1. "ORCID
on
a
Na,onal
Scale:
Opportuni,es
and
Challenges“:
a
few
ideas
Pablo
de
Castro
GrandIR,
C.B.
pcastro@grandir.com

2. (at
the
table)
David
Arellano
–
fecyt
Magchiel
Bijsterbosch
–
surf/dai
Josh
Brown
–
jisc
Pablo
de
Castro
–
grandir/uk
repnet
plus
(at
the
floor)
Amanda
Hill
–
NAMES
UK
Mogens
Sandfaer
–
DTU/DEFF
…

3. Some
issues
on
ORCID
on
a
Na,onal
Scale…

4. Na,onal
Author
IDs:
are
they
an
advantage
for
ORCID
implementa,on?
A
disadvantage?
They
have
no
impact
whatsoever?
What
if
they’re
only
halfway
through
its
implementa,on/comple,on?

5. Some
ORCID/Na.onal
Author
IDs
issues:
-­‐
overlapping
-­‐
funding/business
models
-­‐
implementa,on
strategy/de-­‐duplica,on
-­‐
authors
covered
on
na,onality
or
affilia,on
criteria?

6. Some
issues
on
ORCID
on
a
Na.onal
Scale:
ORCID
implementa,on
on
a
na,onal
scale:
small
vs
big
countries
(pop/researcher
count,
not
size)
–
business
model
&
,meschedules

7. Some
issues
on
ORCID
on
a
Na.onal
Scale:
-­‐
Na,onal
research
informa,on
mgt
offices
(such
as
DFG
in
Germany,
FECYT
in
Spain,
SURF
in
The
Netherlands,
DEFF
in
Denmark
or
JISC
in
the
UK)
obvious
candidates
for
carrying
out
ORCID
implementa,on.
-­‐
Na,onal
CRISs
such
as
NARCIS
a
poten,ally
very
useful
tool
(plus
CRIS
networks),
CVN
ini,a,ve
in
Spain
could
also
be
used
for
the
purpose
-­‐
Could
IRs
play
a
role
where
no
(na,onal/
ins,tu,onal)
CRISs
are
available

8.
-­‐
Dissemina,on
and
communica,on
efforts
cri,cal
-­‐
Best
prac,ce
iden,fica,on
and
sharing
a
must
-­‐
Authors
need
to
become
aware
of
the
ORCID
ini,a,ve,
so
it
should
be
quite
a
distributed
implementa,on
strategy
even
if
centrally
managed.
-­‐
It
would
be
very
useful
as
a
result
to
have
ORCID
uptake
stats
available
by
countries,
sectors,
disciplines,
even
ins,tu,ons.