Q4 Spotlight--Specialty Finance

Specialty Finance: Filling the Gap
MSF Enterprises, LLC
ABSTRACT
Inside Story:
Although the economy continues to recover from the recession (2007-2009), a number of
economic factors have been slow to improve and credit has remained largely restricted.
While prime interest rates have been pushed to historic lows, small-to-medium sized
INSIDE STORY:
businesses and consumers with poor credit have been unable to take advantage. Traditional
banks have tightened lending standards and have demonstrated a general unwillingness to
Introduction p.1
extend credit to higher risk consumers. Specialty finance firms, which provide access to
capital outside the traditional banking system, have been responsible for filling a portion of
Role of
the credit gap left behind by major banks. In this setting, specialty finance plays a critical
Specialty Finance p.2
role in the broader financial system by extending credit and stimulating growth through
consumers and businesses. Given the characteristics of the market, the specialty finance
Public Specialty
segment features a number of attractive investment opportunities and can provide high
Finance Companies p.4
yield potential in a low interest rate environment.
Enterprise

Consumer

Conclusion p.9

Expected 5 Yr Loan Rate Based on Credit Quality
25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%
U.S. Government U.S. Corporate U.S. Corporate Middle Market Prime Consumer Non-Prime Subprime
(Investment (Speculative Firm (Loan from (FICO > 680) Consumer (FICO Consumer (FICO
Grade) Grade) Specialty 620-679) < 619)
Lender)
December 2012
Denver ● New York *Highlighted categories reflect potential borrowers in the specialty finance space. Rates are approximated for
illustrative purposes.

MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2012

Q4 2012 Spotlight Specialty Finance: Filling the Gap 1

INTRODUCTION

Coming out of the recession (2007 – 2009), the U.S. economy entered a period of
consumer retrenchment and corporate deleveraging in which loose borrowing practices
that contributed to the formation of a credit bubble were temporarily abandoned. As of
Q3 2012, U.S. households were paying less than 16% of after-tax income to cover debt
payments and lease obligations, the lowest level since 19841. Meanwhile, the average
credit card balance declined over 24% since the second half of 2008 and the total
number of cards in circulation dropped over 20%2. Corporations have largely cleaned
up their balance sheets as well, with the S&P 500 approaching a record cash level of
$1.5 trillion3. Banks have similarly tightened up their books, with total loans
outstanding among the four largest lenders falling nearly 5% in the first quarter of 2012
from the same period two years earlier4.

Exhibit 1: Deleveraging in the U.S.

*Chart and data from Federal Reserve

The past few years have featured the beginning of a deleveraging process among businesses
and households. Many firms and individuals have become more willing to borrow recently,
yet are unable to access capital.

The process of widespread deleveraging presents a tremendous obstacle to economic
growth and has prompted the Fed to target lower interest rates and encourage borrowing
through various easing programs. While interest rates have dropped to all-time lows,
the outcome for the end-borrower has been mixed. Many qualified consumers and
businesses have been able to take advantage of low interest rates by refinancing current
obligations and floating longer-dated notes. Lower quality borrowers, however, are still
struggling to obtain financing as banks have yet to loosen credit standards despite a
significant increase in demand for auto loans, mortgages and other forms of credit5.
Although consumers and businesses remain cautious about ramping up spending due to
continued economic uncertainty, a number of likely borrowers are still largely excluded
from the capital markets. Regional banks have expanded their lending practices to pick
up some of this unmet demand, increasing total loan volume nearly 10% from Q1 2010
to Q1 20126. Still, there is a shortage of credit for consumers and companies

MSF Enterprises, LLC www.msfenterprises.com Copyright © 2012


perceived as “high risk.” The unwillingness of the traditional banking system to lend to
this demographic effectively limits growth potential, as the subprime and non-credit
categories account for more than 100 million U.S. consumers. A number of firms have
been successful providing financing to these “high risk” customers, with specialty
finance playing an important role in the current low-growth, credit-restricted
environment.

Exhibit 2
Bank Share of
Non-Investment Grade Lending
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%

*Data from Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

With banks increasingly unwilling to lend to high risk customers, specialty finance and the
shadow banking system have accepted the role of providing credit to smaller, non-investment
grade companies.

