Brian Yolitz, MnSCU Associate Vice Chancellor of Facilities
This presentation will focus on and answer questions about the MnSCU system’s legislative capital bonding request.
1. The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator.
Minnesota State College Student
Association – Business Meeting
Mesabi Range Community and Technical College – Virginia
September 14, 2013
Capital Planning Update
Brian Yolitz
Associate Vice Chancellor – Facilities
2. Purpose
Overview of the FY2014 capital bonding
request
System facility resources and planning
Be available to answer any questions in
the facilities portfolio
2
3. Overview
Background
System Facilities Infrastructure
Process overview
2014 capital bonding details
Process
Program
The way ahead
Opportunities for your involvement
Upcoming events
Questions and Discussion
4. Facility Space – Square Footage
27.8 million total gross
square feet of facility
space
5 Mall of Americas
Roughly 1/3 of the State of
Minnesota’s facility space
54 Campuses:
Largest:
St Cloud State University
3.258 million sq ft
Smallest:
Riverland Community
College – Owatonna
27,600 sq ft
4
21.687
4.843
1.025 0.1120.167
Academic Revenue Fund
Revenue Fund - Ramps Mothballed
Others
Gross Square Footage
(Millions)
8. Facility Space – Total Value
$7.3 billion replacement
value
Total Backlog: $818M
Total 5-Year Renewal: $523M
Facility Condition Index:
Academic: .113
Revenue Fund: .086
Investment avenues
Capital bonding
HEAPR and Major Projects
Revenue Fund
Local campus funding
8
$6,232.28
$1,225.04
$72.46 $29.35 $38.86
Academic Revenue Fund
Revenue Fund - Ramps Mothballed
Others
Replacement Value
($ Millions)
9. Total Capital Investment History
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Capital Projects HEAPR Revenue Fund
9
Millions
10. Operating Funds – R&R
Campuses, on average, have exceeded the recommended
$1/sq. ft. annual R&R guideline for academic spaces:
5 year average: $29.5M
Potential annual funding: $30M
10
$27.5
$25.8
$28.8
$32.6 $33.0
$20
$25
$30
$35
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Annual R&R Investment ($M)
Annual R&R Investment ($M)
Goal: $21.7M
11. Program Development
Board
Action Campus Tours
Legislative
Session Design and Construction
11
Bonding:
• HEAPR and Projects
2012
2014
2016
Revenue Fund:
2011
2013
2015
2012
2012
2013
2013
2014
2014
2015
2015 2016
Basic Capital Timelines
Fiscal Year:
Calendar Year:
Program
Development
Design and ConstructionBoard
Action
Bond
Sale
Program Development Design andBoard
Action
Bond
Sale
Design and Construction
Program Development
Board
Action
Legislative
Session Design and ConstructionCampus Tours
Today
13. 2014 Capital Budget Timeline
13
System Strategic Plan
Facilities Master
Plans
Facilities Requirements
• Maintain, Repair, Renovate, R
enew, Demolish, New
• HEAPR
• Capital Bonding
• Revenue Fund
• Other
Project Predesign
• Basic Information
• Scope
• Cost
• Schedule
• Strategy
• Contracting
• Design and Construct
• Design then Construct
Board Capital Budget
Guidelines
• Each biennium
• Program focus
• Size
• Criteria elements
Capital Project Scoring
• Cross functional teams
• Campus and Staff
• Admin and faculty
• Project Predesign data
• Board Guidelines
• Individual Project Scores
Chancellor Review and
Analysis
• Scoring team results
• Presidential feedback
• Program adjustments
• Chancellor’s
Recommendation:
• Project list
• Priority
Governor
Approval
Legislative Action
• House and Senate Capital
Investment Committees
• Conference Committee
• Capital Bonding Bill
Board Approval
• Committee and
Board Hearing
• Testimony
• Projects and Priority
Approval
• Initial Direction for
the future planning
MMB Review
• Review and
adjustment
• Integration with
other state agency
requests
• Support legislative
visits
• Governor
Recommendation
development
June 2013
March – May
2013
January
2013
April 2012
July 2013 – January 2014
February – May 2014
May 2014
14. State Capital Budget Priorities
State established budget priorities under Minn. Stat. 135A.034:
(1) maintenance and preservation of existing facilities;
(2) completion of projects that have received funding;
(3) updating facilities to meet contemporary needs;
(4) providing geographic distribution of capital projects; and
(5) maximizing the use of non-state contributions.
