SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 26
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
PM Challenge 2009




 “The IBR: Your
 Insurance Policy for
 a Sound Baseline”

Presented by:
Jon Fleming, PMP
MTS, Inc.

Marshall Space Flight Center
Office of Strategic Analysis & Communications (OSAC)
Performance Analysis & Integration Office
(256) 544-0137
jon.fleming@msfc.nasa.gov
Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) Definition

•    A required review led by a Project Manager with support from technical and
     business subject matter experts following contract award to validate the technical,
     schedule, and cost content of the contractor’s Performance Measurement
     Baseline (PMB).




    According to NASA NPR 7120.5D: NASA Space Flight Program &
    Project Management Requirements…
    “Integrated Baseline Review (IBR). A joint assessment by the
    offeror/contractor and the Government to verify the technical content
    and the realism of the related performance budgets, resources and
    schedules. It should provide a mutual understanding of the inherent
    risks in the offerors’/contractors’ performance plans and the
    underlying management control systems, and it should formulate a
    plan to handle these risks.”


                                                                                           2
IBR Objectives… What should be accomplished?

•   Encourages reliable, up-front planning and ensures the PMB is established, well
    understood and is being properly implemented
•   Verify that the integrated technical, cost and schedule baseline captures the
    approved technical scope of work and identifies all deliverables
•   Understand the contractor’s internal Earned Value Management System (EVMS)
•   Gain confidence they are committed to the principles and use of their EVM
    processes, principles, and toolsets
•   Identify unknown risks and develop mitigation plans and schedules to minimize
    negative impacts
•   Gain an understanding of the earned value
    methods for each control account. Determine if
    the methods chosen will provide meaningful
    status/progress data. Are the right methods
    used in the right places?




                                                                                      3
IBR Objectives (Continued)

•   Validate budgeted resources (personnel, material, facilities, skills, etc.) are
    available and adequate to complete assigned tasks in the designated timeframes
•   Fosters an environment to boost stakeholder ownership of the baseline and the
    performance measurement process
•   Verify key project milestones are identified. Validate that realistic detail level
    schedules exist and are executable to accomplish key milestones. Schedules
    must include vertical and horizontal traceability
•   Obtain assurance that the contractor can
    successfully execute the project as planned




         “The IBR Team Must Gain Confidence that the Right People are
         Planning the Right Work at the Right Time with the Right
         Resources”



                                                                                         4
The IBR is NOT...

•   An Inspection, audit, or design review
•   A pass/fail event
      – NASA customer will work with the contractor until all IBR actions are resolved
•   A time to resolve technical issues
•   A demonstration of EVMS compliance
      – EVMS findings will be forwarded to Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) for
        surveillance
•   An opportunity to redirect or change the contract
•   An “Event” but an ongoing “Process”




                                                                                           5
Timing of IBRs… When should it happen?

•   Within 180 days of contract award per NASA FAR Supplement
•   After the planning and budgeting has been completed at the Control Account level
•   When a major contract modification impacts the contractor’s PMB
•   Whenever there is a significant shift in content or time phasing of the PMB




                                                     Approval
     Project Pre-Formulation
             Pre-              Project Formulation                        Project Implementation
           Pre-Phase A
           Pre-                Phase A      Phase B             Phase C     Phase D    Phase E     Phase F

                                                                Project Evaluation




                                                                                                             6
The IBR Team… Who participates?

•   Project Manager
•   IBR Coordinator
•   Review Facilitator
•   Sub-team Technical Leads/Technical Experts
•   Cost/Schedule Analysts
•   DCMA/DCAA
•   Business Office Manager/Support Personnel
•   Contracting Officer/Support Personnel




                                                 7
The IBR Team (Continued)

•   Member Responsibilities:
     – Attend and participate in meetings and training sessions to prepare for the
         documentation and on-site review
     –   Become familiar with the contractor’s control account documentation and any other
         supplementary information provided by the contractor
     –   Understand your assigned role and responsibility in the review and be willing to carry out
         these responsibilities
     –   Be committed to assigned team activities and serve in a professional and responsive
         manner
     –   Prepare and submit findings in a timely manner. Ensure that all findings are
         documented by factual evidence
     –   Assist the Team Lead in the preparation of the out-briefing and final report




              “The multi-functional Team (Technical, Cost, Schedule)
              approach affords the opportunity to leverage knowledge
              and experience”



                                                                                                      8
The IBR Team (Continued)

•   Project Manager (Team Leader or Review Director)
     – Conducts an in-brief on the goals & objectives of the IBR
     – Serves as overall director of team’s activities with ultimate responsibility for the final
         assessment of the PMB
     –   Oversees and approves activities associated with the review (team planning, review
         schedules, meeting agendas, etc.)
     –   Ensures team is staffed with qualified technical/business/program control personnel
         and approves team technical review assignments
     –   Serves as final authority for problems/discrepancies which may arise during the
         review
     –   Oversees development and coordination of the out-briefing to document review
         findings
     –   Conducts an out-briefing at the conclusion of the IBR
•   IBR Coordinator
     –   Coordinated logistics for the IBR
     –   Prepare the IBR Team Handbook
     –   Assist with training, data collection, meetings, etc.
     –   Collect forms, maintain IBR log, and support the PM during the IBR.