ROLE OF SPECIALTY FINANCE

Specialty finance can be broadly characterized as any financing activity that takes place
outside of the traditional capital provision services of the banking system. Typically,
specialty finance firms are thought of as being non-bank lenders that make loans to
consumers and small to medium-sized businesses (SMB’s) that cannot otherwise obtain
financing. For our purposes, we consider specialty finance as encapsulating a much
larger array of activities that basically includes any unconventional means of providing
or transferring capital. Without a consensus in the industry regarding the definition and
scope of specialty finance, this paper will seek to address the importance of the segment
and potential opportunities it may provide.

In order to determine the range of transactions included in the specialty finance segment,
we will first provide an examination of the typical firm operating in the space, including
its target market and potential sources of capital. Specialty finance activities are often a
component of the shadow banking system, as many of the firms that operate in the space
are non-bank lenders. Shadow banking is comprised of non-bank financial institutions
that act as credit intermediaries without exposure to the same regulation as their
commercial bank counterparts7. The firms are not burdened by restrictions on leverage,
yet cannot access central bank funding or government safety nets like deposit insurance



(until there is a financial crisis, of course). However, since traditional banks can also
package their offerings in unconventional ways, specialty finance cannot be strictly
classified as a form of shadow banking. Instead, we have loosely characterized specialty
finance firms as those willing to take greater risk to provide financial services to clients
that do not fit into a standard “credit box.”

Specialty finance firms generally offer services to unbanked or underbanked consumers, as
well as SMB’s that encounter cash-flow problems or may be experiencing a brief period of
declining performance. Unable to obtain financing from a bank, these customers are
forced to turn to specialty finance companies and are subject to above-average interest
rates. By charging a higher rate and using various forms of collateral as protection against
default, specialty finance firms are able to compensate for riskier credit profiles. Offering
higher-yield potential in a low-rate environment, specialty finance is an attractive business
model to a range of financial firms capable of underwriting the added risk. As a result, a
number of specialty lenders have been drawn into the space along with other firms
looking to enhance their returns, such as hedge funds and private equity groups.

Aside from an increase in the level of risk that specialty finance firms are willing to take
on, they further differ from banks in terms of the way they are capitalized. While banks
are primarily funded by customer deposits and Federal Funds, firms operating exclusively
in the specialty finance space must access the capital markets to obtain funding. Those
with strong credit ratings are able to take advantage of the commercial paper market, yet
this highly liquid segment tends to dry up during periods of instability, as observed during
2007-20098. Finance companies with favorable credit ratings will take on unsecured debt
if it is available, yet this type of borrowing often takes the form of secured debt when the
economic outlook turns negative. If the outlook is positive and investors have an appetite
for risk, specialty finance companies are able to raise funds through securitization.
Issuance of such asset-backed securities in 2012 is down considerably from pre-recession
levels, with $174.2 billion raised through October 2012 compared to $753.9 billion for the
full year 20069. At the same time, the market for these products may be showing signs of
improvement as 2012 issuance is up 65% over the prior year10. Regardless of the funding
method, specialty finance firms will face a much higher cost of capital than commercial
banks and must therefore seek out riskier transactions to achieve favorable net interest
margins.

There are a number of different types of specialty finance activities, which we have
arranged into two segments for this paper: enterprise specialty finance and consumer
specialty finance. We will examine these categories and provide an evaluation of the
market opportunities in each segment.

Bank’s closed folks… Check
out Specialty Finance as an
alternative source for your
capital needs



Exhibit 3: U.S. Publicly Traded Specialty Finance Companies
Firm Ticker Category Description P/E
Firm provides non-recourse pawn loans,
payday loans, installment loans, auto title
Consumer loans, debit cards and other fee-based credit
EZCORP,
EZPW Specialty services. The company also sells merchandise 7.0x
Inc. Finance and operates over 1,100 physical store
locations under the EZPAWN, Value Pawn
and EZMONEY brands.

Firm provides pawn lending, consumer loans,
check cashing, money orders, wire transfers,
Cash America Consumer
pre-paid debit cards and other credit services.
International, CSH Specialty
The company has over 1,000 physical
10.3x
Inc. Finance
locations and also operates through its Internet
lending activities.

Firm offers general purpose reloadable prepaid
debit cards and cash loading/transfer services.
Consumer The company markets its cards and services to
Green Dot
GDOT Specialty banked, underbanked and unbanked 9.9x
Corporation Finance consumers and offers its products through
retail distributors, mass merchandisers,
convenience stores and online.

