Presentation by Julie Girling MEP (South West & Gibraltar) to the Environment Conference 2017 which took place on Friday 17th March at the Royal Agricultural University, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, UK.
Group_5_US-China Trade War to understand the trade
Environment conference presentation by Julie Girling, MEP
1. Environment Conference
“What next for the Countryside Post Brexit”?
Hosted By Julie Girling,
MEP for the South West & Gibraltar
www.juliegirling.com @juliegirling #envifuture
3. Julie Girling MEP
What has the EU ever done for us?
An overview of EU Environmental Legislation
and Finances
www.juliegirling.com @juliegirling #envifuture
4. Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)
Introduced in 1962
• Strong culture of state intervention in founding member states
• 70% of total EU spending budget (now reduced to 40%)
• Subsidies led to over production
• No environmental element
5. CAP Reforms
• 1972 implementation of Mansholt Reform
• 1980s Dairy Quotas, budget ceilings established
• 1990s McSharry Reforms including set aside, retirement support, reduced
coupled support, increased complexity and administrative burden
6. 21st Century Reforms
• Harmonised payments for arable crops
• Increased coupling for livestock
• 2 pillar approach
• Agri-environmental schemes now compulsory in member states
• NO budget or financial reforms
7. 2003 Fischler Reforms
• Decoupling principle agreed
• Single payment scheme introduced (England 2003)
• Cross Compliance for food safety, environment and animal welfare introduced
Ciolos Reforms
• Move towards stronger environmental element – Greening
• Public money for public goods
• Reduced price intervention
• Active farmer principle
8. CAP 2017
4 Basic Regulations
• Direct Payments
• Rural Development
• CAP financing
• Single CMO/market measures
Greening
• 30% of direct payments must go to provide crop diversification, EFAs etc
• GAEC
9. CAP Conclusions
• Expensive – still 39% of total EU budget €59billion
• Unwieldy – one common system from the Algarve to the Arctic
• Unfair – no re-calibration of total budget
• ENVIRONMENT – not delivering maximum benefits
• Currently delivers circa €3.5billion direct from central fund to the
countryside
10. Where CAP Finances Go:
CAP - Spending Areas
Billions Euros – 2014 Source: EU Commission
Rural Development Fisheries Environment Direct Aid
Direct Aid:
40.58Bn
Rural Development:
11.19Bn
Fisheries:
0.76Bn
Environment:
0.27Bn
11. Who Pays for CAP?
CAP - Major Contributors
Billion Euros – 2014 Source: EU Commission
UK Poland Netherlands Germany France Italy
UK: 3.9Bn
Poland: 5Bn
Netherlands: 0.9Bn
Germany: 6.1Bn
France: 8.5Bn
Italy: 5.5Bn
12. Environmental Legislation
• 650 Legal Acts
• Administered by DEFRA
• Enforced via the European Court of Justice
• Post Brexit – the administrator becomes the ultimate enforcer
• New access to justice may be required
13. ECHA / EFSA
• REACH regulation
• PPP (pesticides) regulation
• Biocides regulation
• CLP regulation
Impact on water, ecosystems and non target organisms
14. Nature Protection / Biodiversity
• Birds Directive
• Habitats Directive
Objectives:
1. To maintain populations at favourable conservation levels
2. Contribute to biodiversity through habitat conservation
3. Protect natural species of flora and fauna
15. Invasive Alien Species
• Provides for cross-border action and co-operation to tackle IAS
• Early alert system
• Regulates trade practices
16. Water Quality
• Water Framework Directive
• Priority substances
• Nitrates Directive
• Urban Waste Water Directive
• Drinking Water Directive
• Bathing Water Directive
• Flood Directive
17. LIFE
The only funding instrument directed exclusively at achieving the objectives of
the environmental acquis
• Since 1992 the UK has received 6.2% of all funding - €241.5m
• UK is currently spending the largest ever conservation grant - €12m
18. Environmental Impacts
Environmental Impact Assessment
• Requires “assessment of the environmental effects of those public and
private projects which are likely to have significant effects on the
environment”
• Systematic collection and analysis of information
Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive
• Assessment of a wide range of public plans
19. Climate Change
UK negotiates with UNFCCC as part of the EU. Uks Kyoto and Paris obligations
are delivered jointly. Contribution to the Treasury from ETS is £500m pa
• EU ETS
• NU non ETS
• LULUCF
• Effort sharing
20. Climate Change
Climate change obligations remain. Non EU ETS increases in importance.
• Agriculture and the countryside
• Forestry
• Land use change
• Waste
• Energy efficiency – buildings, processes etc.
UK target +16% carbon savings
21. Air Quality
• National Emissions Ceilings Directive
• Ambient Air Quality Directive
• Medium Combustion Plants
• Large Combustion Plants
• Industrial Emissions Directive
Objectives:
• To reduce pollution including PM NOX and NH3
• To tackle eutrophication and acid deposition
22. Research and innovation
The UK is one of the largest recipients of research funding in the EU.
• Between 2007 – 2013 the UK received the fourth largest share of research
and innovation funding with €8.8 billion out of a total of €107 billion
• Re funding awarded on a competitive basis, the UK was the second largest
recipient after Germany, with €6.9 billion out of a total of €55.4 billion.
• At the start of 2017 UK was the top recipient of EU innovation funding
23. Other Issues
• Organic Farming
• Plant Health
• Seeds Regulation
• Animal Welfare
• Animal Health
• GMOs
• Availability of labour / immigration
24. Questions Post Brexit
• Jurisdiction for enforcement
• Budgets – with the Treasury come up with the cash?
• Replication of agencies including RPA
• International competitiveness of farming
• Government commitment to the environment
• Trans boundary nature of policy
• Unknown future trading relationships
• TFEU require full compliance ……… will this continue?
• How will we track EU legislative changes in the future?
• Disentanglement of joint international targets / conventions
25. Environment Conference
“What next for the Countryside Post Brexit”?
