SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 39
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Change Detection 
Prepared by:Prepared by:
Oluwafemi Opaleye
ObjectivesObjectives
• Introduction
• What is Change Detection?What is Change Detection?
• Pre‐processing / Requirement 
• Change Detection Techniques
• Application AreasApplication Areas
• Practical Example
• Further Readings
04/07/2013 2
Introduction
Remote Sensing (RS) methods try to answer
four basic questions:f q
How much of What is Where? 
• What:  Type, Characteristic and Properties of Object.    
e.g. Water, Vegetation, Land etc.g g
• How Much: determine by simple Counting, 
measuring Area covered or percentage of total areameasuring Area  covered or percentage of  total area 
coverage.
• Where: Relate locations and area covered to either a• Where: Relate locations and area covered to either a 
standard map or to the actual location on the 
‘ground’ where the object occursground  where the object occurs.
Note: Where also refers to a moment in time04/07/2013 3
• What is the SHAPE and EXTENT of ... ?
(Area Boundaries Lineaments )(Area, Boundaries, Lineaments, ...)
• This extends the ‘WHERE’ to be a completely 
GEOMETRIC blGEOMETRIC problem.
– Identification and Delineation of Boundaries
04/07/2013 4
• What is the MIX of Objects?at s t e o Objects?
Th f f th E th i d b bj t likThe surface of the Earth is covered by objects like 
Soil, Water, Grass, Trees, Houses, Roads and so on. 
‐ Landuse/Landcover ‐ Classification
04/07/2013 5
• Has it CHANGED?
CHANGE   may occur with progress of TIME.
Change may be detected through comparison of 
observed states at different moments in time.
‐ CHANGE DETECTION
04/07/2013 6
What is Change Detection?What is Change Detection?
• Change detection is the process of identifying 
differences in the state of an object or phenomenon 
by observing it at different times. 
• It is the detection of class transition between a pair 
of co‐registered imagesof co‐registered images.
• The main goal is to use remote sensing to detect 
CHANGE on a landscape (landuse and landcover) 
over time.
04/07/2013 7
• Change detection algorithms analyze multiple images of
the same scene – taken at different times – to identifyy
regions of change.
• Changes on the earth surface could be directly caused by
natural forces, by the activities of animals and human
i d dinduced.
Ti l d h d i f E h’ f• Timely and accurate change detection of Earth’s surface
features provides the foundation for a better
understanding of the relationships and interactionsunderstanding of the relationships and interactions
between human and natural phenomena in order to
better manage and use resources.
04/07/2013 8
• It can be performed with raw remote sensing bands
or thematic land cover maps classified from them.or thematic land cover maps classified from them.
G d Ch D t ti h h ld id th• Good Change Detection research should provide the
following:
• area changeg
• rate of change
• spatial distribution of changed types• spatial distribution of changed types
• accuracy assessment of change detection results
04/07/2013 9
Pre‐processing / Requirement
• Geometric Correction – Georeferencing ‐ precise 
coregistration between multitemporal imagescoregistration between multitemporal images
• Radiometric Correction ‐ precise radiometric and 
atmospheric calibration or normalization betweenatmospheric calibration or normalization between 
multitemporal images
/ f h l• Region/Area of Interest – same geographic location
• Remote sensing system consideration – spatial, 
spectral, radiometric and temporal
– whenever possible, select images acquired from the same 
type of sensors, with the same spectral and spatial 
resolutions, and at the same seasonal timeframe in order to 
i i i t d iminimize unwanted variances.
04/07/2013 10
• Free of clouds in the area of analysis
• Select time periods – what is change detection 
period?period?
• Select Landcover scheme – they must be classified in 
