Puppet camp2021 testing modules and controlrepo

Puppet Code testing

Modules vs. Control-Repo
Martin Alfke - example42 GmbH

PuppetCamp April 15, 2021
1

Puppet Code Testing - Modules vs. Control-Repo - PuppetCamp 2021 - Martin Alfke © example42 GmbH
Puppet since 2009, Puppet Trainer since
2011, Puppet Certified Consultant since 2015

CEO & Co-Founder example42 GmbH

tuxmea (Twitter, GitHub, Slack)

Puppet Consulting, Training and
Development
MartinAlfke
2

Why testing?
3
Image: tatlin

Why testing?
4
Can Puppet compiler parse your
code?

Can you upgrade to a newer Puppet
version?

Does the refactoring accidentally
change anything?
Image: tatlin

Why testing?
5
What to use?

- puppet-lint

- rspec-puppet

- PDK

- OnceOver

- Beaker

- Litmus

- serverspec

- https://voxpupuli.org/plugins/
Image: tatlin

Why testing?
6
But,

I only want to write Puppet code!

And now I must learn testing?

Let’s choose the most simple to use
solution!
Image: tatlin

Why testing?
7
Which tests to run?

- Lint tests - check style guide

- Unit tests - check catalog

- Acceptance tests - check system
Image: tatlin

Testing Modules
8
Image: tatlin

Where do you want to run the test?

On your workstation (Windows, Mac
OS, Linux)

Within an automated CI pipeline (Linux
Shell, Container)
Testing Modules
9
Image: tatlin

Testing Modules
10
Image: tatlin
PDK:

- easy to use

- all bundled

- different Puppet version tests possible

pdk validate --puppet-version=7

Standalone Library (or Component)
Modules, not roles & profiles

Use PDK (Puppet Development Kit) to
generate module, classes, …

- pdk new module

- pdk new class, defined_type, fact,
function, provider, task

- pdk convert, update
Testing Modules
11
Image: tatlin

Testing Modules
12
Image: tatlin
Use PDK (Puppet Development Kit) for
testing:

- pdk validate

- pdk test unit

Testing Modules
13
Image: tatlin
Add dependencies like stdlib or inifile
to .fixtures.yml

Get dependencies from forge or git
(upstream or local)

Testing Modules
14
Image: tatlin
You want to change the default
behaviour?

Check the pdk-template git repo and
use the possibility to configure PDK
(.sync.yml)

Run pdk update afterwards.

Testing Modules
15
Image: tatlin
PDK uses Puppet version and
supported OS from metadata.json

But how to proceed with control-repo?

Testing Control-Repo - PDK
16
Image: tatlin

Puppet Code Testing - Modules vs. Control-Repo - PuppetCamp 2021 - Martin Alfke © example42 GmbH 17
Syntax Tests:

Role and profile modules must be generated
using PDK

pushd site/profile && pdk validate && popd

pushd site/role && pdk validate && popd

Image: tatlin

Using PDK for Unit Testing

Many dependencies (upstream or library
modules) like stdlib, inifile, core modules, ...

You want to use your control-repo Hiera config
and data

You want to use your manifests/site.pp
Image: tatlin

Using PDK for Unit Testing

- profile and role module must be in PDK
format (use pdk convert on existing profile
and role modules)

- modules from Puppetfile must be installed
locally (r10k puppetfile install)
Image: tatlin

Using PDK - solution

One needs:

- .fixtures.yml

- spec/spec_helper_local.rb
Image: tatlin

Using PDK on profile module
-.fixtures.yml

# site/profile/.fixtures.yml

---

fixtures:

symlinks:

profile: "#{source_dir}"

../r10k: ‘../../../../modules'
Using PDK on role module
-.fixtures.yml

# site/role/.fixtures.yml

---

fixtures:

symlinks:

role: "#{source_dir}"

profile: "#{source_dir}/../profile"

../r10k: ‘../../../../modules'

Using PDK - spec/spec_helper_local.rb

# site/{role|profile}/spec/spec_helper_local.rb

fixture_path = File.expand_path(File.join(__FILE__, '..', 'fixtures'))

RSpec.configure do |c|

c.module_path = File.join(fixture_path, 'modules') + ':' + File.join(fixture_path, ‘r10k')

c.manifest_dir = File.join(fixture_path, ‘../../../../manifests’)

c.manifest = File.join(fixture_path, ‘../../../../manifests/site.pp’)

c.hiera_config = File.join(fixture_path, '../../../../hiera.yaml')

end
Image: tatlin

Run your control-repo tests:

r10k puppetfile install

pushd site/profile && pdk test unit && popd

pushd site/role && pdk test unit && popd

Image: tatlin

Using PDK for Acceptance Testing

PDK does not officially support acceptance
testing.