                                                                                                    9
The IBR Team (Continued)

•   Review Facilitator
     –   Supports the PM as required in activities related to planning and conducting the IBR
     –   Provides IBR training
     –   Participate in baseline discussions
     –   Assess resources and schedule risk
     –   Provides overall guidance in the discipline of EVM to team members
     –   Achieve mutual understanding of baseline with counterparts
     –   Resolve differences or document any concerns or issues
     –   Document results for follow-up actions
•   Sub-Team Technical Lead/Technical Experts
     – Lead and conduct baseline discussions
     – Assess technical, resources, and schedule risk
     – Achieve mutual understanding of baseline with
         contractor counterpart
     –   Resolve differences or document concerns
         and issues




                                                                                                10
The IBR Team (Continued)

•   Cost/Schedule Analysts
     –   Assess resources and schedule risk
     –   Participate in baseline discussions
     –   Understand EV methodologies chosen
     –   Assess completeness of work allocation
     –   Achieve mutual understanding of baseline with
         contractor counterpart
     –   Resolve differences or document concerns or
         issues
     –   Report to team leader daily
     –   Document results for future action
•   DCMA/DCAA
     – Invited to participate in the IBR, particularly at the
         in-brief, but there is no specific role for them
         during the IBR
     –   Provides surveillance of the validated EVMS




                                                                11
IBR Team Responsibilities - Understand Project Risk


   TECHNICAL                                          SCHEDULE/COST
  • Tech Specs                                        •   WBS
  • Tech Work                                         •   RAM
    Assignments                                       •   IMS
  • Tech                                              •   PMB
    Reviews/Milestones                                •   EVMS
  • Tech Plan
  • Exit Criteria

                         •   Technical Content
                         •   Schedule Achievability
                         •   Budget Validity
                         •   Project RISK



                                  The result:
                              PMB Confidence

                                                                      12
Typical IBR Information Requirements
•   Statement of Work (SOW), including major deliverables
•   Contract dollar value, period of performance, etc.
•   Work Authorization Document (WAD)
•   Dollarized Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM)
•   Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) & WBS Dictionary
•   Organizational Breakdown Structure (OBS)
•   Time-phased resource loaded Control Account Plan (CAP) Sheets
•   Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) with critical path identified
•   Contract Performance Report (CPR) Earned Value data (Status-to-date for cost, schedule
    and performance)
•   Project Implementation Plan, including assumptions
•   Already identified risks and mitigation plans
•   Management Reserve (plan and basis)
•   Schedule Contingency (plan and basis)
•   Issues and challenges
•   Current Contractor EVMS Description/NASA Integrated Program Management Directives
•   LOE % vs. Discrete % at the Contract WBS Reporting Level



                                                                                             13
Example IBR Team Handbook Contents
•   Agenda
•   Team Assignments/Interview Schedule
•   Statement of Work
•   WBS Dictionary
•   WBS
•   OBS
•   Dollarized RAM
•   Control Account Manager (CAM) Findings
•   IMS Findings (Health Check)
•   EVMS System Description
•   Discussion Guidelines
•   Sample Questions
•   Documentation Guidelines
•   Sample Documentation
•   Known/Identified Project Risks and Risk Evaluation
    Criteria
•   Glossary of Terms




                                                         14
Traditional NASA IBR Approach

•   Pre-IBR Activities
      – Phase 1    (45 days prior to IBR)
      – Phase 2    (3 weeks prior to IBR)

•   On-site IBR Activities
      – Phase 3    (Typically 2 – 3 days)

•   Post-IBR Activities
      – Phase 4    (Within 30 days after IBR)




                                                15
Traditional NASA IBR Approach (Continued)

•   Pre-IBR Activities – Phase 1 (45 days prior to IBR)
     –   Send Notification Letter to contractor
     –   Begin identification of NASA review team members
     –   Coordinate review dates with contractor
     –   Identify and review contractor’s WBS
     –   Collect sample contractor EVMS and Control Account
         documents
     –   Develop NASA IBR team orientation
     –   Customized IBR training materials and develop training
         schedule




                                                                  16
Traditional NASA IBR Approach (Continued)

•   Pre-IBR Activities – Phase 2 (3 weeks prior to IBR)
      –   Finalize the review team
      –   Provide IBR training to the team as appropriate
      –   Provide team with latest project analysis
      –   Assign WBS review teams
      –   Ensure a preliminary review has been done of specific project
          documentation for each sub-team
      –   Finalize IBR agenda
      –   Distribute the IBR Handbook to team members
      –   Finalize the list of CAM’s to be interviewed
      –   Conduct mock CAM interview




                                                                          17
Traditional NASA IBR Approach (Continued)

•   On-site IBR Activities – Phase 3 (Typically 2 - 3 days)
     –   Conduct IBR in-brief
     –   Review of internal documentation, as necessary
     –   Conduct CAM discussions and project team interviews
     –   CAM discussions will include:
         •   Technical content of Control Accounts and Work Packages
         •   Integration of the Control Account schedules with the IMS
         •   Application of sufficient resources (labor, materials, subs) to the scheduled work
         •   Identification of risk elements contained within the Control Accounts
         •   Discussion Assessment Form
              filled out for each Control Account
         •   Potential concerns recorded in the
              IBR Concern Area Report (CAR) Form
         •   Potential risks should be documented
              on the Risk Assessment Form




                                                                                                  18
Traditional NASA IBR Approach (Continued)

•   On-site IBR Activities – Phase 3 (Continued)
      – IBR Concern Area Reports and Risk Assessment Forms are given to the Review
          Director for consideration and consolidation
      –   Document results of CAM discussions
      –   Identify, document, and assign action items
      –   Prepare out-brief of results, with follow-up action items
      –   Brief the contractor of results, providing action items if required




                                                                                     19
Traditional NASA IBR Approach (continued)

•   Post-IBR Activities – Phase 4 (Within 30 days after)
      – Documentation
           •   IBR results are reported in a formal Review Letter
           •   Letter should include action items and corrective actions
      – Monitor action item progress to closure




                                                                           20
Example CAM Notebooks Contents

•   Statement of Work
•   WBS
•   WBS Dictionary
•   OBS
•   Dollarized RAM
•   Summary Schedules
•   Detailed Schedules
•   WAD
•   CAP Sheets
•   Others




          Note: Can be electronic or hardcopy notebooks.