14
15. Board Guidelines for 2014
Overarching Principles:
Take care of what we have
Make campus space more efficient and flexible
Mothball or demolish what is no longer viable in terms of
conditions, operating costs, and programs, and
Only consider new square footage if the requirement meets the three
priorities in the strategic framework
Strategic Framework:
Access to an extraordinary education
Partner of choice
Highest value/most affordable option
15
16. Capital Project Scoring
Scoring mechanism built on Board Guidelines
Access to an extraordinary education – 30%
Classroom redesign, 4-year program in metro, success of
underrepresented students, college/university
collaboration, academic program demand
Partner of choice – 20%
Emerging and sustained workforce and community needs, STEM
programming, increased recruitment, retention, completion and
transfer within system
High value/most affordable option – 50%
Reduced or sharing of costs, asset preservation/backlog
reduction, space use, projects costs, campus R&R investment
history, financial impacts, CFI, utility/resource conservation
Prior approval and Institutional priority – +10 Points for each
Executed by representatives from across the system
16
17. Higher Education Asset Preservation
and Replacement (HEAPR)
Authorized in 135A.046 – Asset Preservation and Replacement
Number 1 priority to take care of what we have
Used for:
Preservation of building interiors and exteriors
Renewal
Code Compliance
Energy efficiency improvements
Keep Up / Catch Up Strategy:
Address anticipated needs
Reduce backlog by 50% over 10 years
Calls for $110 million in HEAPR investment per biennium
17
18. Keep Up / Catch Up
Keep Up: Address annual renewal needs :
$414M/5 = $83M annually
Catch Up: Reduce backlog by 50% in 10 years:
$705M X 50% / 10 = $35M annually
Total required asset preservation investment:
$118M annually
Available resources/funding streams:
Operating Funds – R&R
Capital Investment – Major renovation and repair projects
Capital Investment – HEAPR
18
19. Investment Needs
Available resources/funding streams:
Annual R&R:
Goal of $1/sq. ft. = $21.7M
5 year average: $29.5M
Assume: $25.5M
Major renovation and repair projects:
Assume $37.5M
Based on capital project funding:
$154.3M in major projects = roughly $77M annually
Assume 50% of projects HEAPR/HEAPR-like = $37.5M
HEAPR requirement:
$118M - $25.5M - $37.5M = $55M annually -> $110M over a biennium
19
20. Investment in Minnesota
Asset preservation:
110 HEAPR Projects at 47 campuses
53% improves building exterior integrity: roofs, walls, windows
40% building infrastructure systems: HVAC, electrical, plumbing
5% code and standard compliance
Improves existing educational and student support space
Renovates and renews 743,000 sq. ft. at 26 campuses
Select expansion to meet workforce needs
STEM, allied health, transportation, general studies and workforce
skills
2 universities and 5 colleges
Replacement or elimination of obsolete space:
Within capital projects at 6 campuses
Demolition initiative at up to 16 campuses
20
21. Board Approved 2014 Capital Program
General Obligation funding: $227.7 million
System financing: $58.8 million
Total Capital Program: $286.5 million
Major elements:
$130.6 million – HEAPR and Demolition
$155.9 million – Capital project design and construction
21
22. 22
FY2014
Capital Budget Request
2014 2016 New Renovate Renewal
Demo/
Mothball
1 HEAPR Systemwide
System
wide
Higher Education Asset Preservation
and Replacement
D/C $130,576,000
2 Metropolitan State University St. Paul Metro
Science Education Center new
construction
C $35,865,000 65,712 3,500
3 Bemidji State University Bemidji
North
West
Memorial, Decker, and Sanford Hall
renovation, demolition; design, post-
demolition Hagg Sauer
D/C $13,790,000 4,000 46,700 11,800 17,000
4 Lake Superior College Duluth
North
East
Allied Health ('86 Wing)
Revitalization renovation
D/C $5,266,000 36,500 4,500
5
Minneapolis Community &
Technical College
Minneapolis Metro
Workforce Program Phase 2
renovation
D/C $3,600,000 90,470
6
Saint Paul College
(Initiatives)
St. Paul Metro
Initiatives: Culinary Arts Lab, and
Machine Tool renovation
D/C $1,500,000 16,773 10,777
7
Minnesota State College -
Southeast Technical
(Initiatives)
Red Wing,
Winona
South
East
Initiatives: Welding/Indust. Labs,
Science Labs, and Multipurpose
Classrooms renovation
D/C $1,700,000 14,250
8 Central Lakes College Staples
North
West
Campus Rightsizing renovation D/C $4,581,000 7,435 56,895 17,810
9
Minnesota State University,
Mankato
Mankato
South
East
Clinical Science Building new
construction, renovation
C $25,818,000 $4,444,000 55,717 13,191 8,584
10
Minnesota State Community
& Technical College
