1. IPCRF
Preparation
Mariches E. Begino
SHT 1

7. What should be considered?
Objectives should be SMART
Specific
Is the result achievable?
 Can a supervisor verify the result?
What would be the result look like?

8. Measurable
Quantity
 Quality
Time
Cost Effectiveness

9. Achievable
Is the objective achievable in the
available resource of time?
Is the work within the individual
control or view?
 Is the objective appropriate to the
individual experience skill and work
level?
Is it appropriate within a job
description?

10. Relevant
Employees Job
Ratee’s Objective
 Unit Objective
Organization Objective

11. Time Bound
Within an specific measure of time
frame

12. Example:
By ________/________/_________(When,
Who? What? Include a number you can
measure)will have ___________(How? Why?
Remember to specify results using QET
Criteria)

13. Remember:
If QET is hard to be done, then there is a
problem with the objective ( Not SMART)
3 objectives per KRA
Turn generic into specific
Presence of at least 2 measure per objective

14. QET:
Quantity – Raw Numbers, Percentages
Quality – e.g. Accuracy, Effectiveness
Efficiency- (e.g., pesos/money saved, time saved)
Timeliness- (e.g., within 3 months)

16. Remember:
IPCRF is just like making LP
Objective must start with the verb last is time
If the focus is person, use number not %
Do not shortcut

17. CCompetency

18. Lets Examine:
(What is missing?)

19. Community Involvement
 Objective
 Prepared
and
submitted
complete
160 DLL
within the
scheduled
date of
checking.
 Quality
5- Prepared and
submitted 160 DLL
4- Prepared and
submitted 150-159
DLL
3- Prepared and
submitted 130-149
DLL
2- Prepared and
submitted 120-129
DLL
1- Prepared and
submitted 119 DLL
and below.
 Efficiency  Timeliness
5- Submitted DLL on
scheduled time.
4- Submitted DLL One
(1) day late from
scheduled checking.
3- Submitted DLL Two
(2) days late from
scheduled checking.
2- Submitted DLL
Three (3) days late
from scheduled
checking
1- Submitted DLL Four
(4) and more days late
from scheduled
checkin.g

20. Community Involvement
 Objective
 Conducted
six (6)
general
/parents
assembly
meeting with
75% parents
attendance
within the
scheduled
date.
 Quality
5-conducted
6 GA meetings
4-conducted
5 GA meetings
3- conducted
4 GA meetings
2-conducted
3 GA meetings
1- conducted
1 or 2 GA
meetings
 Efficiency
5- conducted meetings
/assemblies with 75%
parents attendance.
4- with 70% to 74.99
% parents attendance.
3- with 65 % to 69.99
% parents attendance.
2- with 60 % to 64.99
% parents attendance.
1- with 5 0 % and
below parents
attendance.
 Timeliness
5-Conducted Meetings
on scheduled time.
4- Conducted meeting
One (1) day late from
the schedule date.
3-Conducted meeting
Two (2) days late from
the schedule date.
2- Conducted meeting
Three (3) days late
from the schedule
date.
1- Conducted meeting
Four (4) and more
days late from
schedule date.

21. SDO Cam. Norte
Non Negotiables
 Teaching Learning (40%)
 DLL Preparation (20%)
 Competencies (10%)
 Pupils’ Outcome (30%)
 NAT Target (10%)
 Drop out Rate (10%)
 Community Involvement (15%)
 6 Gen. Assembly meeting (5%)
 Community Involvement (15%)
Plus Factor used for IPCRF can not be used
in promotion