Hosted By Julie Girling,
MEP for the South West & Gibraltar
www.juliegirling.com @juliegirling #envifuture
26. Martin Lane
Director, Cotswolds AONB
The value of EU Environment Legislation in Protected
Landscapes and future Opportunities
27. The Value of EU Environmental
Legislation in Protected Landscapes
and future Opportunities
28. Protected Landscapes
• In England & Wales
• 13 National Parks, 38 AONBs, & 43 Heritage Coasts
• In the South West
• 2 National Parks, 13 AONBs, & 20 Heritage Coasts
• 25% of the country designated as AONB or National Park, a truly national set of
assets
• Our iconic high quality landscapes are home to high quality habitats and their
associated species
• Internationally recognised by IUCN, World Conservation Union
30. Value of Protected Landscapes
• Protected Landscapes in England & Wales
• worth £20 billion to the economy
• home to 85,000 businesses
• receive 260 million visits a year, worth over £6 billion a year
• Cotswolds AONB
• £2 billion GVA of economic activity
• home to 9,500 businesses
• Economic contribution of Cotswolds AONB
• £337 million GVA of economic activity
• 9,720 jobs critically dependent upon landscape quality
• attracts 23 million day visits a year, worth £1 billion
32. Habitats Directive
• 1992 - to maintain or restore natural habitats and wild species
• led to Special Areas of Conservation, SACs
• led to favourable condition assessments of SSSIs & NNRs
• driven improved management of SSSIs , NNRs and SACs
• In the Cotswolds
• 5 SACs, 3 NNRs and 89 SSSIs
• Ancient semi natural woodlands and flower rich grasslands are both special qualities of
the Cotswolds AONB landscape
33. Birds Directive
• 1979 - to maintain wild bird populations and protect vulnerable birds
• Oldest piece of EU environmental legislation
• led to Special Protection Areas, SPAs
• The associated habitats are often a special quality of the Protected Landscape
• East Devon heathland SPA, East Devon AONB and Tamar estuary SPA, Tamar Valley AONB
34. Water Framework Directive
• 2000 - a framework for the protection of inland rivers and lakes, estuaries, coastal
waters and groundwater
• river basin districts and river basin management plans
• reduced pollution of watercourses
• improved management of sewage entering the sea and cleaner beaches
• nitrate vulnerable zones
• catchment sensitive farming
35. SEA Directive & Habitats Regulations
• Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive, SEA, 2001
• Seeks to integrate environmental considerations into the preparation and adoption of
plans and programmes with a view to promoting sustainable development
• Habitat Regulations
• Requires the assessment of certain plans or projects which affect Natura 2000 sites
• Required of National Park and AONB plans – even if these are environment based
plans
• Safeguards the special qualities of Protected Landscapes
36. EIA Directive
• Environmental Impact Assessment Directive EIA, 1985
• seeks to ensure that a local planning authority when deciding whether to grant planning
permission for a project, which is likely to have significant effects on the environment,
does so in the full knowledge of the likely significant effects, and takes this into account in
the decision making process.
• Forestry, woodland creation, change of land use
• Increasing productivity of uncultivated land
• Water management, irrigation, land drainage, flood defence
• Safeguards the special qualities of Protected Landscapes
37. CAP
• Basic payment scheme
• Incorporates cross compliance
• Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions
• Boundaries, Public Rights of Way, SSSIs, Ancient Monuments
• Statutory Management Requirements
• Habitats Directive, Birds Directive, Animal Health & Welfare
• Rural development programme
• Agri environment
• Countryside Stewardship, Environmental Stewardship
• Protected Landscapes have been a target for investment
• LEADER
• Countryside productivity
• Growth programme
41. Natura 2000
• Natura 2000 sites (SACs and SPAs) aimed for
• identification and designation of sites
• improved management
• favourable condition of sites
• 2010 targets missed across the EU, led to revised targets for 2020 and additional
finances being made available
• Mainland Europe often talks of “paper parks”, a designation, but little or no
management
• Numbers of designations and land area has increased, but overall habitats and
species remain in decline
42. EU & Europe
• EU the institution v Europe the place
• Landscape, biodiversity, migrating species, plant pests and diseases don’t respect
administrative boundaries
• Brexit = leaving the EU, not Europe
• What was life like before the EU Directives ?
• In 1973 as the UK joined the EU it was described as the “Dirty Man of Europe”
• Only country in western Europe who had failed to control pollution from cars and power
stations, it was undermining pesticide control and ignoring bathing water standards
43. EU Benefits
• Have our Protected Landscapes benefitted ?
• Has the wider environment benefitted ?
• EU Legislation and Directives
• cleaned up the environment
• provided stronger protection for the environment
• raised standards
• Investment: CAP, LIFE, LEADER
• EU Directives + their enshrinement in UK law compare well with the duties on public
bodies to have regard to the purposes of National Park and AONB designation
• Section 62 of the Environment Act 1995
• Section 85 of the Countryside & Rights of Way Act 2000
44. Directives & Conventions
• EU Directives enshrined in our Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981, Conservation
Regulations 1994, Town & Country Planning Regulations 2011
• Brexit could lead to a great Repeal Bill
• After the UK exits the EU it remains a signatory to;
• Ramsar Convention 1971, conservation of wetlands
• Bonn Convention 1979, forerunner to Birds Directive
• Bern Convention 1982, forerunner to Habitats Directive
• European Landscape Convention 2004, (Council of Europe)
45. Simplify the system
• Can we simplify the system ?
• Bring strands from multiple regulations together into a single issue or topic specific
regulation
• Merge the Water Framework Directive Groundwater Directive, and Nitrates Directive into
one single regulation removing duplication without diminishing their impact
46. Reduce the overlap
• Can we reduce the overlaps ?
• SSSI + Ramsar site + SPA + Heritage Coast + AONB (Isles of Scilly)
• NNR + SSSI + SAC + National Park (Dartmoor)
• AONB + National Park (North Norfolk Coast & The Broads)
• Do we need two national landscape designations ?
• New approaches, Natural Capital Committee ?
• Would the general public better understand, appreciate, value and support a simpler
system ?
47. A local menu
• A menu for each Protected Landscape
• Management Plan, Landscape Assessment, Strategy & Guidelines
• Locally tailored, informed, owned and evidenced approach
• Local rates to reflect local costs
• Local advice and local delivery
• Outcomes based, payment by results
• A combined environmental and socio economic menu
• Agri environment + Countryside Productivity + LEADER
48. Environment Conference
“What next for the Countryside Post Brexit”?
