1. Evidence-Based Surgery
Role of Gamma Knife Surgery in Metastatic
Melanoma of the Brain
Sanmugarajah Paramasvaran
9th February 2012
1
2. Clinical Case
⢠83 year old man
⢠Previous history of
melanoma and prostatic
cancer
⢠Intermittent confusion , gait
disturbance and urinary
incontinence
⢠MRI : 6 supratentorial mets
⢠Craniotomy and excision of
largest/symptomatic mets
⢠HPE : metastatic melanoma
2
3. Clinical Questions:
⢠Melanoma is a radioresistant tumour
ď Does addition of GKS to WBRT prolong
survival in metastatic melanoma of the brain?
3
4. Search strategy
⢠P = Patients with metastatic melanoma of the brain
⢠I = Gamma Knife Surgery and WBRT
⢠C = WBRT
⢠O = survival benefit
Search Keywords (exp MESH )
â Melanomaâ âBrain Metas*â âGamma Knifeâ
âRadiotherapyâ
4
8. Selection Criteria
⢠Cerebral melanoma metastasis
⢠GKS + WBRT
⢠Retrospective/prospective studies
⢠Last 20 yrs
⢠English Language
8
9. Levels of Evidence (NHMRC)
Class l â nil
Class ll â nil
Class lll â nil
Class lV- 7
9
10. The articles
1. Outcome predictors of Gamma Knife Surgery for Melanoma Brain
Metastases
Donald N. Liew, M.D.et al, J Neurosurg 114:769â779, 2011
2. Gamma Knife surgery in the management of radioresistant brain
metastases in high-risk patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma,
and sarcoma
John W. Powell et al, J Neurosurg (Suppl) 109:000â000, 2008
3. Gamma Knife Surgery in Brain Melanomas: Absence of Extracranial
Metastases and Tumour Volume Strongest Indicators of Prolonged
Survival
Bente Sandvei Skeie, WORLD NEUROSURGERY 75 [5/6]: 684-691, MAY/JUNE 2011
10
11. 4. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for intracranial metastatic melanoma: an
analysis of survival and prognostic factors
Mehmet Koc et al; Journal of Neuro-Oncology (2005) 71: 307â313
5 Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral metastatic melanoma
Salvador Somaza et al, J Neurosurg 79:661-666, 1993
6 Metastatic Melanoma To The Brain: Prognostic Factors After Gamma
Knife Surgery
Cheng Yu Ph.D. et al, Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 1277â1287,
2002
7. Cerebral Metastases from Malignant Melanoma: Current Treatment
Strategies, Advances in Novel Therapeutics and Future Directions
Timothy L. Siu and Suyun Huang , Cancers 2010, 2, 364-375
11
12. Summary of findings
Year /Center No Type of Methods Results/Conclusion
study
1993, 23 Retrosp All pts WBRT + ďMedian survival 9 months for
Pittsburgh, GKS pts with single mets and 7
US months for multiple mets
ď18/19 died due to systemic
disease
2002,Los 122 Retrosp 39 had WBRT + > Median survival
Angeles GKS GKS : 7.5 months
GKS + WBRT : 5 months
>Predictors of survival
Tumor volume< 3 cm3
Absent systemic disease
KPS > 80
Supratentorial location
12
13. Year /Center No Type Of Methods Result
Study
2005,Ohio, 26 Retrosp 14 pts had ďMedian survival 6
US WBRT + GKS, months
5 had GKS ďPrognostic factors :
KPS>90,Female,Suprat
entorial mets, absent
neurology
ďWBRT,
chemo/immunotherapy,
age , no of mets : not
significant
13
15. Year /Center No Type of Methods Results/Conclusion
study
2008, 76 Retrosp Melanoma(50),RC ďMedian survival with GKS
New York C(23),sarcomas(3) â 5.1 months
WBRT â 37 pts ďNo realtionship with
WBRT
ďPrognostic : Single mets
and and KPS score
2011, 333 Retrosp WBRT + SRS(87) Median Survival
Pittsburgh ective Surgery + SRS ďWBRT + GKS : 4.5 m
(19) ďSRS : 6.4 m
Surgery + WBRT
+ SRS (31) Poor Prognostic factors
ď > 4 mets
ď KPPS < 90
ď no immunotherapy
15
16. Year /Center No Type of Methods Results/Conclusion
study
2011 77 Retrosp 16 had WBRT Median survival ; 7
Bente months
Sandvei Selection:
Skeie et al 1) < 4 mets
2) <3.5 cm With WBRT
Norway 3) No mass ďąNo additional survival
effect time
4) KPS > 70
ďąIncidence of new
brain mets not
deceresed
16
17. ⢠GKS compares well with surgery
⢠WBRT had been routinely given
⢠Melanoma is under represented
⢠Randomized control study shows neurocognitive decline with
WBRT*
⢠SRS only for resection bed
17
18. Summary
⢠No evidence that WBRT + GKS improves survival
⢠GKS alone would be sufficient
⢠Selection Criteria :
1) KPS Score
2) Size < 3cm
3) No of mets < 4
18