accordance with the same classification schemeaccordance with the same classification scheme.
– classes must also be defined identically
Cl ifi ti h l ifi ti l ith• Classification – choose classification algorithm
• Choose change detection method
• Change detection accuracy assessment 
04/07/2013 11
Major steps involved in a typical change analysis 
process change detection procedurep g p
04/07/2013 12
Change Detection TechniquesChange Detection Techniques
• Visual Analysis
• Image Differencing
• Image ratioing• Image ratioing
• Post Classification Comparison
• Statistical analysis
04/07/2013 13
Visual AnalysisVisual Analysis
• It is the first place to start
• Visually comparing multi‐images
• Manual digitizing changes in multi‐images is often g g g g
used to both identify and classify change between 
imagesg
• Elements of image interpretation combined with the 
knowledge of the area of study are often usedknowledge of the area of study are often used.
04/07/2013 14
Drying up of Lake Faguibine ‐ Mali
1974 2006
▪ It covered area of about 590km2
▪ Water level have fluctuated widely since the beginning of 1980
▪ An extended period of reduced precipitation led to a complete drying of the
lakelake
Source: Africa: Atlas of Our Changing Environment , UNEP
04/07/2013 15
Declining Water Levels in Lake Chad (1972‐2007)
1972 A (12 797 k )1972 1987Area (12,797sqkm)
Area (1,563sqkm)
2007
1987 Image show that lake Chad
Lake Chad, located at the junction
of Niger, Nigeria, Chad and
Cameroon, was once the sixth
g
reduced to about one-tenth of what it
was in 1972 image.
2007 image show some improvement
but the extent of the lake is stilllargest lake in the world.
Persistent drought and increased
agriculture irrigation have reduced
the lake’s extent
but the extent of the lake is still
smaller to what it was 2-3 decades
ago.
Area (1 753sqkm)Area (1,753sqkm)
04/07/2013 16
Image Differencingg g
• It requires selection of corresponding bands from two
dates imageries of the same study area
• Uses software algorithm to identify and quantify the
changes between two temporal images
• The difference image is created by subtracting the
brightness values of one image from the other on a per‐g g p
pixel basis.
• Unchanged areas will have values at or nearer zero; whileg ;
areas with significant change will be progressively
positive or negative.
04/07/2013 17
Example of image differencing  procedure
04/07/2013 18
Advantages
• It is relatively easy to understand and to implement.y y p
• This method of analysis involves only subtraction
with minimal human intervention.with minimal human intervention.
• So long as the two images have been sampled to the
same ground resolution and projected to the samesame ground resolution and projected to the same
coordinate system, the subtraction can be carried
out very quicklyout very quickly.
• The results of change detection are not subject
• to the inaccuracy inherent in classified land cover
maps.
04/07/2013 19
LimitationsLimitations
• this method is limited in that it fails to reveal the• this method is limited in that it fails to reveal the
nature of a detected change (e.g., the class from
which a land cover has changed).which a land cover has changed).
• identify threshold values of change and no change in• identify threshold values of change and no‐change in 
the resulting images.
• direct use of raw spectral data in change analysis
makes the detected change highly susceptible tomakes the detected change highly susceptible to
radiometric variations caused by illumination
conditions and seasonality.conditions and seasonality.
04/07/2013 20
Image Ratioing
• Similar to Image differencing conceptually and in its• Similar to Image differencing conceptually and in its
simplicity.
• This method uses one temporal image to divide
image of another date.
• Values near to 1.0 indicate – no change
• Values greater or less than 1.0 indicate changesg g
• Usually used for vegetation studies
• All other advantages and disadvantages of image• All other advantages and disadvantages of image
