Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Ähnliche Bücher

Kostenlos mit einer 14-tägigen Testversion von Scribd

Alle anzeigen

Ähnliche Hörbücher

Kostenlos mit einer 14-tägigen Testversion von Scribd

Alle anzeigen

IPCRF presentation

  1. 1. IPCRF Preparation Mariches E. Begino SHT 1
  2. 2. What should be considered? Objectives should be SMART Specific Is the result achievable?  Can a supervisor verify the result? What would be the result look like?
  3. 3. Measurable Quantity  Quality Time Cost Effectiveness
  4. 4. Achievable Is the objective achievable in the available resource of time? Is the work within the individual control or view?  Is the objective appropriate to the individual experience skill and work level? Is it appropriate within a job description?
  5. 5. Relevant Employees Job Ratee’s Objective  Unit Objective Organization Objective
  6. 6. Time Bound Within an specific measure of time frame
  7. 7. Example: By ________/________/_________(When, Who? What? Include a number you can measure)will have ___________(How? Why? Remember to specify results using QET Criteria)
  8. 8. Remember: If QET is hard to be done, then there is a problem with the objective ( Not SMART) 3 objectives per KRA Turn generic into specific Presence of at least 2 measure per objective
  9. 9. QET: Quantity – Raw Numbers, Percentages Quality – e.g. Accuracy, Effectiveness Efficiency- (e.g., pesos/money saved, time saved) Timeliness- (e.g., within 3 months)
  10. 10. Remember: IPCRF is just like making LP Objective must start with the verb last is time If the focus is person, use number not % Do not shortcut
  11. 11. CCompetency
  12. 12. Lets Examine: (What is missing?)
  13. 13. Community Involvement  Objective  Prepared and submitted complete 160 DLL within the scheduled date of checking.  Quality 5- Prepared and submitted 160 DLL 4- Prepared and submitted 150-159 DLL 3- Prepared and submitted 130-149 DLL 2- Prepared and submitted 120-129 DLL 1- Prepared and submitted 119 DLL and below.  Efficiency  Timeliness 5- Submitted DLL on scheduled time. 4- Submitted DLL One (1) day late from scheduled checking. 3- Submitted DLL Two (2) days late from scheduled checking. 2- Submitted DLL Three (3) days late from scheduled checking 1- Submitted DLL Four (4) and more days late from scheduled checkin.g
  14. 14. Community Involvement  Objective  Conducted six (6) general /parents assembly meeting with 75% parents attendance within the scheduled date.  Quality 5-conducted 6 GA meetings 4-conducted 5 GA meetings 3- conducted 4 GA meetings 2-conducted 3 GA meetings 1- conducted 1 or 2 GA meetings  Efficiency 5- conducted meetings /assemblies with 75% parents attendance. 4- with 70% to 74.99 % parents attendance. 3- with 65 % to 69.99 % parents attendance. 2- with 60 % to 64.99 % parents attendance. 1- with 5 0 % and below parents attendance.  Timeliness 5-Conducted Meetings on scheduled time. 4- Conducted meeting One (1) day late from the schedule date. 3-Conducted meeting Two (2) days late from the schedule date. 2- Conducted meeting Three (3) days late from the schedule date. 1- Conducted meeting Four (4) and more days late from schedule date.
  15. 15. SDO Cam. Norte Non Negotiables  Teaching Learning (40%)  DLL Preparation (20%)  Competencies (10%)  Pupils’ Outcome (30%)  NAT Target (10%)  Drop out Rate (10%)  Community Involvement (15%)  6 Gen. Assembly meeting (5%)  Community Involvement (15%) Plus Factor used for IPCRF can not be used in promotion

×