                                                           21
CAM Discussion

•   Prepare – Prepare – Prepare
•   Government technical lead is in charge of the discussion
•   Conduct of the Discussion
      – Sit beside the CAM. Sitting across the table creates more of a
          confrontational atmosphere
      –   Start on time
      –   Appoint a scribe from the government team to document the discussion.
          All requests for additional documentation, newly identified risks/cost
          avoidance opportunities, and CAR’s should be recorded
      –   Have attendees introduce themselves and
          state their purpose for attending. This is not
          a general audience forum. Attendance should
          be limited to those having a vested interest
      –   Set the stage for a discussion/conversation
          rather than for an interview. ‘Break the ice’.
          Give the CAM an opportunity to relax




                                                                                   22
CAM Discussion (Continued)

•   Conduct of the Discussion (Continued)
      – Summarize what you intend to cover and your end goals for the discussion
      – Limit distractions – ask attendees to turn off cell phones. CAM should limit
          interruptions from his admin staff
      –   Maintain control of the interview. Provide opportunities for others to ask questions
          (may be during the interview or at the end)
      –   Phrase questions that will require a detailed response. Avoid questions that may lead
          to a Yes/No response.
      –   Ensure CAM (not the support team) answers the questions. The CAM’s support team
          may provide additional/supporting detail when requested by the discussion lead. If
          the CAM’s answer is ill-defined or unclear, continue to probe with additional questions
          in the area of concern.
      –   Use “Show me” statements versus “tell me” statements. Have the CAM show
          answers in his CAM Notebook




                                                                                                    23
CAM Discussion (Continued)

•   Conduct of the Discussion (Continued)
      – Use the questionnaire as a ‘guide’ to assist you through the discussion. Identify and
          prioritize your questions before the discussion.
      –   At the end of the interview discuss any follow-up actions and potential CARs
      –   Don’t make derogatory comments
      –   Don’t Allow the discussion to turn into a technical problem resolution session
•   Remember the CAM and his team expended time and energy to prepare and host
    the discussion. Express thanks to the CAM and their team.




                                                                                                24
Typical CAM Discussion Problems

•   Expectations not clearly defined
•   Little or no advance preparation
•   Key project personnel are new or not knowledgeable
•   “Yes/No” responses without suitable detail backup
•   Participants distracted or unfocused
•   Discussion not held in a conducive environment (too small to accommodate the
    team, not convenient for CAM to retrieve additional documentation, escort required
    or unavailable, etc)
•   Information / documentation not available for early review
•   Interruptions (phones, people, beepers)
•   “Strap-hangers” outnumber participants
•   CAM is not prepared / familiar with documentation
•   CAM’s support team answers all the questions
•   “Tells You” versus “Shows You”
•   “I am an engineer …not a bean counter”


                                                                                     25
Summary

•   The IBR is an event, however the purpose and objectives should be viewed as a
    continuing process
•   The purpose of an IBR is to achieve a mutual understanding of the risks inherent
    on the PMB and the management control processes that will operate during
    execution
•   IBR preparation and planning are the key to a successful review
•   A PMB that is complete and documented at the appropriate level of detail is a key
    element for project management to successfully achieve project objectives
•   Anything that does not support the purpose should be moved outside the review
•   Evaluate the integrated PMB to determine whether it, captures the entire scope of
    work, is consistent with authorizing documents, and has adequate resources to
    meet schedule requirement and planned project tasks
•   Document findings and concerns for corrective action




http://evm.nasa.gov

                                                                                        26

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Mahmood porter
Mahmood porterMahmood porter
Mahmood porterNASAPMC
 
Use Of Schedule Logs 2012 Pmi Scop Conference
Use Of Schedule Logs   2012 Pmi Scop ConferenceUse Of Schedule Logs   2012 Pmi Scop Conference
Use Of Schedule Logs 2012 Pmi Scop ConferenceChris Carson
 
Amer.tahani
Amer.tahaniAmer.tahani
Amer.tahaniNASAPMC
 
Dealing With A Schedule That Cannot Be Approved - AACE 2012 Meeting
Dealing With A Schedule That Cannot Be Approved - AACE 2012 MeetingDealing With A Schedule That Cannot Be Approved - AACE 2012 Meeting
Dealing With A Schedule That Cannot Be Approved - AACE 2012 MeetingChris Carson
 
Sally.godfrey
Sally.godfrey Sally.godfrey
Sally.godfrey NASAPMC
 
Sandra smalley
Sandra smalleySandra smalley
Sandra smalleyNASAPMC
 
Randall.taylor
Randall.taylorRandall.taylor
Randall.taylorNASAPMC
 
Can A Subcontractor Have CP Delay When The Gc Does Not
Can A Subcontractor Have CP Delay When The Gc Does NotCan A Subcontractor Have CP Delay When The Gc Does Not
Can A Subcontractor Have CP Delay When The Gc Does NotChris Carson
 
Use Of A Claims Triage Workshop To Choose An Analysis Method
Use Of A Claims Triage Workshop To Choose An Analysis MethodUse Of A Claims Triage Workshop To Choose An Analysis Method
Use Of A Claims Triage Workshop To Choose An Analysis MethodChris Carson
 
Humphreys.gary
Humphreys.garyHumphreys.gary
Humphreys.garyNASAPMC
 
Val.lunz
Val.lunzVal.lunz
Val.lunzNASAPMC
 
K.pagel.beene
K.pagel.beeneK.pagel.beene
K.pagel.beeneNASAPMC
 
Thomas.a.greathouse.r
Thomas.a.greathouse.rThomas.a.greathouse.r
Thomas.a.greathouse.rNASAPMC
 