differencing apply to image ratioing.
04/07/2013 21
Example of image ratioing procedure
04/07/2013 22
Post Classification ComparisonPost Classification Comparison
• Most popular method of change detection
• In post classification comparison, each date of 
rectified imagery is independently classified to fit 
common landtype.
• Landcover maps are overlaid and compared  pixel by 
pixel basis.p e bas s
• The result is a map of landtype change
• The change map display acreage of each change• The change map display acreage of each change 
class
04/07/2013 23
AdvantagesAdvantages
• Many classification algorithms can be directly used. 
It can provide detailed matrix of change information 
and accuracy assessment is easy.
• Easy to quantify the area of change and rate of 
changec a ge
• It also attribute changes e.g.
04/07/2013 24
LimitationsLimitations
• Classification accuracy directly influences the 
accuracy of change detection.
• It is time‐consuming to create classification results 
and a professional operator is necessary.
• It is difficult and expensive to obtain appropriate 
multi‐temporal ground reference.u e po a g ou d e e e ce
04/07/2013 25
Sources of Error in Change DetectionSources of Error in Change Detection
• Errors in data – image quality
• Atmospheric errorAtmospheric error
• Mis‐registration between multiple image dates
• Seasonal variability
• Processing error 
• Radiometric error – due to sensor drift or age
• Error in ClassificationError in Classification
04/07/2013 26
Application AreasApplication Areas
l d /l d h• landcover/landuse changes
• mapping urban growth
• rate of deforestation
• urban sprawlurban sprawl
• desertification
di t it i• disaster monitoring
• agriculture
• coastal change
• environmental impact assessmentp
04/07/2013 27
Practical Example:Practical xample:
Geospatial Assessment of Amanawa ForestGeospatial Assessment of Amanawa Forest 
Reserve, Sokoto State, Nigeria
04/07/2013 28
1996 Landcover Map of Amanawa Forest Reserve 
AreaArea
04/07/2013 29
2008 Landcover Map of Amanawa Forest 
Reserve Area
04/07/2013 30
Landcover Type 1996
A ( k )
1996
P t (%)
2008
A ( k )
2008
P t (%)Area (sqkm) Percentage (%) Area (sqkm) Percentage (%)
Farmland 30.627 74.71 30.772 75.07
Rock Outcrop 4.6449 11.33 4.0734 9.94
Bare Soil 3.537 8.63 4.1517 10.12
Forest Reserve 2.0133 4.91 1.89 4.61
Dam 0.171 0.42 0.1053 0.26
Total 40.9932 100 40.9932 100
04/07/2013 31
Change Detection Map showing transition of 
L d (1996 2008)Landcovers (1996‐2008)
04/07/2013 32
Landcover Area (sqkm) Difference  Increase/Decline
Type
( q )
(sqkm) (%)
1996 2008 1996 ‐ 2008 1996 ‐ 2008
Farmland
30 627 30 772 0 145 0 47330.627 30.772 0.145 0.473
Rock 
Outcrop
4 645 4 073 0 572 12 304
Outc op
4.645 4.073 ‐0.572 ‐12.304
Bare Soil 3.537 4.152 0.615 17.379
ForestForest 
Reserve
2.013 1.890 ‐0.123 ‐6.124
Dam 0 171 0 105 0 066 38 421Dam 0.171 0.105 ‐0.066 ‐38.421
04/07/2013 33
• Prediction Analysisy
04/07/2013 34
Markov Probability of Change in Landcover (1996 –
2008)
Bare Soil Dam Farmland Forest RockBare Soil   Dam  Farmland Forest Rock 
Outcrop
Bare Soil  0.7646  0.0382  0.1726  0.0233  0.0012 
Dam 0.2765  0.6137  0.1098  0.0000  0.0000 
Farmland 0.3212 0.0680  0.6097  0.0011  0.0000 
Forest 0.1849  0.0000  0.1475  0.6676  0.0000 
Rock Outcrop 0.3376  0.0000  0.0231  0.0000  0.6393
2018 Projected Landcover Map of Amanawa Forest 
AArea
Area and Percentage of 2018 Projected Landcover of 
Amanawa Forest Area
Landcover Type Area (sqkm) Percentage (%)
Farmland 27 5877 67 3Farmland 27.5877 67.3
Rock Outcrop 3.9555 9.65
Bare Soil 7.6527 18.67
Forest Reserve 1.71 4.17
Dam 0.0873 0.21Dam 0.0873 0.21
Total 40.9932 100
Reading for further informationg
• J.R. Jensen (2005)Introductory Digital Image J Je se ( 005) t oducto y g ta age
Processing, A Remote sensing perspective. 
467 492467‐492
• R. R. Jensen, J. D. Gatrell and D. McLean 
(2007) Geo‐Spatial Technologies in Urban 
Environments Policy, Practice, and Pixels. 145‐y, ,
167
04/07/2013 38
Thank You for Listening
04/07/2013 39