Hosted By Julie Girling,
MEP for the South West & Gibraltar
www.juliegirling.com @juliegirling #envifuture
52. Government’s standard definition
Areas that fall outside of settlements with more than 10,000 resident
population
10 categories on a scale between “major conurbation” and “hamlets
and isolated dwellings”
Frequently aggregated to predominantly rural, urban with significant
rural and predominantly urban
On the other hand – we all know it when we see it!
57. Rural business
Rural businesses are those that operate and trade in defined rural
areas - both land-based and non land based businesses
541,000 registered businesses in rural areas - 25% of all registered
businesses in England
90,000 (16%) of these are land based - on agriculture, forestry and
fishing
58. Gross value added
England Rural GVA (2016)
– Predominantly rural: £229 billion (16%)
– Urban with significant rural: £152 billion (12%)
GVA per workforce job is a measure of productivity
UK productivity is currently 20% below the G7 average
Rural productivity is 17% lower than urban productivity (7% ex
London)
Gross value added (GVA) is a measure of the value of goods and
services produced in an area, industry or sector of an economy. In
national accounts GVA is output minus intermediate consumption.
60. UK agri-food sector GVA (2013)
The agri-food sector contributed £103.0 billion or 7.6% to national
GVA in 2013 employing 3.8 million people of which 430,000 were in
agriculture and fishing
61. England tourism sector GVA (2010)
The England tourism sector contributed £67.6 billion
£10.7bn in predominantly rural areas
Predominantly
Urban inc
London
£50.1bn (74%)
Predominantly
Rural
£10.7bn (16%)
Significantly
Rural
£6.8bn (10%)
62. The characteristics of rural businesses
Typically micro or small businesses
96% are family owned - 89% of agricultural businesses
60% have been in the family for over 50 years
78% unincorporated
Asset rich and cash poor
Low debt/equity ratios
But they invest for the long term
Significant contributors to the national economy
But lower productivity than urban businesses
Potential for growth
70. Inhibitors of growth in the rural economy
Low financial returns and market failure – particularly in the core
land based activity
Low recognition of the value of public goods
Over regulation
Restrictive and costly planning system
Inadequate digital connectivity – broadband and mobile
Bureaucracy associated with public funding options
Labour supply and access to skills
Low confidence in the taxation system
Absence of long term governmental strategies for the rural economy
Poor productivity
72. Reinvesting the UK's EU membership fee
In 2015 the UK government paid £13 billion to the EU budget
EU spending on the UK was £4.5 billion
So the UK’s ‘net contribution’ was estimated at about £8.5 billion
Current EU spending on agriculture and rural development is £3.2 billion
73. Helping government to invest for growth
Increasing productivity and delivering improved environmental
outcomes through a new, long term, world leading food, farming and
environment policy – which works for the UK
Creating markets for public goods that reflect value and not profit
foregone
Retaining markets in the EU whilst discovering new markets further
afield – on terms that strengthen our industry
Removing regulation and bureaucracy that unnecessarily inhibit
growth
Ensuring an adequately skilled workforce from home and abroad
Connecting the rural economy to national and global markets
74. Shared visions and principles for a new policy
Objectives set out by both CLA and Defra seem to agree on a vision of a policy that:
Secures a more market oriented, productive, competitive and resilient farming and
forestry sector
Recognises the value of public goods
Enhances the environment
Delivers food security
Has a dedicated UK budget
Delivers value for money
75. Creating markets in public goods
Recognising and rewarding land managers for eco-system services
such as:
Uplands management
Creation and management of habitats, woodland and meadows
Carbon storage
Water and flood management
Bio-diversity
Contracts between the state and land manager based on agreed
environmental outcomes
Creating new markets for private investment in natural capital
services and bio-diversity offsetting
76. Trade
Outcome of EU trade negotiation will determine scale and nature of
required policy intervention
Most outcomes will present opportunities
Grow existing markets at home and abroad
Bilateral trade deals to open new markets across the world
Trade agreements come with compliance strings and regulatory
standards
Level playing fields or consumer choices?
Animal welfare – a trade advantage?
Quality standards and labelling
77. Regulation
Take immediate opportunities to remove obvious burdens
Provide certainty for businesses by ensuring all laws transfer into domestic law
Review and repeal to reduce regulatory burdens
Remove the gold plating
Develop new, world leading approaches to achieving regulatory outcomes
Ensure a regulatory framework that works for and is relevant to the UK
78. Labour market, skills and innovation
Establish appropriate sector specific schemes that ensure availability of seasonal,
permanent and skilled labour
Invest in skills
Invest in research and innovation – and in the adoption of the outcomes.
79. Conclusion
The rural economy is diverse and rural businesses take many forms
and operate across many sectors
Rural businesses contribute £229 billion each year to the English
economy, representing 16% of total GVA but productivity lags the
rest of the economy
Rural business matters
The CLA and Government recognise, and largely agree, what the
obstacles to growth in the rural economy are
Brexit presents huge challenges – but also opportunities to reshape
the rural economy
Our success is vital to the success of Brexit – and we need to make
sure government doesn’t forget it.
80. 16 Belgrave Square
London SW1X 8PQ
Tel 020 7235 0511
Fax 020 7235 4696
Email mail@cla.org.uk
Website www.cla.org.uk
THANK YOU
81. Environment Conference
“What next for the Countryside Post Brexit”?
Hosted By Julie Girling,
MEP for the South West & Gibraltar
www.juliegirling.com @juliegirling #envifuture
114. Environment Conference
“What next for the Countryside Post Brexit”?
Hosted By Julie Girling,
MEP for the South West & Gibraltar
www.juliegirling.com @juliegirling #envifuture
115. Nick von Westenholz
NFU Director of EU Exit & International Trade
Brexit – Opportunities & Threats
116. Brexit – Opportunities & Threats
Nick von Westenholz
Director, EU Exit & International Trade
118. THE PROCESS
• No negotiation without notification: EU (Notification of
Withdrawal) Bill now enacted.
• Article 50 triggered by end of March 2017 – EC then adopts
negotiating “guidelines”
• Two year process – can be extended by unanimous agreement
– to negotiate “withdrawal agreement.”
• Question over agreement on “future relationship”
• Dutch elections March 2017, French elections April/May
2017, German elections Autumn 2017.
