EVIDENCE OF PLANNED JUDICIAL MURDER DESIGNED BY SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

1. To,
The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India
New Delhi
EVIDENCE OF PLANNED JUDICIAL MURDER DESIGNED
BY SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1.That this complaint/grievance is in
continuation of my previous complaint/
grievance duly signed by me and filed by me
through R&I department of Supreme Court of
India by hand vide diary no.15411 dated
01.04.2017 and vide diary no. 16879 dated
10.04.2017
2.That the Complainant is the petitioner No.02
(aged about 71 years) in the Appeal by way of
motion under Order XV Rule 5 of Supreme Court
Rules 2013 against the Registrar’s Lodgment
Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)
D.NO.3913 of 2017 entitled “OM PRAKASH & ANR
VS. THE REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA &
ANR”.
3.That the complainant has withdrawn a
defective Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016
vide D.NO. 19917 dated 03.03.2017. Moreover,
the petitioner has NOT filed an application

2. for appearance in person or memo of
appearance in person against Curative
(Criminal) D 41026 of 2016.
4.That second forcible NOTICE of hearing for
01.05.2017 against Curative (Criminal) D
41026 of 2016 has been sent by the Registrar
dated 05.04.2017; the reply of forcible
NOTICE of hearing has been sent back on the
same date to set aside the forcible NOTICE of
hearing against Curative (Criminal) D 41026
of 2016 and issue a genuine NOTICE against
Appeal by way of motion under Order XV Rule 5
of Supreme Court Rules 2013 against the
Registrar’s Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017
in W.P.(Crl.) D.NO.3913 of 2017 entitled “OM
PRAKASH & ANR VS. THE REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT
OF INDIA & ANR”.
5.That Judicial order being reversed from
03.04.2017 to 22.03.2017 by SDJM Ms Meena
Kumari, CJM Division, Begusarai under the
Judicature of Patna High Court at the behest
of Supreme Court of India.
6.That three updates of order sheet by
Begusarai Court dated 09.01.2017, 15.02.2017
and 30.03.2017 are evident of this fact that
Judicial Murder is planned and designed from
the Supreme Court of India. Case Updates at
Begusarai Court dated 09.01.2017, 15.02.2017

3. and 30.03.2017 are annexed herein as Annexure
P-1 (Page from 11 to 16)
7.That first update on 09.01.2017. (Date of
Hearing 02.01.2017. Next Date of Hearing Not
updated). Second update on 15.02.2017.( Next
Date of Hearing 03.04.2017). Third update on
30.03.2017. (Date of Hearing 22.03.2017. Next
Date of Hearing 03.07.2017)
8. That these three updates by CJM division
Begusarai raises substantial question of Law.
How 22.03.2017 became the date of hearing all
of sudden while the date of hearing was
already fixed for 03.04.2017? Who tempered
the data at the e-court website? How Judicial
order being reversed from 03.04.2017 to
22.03.2017?
9.That the answers of these questions are
interlinked with the proceedings of the
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Because in
Supreme Court, Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of
2016 was forcibly listed by Registrar before
Hon'ble Justice Navin Sinha for direction on
27.03.2017. Because on 23.03.2017 the
Registry had Notified defects to remove
Prayer(b) from the Withdrawal Application of
Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016. The
Petitioner had refused to remove the same at
this Stage. The Petitioner had reverted back
the Registry on the same date that he would
not remove Prayer (b) from Withdrawal