Company operates as an automotive retailer
Consumer with 117 dealerships, primarily selling older
America's
CRMT Specialty model used vehicles and providing financing 11.2x
Car-Mart Inc. Finance for its customers under the Buy-Here-Pay-
Here (BHPH) business model.

Firm provides auto loans and related services
to consumers by purchasing consumer loans
Credit Consumer
from dealer-partners, often BHPH dealers, or
Acceptance CACC Specialty
by advancing money to dealer-partners in
11.5x
Corp. Finance
exchange for the right to service the
underlying consumer loans.

Firm operates as a Business Development
Company (BDC)** and offers senior debt,
Enterprise
American mezzanine debt and equity to fund growth,
ACAS Specialty 2.5x
Capital, Ltd. acquisitions, recapitalizations and
Finance
securitizations, investing $5MM-$800MM per
company.

Firm operates as a BDC, lending and investing
Enterprise
Full Circle primarily in senior secured loans, as well as
FULL Specialty 23.6x
Capital mezzanine loans and equity securities issues
Finance
by lower middle market companies.

*Firm descriptions from Yahoo! Finance
**Business Development Companies (BDC’s) are a form of publicly traded private equity that make investments
in small and middle market businesses. BDC’s are taxed as regulated investment companies with a pass-
through structure, distributing at least 90% of taxable income as dividends.



ENTERPRISE SPECIALTY FINANCE
Companies that have exhausted the traditional avenues for raising debt may turn to
specialty finance firms for funding through various loan structures and other exotic
instruments. Direct lending from hedge funds and private equity groups has become
increasingly popular for middle market companies that have been declined credit or are
unable to receive favorable loan terms from traditional banks. Faced with a shortage of
market-traded debt instruments that carry attractive yields, money managers have taken
an opportunistic approach to the credit crunch by providing debt facilities. Debt provided
by institutional investors typically carries an interest rate of around 9-12% that can
increase depending on the perceived risk of the borrower11. With such high yield
potential, several hedge funds and private equity firms have initiated new funds to focus
on direct lending strategies over the past few years12.
Middle market firms are often able to leverage assets on their balance sheet, such as
inventory or accounts receivable, as collateral to obtain short-term financing. Inventory-
based lending is a common practice among retailers, in which inventory is pledged as
collateral to secure a loan. The lender will conduct an appraisal of the inventory and lend
against the net orderly liquidation value in order to protect against downside risk13.
Accounts receivable can also be used as loan collateral, as invoice discounting enables a
firm to borrow against existing sales invoices. Alternatively, receivables can be sold
outright in a process called factoring, which allows the company to sell off the asset at a
discount. Due to the nature of the business and the way payments are structured,
receivables-based lending is a critical aspect of the healthcare industry. With U.S.
medical spending projected to reach 20% of GDP by 202114 and Obamacare expected to
further complicate payments in the industry, healthcare receivables should continue to
provide attractive investment opportunities in both the primary and securitization
markets. Along with other types of asset-based lending, these loans are important for
many companies because the lender’s risk is derived from the value of a particular asset,
and is not influenced by the overall financial strength of the company.
Royalty-backed notes have also emerged as a special structure enabling companies in
difficult borrowing positions to fund their operations. Bonds backed by intellectual
property rights first reached a mainstream audience in relation to the music industry. In
the late 1990’s, Bowie Bonds (also called Pullman Bonds, after the banker that negotiated
the deal) were introduced, backed by underlying cash flows tied to royalties on David
Bowie’s music catalog15. The structure has been revived in recent years within the capex-
intensive pharmaceuticals industry, as firms have looked to sell off future royalty streams
in order to obtain immediate cash flow to fund further research and development 16. With
the global pharmaceuticals market expected to reach $1.1 trillion by 201417 and further
product innovation required to meet the needs of an aging population, there should
continue to be royalty-backed investments available in the space. Since IP
securitizations have not been fully explored across industries, the area could provide
significant opportunities for firms deprived of capital and investors looking to take
advantage.



Exhibit 4: Royalty Bond Structure

The royalty bond structure typically benefits from multiple forms of downside protection,
including counterparty risk mitigation, over-collateralization and a flexible final maturity date.

