Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant Presentation to the Assembly of Contributors
1. Transformation of INPP for decommissioning and Current Status of IIDSF Projects Osvaldas Čiukšys General Director Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant
2.
3. Successful operation of INPP: accumulated expertise and know-how of RBMK technology – key prequalification for successful RBMK type plant decommissioning - 1974 Preparations started for construction of INPP - 1983 Unit 1, 1987 Unit 2 commissioned - It took 11 years to build the worlds most powerful nuclear plant - Originally 4 RBMK-1500 reactors planned - ~ 6000 staff employed (1989) - In 2 7 years 308 bln k Wh of electricity - INPP specialists were the first to start using the enriched fuel with burnable absorber – erbium - Unique project of Unit 1 nuclear fuel reuse in Unit 2 reactor implemented 1st time in operation history of nuclear reactors - Other unique technology improvements & modifications
4.
5. Vision INPP - the company , safely and efficiently terminating its operation as a nuclear power facility, gaining and sharing its experience in decommissioning as well as turning its activities and ( infra ) structure to commercially effective and business oriented opportunities.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. ? Main periods for the whole decommissioning planning Revision of FDP / other key documents and amendments of legislation
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24. Thank you / A č i ū Ignalina International Decommissioning Support Fund Republic of Lithuania
Hinweis der Redaktion
The first part of the presentation is essentially that given at the NDAP in Luxembourg. If there has been progress on the topics mentioned in the first part, it would be good to include it. The second part of the presentation focuses specifically on the IIDSF projects. It is presented in the order proposed: B1 B2/3/4 B9 series B9-4 Tools (B14/15)
Unchanged
The data here refers only to the contract and does not mention that the contract was substantially over the original budget. Likewise it refers only to delays in the contract schedule rather than the originally planned project schedule. Does INPP have any idea what the scale of future claims under B1 may be?
The first part of the presentation is essentially that given at the NDAP in Luxembourg. If there has been progress on the topics mentioned in the first part, it would be good to include it. The second part of the presentation focuses specifically on the IIDSF projects. It is presented in the order proposed: B1 B2/3/4 B9 series B9-4 Tools (B14/15)
As with B1, would you wish to include the forecast budget for this facility? And the original planned implementation dates?