• UK Parliamentary (and EU Parl) approval required
• Great Repeal Bill & other legislation
121. THE POLICY
Leave the single market, while seeking
the greatest possible access
Out of the Customs Union, but looking
for a customs agreement
Britain could pay if necessary
A final deal put to a vote of both Houses
of Parliament
Guarantee the rights of EU nationals in
Britain, and Britons living in Europe
ASAP
A phased process of implementation
No deal' better than a 'bad deal'
THE PM’s PLAN
122. NFU’s Policy Priorities
Profitable, Competitive, Productive farm businesses:
Economic benefits:
• Contribute to UK economic growth
& jobs
• Continue to underpin the food
industry – our largest
manufacturing sector
• Support vibrant and sustainable
rural communities & non-food
sectors (e.g. tourism, renewables)
UK agriculture should be Progressive and Sustainable, both as businesses
and in delivering benefits to society at large
Societal benefits:
• Contribute to increased UK food
security, with safe, affordable
food produced to high standards
• Deliver public/environmental
goods - “You can’t go Green if
you’re in the Red…”
• Manage the c. 75% of the UK
land mass currently farmed
123. Focus is on the four main policy areas of:
NFU’s Policy Priorities
TRADE
LABOUR
DOMESTIC
AGRICULTURAL POLICY
REGULATION
126. TRADE
EU Common External Tariff rates under WTO
Not to mention non-tariff barriers – entry checks, border delays, certification,
standards, etc
127. TRADE
Best access to EU markets
• 72% of food exports to EU. Some sectors very dependent – e.g. 38% of
UK lamb exported into EU
• “Free and frictionless” trade: Zero tariffs and low non-tariff barriers
Develop and expand non-EU markets
• Government must ensure trade with the rest of the world is on level-
playing field – same conditions applying to imports as UK production
• Farming and food to feature from day one in trade talks, not
afterthought
• Identify and develop opportunities in existing and new markets
128. LABOUR
Issue for whole food chain – not just agriculture/horticulture & relates to
both seasonal and permanent workforce
Urgent concern over labour for horticulture, pigs and poultry sectors. E.g.
horticulture expected to need 95,000 seasonal workers by 2021
Government must:
• Introduce measures to ensure adequate supply of seasonal and
permanent labour in food and farming sectors
• Grant EU workers UK right of residency
• R&D and investment funding to increase competitiveness
129. DOMESTIC AGRICULTURAL POLICY
A package of measures to enable farm businesses to be competitive,
profitable and progressive.
Maintain current levels of financial support, delivered across three key
themes:
• Volatility: mitigation, currently through direct payment. Other mechanisms
could include insurance schemes, bonds, etc
• Environment: Broad farmed environment scheme; Additional designated
areas/high value schemes (e.g. SSSI, National Parks)
• Productivity: Aimed at competitiveness, profitability, investment (on farm;
agri-tech). Capital grants, advice, and training, knowledge exchange…
Emphasis on each will depend on impact of Brexit – positive or negative – on
UK agriculture (e.g. trade deals/labour availability/Great Repeal Bill)
130. REGULATION
Opportunity to devise a regulatory environment fit for purpose
Balancing act – better regulation v complicating Brexit process. Issue of
timing…
• Protects animal and
public health, and the
environment, while
supporting innovative
and productive
agriculture
• Reduces red-tape on
farmers
• Complements the
requirements of our
new trading
arrangements
• Ensures a smooth
transition at the point of
Brexit
132. Environment Conference
“What next for the Countryside Post Brexit”?
Hosted By Julie Girling,
MEP for the South West & Gibraltar
www.juliegirling.com @juliegirling #envifuture
133. Richard Wakeford
Visiting Professor of Land Use & Rural Development at
Birmingham City University
Brexit – How to use the opportunity to
take control of agricultural policy
134. +
Professor Richard Wakeford,
Birmingham City University
Richard.wakeford@ruralstrategy.co.uk
Royal Agricultural University, March 2017
What next for the
countryside
– post BREXIT?
“Taking control” of
agriculture policy
136. +
The optimist and BREXIT:
new freedoms and opportunities?
Stronger trade deals
More sensible use of public funds without Brussels overlay
Control of national borders
Restore Britain’s special legal system
Deregulate EU’s “costly mass of laws”
Improve the economy & generate new jobs
Regenerate Britain’s fisheries
Avoid EU healthcare harmonisation
Reduce welfare payments to non-UK EU citizens
Restore British customs and traditions
137. +
Particular agricultural drivers for change?
Costly mass of rules currently translated into UK law (eg on Environmental Impact
Assessment, GMOs, 160 page “Higher Tier Manual” etc)
Common Agricultural Policy payments widely discredited – especially value for money
of Basic Payment Scheme:
Carry out agricultural activity
Maintain land in Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition
Statutory Management Requirements “Cross Compliance” covering:
the environment, food safety, animal and plant health and animal welfare
Keep comprehensive, accurate and up-to-date records
Rural Payments Agency demands and performance
138. +
Latest European Commission analysis of CAP
implementation
In CAP implementation, for most Member States the historical factor more important
than the three general CAP objectives
Limited correlation between pillar 1 and 2 measures
Implementation focused strongly on the general objective of locally viable food
production
No systematic synergistic use of instruments to address particular objectives
Lack of appropriate tailoring and targeting of Pillar 1 instruments and Pillar 2
measures
Increased administrative complexity due to changes
139. +
Lessons on CAP for the EU going forward
The study
confirms that the CAP has become more complex
reveals that the Member States’ strategy to address the 3 CAP
objectives is not sufficiently documented
Raises concerns about the potential impact of the CAP
This means
Seek simplification to limit the growing concern of increased
administrative burdens
Exchanging good practices between countries to propomote
simplification
Looking for a more tailored approach to the Green Payment
As we each design our own processes in England, Wales,
Scotland and Northern Ireland – and maybe regionally too – we
should learn from this Commission research
140. +
So - new opportunities BREXIT will bring for
agriculture?
