Pipeline spans are susceptible to vortex induced vibration, slugging, and flow induced vibration leading to accelerated fatigue of the pipeline.
This presentation shows an example return on investment of pipeline span monitoring and flow rate optimization through the use of motion monitoring.
Utilizing the monitored data, operators are able to calibrate their models and reduce span mitigation costs.
4. www.pulse-monitoring.com
Pipeline Span Monitoring
• Span- unsupported areas of subsea pipeline
• Two types of span that can cause integrity concerns:
– Free spans
– Pipeline sleepers
• Potential fatigue damage from VIV, FIV and slugging
Introduction
D
U
D
e
eS
W1 W2
U
D
U
D
e
U
Soil
Onset of scour Tunnel erosion Lee-wake erosion Equilibrium stage
5. www.pulse-monitoring.com
Pipeline Free Spans
Reducing Operational Costs: Example
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
1
2
3
2*|FFT|ofx-acc.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
1
2
3
2*|FFT|ofy-acc.
frequency [Hz]
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
0
1
2
x 10
-3
2*|FFT|wofx-acc.
LOGGER NO. T14 - PERIOD NO. 1737
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
0
1
2
x 10
-3
2*|FFT|wofy-acc.
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
0
1
2
x 10
-3
2*|FFT|wofz-acc.
frequency [Hz]
• Client spends approximately $500K per year on
mitigation costs of pipeline spans for a single
pipeline
• Current model suggests mitigation measures
must be taken on any unsupported span over
20 ft.
• Monitoring chosen to measure VIV response
and current data to calibrate model.
• Little to no evidence of VIV was found to be
present in either the cross-flow or in-line
direction increasing acceptable span length to
35 ft.
Typical VIV Spectrum
Monitored Data
8. www.pulse-monitoring.com
Pipeline Free Span Monitoring
Summary
• Pipeline free spans can experience
accelerated fatigue due to VIV
• Pipeline operators are spending
millions of dollars mitigating span
issues with sand bags, grouting, etc.
• Span monitoring provides data to
reduce conservatism in design and
reduce mitigation costs by extending
critical span length and reducing risk