Advances in machine learning are responsible for ever-more automated campaign management from Google in the form of close variants, smart bidding, smart campaigns, similar audiences, etc. Do these automations really drive better results? How can PPC managers leverage this free technology to free up time to work on new things? And what are the best new things to focus on to drive exponential growth? Join Fred Vallaeys to learn more about free automation tools you can start using today to become a PPC rockstar.
4. A Tipping Point in Processing Power
2019
20031950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s
Moore’s Law:
Performance doubles roughly every 2 years
5. Machines don’t need us anymore
Machine learning can now learn without the
input of human experts
AlphaGo
Year 2016
Technique Studied 100,000 human
games
Time Months
Cost ~$250 million
Outcome Beat the world champion 4-1
AlphaGo Zero
2017
Played against itself 30
million times
Days
~$25 million
Beat AlphaGo 100-0
6. But we’ve seen this
before...
In 1997, world chess
champion Garry Kasparov
is defeated by Deep Blue,
IBM’s supercomputer...
7. “ ’’
— Garry Kasparov
AI Alone Is Not the Answer
A supercomputer like Deep
Blue was no match for a
strong human player using a
relatively weak laptop.
15. Your Automation Controls Google’s ML
Your automation could be as simple as an automated rule that
sends an email if some condition goes out of bounds
16. Tools to Create Your Own Automation
Solution Cost Benefits
Ad Scripts Low start-up cost
Ongoing maintenance cost
Great for prototyping
Quick to build something new
Can be used by tech-savvy marketers
API Higher start-up cost
Ongoing maintenance cost
Requires engineers
Scalable
Reliable
Full-featured
3rd Party Tool Ongoing license cost
No maintenance fees
Plug-and-play
Newest best practice are automatically
added
18. 2018
Close Variants:
Same meaning
for exact match
2017
Close Variants:
Word order and
function words
2010
Modified Broad
Match
2014
Close Variants:
Typos, Plurals,
Stemmings
Google Ads Match Types Timeline
19. Get the code: http://bit.ly/CloseVariants
Use Ads Scripts to Automate Monitoring
20. Automatically Remove Bad Close Variants
Could we enhance this reporting script so it
automatically adds negative keywords for bad
close variants?
● When the query underperforms the keyword
● When the query is too different from the keyword
21. Google Ads Scripts to the Rescue
1. Copy the code that someone else already shared
2. Make your own customizations
3. Put your new custom automation on auto pilot
Here’s the code to add a negative KW to an ad group:
>> adGroup.createNegativeKeyword(“a new broad negative keyword”);
22. Levenshtein Distance
A numerical score of how close the query
is to the keyword.
Add one point for every:
● letter that is changed
● letter that is deleted
● letter that is added
A bigger score means a bigger difference
PAJAMAS 0
PJAMAS +1
PJMAS +1
PJAS +1
PJS +1
= 4
Levenshtein Distance
How to Determine How Different a Close Variant is?
25. #SMX #14B @SiliconVallaeys
But I know I sell more lift
tickets when the powder
is fresh. Where’s the bid
adjustment for that???
But I know I sell more lift
tickets when the powder
is fresh. Where’s the bid
adjustment for that???
26. Automation Layering for Smart Bidding
Business data:
e.g. promotion schedule
Seasonality adjustment
tROAS target
Conversion rules
Smart Bidding
Use your business data to automatically change the dials of Smart Bidding
29. When I test RSA vs ETA, RSAs seem to
have worse conversion rate? Should I
delete them?
Maybe, but not definitely...
30. Google Says RSAs Have Access to New Ad Inventory
Where is this new inventory?
● On the SERPS
● For queries that had no
relevant ETAs
Why?
● Because Machine Learning
can create a relevant ad on
the fly
31. How to Check Your New Inventory
Methodology: http://bit.ly/rsa-inventory
Now you can see when:
1. Only an RSA serves (new inventory)
2. RSA competes with ETA (and may be worth removing)
32. Consider the bigger picture
Responsive Search Ad vs. Expanded Text Ad
● ETAs may win
● But RSAs are eligible for some additional inventory
Wrong Analysis: Is RSA or ETA better so I can keep only the winner
Correct Analysis: Do I get more conversions overall when I have RSA + ETA
“To reduce the likelihood of seeing higher cost-per-acquisitions couple
Responsive Search Ads with a Smart Bidding strategy like Target CPA” -Google
Teams of human plus machine dominated even the strongest computers... a chess-specific supercomputer like Deep Blue was no match for a strong human player using a relatively weak laptop.
So Max and his engineers rewrote the software to take a hybrid approach: the computer would flag the most suspicious transactions on a well-designed user interface, and human operators would make the final judgment as to their legitimacy. Thanks to this hybrid system—we named it “Igor,” after the Russian fraudster who bragged that we’d never be able to stop him—we turned our first quarterly profit in the first quarter of 2002 (as opposed to a quarterly loss of $29.3 million one year before).
So Max and his engineers rewrote the software to take a hybrid approach: the computer would flag the most suspicious transactions on a well-designed user interface, and human operators would make the final judgment as to their legitimacy. Thanks to this hybrid system—we named it “Igor,” after the Russian fraudster who bragged that we’d never be able to stop him—we turned our first quarterly profit in the first quarter of 2002 (as opposed to a quarterly loss of $29.3 million one year before).
Teams of human plus machine dominated even the strongest computers... a chess-specific supercomputer like Deep Blue was no match for a strong human player using a relatively weak laptop.
Since RSAs are adaptive to best match user search queries, they are eligible to serve for queries that your traditional ads would have not been eligible to serve on. These ads are still serving on the same results page, however, will serve on searches and in positions your ETAs would not.
Here's an example: Let's say your responsive search ad adapts and is relevant to a new query, but that query happens to be lower intent with a lower conversion rate. RSA will still be delivering relevant impressions where it wouldn't have been able to before however, the impact this specific interaction would have on your conversion rate could be negative. Naturally this is not a behavior we expect to see from the ad type, it is just a consequence of the ability to serve on a higher volume of relevant queries. The KPI we are measuring for success with this product is impressions, clicks and conversion volume - and we have seen RSAs execute pretty well against these.
One potential solution to reduce the likelihood of seeing higher cost-per-acquisitions would be coupling Responsive Search Ads with a Smart Bidding strategy like Target CPA. These products pair very well together,
as responsive search ads will make sure the message delivered is as relevant as possible and Target CPA would optimize that delivery to getting as many conversions as possible within your CPA.