Thomas.coonce
Thomas.coonceThomas.coonce
Thomas.coonceNASAPMC
 
Blythe ortiz7120 5e handbooks 2 15-2012 final
Blythe ortiz7120 5e handbooks 2 15-2012 finalBlythe ortiz7120 5e handbooks 2 15-2012 final
Blythe ortiz7120 5e handbooks 2 15-2012 finalNASAPMC
 
Jerald kerby
Jerald kerbyJerald kerby
Jerald kerbyNASAPMC
 
R simpson elee
R simpson eleeR simpson elee
R simpson eleeNASAPMC
 
Solomon.paul
Solomon.paulSolomon.paul
Solomon.paulNASAPMC
 
Baseline Schedules 2
Baseline Schedules 2Baseline Schedules 2
Baseline Schedules 2Chris Carson
 
Ken poole
Ken pooleKen poole
Ken pooleNASAPMC
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Mahmood porter
Mahmood porterMahmood porter
Mahmood porter
 
Use Of Schedule Logs 2012 Pmi Scop Conference
Use Of Schedule Logs   2012 Pmi Scop ConferenceUse Of Schedule Logs   2012 Pmi Scop Conference
Use Of Schedule Logs 2012 Pmi Scop Conference
 
Amer.tahani
Amer.tahaniAmer.tahani
Amer.tahani
 
Dealing With A Schedule That Cannot Be Approved - AACE 2012 Meeting
Dealing With A Schedule That Cannot Be Approved - AACE 2012 MeetingDealing With A Schedule That Cannot Be Approved - AACE 2012 Meeting
Dealing With A Schedule That Cannot Be Approved - AACE 2012 Meeting
 
Sally.godfrey
Sally.godfrey Sally.godfrey
Sally.godfrey
 
Sandra smalley
Sandra smalleySandra smalley
Sandra smalley
 
Randall.taylor
Randall.taylorRandall.taylor
Randall.taylor
 
Can A Subcontractor Have CP Delay When The Gc Does Not
Can A Subcontractor Have CP Delay When The Gc Does NotCan A Subcontractor Have CP Delay When The Gc Does Not
Can A Subcontractor Have CP Delay When The Gc Does Not
 
Use Of A Claims Triage Workshop To Choose An Analysis Method
Use Of A Claims Triage Workshop To Choose An Analysis MethodUse Of A Claims Triage Workshop To Choose An Analysis Method
Use Of A Claims Triage Workshop To Choose An Analysis Method
 
Humphreys.gary
Humphreys.garyHumphreys.gary
Humphreys.gary
 
Val.lunz
Val.lunzVal.lunz
Val.lunz
 
K.pagel.beene
K.pagel.beeneK.pagel.beene
K.pagel.beene
 
Thomas.a.greathouse.r
Thomas.a.greathouse.rThomas.a.greathouse.r
Thomas.a.greathouse.r
 
Thomas.coonce
Thomas.coonceThomas.coonce
Thomas.coonce
 
Blythe ortiz7120 5e handbooks 2 15-2012 final
Blythe ortiz7120 5e handbooks 2 15-2012 finalBlythe ortiz7120 5e handbooks 2 15-2012 final
Blythe ortiz7120 5e handbooks 2 15-2012 final
 
Jerald kerby
Jerald kerbyJerald kerby
Jerald kerby
 
R simpson elee
R simpson eleeR simpson elee
R simpson elee
 
Solomon.paul
Solomon.paulSolomon.paul
Solomon.paul
 
Baseline Schedules 2
Baseline Schedules 2Baseline Schedules 2
Baseline Schedules 2
 
Ken poole
Ken pooleKen poole
Ken poole
 

Andere mochten auch

Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis
Infectious bovine rhinotracheitisInfectious bovine rhinotracheitis
Infectious bovine rhinotracheitisAlex Vet
 
John.emond
John.emondJohn.emond
John.emondNASAPMC
 
Wienkoop.glenn
Wienkoop.glennWienkoop.glenn
Wienkoop.glennNASAPMC
 
Battista barlowpmc conference 2012 rev. 2
Battista barlowpmc conference 2012 rev. 2Battista barlowpmc conference 2012 rev. 2
Battista barlowpmc conference 2012 rev. 2NASAPMC
 
Inter pech bounds
Inter pech boundsInter pech bounds
Inter pech boundsNASAPMC
 
Debbie.dusterwald
Debbie.dusterwaldDebbie.dusterwald
Debbie.dusterwaldNASAPMC
 
Dillon.r.tinsley.c.rogers.e
Dillon.r.tinsley.c.rogers.eDillon.r.tinsley.c.rogers.e
Dillon.r.tinsley.c.rogers.eNASAPMC
 
Patrick.guske.update
Patrick.guske.updatePatrick.guske.update
Patrick.guske.updateNASAPMC
 
Kirsch.mike
Kirsch.mikeKirsch.mike
Kirsch.mikeNASAPMC
 
Grubbs teams and digital collaboration pmc2012
Grubbs teams and digital collaboration pmc2012Grubbs teams and digital collaboration pmc2012
Grubbs teams and digital collaboration pmc2012NASAPMC
 
Bauer.frank
Bauer.frankBauer.frank
Bauer.frankNASAPMC
 
John.olson
John.olsonJohn.olson
John.olsonNASAPMC
 
Stacy.cusack
Stacy.cusackStacy.cusack
Stacy.cusackNASAPMC
 
Serrato.be be
Serrato.be beSerrato.be be
Serrato.be beNASAPMC
 
B ackroyd
B ackroydB ackroyd
B ackroydNASAPMC
 
Neiberding
NeiberdingNeiberding
NeiberdingNASAPMC
 
Patrick.guske.update
Patrick.guske.updatePatrick.guske.update
Patrick.guske.updateNASAPMC
 