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Introduction to GIS
Introduction to GISIntroduction to GIS
Introduction to GIS
Uday kumar Devalla
 
Lec_6_Intro to geo-referencing
Lec_6_Intro to geo-referencingLec_6_Intro to geo-referencing
Lec_6_Intro to geo-referencing
Atiqa khan
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Geodatabases
GeodatabasesGeodatabases
Geodatabases
 
Components of Spatial Data Quality in GIS
Components of Spatial Data Quality in GISComponents of Spatial Data Quality in GIS
Components of Spatial Data Quality in GIS
 
GIS
GISGIS
GIS
 
Introduction to gis
Introduction to gisIntroduction to gis
Introduction to gis
 
Photogrammetry - areaotriangulation
Photogrammetry - areaotriangulationPhotogrammetry - areaotriangulation
Photogrammetry - areaotriangulation
 
DEM,DTM,DSM
DEM,DTM,DSMDEM,DTM,DSM
DEM,DTM,DSM
 
Chap1 introduction to geographic information system (gis)
Chap1 introduction to geographic information system (gis)Chap1 introduction to geographic information system (gis)
Chap1 introduction to geographic information system (gis)
 
GIS Data Types
GIS Data TypesGIS Data Types
GIS Data Types
 
Introduction to GIS
Introduction to GISIntroduction to GIS
Introduction to GIS
 
A review of change detection techniques
A review of change detection techniques A review of change detection techniques
A review of change detection techniques
 
Components of GIS
Components of GISComponents of GIS
Components of GIS
 
Lec_6_Intro to geo-referencing
Lec_6_Intro to geo-referencingLec_6_Intro to geo-referencing
Lec_6_Intro to geo-referencing
 
Thermal remote sensing
Thermal remote sensingThermal remote sensing
Thermal remote sensing
 
photogrammetry
photogrammetryphotogrammetry
photogrammetry
 
Historical Development of Photogrammetry
Historical Development of PhotogrammetryHistorical Development of Photogrammetry
Historical Development of Photogrammetry
 
Introduction to GIS
Introduction to GISIntroduction to GIS
Introduction to GIS
 
Georeferencing
GeoreferencingGeoreferencing
Georeferencing
 
DTM
DTMDTM
DTM
 
Spatial analysis & interpolation in ARC GIS
Spatial analysis & interpolation in ARC GISSpatial analysis & interpolation in ARC GIS
Spatial analysis & interpolation in ARC GIS
 
GEOSTATISTICAL_ANALYST
GEOSTATISTICAL_ANALYSTGEOSTATISTICAL_ANALYST
GEOSTATISTICAL_ANALYST
 

Andere mochten auch

Change Detection Dubai
Change Detection DubaiChange Detection Dubai
Change Detection Dubai
Ipsit Dash
 
Land Use/Land Cover Detection
Land Use/Land Cover DetectionLand Use/Land Cover Detection
Land Use/Land Cover Detection
Wansoo Im
 
Wavelet based image fusion
Wavelet based image fusionWavelet based image fusion
Wavelet based image fusion
Umed Paliwal
 
IMAGE FUSION IN IMAGE PROCESSING
IMAGE FUSION IN IMAGE PROCESSINGIMAGE FUSION IN IMAGE PROCESSING
IMAGE FUSION IN IMAGE PROCESSING
garima0690
 

Andere mochten auch (12)

Change detection process and techniques
Change detection process and techniquesChange detection process and techniques
Change detection process and techniques
 
Change Detection Dubai
Change Detection DubaiChange Detection Dubai
Change Detection Dubai
 
Change detection
Change detection Change detection
Change detection
 
Land Use/Land Cover Detection
Land Use/Land Cover DetectionLand Use/Land Cover Detection
Land Use/Land Cover Detection
 
Application of GIS and Remote Sensing in the analysis of Landuse/Landcover ch...
Application of GIS and Remote Sensing in the analysis of Landuse/Landcover ch...Application of GIS and Remote Sensing in the analysis of Landuse/Landcover ch...
Application of GIS and Remote Sensing in the analysis of Landuse/Landcover ch...
 
Change detection analysis in land use / land cover of Pune city using remotel...
Change detection analysis in land use / land cover of Pune city using remotel...Change detection analysis in land use / land cover of Pune city using remotel...
Change detection analysis in land use / land cover of Pune city using remotel...
 