Yes, PDK ships beaker and litmus

- pdk bundle exec rake -T

pdk bundle: not officially supported!

Image: tatlin

How to deal with role or profile classes which
are designed for a specific OS only?

Reminder: PDK uses supported OS from
metadata.json

Many adoptions required.

Is there a more simple way?
Image: tatlin

Testing Control-Repo - OnceOver
26
Image: tatlin

https://github.com/dylanratcliffe/onceover

Specially created to test Puppet control-repo

Separation of concerns: tests for library
modules vs. tests for control-repo

Run syntax, unit and acceptance tests … and
one more thing ;-)
Image: tatlin

Delivered as Ruby GEM:

gem install onceover onceover-codequality

Or: Gemfile: gem ‘onceover’

gem ‘onceover-codequality’

Initialize OnceOver on your control-repo:
onceover init

Run syntax tests: onceover run codequality
Image: tatlin

onceover run codequality

INFO

-> Running Code Quality tests

INFO

-> Checking Puppetfile...

INFO

-> ...OK

INFO

-> Checking puppet-syntax rake task…

INFO

-> ...OK

WARN

-> Please install python and pyyaml for enhanced YAML validation (pip install pyyam

INFO

-> Checking lint in manifests...

INFO

-> ...OK

INFO

-> Checking lint in site...

spec/onceover.yaml

- add classes and nodes,

- create class_groups and node_groups,

- build your test_matrix

Describe the unit tests in spec/classes/
<class>_spec.rb
Image: tatlin

# spec/onceover.yaml

classes:

- role::base

nodes:

- CentOS-7.0-64

class_groups:

all_classes:

- role::base

…
# spec/onceover.yaml continued

…

node_groups:

testnodes:

- CentOS-7.0-64

test_matrix:

- all_nodes:

classes: 'role::base'

tests: 'spec'

onceover run spec

INFO

-> Using Puppetfile ‘…/control-repo/.onceover/etc/puppetlabs/code/
environments/production/Puppetfile’

INFO

-> Updating module …/control-repo/.onceover/etc/puppetlabs/code/
environments/production/modules/yumrepo_core

…

role::base: P P P P

Acceptance Tests are configures in spec/
acceptance/<class>_spec.rb

Nodesets are configured in spec/acceptance/
nodesets/onceover-nodes.yaml

Hint: onceover needs beaker and will print a
complaint about beaker deprecation.

One more thing!
Image: tatlin

OnceOver Catalog diff

gem ‘onceover-octocatalog-diff’

onceover run diff --from <branch> --to <branch>
Image: tatlin

Summary
35
Image: tatlin

Summary
36
Image: tatlin
Testing is important but has a learning
curve!

Syntax and unit tests are essential and
easy to do

Acceptance tests are useful, but
harder to do

Summary
37
Image: tatlin
Move from simple to harder.

Start using PDK.

Learn rspec-puppet.

Move to OnceOver for contro-repo testing.

Build an infrastructure for acceptance testing.

Summary
38
Image: tatlin
PDK uses OS information from a modules
metadata.json.

Different tests for different OS needs adoption of spec
tests.

OnceOver lets you build a test matrix regarding
classes and OS to tests.

Summary
39
Image: tatlin
Check the possibilities of your infrastructure and
your test requirements.

VM tests are possible in Docker, VMware,
Vagrant, AWS, …

https://github.com/voxpupuli/beaker/blob/master/
docs/how_to/hypervisors/README.md

https://github.com/puppetlabs/provision

Please take care!
40
We are living in difficult times.

Cities and towns need diversity.

Diversity is provided by small businesses.

Support your local, small, owner or family run
businesses.

Stay healthy and take care!

Puppet Code testing

Modules vs. Control-Repo
Q&A

Martin Alfke - example42 GmbH

Puppet camp2021 testing modules and controlrepo

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (10)

Ähnlich wie Puppet camp2021 testing modules and controlrepo

Ähnlich wie Puppet camp2021 testing modules and controlrepo (20)

Mehr von Puppet

Mehr von Puppet (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Puppet camp2021 testing modules and controlrepo