Firms that wish to raise equity yet do not have the necessary scale to complete a public
offering through an investment bank are forced to either locate private investors or take an
alternative approach. Crowd funding has emerged as a way for relatively small
companies to circumvent the traditional equity raising process while bringing in the
needed capital to grow their business. The potential for start-ups and franchises to raise
equity through crowd funding is a recent development made possible with the passage of
the JOBS Act in April 2012, which eased a restriction on public solicitation from private
companies seeking to raise equity18. Since crowd funding is a relatively new form of
specialty finance, there are a number of potential risks that must be addressed in terms of
investor protection. The SEC has not yet determined the exact rules for crowd funding, so
it may take some time before the landscape for this type of investment can be fully
understood. Yet considering the overwhelming number of small businesses in need of
capital and the appeal of being an early-stage investor, there are likely to be substantial
opportunities in the future for crowd funding.

CONSUMER SPECIALTY FINANCE

Consumers that have either a poor FICO score or unestablished credit will have limited
choices when seeking financing. Specialty finance firms may extend credit to these
individuals, but usually in smaller amounts in order to mitigate risk. The buy-here-pay-
here (BHPH) model, commonly used by independent auto dealerships, can be an effective
method of providing financing to individuals with low FICO scores or limited credit
histories. When a consumer is unable to obtain financing from a bank, a store or
dealership may lend directly to the customer to fund the purchase, profiting from both the
sale and the financing process. Under this arrangement, a higher interest rate is charged
and a larger down payment is required to ensure some level of protection if the borrower
defaults and the automobile must be repossessed. The lender utilizes a number of
additional risk-reduction methods, such as requiring in-person payments and installing
GPS systems to expedite the process of collateral recovery19. In a low interest rate
environment, the high-yielding paper from BHPH transactions can provide attractive
investment opportunities even with an expected default rate of 30% factored in.



Loans that effectively force the borrower into making regular, timely payments also
provide an alternative form of financing for consumers that most banks would generally
prefer to avoid. Payday loans—short-term loans that must be repaid on the borrower’s
next pay date—are one of the more common forms of borrowing for low credit
consumers. The lender will typically verify employment, charge an above-average APR
and set up an electronic funds transfer agreement in an attempt to ensure repayment.
With such loans averaging 10-20% default rates20, payday lenders must have a number of
protections in place to assure profitability. Payroll deduction loans similarly rely on the
borrower’s employment status by enabling a worker to obtain a cash advance and then
amortize the loan with each check received. Since a portion of the borrower’s check is
automatically deducted for loan service, the lender is able to mitigate its risk as long as
the customer maintains employment. In a similar structure, on-bill financing ensures
repayment by combining loan payments with an existing obligation, such as a utility bill.
On-bill financing is most applicable with property improvements, in which the cost is
received as part of the bill from a utility company or other service provider. As a
delinquent payment would result in the customer being shut off from utility privileges,
the borrower’s incentive is increased and the lender’s risk is mitigated.

Collateralized non-recourse loans, in which the lender cannot pursue anything other than
the collateral pledged, provide another loan structure that incentivizes the borrower to
stay current on payments. Only the collateral can be collected in the event of default, so
the lender will typically target a low loan-to-value ratio and charge a higher interest
rate to offset risk. Low credit consumers are often eligible for this type of financing
through a pawn shop, in which personal property is used to secure a loan. If the customer
does not pay back the loan plus interest within a specified period of time, the pawn
broker takes ownership of the item and sells it at a mark-up to cover the loan amount.

Exhibit 5: Percentage of U.S. Households That Have Used Alternative Financial
Services (AFS)

*Chart and data from Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)



Aside from obtaining loans, unbanked and low credit consumers often require a range of
additional banking-type services that must be addressed through specialty finance. Since
some of these customers do not maintain checking accounts, they can encounter
difficulties when attempting to execute various types of financial transactions. For
example, consumers that do not qualify for a traditional credit card might utilize a prepaid
debit card as an alternative. Such prepaid cards enable the user to make purchases and
pay bills online, yet typically do not require any type of bank account. Although 88% of
consumers had a checking account in 2011, the amount has declined from the 2010 level
of 92%, primarily due to banks charging higher fees21. Consumers paid an average of
21% more to maintain checking accounts in 2011 than in 200622. With the increase in
bank fees, an estimated 13% of U.S. adults used a prepaid debit card in 2011, up from
11% in 201023. At the same time, the percentage of U.S. consumers carrying a credit
card fell 9% in 2011 over the previous year, while debit card penetration fell 15%24.
Prepaid cards enable financial institutions to access otherwise unreachable consumers,
and they are able to capitalize through a bevy of fees including activation, monthly
maintenance, balance verification and loading fees. Unbanked consumers also require
services for money transfers and remittances, which may be administered by commercial
banks or non-bank financial institutions. These services are heavily relied upon by the
customer and providers are able to take advantage, charging an average fee of 7.6% of the
transaction size for global cash remittances in 201125.