Shoreline Change Maps and Projected Shoreline Change for the RI Shoreline_RIF...
Shoreline Change Maps and Projected Shoreline Change for the RI Shoreline_RIF...Shoreline Change Maps and Projected Shoreline Change for the RI Shoreline_RIF...
Shoreline Change Maps and Projected Shoreline Change for the RI Shoreline_RIF...
 
Angular 2.0 change detection
Angular 2.0 change detectionAngular 2.0 change detection
Angular 2.0 change detection
 
Urban Land Cover Change Detection Analysis and Modelling Spatio-Temporal Grow...
Urban Land Cover Change Detection Analysis and Modelling Spatio-Temporal Grow...Urban Land Cover Change Detection Analysis and Modelling Spatio-Temporal Grow...
Urban Land Cover Change Detection Analysis and Modelling Spatio-Temporal Grow...
 
Wavelet based image fusion
Wavelet based image fusionWavelet based image fusion
Wavelet based image fusion
 
IMAGE FUSION IN IMAGE PROCESSING
IMAGE FUSION IN IMAGE PROCESSINGIMAGE FUSION IN IMAGE PROCESSING
IMAGE FUSION IN IMAGE PROCESSING
 
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of WorkTEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
 

Ähnlich wie Change detection techniques

Portal Imaging used to clear setup uncertainty
Portal Imaging used to clear setup uncertaintyPortal Imaging used to clear setup uncertainty
Portal Imaging used to clear setup uncertainty
MajoVJJose
 
Seismic Refraction Surveying
Seismic Refraction SurveyingSeismic Refraction Surveying
Seismic Refraction Surveying
Ali Osman Öncel
 

Ähnlich wie Change detection techniques (20)

Buni zum Glacier
Buni zum GlacierBuni zum Glacier
Buni zum Glacier
 
Remote sensing for change detection (presentation) - Prepared by A F M Fakhru...
Remote sensing for change detection (presentation) - Prepared by A F M Fakhru...Remote sensing for change detection (presentation) - Prepared by A F M Fakhru...
Remote sensing for change detection (presentation) - Prepared by A F M Fakhru...
 
Supervised remote sensing Image Classification.pptx
Supervised remote sensing Image Classification.pptxSupervised remote sensing Image Classification.pptx
Supervised remote sensing Image Classification.pptx
 
Land Suitability Analysis.pdf
Land Suitability Analysis.pdfLand Suitability Analysis.pdf
Land Suitability Analysis.pdf
 
D017341721
D017341721D017341721
D017341721
 
A Review of Change Detection Techniques of LandCover Using Remote Sensing Data
A Review of Change Detection Techniques of LandCover Using Remote Sensing DataA Review of Change Detection Techniques of LandCover Using Remote Sensing Data
A Review of Change Detection Techniques of LandCover Using Remote Sensing Data
 
Image guided adaptive radiotherapy
Image guided adaptive radiotherapyImage guided adaptive radiotherapy
Image guided adaptive radiotherapy
 
Automatic Delineation of Grid based and Geo-Morphological Slope Units for Sus...
Automatic Delineation of Grid based and Geo-Morphological Slope Units for Sus...Automatic Delineation of Grid based and Geo-Morphological Slope Units for Sus...
Automatic Delineation of Grid based and Geo-Morphological Slope Units for Sus...
 
Land use cover pptx.
Land use cover pptx.Land use cover pptx.
Land use cover pptx.
 
Portal Imaging used to clear setup uncertainty
Portal Imaging used to clear setup uncertaintyPortal Imaging used to clear setup uncertainty
Portal Imaging used to clear setup uncertainty
 
GNSS Observation (4)
GNSS Observation (4)GNSS Observation (4)
GNSS Observation (4)
 
Multi-Spectral Analysis of Satellite Imagery for Inventory of Sensitive Marin...
Multi-Spectral Analysis of Satellite Imagery for Inventory of Sensitive Marin...Multi-Spectral Analysis of Satellite Imagery for Inventory of Sensitive Marin...
Multi-Spectral Analysis of Satellite Imagery for Inventory of Sensitive Marin...
 