Michael.aucoin
Michael.aucoinMichael.aucoin
Michael.aucoinNASAPMC
 
Brockhurst.lane
Brockhurst.laneBrockhurst.lane
Brockhurst.laneNASAPMC
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis
Infectious bovine rhinotracheitisInfectious bovine rhinotracheitis
Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis
 
John.emond
John.emondJohn.emond
John.emond
 
Wienkoop.glenn
Wienkoop.glennWienkoop.glenn
Wienkoop.glenn
 
Battista barlowpmc conference 2012 rev. 2
Battista barlowpmc conference 2012 rev. 2Battista barlowpmc conference 2012 rev. 2
Battista barlowpmc conference 2012 rev. 2
 
Inter pech bounds
Inter pech boundsInter pech bounds
Inter pech bounds
 
Debbie.dusterwald
Debbie.dusterwaldDebbie.dusterwald
Debbie.dusterwald
 
Dillon.r.tinsley.c.rogers.e
Dillon.r.tinsley.c.rogers.eDillon.r.tinsley.c.rogers.e
Dillon.r.tinsley.c.rogers.e
 
Patrick.guske.update
Patrick.guske.updatePatrick.guske.update
Patrick.guske.update
 
Kirsch.mike
Kirsch.mikeKirsch.mike
Kirsch.mike
 
Grubbs teams and digital collaboration pmc2012
Grubbs teams and digital collaboration pmc2012Grubbs teams and digital collaboration pmc2012
Grubbs teams and digital collaboration pmc2012
 
Bauer.frank
Bauer.frankBauer.frank
Bauer.frank
 
John.olson
John.olsonJohn.olson
John.olson
 
Heard
HeardHeard
Heard
 
Stacy.cusack
Stacy.cusackStacy.cusack
Stacy.cusack
 
Serrato.be be
Serrato.be beSerrato.be be
Serrato.be be
 
B ackroyd
B ackroydB ackroyd
B ackroyd
 
Neiberding
NeiberdingNeiberding
Neiberding
 
Patrick.guske.update
Patrick.guske.updatePatrick.guske.update
Patrick.guske.update
 
Michael.aucoin
Michael.aucoinMichael.aucoin
Michael.aucoin
 
Brockhurst.lane
Brockhurst.laneBrockhurst.lane
Brockhurst.lane
 

Ähnlich wie Fleming.jon

Ähnlich wie Fleming.jon (20)

Intergrated baseline reviews as a tool in assurance
Intergrated baseline reviews as a tool in assurance Intergrated baseline reviews as a tool in assurance
Intergrated baseline reviews as a tool in assurance
 
Ipao great houseetc-programmatic analysis ll
Ipao great houseetc-programmatic analysis llIpao great houseetc-programmatic analysis ll
Ipao great houseetc-programmatic analysis ll
 
Jim.cassidy
Jim.cassidyJim.cassidy
Jim.cassidy
 
Flevy.com - Pricing a Consulting Project
Flevy.com - Pricing a Consulting ProjectFlevy.com - Pricing a Consulting Project
Flevy.com - Pricing a Consulting Project
 
C armstrong tbyers
C armstrong tbyersC armstrong tbyers
C armstrong tbyers
 
Mitigation And Performance Recovery Using Earned Value
Mitigation And Performance Recovery Using Earned ValueMitigation And Performance Recovery Using Earned Value
Mitigation And Performance Recovery Using Earned Value
 
Project Management - principles, practice and process
Project Management - principles, practice and process Project Management - principles, practice and process
Project Management - principles, practice and process
 
Scrum Process For Offshore Team
Scrum Process For Offshore TeamScrum Process For Offshore Team
Scrum Process For Offshore Team
 
Resume
ResumeResume
Resume
 
T356
T356T356
T356
 
ERP II Overview.ppt
ERP II Overview.pptERP II Overview.ppt
ERP II Overview.ppt
 
T349
T349T349
T349
 
T349 Pi Web
T349 Pi WebT349 Pi Web
T349 Pi Web
 
PME UNIT-3.pptx
PME UNIT-3.pptxPME UNIT-3.pptx
PME UNIT-3.pptx
 
Project management-practices
Project management-practicesProject management-practices
Project management-practices
 
Humphreys.gary
Humphreys.garyHumphreys.gary
Humphreys.gary
 
pmppgoav14.ppt
pmppgoav14.pptpmppgoav14.ppt
pmppgoav14.ppt
 
Projects2016_Franks_Top10ReasonsProjectsFail
Projects2016_Franks_Top10ReasonsProjectsFailProjects2016_Franks_Top10ReasonsProjectsFail
Projects2016_Franks_Top10ReasonsProjectsFail
 
Making of Stakeholders Delight
Making of Stakeholders DelightMaking of Stakeholders Delight
Making of Stakeholders Delight
 
Making of Stakeholders Delight
Making of Stakeholders Delight Making of Stakeholders Delight
Making of Stakeholders Delight
 