The optimist looks forward to new freedoms to operate and
trade - at the heart of five UK Government principles
tariff-free and frictionless cross-border trade with Europe – important
given that EU single market takes 60% of exports, but cost of trade
deal (single market, EFTA or WTO)
a more productive workforce using latest technology and data
farmers incentivised and rewarded for caring for the environment;
twin goals of productive farming and environmental improvement
promotion of animal and plant health and welfare
resilience against disease affecting farm operations; and in protcting
communities from flooding
141. +
New opportunities may bring new challenges too…
And yet, the agribusiness sector faces considerable uncertainty (eg
access to labour, tariff barriers, future support payments from UK
governments – given competition from the NHS)
Will WTO global trade rules open up our domestic markets to lower cost
imports produced with fewer environmental and societal safeguards:
eg GMO products (concerning to some consumers)
routine antibiotic use in imported beef
Farm and food products from nations not willing to demonstrate action
to implement COP21 action on climate change through agricultural
measures?
And there would still be WTO* (and potentially EU) rules about
government payments to our farmers; and about whether our products can
meet other nations’ standards
Would UK really “take back control”?
* BTAMS = Bound Total Aggregate Measure of
Support
142. +
Will the UK be influential against
unfair rules over exports?
“America First”
Past challenge of exporting
Scottish seed potatoes to
China
Tariff free exports to
Europe challenged if our
government departs much
from EU rules
Could we find ourselves
effectively committed to
working within the rules of
the next CAP reform?
143. +
Futures thinking?
“America first” motivated by a desire in middle US to return to the
rosy days when smaller cities were rich in smaller businesses
providing employment
“BREXIT” similarly harks back to the world when more of our
economy related to the Commonwealth
50 years since the designation of the Cotswolds AONB, many
people want to believe in an unchanging protected landscape
25+ years since Chris Patten’s comprehensive environment White
Paper launched a “national countryside initiative” offering incentive
payments to landowners and farmers to manage or recreate
landscapes – beyond Environmentally Sensitive Areas
Looking forward is hard! Delivery takes time.
146. +
Factor in technological advances
Rapid improvements in satellite technology, reducing the time
needed to provide precision land-use data to benefit farmers,
foresters and fishermen
New technology in cultivation, with autonomous tractors reducing
the need for a rural workforce still further
Big data; ever increasing information influencing consumers –
some FAKE
Rural-urban divide disappears, as more work can be done
remotely
Where will the processing and retail chain go next?
Apps to help us eat well (and source the food we really need for
health)
147. +
BREXIT; an opportunity to deliver?
• “Subsidy system broken”
• “Farmers going out of business”
• “State of wildlife in steep decline
• … because of intensive
agriculture”
• “Taxpayers should only pay
public subsidy to farmers in
return for things that the market
won’t pay for but which are
valued and needed by the public”
• “The current system rewards
people for the hectares they own,
with very inadequate standards
for wildlife and the environment,”
148. +
Opportunity: translate Basic Payments into “outcome
specific” schemes
Green Alliance proposes a Natural Infrastructure Scheme (NIS)
£3.1 billion spent on CAP in the UK currently encourages land
managers to maximise land available for agricultural use and props up
uneconomic farming
Farmers and other land managers could financially benefit from
environmental improvements such as flood alleviation and habitat
creation
£2.4 billion a year spent tackling water pollution, water treatment,
investing in flood resilience and dealing with damage caused by river
flooding; paying farmers to use natural engineering and land
management in the upper reaches of a catchment can be more cost
effective than paying for hard defences, end of pipe water treatment
and the effects of flooding
‘Payments for ecosystem services’ could become a mainstream
market, reversing declines in nature, and supporting new,
environmentally beneficial approaches to farming in the UK
150. +
Three factors of productivity
The OECD approach;
Consider capital;
Consider labour;
Consider the land
Capital is the concern of the Chancellor of Exchequer
Labour is the concern of the Business Secretary
Land is the responsibility of … DCLG, DEFRA, Transport, Culture etc
The three 1947 Acts – a joined up approach to securing the best value from our land,
and from the people who worked it, with a view to building up the capital of our nation
151. +
A new 'Department for Land Use' should be created:
Lord Deben
"no hope of sensible land use while planning is imprisoned within the Department for
Communities and Local Government, agriculture in the Department for Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs, infrastructure in the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, and
long-term transport planning in the Department for Transport” Lord Deben – in a CPRE report
March 2017
the creation of a "Department of Land Use would bring the strategic elements of all these
together”; planners should be shifted away from development management to focus on
strategic land use issues
"Planning, environment, agriculture, and infrastructure make a cohesive whole and taken
together enable us to decide what kind of country we want to leave to our grandchildren"
152. +
Futures thinking: functions of rural land
Land managers provide
Provisioning services
Regulating services
Cultural services
…and who benefits from these?
...and if we put value on the flow of renewable benefits, we can start to calculate the
full capital value – for society and for the businesses with a right to draw on it –>
NATURAL CAPITAL
Can Dieter Helm’s Natural Capital Committee help to bring economic rationale to
disparate services?
153. +
Land: a basis for provisioning services (often
consumed in urban areas)
products obtained from ecosystems
Food e.g. crops, fruit, fish
Fibre and fuel e.g. timber, wool
Biochemicals, natural medicines and pharmaceuticals
Genetic resources: genes and genetic information used for animal/plant breeding and
biotechnology
Ornamental resources e.g. shells, flowers
154. +
Land: a basis for regulating processes (often benefiting
urban dwellers)
Air-quality maintenance: ecosystems contribute chemicals to, and
extract chemicals from the atmosphere
Climate regulation e.g. land cover can affect local temperature and
precipitation; globally ecosystems affect greenhouse gas
sequestration and emissions
Water regulation: ecosystems affect e.g. the timing and magnitude of
runoff, flooding etc.
Erosion control: vegetative cover plays an important role in soil
retention/prevention of land/asset erosion
Water purification/detoxification: ecosystems can be a source of water
impurities but can also help to filter out/decompose organic waste
Natural hazard protection e.g. storms, floods, landslides
Bioremediation of waste i.e. removal of pollutants through storage,
dilution, transformation and burial
155. + Rural growth potential in cultural services
(enjoyed by urban dwellers too)
Many societies place high value on the maintenance of important landscapes or species
Aesthetic values: many people find beauty in various aspects of ecosystems
Recreation and ecotourism bring visitors and opportunities for business growth
Rural areas are the inspiration for art, folklore, architecture etc
Many religions attach spiritual and religious values to ecosystems and landscapes
Social relations: ecosystems affect the types of social relations that are established e.g. fishing
societies
156. +
The context of geography
Global, national, regional, local … different values will be ascribed to different services
(Romania vs UK; Fenland vs Wales)
How to engage communities at different levels (town vs country?)