Scale and resolution
Scale and resolutionScale and resolution
Scale and resolution
 
Lec (remote sensing).pptx
Lec (remote sensing).pptxLec (remote sensing).pptx
Lec (remote sensing).pptx
 
Seismic refractionsurveying r4a
Seismic refractionsurveying r4aSeismic refractionsurveying r4a
Seismic refractionsurveying r4a
 
Seismic Refraction Surveying
Seismic Refraction SurveyingSeismic Refraction Surveying
Seismic Refraction Surveying
 
2nd CSP Training series : solar resource assessment (1/2)
2nd CSP Training series : solar resource assessment (1/2)2nd CSP Training series : solar resource assessment (1/2)
2nd CSP Training series : solar resource assessment (1/2)
 
Aitf 2014 pem_introduction_presentation_feb28_ram_version2
Aitf 2014 pem_introduction_presentation_feb28_ram_version2Aitf 2014 pem_introduction_presentation_feb28_ram_version2
Aitf 2014 pem_introduction_presentation_feb28_ram_version2
 
Lec16: Medical Image Registration (Advanced): Deformable Registration
Lec16: Medical Image Registration (Advanced): Deformable RegistrationLec16: Medical Image Registration (Advanced): Deformable Registration
Lec16: Medical Image Registration (Advanced): Deformable Registration
 
thesis_slides
thesis_slidesthesis_slides
thesis_slides
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Victor Rentea
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...
Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...
Navigating the Deluge_ Dubai Floods and the Resilience of Dubai International...
 
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherStrategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
 
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
 
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemkeProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
 
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with MilvusExploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
 
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
 
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
 
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin WoodPolkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
 
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
 
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital AdaptabilityPlatformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
 

