SURGERY CATHETER SERVICE
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Goldberg SF. Adv Anesth. 2017
Patient Selection
•Must be able to understand instructions
•Have Support systems
•Opioid tolerant patients often benefit the most from catheters
•Careful of high risk patients (e.g. respiratory dz and brachial
plexus catheters)
Detailed instructions
•Common problems - leaking, dislodgement, block failure
•Major problems - LAST, falls, limb protection
•When to go to ED
•Instructions on how to protect catheter
•How to remove catheter
Patient Followup and Contact
•24 hour contact number - for questions and problems
•Followup phone calls - until catheter removed
In our experience, patient phone calls are
minimal…about a 4% incidence of calls.
102. IMPROVED PAIN CARE
• PATIENTS GO HOME EARLIER
• PAIN IS BETTER CONTROLLED
• SIDE EFFECTS ARE MINIMIZED
• PATIENTS ARE MORE SATISFIED
A T - H O M E P A I N C O N T R O L
RECOVER WITH MANAGED PAIN IN YOUR OWN HOME
You are receiving a relatively new method of pain control, called
Continuous Regional Analgesia. A soft catheter lies near the nerves which
provide sensation to all or part of the surgical site, allowing local anesthetics
to numb the area and reduce pain. This provides very good pain control,
minimizes side effects such as constipation and drowsiness that are often
caused by traditional narcotic pain medications, and improves function, re-
covery, and overall patient satisfaction.
HOW IT WORKS
The type of pump you receive and how it operates will be explained to you
when you are discharged. There may be some patient controls on the pump
with which you will need to be familiar. All pumps, whether balloon-type or
battery-operated, are designed to rest in a pouch where it is connected to
the pain catheter. This allows you to perform normal daily activities such as
walking. The pump administers a small amount of local anesthetic medicine
through the catheter on a regular basis
— about a teaspoon or two an hour.
This medicine helps to decrease the
pain by partially numbing the area
where you had surgery. The idea is not
to completely numb the area, but to
decrease the pain you feel. Most likely,
both muscle strength and pain sensa-
tion will be decreased in the area to
some degree. If the area is completely
numb, and you have no strength in the
affected area, we may be able to re-
store some of your function without
pain by decreasing the rate of infusion.
Likewise, if the pain is too great, we
can usually increase the rate of
infusion.
For your safety, do not operate a vehicle or machinery with a pain
catheter in place. In addition, protect the numb extremity from injury by
using a sling, crutches, padding, knee immobilizer or other device while the
pain catheter is in place.
MANAGING YOUR PAIN CONTROL
A nurse or physician will contact you daily after your
discharge to follow up on your pain, nausea, itching,
and medication management. You will be asked to
rate your pain on a scale from 0-10, with “0” being
no pain and “10” being the worst pain imaginable. If
you experience mild to moderate pain, you may
increase the rate by 2ml per hour every 1-2 hours,
or you may take conventional pain medication by
mouth (such as Motrin, Percocet). If you experience
severe pain, it is safe for you to maximize your rate
at 14ml/hr for 1-3 hours until you are more comfort-
able, and then gradually decrease your rate to
6-10ml/hr as needed. Set the pump at only even
rates (for example, 6 ml per hour) since the pump
will not run with the dial set between even numbers
(for example, between 4 and 6 ml per hour).
During your follow-up call, you will also be asked if
you have the following symptoms: numb lips, ringing
in the ears, metal taste in the mouth, sudden in-
crease in anxiety, dizziness, sudden tiredness and
shortness of breath. If you have any of these symp-
toms or any other concerns at any time before, or
after the hospital contacts you, simply close the
clamp on the pump tubing (or turn the pump off) and
notify your anesthesiologist immediately. Please do
not disconnect the pump, leaving the catheter open
and exposed.
You will be asked if your catheter is secure, if the
clamp is open, if there is any pain, swelling, redness
at the catheter site, if the pump is delivering medica-
tion, and approximately how much medication is left
in the pump.
REMOVING THE CATHETER
You will be instructed at discharge and again by
phone on how to remove the catheter. It should
slide out easily with gentle pulling. There should not
be any electric, shooting pain in the same extremity
as you pull out the catheter. If there is electric, radi-
ating pain, stop pulling the catheter and contact the
anesthesiologist. Examine the blue tip of the cathe-
ter to make sure it is intact.
129. LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE
Improved analgesia against saline - wound infiltration
Equivocal against plain bupivacaine
(10/12 RCTs - no advantage for primary analgesic outcome)
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Abildgard JT, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017
130. LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE
Improved analgesia against saline - wound infiltration
Equivocal against plain bupivacaine
(10/12 RCTs - no advantage for primary analgesic outcome)
No blinded RCTs comparing CPNB to LB
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Abildgard JT, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017
131. LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE
Improved analgesia against saline - wound infiltration
Equivocal against plain bupivacaine
(10/12 RCTs - no advantage for primary analgesic outcome)
No blinded RCTs comparing CPNB to LB
One study - FNB with LB - 72 hrs analgesia
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Abildgard JT, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017
132. LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE
Improved analgesia against saline - wound infiltration
Equivocal against plain bupivacaine
(10/12 RCTs - no advantage for primary analgesic outcome)
No blinded RCTs comparing CPNB to LB
One study - FNB with LB - 72 hrs analgesia
Recent approval for ISB block
based on a phase 3 study comparing it to placebo
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Abildgard JT, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017
133. LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE
Improved analgesia against saline - wound infiltration
Equivocal against plain bupivacaine
(10/12 RCTs - no advantage for primary analgesic outcome)
No blinded RCTs comparing CPNB to LB
One study - FNB with LB - 72 hrs analgesia
Recent approval for ISB block
based on a phase 3 study comparing it to placebo
One study showed better results with CPNB vs LB for ISB
VAS scores in the PACU (1.91 vs 7.25)
VAS scores on POD0 (3.20 vs 4.99)
Total opioid consumption (91.70 vs 189.50)
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Abildgard JT, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017
138. PERCUTANEOUS NERVE
STIMULATION
Unclear mechanism
Possible Gate-control theory
Ideally - no sensory, proprioception, or motor
deficits
No risk of LAST or leakage
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Gabriel RA. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2018
139. PERCUTANEOUS NERVE
STIMULATION
Unclear mechanism
Possible Gate-control theory
Ideally - no sensory, proprioception, or motor
deficits
No risk of LAST or leakage
Can be left in for long periods of time (6 weeks+)
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Gabriel RA. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2018
140. PERCUTANEOUS NERVE
STIMULATION
Unclear mechanism
Possible Gate-control theory
Ideally - no sensory, proprioception, or motor
deficits
No risk of LAST or leakage
Can be left in for long periods of time (6 weeks+)
???Does it work
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Gabriel RA. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2018
142. CRYO-ABLATION
Cold temperatures generated at the tip of probe
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Abildgard JT, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Gabriel RA. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2018
143. CRYO-ABLATION
Cold temperatures generated at the tip of probe
Wallerian degeneration of nerve (reversible?)
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Abildgard JT, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Gabriel RA. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2018
144. CRYO-ABLATION
Cold temperatures generated at the tip of probe
Wallerian degeneration of nerve (reversible?)
Inhibits future transmission of efferent signals
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Abildgard JT, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Gabriel RA. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2018
145. CRYO-ABLATION
Cold temperatures generated at the tip of probe
Wallerian degeneration of nerve (reversible?)
Inhibits future transmission of efferent signals
Ideally for non-motor nerves only
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Abildgard JT, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Gabriel RA. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2018
146. CRYO-ABLATION
Cold temperatures generated at the tip of probe
Wallerian degeneration of nerve (reversible?)
Inhibits future transmission of efferent signals
Ideally for non-motor nerves only
Unpredictable duration of actions (weeks…. months)
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Abildgard JT, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Gabriel RA. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2018
147. CRYO-ABLATION
Cold temperatures generated at the tip of probe
Wallerian degeneration of nerve (reversible?)
Inhibits future transmission of efferent signals
Ideally for non-motor nerves only
Unpredictable duration of actions (weeks…. months)
Examples:
iliac crest harvesting
cutaneous and patellar nerves for TKR
superficial nerves for thumb surgery
suprascapular nerve for rotator cuff repair
digit/limb amputations
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Abildgard JT, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017
Ilfeld BM. Anesth Analg. 2017
Gabriel RA. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2018
151. OBJECTIVES
01Value of Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks over Single Shot Blocks
02Complications related to CPNB and Pitfalls to avoid
152. OBJECTIVES
01Value of Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks over Single Shot Blocks
02Complications related to CPNB and Pitfalls to avoid
153. OBJECTIVES
01Value of Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks over Single Shot Blocks
02Complications related to CPNB and Pitfalls to avoid
03Tips for an Ambulatory Catheter Management Program
154. OBJECTIVES
01Value of Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks over Single Shot Blocks
02Complications related to CPNB and Pitfalls to avoid
03Tips for an Ambulatory Catheter Management Program
155. OBJECTIVES
01Value of Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks over Single Shot Blocks
02Complications related to CPNB and Pitfalls to avoid
03Tips for an Ambulatory Catheter Management Program
04Alternatives and Future Directions
156. OBJECTIVES
01Value of Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks over Single Shot Blocks
02Complications related to CPNB and Pitfalls to avoid
03Tips for an Ambulatory Catheter Management Program
04Alternatives and Future Directions
161. INSPIRATIONWhat was the most inspiring thing I’ve ever said to you?…”Don’t be an idiot.” Changed my life.
Whenever I’m about to do something, I think “would an idiot do that?”… and if they would, I do not do that thing.