4. Application of Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of
2016 AT THIS STAGE. Hence, it was planned
from Supreme Court and off the
record/confidential/indirect direction being
given from Supreme Court of India, therefore
scheduled date of hearing was changed all of
sudden from 03.04.2017 to 22.03.2017 by Ld.
SDJM Ms Meena Kumari, CJM Division, Begusarai
under the Judicature of Patna High Court. In
nutshell, whatever is happening at CJM
division Begusarai is Pre-Planned and being
designed at the behest of Rtd. Justice S.B.
Sinha and his associates from Supreme Court
of India.
10. That the Complainant has apprised the
alleged involvement of Rtd. Justice S.B.Sinha
into this matter to the Hon’ble Supreme Court
of India through nine cases for the
interlinked subject matters with different
cause of actions for the same relief till
03.02.2017. Fourteen year old matter, two
states jurisdiction and illegal confinement.
(SLP(C) no. 9854/2012, SLP(C) no. 9483/2013,
SLP(C) no. 19073/2013, Writ (C) 90 of 2016,
Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016, R.P. (Crl.) 825 of
2016, Curative (Crl.) D 41026 of 2016, Writ
(Crl.) D.NO.2188 of 2017 and Writ (Crl.)
D.NO. 3913 of 2017). Police Complaint u/s 200
Cr.Pc. and u/s 154(3)Cr.Pc. vide diary no.
37B dated 30.05.2016, computerized complaint
no. 00081710571601332 before P.S. Palam
Village, South West District at New Delhi has
also been filed by the petitioners for
registration of F.I.R against Rtd Justice
S.B. Sinha, Mr. Surender Narayan Poddar, Rtd.

5. Baruni Refinery employee and Mr. Praveen
Kumar (IDAS)& CMD of IDPL at New Delhi.
However, police has not registered F.I.R
against the accused so far.
11. That the complainant has placed the
names of thirty one bad elements of Center
and State Government’s apparatus alleged
associates of Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha of this
Hon’ble Court on the record of SCR with
material evidence in Writ (C) 90 OF 2016;
Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016; Writ (Crl.) D.NO.
2188 of 2017 and Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 3913 of
2017 filed so far before this Hon’ble Court.
List of Bad Elements are annexed herein as
Annexure P-2 (Page from 17 to 22)
12. That the actual respondent has NOT filed
a single piece of paper throughout the case
from Trial Court to High Court of Delhi.
13. That the Judges have played a role of
respondents throughout the case.
14. That the matter has been settled by the
High Court of Delhi in MATT.APPL. 7 of 2012
on 23.07.2013 with NO COST on the ground of
certified copy of Begusarai court in Bihar
and after SLP(C) no. 9854/2012, SLP(C) no.
9483/2013, SLP(C) no. 19073/2013 before this
Hon’ble Court. Application for early hearing

6. with receipt of delivery report of NOTICE of
motion vide ED881673094IN dated 29.04.2013 is
already on the record of SLP(C) No. 19073 of
2013 at page no. 165 to 169 annexed as
Annexure P-22 in the same petition. The
service affidavit with proof of delivery
receipt of ED986320975IN dated 08.12.2012 has
also been put on the record of High Court of
Delhi on 22.01.2013 vide diary no. 2376.
15. That the actual respondent has filed two
Criminal cases with two N.B.W before the CJM
division Begusarai Bihar and has supplied the
record of only one Criminal case with N.B.W
to the Trial Court at New Delhi on 09.02.2011
and has concealed another Criminal case with
criminal intention. First Criminal case u/s
D.V. Act dated 30.03.2010 with N.B.W. dated
25.08.2010 and another criminal case u/s 498A
dated 07.02.2011 with N.B.W. dated
08.09.2011. First one has been closed while
second one has been kept secret and has been
disclosed through RTI dated 27.08.2016.
Application for cancellation of N.B.W dated
25.08.2010 and replication to Criminal case
Complaint No. 9P of 2010 u/s D.V. Act has
been filed by the petitioners dated
03.03.2011 before CJM division Begusarai are
already on the record of SLP(C) No. 19073 of
2013 at page no. 29 to 46 annexed as Annexure
P-2(Colly)in the same petition.
16. That this Hon’ble Court has evaded the
Order XXXVIII of Supreme Court Rules 2013 in

7. Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016 and dismissed the
same with liberty to approach High Court.
17. That the petition raised substantial
question of Law as to the interpretation of
Constitution is required. Two states of
jurisdictions are involved for the same cause
of action and for the same relief. After
winning from High Court of Delhi petitioner
is being directed to approach Patna High
Court for the same cause of action and for
the same relief.
18. That aggrieved by this, the Complainant
has filed Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 2188 of 2017
entitled “OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA
& ORS” with Nine Prayers and nine reliefs
which has been Lodged by the Registrar dated
28.01.2017 by this Hon’ble Court.
19. That an Offence of PERJURY; abuse of
court process; 14 years long criminal
conspiracy; backstabbing; evasion of rule of
law by the Advocates and Judges from lower
court to High Court to Supreme Court of
India; NO ACTUAL PARTY ONLY PROXY WAR THROUGH
JUDGES IN TWO STATES from Lower Court to High
Court to Supreme Court and Nine Cases have
reached up to Supreme Court of India till
03.02.2017 are the main features of the whole
petition.

8. 20. That the complainant in Writ (Crl.)
D.NO. 2188 of 2017 entitled “OM PRAKASH & ANR
VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS” claiming relief of
Mandamus or prohibition or certiorari in
respect of cancellation of N.B.W dated
08.09.2011 issued under 83 Cr.Pc. against the
petitioners and quashing the Criminal Case
Complaint (P) No. 5591 of 2013 u/s 498A of
IPC. The petitioners also seek the dismissal
and imprisonment against the concerned
Magistrate and Women Protection Officer for
an offence of perjury and illegal confinement
of the petitioners. The petitioners also seek
the removal of the legal aid Advocates from
the empanelment of the legal Aid Institutions
who were associated with the case of the
petitioners from the Trial Court to this
Hon’ble Court. The petitioners also seek
cancellation of registration no. 836/1991 of
Advocate Gopal Kumar and husband of Women
protection officer registered under Bihar
State Bar Council for an offence of perjury
and seek Rs. 50 Lakh as compensation for
causing them irreparable damage, loss and
illegal confinement. The petitioners also
seek dismissal against Mr. Praveen Kumar
(IDAS) and seek Rs. 50 Lakh as compensation
for an offence of perjury and keeping them
captive and house arrest illegally and
causing them irreparable damage and loss.
21. That under the above noted circumstances
Registrar of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India
is stopping the petitioners to agitate the
matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of
India and spoiling the genuine nine reliefs
of petitioners prayed in Writ (Crl.) D.NO.
2188 of 2017.

9. 22. That the death certificate of the
husband of petitioner no.02 is already on the
record of SLP(C) NO. 9854 of 2012 at page no.
18 to 22 annexed as Annexure P-1; SLP(C) NO.
9483 of 2013 at page no. 18 to 22 annexed as
Annexure P-1(Colly) and SLP(C) NO. 19073 of
2013 at page no. 24 to 28 annexed as Annexure
P-1(Colly) in the same petition. The death
certificate of petitioner no.02 is likely to
be on the SCR. Thereafter no one will be left
in her family and her life time acquired
property will be usurped by the Rtd. Justice
S.B. Sinha and his associates.
23. That the illiterate, before independence
born petitioner no.02 has earned her property
through ploughing her own agricultural land,
doing domestic household works at her
neighborhood and selling cow dung. She is
emotionally attached to her property and
wants to die at her own house not in Delhi.
However, she is being stopped to visit her
own house since two years due to disclosure
of N.B.W. u/s 83 Cr.Pc through RTI dated
27.08.2016. Hence, freedom of movement across
Indian Territory has been infringed by the
Lower Court under the Judicature of Patna
High Court.
PRAYER
It is most respectfully prayed from Hon’ble the
Chief Justice of India:

10. (i) To intervene into the planned judicial
murder designed by the Supreme Court
of India.
(ii) To direct the Registrar to register
the Writ (Crl.) D.NO.2188 of 2017
entitled “OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION
OF INDIA & ORS” and allow the
petitioners to agitate the matter
before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of
India for urgent relief.
Complainant
Filed on: . .
Diary No.
Widow Asha Rani Devi
W/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
Petitioner No.02
In Writ (Crl.) D.NO.3913 of 2017
ASHA DEEP NIWAS
Shukkar Hatt, Near Durga Mandir
Sonaili, Katihar, Bihar-855114
Mob: 9968337815