Intel processor-powered Lenovo ThinkPad 11e Chromebook for education - Infographic

•

0 gefällt mir•425 views

The longer students have to wait on devices to open apps or documents, the more likely they can become distracted or frustrated. These longer wait times can mean more time to complete assignments in the classroom or at home. For teachers, this can mean students that are less engaged in the classroom. Which Chromebook model is the better choice for students? We put two Chromebook models to the test, and found the Intel processor-powered Lenovo ThinkPad 11e Chromebook delivered less waiting than the ARM processor-based Samsung Chromebook 2 and more frames per second while rendering an anatomy simulation. The Intel processor-powered Lenovo ThinkPad 11e Chromebook did so without sacrificing battery life, with both systems lasting more than 9 hours unplugged while browsing the Internet. This report card has good news: With the Intel processor-powered Lenovo ThinkPad 11e Chromebook, students can wait less and have more time for learning.

Technologie

to read a textbook
and take notes online
to create an English
presentation
to do math
homework online
to team up
in science class
Better performance
without sacrificing
battery life
35% more frames per second
while rendering an anatomy simulation
10.1%
LESS WAITING
9.2%
LESS WAITING
2.5%
LESS WAITING
11.9%
LESS WAITING
Principled
Technologies®
Copyright 2014 Principled Technologies, Inc. Based on “Intel
processor-powered Lenovo ThinkPad 11e Chromebook for
education,” a Principled Technologies Report, July 2014.
Principled Technologies®
is a registered trademark of
Principled Technologies, Inc. All other product names are
the trademarks of their respective owners.
Open existing
spreadsheet in
Google Sheets
Open new
Google Doc
Open PhET
Build an Atom
simulator
Open Useful
Periodic Table app
Open
YouTube
Play Crash
Course video
on Chromecast
IntelARM
Power on
Open
GeoGebra app
Open existing
Google doc
Open 3D
model in Design
Something app
Open
parallel lines
assessment
in CK-12
Open
YouTube
Play TED-Ed
video
IntelARM
Power on
Open Kno
textbook
Open new
Google doc
Search
Wikipedia
Open
BioDigital
Human app
Play Khan
Academy video
Open New
York Times app
IntelARM
Power on
Open
Google Keep
Search
Wikipedia
Open new
presentation in
Google Slides
Open
Planetarium app
Open
Google Maps
Enter Google
Street View
Open
existing
presentation
in Google
Slides
IntelARM
Intel - 9hrs 1min
ARM - 9hrs 7mins
Get all the facts in the full report at
http://facts.pt/1pdu9YX
Intel
ARM
27 fps
20 fps
Less waiting, more learning.
The Intel®
processor-powered Lenovo®
ThinkPad®
11e
Chromebook™
was faster than the ARM®
-based model in
every scenario we tested, and delivered more frames
per second while rendering an anatomy simulation.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Replacing your legacy VDI servers with a new Intel Xeon processor E5-2650 v3-powered Dell PowerEdge FX2 solution using VMware Virtual SAN can be a great boon for your enterprise. In the Principled Technologies (PT) labs, this space-efficient, affordable solution outperformed a legacy server and traditional SAN VSAN by offering 72 percent greater VDI users. Additionally, it achieved greater performance while using 91 percent less space and at a cost of only $176.52 per user. By supporting more users, saving space, and its affordability, an upgrade to the Intel-powered Dell PowerEdge FX2 solution using VMware Virtual SAN can be a wise move when replacing your aging, older infrastructure.

VDI performance comparison: Dell PowerEdge FX2 and FC430 servers with VMware ...

Principled Technologies

Chromebook Overview

Desiree Caskey

Intel processor-powered Lenovo ThinkPad 11e Chromebook for education

Principled Technologies

Chromebook Classroom - TCEA 2014 (W. Chun & L. Anderson)

wesley chun

Chromebook在數位學習上的應用

Simon Su

Chromebooks are a faster and fairly inexpensive computer that start up in less than 7 seconds, offer thousands of web-based apps, have built-in virus protection, and can easily synchronization to Google’s cloud and burgeoning services infrastructure. In this webinar:  Learn Chromebook specifications.  Understand how to use a Chromebook.  Discover how to install Linux and dual boot.  Determine if Chromebooks are a good fit for your library.