How to put values on the services delivered, other than by compensation for
theoretical production foregone?
“strike the right balance between national frameworks for support measures whilst
tailoring them to local landscapes and catchments” Andrea Leadsom, 21st February
2017
Neighbourhood planning – localism doesn’t extend to knowledge about the benefits
taxpayers buy from farmers and landowners!
157. +
Scottish farm accounts:
• Government grants and
subsidies of over £500
million
• Without them, no net
income from farming at all
• So, the support must be
justified by other services
farmers deliver
• But, even with same cash
post BREXIT, buying more
specific services creates
challenges elsewhere
• Hence the call for a long
transition period to new
payments for “ecosystems
services” beyond mere food
production
159. +
Futures thinking: Land Use, Land Use Change and
Forestry
Challenges:
• Agricultural non-CO2 emissions =
10.3% of EU total emissions
• Potentially responsible for one third
of all EU emissions
• One half from soils (mainly nitrous
oxide); one third from animals
(mainly methane from cattle); one
sixth from manure management
(nitrous oxide and methane)
• Increased productivity since 1990s
has helped but further potential
limited
• Plant more woodland; a challenge
for farmers?
160. +
Examples of Reduction Opportunities in the LULUCF
Sector
Increase carbon storage by using land differently or
maintain carbon storage by avoiding land degradation
Encourage the transformation of cropland to forest
Avoid the conversion of forest land to settlements
Improve management practices on existing land-use
types
Reduce soil erosion to minimize losses in soil carbon storage
Make more efficient use of Nitrogen fertiliser
Make more efficient use of livestock feed
Use crop residue for bio-energy
Plant after forest disturbances to accelerate vegetation growth
and minimize soil carbon losses
161. +
The LULUCF challenge for the policy makers – for UK
policymakers post BREXIT!
What instruments? Fiscal or regulatory? Measurable/enforceable? Global, EU or
national targets/instruments?
How to identify trade-offs between foresters providing sinks and farmers creating
emissions?
How to use marginal land if agriculture better managed, and forests operate to full
sink potential
Can a plan to deliver the committed reductions create positive opportunities for rural
growth – new forests, better managed; new investments in farming; better use of
residue and food waste?
162. +
… and for farmers and fishermen etc, what role
for consumers?
165. +
Food and health outcomes; research has already
identified costs for society
Big data research on retail food purchases shows clear links to obesity
among the families of purchasers
Research has informed a new approach to help fast food outlets develop
a toolkit to cut down on fat, sugar and salt
Food price promotions and public health; research has explored the
obesity impact of “buy one, get one free” of cheap unhealthy foods; and
children’s exposure to unhealthy food advertisements
Research has delivered evidence that poorer people are less physically
active … and that children from poorer families are nearly three times as
likely to be obese
BUT; so much research is funded by big food and drugs businesses,
making governments reluctant to recommend healthier diets
166. +
The case of type 2 diabetes
Healthier eating half the solution; less sugar, less carbohydrates
(potatoes, cereal etc), more fish, meat, dairy products?
Are improved health outcomes relevant to food security; and to the
food chain as a whole? … and to economic progress
Should the increasing cost of health services across Europe and
globally be a cross cutting driver of EU funded research (ie big and
strategic, rather than fragmented, compartmentalised calls?)
Emerging new advice to type 2 diabetes sufferers:
Cut carbohydrates; focus diet on protein rich and full fat products
“Butter is one of the most natural fats you can buy. It is just churned
cream from a cow. Ideally, opt for grass-fed butter; it has a greater
nutrient profile and a better omega 3-6 ratio.”
New approaches to pork production in China: shift from backyard
pigs to mass production, but fed on imported maize…
168. +
Bord Bia -> Origin Green Ireland
• Rich soils -> lush green grass
(300 days a year grazing)
• Carbon efficient dairy and
beef production
• Low water footprint
• 80% of agriculture =
grassland
169. +
Tomorrow’s global food supply: producers’
challenge today
With business as usual, feeding a population of 9 billion might require “60% more
food, 50% more energy and 40% more water” – Uni of Minnesota (2015)
“About 24% of all calories produced for human consumption are lost or wasted” World
Resources Institute (2013)
“Malnutrition must be addressed by adopting a food systems approach- looking at the
entire food system from production to consumption” FAO (2016)
How will UK Government policy, post BREXIT address global food insecurity issues –
feeding into government policies and practice?
170. +
Food security and forests (including biodiversity)
“Inseparable: Forests, Wildlife and Food Security” – high level discussion at the FAO
“It is time for a change in consciousness – it is a fact that agriculture and forestry can
no longer be treated in isolation. Linking the two is imperative for socio-economic
development in the 21st century” - Evelyn Nguleka, President of the World Farmers’
Organization
Conclusions from World Forest Week
develop integrated land use strategies taking into account the role of forests for water, soil,
climate and habitats
strengthen land governance by improving tenure security and encouraging partnerships
monitor and collect data on the effectiveness of governance mechanisms and on social,
economic and environmental values of forests
171. +
Food security and the impact on environment
What steps are required to ensure the land can continue supplying important
goods and services – including an increasing demand for food - in the face
of a changing climate?
Land management to:
lock up carbon in soil;
manage use of water; and
reduce risk of city flooding downstream?
Timber production as part of an adaptation strategy to lock up carbon
Biodiversity goals which require habitat for wildlife
Action to cope with sea level rise on the coast; managed retreat and
coastal plains no longer available for food production
What do these goals mean for human consumption habits, food retailer
marketing, food processors and farmers? … and energy, transport etc
172. +
Future policy is not just post-CAP; and not just
agriculture and the environment
Other societal challenges Our relevant suggested areas of integration
Climate action:
• Environment
• Resource use
• Raw materials
• Agricultural and forestry practice (mitigation & adaptation)
• Mesoplankton
• Circular economy: reducing food, farm and forestry waste;
avoiding plastic soup in the sea
• Optimal use of land and sea: food, energy, carbon sink
Europe in the changing world
• Inclusive societies
• Food as a unifying strand between distinctive societal groups
Health
• Demographic change
• Wellbeing
• Food production, manufacturing, marketing, information
• Ecosystems services from land
• Food safety
Energy
• Secure, clean, efficient
• Food production efficiency
Secure society
• Freedom
• Security of citizens
• Resilient supply systems
• Protection of facilities
• Food security (ie growing enough)
Transport
• Green
• Integrated
• Supply chain logistics/packaging
• Air miles
• Warehouse to my house delivery
FOOD 2030 linking
most of the societal
challenges?