Change detection techniques

  • 2. ObjectivesObjectives • Introduction • What is Change Detection?What is Change Detection? • Pre‐processing / Requirement  • Change Detection Techniques • Application AreasApplication Areas • Practical Example • Further Readings 04/07/2013 2
  • 3. Introduction Remote Sensing (RS) methods try to answer four basic questions:f q How much of What is Where?  • What:  Type, Characteristic and Properties of Object.     e.g. Water, Vegetation, Land etc.g g • How Much: determine by simple Counting,  measuring Area covered or percentage of total areameasuring Area  covered or percentage of  total area  coverage. • Where: Relate locations and area covered to either a• Where: Relate locations and area covered to either a  standard map or to the actual location on the  ‘ground’ where the object occursground  where the object occurs. Note: Where also refers to a moment in time04/07/2013 3
  • 4. • What is the SHAPE and EXTENT of ... ? (Area Boundaries Lineaments )(Area, Boundaries, Lineaments, ...) • This extends the ‘WHERE’ to be a completely  GEOMETRIC blGEOMETRIC problem. – Identification and Delineation of Boundaries 04/07/2013 4
  • 5. • What is the MIX of Objects?at s t e o Objects? Th f f th E th i d b bj t likThe surface of the Earth is covered by objects like  Soil, Water, Grass, Trees, Houses, Roads and so on.  ‐ Landuse/Landcover ‐ Classification 04/07/2013 5
  • 7. What is Change Detection?What is Change Detection? • Change detection is the process of identifying  differences in the state of an object or phenomenon  by observing it at different times.  • It is the detection of class transition between a pair  of co‐registered imagesof co‐registered images. • The main goal is to use remote sensing to detect  CHANGE on a landscape (landuse and landcover)  over time. 04/07/2013 7
  • 8. • Change detection algorithms analyze multiple images of the same scene – taken at different times – to identifyy regions of change. • Changes on the earth surface could be directly caused by natural forces, by the activities of animals and human i d dinduced. Ti l d h d i f E h’ f• Timely and accurate change detection of Earth’s surface features provides the foundation for a better understanding of the relationships and interactionsunderstanding of the relationships and interactions between human and natural phenomena in order to better manage and use resources. 04/07/2013 8
  • 9. • It can be performed with raw remote sensing bands or thematic land cover maps classified from them.or thematic land cover maps classified from them. G d Ch D t ti h h ld id th• Good Change Detection research should provide the following: • area changeg • rate of change • spatial distribution of changed types• spatial distribution of changed types • accuracy assessment of change detection results 04/07/2013 9
  • 10. Pre‐processing / Requirement • Geometric Correction – Georeferencing ‐ precise  coregistration between multitemporal imagescoregistration between multitemporal images • Radiometric Correction ‐ precise radiometric and  atmospheric calibration or normalization betweenatmospheric calibration or normalization between  multitemporal images / f h l• Region/Area of Interest – same geographic location • Remote sensing system consideration – spatial,  spectral, radiometric and temporal – whenever possible, select images acquired from the same  type of sensors, with the same spectral and spatial  resolutions, and at the same seasonal timeframe in order to  i i i t d iminimize unwanted variances. 04/07/2013 10
  • 11. • Free of clouds in the area of analysis • Select time periods – what is change detection  period?period? • Select Landcover scheme – they must be classified in  accordance with the same classification schemeaccordance with the same classification scheme. – classes must also be defined identically Cl ifi ti h l ifi ti l ith• Classification – choose classification algorithm • Choose change detection method • Change detection accuracy assessment  04/07/2013 11
  • 13. Change Detection TechniquesChange Detection Techniques • Visual Analysis • Image Differencing • Image ratioing• Image ratioing • Post Classification Comparison • Statistical analysis 04/07/2013 13
  • 14. Visual AnalysisVisual Analysis • It is the first place to start • Visually comparing multi‐images • Manual digitizing changes in multi‐images is often g g g g used to both identify and classify change between  imagesg • Elements of image interpretation combined with the  knowledge of the area of study are often usedknowledge of the area of study are often used. 04/07/2013 14
  • 15. Drying up of Lake Faguibine ‐ Mali 1974 2006 ▪ It covered area of about 590km2 ▪ Water level have fluctuated widely since the beginning of 1980 ▪ An extended period of reduced precipitation led to a complete drying of the lakelake Source: Africa: Atlas of Our Changing Environment , UNEP 04/07/2013 15
  • 16. Declining Water Levels in Lake Chad (1972‐2007) 1972 A (12 797 k )1972 1987Area (12,797sqkm) Area (1,563sqkm) 2007 1987 Image show that lake Chad Lake Chad, located at the junction of Niger, Nigeria, Chad and Cameroon, was once the sixth g reduced to about one-tenth of what it was in 1972 image. 2007 image show some improvement but the extent of the lake is stilllargest lake in the world. Persistent drought and increased agriculture irrigation have reduced the lake’s extent but the extent of the lake is still smaller to what it was 2-3 decades ago. Area (1 753sqkm)Area (1,753sqkm) 04/07/2013 16
