6. …and there are just as many definitions…
What Is Citizen Science? The Challenges of Definition, in ‘The Science of Citizen
Science’. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2
8. CITIZEN SCIENCE PROJECTS ACTIVELY INVOLVE CITIZENS
IN SCIENTIFIC ENDEAVOUR THAT GENERATES NEW
KNOWLEDGE OR UNDERSTANDING
1
8
Citizens may act as contributors, collaborators, or as project leader
and have a meaningful role in the project.
9. CITIZEN SCIENCE PROJECTS HAVE A GENUINE
SCIENCE OUTCOME
9
For example, answering a research question or informing
conservation action, management decisions or environmental
policy.
2
10. BOTH THE PROFESSIONAL SCIENTISTS AND THE
CITIZEN SCIENTISTS BENEFIT FROM TAKING PART
10
Benefits may include the publication of research outputs, learning
opportunities, personal enjoyment, social benefits, satisfaction
through contributing to scientific evidence e.g. to address local,
national and international issues, and through that, the potential to
influence policy
3
21. Citizen Science and Policy, in ‘The Science of Citizen Science’.
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2
22.
23. OPEN SCIENCE is defined as an inclusive construct that combines
various movements and practices aiming to
• make multilingual scientific knowledge openly available, accessible
and reusable for everyone,
• to increase scientific collaborations and sharing of information for
the benefits of science and society, and
• to open the processes of scientific knowledge creation, evaluation
and communication
• to societal actors beyond the traditional scientific community.
• It builds on the following key pillars: open scientific knowledge, open
science infrastructures, science communication, open engagement of
societal actors and open dialogue with other knowledge Systems
24. TheCitizen Sciencecontribution toOpen
Scienceshould bemaximised …
Comments on the first Draft of the
Recommendation on Open Science by the
Citizen Science and Open Science Community
of Practice
https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/comments_
osr_partner_csgp_document.pdf
31. The growth of Citizen Science is driven in part by the growth in connecting
technologies…
32. …and in the growth of commons-basedpeerproduction.
The history of commons-based peer production communities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commons-based_peer_production
33.
34. The growth inCS isseen bothin the academic literature
Kullenberg C, Kasperowski D (2016) What Is Citizen Science? – A Scientometric Meta-Analysis.
PLoS ONE 11(1): e0147152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
35. …andin the total number of CitizenScience projects.
No PhDs needed: how citizen science is transforming research.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07106-5
41. The impacts of CS are very wide-ranging
•Society
•Impact
•society and
individuals
•collective (societal)
values,
understanding,
actions and well-
being
•Environment
•Impact
the bio-chemical-
physical
environment,
the quality or
quantity of specific
natural resources or
ecosystems.
Science &
technology
Impact
•the scientific
process (method) as
well as research
more broadly
•the scientific system
(institutions; science
policy; incentive
structures),
•technological
artefacts (such as
apps) and standards.
•Governance
•Impact
processes and
institutions through
which decisions are
made (both informal
and formal)
Relationships and
partnerships
the governance of
data generated.
Wehn, U., Gharesifard, M., Ceccaroni, L. et al. Impact assessment of citizen science: state of the
art and guiding principles for a consolidated approach. Sustain Sci 16, 1683–1699 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00959-2
42.
43. Den Broeder et al. 2017
https://theoryandpractice.citizenscience
association.org/articles/10.5334/cstp.89
EverydomainofCS hasitsownuniqueareas ofimpact
47. Scalability. The first advantage of citizen science is
its scalability. In a prescient paper, Lahav et al.
(1995), discussing the then forthcoming Sloan Digital
Sky Survey, noted that ”Classifying very large data
sets is obviously beyond the capability of a single
person‚”. Distributing data to large numbers of
individuals and collecting classification results for any
given project could be a daunting management
challenge, and so automated processes were seen as
the most pragmatic solution….
By dramatically scaling up the number of people
available to work on a problem, citizen science eases
the problem of the data flood by alleviating the
reliance solely on automatic classifications, which
often do not yet perform as well as the human
techniques they were intended to replace
48. The Planet Hunters project originated in December
2010, participants look for transits in data from
NASA’s Kepler satellite. In May 2011, five months
after launch, Planet Hunters was still attracting
activity that amounts to the equivalent of 51 Full Time
Equivalent staff. Galaxy Zoo alone has recorded more
than 150 million classifications over nearly four years.
