This session will give researchers some tips on the first part of the paper including the introduction, literature review, research question & purpose of the study.
2. This session will give you as young researchers some tips on
the first part of the paper that is:
Introduction Research
questions
Literature review
Purpose of the
study.
3. The researcher formulates the research questions as
well as the objectives of the study.
A literature review is conducted to familiarise the
researcher with the content and the concepts related
to this study.
CONCEPTUAL PHASE
5. How do I start the Introduction?
What type of sentence should I begin with?
What type of information should be in my Introduction,
and in what order?
How do I end the Introduction?
6. The purpose of the Introduction is to stimulate the reader’s
interest and to provide pertinent background information necessary
to understand the rest of the paper.
You must summarize the problem to be addressed, give
background on the subject, discuss previous research on the topic,
and explain exactly what the paper will address, why, and how.
Besides motivating a reader to read your manuscript and to care
about your results.
the Introduction is useful also to the journal’s reviewers and
editors in judging the importance of your manuscript.
7. This section deals with five language areas :
TENSE PAIRS
SIGNALLING LANGUAGE
PASSIVE/ACTIVE USE
PARAGRAPHING
USEFUL LANGUAGE
Grammar and Writing Skills
8. Read the Introduction below.
Don’t worry if the subject matter is not familiar or if
you have difficulty understanding individual words,
especially technical terms like polylactide.
Just try to get a general understanding at this stage
and familiarise yourself with the type of language
used.
Let’s start by looking at a sample
9.
10.
11. There are a few tips that can help you write a strong
introduction, arousing interest and encouraging the reader to
read the rest of your work.
Keep it Short
Define the Problem
Move from general to specific: from the problem in the real
world to the literature to your research.
Write in the present tense except for what you did or found,
which should be in the past tense.
Organization
12. Literature review
My teacher says I have to write a
literature review, what do I do?
So basically I just read the articles and
summarize each one separately?
This sounds like a lot of information,
how can I keep it organized?
13. One way that seems particularly helpful in organizing literature
reviews is the synthesis matrix.
14. As you write your review, you will work horizontally in the
row belonging to each point discussed.
As you combine the information presented in each row, you
will begin to see each section of your paper taking shape.
Remember, some of the sources may not cover all of the main
ideas listed on the left, but that can be useful also.
The gaps on your chart could provide clues about the gaps in
the current state of knowledge on your topic.
How to use it?
15.
16. Here is an example from the literature review: “World War Two and its Effect on
Women.” This excerpt synthesizes information without summarizing.
While the articles used in this research agree that women made many advances during
the Word War II period, it is crucial to realize that not all these changes were
welcomed. In most cases women faced discrimination from just about everyone
around them. Women in the workplace were often placed in positions of inferiority or
treated as being less physically able to do the same work the men did. Many women
were often not trained because they were viewed as temporary employees who were
only there for the duration of the war (Bruley, 2003, pp.221-222). Women were very
rarely given equal pay as men, even though some of them did the same work. Women
in the military faced not only mental abuse but also physical harm from their male
counterparts. According to Cornelsen (2005), there were many instances where female
aviators were injured or killed due to being made to fly ill-maintained aircrafts or
aircrafts that had been sabotaged. (p.114)
17. After your chart is complete, notice patterns of information. You may
find that your sources, at times, discuss very similar material, or that
they sometimes deal with completely different aspects of your topic.
These patterns can be useful in creating a thesis statement that can
guide your writing and keep you focused as you begin your draft.
18. What is a Research Question?
How Do You Formulate A Good Research Question?
19. A research question guides and centers your research.
It should be clear and focused, as well as synthesize
multiple sources to present your unique argument.
Even if your instructor has given you a specific assignment,
the research question should ideally be something that you
are interested in or care about.
Be careful to avoid the “all-about” paper and questions that
can be answered in a few factual statements.
What is a Research Question?
20. Choose a general topic of interest, and conduct preliminary
research on this topic in current periodicals and journals to see
what research has already been done.
This will help determine what kinds of questions the topic
generates.
Once you have conducted preliminary research, consider: Who
is the audience? Is it an academic essay, or will it be read by a
more general public?
Once you have conducted preliminary research, start asking
open ended “How?” “What?” and Why?” questions.
Then evaluate possible responses to those questions.
How Do You Formulate A Good Research Question?
21. Why are social networking sites harmful?
A clearer question would be the following:
How are online users experiencing or addressing privacy
issues on such social networking sites as Facebook and
Twitter?
22. In essence, the research question that guides the sciences and
social sciences should do the following three things:
1) Post a problem.
2) Shape the problem into a testable hypothesis.
3) Report the results of the tested hypothesis.
23. What is the purposes of the study?
Why do I need to do it?
How do I write it?
24. A purpose statement is a declarative sentence which
summarizes the specific topic and goals of a document.
It is typically included in the introduction to give the
reader an accurate, concrete understanding what the
document will cover and what he/she can gain from
reading it.