Moorhead
North
West
Transportation Center addition D/C $6,544,000 22,630 23,186 2,900
11
Rochester Community and
Technical College
Rochester
South
East
Design, post-demolition Plaza,
Memorial & Art buildings
D $1,000,000 13,530
12
Minnesota West Community
and Technical College
(Initiatives)
Jackson,
Canby
South
West
Initiatives: ITV Classrooms,
Powerline Training Facility, and
Geothermal System renovation
D/C $3,487,000 10,900 44,090 18,000
13
Dakota County Technical
College
Rosemount Metro
Transportation & Emerging
Technologies lab renovation
C $7,586,000 42,580 22,970
14
Century College
(Initiatives)
White Bear
Lake
Metro
Initiatives: Digital Fabrication,
Kitchen space, and Solar Panel
System renovation
D/C $2,020,000 6,000 1,700
15
Northland Community
Technical College
Thief River
Falls
North
West
Aviation Maintenance Facility
Expansion demolition and addition
C $5,864,000 20,410 5,790 21,680
16
(NHED) Northeast Higher
Education District (Capital
and Initiatives)
Itasca,
Hibbing,
Rainy River,
Vermilion
North
East
Initiatives, Capital: Science Labs (3),
Art Classroom, Biomass renovate;
Rightsizing /Demolition
D/C $3,344,000 $8,600,000 20,000 19,371 8,500 46,805
17 Winona State University Winona
South
East
Education Village, Phase I,
renovation
D/C $5,902,000 $18,697,000 1,000 18,816
18
Anoka Technical College
(Initiatives)
Anoka Metro
Initiatives: Manufacturing Technology
Hub, and Auto Tech Lab renovation
D/C $1,500,000 42,025
19 Saint Paul College St. Paul Metro
Health & Science Alliance Center
addition
D/C $14,482,000 36,770 3,248 8,000
20 Century College
White Bear
Lake
Metro
Classroom and Workforce Alignment
addition
D $1,000,000 $12,432,000 25,584 4,000 1,000
21 South Central College
North
Mankato
South
East
STEM and Healthcare Workforce
renovation
D/C $7,467,000 19,765 71,125
22 St. Cloud State University St. Cloud Central
Integrated Student Health and
Academic Programs renovation
D $865,000 $15,000,000 15,562 43,291
23
Minnesota State Community
and Technical College
(Initiatives)
Fergus
Falls,
Wadena
North
West
Initiatives: Campus Rightsizing, and
Center for Student Success
renovation
D/C $1,385,000 21,832
24
Northland Community and
Technical College
(Initiative)
East Grand
Forks
North
West
Initiative: Laboratory renovation D/C $749,000 754 4,450
25
Winona State University
(Initiative)
Winona
South
East
Initiative: Psychology Lab - Phelps
Hall renovation
D/C $591,760 3,703
$286,482,760 $59,173,000 278,285 540,800 202,301 132,195
$130,576,000
Appeared on 2013 Capital Budget Bonding List $155,906,760
$51,968,920
Square Footage
Previous Appropriation (2008-2012)
Project
Type
Project CostDesign
OR
Construct
First Time Submittal
Project Type Legend FY2014 - 2019 Major, HEAPR, and Demolition GRAND TOTAL:
Projects:
HEAPR:
user (MnSCU) Financing:
Priority Institution
Campus/
Location
Region Project Title
24. Program impact on space
Reflects impact of priority capital projects and demolition
Does not reflect HEAPR as these funds are facility system
focused
24
Square Footage
% of 2014
Program
Change in Square
Footage
Renovation 540,800 34.7% 0
Renewal 202,301 13.0% 0
New Facilities 278,285 17.9% +278,285
Total Demolition 535,645 34.4% -535,645
Total Impact 1,557,031 100.0% -257,360
25. HEAPR Highlights
$110 Million request
47 campuses have projects on the HEAPR list
110 individual projects
Nearly 90% have an energy savings component
2-3% for future design
1.25-1.5% for storm water compliance
25
26. HEAPR Highlights
26
Roof Repairs/
Replacement
Heating, Ventilati
on, & Air
Conditioning
Exterior -
Walls, Windows &
Doors
Building Interior
Plumbing
Electrical
Life Safety Codes Fire Safety Site
work
Utility
Infrastructure
27. Demolition Highlights
System-wide demolition/relocation of space – $20.6 million
Fiscal and facility sustainability
Eliminate backlog (demand for HEAPR) operating expenses
Target removal of obsolete space:
Mothballed
Chronically underutilized
Called out in campus facilities master plan
Demolish and mend campus facilities
Manage within HEAPR
May require legislative work to best incentivize program
27
28. Capital Projects
Programmatic Impact of $155.9 million investment
STEM: $48.0 million
Metropolitan State, NHED, Northland, South Central, and WSU
Allied Health: $45.5 million
Lake Superior, MSU, Mankato, and Saint Paul
Technical Programs: $38.4 million
Anoka, Central
Lakes, Century, DCTC, MCTC, MnWest, MState, Northland, Southea
st Technical, and Saint Paul
Business and Education: $21.7 million
Bemidji State, Century, RCTC, and Winona State
Student Support and Services: $2.3 million
MState and St Cloud State
28
29. Opportunities For Your Involvement
Today: Capital Bonding Advocacy Tours
