It describes the androgenic nature of prostate cancer and the androgenic axis should be tackled in all phases of prostate cancer. Also a special emphasis on recent data on management of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer.
Call Girls Raipur Just Call 9630942363 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Prostate cancer the androgenic fortified dogma
1. Prostate Cancer:
The Androgenic Dogma is still Fortified
Mohamed Abdulla M.D.
Prof. of Clinical Oncology
Cairo University
Asyut Cancer Center
Janssen Cilag Symposium
04/04/2018
2. Member of Advisory Board, Consultant, and Speaker for:
• Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Hoffman la Roche, Janssen Cilag,
Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Mundipharma, MSD, Ely Lilly
Speaker Disclosures:
3. Prostate Cancer:
The Story:
Dr. Huggins
(1941): Orchiectomy and DES
Effective Disease Control
Noble Price 1966.
Dr. Shcally et al:
(1977): LHRH Analogue
Effective disease
Noble Price
4. Prostate Cancer: Best Identity
Androgenic Disease
Androgen Deprivation
“Surgical or Medical”
Androgen Receptor
Blocking
Perfect Disease Control
5. Maintaining testosterone <32 ng/dL was associated with significantly longer
mean survival free of CRPC compared with levels >32 ng/dL
Survival free of CRPC in 73 patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer receiving ADT.
*Patients with three serum testosterone determinations <32 ng/dL; †Patients with breakthrough increases >32 ng/dL.
Serum testosterone was measured every 6 months.
ADT=androgen-deprivation therapy; CRPC=castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Figure adapted from Morote J, et al. J Urol 2007;178:1290–5.
100
80
60
40
20
0
CumulatesurvivalfreeofCRPC(%)
0 50 100 150 200 250
Follow up (months)
>32 ng/dL†
<32 ng/dL*
p=0.0258
6. Testosterone ≤30 ng/dL has been associated with longer overall
survival versus >30 ng/dL
Variable
Testosterone
Continuous
variable*
Testosterone
<50 ng/dL
(n=94)
Testosterone
≤30 ng/dL
(n=56)
Testosterone
<20 ng/dL
(n=25)
Time to progression
HR (95% CI)
p value
1.76 (0.62–5.01)
0.29
0.84 (0.52–1.37)
0.51
0.76 (0.46–1.26)
0.30
0.58 (0.30–1.15)
0.12
Overall survival
HR (95% CI)
p value
2.47 (0.70–8.75)
0.16
0.74 (0.42–1.33)
0.32
0.45 (0.22–0.94)
0.034
0.19 (0.04–0.76)
0.020
*Testosterone was considered a continuous (values were measured on a continuous scale) not categorical variable in this analysis.
CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio.
Bertaglia V, et al. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2013;11:325–30.
17. Prostate Cancer:
Positioning of Available Therapies:
Locoregional
Disease
Biochemical
Failure
Metastatic
“Sensitive”
Metastatic
“Refractory”
Death
TIME
TumorBurden
Androgen Deprivation Therapy
1st Generation
Anti-Androgen
2nd Generation
Anti-Androgen
Biosynthesis
Cytotoxic
Anti-microtubule
18. CRPC: Current Definition:
Castrate Serum
Testosterone = < 50 ng/dL
or 1.7 nmol/L
Biochemical progression: 3 consecutive
rises in PSA 1 wk apart, resulting in two
50% increases over the nadir, and PSA >2
ng/ml
Radiologic progression: The appearance
of new lesions: either two or more new
bone lesions on bone scan or a soft
tissue lesion
Symptomatic
or Subjective
Progression
19. Summary of The Clinical Trials Outcome
(The Monotherapy Approach)
Pharmaceutical Setting Control
POAS
+ in median
(months)
HR P value
Docetaxel/P 1st Line Mitox/P 2.9 0.79 .004
Cabazitaxel/P Post-D Mitox/P 2.4 0.70 <.0001
Abiraterone/P Post-D Placebo/P 4.6 0.74 <.0001
Abiraterone/P Chemonaive Placebo/P 5.2 0.81 .0033
Enzalutamide Post-D Placebo 4.8 0.63 <.001
Enzalutamide Chemonaive Placebo 2.2 0.71 <.0001
Radium Bone Mets.
Pre & Post-D
Placebo 3.6 0.70 <.001
1. Berthold DR, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(2):242-245. 2. de Bono JS, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9747):1147-1154. 3.
Fizazi K, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(10):983-992. 4. Rathkopf DE, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(Suppl 6): Abstract
5. 5. Scher HI, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(13):1187-1197. 6. Beer TM, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(Suppl 4):
Abstract LBA1. 7. Parker C, et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(3):213-223.
24. Loriot Y et al. Eur J Cancer 2015 sept ; 51(14):
1946-52
Study cohort consisted of 173 patients. Median duration of response to initial androgen
deprivation therapy (ADT) (time to castration resistance, TTCRPC) was 17.8 months.
Evaluation of AR axis targeted drugs for CRPC according to TTCRPC/12 mths.
PFS=7.5 mths
PFS=3.4 mths
27. Abiraterone Acetate: Better Insight:
• Abi 5β HSD D4A (Active Metabolite).
• D4A:
1. More potent inhibitor of CYP17A1.
2. Potent Inhibitor of 5@Reductase..
3. Potent inhibitor of AR (= Enzalutamide).
• Structural similarity to testosterone
Reduced by 5@ & β Reductase Agonist to
AR.
Li et al. Nature, 2015; 523(7560):347.
Nima Shariffi. ASCO GU 2016
28. Ueda et al. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer April 2017
29.
30. Addition of docetaxel to first-line long-term<br />hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): long-term survival, quality-adjusted survival and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Presented By Nicholas James at 2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium: Translating Evidence to Multidisciplinary Care
32. Docetaxel: Survival
Presented By Nicholas James at 2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium: Translating Evidence to Multidisciplinary Care
33. Docetaxel: Skeletal events (All patients)
Presented By Nicholas James at 2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium: Translating Evidence to Multidisciplinary Care
41. Prostate Cancer (C61): 1971-2011
Age-Standardised Ten-Year Net Survival, England and Wales
De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, et al. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:23-34
PSA Era
Early
Diagnosis
Therapeutics
Enhanced
M & CRPC
Survival
43. Still we need to know:
1. Which drug for which patient?
2. Which drug in subsequent lines?
3. Effect of initial natural history of disease on treatment
choice in CRPC phase?
4. Impact of drug resistance?
5. Impact of drug – drug interactions?
6. Impact of drug repositioning earlier in course of
mHSPC upon treatment selection for CRPC?
7. Impact of Molecular Key players in backstage of stage
on treatment selection for CRPC?
8. May be MORE QUESTIONS?
Although AA Offers Unmet Needs
in CRPC Patients with Better Insights,
but Definitely Still we are
in The Grey Zone in Management of CRPC