Myths and promises of blended learning
While lots of people write about blended learning, it isn’t always clear what is meant, or whether people are writing about the same thing. The purpose of this talk is to identify some assumptions and common assertions made about blended learning, so that these “myths” – claims that seem natural, because their historical and constructed status has been hidden rhetorically – can be explored and challenged. Such myths include the existence of purely online and purely face-to-face learning that can then be blended, ignoring the complex ways in which students learn; the idea that we should incorporate new technology because it is demanded by a new generation of students, ignoring the diversity of students’ experiences and evidence that technology use is not ‘generational’; and the claim that we can turn courses into learning communities through blended learning. Based on this critique, a more complicated picture emerges, highlighting the importance of learners’ purposes, choices and contexts. Throughout, I will argue that a body of work has developed that takes account of this messier, less controllable situation, and that we need to turn to this to as a basis for developing our thinking about blended learning.
- Keynote, 5th International Blended Learning Conference
- Note: sources, licensing information etc given in slide note. That means no re-using or editing of the image from World of Warcraft.
1. Myths and promises of blended learning Martin Oliver London Knowledge Lab Institute of Education
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30. The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
Hinweis der Redaktion
Barthes, R. (1957) Mythologies. (Trans. Lavers, A., 1972) London: Vintage. p1
Barthes, R. (1957) Mythologies. (Trans. Lavers, A., 1972) London: Vintage. p142
Friesen, N. (2008) Re-Thinking E-Learning Research: Foundations, Methods and Practices. New York: Peter Lang. p181
DfES (2003) Towards a Unified e-Learning Strategy. Bristol: HMSO. Available online: http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/consultations/downloadableDocs/towards%20a%20unified%20e-learning%20strategy.pdf
Oliver, M. & Conole, G. (2002) Supporting Structured Change: Toolkits for Design and Evaluation. In Macdonald, R. (Ed) Academic and Educational Development: Research, Evaluation and Changing Practice in Higher Education , 62-75. SEDA Research Series, London: Kogan Page. ISBN 0-7494-3533-X.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Frankenstein's_monster_(Boris_Karloff).jpg Public domain
Macdonald, J. (2008) Blended learning and online tutoring. Planning learner support and activity design. 2nd Ed. Aldershot: Gower
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Blended Learning Unit CETL bid; see http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/view/3803
Mark Brown; see http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/view/3803
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Maton, K., Krause, K-L., Bishop, A., Chang, R. & Churchward, A. (2007) The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. Proceedings of ASCILITE 2007. Available online: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/kennedy.pdf Bennett, S.; Maton, K.; Kervin, L. (2008). "The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence". British Journal of Educational Technology 39 (5): 775–786.
Holley, D & Oliver, M (2009) Student engagement and blended learning: portraits of risk. Computers in Education , 54 (3), 693-700.
Land, R. (2005) Embodiment and risk in cyberspace education. In Land, R. & Bayne, S. (Eds), Education in Cyberspace , 149-164. London: Routledge. P149, 154
Wenger, in Jones, C (2004) Nobody knows you're a dog: what amounts to context in networked learning? in Land, R. & Bayne, S., (eds) Education in Cyberspace, 105-116. London: Routledge. P106 Cf. Crook’s “learning nests”
Buckingham, D. (2006). Is there a digital generation? In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Digital generations (pp. 1-18). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. P1-2
Buckingham, D. (2006). Is there a digital generation? In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Digital generations (pp. 1-18). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p5
Pelletier, C. (2008) 'Producing difference in studying and making computer games: how students construct games as gendered in order to construct themselves as gendered' In Y. Kafai, C. Heeter, J. Denner and J. Sun (eds), Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: new perspectives on gender, games and computing. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
http://www.blackboard.com/Teaching-Learning/Overview.aspx http://www.blackboard.com/Solutions-by-Market/Overview.aspx URLs last accessed 2 nd June, 2010
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salmon, G. (2000) E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page. Salmon, G. and Giles, K. (1997) Training Virtual Management Teachers. European Journal of Open & Distance Learning. Available at: http://www.eurodl.org.
Draper, S. (2008) Learning and Community. Paper presented at the Learners in the Co-creation of Knowledge Conference, Edinburgh. http://lick2008.wikispaces.com/file/view/Strand+4+-+Steve+Draper+-+V1+Paper.pdf
Draper, S. (2008) Learning and Community. Paper presented at the Learners in the Co-creation of Knowledge Conference, Edinburgh. http://lick2008.wikispaces.com/file/view/Strand+4+-+Steve+Draper+-+V1+Paper.pdf