Introducing Chromebooks

Chad Mairn

Google chrome os chromebook

Prashant Raj

Chromebook intro for hey u

Michelle Harris

Robbins eob9 inst_ppt_13

leng81287

Building Reading and Writing Fluency the Chrome Way - TCEA 2016

Diana Benner

Get the most out of your Chromebook! This session will harness your collaboration and super creation power by building strong foundational skills. Learn how the Chrome web browser, Chrome Apps, and extensions can create limitless possibilities for your students in the areas of reading, writing, and thinking. Conquer your arch enemy by utilizing your full Chromebook potential to help students read and write purposefully and to prepare them for higher-order thinking skills.

Reading, Writing, & Thinking: Become A Chromebook Superhero

Diana Benner

Andere mochten auch (11)

VDI performance comparison: Dell PowerEdge FX2 and FC430 servers with VMware ...

Chromebook Overview

Intel processor-powered Lenovo ThinkPad 11e Chromebook for education

Chromebook Classroom - TCEA 2014 (W. Chun & L. Anderson)

Chromebook在數位學習上的應用

Introducing Chromebooks

Google chrome os chromebook

Chromebook intro for hey u

Robbins eob9 inst_ppt_13

Building Reading and Writing Fluency the Chrome Way - TCEA 2016

Reading, Writing, & Thinking: Become A Chromebook Superhero

Mehr von Principled Technologies

Diving into the world of GenAI has the potential to yield a great many benefits for your organization, but it first requires consideration for how best to implement those GenAI workloads. Whether your AI goals are to create a chatbot for online visitors, generate marketing materials, aid troubleshooting, or something else, implementing an AI solution requires careful planning and decision-making. A major decision is whether to host GenAI in the cloud or keep your data on premises. Traditional on-premises solutions can provide superior security and control, a substantial concern when dealing with large amounts of potentially sensitive data. But will supporting a GenAI solution on site be a drain on an organization’s IT budget? In our research, we found that the value proposition is just the opposite: Hosting GenAI workloads on premises, either in a traditional Dell solution or using a managed Dell APEX pay-per-use solution, could significantly lower your GenAI costs over 3 years compared to hosting these workloads in the cloud. In fact, we found that a comparable AWS SageMaker solution would cost up to 3.8 times as much and an Azure ML solution would cost up to 3.6 times as much as GenAI on a Dell APEX pay-per-use solution. These results show that organizations looking to implement GenAI and reap the business benefits to come can find many advantages in an on-premises Dell solution, whether they opt to purchase and manage it themselves or choose a subscription-based Dell APEX pay-per-use solution. Choosing an on-premises Dell solution could save your organization significantly over hosting GenAI in the cloud, while giving you control over the security and privacy of your data as well as any updates and changes to the environment, and while ensuring your environment is managed consistently.

Investing in GenAI: Cost‑benefit analysis of Dell on‑premises deployments vs....

Principled Technologies

The 4th Generation Intel Xeon Scalable processor‑powered solution deployed in less than two hours and ran a generative AI workload effectively Conclusion The appeal of incorporating GenAI into your organization’s operations is likely great. Getting started with an efficient solution for your next LLM workload or application can seem daunting because of the changing hardware and software landscape, but Dell APEX Cloud Platform for Red Hat OpenShift powered by 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors could provide the solution you need. We started with a Dell Validated Design as a reference, and then went on to modify the deployment as necessary for our Llama 2 workload. The Dell APEX Cloud Platform for Red Hat OpenShift solution worked well for our LLM, and by using this deployment guide in conjunction with numerous Dell documents and some flexibility, you could be well on your way to innovating your next GenAI breakthrough.