Voice of the user – powerful influence
Thanks for the facilities you have
Needs for the future:
Future:
Master planning phase:
Vision, needs and desires
Funding strategies and priorities
Predesign and Design
Basic requirements
Scope, cost, and schedule
Delivery strategies
29
30. Campus Tours
Legislators and staff, MMB
Some visits are touring capital projects; others part of a
broader visit
Some using campus as hearing location
Capital investment committees highlighted
Senate Capital Investment developing schedule
30
31. Committees/Entities
Legislative Entities:
House Capital Investment
House Higher Education and Policy
Senate Capital Investment
Senate Higher Education and Workforce Development
Executive Branch:
Minnesota Management and Budget to help establish
Governor’s recommendation
31
32. Confirmed Legislative Tours
House Capital Investment:
September 17 – Anoka Technical, Central Lakes (Brainerd)
September 18 – Bemidji State University
September 19 – Minnesota State Community and Technical College,
Moorhead
September 24 – Century College, Lake Superior College
September 25 – Hibbing Community College
September 26 – Itasca Community College
October 8 – Winona State University, Rochester Community and
Technical College
October 9 – MSU, Mankato
October 29 – Saint Paul College , Metropolitan State University
Senate Capital Investment:
October 2 – Hibbing Community College
October 3 – Central Lakes College (Staples)
32
34. 2015 Revenue Fund
Basics
Odd-year cycles (2011, 2013, etc)
System issues bonds (not state)
Fee revenue is payment mechanism
2015 Projects
Early stages
$60 million projected
5 campuses (MSU
Moorhead, MSU, Mankato, Century, Inver Hills, NHED -
Vermilion)
34
Hinweis der Redaktion
Note that more than half of our campuses have greater than 50% of their space that is older than 30 years
Board guidelines for 2014 are straight forward…
HEAPR has been the Board's #1 priority…it is consistent with Board Guideline to “take care of what we have.’It’s used for taking care of our buildings and systems…code compliance, energy improvementsOur strategy is to Keep Up with anticipated renewal (5 years - $414M) needs and Catch Up by reducing the deferred maintenance backlog ($705M) by 50% over 10 years.Our current FCI – facilities condition index (ratio of backlog to replacement value) for all academic space is .113 which is slightly up for prior years, but in the ‘better than’ camp when compared to national peers.
The recommended capital program for 2014 seeks $227.7 million in state general obligation bonding funds to be coupled with $58.8 million in system financing to execute a total capital program of $286.5 million.The program includes; - $130.6 million for Higher Education Asset Preservation and Replacement or HEAPR and demolition of/relocation from obsolete space…above and beyond what is embedded in line-item projects - $155.9 million for 24 priority line-item projects Within the 24 priority line-item projects:8 have been funded for design or advanced work in prior years ($112M of the $155.9M – 70%)8 have been to the legislature 2 times ($27M – 17%) 5 represent smaller projects formerly bundled as system-wide initiatives, now bundled at intuitional priorities ($5.9M) Just 3 major projects are ‘new’ 2 decoupled design and construction from original request ($1.9M)1 stand alone design and construction project ($7.9M)If all projects were fully funded, there would be round $59 million in ‘tails’ for future bondingEqually important is what is not on the list:14 proposed projects reflecting $125.8 million in work2 seen before ($) (SMSU/A-R)5 represent substantial additional square footage (+175K sq. ft.)
The 24 line-item projects reflect work at 27 campuses - 6 – Metro - 21 – Outstate2 at: Saint Paul, Winona and Century
This chart is Table 1, from page 83 of your Board packet depicting the impact of the 24 recommended line-item capital projects and the demolition of obsolete space through the Demolition Initiative.The program impacts 1.5 million square feet of the system’s 21.7 million square feet of academic space…or roughly 7%. - One half of the space is renovation and renewal of existing space - Less than 20% of the program is dedicated to new space….(Metro – 65.7K, Mankato – 55.7K, M-State – 22.6K, Saint Paul – 36.7K, and Century – 25.6K)Demolition of obsolete space both through line-item projects and the Demolition Initiative makes this recommended program “Space Negative” by reducing the overall footprint by one-quarter of a million square feet of academic space. (Compared to net increase (actual) of 160K 2010-2012)
Thank you for your time and engagement here…I look forward to your questions and discussion.