51. Serendipity. A second key advantage of human
classification is that it preserves the opportunity for
serendipitous discovery. Humans involved in a
classification task will continue to look for unusual
objects. Further, it has been seen that the interplay of
the science team and citizen scientists can be
multifaceted and can follow unexpected and quite
fruitful trajectories that might be quite different than
the original research goals.
52. Galaxy Zoo volunteer Hanny van
Arkel spotted an unusual, and
previously unknown, object, which
became known as Hanny’s
Voorwerp. This object was followed-
‐up by studies using several ground-
‐based observatories, the Swift
satellite, and with HST by the Hubble
Heritage Team. These studies indicate
that Hanny’s Voorwerp is a unique
example of a quasar light echo. A
vast, twisted filament of gas is
observed to be illuminated by the
powerful beam of a quasar that
existed in the center of IC 2497 until
recently, but is no longer active. The
HST campaign, in particular,
suggested that gas outflow from the
spiral galaxy IC 2497 is interacting
with a nearby part of the filament,
producing star formation.
53. Learning in Citizen Science, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_15
55. …and can make tangible contributions, such as to environmental policy….
Bio Innovation Service (2018) Citizen science for
environmental policy: development of an EU-wide inventory
and analysis of selected practices. Final report for the
European Commission, DG Environment under the contract
070203/2017/768879/ETU/ENV.A.3, in collaboration with
Fundacion Ibercivis and The Natural History Museum,
November 2018.
56. …and to the SDGs….
Fritz, S., See, L., Carlson, T. et al: Citizen science
and the United Nations Sustainable Development
Goals. Nat Sustain 2, 1063 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0426-8
95. The 10 Principles of Citizen Science
https://www.slideshare.net/MobileMaggie/ecsa-the-ecsa-principles-and-the-ecsa-
characteristics-of-citizen-science
97. Contours of citizen science: a vignette study –
will be published in Royal Society August 25th, currently
In pre-print here: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/6u2ky
The Characteristics of Citizen Science
98. TheCitizen Sciencecontribution toOpen
Scienceshould bemaximised …
Comments on the first Draft of the
Recommendation on Open Science by the
Citizen Science and Open Science Community
of Practice
https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/comments_
osr_partner_csgp_document.pdf
100. The Characteristics Areas
1. Core Concepts
2. Disciplinary Aspects
3. Leadership and Participation
4. Financial Aspects
5. Data & Knowledge
101. Core Concepts
Here, we look at the conceptual issues that might help to decide the
degree of citizen science of a given project. This can be especially
challenging in areas that were Identified as ambiguous, such as the
difference between a clinical study of digital health tools and participatory
sensing activities of the exact same tools.
• Science & Research
• What counts as research
• Intention and framing
• Hypothesis-driven, monitoring, inductive,
exploratory, and database creation
• Roles and responsibilities
• Subject or participant
• Ethics
102. Disciplinary Aspects
Our study of views demonstrated that some areas of research are
especially prone to ambiguity, or two specific issues that relate to
practices within the sub-disciplines in these areas. We therefore
explain what the specific issues are for each area.
• Disciplinary views – scientific and
technological, arts and humanities,
social sciences
• Medical sciences and human health
103. Leadership & Participation
Here we focus on who is the ‘project owner’: the body, group or
individual that has control over the project’s development. We
discuss the roles of participants and their engagement with the
project.
• Individual, community-led or research-led
• Organisations (RPOs, CSOs, public)
• Commercial activities
• Degree of engagement
• Small vs large scale
• Professionalism vs voluntarism
• Science engagement and education
• Links to decision making
104. Financial Aspects
Unlike other contributions that are happening in citizen science
(e.g. time, use of physical resources, use of knowledge and
expertise), financial transactions stand out as an area that can
lead to contention about the classification of a project.
• Financial support for scientific
research
• Payment to take part in a project.
• Incentives to participate in an activity.
105. Data & Knowledge
The final section looks at how data- and knowledge-generation
issues influence a given activity.
• Data and knowledge generation.
• Data ownership and use
• Data quality
• Local and lay knowledge-sharing and
application
• Opportunistic vs systematic data collection
• Digital data-collection tools
• Sharing personal and medical data