  • 17. Image Differencingg g • It requires selection of corresponding bands from two dates imageries of the same study area • Uses software algorithm to identify and quantify the changes between two temporal images • The difference image is created by subtracting the brightness values of one image from the other on a per‐g g p pixel basis. • Unchanged areas will have values at or nearer zero; whileg ; areas with significant change will be progressively positive or negative. 04/07/2013 17
  • 19. Advantages • It is relatively easy to understand and to implement.y y p • This method of analysis involves only subtraction with minimal human intervention.with minimal human intervention. • So long as the two images have been sampled to the same ground resolution and projected to the samesame ground resolution and projected to the same coordinate system, the subtraction can be carried out very quicklyout very quickly. • The results of change detection are not subject • to the inaccuracy inherent in classified land cover maps. 04/07/2013 19
  • 20. LimitationsLimitations • this method is limited in that it fails to reveal the• this method is limited in that it fails to reveal the nature of a detected change (e.g., the class from which a land cover has changed).which a land cover has changed). • identify threshold values of change and no change in• identify threshold values of change and no‐change in  the resulting images. • direct use of raw spectral data in change analysis makes the detected change highly susceptible tomakes the detected change highly susceptible to radiometric variations caused by illumination conditions and seasonality.conditions and seasonality. 04/07/2013 20
  • 21. Image Ratioing • Similar to Image differencing conceptually and in its• Similar to Image differencing conceptually and in its simplicity. • This method uses one temporal image to divide image of another date. • Values near to 1.0 indicate – no change • Values greater or less than 1.0 indicate changesg g • Usually used for vegetation studies • All other advantages and disadvantages of image• All other advantages and disadvantages of image differencing apply to image ratioing. 04/07/2013 21
  • 23. Post Classification ComparisonPost Classification Comparison • Most popular method of change detection • In post classification comparison, each date of  rectified imagery is independently classified to fit  common landtype. • Landcover maps are overlaid and compared  pixel by  pixel basis.p e bas s • The result is a map of landtype change • The change map display acreage of each change• The change map display acreage of each change  class 04/07/2013 23
  • 26. Sources of Error in Change DetectionSources of Error in Change Detection • Errors in data – image quality • Atmospheric errorAtmospheric error • Mis‐registration between multiple image dates • Seasonal variability • Processing error  • Radiometric error – due to sensor drift or age • Error in ClassificationError in Classification 04/07/2013 26
  • 27. Application AreasApplication Areas l d /l d h• landcover/landuse changes • mapping urban growth • rate of deforestation • urban sprawlurban sprawl • desertification di t it i• disaster monitoring • agriculture • coastal change • environmental impact assessmentp 04/07/2013 27
  • 28. Practical Example:Practical xample: Geospatial Assessment of Amanawa ForestGeospatial Assessment of Amanawa Forest  Reserve, Sokoto State, Nigeria 04/07/2013 28
  • 31. Landcover Type 1996 A ( k ) 1996 P t (%) 2008 A ( k ) 2008 P t (%)Area (sqkm) Percentage (%) Area (sqkm) Percentage (%) Farmland 30.627 74.71 30.772 75.07 Rock Outcrop 4.6449 11.33 4.0734 9.94 Bare Soil 3.537 8.63 4.1517 10.12 Forest Reserve 2.0133 4.91 1.89 4.61 Dam 0.171 0.42 0.1053 0.26 Total 40.9932 100 40.9932 100 04/07/2013 31
  • 32. Change Detection Map showing transition of  L d (1996 2008)Landcovers (1996‐2008) 04/07/2013 32
  • 33. Landcover Area (sqkm) Difference  Increase/Decline Type ( q ) (sqkm) (%) 1996 2008 1996 ‐ 2008 1996 ‐ 2008 Farmland 30 627 30 772 0 145 0 47330.627 30.772 0.145 0.473 Rock  Outcrop 4 645 4 073 0 572 12 304 Outc op 4.645 4.073 ‐0.572 ‐12.304 Bare Soil 3.537 4.152 0.615 17.379 ForestForest  Reserve 2.013 1.890 ‐0.123 ‐6.124 Dam 0 171 0 105 0 066 38 421Dam 0.171 0.105 ‐0.066 ‐38.421 04/07/2013 33
  • 35. Markov Probability of Change in Landcover (1996 – 2008) Bare Soil Dam Farmland Forest RockBare Soil   Dam  Farmland Forest Rock  Outcrop Bare Soil  0.7646  0.0382  0.1726  0.0233  0.0012  Dam 0.2765  0.6137  0.1098  0.0000  0.0000  Farmland 0.3212 0.0680  0.6097  0.0011  0.0000  Forest 0.1849  0.0000  0.1475  0.6676  0.0000  Rock Outcrop 0.3376  0.0000  0.0231  0.0000  0.6393
  • 37. Area and Percentage of 2018 Projected Landcover of  Amanawa Forest Area Landcover Type Area (sqkm) Percentage (%) Farmland 27 5877 67 3Farmland 27.5877 67.3 Rock Outcrop 3.9555 9.65 Bare Soil 7.6527 18.67 Forest Reserve 1.71 4.17 Dam 0.0873 0.21Dam 0.0873 0.21 Total 40.9932 100
  • 38. Reading for further informationg • J.R. Jensen (2005)Introductory Digital Image J Je se ( 005) t oducto y g ta age Processing, A Remote sensing perspective.  467 492467‐492 • R. R. Jensen, J. D. Gatrell and D. McLean  (2007) Geo‐Spatial Technologies in Urban  Environments Policy, Practice, and Pixels. 145‐y, , 167 04/07/2013 38