Dell APEX Cloud Platform for Red Hat OpenShift: An easily deployable and powe...

Principled Technologies

Upgrade your cloud infrastructure with Dell PowerEdge R760 servers and VMware...

Principled Technologies

Compared to a cluster of PowerEdge R750 servers running VMware Cloud Foundation 4.5 If your company is struggling with underperforming infrastructure, upgrading to 16th Generation Dell PowerEdge servers running VCF 5.1 could be just what you need to handle more database throughput and reduce vSAN latencies. As an additional benefit to IT admins, we also found that the embedded VMware Aria Operation adapter provided useful infrastructure insights.

Upgrade your cloud infrastructure with Dell PowerEdge R760 servers and VMware...

Principled Technologies

Three AMD EPYC processor-based two-processor solutions outshined comparable Intel Xeon Scalable processor-based solutions by handling more Redis workload transactions and requests while consuming less power Conclusion Performance and energy efficiency are significant factors in processor selection for servers running data-intensive workloads, such as Redis. We compared the Redis performance and energy consumption of a server cluster in three AMD EPYC two-processor configurations against that of a server cluster in two Intel Xeon Scalable two-processor configurations. In each of our three test scenarios, the server cluster backed by AMD EPYC processors outperformed the server cluster backed by Intel Xeon Scalable processors. In addition, one of the AMD EPYC processor-based clusters consumed 20 percent less power than its Intel Xeon Scalable processor-based counterpart. Combining these measurements gave us power efficiency metrics that demonstrate how valuable AMD EPYC processor-based servers could be—you could see better performance per watt with these AMD EPYC processor-based server clusters and potentially get more from your Redis or other data intensive applications and workloads while reducing data center power costs.

Realize 2.1X the performance with 20% less power with AMD EPYC processor-back...

Principled Technologies

We deployed this modern environment, then migrated database VMs from legacy servers and saw performance improvements that support consolidation Conclusion If your organization’s transactional databases are running on gear that is several years old, you have much to gain by upgrading to modern servers with new processors and networking components and an OpenShift environment. In our testing, a modern OpenShift environment with a cluster of three Dell PowerEdge R7615 servers with 4th Generation AMD EPYC processors and high-speed 100Gb Broadcom NICs outperformed a legacy environment with MySQL VMs running on a cluster of three Dell PowerEdge R7515 servers with 3rd Generation AMD EPYC processors and 25Gb Broadcom NICs. We also easily migrated a VM from the legacy environment to the modern environment, with only a few steps required to set up and less than ten minutes of hands-on time. The performance advantage of the modern servers would allow a company to reduce the number of servers necessary to perform a given amount of database work, thus lowering operational expenditures such as power and cooling and IT staff time for maintenance. The high-speed 100Gb Broadcom NICs in this solution also give companies better network performance and networking capacity to grow as they embrace emerging technologies such as AI that put great demands on networks.

Improve performance and gain room to grow by easily migrating to a modern Ope...

Principled Technologies

With more memory available, system performance of three Dell devices increased, which can translate to a better user experience Conclusion When your system has plenty of RAM to meet your needs, you can efficiently access the applications and data you need to finish projects and to-do lists without sacrificing time and focus. Our test results show that with more memory available, three Dell PCs delivered better performance and took less time to complete the Procyon Office Productivity benchmark. These advantages translate to users being able to complete workflows more quickly and multitask more easily. Whether you need the mobility of the Latitude 5440, the creative capabilities of the Precision 3470, or the high performance of the OptiPlex Tower Plus 7010, configuring your system with more RAM can help keep processes running smoothly, enabling you to do more without compromising performance.

Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity

Principled Technologies

A Principled Technologies deployment guide Conclusion Deploying VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdge servers brings together critical virtualization capabilities and high-performing hardware infrastructure. Relying on our hands-on experience, this deployment guide offers a comprehensive roadmap that can guide your organization through the seamless integration of advanced VMware cloud solutions with the performance and reliability of Dell PowerEdge servers. In addition to the deployment efficiency, the Cloud Foundation 5.1 and PowerEdge solution delivered strong performance while running a MySQL database workload. By leveraging VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 and PowerEdge servers, you could help your organization embrace cloud computing with confidence, potentially unlocking a new level of agility, scalability, and efficiency in your data center operations.

Deploy with confidence: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdg...

Principled Technologies

Compared to a cluster of PowerEdge R750 servers running VMware Cloud Foundation 4.5 Conclusion If your company is struggling with underperforming infrastructure, upgrading to 16th Generation Dell PowerEdge servers running VCF 5.1 could be just what you need to handle more database throughput and reduce vSAN latencies. We found that a Dell PowerEdge R760 server cluster running VCF 5.1 processed over 78 percent more TPM and 79 percent more NOPM than a Dell PowerEdge R750 server cluster running VCF 4.5. It’s also worth noting that the PowerEdge R750 cluster bottlenecked on vSAN storage, with max write latency at 8.9ms. For reference, the PowerEdge R760 cluster clocked in at 3.8ms max write latency. This higher latency is due in part to the single disk group per host on the moderately configured PowerEdge R750 cluster, while the better-configured PowerEdge R760 cluster supported four disk groups per host. As an additional benefit to IT admins, we also found that the embedded VMware Aria Operation adapter provided useful infrastructure insights.

Upgrade your cloud infrastructure with Dell PowerEdge R760 servers and VMware...

Principled Technologies

A comparison of security features in Dell, HP, and Lenovo PC systems

Principled Technologies

Compared to the Supermicro management portfolio Conclusion Choosing a vendor for server purchases is about more than just the hardware platform. Decision-makers must also consider more long-term concerns, including system/data security, energy efficiency, and ease of management. These concerns make the systems management tools a vendor offers as important as the hardware. We investigated the features and capabilities of server management tools from Dell and Supermicro, comparing Dell iDRAC9 against Supermicro IPMI for embedded server management and Dell OpenManage Enterprise and CloudIQ against Supermicro Server Manager for one-to-many device and console management and monitoring. We found that the Dell management tools provided more comprehensive security, sustainability, and management/monitoring features and capabilities than Supermicro servers did. In addition, Dell tools automated more tasks to ease server management, resulting in significant time savings for administrators versus having to do the same tasks manually with Supermicro tools. When making a server purchase, a vendor’s associated management products are critical to protect data, support a more sustainable environment, and to ease the maintenance of systems. Our tests and research showed that the Dell management portfolio for PowerEdge servers offered more features to help organizations meet these goals than the comparable Supermicro management products.

Increase security, sustainability, and efficiency with robust Dell server man...

Principled Technologies

Increase security, sustainability, and efficiency with robust Dell server man...

Principled Technologies

In our tests, Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS outperformed similarly configured solutions from Vendor A, achieving more IOPS, better throughput, and more consistent performance on both NVMe-supported configurations and configurations backed by Elastic Block Store (EBS) alone. Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS supports a full NVMe backed configuration, but Vendor A doesn’t—its solution uses EBS for storage capacity and NVMe as an extended read cache—which means APEX Block Storage for AWS can deliver faster storage performance.

Scale up your storage with higher-performing Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS ...

Principled Technologies

Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS offered stronger and more consistent storage performance for better business agility than a Vendor A solution Conclusion Enterprises desiring the flexibility and convenience of the cloud for their block storage workloads can find fast-performing solutions with the enterprise storage features they’re used to in on-premises infrastructure by selecting Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS. Our hands-on tests showed that compared to the Vendor A solution, Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS offered stronger, more consistent storage performance in both NVMe-supported and EBS-backed configurations. Using NVMe-supported configurations, Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS achieved 4.7x the random read IOPS and 5.1x the throughput on sequential read operations per node vs. Vendor A. In our EBS-backed comparison, Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS offered 2.2x the throughput per node on sequential read operations vs. Vendor A. Plus, the ability to scale beyond three nodes—up to 512 storage nodes with capacity of up to 8 PBs—enables Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS to help ensure performance and capacity as your team plans for the future.