173. +
“What next for the countryside,
post BREXIT?”
New freedoms and opportunities – after tough negotiations
An opportunity for more societal clarity about the countryside we want, and at
what cost
The need to see land itself as the basic factor of productivity – requiring joined
up policies at all levels (Lord ~Deben’s challenge)
The need to optimise the ecosystems services land can deliver, sustainably
(Dieter Helm’s challenge)
In particular, look for the role of woodland creation, especially to help achieve
climate change goals and flood management
More rational policy measures – but transition a challenge because of potential
losers
An end to end question: can farmers influence what society eats – and thus help
tackle the current societal cost of unwise diets*? * =
according to emerging research on carbohydrate consumption
174. Environment Conference
“What next for the Countryside Post Brexit”?
Hosted By Julie Girling,
MEP for the South West & Gibraltar
www.juliegirling.com @juliegirling #envifuture
177. Environment Conference
“What next for the Countryside Post Brexit”?
Hosted By Julie Girling,
MEP for the South West & Gibraltar
www.juliegirling.com @juliegirling #envifuture
Hinweis der Redaktion
GUK = coalition of 13 major env orgs, with a combined public membership of 7.9m.
Coalition launched in Dec 2016, united in a belief that leaving the EU is a pivotal moment to restore & enhance the UK’s env.
When thinking about the opportunities from Brexit, the first manifestation has been a significant coming together of env organisations, united by a common cause.
My family farm
But having said I’m an optimist & believer in hope... I do just need to set some context.
56% spp declined in last 50 years
15% at risk of UK extinction
UK one of the most denuded countries of nature in the world
Time is running out – but if we act NOW...
421m fewer birds in Europe over the last 30 years.
Around 90 % of these losses were from the 36 most common and widespread species, including house sparrows, skylarks, grey partridges and starlings, highlighting the need for greater efforts to halt the continent-wide declines of our most familiar countryside birds
The Living Planet Index reveals that global populations of fish, birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles declined by 58 per cent between 1970 and 2012
Every year we suffer a net loss of about 15.3b trees. Half a percent of all the world'sp trees every year.
Our global response has been protected areas, but they are not stemming the tide. Increasingly they are becoming little islands. Not enough to sustain populations against changes being made in the wider world.
We keep creating targets as a response e.g. aichi. We are not hitting targets, definitely not exceeding them.
We need to change the paradigm for the way we think about the env. A protectionist approach limits our ambition. Env growth is about exceeding & growing.
Scale of loss has been uneven across different habitats & species groups.
NB farmland and more recently seabirds.
Particularly pronounced in specialist (cf generalist) species
So we can either view these rather depressing statistics as reason to give up... or as an opportunity, coupled with this period of immense change, to shift the paradigm and move from documenting loss & missing targets to creating true environmental growth.
Secure the benefits of existing environmental laws as the UK leaves the European Union, and pass an ambitious new Environment Act
Secure the UK’s global climate leadership
3. Introduce new policies and investment that create thriving farming and fishing industries
Securing existing environmental laws & passing an ambitious new Environment Act
Fully transpose and maintain existing EU environmental laws and principles through the Repeal Bill, and ensure we have the necessary governance arrangements in place for robust implementation and enforcement in future.
Lead the world by setting measurable milestones for environmental restoration and high standards for pollution and resource efficiency, as part of a strong 25 year plan, reinforced in law in an ambitious new Environment Act, which:
Sets ambitious milestones for rebuilding UK’s natural assets
Creates powerful statutory committee to monitor progress
Estabish effective approach to env regulation, enforcement & accountability for SoN across all govmt depts
Ensure integration with ag & fisheries policies
Remember, the UK played a leading role in creating the Nature Directives. Stanley Johnson – father of Foreign Minister and lead Brexit campaigner – was one of the chief architects of the Habitats Directive.
Recent fitness check of the Nature Directives deemed them fit for purpose, but more work could be done in improving their implementation.
Cotswold Beechwoods SAC
Create a robust framework for environmental accountability that raises our game, to offset the loss of the EU framework and to ensure that government aspirations are matched by real delivery.
e.g. Walshall Moor case.
Having assessed Natural England's explanation and information, we considered its decisions were in breach of the requirements of the European Habitats Directive and Birds Directive to protect the South Pennine Moors. For this reason, we submitted a formal Complaint to the European Commission to seek to get the decisions overturned and appropriate conservation management put in place that will enable the blanket bog habitats (and the wildlife that depends on them) to be restored to and then maintained in favourable condition.
The RSPB understands that the European Commission has now begun legal action against the UK Government in relation to these matters. While we do not know the content of their action, it appears the Commission share our concerns over bad application of the Habitats Directive and we assume they were not satisfied that the UK's proposed actions would be sufficient to safeguard and restore the protected blanket bog habitats of European and global conservation importance
Affirm ongoing investment in, and deployment of, clean energy infrastructure and efficient vehicles, buildings and appliances; maintain high standards and financial support for greenhouse gas reduction, energy efficiency and air quality.
Co-operation of ambition low carbon goals
We must ensure that EU climate ambition does not decline after it loses the UK’s leadership, because continued co-operation on climate change will help the UK to deliver on its domestic and international obligations. The UK should not disrupt the EU’s agreed 2030 climate and energy framework as it exits, and should promote more effective carbon pricing mechanisms.
New CFP generally a positive policy – need to maintain the best of this and continue improving.
Continue to support sustainable fishing levels, introducing a domestic legal requirement to fish at a level that allows fish stocks to recover and to document fully all fish caught.
Effective legislation & fisheries agreements
Setting sustainable levels – legal requirement to fish below Maximum Sustainable Yield thresholds by 2020. Ongoing commitment to the precautionary approach.