Changes in legislation intended to protect consumers from predatory lending could
present future issues for firms operating in the specialty finance space. These changes
require additional disclosure statements and provide strict limits on the maximum interest
rates that can be charged to consumers. Since the majority of consumer protection
legislation has been passed on a state-by-state basis, a high degree of uncertainty remains
over how restrictions may evolve in the future. In the event that regulation does increase,
firms with easy access to capital and highly scalable operations should be in the best
position to outperform competitors, along with firms that focus on states where regulation
is more relaxed. Increased regulation may result in traditional banks becoming more
risk averse, which would actually provide a boost to the specialty finance segment by
expanding the base of customers requiring unconventional loan services.



Exhibit 6: Banking Characteristics of U.S. Households

*Chart and data from Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

CONCLUSION

Low credit consumers and small-to-medium sized businesses continue to be underserved
by traditional banks. With approximately 60 million unbanked and underbanked
consumers in the U.S. spending a total of $78 billion on financial services each year26,
there are tremendous opportunities for specialty finance companies that cater to this
demographic. With employment slow to improve and the overall economic outlook
uncertain, it is unlikely that banks will return to pre-recession lending standards in the
near future. As a result, financial firms that are willing to take on additional risk to serve
non-traditional customers will continue to find opportunities with higher yield potential.
While specialty finance features a number of characteristics that we believe make it an
interesting space in the long term, it should at least continue to provide attractive
opportunities for the duration of the current low interest rate environment.

Michael Fields
Managing Partner
MSF Enterprises, LLC
717 17th St., Suite 2160
Denver, CO 80202
fieldsm@msfenterprises.com
303.847.4649



Disclaimer

This document is provided for informational purposes only, is subject to change and is not
binding. MSF Enterprises, LLC makes no guarantees regarding the information contained
herein and any statements represent the opinions of the firm. MSF Enterprises, LLC is not
responsible for any information stated to be obtained from third party sources. Any
companies, asset types or investment opportunities mentioned in the document are for
illustrative purposes only and are not intended as recommendations. MSF Enterprises,
LLC is not responsible for the use made of this document other than the purpose for which
it is intended, except to the extent this would be prohibited by law. Obtain independent
professional advice before investing.



Endnotes

1. Lee, Don. “U.S. families’ debt loads decline to pre-recession levels.” Los Angeles Times. 15 October 2012.
2. Ibid.
3. Cox, Jeff. “Companies Sitting on More Cash Than Ever.” CNBC. 23 October 2012.
4. Marcinek, Laura. “Biggest U.S. Banks Curb Loans as Regional Firms Fill Gap.” Bloomberg. 25 June 2012.
5. Zumbrun, Joshua. “Fed Sees Rising Demand for Auto and Mortgage Loans.” Bloomberg Businessweek. 31 October 2012.
6. Marcinek, Laura. “Biggest U.S. Banks Curb Loans as Regional Firms Fill Gap.” Bloomberg. 25 June 2012.
7. “The Deloitte Shadow Banking Index: Shedding Light on Banking’s Shadows.” Deloitte. 2012.
8. Kacperczyk, Marcin and Philipp Schnabl. “When Safe Proved Risky: Commercial Paper During the Financial Crisis of 2007-2009.”
Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 24: Issue 1. 2010.
9. “Issuance in U.S. Bond Markets.” SIFMA. 2012.
10. Ibid.
11. Chassany, Anne-Sylvaine and Jesse Westbrook. “Private Equity Enters Banks’ Turf in Europe.” Bloomberg. 8 February 2012.
12. Ahmed, Azam. “Bank Said No? Hedge Funds Fill a Void in Lending.” NY Times Dealbook. 8 June 2011.
13. Foley, C. Fritz; Raman, Ananth and Nathan C. Craig. “Inventory-Based Lending Industry Note.” Harvard Business School. 2012.
14. Wayne, Alex. “Health-Care Spending to Reach 20% of U.S. Economy by 2021.” Bloomberg Businessweek. 13 June 2012.
15. Richardson, Karen. “Bankers Hope for a Reprise of ‘Bowie Bonds.’” The Wall Street Journal. 23 August 2005.
16. Tempkin, Adam. “Bonds backed by drug-royalty cashflows make a return.” Reuters. 5 March 2012.
17. Jung, Jeff and John Tamisiea. “Not Your Parents’ Royalty Fund.” McDermott Will & Emery LLP. 12 October 2010.
18. Landler, Mark. “Obama Signs Bill to Promote Start-Up Investments.” The New York Times. 5 April 2012.
19. Bensinger, Ken. “A vicious cycle in the used-car business.” Los Angeles Times. 30 October 2011.
20. McArdle, Megan. “On Poverty, Interest Rates and Payday Loans.” The Atlantic. 18 November 2009.
21. Ody, Elizabeth. “Prepaid Card Use Up 18% as Consumers Drop Debit: Study.” Bloomberg. 11 April 2012.
22. Ibid.
23. Ibid.
24. Ibid.
25. “Remittance Prices Worldwide.” The World Bank. November 2011.
26. Morrison, David. “Financial Services to Unbanked Reflect Potentially Huge, Report Suggests.” Credit Union Times. 7 November
2012.