Mehr von NASAPMC

Bejmuk bo
Bejmuk boBejmuk bo
Bejmuk boNASAPMC
 
Baniszewski john
Baniszewski johnBaniszewski john
Baniszewski johnNASAPMC
 
Yew manson
Yew mansonYew manson
Yew mansonNASAPMC
 
Wood frank
Wood frankWood frank
Wood frankNASAPMC
 
Wood frank
Wood frankWood frank
Wood frankNASAPMC
 
Wessen randi (cd)
Wessen randi (cd)Wessen randi (cd)
Wessen randi (cd)NASAPMC
 
Vellinga joe
Vellinga joeVellinga joe
Vellinga joeNASAPMC
 
Trahan stuart
Trahan stuartTrahan stuart
Trahan stuartNASAPMC
 
Stock gahm
Stock gahmStock gahm
Stock gahmNASAPMC
 
Snow lee
Snow leeSnow lee
Snow leeNASAPMC
 
Smalley sandra
Smalley sandraSmalley sandra
Smalley sandraNASAPMC
 
Seftas krage
Seftas krageSeftas krage
Seftas krageNASAPMC
 
Sampietro marco
Sampietro marcoSampietro marco
Sampietro marcoNASAPMC
 
Rudolphi mike
Rudolphi mikeRudolphi mike
Rudolphi mikeNASAPMC
 
Roberts karlene
Roberts karleneRoberts karlene
Roberts karleneNASAPMC
 
Rackley mike
Rackley mikeRackley mike
Rackley mikeNASAPMC
 
Paradis william
Paradis williamParadis william
Paradis williamNASAPMC
 
Osterkamp jeff
Osterkamp jeffOsterkamp jeff
Osterkamp jeffNASAPMC
 
O'keefe william
O'keefe williamO'keefe william
O'keefe williamNASAPMC
 
Muller ralf
Muller ralfMuller ralf
Muller ralfNASAPMC
 

Mehr von NASAPMC (20)

Bejmuk bo
Bejmuk boBejmuk bo
Bejmuk bo
 
Baniszewski john
Baniszewski johnBaniszewski john
Baniszewski john
 
Yew manson
Yew mansonYew manson
Yew manson
 
Wood frank
Wood frankWood frank
Wood frank
 
Wood frank
Wood frankWood frank
Wood frank
 
Wessen randi (cd)
Wessen randi (cd)Wessen randi (cd)
Wessen randi (cd)
 
Vellinga joe
Vellinga joeVellinga joe
Vellinga joe
 
Trahan stuart
Trahan stuartTrahan stuart
Trahan stuart
 
Stock gahm
Stock gahmStock gahm
Stock gahm
 
Snow lee
Snow leeSnow lee
Snow lee
 
Smalley sandra
Smalley sandraSmalley sandra
Smalley sandra
 
Seftas krage
Seftas krageSeftas krage
Seftas krage
 
Sampietro marco
Sampietro marcoSampietro marco
Sampietro marco
 
Rudolphi mike
Rudolphi mikeRudolphi mike
Rudolphi mike
 
Roberts karlene
Roberts karleneRoberts karlene
Roberts karlene
 
Rackley mike
Rackley mikeRackley mike
Rackley mike
 
Paradis william
Paradis williamParadis william
Paradis william
 
Osterkamp jeff
Osterkamp jeffOsterkamp jeff
Osterkamp jeff
 
O'keefe william
O'keefe williamO'keefe william
O'keefe william
 
Muller ralf
Muller ralfMuller ralf
Muller ralf
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationGenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationMichael W. Hawkins
 
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...Neo4j
 
Advantages of Hiring UIUX Design Service Providers for Your Business
Advantages of Hiring UIUX Design Service Providers for Your BusinessAdvantages of Hiring UIUX Design Service Providers for Your Business
Advantages of Hiring UIUX Design Service Providers for Your BusinessPixlogix Infotech
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...apidays
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAndrey Devyatkin
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationRadu Cotescu
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoffsammart93
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Miguel Araújo
 
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdfTech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdfhans926745
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobeapidays
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc
 
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationFrom Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationSafe Software
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfsudhanshuwaghmare1
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonAnna Loughnan Colquhoun
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)Gabriella Davis
 
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptxHampshireHUG
 
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CVReal Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CVKhem
 
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...Drew Madelung
 
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of BrazilDeveloping An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of BrazilV3cube
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationGenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
 
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
 
Advantages of Hiring UIUX Design Service Providers for Your Business
Advantages of Hiring UIUX Design Service Providers for Your BusinessAdvantages of Hiring UIUX Design Service Providers for Your Business
Advantages of Hiring UIUX Design Service Providers for Your Business
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
 
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdfTech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationFrom Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
 
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
 
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
 
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CVReal Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
 
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
 
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of BrazilDeveloping An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
 