Coherent network of Marine Protected Areas
Sound science – to underpin fishing limits
End discards
Shared management with neighbouring states
Good governance with effective monitoring & enforcement
Investment in technical measure, such as gear selectivity & other measures to protect vulnerable species & deep sea ecosystems
Leaving the European Union will be one of the most defining events for farming and our environment in living memory.
Potential triple whammy for farmers:
1. Loss of support
2. Loss of (EU) market
3. Being undercut by other markets (e.g. NZ, US, Canada, Brazil)
There are significant risks, but it also provides an unprecedented opportunity to revitalise our countryside in a way that meets the needs of people and the environment, for generations to come.
Our vision is for a thriving, healthy countryside that delivers multiple benefits for society. As well as products such as food and timber, we need the natural environment for services like clean water and healthy soils, and all the well-being benefits that contact with abundant and diverse nature brings. In turn,
these play a key role in supporting a prosperous economy.
The inescapable truth about biodiversity & the farmed environment...
54% decline between 1970-2014
Intensification of agriculture the overwhelming driver of biodiversity decline in UK.
75% UK land = agriculture
NB Climate change impact as well.
Fundamentally, the long-term future of farming is at risk if the natural systems on which it is based are depleted.
But there are plenty of examples of where wildlife is recovering in the farmed environment – thanks to great farmers with support from orgs like RSPB, FWAG, TWTs, NE etc and the financial support of targeted agri-env schemes.
Stone curlew
169 pairs 1991 to c.400 now
(30 to 150 in Wessex)
25 years of working with cirl buntings.
2016 national survey – 1,078 pairs.
Up from <100 in 1991
Sustainable popl on Roseland (65 territories 2016), following reintroductions 2006-2011.
Some places which have successfully trialled local implementation of outcome-focused, farmer-led AE schemes e.g. Dartmoor Farming Futures...
... and where private sector investment – in this case from water companies – in taking a catchment management approach has both enhanced the landscape’s ability to improve water quality and attenuate impacts of flooding, whilst improving habitats such as blanket bog, with positive results for species such as dunlin.
1. We evaluated the scheme in three contrasting regions defined by soil type (National Character Areas): arable East Anglia, the mixed farming landscape of the Cotswolds & Oxfordshire and the grassland-dominated landscape of the West Midlands
2. We selected 68 HLS agreements based on presence of target species, and deployment of bird focused options. Agreements began in 2006 (53) or 2007 (15). ES options account for 7-8% of the farmed area.
Numbers of FBI indicator species doubled in the WM in just 6 years
Farming an essential part of delivering nature. Farming per se isn’t a problem, it is THE solution.
Indeed, most conservation management is done through farming (livestock).
The issue is fundamentally about what choices – through policy and incentivisation – we want to make for the 75% of the UK which is farmed. How big a feature of these policies do we want to make (rewarding) environmental improvement?
We need to replace the outdated Common Agricultural Policy with new and ambitious policies that work for farming and the environment, are fair to farmers and taxpayers, and which provide real value for money. We cannot afford to miss this chance.
Lead the world in high env & animal welfare stanards in agr, to establish a global reputation for quality food that people can trust.
If we are to avoid a race to the bottom, public policy must take an active role in enabling farmers to do more for the environment, whilst ensuring that a sector that maintains high environmental and animal welfare standards is not put at a competitive disadvantage by UK trade policy.
For England, this will mean a sustainable farming and land use policy that encourages established agro-ecological approaches such as organic farming, and provides
the tools for all farmers and land managers to develop more resilient and sustainable businesses, and meet the challenge of restoring the natural environment within a generation. With the natural environment centre stage, there is a strong case for public funding for agriculture and land management, building on a foundation
of high standards.
A shared countryside – we all have a stake: needs to be an open debate
Nature everywhere – thriving env across the whole of the countryside, not just protected areas
For future generations – each generation should leave the env in a better state that the previous (building our stock of nat cap)
Value for money – taxpayers’ £ must be invested in public benefits that the market does not provide, inc soils, wildlife, better animal welfare & beautiful places for all to enjoy. In the long-term, the market needs to better complement public funding.
Unacceptable to harm nature – strong legislative baseline to safeguard nat env and protect the interests of society
Easy to help nature – simple systems for accessing financial support & advice
Fair to farmers – govmy should ensure farmers receive a fair share the the profit generated in the supply chain
Built on strong evidence & past successes – e.g. Successful AE schemes
Coherent with other policy areas – e.g. Trade, food procurement, public health, heritage, tourism & CC
Right action at the right scale – e.g. Catchment-based approach
Vital that Govmt & politicians lead. Must demonstrate their commitment to our shared inheritance (and “leaving the env better for the next generation”) through bold action at home and renewed cooperation with our friends & allies abroad.
Need for better transparency, governance & democratic scrutiny = oversight & accountability.
The Repeal Bill must:
1. Convert all existing laws and principles into domestic law in the UK & devolved administrations
2. Ensure any changes to existing law are done with full role for parliament and, where relevant, the devolved administrations
3. Commit to introducing new governance arrangements, to ensure robust regulatory, monitoring, enforcement and other functions currently provided by EU institutions.
Public support for this vision
Introduce myself [RAPIDLY] as more a user of research (interested in evidence and knowledge based policymaking) than an academic analyst identifying gaps in research or work under way that will need follow on projects.
Recognise the need for excellent science, research that helps industrial leadership, and the need to address key societal challenges.
Interdependence between “new openings for rural growth” and “development of human and social capital in rural areas” is important; OECD, EC, national governments can highlight the potential for growth, but are local people and organisations equipped to deliver?
Local experience; how much research at the EC level actually influences outcomes on the ground? Evaluation is important. HERCULES study looking at special vehicles to manage cultural landscapes – such as the Cotswolds AONB. Easy to report on the bodies and what they do; harder to evaluate their achievements and thus recommend best practice.
Remind ourselves of the range of ecosystem services rural areas can offer urban areas (and the return factor that many services needed by rural people can only be delivered from cities - which is why it’s wrong to use the phrase rural economy in any meaningful way)
FLASH THROUGH THESE SLIDES IN 20 SECONDS EACH!
All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?