Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
NDGeospatialSummit2022 - Learning on the Fly: The MN GIS Response to Bird Flu in 2015 and 2022
1. Learning on the Fly: The MN GIS Response to Bird Flu in 2015 and 2022
Karl Hillstrom | GIS Specialist
2. Topics
• IT Background
• HPAI Background
• Outbreak and Response Comparison of 2015 and 2022
• Lessons Learned and Preparing for the Future
• Questions and Comments
3. IT Background
• 2011: Legislation forms MNIT, a Centralized IT Agency for the state of MN
• 2011 – 2015: Consolidation of IT Services Expands our responsibilities to
include supporting the Board of Animal Health (BAH) in addition to Ag (MDA)
• Late 2014: Joint Incident Management Team between MDA and BAH does
training exercises on Animal Health Emergency Response
• Early 2015: MNIT @ MDA & BAH begins GIS Support for the Minnesota
Poultry Testing Lab
4. HPAI or Bird Flu Background
• Avian influenza (AI) is a disease in domestic poultry, such as
chickens, turkeys, pheasants, quail, ducks and geese.
• Waterfowl and shorebirds are natural hosts for the virus that causes
avian influenza and will shed the virus into their environment while
often showing no signs of illness.
• Some types of avian influenza are called highly pathogenic (HPAI)
because in contrast to waterfowl, these viruses are rapidly fatal for
poultry.
Source: http://www.extension.umn.edu/agriculture/poultry/avian-influenza/index.html
5. USDA Response Overview
1. Quarantine—restricting movement of poultry and poultry-moving
equipment into and out of the control area;
2. Eradicate—humanely euthanizing the affected flock(s);
3. Monitor region—testing wild and domestic birds in a broad area
around the quarantine area;
4. Disinfect—killing the virus in the affected flock locations; and
5. Test—confirming that the poultry farm is AI virus-free.
8. 2015 Outbreak
• March 5th
• An isolated commercial turkey farm in Western MN tests positive for HPAI
• Control Area established
• No commercial premises within 10km
• A few dozen backyard farms
• State Incident Management Team Stood Up
• Every foreign animal disease detection is an emergency, but we had
no idea what was yet to come…
9. 2015 Outbreak
• March 30th:
• Next commercial flock to test positive
• This time in the heart of the Minnesota Poultry Industry
• May 2nd
• 77 Cases
• June 5th
• Last case found
• Total: 108 Cases
13. 2022 Outbreak
• Friday March 25th – Start of the Outbreak
• Saturday March 26th – Long Planned Server and Database Migration
• By April 4th – 22 infected sites
• May 27th – Final Infected Premises of the outbreak identified
• July 1st – GIS Team Officially Offboarded
• 81 Total Premises
• 60 Commercial Premises
• 21 Backyard Premises
14. Data Sources: 2015 vs 2022
2015
• Minnesota Poultry Testing Lab (MPTL)
• Very accurate points
• USDA Emergency Management
Response System (EMRS)
• Points from MPTL loaded
• Many Backyard flocks added
• Syncing back and forth
2022
• MPTL Database migrated to BAH CoreOne
• EMRS Flocks from 2015
• Required updates, but a good start
• Ongoing refinement of both datasets
15. Data Processing: 2015 vs 2022
2015
• Download at 6-8 Spreadsheets twice a day
• Tracking all involved premises
• Post-processing to extrapolate statuses
• Exporting many PDFs and using Sharepoint
• Single restricted Web Map
2022
• Download single Tally Sheet, as needed
• Tally Sheet only has infected Premises
• Leverage points from 2015 for proximity
• PDFs by Request
• Less processing allowing more frequent
updates
16. GIS Products Overview
• Interactive Web Map
• Printed Maps
• Wall maps
• Field maps
• Exam Status Maps (2015 only)
• Geographically informed spreadsheets
Sample Field Map
17. 2015 Interactive Map
• Used mostly by permitting team
to locate premises in relation to
control zones
25. New in 2022
• Tally Sheets streamlined data extraction
• Tiered map access via AGOL
• Internal – Everything
• Industry Partners – Commercial Only
• External Partners – More than industry, less than Internal
• Public Map
• Limited scales for the map and tight scale dependency on service
• Hybrid – In-person and remote EOC
28. Future Improvements
• Better integration into the Onboarding and Off Boarding Process
• Tracking hybrid worker access to web maps
• Find a way to share something more than county level data with the public
• Continue to keep an ear on the ground
• The maps sell themselves, but we still need to make sure people can
access them.
• Work with Situation Unit Leadership to set parameters for data entry
• Accuracy is more important than speed!
29. Acknowledgements
• USDA Veterinary Services
• Minnesota Board of Animal Health
• Minnesota Department of Agriculture
• Minnesota Poultry Testing Lab
• Minnesota IT Services
• Minnesota Turkey Growers Association
• Minnesota Department of Natural Resources – Wildlife Division