Bibliography

“2011 FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households.” Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. September 2012.
Ahmed, Azam. “Bank Said No? Hedge Funds Fill a Void in Lending.” NY Times Dealbook. 8 June 2011.
Bensinger, Ken. “A vicious cycle in the used-car business.” Los Angeles Times. 30 October 2011.
Chassany, Anne-Sylvaine and Jesse Westbrook. “Private Equity Enters Banks’ Turf in Europe.” Bloomberg. 8 February 2012.
“Company Profile.” Yahoo! Finance. 2012.
Cox, Jeff. “Companies Sitting on More Cash Than Ever.” CNBC. 23 October 2012.
Federal Reserve Economic Data. “Total Credit Market Debt Owed (TCMDO).” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 2012.
Foley, C. Fritz; Raman, Ananth and Nathan C. Craig. “Inventory-Based Lending Industry Note.” Harvard Business School. 2012.
“Issuance in U.S. Bond Markets.” SIFMA. 2012.
Jung, Jeff and John Tamisiea. “Not Your Parents’ Royalty Fund.” McDermott Will & Emery LLP. 12 October 2010.
Kacperczyk, Marcin and Philipp Schnabl. “When Safe Proved Risky: Commercial Paper During the Financial Crisis of 2007-2009.” Journal of
Economic Perspectives. Vol. 24: Issue 1. 2010.
Landler, Mark. “Obama Signs Bill to Promote Start-Up Investments.” The New York Times. 5 April 2012.
Lee, Don. “U.S. families’ debt loads decline to pre-recession levels.” Los Angeles Times. 15 October 2012.
Marcinek, Laura. “Biggest U.S. Banks Curb Loans as Regional Firms Fill Gap.” Bloomberg. 25 June 2012.
McArdle, Megan. “On Poverty, Interest Rates and Payday Loans.” The Atlantic. 18 November 2009.
Morrison, David. “Financial Services to Unbanked Reflect Potentially Huge, Report Suggests.” Credit Union Times. 7 November 2012.
Ody, Elizabeth. “Prepaid Card Use Up 18% as Consumers Drop Debit: Study.” Bloomberg. 11 April 2012.
“Remittance Prices Worldwide.” The World Bank. November 2011.
Richardson, Karen. “Bankers Hope for a Reprise of ‘Bowie Bonds.’” The Wall Street Journal. 23 August 2005.
Tempkin, Adam. “Bonds backed by drug-royalty cashflows make a return.” Reuters. 5 March 2012.
“The Deloitte Shadow Banking Index: Shedding Light on Banking’s Shadows.” Deloitte. 2012.
Wayne, Alex. “Health-Care Spending to Reach 20% of U.S. Economy by 2021.” Bloomberg Businessweek. 13 June 2012.
Zumbrun, Joshua. “Fed Sees Rising Demand for Auto and Mortgage Loans.” Bloomberg Businessweek. 31 October 2012.


Q4 Spotlight--Specialty Finance

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Ähnlich wie Q4 Spotlight--Specialty Finance

Ähnlich wie Q4 Spotlight--Specialty Finance (20)

Q4 Spotlight--Specialty Finance