Fleming.jon

  • 1. PM Challenge 2009 “The IBR: Your Insurance Policy for a Sound Baseline” Presented by: Jon Fleming, PMP MTS, Inc. Marshall Space Flight Center Office of Strategic Analysis & Communications (OSAC) Performance Analysis & Integration Office (256) 544-0137 jon.fleming@msfc.nasa.gov
  • 2. Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) Definition • A required review led by a Project Manager with support from technical and business subject matter experts following contract award to validate the technical, schedule, and cost content of the contractor’s Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB). According to NASA NPR 7120.5D: NASA Space Flight Program & Project Management Requirements… “Integrated Baseline Review (IBR). A joint assessment by the offeror/contractor and the Government to verify the technical content and the realism of the related performance budgets, resources and schedules. It should provide a mutual understanding of the inherent risks in the offerors’/contractors’ performance plans and the underlying management control systems, and it should formulate a plan to handle these risks.” 2
  • 3. IBR Objectives… What should be accomplished? • Encourages reliable, up-front planning and ensures the PMB is established, well understood and is being properly implemented • Verify that the integrated technical, cost and schedule baseline captures the approved technical scope of work and identifies all deliverables • Understand the contractor’s internal Earned Value Management System (EVMS) • Gain confidence they are committed to the principles and use of their EVM processes, principles, and toolsets • Identify unknown risks and develop mitigation plans and schedules to minimize negative impacts • Gain an understanding of the earned value methods for each control account. Determine if the methods chosen will provide meaningful status/progress data. Are the right methods used in the right places? 3
  • 4. IBR Objectives (Continued) • Validate budgeted resources (personnel, material, facilities, skills, etc.) are available and adequate to complete assigned tasks in the designated timeframes • Fosters an environment to boost stakeholder ownership of the baseline and the performance measurement process • Verify key project milestones are identified. Validate that realistic detail level schedules exist and are executable to accomplish key milestones. Schedules must include vertical and horizontal traceability • Obtain assurance that the contractor can successfully execute the project as planned “The IBR Team Must Gain Confidence that the Right People are Planning the Right Work at the Right Time with the Right Resources” 4
  • 5. The IBR is NOT... • An Inspection, audit, or design review • A pass/fail event – NASA customer will work with the contractor until all IBR actions are resolved • A time to resolve technical issues • A demonstration of EVMS compliance – EVMS findings will be forwarded to Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) for surveillance • An opportunity to redirect or change the contract • An “Event” but an ongoing “Process” 5
  • 6. Timing of IBRs… When should it happen? • Within 180 days of contract award per NASA FAR Supplement • After the planning and budgeting has been completed at the Control Account level • When a major contract modification impacts the contractor’s PMB • Whenever there is a significant shift in content or time phasing of the PMB Approval Project Pre-Formulation Pre- Project Formulation Project Implementation Pre-Phase A Pre- Phase A Phase B Phase C Phase D Phase E Phase F Project Evaluation 6
  • 7. The IBR Team… Who participates? • Project Manager • IBR Coordinator • Review Facilitator • Sub-team Technical Leads/Technical Experts • Cost/Schedule Analysts • DCMA/DCAA • Business Office Manager/Support Personnel • Contracting Officer/Support Personnel 7
  • 8. The IBR Team (Continued) • Member Responsibilities: – Attend and participate in meetings and training sessions to prepare for the documentation and on-site review – Become familiar with the contractor’s control account documentation and any other supplementary information provided by the contractor – Understand your assigned role and responsibility in the review and be willing to carry out these responsibilities – Be committed to assigned team activities and serve in a professional and responsive manner – Prepare and submit findings in a timely manner. Ensure that all findings are documented by factual evidence – Assist the Team Lead in the preparation of the out-briefing and final report “The multi-functional Team (Technical, Cost, Schedule) approach affords the opportunity to leverage knowledge and experience” 8
  • 9. The IBR Team (Continued) • Project Manager (Team Leader or Review Director) – Conducts an in-brief on the goals & objectives of the IBR – Serves as overall director of team’s activities with ultimate responsibility for the final assessment of the PMB – Oversees and approves activities associated with the review (team planning, review schedules, meeting agendas, etc.) – Ensures team is staffed with qualified technical/business/program control personnel and approves team technical review assignments – Serves as final authority for problems/discrepancies which may arise during the review – Oversees development and coordination of the out-briefing to document review findings – Conducts an out-briefing at the conclusion of the IBR • IBR Coordinator – Coordinated logistics for the IBR – Prepare the IBR Team Handbook – Assist with training, data collection, meetings, etc. – Collect forms, maintain IBR log, and support the PM during the IBR. 9
  • 10. The IBR Team (Continued) • Review Facilitator – Supports the PM as required in activities related to planning and conducting the IBR – Provides IBR training – Participate in baseline discussions – Assess resources and schedule risk – Provides overall guidance in the discipline of EVM to team members – Achieve mutual understanding of baseline with counterparts – Resolve differences or document any concerns or issues – Document results for follow-up actions • Sub-Team Technical Lead/Technical Experts – Lead and conduct baseline discussions – Assess technical, resources, and schedule risk – Achieve mutual understanding of baseline with contractor counterpart – Resolve differences or document concerns and issues 10
  • 11. The IBR Team (Continued) • Cost/Schedule Analysts – Assess resources and schedule risk – Participate in baseline discussions – Understand EV methodologies chosen – Assess completeness of work allocation – Achieve mutual understanding of baseline with contractor counterpart – Resolve differences or document concerns or issues – Report to team leader daily – Document results for future action • DCMA/DCAA – Invited to participate in the IBR, particularly at the in-brief, but there is no specific role for them during the IBR – Provides surveillance of the validated EVMS 11
  • 12. IBR Team Responsibilities - Understand Project Risk TECHNICAL SCHEDULE/COST • Tech Specs • WBS • Tech Work • RAM Assignments • IMS • Tech • PMB Reviews/Milestones • EVMS • Tech Plan • Exit Criteria • Technical Content • Schedule Achievability • Budget Validity • Project RISK The result: PMB Confidence 12