Scale up your storage with higher-performing Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS

Principled Technologies

We compared CPU performance and noise output of an HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation in High Performance Mode to Dell Precision 3660 and 5860 tower workstations in optimized performance modes Conclusion HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation users can change the BIOS settings to dial in the performance mode that best suits their needs: High Performance Mode, Performance Mode, or Quiet Mode. In good news for both creative and technical professionals, we found that an Intel Core i9-13900 processor-powered HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation set to High Performance mode received higher CPU-based benchmark scores than both a similarly configured Dell Precision 3660 and a Dell Precision 5860 equipped with an Intel Xeon w5-2455x processor. Plus, the HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation was quieter while running CPU-intensive Cinebench 2024 and SPECapc for Solidworks 2022 workloads than both Dell Precision tower workstations. This means HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation users who prize performance over everything else can do so without sacrificing a quiet workspace.

Get in and stay in the productivity zone with the HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation

Principled Technologies

In our PostgreSQL tests, R7i instances boosted performance over R6i instances with previous-gen processors If you use the open-source PostgreSQL database to run your critical business operations, you have many cloud options from which to choose. While many of these instances can do the job, some can deliver stronger performance, which can mean getting a greater return on your cloud investment. We conducted hands-on testing with the HammerDB TPROC-C benchmark to see how the PostgreSQL performance of Amazon EC2 R7i instances, enabled by 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors, stacked up to that of R6i instances with previous-generation processors. We learned that small, medium-sized, and large R7i instances with the newer processors delivered better OLTP performance, with improvements as high as 13.8 percent. By choosing the R7i instances, your organization has the potential to support more users, deliver a better experience to those users, and even lower your cloud operating expenditures by requiring fewer instances to get the job done.

Open up new possibilities with higher transactional database performance from...

Principled Technologies

Migrating from Azure Database for MySQL – Single Server to a Flexible Server solution was quick and provided performance and cost benefits Don’t put off migrating your databases from Azure Database for MySQL – Single Server until the last minute—which is September 2024, when the service will end. Our hands-on testing shows that moving to Azure Database for MySQL – Flexible Server is a simple process that can actually improve your overall database performance and offer better value. With as much as 117 percent better OLTP performance on sysbench and up to 266 percent better performance per dollar, migrating your database to Azure Database for MySQL – Flexible Server with AMD EPYC processors can help you serve more database users and potentially improve your operating budget compared to the expiring Single Server option.

Improving database performance and value with an easy migration to Azure Data...

Principled Technologies

Realize better value and performance migrating from Azure Database for Postgr...

Principled Technologies

It’s time to move your databases from Azure Database for PostgreSQL – Single Server instances now, before March 2025 when Microsoft Azure retires the service. Our hands-on testing shows that moving to Azure Database for PostgreSQL – Flexible Server is a simple process that can offer significantly better database performance and value. With as much as 4.71 times the NOPM on HammerDB and up to 3.88 times the performance per dollar compared to Single Server, moving to Azure Database for PostgreSQL – Flexible Sever with AMD EPYC processors can give you higher performing databases for lower relative cost.

Realize better value and performance migrating from Azure Database for Postgr...

Principled Technologies

We compared system performance on four ChromeOS devices powered by increasingly powerful Intel processors Conclusion AI technology, on ChromeOS devices equipped with powerful Intel processors, could be the steppingstone your district needs to make learning more accessible, increase student engagement, and remove barriers to student success. In our hands-on tests, each step up in the Intel processor upgrade story resulted in quicker open app and tab recoveries after shutdown in a traditional session restore scenario and a session restore scenario featuring AI. Don’t miss this opportunity to help teachers and students reach their potential.

Set up students and teachers to excel now and in the future with Intel proces...

Principled Technologies

Mehr von Principled Technologies (20)