What is the purposes of the study?
25. The purposes of the study should explain the final conclusions that
the research study hopes to reach.
Purposes should be written as statements.
When writing the Purposes section, it is best to start with the
general purpose of the study:
The overall purpose of this study is to examine the effect of telling
stories on nursery children's literacy skills.
The purposes of the study
26. Writing a statement of purpose will do 4 things to help you:
You will get more interested in your project.
It will keep you from getting overwhelmed and panicky at
all the information you may find.
It will help you develop a Thesis Statement, which comes
later on in the research process.
It saves you valuable time and effort.
Why do I need to do it?
27. Some common introductory phrases for purpose statements
include:
"The purpose of this paper/letter/document is to..."
"In this paper, I will describe/explain/review/etc. the..."
"My reason for writing is to..."
"This paper will discuss the..."
"The purpose of this paper is twofold: to ___ and ___"
28. This paper will describe four common causes of co-worker
conflict in organizations and explain how to use a five-step
procedure to constructively manage this conflict."
Critique:
Very specific about what aspects of conflict will be discussed.
Very precise about how much information will be given. Very
clear about what the reader will learn.
Example of an effective purpose statement:
29. Critique:
Very specific about what will be discussed (planning strategies),
and what the outcome will be for the reader (how to improve
employee productivity).
"This report will explain how supervisors can use four planning
strategies to improve employee productivity in the workplace."
Now its your turn
30. To be effective, a statement of purpose should be:
Specific and precise - not general, broad or obscure
Concise - one or two sentences
Clear - not vague, ambiguous or confusing
Goal-oriented - stated in terms of desired outcomes
31.
32. Rate your learning: In pairs write down the following in relation
to this sessions training
Two thing
you have
learnt from
this session
Two things
you would
like to know
about
Two things
you feel you
need to
improve
Set your self
two targets
that will help
you improve
Hinweis der Redaktion
The first thing you may notice about is that it is symmetrical. This is because many of the things you need to do in the Introduction are done — in reverse order — in the Discussion/Conclusion. For example, you need to write an opening sentence which enables you and your reader
to ‘get in’ or start your paper/thesis and you also need to ‘get out’ at the end of the Discussion/Conclusion by finding an acceptable way to end
the paper/thesis. In addition, you must look for a way to interface with the central report section at the end of the Introduction, and again — in
reverse — when you move out of the central section to start the Discussion/ Conclusion. Something else you should notice about the shape of the diagram
is that it narrows towards the central report section, and widens aft er it. Th is represents the way information is ordered in the Introduction and the
Discussion/Conclusion: in the Introduction you start out by being fairly general and gradually narrow your focus, whereas the opposite is true in the Discussion/Conclusion.
Look through the Introductions of your target articles.
Underline or highlight all the words and phrases that you think could be used in each of the four areas given in the previous slide
Why is paragraphing important?
Paragraphs are an important visual aid to effective reading and writing.
Two common errors in paragraphing are clusters of short or single sentence
paragraphs, and paragraphs that are too long. Both errors will
confuse readers and are signs of poorly-organised writing.
A long and rambling introduction will soon put people off and lose you marks. Stick closely to your outline for the paper, and structure your introduction in a similar way.
The entire introduction should logically end at the research question and thesis statement or hypothesis. The reader, by the end of the introduction, should know exactly what you are trying to achieve with the paper. In addition, your conclusion and discussion will refer back to the introduction, and this is easier if you have a clearly defined problem.
As you write the paper, you may find that it goes in a slightly different direction than planned. In this case, go with the flow, but make sure that you adjust the introduction accordingly. Some people work entirely from an outline and then write the introduction as the last part of the process.
Well, to begin, you have to know that when writing a literature review, the goal of the researcher is to determine the current state of knowledge about a particular topic by asking, “What do we know or not know about this issue?” In conducting this type of
research, it is imperative to examine several different sources to determine where the knowledge overlaps and where it falls short.
No, a literature review is not a summary. Rather than merely presenting a summary of each source, a literature review should be organized according to each subtopic discussed about the larger topic.
The sample above is an excellent example of how to synthesize information adequately. Notice how when transitioning from
Bruley to Cornelsen the writer notes not only that the two articles are similar, but also how they are similar. The writer goes into detail
about Bruley’s discussion of women in industry facing discrimination while noting that Stewart deals with prejudice in the military.
The author also transitions well between the Bruley article and the Cornelsen article; rather than summarizing, the author draws
comparisons between the two articles, giving relevant information and at the same time synthesizing the two works.
An evaluation of this question reveals that the question is unclear
it does not specify which social networking sites or state what harm is being caused.
Moreover, this question takes as a given that this
“harm” exists.
This version not only specifies the sites (Facebook and Twitter), but also the type of harm (privacy issues)
and who is harmed (online users).
Sometimes it is easier to start with the Research Questions and Hypotheses first and then write the Purposes, other times it is easier to start with the Purposes.