  • 13. Typical IBR Information Requirements • Statement of Work (SOW), including major deliverables • Contract dollar value, period of performance, etc. • Work Authorization Document (WAD) • Dollarized Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM) • Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) & WBS Dictionary • Organizational Breakdown Structure (OBS) • Time-phased resource loaded Control Account Plan (CAP) Sheets • Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) with critical path identified • Contract Performance Report (CPR) Earned Value data (Status-to-date for cost, schedule and performance) • Project Implementation Plan, including assumptions • Already identified risks and mitigation plans • Management Reserve (plan and basis) • Schedule Contingency (plan and basis) • Issues and challenges • Current Contractor EVMS Description/NASA Integrated Program Management Directives • LOE % vs. Discrete % at the Contract WBS Reporting Level 13
  • 14. Example IBR Team Handbook Contents • Agenda • Team Assignments/Interview Schedule • Statement of Work • WBS Dictionary • WBS • OBS • Dollarized RAM • Control Account Manager (CAM) Findings • IMS Findings (Health Check) • EVMS System Description • Discussion Guidelines • Sample Questions • Documentation Guidelines • Sample Documentation • Known/Identified Project Risks and Risk Evaluation Criteria • Glossary of Terms 14
  • 15. Traditional NASA IBR Approach • Pre-IBR Activities – Phase 1 (45 days prior to IBR) – Phase 2 (3 weeks prior to IBR) • On-site IBR Activities – Phase 3 (Typically 2 – 3 days) • Post-IBR Activities – Phase 4 (Within 30 days after IBR) 15
  • 16. Traditional NASA IBR Approach (Continued) • Pre-IBR Activities – Phase 1 (45 days prior to IBR) – Send Notification Letter to contractor – Begin identification of NASA review team members – Coordinate review dates with contractor – Identify and review contractor’s WBS – Collect sample contractor EVMS and Control Account documents – Develop NASA IBR team orientation – Customized IBR training materials and develop training schedule 16
  • 17. Traditional NASA IBR Approach (Continued) • Pre-IBR Activities – Phase 2 (3 weeks prior to IBR) – Finalize the review team – Provide IBR training to the team as appropriate – Provide team with latest project analysis – Assign WBS review teams – Ensure a preliminary review has been done of specific project documentation for each sub-team – Finalize IBR agenda – Distribute the IBR Handbook to team members – Finalize the list of CAM’s to be interviewed – Conduct mock CAM interview 17
  • 18. Traditional NASA IBR Approach (Continued) • On-site IBR Activities – Phase 3 (Typically 2 - 3 days) – Conduct IBR in-brief – Review of internal documentation, as necessary – Conduct CAM discussions and project team interviews – CAM discussions will include: • Technical content of Control Accounts and Work Packages • Integration of the Control Account schedules with the IMS • Application of sufficient resources (labor, materials, subs) to the scheduled work • Identification of risk elements contained within the Control Accounts • Discussion Assessment Form filled out for each Control Account • Potential concerns recorded in the IBR Concern Area Report (CAR) Form • Potential risks should be documented on the Risk Assessment Form 18
  • 19. Traditional NASA IBR Approach (Continued) • On-site IBR Activities – Phase 3 (Continued) – IBR Concern Area Reports and Risk Assessment Forms are given to the Review Director for consideration and consolidation – Document results of CAM discussions – Identify, document, and assign action items – Prepare out-brief of results, with follow-up action items – Brief the contractor of results, providing action items if required 19
  • 20. Traditional NASA IBR Approach (continued) • Post-IBR Activities – Phase 4 (Within 30 days after) – Documentation • IBR results are reported in a formal Review Letter • Letter should include action items and corrective actions – Monitor action item progress to closure 20
  • 21. Example CAM Notebooks Contents • Statement of Work • WBS • WBS Dictionary • OBS • Dollarized RAM • Summary Schedules • Detailed Schedules • WAD • CAP Sheets • Others Note: Can be electronic or hardcopy notebooks. 21
  • 22. CAM Discussion • Prepare – Prepare – Prepare • Government technical lead is in charge of the discussion • Conduct of the Discussion – Sit beside the CAM. Sitting across the table creates more of a confrontational atmosphere – Start on time – Appoint a scribe from the government team to document the discussion. All requests for additional documentation, newly identified risks/cost avoidance opportunities, and CAR’s should be recorded – Have attendees introduce themselves and state their purpose for attending. This is not a general audience forum. Attendance should be limited to those having a vested interest – Set the stage for a discussion/conversation rather than for an interview. ‘Break the ice’. Give the CAM an opportunity to relax 22
  • 23. CAM Discussion (Continued) • Conduct of the Discussion (Continued) – Summarize what you intend to cover and your end goals for the discussion – Limit distractions – ask attendees to turn off cell phones. CAM should limit interruptions from his admin staff – Maintain control of the interview. Provide opportunities for others to ask questions (may be during the interview or at the end) – Phrase questions that will require a detailed response. Avoid questions that may lead to a Yes/No response. – Ensure CAM (not the support team) answers the questions. The CAM’s support team may provide additional/supporting detail when requested by the discussion lead. If the CAM’s answer is ill-defined or unclear, continue to probe with additional questions in the area of concern. – Use “Show me” statements versus “tell me” statements. Have the CAM show answers in his CAM Notebook 23
  • 24. CAM Discussion (Continued) • Conduct of the Discussion (Continued) – Use the questionnaire as a ‘guide’ to assist you through the discussion. Identify and prioritize your questions before the discussion. – At the end of the interview discuss any follow-up actions and potential CARs – Don’t make derogatory comments – Don’t Allow the discussion to turn into a technical problem resolution session • Remember the CAM and his team expended time and energy to prepare and host the discussion. Express thanks to the CAM and their team. 24
  • 25. Typical CAM Discussion Problems • Expectations not clearly defined • Little or no advance preparation • Key project personnel are new or not knowledgeable • “Yes/No” responses without suitable detail backup • Participants distracted or unfocused • Discussion not held in a conducive environment (too small to accommodate the team, not convenient for CAM to retrieve additional documentation, escort required or unavailable, etc) • Information / documentation not available for early review • Interruptions (phones, people, beepers) • “Strap-hangers” outnumber participants • CAM is not prepared / familiar with documentation • CAM’s support team answers all the questions • “Tells You” versus “Shows You” • “I am an engineer …not a bean counter” 25
  • 26. Summary • The IBR is an event, however the purpose and objectives should be viewed as a continuing process • The purpose of an IBR is to achieve a mutual understanding of the risks inherent on the PMB and the management control processes that will operate during execution • IBR preparation and planning are the key to a successful review • A PMB that is complete and documented at the appropriate level of detail is a key element for project management to successfully achieve project objectives • Anything that does not support the purpose should be moved outside the review • Evaluate the integrated PMB to determine whether it, captures the entire scope of work, is consistent with authorizing documents, and has adequate resources to meet schedule requirement and planned project tasks • Document findings and concerns for corrective action http://evm.nasa.gov 26